the us-china trade conflict - ief...1. keep manufacturing jobs in the us 2. reduce us/china trade...

24
The US-China Trade Conflict Impacts and challenges to the global energy sector Aurangzeb Qureshi Energy Analyst International Energy Forum

Upload: others

Post on 15-Jul-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

The US-China Trade ConflictImpacts and challenges to the global energy sector

Aurangzeb QureshiEnergy AnalystInternational Energy Forum

Page 2: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

Contents

• Historical context

• US-China trade conflict

• Impact on China and US

• Impact on global energy sector

• The role of energy dialogue

Page 3: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

Historical Context

Page 4: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

Contemporary Examples (19thth century onwards)

• Anglo-Irish Trade War (1930s)• The Irish Government refused to continue reimbursing Britain with land annuities from

financial loans granted to Irish tenant farmers. This resulted in the imposition of unilateral trade restrictions by both countries.

• Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act (1930s)• A law that implemented protectionist trade policies in the United States. The act

raised US tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods to protect American jobs and farmers during the Great Depression.

• US-Japan Trade War (1980s)• Japan’s mid-century rise led to the country becoming an export powerhouse. As

Japanese cars flooded the U.S. market, intense pressure eventually led to the signing of a Voluntary Export Restraint (VER) agreement that limited sales in the United States.

Page 5: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

Contents

• Historical context

• US-China trade conflict

• Impact on China and US

• Impact on global energy sector

• The role of energy dialogue

Page 6: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

US China Trade Conflict

1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US

2. Reduce US/China trade deficit• Total US trade deficit = $621

billion• Total US trade deficit with

China= $419 billion = 67% of all US debt

3. Reduce debt• US owes China $1.13 trillion in

debt

Possible US motivations to implement tariffs

Source: US Census Bureau

Page 7: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

China Tariffs On US Exports By SectorSelective US industries targeted by China

Source: Peterson Institute for International Economics

Page 8: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

Source: Macrotrends.net

Oil Price Volatility Volatile pattern due to market shifts, trade conflict uncertainty, and news headlines

March 22, 2018 - Trump administration releases report outlining its complaints with China’s trade practices.

April 3, 4 2018 -Trump administration releases $50 billion list of Chinese products under consideration for 25% tariffs and China publishes 106 products as retaliation.

July 6, 2018 – US and China first phase tariffs go into effect.

July 10, 2018 – US releases a list of $200 billion of imports from China subject to a new 10% tariffs.

August 7, 8 2018 –US revises second phase of $50 billion list announcing that 16 billion of imports will be subject to 25% tariff going into effect August 23. China does the same.

August 23, 2018 – US and China impose second phase of $50 billion tariffs.

September 17, 18, 24 2018 –US and China finalize respective tariffs of $200 billion and $60 billion that go into effect September 24.

December 1, 2018 – US-China Tariff Truce. Both sides to reach deal by March 1st.

May 10, 2019– US raises tariff rate on imports previously hit by 10% to 25%

Aug. 1, 2019 – US announces tariffs on additional $300 billion of imports from China going into effect September 1 and December 15. Aug. 23, 2019 – China

retaliates on $75 billion of US exports effective September 1 and December 15. US announces increases to tariffs on August 1.

June 1, 2019 – China raises tariffs on $60 billion that went into effect in September 2018.

Source: Peterson Institute for International Economics

Page 9: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

Contents

• Historical context

• US-China trade conflict

• Impact on China and US

• Impact on global energy sector

• The role of energy dialogue

Page 10: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

China crude oil importsShowing impacts of trade tension and sanctions

Source: General Administration of Customs, China

Page 11: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

China total oil products importsVolatile trade pattern; an effect of trade dispute import tariffs

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

KBD China Total Oil Products Imports

Range 2014-2018 Avg 2014-2018 2018 2019

Source: JODI Oil

Page 12: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

China-US Trade Conflict

• Crudeo China placed a 5% tariff U.S. crude oil from Sept. 1, 2019, the first time U.S. oil is targeted since

the trade war.

• *LNGo China has imposed 10% duty on U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) since September 2018 and

then raised it to 25% in June.

• *Propaneo China imposed another 5% tariff on U.S. propane from Dec. 1, which adds to the 25% levied

since Aug. 23, 2018.

• *Polyethyleneo China placed 25% tariffs on three grades of US Polyethylene as part of the August 23 tariffs.

• Methanolo China has imposed tariffs of 25% since June on US methanol.

China also imposed a 25% tariff on coal, but this is largely metallurgical coal used for construction rather than energy.

Chinese Tariffs on US Energy Products

Page 13: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

US LNG Exports to China

Source: Chatham House (2018), ‘resourcetrade.earth’, http://resourcetrade.earth/

Fastest growing market for US from 2012-2017

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Total Weight (M Tons)478% increase from 2012-2017

Page 14: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

US LNG Exports to China

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

Jan-

2011

Apr-

2011

Jul-2

011

Oct

-201

1Ja

n-20

12Ap

r-20

12Ju

l-201

2O

ct-2

012

Jan-

2013

Apr-

2013

Jul-2

013

Oct

-201

3Ja

n-20

14Ap

r-20

14Ju

l-201

4O

ct-2

014

Jan-

2015

Apr-

2015

Jul-2

015

Oct

-201

5Ja

n-20

16Ap

r-20

16Ju

l-201

6O

ct-2

016

Jan-

2017

Apr-

2017

Jul-2

017

Oct

-201

7Ja

n-20

18Ap

r-20

18Ju

l-201

8O

ct-2

018

Jan-

2019

Apr-

2019

Vessels to China of U.S. LNG (Million Cubic Feet)

Source: US Energy Information Administration

Trade conflict affecting supplies 2018 onwards

Page 15: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

US Propane Exports to ChinaFastest growing market for US from 2012-2017

Source: Chatham House (2018), ‘resourcetrade.earth’, http://resourcetrade.earth/

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

3500000

4000000

4500000

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Total Weight (M tons) 103% increase from 2012-2017

Page 16: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

US Propane Exports to China

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Jan-

2008

May

-200

8Se

p-20

08Ja

n-20

09M

ay-2

009

Sep-

2009

Jan-

2010

May

-201

0Se

p-20

10Ja

n-20

11M

ay-2

011

Sep-

2011

Jan-

2012

May

-201

2Se

p-20

12Ja

n-20

13M

ay-2

013

Sep-

2013

Jan-

2014

May

-201

4Se

p-20

14Ja

n-20

15M

ay-2

015

Sep-

2015

Jan-

2016

May

-201

6Se

p-20

16Ja

n-20

17M

ay-2

017

Sep-

2017

Jan-

2018

May

-201

8Se

p-20

18Ja

n-20

19

US Exports to China of Propane (thousand barrels)

Source: US Energy Information Administration

Trade conflict affecting supplies 2018 onwards

Page 17: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

LNG Tariffs

Source: Chatham House (2018), ‘resourcetrade.earth’, http://resourcetrade.earth/

Implications for US and China

• Rebalancing of trade• China will seek to replace US LNG with traditional players including

Australia, Qatar, Russia and new players such as Canada• US will seek demand from Europe and Japan/Korea

• Uncertainty about new US LNG projects• Projects under development that cannot sell LNG to China are at a

competitive disadvantage. There is still potential to attract investment (Saudi investment in Port Arthur LNG)

• Long-term effects far more important• China will become largest LNG importer and will need to relay on US LNG

to diversify supply. • US exporters need to rely on Chinese demand in the future

Page 18: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

Propane TariffsImplications for US and China

Source: Chatham House (2018), ‘resourcetrade.earth’, http://resourcetrade.earth/

• Rebalancing of Trade• China buyers will seek to replace US propane with other players including

the UAE, Qatar, Algeria and Canada• May create alternative opportunities for US propane in other markets

• Greater leverage from importers will drive US propane prices down• US propane exporters will reduce prices to gain greater market share in

existing markets such as Japan and Korea

• Uncertainty on China PDH (propane dehydrogenation) industry• Future growth of PDH industry is highly dependent on US supply• 12 PHD projects in China will be added over the next five years – 6.5 million

tons of propane demand

Page 19: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

Polyethylene TariffsImplications for US and China

Source: Chatham House (2018), ‘resourcetrade.earth’, http://resourcetrade.earth/

• Rebalancing of Trade• China buyers will seek to replace US PE by forging closer ties to the Middle

East and India• US focusing on Southeast Asia, Europe and Africa

• Declining prices as a result of high PE output• A glut of supply and challenging export market puts downward pressure on

prices

• Uncertainty on new US PE US expansion• LLDPE and HDPE make up more than 90 percent of new US output

Page 20: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

Contents

• Historical context

• US-China trade conflict

• Impact on China and US

• Impact on global energy sector

• The role of energy dialogue

Page 21: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

Overall Global Energy Impacts

1. Volatile Oil Prices• Crude prices hit below $60 per barrel in August. WTI near-month crude oil futures fell

approximately 8 percent – the steepest fall in more than three years

2. Slowing Energy Demand• IEA and OPEC growth projections in August decreased from the month prior with total growth of

1.08 mb/d and 1.10 mb/d, respectively in 2019. Both OECD and Non-OECD demand growth fell to their lowest point this year in both forecasts

3. Decreased Energy Investment• Energy companies now forced to buy more expensive raw materials which can result in fewer

projects and lower investment. The lack of a Chinese market can impact expansion.

4. Reduced Optionality For Energy Exporters• US companies have to diversify exports due to tariffs on energy products including propane and

LNG – two of the fastest growing US exports

5. Globalization Challenges• The extent to which energy trade is dictated by protectionist policies undermines confidence in

trade and investment in an open energy market

Risk to the global economy, market stability, and sustainability

Page 22: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

Contents

• Historical context

• US-China trade conflict

• Impact on China and US

• Impact on global energy sector

• The role of energy dialogue

Page 23: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with

Mitigating challenges through Dialogue1. Energy diplomacy

• IEA-IEF-OPEC Trilateral is an example of how impact of geopolitical events can be softened through innovative arrangements and regional and international partnerships.

2. Data sharing and increasing transparency• Allows the possibility to proactively manage the energy market by keeping tabs on global supply/demand. JODI

data collaboration has offered new insights into non-OECD inventories.

3. Technology Cooperation• Collaboration on renewable and clean technologies such as CCUS, future role of hydrogen and finding efficiencies

through digitalisation and artificial intelligence can accelerate the orderly energy transition and provide more energy options.

Page 24: The US-China Trade Conflict - IEF...1. Keep manufacturing jobs in the US 2. Reduce US/China trade deficit • Total US trade deficit = $621 billion • Total US trade deficit with