the underpinnings of developing an instrument to measure ... · the underpinnings of developing an...

30
The Underpinnings of Developing an Instrument to Measure Systems Thinking Abilities in the Context of Earth System Science NICHOLAS A. SOLTIS AND KAREN S. MCNEAL DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES, AUBURN UNIVERSITY, 2050 BEARD EAVES COLISEUM, AUBURN, AL 36849 1

Upload: others

Post on 27-Apr-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Underpinnings of Developing an Instrument to Measure Systems Thinking Abilities in the Context of Earth System ScienceNICHOLAS A. SOLTIS AND KAREN S. MCNEAL

DEPA RT M EN T OF GEOSCI ENCES , AUBUR N UN I VERS I TY, 2050 BEA R D EAVES C OL I SEUM , AUBUR N , A L 36849

1

Thinking like a Geoscientist

Spatial Thinking

Temporal Thinking

Systems Thinking

2

Thinking like a Geoscientist

Spatial Thinking

Temporal Thinking

Systems Thinking

3

Thinking like a Geoscientist

Spatial Thinking

Temporal Thinking

Systems Thinking

4

Thinking like a Geoscientist

Spatial Thinking

Temporal Thinking

Systems Thinking

5

Challenges to Earth Systems ThinkingConceptualization of natural Earth environments as systems

Understanding the complex characteristics of systems◦ Multiple variables, above and below average data, not at

equilibrium

The application of conceptual models of complex Earth systems to support environmental problem solving

Systems thinking skills must be explicitly taught, How do we know if we are teaching them?

6Herbert, 2006

Concept Inventories

7

Methods

Write instrument based on table of

specifications

Internal and external

expert review of items

Think-aloud interviews with target audience

Pilot Study (250

individuals)Analysis

Full Study

(750 individuals)

8

Revise

Content Validity Construct Validity

Cultural Validity

Developing a Framework

How we teach

What the literature says

EST CI Framework

9

How we teach

Earth Systems Thinking Teaching

Systems Model

Elements

Systems Thinking Elements

Real World Application

Elements

Soltis et al., In Press 10

Developing a Framework

How we teach

What the literature says

EST CI Framework

Soltis et al.

11

What the literature says

12

Earth System Perspective

Emphasis on high-level interconnections between major Earth spheres

Earth System Thinking SkillsEmphasis on transformation of matter in Earth

cycles and specific system thinking concepts

Complexity Sciences

Emphasis on scientific study of complex systems

Authentic Complex Earth and Environmental Systems

Emphasis on knowledge of a specific Earth system or phenomenon

Scherer et al., 2017

What the literature says

13

Earth System PerspectiveEmphasis on high-level interconnections

between major Earth spheres

Scherer et al., 2017

What the literature says

14

Earth System Thinking Skills

Emphasis on transformation of matter in Earth cycles and specific system thinking concepts

Scherer et al., 2017

What the literature says

15

Complexity SciencesEmphasis on scientific study of complex

systems

Scherer et al., 2017

What the literature says

16

Authentic Complex Earth and Environmental

Systems Emphasis on knowledge of a specific Earth

system or phenomenon

Scherer et al., 2017

What the literature says

17

Earth System Perspective

Emphasis on high-level interconnections between major Earth spheres

Earth System Thinking SkillsEmphasis on transformation of matter in Earth

cycles and specific system thinking concepts

Complexity Sciences

Emphasis on scientific study of complex systems

Authentic Complex Earth and Environmental Systems

Emphasis on knowledge of a specific Earth system or phenomenon

Scherer et al., 2017

Developing a Framework

How we teach

What the literature says

EST CI Framework

Scherer et al.

Soltis et al.

18

Systems Thinking Elements

Systems ModelElements

Real World Application

Elements

Earth System Perspective

Earth System Thinking Skills

Authentic Complex Earth and Environmental Systems

Perspective

Earth System Perspective

Complexity Sciences

Developing a Framework

How we teach

What the literature says

EST CI Framework

Scherer et al.

Soltis et al.

20

An access point: Biogeochemical Cycles?

Undergraduates largely have incomplete conceptions of the carbon cycle and other biogeochemical cycles

21Soltis et al., in revision

CI Framework

22

Framework Sample Question Stem

Earth System Perspective Photosynthesis represents a flux of carbon dioxide from where to where?

Earth System Thinking Skills If the ocean absorbs more carbon than it releases, in this capacity it is best thought of as what?

Complexity Sciences Based on the diagram, which of the following would enhance the rate of soil erosion?

Authentic Complex Earth and Environmental Systems* * Too contextualized to be appropriate for general concept inventory

Participants

Expert Review◦ 9 experts in Earth system science, systems thinking, and/or instrument development

Think-Aloud Interviews◦ 6 undergraduate students

◦ Compensated with a $20 Amazon gift card

Pilot and Implementation ◦ Online crowd sourcing: MTURK

◦ MTURK samples are representatively similar to traditional research subject pools in terms of race, gender, age, and education

◦ 250 in initial pilot

◦ Full implementation of 750

◦ Compensated through MTURK at a fair market rate for their time

23

MTurk: A Crowdsourcing WebsiteVirtual labor marketplace where “requesters” create tasks for “workers” to complete for monetary compensation◦ Requester: employer/researcher

◦ Worker (Turker): employee/participant

24

Advantages and Disadvantages ADVANTAGES

Subject pool access◦ Access to wide range of participants

Subject pool diversity◦ Access to diverse range of

participants

Low overall cost◦ Low payment

◦ Quick data collection

DISADVANTAGES

Data quality◦ Data accuracy◦ Participant identity

Ethicality◦ Payment◦ Participant treatment◦ Length/effort

Sample bias

Buhrmester, 2017 25

Analysis

Both Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory will be used

Item difficulty and item discrimination will be determined for each item and exploratory factor analysis will be employed (CTT)

Rasch analysis will be applied to each unidimensional scale determined (IRT)

Will be conducted for initial pilot with revisions made as needed

Repeated for full implementation-◦ Confirmatory factor analysis instead of exploratory factor analysis

◦ Iterative process, with revisions being made as needed based on analysis

26

Classical Test Theory

• Test is unit of analysis• Assumption that everyone

has a true score that is unknowable

• Observed score equals true score plus error

• Uses linear model

Item Response Theory

• The item is the unit of analysis

• Focuses on comparing and analyzing each item

• Uses non-linear model (logistic)

27

ConclusionsSystems thinking is integral

Research on systems thinking is moving forward

We need a quantitative instrument to assess students’ systems thinking skills

Concept Inventories are key in gathering quantitative data

A strict development process is required for reliability and validity

Tools like mTurk can be used to better gather large amounts of data

28

Acknowledgements Chris Schnittka, Stephanie Shepherd, Joni Lakin, Anne Gold, Leilani Arthurs, Juliette Rooney-Varga, Lisa Gilbert, Hannah Scherer for their insights in the development and revision of this instrument

Auburn University Department of Geosciences and Advisory Board for travel funds

29

ConclusionsSystems thinking is integral

Research on systems thinking is moving forward

We need a quantitative instrument to assess students’ systems thinking skills

Concept Inventories are key in gathering quantitative data

A strict development process is required for reliability and validity

Tools like mTurk can be used to better gather large amounts of data

30