the tanker owners commitment to clean seas and safe oil...

24
The Tanker Owners Commitment to Clean Seas and Safe Oil Transportation Sea Alarm Foundation Conference Ostend, Belgium 1-3 October 2007 Tim Wilkins Environmental Manager Image Courtesy of NORDEN AS

Upload: others

Post on 17-Apr-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Tanker Owners Commitment to Clean

Seas and Safe Oil Transportation

Sea Alarm Foundation Conference

Ostend, Belgium1-3 October 2007

Tim WilkinsEnvironmental Manager

Image C

ourtesy of NO

RD

EN

AS

INTERTANKO

International Association of Independent Tanker Owners

Representing oil and chemical tanker owners

– 260 Members– 40+ countries– 2,650+ tankers– 220 million dwt– 75% of independent tanker fleet– 85% of chemical tanker fleet– 300 Associate Members

0102030405060708090

1900

1910

1920

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

ROWMiddle EastWestern EuropeUSA

World Oil Supply 1900-2005(Million bls/day)

The Business Environment

Crude Oil Seaborne Trade

The Business Environment

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

USKorea

Norway

Japan

OECDIta

lyFrance UK ME

WorldFSUL Amer

ChinaAfric

aIndia

Lit re

Oil consumption per capita(Litres/day - 2003)

The Business Environment

Tonnes spilt per billion tonne-mile transported

So long as we have a demand we will have a risk…

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07Source: ITOPF/Fearnleys/INTERTANKO

The Business Environment

Tanker Industry Today1. Tanker regulations

1. Single-Phase-out2. New chemical tanker rules

2. Industry self-regulation – Industry Initiatives

3. Future Challenges1. Human element2. Persistent deliberate discharges - reception facilities

m dwt

Assumptions :MARPOL phase out allows for trading until the age of 25 years old, max 2015The EU alternative does not allow SH trading after 2010.DB/DS can trade until the age of 25 years old, but here cut off 2015

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

MARPOL (min phase out - trading of SHuntil 25 years)EU + no SH after 2010

OPA90

1. Tanker regulations

1. Tanker regulations

622

5159

67 68 73 76 79 82 85

9478

4941

33 32 27 24 21 18 15

0

20

40

60

80

10019

91

1997

End

02

End

03

End

04

End

05

End

06

End

07

End

08

End

09

End

10

SH/DB/DS

DH

% dwt share*:

* Assumes phase out according to regulations (rounded upwards, 25 years after 2010.

Double-hull percentage rising steadily

Average age steadily reducing (tankers above 10,000 dwt)Years

6

8

10

12

14

16

1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006

1. Tanker regulations

Changes to MARPOL Annex IICarriage of hazardous and noxious substances

1. Tanker regulations

Imag

e co

urte

sy o

f Odf

jell

AS

A

Chemical tanker changesConstruction

Changes to MARPOL Annex IICarriage of hazardous and noxious substances

1. Tanker regulations

Chemical tanker changesConstruction

Changes to MARPOL Annex IICarriage of hazardous and noxious substances

1. Tanker regulations

Imag

e co

urte

sy o

f Odf

jell

AS

A

Chemical tanker changesConstruction

Tank stripping

Discharge requirements

Pollution Category changes3 Category Pollution System

Building and operating better ships

- Condition Assessment Scheme (survey programme)

- Common Structural Rules

- Tank (Ballast and cargo) corrosion rules

1. Tanker regulations

2. Industry Initiatives

International Association of Independent Tanker Owners

MISSION “Provide leadership to the Tanker Industry in serving the world with the safe, environmentally sound and efficient seaborne transportation of oil, gas and

chemical products.”

VISION for the TANKER INDUSTRY“A responsible, sustainable and respected Tanker Industry, committed to

continuous improvement and constructively influencing its future.”

INTERTANKO Membership Criteria

Entry Criteria

• Entry of Tank vessels into Membership• Classification Societies• Insurance Cover• Transparency of Ownership• State Owned Companies entry criterion• IMO Voluntary Flag State• PSC Detentions

Best Practices

• Budget Resources• Breaches of MARPOL• Reporting Deficiencies to Class• Leading Industry Performance• IMO Pilotage Recommendations for Danish Waters• Guide for Correct Entries in the Oil record book• Right Whale Avoidance • Best Practice - Cadet Berths • IMO Guidelines for Lifeboat Safety• Incident Transparency• Ballast Water Management Plan • Emergency Response for Damage Stability• Monitoring Members Detentions

2. Industry Initiatives

2. Industry Initiatives

Joint Pilotage User Group– Danish Maritime Authority, Royal Danish Administration of Navigation and

Hydrography, INTERTANKO, INTERCARGO, ICS, BIMCO and OCIMF

• From January – July 2006• Ships passages increase 3% • Letters to flag-state decrease by 29% • Ships without pilot decrease by 53% • Tanker passages without pilot decrease by 29% • Tankers with a draught of 11 metres or more taking pilot 97,9%

2. Industry Initiatives

Best practice initiatives• Industry Guidance on Use of Oily Water Separators and Completion of Oil

Record Book• Guide for treatment of engine room wastes – including means to limit

generation of waste, better management of waste, better design and sizing of equipment, (revisions to Marpol), and additional training

3. Future challenges

0

200

400

600

800

1000

78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06

0

84

168

252

336

420

00 01 02 03 04 05 06

War

H & M

F & E

Grounding

Collis.

Misc

Reported tanker incidents

with human error cases increasing• groundings 17%• collisions 33%

Human Element

3. Future challenges

• Current and future shortages- Shortage now or in the future?

• Quality gap (training and experience)• Attracting new officers – industry image and criminalisation

Industry Action• Human Element in shipping Committee• Tanker Officer Training Standards (TOTS)• Cadet Berths – Survey & Policy• STCW revision / IMO Human Element Committee

Human Element

3. Future Challenges

Persistent and Deliberate Discharge of Oil

A typical Reception and Treatment facility

Courtesy of OSRL/EARL Singapore

Fuel Oil Sludge from All Ship Types 187,990M/T

Bilge Oil from All Ship Types 64,400M/T

Cargo Discharges from Tankers 19,250M/T (158,600M/T in 1990)

3. Future Challenges

Persistent and Deliberate Discharge of Oil30 years of MARPOLPerception and reality – reporting problem?Industry Port Reception Facilities Forum

IMO Action Plan: • Advanced Notification Forms• Waste Delivery Receipts• Technical problems reviewed

• Tanker industry record good, but always room for improvement

• Improvement must come from industry experience and expertise (pre-empting)

• Balance to be struck between regulation and self-regulation – but this requires an active and forward thinking industry

• Other ship types need also to be considered

thank you…

[email protected]