the value propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 ·...
TRANSCRIPT
The ValueProposition
Kingspan CostOptimal EnergySaving BuildingSolutions
2
The ValueProposition
Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutionsprovide many compelling advantages to the different property stakeholders:they consume less energy, they emit less carbon dioxide and they areenvironmentally responsible over their lifetime, but the perception is that thesetypes of buildings carry substantial capital cost premiums.
Kingspan Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions can deliver minimumcapital and lifetime operation costs for a building.
LessCapital Cost
HigherReturn on
Investment
Building designsthat reduce bothwhole building capitalcost and lifecycleoperational cost.
What are Cost Optimal EnergySaving Building Solutions?
3
Contents
The Value Proposition 4
The Green Agenda 10Why do we need Cost Optimal EnergySaving Building Solutions?
Property Stakeholder Advantages 10Who Benefits?
Route to Net-Zero Energy Buildings 12Three-step Process 14
A ‘Holistic’ Design Approach 16
Exemplar Case Studies 17Retail Warehouse 18Large Supermarket 20Speculative Office 22Distribution Warehouse 24
Green Building Ratings 26BREEAM 26LEED 27
HigherRental Income
EnhancedGreen Building
Ratings
Reduced Heating and
Cooling Loads LowerLifetime
Operating Costs
The ValueProposition
4
Kingspan CostOptimal Energy SavingBuilding Solutionscan offer...
For over 40 years, we at Kingspan Insulated Panels have pushedthe boundaries of the building envelope, creating the world’smost advanced, high performance systems.Through our knowledge and innovation and world-class technical expertise, we can providefuture-proofed Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions to help architects and designteams realise affordable, energy efficient and sustainable buildings.
Sample reports carried out by AECOM, along with advice onhow Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions can beachieved, are available from Kingspan Technical Services on:
t: 0800 587 0090e: [email protected]
The ValueProposition
5
less capital cost...Kingspan has proven that the integration of an enhanced building envelopewith a holistic design approach that identifies the most cost-effective wholebuilding specification, often results in a reduction in capital cost.
with a higher returnon investment...Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions that have a capital cost uplift providesignificant operational cost reductions and offer rapid return on investment.
6
The ValueProposition
lifetime operationalcost savings...Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions feature envelope systems thatmaintain their thermal performance over time, limiting the occupiers’ exposure toescalating operating costs over the lifetime of the building.
7
The ValueProposition
8
The ValueProposition
a future-proofedbuilding...Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions drive higher rental income, maximiseoccupancy levels, reduce operating costs, enhance asset value and minimise the riskof rising fuel costs to provide ‘future-proofed’ buildings.
and enhancedBREEAM/LEEDratings.Additional BREEAM / LEED credits can be achieved, enhancing green buildingcredentials and providing market differentiation.
9
The ValueProposition
10
The UK needs Cost Optimal Energy SavingBuildings to minimise the financial impact ofrising fuel costs in buildings therefore it isessential to reduce lifetime operational costs.
People cause buildings to consume energy. We spend
approximately 90% of our life in buildings. The UK aims to cut
greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80%, from the 1990
baseline by 2050.
Buildings in the UK account for almost 40% of the greenhouse gas
emissions released in the UK’s atmosphere. Building Regulations
Part L 2013 have implemented a 9% improvement in allowable
carbon emissions over the 2010 standard for non-domestic
buildings. From April 2018 it will be unlawful to let commercial
properties with an EPC rating of F or G (the lowest two grades of
energy efficiency). BREEAM requirements are becoming mandatory
for some councils in the UK while other property owners are
stipulating their own BREEAM requirements.
Transportation
24%
Exports
3%
Waste
3%
Agriculture& Land Use
9%Industry
23%
UK sector carbonemissions:
The building sector isthe largest producer ofcarbon dioxide in the
United Kingdom.Source: www.gov.uk.
Buildings
38%
Why do we need Cost OptimalEnergy Saving Building Solutions?
Therefore, the need to reduce energy consumption and carbon
emissions are significant issues for businesses. Holistic building
design, sustainable construction and the optimal operation of
buildings are now the top priority of regulatory, property investment,
tenant and individual corporate agendas.
UK Gas Price Forecast
0.0002010
Normalised Ofgem average
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055Years
£/kW
h
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.060
0.070
UK Electricity Price Forecast
0.0002010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055
Years
£/kW
h
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
National Grid Normalised Ofgem average National Grid
The GreenAgenda
11
WhoBenefits?
Source, modified: “The Business Case for Green Building.A Review of the Costs and Benefits for Developers, Investorsand Occupants.” World Green Building Council, 2013.
Property StakeholderAdvantages
Higherselling price
Lower designand construction
costs
Marketdifferentiation
Fastersales
Improved healthand reducedabsenteeism
Increased staffproductivity
OccupiercomfortReduced
downtime
Loweroperational
costs
Lowermaintenance
costs
Slowerdepreciation
Abilityto securefinance
Lowerrefurbishment /
renovation costs
Enhancedbusiness image
Legislation (EPC)& CSR compliance
Lowertransaction
fees
Rapid ROI
Increasedmarket value
Reduced vacancies
Lower exit yield
Increasedoccupancy rates
DeveloperWhy should I build a Cost OptimalEnergy Saving Building?
Tenant / OccupierWhy should I lease a Cost OptimalEnergy Saving Building?
OwnerWhy would I want to own aCost Optimal Energy Saving Building?
12
Part LRegulatory Compliance
20%Carbon Reduction
40%Carbon Reduction
BREEAM†
Pass > Good > Very Good
LEED Certified
LEED Silver
LEED Gold
BREEAM†
ExcellentBREEAM†
Outstanding
EnvelopeFirst &Optimised Building Services
■ Building type, orientation and location.
■ Optimal envelope considering
- Thermal: U-values, airtightness and thermal bridges.
- Daylighting: heat loss, solar gain and daylight factor.
■ Optimal building services considering lighting design,heating system, cooling system, hot water and BuildingManagement System (controls).
■ Insulation to help further reduce heat loss/gainconsidering the envelope insulation and the internalbuilding services insulation (e.g. duct/pipe insulation).
■ Installation of Low or Zero Carbon (LZC) technologiessuch as solar photovoltaics*, solar air heating*,solar thermal*, heat pump technology*, wind turbines*and combined heat and power (CHP), etc.
*Available from Kingspan.
STEP
1Insulate & GenerateIntegrated LZC Technologies
STEP
2
Route to Net-ZeroEnergy Buildings
†BREEAM UK New Construction 2011 Method.
Part L2010 Compliant Part L
2013 Compliant 20%Less Carbon 40%
Less Carbon
13
50%Carbon Reduction
Net-Zero EnergyBuildings
LEED Platinum
■ Enhance LZC technologies already installed.
■ Introduce other LZC technologies.
■ Invest in off-site energy saving schemes(known as ‘allowable solutions’ in the UK).
Net-Zero EnergyBuildings
STEP
3
We have now entered into an era of energyefficiency and financial returns, where energysaving buildings are designed, constructed,operated and maintained with minimal cost.
Energy efficiency must always be addressed before considering
renewable energy. In order to achieve a cost optimal energy saving
building design it is essential that annual energy consumption is
minimised before incorporating low or zero carbon technologies.
“By applying Kingspan’s three-stepprocess of EnvelopeFirst &Optimised Building Services,Insulate & Generate and Net-ZeroEnergy Buildings, it is possible toachieve a Cost Optimal EnergySaving Building Solution.”
Route to Net-ZeroEnergy Buildings
Pushingthe Envelope
50%Less Carbon
BREEAMLEED
Net-ZeroEnergy Building
14
The first step, EnvelopeFirst & Optimised Building Services,
optimises the insulation, airtightness, heat loss/gain and daylight
design of the building envelope for its intended life, while also
ensuring the building’s services are geared to energy efficient
operation. It is of utmost importance that the building envelope is
appropriate before embarking on other energy efficient measures
as the building envelope tends to last the life of the building.
It is mandatory to get the design correct to ensure low operational
cost for the entire lifetime of the building.
The envelope must offer thermal performance suitable to the local
climate but it is not just the building envelope that must be
considered at this stage, it is important to take a holistic approach
to energy efficiency of internal plant. Important elements such as a
building’s daylighting design must always be carefully considered,
taking location and climate into account. Kingspan’s daylighting
systems can be incorporated into building designs to further
decrease energy consumption, by reducing the need for electric
lighting.
Taking a holistic approach, the envelope and the internal heating
and cooling system should be designed simultaneously while
always considering cost. The size of the heating and cooling
system depends very much on the building envelope and it has
been found that improving the efficiency of the building envelope
reduces the size of internal systems and hence reduces their cost.
This also results in heating/cooling energy consumption reduction.
This approach often results in a lower capital cost for the building
envelope and heating/cooling system combined.
Energy efficient internal building services with intelligent controls
should also be included at this stage. Kingspan Insulated Panels’
building envelope products and solutions provide enhanced
thermal conductivity with low air permeability to ensure thermal
performance robustness throughout the building’s lifecycle.
The wide range of Kingspan roof, wall and façade insulated panel
systems, including daylighting, come in various colours and finishes
to suit any design requirement.
EnvelopeFirst& Optimised Building Services
The second step is called ‘Insulate & Generate’. At this stage,
additional enhancements to the building envelope and/or internal
duct/pipework are introduced and low or zero carbon technology
systems are added to further reduce its overall energy footprint.
Low or zero carbon technologies such as Kingspan Roof Mounted
PV Systems are perfectly suited to help reduce energy bills for
buildings with large roof area. Likewise, Kingspan Sol-Air, a thermal
air heating insulated panel system that channels passive solar heat
gain into the heating system, hence reducing its energy
consumption, is perfectly suited for buildings with fresh air
requirements. Other buildings may require different solutions,
including solar thermal, wind and even heat pump technologies,
all of which are available from one of the other divisions of
Kingspan.
The energy saving solutions selected at this stage depend on a
number of variables including cost-effectiveness, building type,
internal demands, orientation, geographical location and climate.
Insulate & Generate- Integrated LZC Technologies
STEP
1STEP
2
Three-stepProcess
Route to Net-ZeroEnergy Buildings
“Building insulation is the mostcost-effective solution to reduceenergy and greenhouse gases.”
Source: McKinsey Global Institute.
15
The final step is called ‘Net-Zero Energy Buildings’. The purpose of
this stage is to ensure that the overall annual performance of the
building balances out. This usually involves enhancing the
renewable energy technologies already incorporated in the building,
and may require investment in off-site energy saving schemes
called ‘allowable solutions’ in the UK.
Net-Zero Energy Buildings(NZEBs)
STEP
3
Three-stepProcess
Route to Net-ZeroEnergy Buildings
For business and building owners Kingspan Energy, a sub-division
of Kingspan Insulated Panels, offers the opportunity to maximise
the use of the roof space thus reducing their energy costs and
enhancing the value of their property without the need for any upfront
capital outlay. The 100% funded solution provided by Kingspan
Energy involves no upfront cost or capital risk to the end client.*
Effectively, in return for a 25 year lease on the roof space,
Kingspan Energy will 100% capitally fund, design, project-manage,
install and maintain a bespoke optimised Roof Mounted PV System.
The electricity generated by the system will be available to the host
company at lower rates than would otherwise be supplied from
the grid. As a result, the client will have the advantage of fixed
electricity costs, indexed to RPI (Retail Price Index), rather than
being exposed to volatile annual utility inflation rates.
*Note: the client is also able to self-fund the investment if preferred.
Having applied the steps above to reach a given target it is
necessary to calculate the lifetime operational cost by incorporating
the cost associated to rising fuel costs and replacement of internal
plant (keeping in mind an improved fabric will reduce the cost of
internal plant). If the process is completed to reach different carbon
targets it is then possible to calculate a Return on Investment (ROI),
Net-Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR).
Client Commitment:Client provides rooftoplease to Kingspan Energyfor 25 years.
Our Commitment:100% capital funding forthe rooftop solar PV system.
Provide 25 year combinedKingspan roof and solar PVsystem guarantee.
System performance andmaintenance.
Client Benefits:Reduced electricity costsfrom Day One.
Future-proofed energy costsin line with RPI inflation index.
25 year combined Kingspanroof and solar PV systemguarantee.
Our Benefits:25 year client rooftop lease.
Government Green TariffIncentive.
Income from Power Purchase Agreements (PPA)- client and utility.
16
Holistic Building Design Inputs
Holistic building design concentrates on the design of the whole building rather thanjust focusing on a specific area, such as the design of the building envelope only.
Using a multidisciplinary collaboration approach it is possible to
design more accurately, more efficiently and at optimum cost.
For example, enhancing the building envelope provides the
opportunity to downsize internal building services, thereby often
reducing the capital cost for the whole building when costs
associated to the reduced plant size exceed the costs associated
to the enhanced envelope.
Holistic design is mandatory to reduce to a minimum the amount
of energy consumed. It is essential that various elements of a
building are designed in parallel to minimise unnecessary energy
consumption over the buildings lifecycle.
A ‘Holistic’Design Approach
“The building envelope is critical for reducingbuilding energy loads. It is the starting pointfor energy efficient buildings and the maindeterminant of the amount of energy requiredto heat, cool and ventilate.”Federal R&D Agenda for Net-Zero Energy,High-Performance Green Buildings Report, October 2008.
Geographicallocation
Buildingorientation
Buildingenvelope
Demands(zones)
Coolingsystem
Auxillary(fans, pumps,
etc)
Heatingsystem
Lightingdesign
Hot watersystem
Low / zerocarbon
technologies
17
The calculations were based on four different building types:
Retail Warehouse, Speculative Office, Large Supermarket and
Distribution Warehouse, in three locations: London, Manchester
and Newcastle.
Each scenario was calculated using three starting building fabric
standards: backstop, notional and enhanced.
Backstop: Less InsulationRoof = 0.25 W/m2K / Wall = 0.35 W/m2K
Notional: Medium InsulationRoof = 0.18 W/m2K / Wall = 0.26 W/m2K
Enhanced: More Insulation Roof = 0.15 W/m2K / Wall = 0.20 W/m2K
Results are dependent on various parameters such as building
type, location, orientation, etc.
Having applied an envelope, a building specification is assigned
based on cost-effectiveness (applying the most cost-effective
changes first) to develop the capital cost model. Lifetime
operational costs are then calculated. It is then possible to
recognise financial benefits of various building specifications over
others in terms of Net-Present Value (NPV), Return on Investment
(ROI) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR).
Kingspan Insulated Panels has carried out extensive research in conjunction with AECOM,a world leading building design consultancy, to identify the positive impact of more efficientbuilding envelopes for buildings in various parts of the UK.
ExemplarCase Studies
Return on Investment (ROI) is a performance measure used to
evaluate the efficiency of an investment, or to compare the
efficiency of a number of different investments. To calculate ROI,
the benefit (return) of an investment (net of initial cost of investment)
is divided by the cost of the investment; the result is expressed as a
percentage or a ratio.
Net Present Value (NPV) is the difference between the present
value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows.
NPV is used in capital budgeting to analyze the profitability of an
investment or project.
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is the discount rate often used in
capital budgeting that makes the net present value of all cash flows
from a particular project equal to zero. Generally speaking,
the higher a project’s internal rate of return, the more desirable it is
to undertake the project. As such, IRR can be used to rank several
prospective projects a firm is considering. Assuming all other
factors are equal among the various projects, the project with the
highest IRR would probably be considered the best and
undertaken first.
For further information see:
http://www.kingspanpanels.co.uk/why-kingspan/value-
proposition/
Holistic Building Design Methodology
Developcapital costmodel
Developwhole lifecost model
Rank buildingimprovements
in order of cost-effectiveness
IdentifyCost Optimal
Energy SavingBuildingSolution
Developmodels foreach of the
54 scenarios:3 locations
6 carbon targets3 envelopestandards
Developthermalmodel
Select building type,location and orientation
Enhance
d
Capital Cost: £3.508m
Enhance
d
Capital C
ost: £3.5
09m
18
Part L 2010Regulatory Compliance
Part L 2013Regulatory Compliance
20%Carbon Reduction
18
ExemplarCase Studies
RetailWarehouse
Capital: £3.508mkgCO2/m2/yr: 32.7EPC: B28BREEAM* Ene 01: 4
Capital: £3.509mkgCO2/m2/yr: 30.1EPC: B26BREEAM* Ene 01: 6
Capital: £3.562mkgCO2/m2/yr: 26.0EPC: A22BREEAM* Ene 01: 11
Backs
top
Capital C
ost: £3.6
14m
Enhance
d
Capital C
ost: £3.5
62m
1.4% reduced capital costand NPV up to £213,046over 40 years
■ Capital Cost: £1,000 increase■ NPV: Up to £17/m2 (40 years)■ IRR: Up to 321%■ ROI: Up to 10,744.9%■ EPC: From B28 to B26■ BREEAM Ene 01: From 4 to 6 credits
Building ParametersHeated (20°C) and cooled (23°C), 8am to 6pm,7 days per week with a floor area of 4,900m2.Located in London.
Typical Retail Warehouse Buildinggoing from Part L 2010 to
Part L 2013using an enhanced envelopeachieves the following:
*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011. For LEED contributions, please contact Kingspan Technical Department.
19
40%Carbon Reduction
50%Carbon Reduction
Net-Zero EnergyBuilding
19
ExemplarCase Studies
RetailWarehouse
Capital: £3.754mkgCO2/m2/yr: 19.6EPC: A17BREEAM* Ene 01: 13
Capital: £3.805mkgCO2/m2/yr: 16.3EPC: A14BREEAM* Ene 01: 14
Capital: £3.923mkgCO2/m2/yr: 0EPC: **BREEAM* Ene 01: **
**Confirmation of the impact of allowable solutions on EPCs and BREEAM credits is awaited.
Part L2010
Part L2013
20%improvement
40%improvement
50%improvement
NZEB
Carbon Emissions
Compliance
Cap
ital
Co
st (£
m)
Car
bo
n (k
gC
O2/
m2 /
yr)
3.30
3.40
3.50
3.60
3.70
3.80
3.90
4.00
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Capital Cost
20
ExemplarCase Studies
LargeSupermarket
Capital: £3.511mkgCO2/m2/yr: 35.9EPC: B32BREEAM* Ene 01: 0
Capital: £3.525mkgCO2/m2/yr: 33.0EPC: B30BREEAM* Ene 01: 4
Capital: £3.575mkgCO2/m2/yr: 28.8EPC: B26BREEAM* Ene 01: 8
*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011. For LEED contributions, please contact Kingspan Technical Department.
Enhance
d
Capital Cost: £3.511m
Enhance
d
Capital C
ost: £3.5
25m
Part L 2010Regulatory Compliance
Part L 2013Regulatory Compliance
20%Carbon Reduction
Backs
top
Capital C
ost: £3.6
18m
Enhance
d
Capital C
ost: £3.5
75m
1.2% reduced capital costand NPV up to £292,088over 40 years
■ Capital Cost: £14,000 increase■ NPV: Up to £9/m2 (40 years)■ IRR: Up to 16.7%■ ROI: Up to 223.7%■ EPC: From B32 to B30■ BREEAM Ene 01: From 0 to 4 credits
Building ParametersHeated (20°C) and cooled (23°C), 8am to 6pm,7 days per week with a floor area of 5,100m2.Located in Newcastle.
Typical Large Supermarket Buildinggoing from Part L 2010 to
Part L 2013using an enhanced envelopeachieves the following:
21
ExemplarCase Studies
LargeSupermarket
Capital: £3.796mkgCO2/m2/yr: 21.5EPC: A20BREEAM* Ene 01: 11
Capital: £3.883mkgCO2/m2/yr: 17.9EPC: A16BREEAM* Ene 01: 11
Capital: £4.017mkgCO2/m2/yr: 0EPC: **BREEAM* Ene 01: **
40%Carbon Reduction
50%Carbon Reduction
Net-Zero EnergyBuilding
Part L2010
Part L2013
20%improvement
40%improvement
50%improvement
NZEB
Carbon Emissions
Compliance
Cap
ital
Co
st (£
m)
Car
bo
n (k
gC
O2/
m2 /
yr)
3.20
3.30
3.40
3.50
3.60
3.70
3.80
3.90
4.20
4.10
4.00
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
50
45
40
35
Capital Cost
**Confirmation of the impact of allowable solutions on EPCs and BREEAM credits is awaited.
2222
ExemplarCase Studies
SpeculativeOffice
Capital: £3.120mkgCO2/m2/yr: 20.4EPC: B35BREEAM* Ene 01: 0
Capital: £3.142mkgCO2/m2/yr: 18.0EPC: B31BREEAM* Ene 01: 6
Capital: £3.178mkgCO2/m2/yr: 16.3EPC: B30BREEAM* Ene 01: 8
*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011. For LEED contributions, please contact Kingspan Technical Department.
Enhance
d
Capital Cost: £3.120m
Enhance
d
Capital C
ost: £3.1
42m
Part L 2010Regulatory Compliance
Part L 2013Regulatory Compliance
20%Carbon Reduction
■ Capital Cost: £22,000 increase■ NPV: Up to £10/m2 (40 years)■ IRR: Up to 12.5%■ ROI: Up to 112.6%■ EPC: From B35 to B31■ BREEAM Ene 01: From 0 to 6 credits
Building ParametersHeated (22°C) and cooled (24°C), 7am to 7pm,5 days per week with a floor area of 4,500m2
(3 floors). Located in Manchester.
Typical Speculative Office Buildinggoing from Part L 2010 to
Part L 2013using an enhanced envelopeachieves the following:
2323
ExemplarCase Studies
SpeculativeOffice
Capital: £3.247mkgCO2/m2/yr: 12.2EPC: A23BREEAM* Ene 01: 11
Capital: £3.275mkgCO2/m2/yr: 10.2EPC: A19BREEAM* Ene 01: 12
Capital: £3.342mkgCO2/m2/yr: 0EPC: **BREEAM* Ene 01: **
40%Carbon Reduction
50%Carbon Reduction
Net-Zero EnergyBuilding
Backs
top
Capital C
ost: £3.2
35m
Enhance
d
Capital C
ost: £3.2
47m
7.8% reduction inboiler size
Part L2010
Part L2013
20%improvement
40%improvement
50%improvement
NZEB
Carbon Emissions
Compliance
Cap
ital
Co
st (£
m)
Car
bo
n (k
gC
O2/
m2 /
yr)
2.95
3.00
3.05
3.10
3.15
3.20
3.25
3.30
3.40
3.35
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
27
24
21
Capital Cost
**Confirmation of the impact of allowable solutions on EPCs and BREEAM credits is awaited.
ExemplarCase Studies
DistributionWarehouse
24
Capital: £1.486mkgCO2/m2/yr: 24.5EPC: A24BREEAM* Ene 01: 0
Capital: £1.486mkgCO2/m2/yr: 23.5EPC: A23BREEAM* Ene 01: 2
Capital: £1.562mkgCO2/m2/yr: 19.6EPC: A19BREEAM* Ene 01: 7
*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011. For LEED contributions, please contact Kingspan Technical Department.
Enhance
d
Capital Cost: £1.486m
Enhance
d
Capital C
ost: £1.4
86m
Part L 2010Regulatory Compliance
Part L 2013Regulatory Compliance
20%Carbon Reduction
■ Capital Cost: £0 increase■ NPV: Up to £9/m2 (40 years)■ IRR: No cost■ ROI: No cost■ EPC: From A24 to A23■ BREEAM Ene 01: From 0 to 2 credits
Building ParametersHeated (18°C), no cooling, 24 hours per day,7 days per week with a floor area of 4,900m2.Located in Newcastle.
Typical Distribution WarehouseBuilding going from Part L 2010 to
Part L 2013using an enhanced envelopeachieves the following:
ExemplarCase Studies
25
DistributionWarehouse
Capital: £1.644mkgCO2/m2/yr: 14.7EPC: A14BREEAM* Ene 01: 10
Capital: £1.679mkgCO2/m2/yr: 12.2EPC: A12BREEAM* Ene 01: 11
Capital: £1.768mkgCO2/m2/yr: 0EPC: **BREEAM* Ene 01: **
40%Carbon Reduction
50%Carbon Reduction
Net-Zero EnergyBuilding
Backs
top
Capital C
ost: £1.6
53m
Enhance
d
Capital C
ost: £1.6
79m
8.7% reduction inenergy consumption
Part L2010
Part L2013
20%improvement
40%improvement
50%improvement
NZEB
Carbon Emissions
Compliance
Cap
ital
Co
st (£
m)
Car
bo
n (k
gC
O2/
m2 /
yr)
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.80
1.70
1.60
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Capital Cost
**Confirmation of the impact of allowable solutions on EPCs and BREEAM credits is awaited.
26
Kingspan Insulated Panels’ products can help achieve credits in the
following categories:
Materials■ Green Guide Ratings of A+.
■ Compliance with ISO 14001:2004 demonstrating that productscontain responsibly sourced materials.
■ Environmental Profiling by the Building Research Establishment(BRE) for certain products.
Energy ■ Reduction of carbon emissions and energy consumption.
■ Photovoltaic systems.
Health & Wellbeing■ Free from Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC’s) emissions.
■ Daylighting and lighting solutions.
■ High performance accoustic solutions and advice.
Waste■ Pallets, plastic packaging, etc, collected from site after delivery,helping reduce on-site waste during construction.
Pollution■ Reduction of NOx emissons from buildings.
■ Gutter/rainwater design calculations.
Innovation■ Various innovation credits particularly in the ‘Energy’ category.
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental
Assessment Method) is the world’s leading environmental
assessment procedure.
BREEAM* is divided into 10 categories, each carrying different
weightings.
“Recent analysis has shownthat Kingspan Insulated Panels’products can contributedirectly up to 28% of creditsunder BREEAM and up to 27of the 110 points availablewithin LEED accreditation.”
Green BuildingRatings BREEAM
Water
6%
Management
12%
Transport
8%
Materials
12.5%
Waste
7.5%
Land Use& Ecology
10% Health &Wellbeing
15%
Pollution
10%
Energy
19%
An additional 10% is awarded to innovation.
*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011.
27
Kingspan Insulated Panels’ products can help achieve credits in the
following categories:
Materials & Resources■ 100% reusable.
■ Pallets, plastic packaging, etc, collected on site after delivery, helping reduce waste on site during construction.
■ Insulated Panels typically contain 14.5% to 17.5% recycledcontent.
■ Approved environmental profiling available for most products.
Energy & Atmosphere ■ Reduction of carbon emissions and energy consumption.
■ Photovoltaic systems.
Indoor Environmental Quality■ Free from Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC’s) emissions.
■ Daylighting and lighting solutions.
■ High performance accoustic solutions and advice.
Sustainable Sites■ Envelope solutions with high solar reflective coatings.
■ Gutter/rainwater design calculations.
Innovation in Design■ LEED Accredited Professionals (LEED AP) working in thebusiness.
■ Products eligible for innovation on a project specific bases.
LEED v4 (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design),
is the world’s second most widely adopted environmental
assessment method.
LEED is divided into 8 categories, again, each carrying different
weightings.
Green BuildingRatings LEED
Sustainable Sites
10 pts
IntegrativeProcess
1 pt
Innovationin Design
6 pts
Materials &Resources
13 pts
IndoorEnvironmental
Quality
16 pts
Location &Transportation
16 ptsWaterEfficiency
11 pts
RegionalPriority
4 pts
Energy &Atmosphere
33 pts
05/2014
Care has been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate, but Kingspan Limited and its subsidiary companies do not accept responsibility for errorsor for information that is found to be misleading. Suggestions for, or description of, the end use or application of products or methods of working are for information onlyand Kingspan Limited and its subsidiaries accept no liability in respect thereof.
Kingspan LimitedGreenfield Business Park No. 2, Greenfield, Holywell, Flintshire, North Wales CH8 7GJt: +44 (0) 1352 717232 f: +44 (0) 1352 710161 www.kingspanpanels.co.uk
For the product offering in other markets please contact your local sales representative or visit www.kingspanpanels.com