the team that wasnt! what did eric do right? what did eric do wrong? describe randy in the context...
DESCRIPTION
Beliefs Affect Action Beliefs are Cause Maps that We Impose on Reality Believing Controls Seeing What We See Conditions Further (Reinforces) BeliefTRANSCRIPT
The Team That Wasn’t!• What did Eric do right? What did Eric do wrong?• Describe Randy in the context of Covey.• Critique:
– Katzenbach--’the team or Randy must go– Segol--’objective vague, leadership weak, keep
Randy involved’– Baard--’problem is fusion, not Randy’ – Garber--’company culture doesn’t support
teams’– Hackman--’Randy acts as special agent’– Musselwhite & Hurson--’re-launch the team w/
inspiring goal & neutralize Randy’
Group Think: The Video
• View the video with Covey’s framework in mind.
• Describe the psycho-dynamics of the situation.
• Why did it happen as it did?• How would an ‘authentic leader’ manage
the situation?
Beliefs Affect Action
• Beliefs are Cause Maps that We Impose on Reality
• Believing Controls Seeing• What We See Conditions
Further (Reinforces) Belief
GroupThink Team Traits
• Sense of Infallibility• Unquestioned Morality• Suppression of Dissent• Quest for Unanimity• Stereotyping of Non-group
Members
GroupThink
ConvergentThought
Problem A Conclusion
Discussion& Debate Problem
No Action Decision Process
Ideal Decision Process
Problem Dialogue Discussion Action
Divergent Thinking
Convergent Thinking
"Gentlemen, I take it we are all in complete agreement on
the decision here...Then I propose we postpone further
discussion of this matter until our next meeting to
give ourselves time to develop disagreement and
perhaps gain some understanding of what the
decision is all about."
Preventing GroupThink• Promote/Encourage Inquiry (before
Advocacy)• Suspend Point of View and Hold for
Examination by All• Test & Question, especially that
which everyone believes true• Take Time• Never, Ever, Criticize or Judge
Members' Ideas
Productive Conflict Emerges When:• The team’s leader understands the
need for well-framed questions• The team is comprised of
heterogeneous thinking members– but with mutual respect
• The process of decision making delays forming early consensus– require each member to offer at least two alternative
views on each major issue– engage in brainstorming
Dealing with the Dominator
• Keep others involved by asking questions• Direct observations and remarks to the
group• Don’t engage in a one-on-one battle• Listen to the Dominator: give the person the
time everyone deserves• Don’t assume an adversarial position
Unsilencing the Silent
• Use open ended questions directed at the group as a whole and at the silent one(s) in particular
• Don’t embarrass the silent one(s) by using humor or calling attention to their lack of participation
• Responds positively to when the silent do speak-- listen
Discouraging the Socializer• Don’t get caught up in their story -- always
keep the purpose of the meeting in the forefront
• Be sensitive to the person(s) need for relationships
• Don’t belittle, badger or discount this person• Gently, but firmly bring the discussion back
on track
What If the Team is MisManaged
• Seek to Understand the Leader’s Frame
• Try to Communicate What You Believe the Team Needs for Better Decision Making
• Be Tactful• Be Positive