the university of calgary planning & resource allocation process workshops november 17, 2004
Post on 21-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
Objectives of Workshop
Address the following:
• Planning and Resource Allocation Process
• Instructions & Expectations
• Overview of financial component
• Questions
Planning Process to Date
• Academic Plan Update
• Strategy Map development
• Business Plan 2004-08 Prominence & Promise: An Update
• Comprehensive Faculty Plans
Planning Accountability
President/ Vice-President Group
Provost and VP (Academic)
4 Year Business
Plan
Academic Plan
General Faculties Council
Board of Governors
Academic Plan Priorities & Business Plan Goals
University of CalgaryBusiness Plan 2004 - 2008
Advanced Health
& Wellness
Leading Innovation In Energy
& the Environment
Under-standing Human
Behaviour, Institutions & Cultures
CreatingTechnologies & Managing Information
Academic Plan Priorities
Academic Plan Priorities & Business Plan Goals
Create a Quality Learning Environment
built on Integrated
Teaching, Research and Creative Activities
Return to Our Communities
Responsive & Responsible Organization
Positive Work Environment
Business Plan 2004 – 2008 Goals
Comprehensive Plans
President/ Vice-President Group
Provost and VP (Academic)
4 Year Business
Plan
Academic Plan
General Faculties Council
Board of Governors
Deans&
Directors
Comprehensive Plans
Comprehensive Plans
...A Process of Refinement
Fund Development Component
Human Resources Component
Information TechnologyComponent
Space & Physical
Infrastructure Component
EnrollmentComponent
Business DevelopmentComponent
Educational Component
Research Component
Community Service
Component
Comprehensive Faculty Plans
Planning & Resource Allocation Timelines
Planning Criteria
Submission Instructions
November 9, 2004 December 15, 2004
Faculty/Unit Submission
January 10-18, 2005
P/VP Group Meetings
February 2 & 16, 2005
TUBC/UPC Scheduled Meetings
March 15, 2005
Planning & Finance
Committee Meeting
April 22, 2005
Board of Governors
Meeting
Key Decision Point Key Decision Point
“Financial planning and budgeting should consider all of the resources available to
the University”-Planning Principles & Assumptions; Directions from TUBC for the
2003/04 and 2004/05 Budgets; Memo dated Feb 10, 2003
Planning
Planning For All Resources
Available Resources
Operating ReservesSpecial Purpose
Sponsored Research
Including:
•Space•Technology
•People•$•Capital
Instructions & Expectations
• Criteria for 2005-09 Resource Allocation Process
• Planning and Resource Submission Instructions
How & Why were criteria established?
How?• Primary Criteria
derived from 4-year business plan broad parameters
• Secondary Criteria developed to address need for more specific direction
Why?• Request for enhanced transparency of resource allocation
decisions• Provide guidance and framework for planning and
decision-making
How will the Criteria be Used?
• Submissions made by Senior Budget Officers (Deans/Directors)
• P/VP and TUBC decisions
• Communication of re-allocation and investment decisions
Primary Criteria for Resource Allocation Decisions
Return to our CommunitiesResponsible & Responsive
Institution
Create a Quality Learning Environment built on Integrated Teaching, Research and Creative Activities
Positive Work Environment
Optimize our available resources to deliver an exceptional learning
experience to our students
Recruit, retain & reward high calibre academic staff
Become internationally recognized as a top Canadian research university
Create a Quality Learning Environment built on Integrated Teaching, Research and Creative Activities
Establish an undergraduate learning experience that integrates research and
teaching
Principle criterion that reflects the principal mandate of the University of Calgary
Enabling & Supporting Criteria
Return to our CommunitiesResponsible & Responsive
InstitutionPositive Work Environment
Improve Business Processes, Decision-making and Leadership
throughout the University
Enhance the Support provided to Teaching, Research and Creative
Activities
Develop Strategic Partnerships to create synergies and opportunities for
resource sharing
Increase Engagement with our Communities
Increase community awareness and impact of the University of Calgary
and its graduates
Create a culture that recognizes the importance of contributions from all
employees and volunteers
Secondary Criteria for Resource Allocation Decisions
Objectives:
• Encourage change Optimize effective use of resources Maintain or enhance quality
• Provide incentives Improved efficiency Decreased dependency on traditional funding
sources
Secondary Criteria for Resource Allocation Decisions
1. Use of effective approaches to teaching that maximize available resources
• E.g. blended or on-line instructional methods to improve student learning, inquiry and allocation of teaching resources
2. Unit’s support for the University Enrolment Plan and the principles on which it is based
• E.g. achieving approved undergraduate enrolment targets, while improving the quality of the students admitted, and increasing the number and quality of PhD students
Secondary Criteria for Resource Allocation Decisions
3. Expansion of sponsored or applied research activity to reduce reliance on the central university budgets
• E.g. Maximize the benefits of sponsored or applied research to the University’s operating budget through recovery of overhead, innovative use of indirect costs of research funds or full/partial leveraging of funds for faculty positions
Secondary Criteria for Resource Allocation Decisions
4. Use of shared or integrated resources within the unit to improve effectiveness, enhance quality, and maximize resources available to implement the Academic Plan.
• E.g. Shared support services, faculty positions, administrative positions or infrastructure.
Secondary Criteria for Resource Allocation Decisions
5. Use of innovative staffing arrangements and support mechanisms to optimize resources available to meet priority needs as set out in the Academic Plan and the Comprehensive Unit Plan
• E.g. Use of differential teaching assignments and consideration of these differentials in performance assessment
Secondary Criteria for Resource Allocation Decisions
6. Initiatives taken to generate revenue• E.g. Use of existing systems and infrastructure
within the University or the community to maximize net profit and increase resources available to address priority needs.
Submission Expectations
• Submissions for 2005-2009 closely tied to existing plans (e.g. Comprehensive Faculty Plans; Unit Reviews)
• Brief and to the point
• Narrative consists of Executive Summary (1-2 pages)
Planning & Resource Summary (3-4 pages, max 10)
Fund Raising Priorities
Planning & Resource Summary
Two elements:
1. Proposed Transfer to Re-Allocation Pool
2. Investment Proposals
Proposed 5% Transfer
• Describe outcomes expected• Short-term and long-term plans for changes
to delivery of programs or services• Accountability for internal re-allocation
rests with the Faculty/Unit• One-time costs part of re-allocation process• Expansion/ development of revenue
generation activities
Investment Proposals
• Prioritized listing of Faculty/Unit’s strategic investments over 4 years to respond to the Academic Plan
• Rank from “highest” to “lowest” priority
• Highlight key outcomes expected
• Includes Major capital infrastructure projects
Fund Raising Priorities
• Identify alignment with Academic Plan, Four Year Business Plan and the Faculty/Unit Business Plan
• Focus on priorities of $100,000 or greater
Financial Plan Instructions
• Detail for 2005-06 Completed by Budget/Admin Officer in
Cognos-Enterprise Planning Models (two components – a salary model, and a master model)
All sources (operating, reserves, special purpose, sponsored research)
• Financial implications of 3 year projections “Schedule 1” – high level impact
Questions ???
Contact Information:
Nicole Edge [email protected]
Abby Riviere [email protected]
Heather Darrah [email protected]
Donald Jantz [email protected]
Diana Moes [email protected]
Rick Mogensen [email protected]
Pam Parent [email protected]