the syntax section of the delv: theory and examples thomas roeperumass, amherst...
TRANSCRIPT
The SYNTAX section of the DELV: Theory and Examples
Thomas Roeper UMass, [email protected]
Barbara Z. PearsonUMass, [email protected]
*supported by NIH grant N01-DC-8-2104to the University of Massachusetts and Smith College
*webpage: www.umass.edu/aae/
The DELV SYNTAX Domain
• Focuses on a few core concepts of modern syntax
• Introduces elements of complexity• (to reveal hidden knowledge)
• From these principles, we make the following predictions/claims:
• 1. A new range of higher level disorders come into view.
• 2. These disorders are particularly pertinent to school-level tasks.
Components of The DELV SYNTAX Domain
Question Type Core Concepts
WH-QUESTION COMPREHENSION
Variables
Movement
PASSIVES Movement
Hidden properties
ARTICLES Discourse properties(something in a prior sentence making requirements on an element in a
subsequent sentence)
Core CONCEPT #1 IN SYNTAX on the DELV
• I. Principles of MOVEMENT • Simple:• “I saw a boy, a girl, and a dog.” =>• “What did I see ( - ) ?”• Complex:• What did she say she saw ( - )?
• Does the child get complex movement right?
•
Core Syntactic Concept #1 on the DELV (con’t)
Does the child know…1. Where the WH word originates What did he eat ( - )? When did she say ( - ) she lost her purse (- )?
2. When certain structures "block" certain meanings:Ex. When did she say how she lost her purse?
can only mean "when did she SAY it” not “When did she lose it?”
Core Syntactic CONCEPT #2 on the DELV
• II. VARIABLES • (words that are intended to refer not to a single
referent, but to members of a set)• Examples:• Simple Question (1 variable)• . (“I saw a boy, a girl, and a dog.”)• “What did I see?” • “what” = set of objects (boy, girl, dog)• “Who was at dinner?”• “who” = the 5 or 6 individuals at dinner•
Core Syntactic CONCEPT #2 on the DELV (con’t)
• II. b. Complex Variables• 2 variables in the same sentence:• “who bought what?” requires
reference to all the members in the 2 sets in an ordered relation:
• Person 1 bought Thing 1• Person 2 bought Thing 2
• Does the child get variable properties
right?
Core Syntactic CONCEPT #2 on the DELV (con’t)
Does the child know how to answer Double WH-questions:
Who ate what?How did she play what?
Requires “set” answers to BOTH questions (he and she, chocolate and vanilla)
Not just listed, but PAIRED.
Ex. HE ate CHOCOLATE, and SHE ate VANILLA.
Testing Complex WH-Question Comprehension
We test this:1) Can children answer both parts of a double-WH? 2) Can children answer questions whose site of origin
is far away (long distance)?
and 3) Can children appropriately block meanings that the
grammar doesn’t allow, i.e.when there is a barrier?
Wh-Question Comprehension:Testing Procedure
The child is told a brief story about a pictured event.
They are then asked the key test question about some aspect of the event.
The pictured events and stories support several possible interpretations of the question.
This girl played different things in different ways. She played the drums with her feet and the piano
with her hands. How did the girl play what?
c. The Psychological Corporation
Copyrighted Picture Omitted
This father and this baby were having lunch together. Who ate what?
c. The Psychological Corporation
Copyrighted Picture Omitted
Typical Answers to double WH questions
PAIRED, EXHAUSTIVE responses Ex. She played the piano with her hands and the drums with her
feet. SINGLETONS (Incorrect)
One element: “piano” “with her feet” Both objects, no instruments: “piano and drums” One pair: “the piano with her hands.”
OTHER “She played a lot.” “She was playing.”
Double-WH Example Responses from field testing
CHILD A (12663)
Feet and her hands
CHILD B (18221)
She played the piano with her hands and the drums with her feet.
Instruments xx only
0 points
Paired and exhaustive
1 point
Double-WH Example 2
CHILD A (12663)
Ball, a yoyo
CHILD B (18221)
The girl played with the yoyo, the boy played with the balloon
Objects only
0 points
Paired and exhaustive
1 point
Double-WH Example 3
CHILD A (12663)
Banana and a apple
CHILD B (18221)
The dad ate the apple, the baby ate the nana.
Objects only
0 points
Paired and exhaustive
1 point
Double WH Response Types by Age and Language Status (N = 1014, 708 Typically Developing,
306 Language Impaired)
Fig. 1b. Double WH Response Types
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
4 5 6 7 8 9
Age Yrs
Not Paired
OTHER-LI
Paired Exhaustive
Not Paired-LI
Paired
Exhaustive-LI
This mother snuck out one night when her little girl was asleep and bought a surprise birthday cake. The next day the little girl saw the bag from the store and asked, “What did you buy?” The mom wanted to keep the surprise until
later so she said, “ Just some paper towels.” -- What did the mom say she bought?
c. The Psychological Corporation
Copyrighted Picture Omitted
Typical Answers to “False Clause” questions
LONG DISTANCE (LD) TWO CLAUSE responses Ex. She said she bought paper towels.
ONE CLAUSE responses (Incorrect) Ex. (She bought) a birthday cake.
OTHER “a surprise” “a bag” “I don’t know.”
WH-False Clause Example Responses from field testing
CHILD A (12663)
A cake
CHILD B (18221)
Paper towels
1 clause answer
0 points
2-clause answer (long distance)
1 point
LD False Clause Response Types by Age and Language Status (N = 1014)
Fig. 3 WH "False Clause" Response Types
by Age and Language Status
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
4 5 6 7 8 9
Age Yrs
1 clause-
TD
LD 2
clauses-TD
OTHER-LI
1-clause-
TD
LD 2
clauses-LI
Item Type 3 Barrier to Long Distance Movement
Note: Children’s ability to give LD answers (without embedded false clause) was tested in piloting and then in the DSLT Tryout testing. 90% of the children ages 4-6 and 95% of the children 7-10 gave at least one Long Distance answer, so for reasons of time, simple Long Distance items do not appear on the DELV.
This mom didn’t know how to bake a cake. She saw a TV program about cooking, and she learned to make a lovely cake with pudding
mix.-- How did the mom learn what to bake?
c. The Psychological Corporation
Copyrighted Picture Omitted
Typical Answers toWH-barriers questions
SHORT DISTANCE responses (How did she learn…?) By watching TV..
MEDIAL ANSWERS (Incorrect) (…what to bake?) “a cake”
LONG DISTANCE responses (Incorrect) (How…..bake?) “With a pudding mix,” “With a spoon”
OTHER Ex. “She didn’t know how.”
WH-barrier Example Responses 2Who did she ask what to buy?
CHILD A (12663)
bologna
CHILD B (18221)
The grocery store lady
Medial
0 points
Short Distance
1 point
WH Barrier Response Types by Age and Language Status (N = 1014)
WH "Barriers" Response Types by Age and
Language Status
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
4 5 6 7 8 9
Age Yrs
Short Distance-TD
Short Distance-LI
Medial-TD
Medial-LI
OTHER-li
Other WH Example Responses
CHILD A (12663)
2 correct barriers, 2 barrier violations1 other
CHILD B (18221)
4 correct barriers1 medial
2 points (of 5)
Total:4 of 14
4 points (of 5)
Total: 12 of 14
Who are these children?
CHILD A (12663)
5 years oldWhite FemaleFrom South
Parents w/ HS education
Mainstream English speaker
Not receiving speech or language services
CHILD B (18221)
4 years oldAfrican American boyFrom “north Central” USParents w/ HS education
“Some difference” from MAE”
Not receiving speech or language services
Also on the DELV:PASSIVES: TESTING for HIDDEN
INFORMATION
Does the child distinguish these two sentences?
Ex. The ball dropped
The ball was dropped => hidden AGENT
ARTICLES: TESTING REQUIREMENTS OF DISCOURSE PROPERTIES
Does the child carry information from one sentence into another?
Ex. A bird flew out of a cage because something was open? What was it?
THE door (nor A door)
Has the child learned to interpret articles as reference to context?
Conclusions
We have shown that the assessment of complex aspects of children’s syntactic development between the ages of 4 and 9 can be carried out in a dialect neutral fashion.
These materials and procedures capture the development of several aspects of language that are vital for success in early schooling and the transition to literacy.
They provide the clinician with a substantial profile of the child language strengths and weaknesses, not just a diagnostic categorization.
As such they provide a much richer evaluation of language variation and its sources that has direct implications for areas and methods of intervention.