the vietnam war - mrs. hulsey's class · 1946 french-vietminh war begins 772 chapter 25 the...

770

TheVietnam War

1954–1975

1954• Vietminh defeat French

• Geneva Accords signed1964• Congress passes Gulf

of Tonkin Resolution

1955• Khrushchev is

dominant leaderin USSR 1958

• De Gaulle heads France’sFifth Republic

1964• Japan introduces first

high-speed passenger train

Why It MattersThe Vietnam War created very bitter divisions within the United States. Supporters argued that

patriotism demanded that communism be halted. Opponents argued that intervening in Vietnamwas immoral. Many young people protested or resisted the draft. Victory was not achieved,

although more than 58,000 American soldiers died. After the war, the nation had many woundsto heal.

The Impact TodayChanges brought about by the war are still evident in the United States today.

• The nation is reluctant to commit troops overseas.• The War Powers Act limits a president’s power to involve the nation in war.

The American Republic Since 1877 Video The Chapter 25 video, “Vietnam: A Different War,” explores the causes and the impact of this longest war in American history.

!

"

!

""

1965• U.S. combat troops

arrive in Vietnam

!

1955 1960 1965

Eisenhower1953–1961

Kennedy1961–1963

L. Johnson1963–1969

771

1968• Tet offensive

• Students protest atDemocratic NationalConvention inChicago

1975• Evacuation of last

Americans from Vietnam

1968• Soviets repress

Czechoslovakia’s rebellion1975• Civil war breaks

out in Angola

The dedication ceremony for the Vietnam Veterans Memorialin Washington, D.C., November 13, 1982

!!!

" "

1970• National Guard troops kill

students at Kent StateUniversity

1967• First heart

transplantperformed

"1971• Pakistani civil war leads to

independent Bangladesh

"

1967• March on the

Pentagon takes place

1970 1975

Ford1974–1977!

Nixon1969–1974

1973• Cease-fire signed

with North Vietnam

!

HISTORY

Chapter OverviewVisit the American RepublicSince 1877 Web site at

and click on Chapter Overviews—Chapter 25 to preview chapterinformation.

tarvol2.glencoe.com

1946French-VietminhWar begins

772 CHAPTER 25 The Vietnam War

#1958

In 1965 the first major battle between American and North Vietnamese soldiers took placein the Ia Drang Valley in South Vietnam. During the battle, a platoon of American soldiers wascut off and surrounded. Lieutenant Joe Marm’s platoon was among those sent to rescue thetrapped Americans. When his men came under heavy fire, Marm acted quickly: “I told themen to hold their fire. . . . Then I ran forward. . . . That’s the principle we use in the infantry,‘Lead by your own example.’” Marm raced across open ground and hurled grenades at theenemy, and although he was shot in the jaw, he managed to kill the troops firing at his men.For his extraordinary bravery, Lieutenant Marm received the Medal of Honor:

“I feel I’m the recipient of the medal for the many, many brave soldiers whose deeds gounsung. . . [T]he medal is as much theirs as it is mine. It’s always tough to get men to go intobattle, but we were a tight unit, and there were Americans out there that we were trying toget to. We’re all in it together, and we were fighting for each other and for our guys. . . . I hadthe best soldiers. . . . They were fearless, and they were just great Americans and they’regoing to go down in history.” —quoted in The Soldiers’ Story

Early American Involvement in VietnamIn the late 1940s and early 1950s, most Americans knew little about Vietnam. During

this time, however, American officials came to view the nation as increasingly importantin the campaign to halt the spread of communism.

The United StatesFocuses on Vietnam

1950The United States suppliesmilitary aid to France

1954Vietminh defeat French at Dien BienPhu; Geneva Accords signed in Paris

1956Ngo Dinh Diem refuses to participatein nationwide elections in Vietnam

#1946 #1950 #1954

Lieutenant Joe Marm

Main IdeaAmerican efforts to stop the spread ofcommunism led to U.S. involvement inthe affairs of Vietnam.

Key Terms and NamesHo Chi Minh, domino theory, guerrilla,Dien Bien Phu, Ngo Dinh Diem

Reading StrategyOrganizing As you read about theincreasing involvement of the UnitedStates in Vietnam, complete a graphicorganizer similar to the one below byproviding reasons that the United Statesaided France in Vietnam.

Reading Objectives• Describe the nationalist motives of

Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh.• Explain the origins of American involve-

ment in Vietnam during the 1950s.

Section ThemeGovernment and Democracy Americaninvolvement in Vietnam was a reflectionof Cold War strategy.Reasons for U.S.

Support of France

The Growth of Vietnamese Nationalism Whenthe Japanese seized power in Vietnam during WorldWar II, it was one more example of foreigners rulingthe Vietnamese people. China had controlled theregion off and on for hundreds of years. From the late1800s until World War II, France ruled Vietnam andneighboring Laos and Cambodia—a region knowncollectively as French Indochina.

By the early 1900s, nationalism had become a pow-erful force in Vietnam. The Vietnamese formed severalpolitical parties to push for independence or reform ofthe French colonial government. One of the leaders ofthe nationalist movement was Nguyen Tat Thanh—better known by his alias, Ho Chi Minh, or “Bringer ofLight.” He was born in 1890 in central Vietnam. As ayoung man, Ho Chi Minh taught at a village school. Atthe age of 21, he sailed for Europe on a Frenchfreighter, paying his passage by working in the galley.During his travels abroad, including a stay in theSoviet Union, Ho Chi Minh became an advocate ofcommunism. In 1930 he returned to Southeast Asia,where he helped found the Indochinese CommunistParty and worked to overthrow French rule.

Ho Chi Minh’s activities made him a wanted man.He fled Indochina and spent several years in exile inthe Soviet Union and China. In 1941 he returned toVietnam. By then Japan had seized control of thecountry. Ho Chi Minh organized a nationalist groupcalled the Vietminh. The group united bothCommunists and non-Communists in the struggle to

expel the Japanese forces. Soon afterward, the UnitedStates began sending military aid to the Vietminh.

The United States Supports the French With theAllies’ victory over Japan in August 1945, theJapanese surrendered control of Indochina. Ho ChiMinh and his forces quickly announced that Vietnamwas an independent nation. He even crafted aVietnam Declaration of Independence. ArchimedesPatti, an American officer stationed in Vietnam at thetime, helped the rebel leader write the document.When a translator read aloud the opening—“All menare created equal; they are endowed by their Creatorwith certain inalienable rights; among these are liberty, life, and the pursuit of happiness”—Patti sud-denly sat up, startled, recognizing the words as verysimilar to the American Declaration of Independence.

N

S

EW

Miller Cylindrical projection200 kilometers0

200 miles0

100°E

10°N

20°N

17°N

Gulf ofTonkin

Gulf ofThailand South

China Sea

THAILANDNever a European

colony

CAMBODIA1954

LAOS1954

NORTHVIETNAM

1954

SOUTHVIETNAM

1954

C H I N A

BURMA1948

Vientiane

Hanoi

Bangkok

Rangoon

PhnomPenh

Saigon

Indochina, 1959

Rural Economy Most of Vietnam’s people live in the country’s low-lyingfertile lands near the Red River delta in the north and the Mekong Riverdelta in the south. What does the image below suggest about the useof human labor in the country’s agricultural economy?

History

Date of independence1954

1. Interpreting Maps What three countries border Northand South Vietnam?

2. Applying Geography Skills A mountain chain extendsnearly 800 miles (1,290 km) from North to SouthVietnam. How do you think this terrain aided theVietnamese guerrillas who were fighting U.S. troops?

“I stopped him and turned to Ho in amazementand asked if he really intended to use it in his decla-ration. . . . Ho sat back in his chair, his palmstogether with fingertips touching his lips ever solightly, as though meditating. Then, with a gentlesmile he asked softly, ‘Should I not use it?’ I feltsheepish and embarrassed. Of course, I answered,why should he not?”

—quoted in The Perfect War

France, however, had no intention of seeingVietnam become independent. Seeking to regain theircolonial empire in Southeast Asia, French troopsreturned to Vietnam in 1946 and drove the Vietminhforces into hiding in the countryside. By 1949 Frenchofficials had set up a new government in Vietnam.

The Vietminh fought back against the French-dominated regime and slowly increased their controlover large areas of the countryside. As fightingbetween the two sides escalated, France appealed tothe United States for help.

The request put American officials in a difficultposition. The United States opposed colonialism. Ithad pressured the Dutch to give up their empire inIndonesia, and it supported the British decision to giveIndia independence in 1947. In Vietnam, however, theindependence movement had become entangled withthe Communist movement. American officials did notthink France should control Vietnam, but they did notwant Vietnam to be Communist either.

Two events convinced the Truman administrationto help France—the fall of China to communism, andthe outbreak of the Korean War. Korea, in particular,convinced American officials that the Soviet Unionhad begun a major push to impose communism onEast Asia. Shortly after the Korean War began,Truman authorized a massive program of militaryaid to French forces fighting in Vietnam.

On taking office in 1953, President Eisenhowercontinued to support the French military campaignagainst the Vietminh. By 1954 the United States waspaying roughly three-fourths of France’s war costs.During a news conference that year, Eisenhowerdefended United States policy in Vietnam by stress-ing what became known as the domino theory—thebelief that if Vietnam fell to communism, so toowould the other nations of Southeast Asia:

“You have a row of dominoes set up, you knockover the first one, and what will happen to the lastone is the certainty that it will go over veryquickly. . . . Asia, after all, has already lost 450 mil-lion of its peoples to the Communist dictatorship, andwe simply can’t afford greater losses. . . .”

—quoted in America in Vietnam

Summarizing Why did Ho ChiMinh lead a resistance movement against France?

The Vietminh Drive Out the FrenchDespite significant amounts of aid from the

United States, the French struggled against theVietminh, who consistently frustrated the Frenchwith hit-and-run and ambush tactics. These are thetactics of guerrillas, irregular troops who usuallyblend into the civilian population and are often diffi-cult for regular armies to fight. The mounting casual-ties and the inability of the French to defeat theVietminh made the war very unpopular in France.Finally, in 1954, the struggle reached a turning point.

TURNING POINT

Defeat at Dien Bien Phu In 1954 the French com-mander ordered his forces to occupy the mountaintown of Dien Bien Phu. Seizing the town wouldinterfere with the Vietminh’s supply lines and forcethem into open battle.

Soon afterward, a huge Vietminh force sur-rounded Dien Bien Phu and began bombarding thetown. “Shells rained down on us without stoppinglike a hailstorm on a fall evening,” recalled one

Reading Check

Nationalist Leader Ho Chi Minh was already involved in fighting for Vietnam’sindependence when this photograph was taken in 1946. What foreign countrywas he opposing at that time?

History

French soldier. “Bunker after bunker,trench after trench collapsed, buryingunder them men and weapons.” On May7, 1954, the French force at Dien Bien Phufell to the Vietminh. The defeat convincedthe French to make peace and withdrawfrom Indochina.

Geneva Accords Negotiations to end theconflict were held in Geneva, Switzerland.The Geneva Accords temporarily dividedVietnam along the 17th parallel, with HoChi Minh and the Vietminh in control ofNorth Vietnam and a pro-Western regimein control of the South. In 1956 electionswere to be held to reunite the countryunder a single government. The GenevaConference also recognized Cambodia’sindependence. (Laos had gained inde-pendence the previous year.)

Shortly after the Geneva Accords parti-tioned Vietnam, the French finally left.The United States almost immediatelystepped in and became the principal pro-tector of the new government in the South, led by anationalist leader named Ngo Dinh Diem (NOH DIHN

deh·EHM). Like Ho Chi Minh, Diem had been edu-cated abroad, but unlike the North Vietnameseleader, Diem was pro-Western and fiercely anti-Communist. A Catholic, he welcomed the roughlyone million North Vietnamese Catholics whomigrated south to escape Ho Chi Minh’s rule.

When the time came in 1956 to hold countrywideelections, as called for by the Geneva Accords, Diemrefused. He knew that the Communist-controlled

north would not allow genuinely free elections, andthat Ho Chi Minh would almost certainly have won asa result. Eisenhower supported Diem and increasedAmerican military and economic aid to SouthVietnam. In the wake of Diem’s actions, tensionsbetween the North and South intensified. The nationseemed headed toward civil war, with the UnitedStates caught in the middle of it.

Examining What was the effect ofthe French defeat at Dien Bien Phu?

Reading Check

Writing About History

CHAPTER 25 The Vietnam War 775

Checking for Understanding1. Define: domino theory, guerrilla.2. Identify: Ho Chi Minh, Dien Bien Phu,

Ngo Dinh Diem.3. Explain the goals of the Vietminh.

Reviewing Themes4. Government and Democracy Why did

Ngo Dinh Diem refuse to hold country-wide elections in Vietnam in 1956?

Critical Thinking5. Interpreting Why do you think the

United States supported the govern-ment of Ngo Dinh Diem?

6. Organizing Use a graphic organizerlike the one below to list provisions ofthe Geneva Accords.

Analyzing Visuals7. Analyzing Photographs Study the

Vietnam scene on page 773. Howwould you describe the contrastbetween American and Vietnamesesocieties? How do you think this con-trast influenced American thinkingtoward the war?

8. Descriptive Writing Take on the roleof a Vietnamese peasant in the 1940s.Write a journal entry on your feelingstoward the French.

Last Stand French troops assemble a tank near the Dien Bien Phu airfield shortly before theirdefeat by the Vietminh. How did this defeat influence French policy in Indochina?

History

Geneva Accords Provisions

Study CentralTM To review this section, go toand click on Study CentralTM.tarvol2.glencoe.com

1963Number of American military advisers inSouth Vietnam reaches around 15,000


!1966

Marlene Kramel joined the Army Nurse Corps in 1965 when she was 21, and she went toVietnam the following year. She was working in a makeshift hospital on what was a particu-larly quiet night. Most of the patients who filled the beds that evening were suffering frommalaria.

Suddenly, a row of helicopters roared in from over the horizon, carrying wounded from anearby battle. As the casualties came in on stretchers, the hospital turned chaotic. Doctors ranabout the facility screaming orders and frantically trying to treat patients.

The only nurse on duty at the time, Kramel felt overwhelmed by the confusion. “Every oneof the doctors is yelling for me,” she recalled. “I didn’t know what to do next. ‘Start this. Dothat.’ Everybody’s yelling at me. I couldn’t do enough.” Things happened so quickly that night,she insisted, that she could not remember most of it. “I can’t remember blood, even. I canonly remember, ‘What am I going to do?’ And the doctors moving at tremendous speed. AndI’m there. And I’m not able to move fast enough. . . . That’s all I remember.”

—adapted from The Living and the Dead

American Involvement DeepensThe steps that led to the chaos and casualties Marlene Kramel experienced in 1966

began in the mid-1950s when American officials decided to support the government ofSouth Vietnam in its struggle against North Vietnam. After Ngo Dinh Diem refused to

Going to Warin Vietnam

Marlene Kramel

1964Congress passes Gulf ofTonkin Resolution

1965The United States begins bombing North Vietnam;first American combat troops arrive in Vietnam

!1963 !1964 !1965

Main IdeaAfter providing South Vietnam with muchaid and support, the United States finallysent in troops to fight as well.

Key Terms and NamesVietcong, Gulf of Tonkin Resolution,napalm, Agent Orange, Ho Chi Minh trail

Reading StrategyTaking Notes As you read about thebeginnings of the Vietnam War, use themajor headings of the section to createan outline similar to the one below.

Reading Objectives • Describe how President Johnson deep-

ened American involvement in Vietnam.• Discuss how the Vietcong and the

North Vietnamese were able to frustratethe American military.

Section ThemeScience and Technology American military procedures differed significantlyfrom those of the Vietcong troops.

Going to War in VietnamI. American Involvement Deepens

A.B.

II.A.B.

hold national elections, Ho ChiMinh and his followers began anarmed struggle to reunify thenation. They organized a newguerrilla army, which becameknown as the Vietcong. As fight-ing began between the Vietcongand South Vietnam’s forces,President Eisenhower increasedAmerican aid, and sent hun-dreds of military advisers totrain South Vietnam’s army.

Despite the American assis-tance, the Vietcong continued togrow more powerful, in partbecause many Vietnameseopposed Diem’s government,and in part because of theVietcong’s use of terror. By 1961the Vietcong had assassinatedthousands of government offi-cials and established controlover much of the countryside. In response Diemlooked increasingly to the United States to keepSouth Vietnam from collapsing.

Kennedy Takes Over On taking office in 1961,President Kennedy continued the nation’s policy ofsupport for South Vietnam. Like presidents Trumanand Eisenhower before him, Kennedy saw theSoutheast Asian country as vitally important in thebattle against communism.

In political terms, Kennedy needed to appeartough on communism, since Republicans oftenaccused Democrats of having lost China to commu-nism during the Truman administration. Kennedy’sadministration sharply increased military aid andsent more advisers to Vietnam. From 1961 to late1963, the number of American military personnel inSouth Vietnam jumped from about 2,000 to around15,000.

American officials believed the Vietcong contin-ued to grow because Diem’s government was unpop-ular and corrupt. They urged him to create a moredemocratic government and to introduce reforms tohelp Vietnam’s peasants. Diem introduced some lim-ited reforms, but they had little effect.

One program Diem introduced, at the urging ofAmerican advisers, made the situation worse. TheSouth Vietnamese created special fortified villages,known as strategic hamlets. These villages were pro-tected by machine guns, bunkers, trenches, and barbedwire. Vietnamese officials then moved villagers to the

strategic hamlets, partly to protect them from theVietcong, and partly to prevent them from giving aidto the Vietcong. The program proved to be extremelyunpopular. Many peasants resented being uprootedfrom their villages, where they had worked to buildfarms and where many of their ancestors lay buried.

The Overthrow of Diem Diem made himself evenmore unpopular by discriminating against Buddhism,one of the country’s most widely practiced religions.In the spring of 1963, Diem, a Catholic, banned the tra-ditional religious flags for Buddha’s birthday. WhenBuddhists took to the streets in protest, Diem’s policekilled 9 people and injured 14 others. In the demon-strations that followed, a Buddhist monk set himselfon fire, the first of several to do so. The photograph ofhis self-destruction appeared on television and on thefront pages of newspapers around the world. It was astark symbol of the opposition to Diem.

In August 1963, American ambassador HenryCabot Lodge arrived in Vietnam. He quickly learnedthat Diem’s unpopularity had so alarmed severalVietnamese generals that they were plotting to over-throw him. When Lodge expressed American sympa-thy for their cause, the generals launched a militarycoup. They seized power on November 1, 1963, andexecuted Diem shortly afterward.

Diem’s overthrow only made matters worse.Despite his unpopularity with some Vietnamese,Diem had been a respected nationalist and a capableadministrator. After his death, South Vietnam’s


Self-Immolation On June 11, 1963, flames erupted around a Buddhist monk as he set himself on fire toprotest government religious policies. What policies did Ngo Dinh Diem take toward Buddhism?

History

government grew increasingly weak and unstable.The United States became even more deeplyinvolved in order to prop up the weak SouthVietnamese government. Coincidentally, threeweeks after Diem’s death, President Kennedy wasalso assassinated. The presidency, as well as thegrowing problem of Vietnam, now belonged toKennedy’s vice president, Lyndon Johnson.

Examining What was the main goalof the Vietcong?

Johnson and VietnamInitially President Johnson exercised caution and

restraint regarding the conflict in Vietnam. “We seekno wider war,” he repeatedly promised. At the sametime, Johnson was determined to prevent SouthVietnam from becoming Communist. “The battleagainst communism,” he declared shortly beforebecoming president, “must be joined . . . withstrength and determination.”

Politics also played a role in Johnson’s Vietnampolicy. Like Kennedy, Johnson remembered thatmany Republicans blamed the Truman administra-tion for the fall of China to communism in 1949.Should the Democrats also “lose” Vietnam, Johnsonfeared, it might cause a “mean and destructivedebate that would shatter my Presidency, kill myadministration, and damage our democracy.”

TURNING POINT

The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution On August 2,1964, President Johnson announced that NorthVietnamese torpedo boats had fired on twoAmerican destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin. Two dayslater, the president reported that another similarattack had taken place. Johnson was campaigningfor the presidency and was very sensitive to accusa-tions of being soft on communism. He insisted thatNorth Vietnam’s attacks were unprovoked andimmediately ordered American aircraft to attackNorth Vietnamese ships and naval facilities. Johnson

Reading Check

The Vietnam WarAs the war in Vietnam dragged on, a clear division of

American opinion emerged. In January 1966, George W.Ball, undersecretary of state to President Johnson, deliveredan address to indicate “how we got [to Vietnam] and why wemust stay.” George F. Kennan, former ambassador to Russia,testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee thatsame year, arguing that American involvement in Vietnamwas “something we would not choose deliberately if thechoice were ours to make all over again today.”

George W. Ball:

“[T]he conflict in Vietnam is a product of the great shifts andchanges triggered by the Second World War. Out of the war,two continent-wide powers emerged—the United States andthe Soviet Union. The colonial systems through which thenations of Western Europe had governed more than a third ofthe people of the world were, one by one, dismantled.

. . . [E]ven while the new national boundaries were stillbeing marked on the map, the Soviet Union under Stalinexploited the confusion to push out the perimeter of its powerand influence in an effort to extend the outer limits ofCommunist domination by force or the threat of force.

The bloody encounters in [Vietnam] are thus in a real sensebattles and skirmishes in a continuing war to prevent oneCommunist power after another from violating internationallyrecognized boundary lines fixing the outer limits of Communistdominion.

. . . The evidence shows clearly enough that, at the time ofFrench withdrawal . . . the Communist regime in Hanoi neverintended that South Vietnam should develop in freedom.

. . . In the long run our hopes for the people of SouthVietnam reflect our hopes for people everywhere. What weseek is a world living in peace and freedom.”

did not reveal that the American warships had beenhelping the South Vietnamese conduct electronicspying and commando raids against North Vietnam.

Johnson then asked Congress to authorize the useof force to defend American forces. Congress agreedto Johnson’s request with little debate. Most mem-bers of Congress agreed with Republican Repre-sentative Ross Adair of Indiana, who defiantlydeclared, “The American flag has been fired upon.We will not and cannot tolerate such things.”

On August 7, 1964, the Senate and House passedthe Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, authorizing the pres-ident to “take all necessary measures to repel anyarmed attack against the forces of the United Statesand to prevent further aggression.” With only twodissenting votes, Congress had, in effect, handed itswar powers over to the president. ; (See page 961 formore on the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.)

The United States Sends in Troops Shortly afterCongress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, theVietcong began to attack bases where American

advisers were stationed in South Vietnam. Theattacks began in the fall of 1964 and continued toescalate. After a Vietcong attack on a base at Pleiku inFebruary 1965 left 7 Americans dead and more than100 wounded, President Johnson decided to respond.Less than 14 hours after the attack, American aircraftassaulted North Vietnam.

After the airstrikes, one poll showed thatJohnson’s approval rating on his handling ofVietnam jumped from 41 percent to 60 percent. Thepresident’s actions also met with strong approvalfrom his closest advisers, including Secretary ofDefense Robert McNamara and National SecurityAdviser McGeorge Bundy.

There were some dissenters in the White House,chief among them Undersecretary of State GeorgeBall, a long-time critic of U.S. policy in Vietnam. Hewarned that if the United States got too deeplyinvolved in Vietnam, it might become difficult to getout. “Once on the tiger’s back,” he warned, “we can-not be sure of picking the place to dismount.”

Most of the advisers who surrounded Johnson,however, firmly believed the nation had a duty tohalt communism in Vietnam, both to maintain stabil-ity in Southeast Asia and to ensure the UnitedStates’s continuing power and prestige in the world.In a memo to the president, Bundy argued:

“The stakes in Vietnam are extremely high. TheAmerican investment is very large, and Americanresponsibility is a fact of life which is palpable in theatmosphere of Asia, and even elsewhere. The interna-tional prestige of the U.S. and a substantial part ofour influence are directly at risk in Vietnam.”

—quoted in The Best and the Brightest

In March 1965, Johnson expanded Americaninvolvement by shifting his policy to a sustainedbombing campaign against North Vietnam. The cam-paign was named Operation Rolling Thunder. Thatmonth the president also ordered the first combattroops into Vietnam. American soldiers were nowfighting alongside the South Vietnamese troopsagainst the Vietcong.

Describing How did politics play arole in President Johnson’s Vietnam policy?

A Bloody Stalemate EmergesBy the end of 1965, more than 180,000 American

combat troops were fighting in Vietnam. In 1966 thatnumber doubled. Since the American military was

Reading Check


George F. Kennan:

“Vietnam is not a region of major military and industrialimportance. It is difficult to believe that any decisive devel-opments of the world situation would be determined in nor-mal circumstances by what happens on that territory. . . .Even a situation in which South Vietnam was controlledexclusively by the Vietcong, while regrettable . . . would not,in my opinion, present dangers great enough to justify ourdirect military intervention.

. . . To attempt to crush North Vietnamese strength to apoint where [it] could no longer give any support forVietcong political activity in the South, would . . . have theeffect of bringing in Chinese forces at some point.

. . . Our motives are widely misinterpreted, and the spec-tacle emphasized and reproduced in thousands of pressphotographs and stories . . . produces reactions among mil-lions of people throughout the world profoundly detrimen-tal to the image we would like them to hold of this country.”

Learning From History1. Recognizing Ideologies How do

the two speakers assess the value ofVietnam and its people to the UnitedStates?

2. Making Inferences Why doesGeorge Kennan believe that theUnited States government gotinvolved in Vietnam when it did?How does he feel about this involvement?

extremely strong, it marched into Vietnam with greatconfidence. “America seemed omnipotent then,” saidPhilip Caputo, one of the first marines to arrive. “Wesaw ourselves as the champions of a ‘cause that wasdestined to triumph.’”

Frustrating Warfare Lacking the firepower of theAmericans, the Vietcong used ambushes, boobytraps, and guerrilla tactics. Ronald J. Glasser, anAmerican army doctor, described the devastatingeffects of one booby trap:

“Three quarters of the way through the tangle, atrooper brushed against a two-inch vine, and agrenade slung at chest high went off, shattering theright side of his head and body. . . . Nearby trooperstook hold of the unconscious soldier and, half carry-ing, half dragging him, pulled him the rest of the waythrough the jungle.”

—quoted in Vietnam, A History

The Vietcong also frustrated American troops byblending in with the general population in the citiesand the countryside and then quickly vanishing. “It

was a sheer physical impossibility to keep the enemyfrom slipping away whenever he wished,” oneAmerican general said. Journalist Linda Martinnoted, “It’s a war where nothing is ever quite certainand nowhere is ever quite safe.”

To counter the Vietcong’s tactics, American troopswent on “search and destroy” missions. They tried tofind enemy troops, bomb their positions, destroytheir supply lines, and force them out into the openfor combat.

American forces also sought to take away theVietcong’s ability to hide in the thick jungles by liter-ally destroying the landscape. American planesdropped napalm, a jellied gasoline that explodes oncontact. They also used Agent Orange, a chemicalthat strips leaves from trees and shrubs, turningfarmland and forest into wasteland.

A Determined Enemy United States military lead-ers underestimated the Vietcong’s strength. They alsomisjudged the enemy’s stamina. American generalsbelieved that continuously bombing and killing largenumbers of Vietcong would destroy the enemy’smorale and force them to give up. The guerrillas,


AMERICA’S LONGESTWAR Clinging to his M-16 rifle, awounded American Marine isshown after being pulled tosafety by a fellow soldier. In thelate 1950s, American militaryadvisers were sent to help theSouth Vietnamese army fightguerrillas known as theVietcong, who were receivingweapons, supplies, and trainingfrom Communist NorthVietnam.The dense jungles ofVietnam made fighting theguerrillas very difficult. By 1968about 500,000 U.S. troops werefighting in the increasinglyunpopular war. Americanforces finally withdrew inMarch 1973.

MOMENTinHISTORY

however, had no intention of surrendering, and theywere willing to accept huge losses in human lives.

In the Vietcong’s war effort, North Vietnamese sup-port was a major factor. Although the Vietcong forceswere made up of many South Vietnamese, NorthVietnam provided arms, advisers, and significant lead-ership. Later in the war, as Vietcong casualtiesmounted, North Vietnam began sending regular NorthVietnamese Army units to fight in South Vietnam.

North Vietnam sent arms and supplies south byway of a network of jungle paths known as the Ho Chi Minh trail. The trail wound through thecountries of Cambodia and Laos, bypassing the bor-der between North and South Vietnam. Because thetrail passed through countries not directly involvedin the war, President Johnson refused to allow a full-scale attack on the trail to shut it down.

North Vietnam itself received military weaponsand other support from the Soviet Union andChina. One of the main reasons President Johnsonrefused to order a full-scale invasion of NorthVietnam was his fear that such an attack wouldbring China into the war, as had happened inKorea. By placing limits on the war, however,Johnson made it very difficult to win. Instead ofconquering enemy territory, American troops wereforced to fight a war of attrition—a strategy ofdefeating the enemy forces by slowly wearing themdown. This strategy led troops to conduct grislybody counts after battles to determine how manyenemy soldiers had been killed.

Bombing from American planes killed as many as 220,000 Vietnamese between 1965 and 1967.Nevertheless, the Vietcong and North Vietnamese troopsshowed no sign of surrendering. Meanwhile, American

casualties continued to mount. By the end of 1966, morethan 6,700 American soldiers had been killed.

As the number of Americans killed and woundedcontinued to grow, the notion of a quick and decisivevictory grew increasingly remote. As a result, manycitizens back home began to question the nation’sinvolvement in the war.

Describing What tactics did theUnited States adopt to fight the Vietcong?

Reading Check



Checking for Understanding1. Define: Vietcong, napalm.2. Identify: Gulf of Tonkin Resolution,

Agent Orange, Ho Chi Minh trail.3. Explain how the Gulf of Tonkin

Resolution affected the powers ofCongress and the presidency.

Reviewing Themes4. Science and Technology Why did the

United States use napalm and AgentOrange in its fight against the Vietcong?

Critical Thinking5. Analyzing Why did fighting in Vietnam

turn into a stalemate by the mid-1960s?6. Sequencing Complete a time line simi-

lar to the one below to fill in eventsleading to American involvement inVietnam.

Analyzing Visuals7. Analyzing Photographs Look closely

at the photograph on page 777 ofBuddhist monk Reverend Quang Duc.What in the photograph suggests thatthis event was planned by Buddhists toprotest their treatment in SouthVietnam?

8. Persuasive Writing Imagine that youare a member of Congress in August1964. Write a statement supporting oropposing the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.

August 2, 1964August 1963 November 1,1963

March 1965August 7, 1964February

1965

Vietnam War Deaths, 1965–1972

Source: Statistical Abstract of the United States.

Num

ber o

f Dea

ths (

in th

ousa

nds)

2

0

4

19661965 19681967 19701969 19721971

6

8

10

12

14

16

Year

TotalKilled inactionDied ofwoundsMissing, presumed dead

1. Interpreting Graphs How many American sol-diers were killed in action in 1968?

2. Generalizing By 1970, how much had the totalnumber killed dropped from the peak number ofdeaths in 1968?


MotionIn

The sources advising PresidentJohnson on the Gulf of Tonkin inci-dent included the navy and theDefense Department. These excerptssuggest how difficult it was to knowwhat had happened—and also howtension influenced the Americaninterpretation.

U.S. Navy Commander John Herrickof the USS Maddox:I am being approached by high-speed craft with apparent inten-tion of torpedo attack. I intend toopen fire in self-defense if necessary.—from a cable of August 2, 1964

U.S. Defense Department: While on routine patrol in interna-tional waters . . . the U.S. destroyerMaddox underwent an unpro-voked attack by three PT-typeboats in . . . the Tonkin Gulf.

The attacking boats launched threetorpedoes and used 37-millimetergunfire. The Maddox answered

with 5-inch gunfire. . . . The PTboats were driven off, with oneseen to be badly damaged and notmoving. . . .

No casualties or damage weresustained by the Maddox or theaircraft.

—from a press release of August 2, 1964

National Security Council Meeting:Secretary McNamara: The NorthVietnamese PT boats have contin-ued their attacks on the two U.S.destroyers in international watersin the Gulf of Tonkin. . . .

Secretary Rusk: An immediate anddirect action by us is necessary.The unprovoked attack on thehigh seas is an act of war for allpractical purposes. . . .

CIA Director McCone: The pro-posed U.S. reprisals will result insharp North Vietnamese militaryaction, but such actions wouldnot represent a deliberate

decision to provoke or accept amajor escalation of theVietnamese war.

President Johnson: Do they want awar by attacking our ships in themiddle of the Gulf of Tonkin?

U.S. Intelligence Agency DirectorRowan: Do we know for a factthat the North Vietnamese provo-cation took place?

Secretary McNamara: We willknow definitely in the morning.

—August 2, 1964

Secretary Rusk:We believe that present OPLAN34-A activities are beginning to rattle Hanoi [capital of NorthVietnam], and the Maddox incidentis directly related to their effort toresist these activities. We have nointention of yielding to pressure.

—from a top secret telegram to Ambassador MaxwellTaylor (South Vietnam),

August 3, 1964


Incident in the Gulf of TonkinIn 1964 the Vietcong in South Vietnam were trying to topple the gov-

ernment and unite the country under communism. To prevent this,the United States had already committed money, supplies, and advis-

ers. President Johnson asked Congress to authorize using force afterreports that North Vietnam had made unprovoked attacks on U.S. war-ships in the Gulf of Tonkin. Congress responded with the Gulf of TonkinResolution. Had the warship USS Maddox provoked the attack? WasJohnson fully informed of events in the Gulf? You’re the historian.

Read the following excerpts, then answer the questions and complete the activities that follow.

President Lyndon Johnson


Two days after the alleged attack, theTurner Joy joined the Maddox inthe Gulf. On the night of August 4,1964, the two destroyers experienceda series of events they interpreted as asecond attack. However, CommanderHerrick later revised this report.President Johnson referred to the“repeated” attacks later when heasked Congress for war powers.

Commander Herrick:Review of action makes manycontacts and torpedoes firedappear doubtful. Freak weathereffects on radar and overeagersonarmen may have accountedfor many reports. No actualvisual sightings by Maddox.Suggest complete evaluationbefore any further action. . . .

Turner Joy also reports no actualvisual sightings or wake. . . .Entire action leaves many doubts

except for apparent attempt toambush at beginning.

—from two cables of August 4, 1964

President Johnson:The initial attack on the destroyerMaddox, on August 2, wasrepeated today by a number ofhostile vessels attacking two U.S.destroyers with torpedoes. Thedestroyers and supporting air-craft acted at once on the orders Igave after the initial act of aggres-sion. . . . Repeated acts of violenceagainst the Armed Forces of theUnited States must be met notonly with alert defense, but withpositive reply.

—in a television and radioaddress, August 4, 1964

In 1968 Senator William Fulbrightopened an investigation into the1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident. Thefollowing exchange took placebetween Senator Fulbright andSecretary McNamara.

Secretary McNamara: I don’t believeCommander Herrick in his cablestated that he had doubt that theattack took place. He questionedcertain details of the attack. . . .Secondly, his doubts were resolvedthat afternoon before the retalia-tory action was taken.

Senator Fulbright: I think he wentfurther than that. He advised younot to do anything until it hadbeen reevaluated. . . . It is a verystrong statement.

Secretary McNamara: Nothing wasdone until it was reevaluated.

Senator Fulbright: He says“Suggest complete reevaluationbefore any further action.” Nowthat is a very strong recommen-dation from a man on the scenein charge of the operation. . . .Both committees, except for theSenator from Oregon [Morse],unanimously accepted your testi-mony then as the whole story,and I must say this raises veryserious questions about how youmake decisions to go to war.

Vietcong guerrillas

Secretary McNamara

Understanding the Issue1. What statement by Rusk suggests the

United States may have provoked theattack on the Maddox?

2. Do you think President Johnson wasmisled by his advisers? Explain.

3. How soon after the alleged attacksdid the president address theAmerican people? Did the UnitedStates rush to judgment in this case?Explain.

Activities1. Investigate What were the conclu-

sions of the Fulbright investigationsinto the Gulf of Tonkin incident?Check sources, including the Internet.

2. Discuss Research and reviewAmerican decisions to go to war in1898, 1917, and 1941. What were the concerns? Do you think thenation made the right decisions?

Martin Jezer, a 27-year-old copywriter living in New York City, had never considered him-self a radical. “I campaigned for Lyndon Johnson in 1964,” he recalled. As his opposition tothe war in Vietnam grew, however, Jezer decided to stage a public protest.

On April 15, 1967, he and dozens of other young men gathered with their military draftcards in New York’s Central Park. Before an audience of reporters, photographers, FBI offi-cials, and citizens, the men pulled out matches and lighters and burned the cards.

“We began singing freedom songs and chanting, ‘Resist! Resist!’ and ‘Burn Draft Cards,Not People’. . . . People in the audience were applauding us, shouting encouragement. Thensome guys began to come out of the audience with draft cards in hand. They burned them.Alone, in pairs, by threes they came. Each flaming draft card brought renewed cheering andmore people out of the crowd. . . . Some of the draft card burners were girls, wives, or girl-friends of male card burners. . . . It lasted this way for about half an hour.”

—quoted in The Vietnam War: Opposing Viewpoints

1965Teach-ins on collegecampuses begin


A Growing Credibility GapJezer’s protest was just one of many, as American opposition to the Vietnam War

grew in the late 1960s. When American troops first entered the Vietnam War in thespring of 1965, many Americans had supported the military effort. A Gallup poll

Vietnam Divides the Nation

Antiwar activists burn draftcards at the Pentagon in 1972

1966Senate Foreign Relations Committeebegins Vietnam hearings

1967March on thePentagon

January 1968Tet offensive

!1965 !1966 !1967 !1968

Main IdeaThe experience of Vietnam producedsharp divisions between Americans whosupported the war and those who did not.

Key Terms and NamesWilliam Westmoreland, credibility gap,teach-in, dove, hawk, Tet offensive

Reading StrategyOrganizing As you read aboutAmericans’ reactions to the Vietnam War,complete a graphic organizer like the onebelow to list the reasons for opposition tothe war.

Reading Objective • Analyze why support for the war began

to weaken.• Describe the motives of those in the

antiwar movement.

Section ThemeCivic Rights and Responsibilities ManyAmericans protested their country’sinvolvement in the Vietnam War.

Reasons for Opposition to Vietnam War

published around that time showed that 66 percentof Americans approved of the policy in Vietnam. Asthe war dragged on, however, public support beganto drop. Suspicion of the government’s truthfulnessabout the war was a significant reason. Throughoutthe early years of the war, the American commanderin South Vietnam, General William Westmoreland,reported that the enemy was on the brink of defeat.In 1967 he confidently declared that the “enemy’shopes are bankrupt” and added, “we have reachedan important point where the end begins to comeinto view.”

Contradicting such reports were less optimisticmedia accounts, especially on television. Vietnamwas the first “television war,” with footage of combatappearing nightly on the evening news. Day afterday, millions of people saw images of wounded anddead Americans and began to doubt governmentreports. In the view of many, a credibility gap haddeveloped, meaning it was hard to believe what theJohnson administration said about the war.

Congress, which had given the president a nearlyfree hand in Vietnam, soon grew uncertain about thewar. Beginning in February 1966, the Senate ForeignRelations Committee held “educational” hearings onVietnam, calling in Secretary of State Dean Rusk andother policy makers to explain the administration’swar program. The committee also listened to criticssuch as American diplomat George Kennan.Although Kennan had helped create the policy ofcontainment, he argued that Vietnam was not strate-gically important to the United States.

Explaining Why was the VietnamWar the first “television war”?

An Antiwar Movement EmergesAs casualties mounted in Vietnam, many people

began to protest publicly against the war and todemand that the United States pull out. Althoughmany other Americans supported the war, oppo-nents of the conflict received the most attention.

Teach-Ins Begin In March 1965, a group of facultymembers and students at the University of Michiganabandoned their classes and joined together in ateach-in. Here, they informally discussed the issuessurrounding the war and reaffirmed their reasons foropposing it. The gathering inspired teach-ins at manycampuses. In May 1965, 122 colleges held a “NationalTeach-In” by radio for more than 100,000 antiwardemonstrators.

People who opposed the war did so for differentreasons. Some saw the conflict as a civil war in whichthe United States had no business. Others viewedSouth Vietnam as a corrupt dictatorship and insistedthat defending that country was immoral and unjust.

Anger at the Draft Young protesters especiallyfocused on what they saw as an unfair draft system.At the beginning of the war, a college student wasoften able to defer military service until after gradua-tion. By contrast, young people from low-incomefamilies were more likely to be sent to Vietnambecause they were unable to afford college. Thismeant minorities, particularly African Americans,made up a disproportionately large number of thesoldiers in Vietnam. By 1967, for example, AfricanAmericans accounted for about 20 percent ofAmerican combat deaths—about twice their propor-tion of the population within the United States. Thatnumber would decline to roughly match their popu-lation proportion by the war’s end.

Reading Check

Dark Passage One particular phrase came to represent the govern-ment’s claims that it was on the verge of ending the Vietnam War: “thelight at the end of the tunnel.” Why did many people become skepticalabout such government claims?

Analyzing Political Cartoons


Flower Power Student antiwar protests ranged from violent confrontation to thispeaceful but dramatic demonstration near the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. Whatwere some reasons many people opposed the war?

History


The high number of African Americans and poorAmericans dying in Vietnam angered AfricanAmerican leaders, including Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.Early on, King had refrained from speaking out againstthe war for fear that it would draw attention from thecivil rights movement. In April 1967, however, hebroke his silence and publicly condemned the conflict:

“Somehow this madness must cease. I speak as achild of God and brother to the suffering poor ofVietnam and the poor of America who are paying thedouble price of smashed hopes at home and deathand corruption in Vietnam. I speak as a citizen of theworld, for the world as it stands aghast at the path wehave taken. I speak as an American to the leader ofmy own nation. The great initiative in this war is ours.The initiative to stop must be ours.”

—quoted in A Testament of Hope

As the war escalated, American officials increasedthe draft call, putting many college students at risk.An estimated 500,000 draftees refused to go. Manypublicly burned their draft cards or simply did not

report when called for induction. Some fled the coun-try, moving to Canada, Sweden, or other nations.Others stayed and went to prison rather than fight ina war they opposed.

Between 1965 and 1968, officials prosecuted morethan 3,300 Americans for refusing to serve. The draftbecame less of an issue in 1969 when the governmentintroduced a lottery system, in which only those withlow lottery numbers were subject to the draft.

Protests against the war were not confined to col-lege campuses. Demonstrators held public rallies andmarches in towns across the country. In April 1965,Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), a left-wingstudent organization, organized a march onWashington, D.C., that drew more than 20,000 partic-ipants. Two years later, in October 1967, a rally atWashington’s Lincoln Memorial drew tens of thou-sands of protesters as well.

Anger over the draft also fueled discussions of vot-ing age. Many draftees argued that if they were oldenough to fight, they were old enough to vote. In 1971the Twenty-sixth Amendment to the Constitution wasratified, giving all citizens age 18 and older the rightto vote in all state and federal elections.

Hawks and Doves In the face of growing opposi-tion to the war, President Johnson remained deter-mined to continue fighting. The president was notalone in his views. Although the antiwar protestersbecame a vocal group, they did not represent major-ity opinion on Vietnam. In a poll taken in mid-1967,about 68 percent of the respondents favored continu-ing the war, compared to about 32 percent whowanted to end it. Of those Americans who supportedthe policy in Vietnam, many openly criticized theprotesters for a lack of patriotism.

By 1968 the nation seemed to be divided into twocamps. Those who wanted the United States to with-draw from Vietnam were known as doves. Thosewho insisted that the United States stay and fightcame to be known as hawks. As the two groupsdebated, the war took a dramatic turn for the worse,and the nation endured a year of shock and crisis.

Explaining What led to the passageof the Twenty-sixth Amendment?

1968: The Pivotal Year The most turbulent year of the chaotic 1960s was

1968. The year saw a shocking political announce-ment, a pair of traumatic assassinations, and a vio-lent political convention. First, however, the nationendured a surprise attack in Vietnam.

TURNING POINT

The Tet Offensive On January 30, 1968, during Tet,the Vietnamese New Year, the Vietcong and NorthVietnamese launched a massive surprise attack. In thisTet offensive, the guerrilla fighters attacked virtuallyall American airbases in South Vietnam and most ofthe South’s major cities and provincial capitals. The bloodiest battle took place at Hué, SouthVietnam’s third largest city. The Communist forcesseized much of the city, and it took American andSouth Vietnamese troops almost four weeks to drive them out. Afterward, American troops foundmass graves. The Communist forces had massacredthe city’s political and religious leaders as well as many foreigners, intellectuals, and others associ-ated with South Vietnam’s government. Nearly 3,000bodies were found. Thousands more remained missing.

Militarily, Tet turned out to be a disaster for theCommunist forces. After about a month of fighting,the American and South Vietnamese soldiersrepelled the enemy troops, inflicting heavy losses on

them. General Westmoreland boasted that theCommunists’ “well-laid plans went afoul,” whilePresident Johnson triumphantly added that theenemy’s effort had ended in “complete failure.”

In fact, the North Vietnamese had scored a majorpolitical victory. The American people were shockedthat an enemy supposedly on the verge of defeat couldlaunch such a large-scale attack. When GeneralWestmoreland requested 206,000 troops in addition tothe 500,000 already in Vietnam, it seemed to be anadmission that the United States could not win the war.

To make matters worse, the mainstream media,which had tried to remain balanced in their war cover-age, now openly criticized the effort. Walter Cronkite,then the nation’s most respected television newscaster,announced after Tet that it seemed “more certain thanever that the bloody experience in Vietnam is to end ina stalemate.”

Public opinion no longer favored the president. Inthe weeks following the Tet offensive, the president’sapproval rating plummeted to a dismal 35 percent,while support for his handling of the war fell evenlower, to 26 percent.

Johnson Leaves the Presidential Race With thewar growing increasingly unpopular and Johnson’scredibility all but gone, some Democrats began look-ing for an alternative candidate to nominate for presi-dent in 1968. In November 1967, even before the Tetdisaster, a little-known liberal senator from Minnesota,Eugene McCarthy, became the first dove to announcehis candidacy against Johnson. In March 1968,McCarthy stunned the nation by winning more than40 percent of the votes in the New Hampshire primary

Reading Check

The Peace Symbol This familiar symbol of the1960s was originally designed to stand for the fightfor nuclear disarmament. Created by British artistGerald Holtom in 1958, the symbol was first used ata British demonstration against a research center forthe development of nuclear weapons. It combinedthe semaphore for the letters “N” and “D,” standingfor nuclear disarmament. Semaphore isa system of visual signaling usingtwo flags, one held in each hand.N is two flags held in an upside-down V, and D is one flagpointed straight up and theother pointed straight down.

and almost defeating the president. Realizing thatJohnson was vulnerable, Senator Robert Kennedy,who also opposed the war, quickly entered the race forthe Democratic nomination.

With the division in the country and within his ownparty growing, Johnson addressed the public on televi-sion on March 31, 1968. He stunned viewers by stating,“I have concluded that I should not permit the presi-dency to become involved in the partisan divisions thatare developing in this political year. Accordingly, I shallnot seek, and I will not accept, the nomination of myparty for another term as your President.”

A Season of Violence Following Johnson’s an-nouncement, the nation endured even more shockingevents. In April James Earl Ray was arrested forkilling Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., an event which ledto riots in several major cities. Just two months later,another assassination rocked the country—that ofRobert Kennedy. Kennedy, who appeared to be onhis way to winning the Democratic nomination, was

gunned down on June 5 in a California hotel just afterwinning the state’s Democratic primary. The assassinwas Sirhan Sirhan, an Arab nationalist apparentlyangry over the candidate’s pro-Israeli remarks a fewnights before.

The violence that seemed to plague the country atevery turn in 1968 culminated with a chaotic andwell-publicized clash between protesters and policeat the Democratic National Convention in Chicago.Thousands of protesters descended on the Augustconvention, demanding that the Democrats adopt anantiwar platform.

On the third day of the convention, the delegateschose Hubert Humphrey, President Johnson’s vicepresident, as their presidential nominee. Meanwhile,in a park not far from the convention hall, the pro-testers and police began fighting. A full-scale riotsoon engulfed the streets of downtown Chicago. Asofficers tried to disperse demonstrators with tear gasand billy clubs, demonstrators taunted the authori-ties with the chant, “The whole world is watching!”


DemilitarizedZone

200 kilometers0Miller Cylindrical projection

200 miles0

N

S

EW20°N

10°N

110°E

American Embassyattacked,

January 31, 1968

Mekong R

.

SouthChina Sea

Gulf of Thailand

Gulf of Tonkin

MekongDelta

THAILAND

LAOS

CHINA

NORTHVIETNAM

SOUTHVIETNAM

CAMBODIA

HueKhe Sanh Da Nang

Hanoi

Hoi AnChu LaiQuang Ngai

Qui NhonKontum

Tuy HoaTuy An

Nha TrangDa Lat

Phan Thiet

BienHoa

Ben Tre

Vinh Long

Can ThoMy Tho

Saigon

XuanLoc

Ban MeThuot

Tan An

The Tet Offensive, 1968

Places attacked duringTet OffensiveHo Chi Minh Trail

A view of the U.S. embassy in Saigon after it was bombed during the Tet offensive.

1. Interpreting Maps Most of the Ho Chi Minh Trail lieswithin which countries?

2. Applying Geography Skills How broad was the Tetoffensive, and why did this shock Americans?

MotionIn

Nixon Wins the Presidency The violence andchaos now associated with the Democratic Party ben-efited the 1968 Republican presidential candidate,Richard Nixon. Although defeated in the 1960 elec-tion, Nixon had remained active in national politics.A third candidate, Governor George Wallace ofAlabama, also decided to run in 1968 as an indepen-dent. Wallace, an outspoken segregationist, sought toattract those Americans who felt threatened by thecivil rights movement and urban social unrest.

Public opinion polls gave Nixon a wide lead overHumphrey and Wallace. Nixon’s campaign promiseto unify the nation and restore law and orderappealed to Americans who feared their country wasspinning out of control. Nixon also declared that hehad a plan for ending the war in Vietnam, althoughhe did not specify how the plan would work.

At first Humphrey’s support of PresidentJohnson’s Vietnam policies hurt his campaign. AfterHumphrey broke with the president and called for acomplete end to the bombing of North Vietnam, hebegan to move up in the polls. A week before theelection, President Johnson helped Humphrey byannouncing that the bombing of North Vietnam hadhalted and that a cease-fire would follow.

Johnson’s announcement had come too late. In theend, Nixon’s promises to end the war and restoreorder at home were enough to sway the Americanpeople. On Election Day, Nixon defeated Humphreyby more than 100 electoral votes, although he wonthe popular vote by a slim margin of just over 43 per-cent to Humphrey’s 42.7. Wallace helped account forthe razor-thin margin by winning 46 electoral votesand more than 13 percent of the popular vote.

Speaking to reporters after his election, Nixonrecalled seeing a young girl carrying a sign at one ofhis rallies that said: “Bring Us Together.” This, hepromised, would be his chief goal as president.Nixon also vowed to implement his plan to end theVietnam War.

Explaining Why did PresidentJohnson not run for re-election in 1968?

Reading Check



Checking for Understanding1. Define: credibility gap, teach-in, dove,

hawk.2. Identify: William Westmoreland, Tet

offensive.3. Summarize three important events that

occurred in 1968.

Reviewing Themes4. Civic Rights and Responsibilities

Why did many people believe that theVietnam War reflected racial and eco-nomic injustices in the United States?

Critical Thinking5. Synthesizing Why did support of the

Vietnam War begin to dwindle by thelate 1960s?

6. Organizing Use a graphic organizersimilar to the one below to list theeffects of the Tet offensive.


photograph on page 786. The phrase“flower power” was a slogan of the hip-pie movement. Explain what you thinkthe phrase meant to hippies and howthe slogan was used to express opposi-tion to the war.

8. Expository Writing Imagine that youare living in 1968. Write a paragraph forthe local newspaper in which youexplain your reasons for either support-ing or opposing the Vietnam War.

Effects ofTet Offensive

Opposition to the Vietnam War

Source: Public Opinion, the Gallup Poll.

Perc

enta

ge o

f Peo

ple

Agai

nst U

.S. I

nvol

vem

ent

20

30

1966 19671965 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973

40

50

60

70

Year

FirstU.S. troopsin Vietnam

Tetoffensive

Firstwithdrawal

of U.S. troops

Cease-fire signed

1. Interpreting Graphs During what two years wasopposition to the war lowest? What eventoccurred around that time?

2. Generalizing In what year did opposition to the Vietnam War peak? How was this sentimentlogically related to the withdrawal of Americantroops?


MotionIn

1969Secret peace negotiations betweenthe U.S. and North Vietnam begin


!1971

Nixon Moves to End the WarFrank Snepp was one of the last Americans to leave Vietnam. Shortly after taking

office, President Nixon had taken steps to end the nation’s involvement in the war, butthe final years of the conflict would yield much more bloodshed and turmoil.

As a first step, Nixon appointed Harvard professor Henry Kissinger as special assis-tant for national security affairs and gave him wide authority to use diplomacy to end theconflict. Kissinger embarked upon a policy he called linkage, which meant improving

On the evening of April 29, 1975, Frank Snepp, a young CIA officer, scrambled up tothe American embassy rooftop to catch one of the last helicopters out of Saigon.Throughout that day, Snepp had witnessed the desperation of the South Vietnamesepeople as they besieged the embassy grounds in an to effort escape the approachingCommunist army. Now he was leaving. Later, he recalled the scene:

“The roof of the Embassy was a vision out of a nightmare. In the center of the dimlylit helo-pad a CH-47 was already waiting for us, its engines setting up a roar like aprimeval scream. The crew and controllers all wore what looked like oversized footballhelmets, and in the blinking under-light of the landing signals they reminded me ofgrotesque insects rearing on their hindquarters. Out beyond the edge of the building aPhantom jet streaked across the horizon as tracers darted up here and there into thenight sky.”

—quoted in Decent Interval

The War Winds Down

Frank Snepp

1972Nixon initiatesChristmas bombings

1973Cease-fire signed

1975Evacuation of the lastAmericans from Vietnam

!1969 !1973 !1975

Main IdeaAfter nearly eight years of fighting inVietnam, the United States withdrew itsforces.

Key Terms and NamesHenry Kissinger, linkage, Vietnamization,Pentagon Papers, War Powers Act

Reading StrategyOrganizing As you read about the endof the Vietnam War, complete a graphicorganizer similar to the one below by list-ing the steps that President Nixon took toend American involvement in Vietnam.

Reading Objectives• Explain the events of Nixon’s first

administration that inspired more antiwar protests.

• Summarize the major lessons theUnited States learned from the Vietnam War experience.

Section ThemeGovernment and Democracy TheVietnam War led to changes in the way the U.S. military is deployed.

Steps Nixon Took

relations with the Soviet Union and China—suppliersof aid to North Vietnam—so he could persuade themto cut back on their aid.

Kissinger also rekindled peace talks with theNorth Vietnamese. In August 1969, Kissingerentered into secret negotiations with NorthVietnam’s negotiator, Le Duc Tho. In their talks,which dragged on for four years, Kissinger and LeDuc Tho argued over a possible cease-fire, the returnof American prisoners of war, and the ultimate fateof South Vietnam.

Meanwhile, Nixon cut back the number of Amer-ican troops in Vietnam. Known as Vietnamization,this process involved the gradual withdrawal of U.S.troops while South Vietnam assumed more of thefighting. On June 8, 1969, Nixon announced the with-drawal of 25,000 soldiers. Nixon refused to view thistroop withdrawal as a form of surrender. He wasdetermined to maintain a strong American presencein Vietnam to ensure bargaining power during peacenegotiations. In support of that goal, the presidentincreased airstrikes against North Vietnam andbegan bombing Vietcong sanctuaries in neighboringCambodia.

Identifying When did secret negoti-ations with the North Vietnamese begin?

Turmoil at Home ContinuesEven though the United States had begun

scaling back its involvement in Vietnam, theAmerican home front remained divided andvolatile as Nixon’s war policies stirred upnew waves of protest.

Massacre at My Lai In November 1969,Americans learned of a horrifying event.That month, the media reported that in thespring of 1968, an American platoonunder the command of Lieutenant WilliamCalley had massacred possibly more than200 unarmed South Vietnamese civiliansin the hamlet of My Lai. Most of the vic-tims were old men, women, and children.Calley eventually went to prison for hisrole in the killings.

Most American soldiers acted responsiblyand honorably throughout the war. Theactions of one soldier, however, increased thefeeling among many citizens that this was abrutal and senseless conflict. Jan Barry, afounder of the Vietnam Veterans Against the

War, viewed the massacre at My Lai as a symbol of thedilemma his generation faced in the conflict:

“To kill on military orders and be a criminal, or torefuse to kill and be a criminal is the moral agony ofAmerica’s Vietnam war generation. It is what hasforced upward of sixty thousand young Americans,draft resisters and deserters to Canada, and createdone hundred thousand military deserters a year inthis country and abroad.”

—quoted in Who Spoke Up?

The Invasion of Cambodia Sparks ProtestAmericans heard more startling news when Nixonannounced in April 1970 that American troops hadinvaded Cambodia. The troops wanted to destroyVietcong military bases there.

Many viewed the Cambodian invasion as a widen-ing of the war, and it set off many protests. At KentState University on May 4, 1970, Ohio National Guardsoldiers, armed with tear gas and rifles, fired ondemonstrators without an order to do so. The soldierskilled four students and wounded at least nine others.Ten days later, police killed two African American stu-dents during a demonstration at Jackson State College in Mississippi.

Reading Check

National Trauma When members of the Ohio National Guard fired on Kent State Universitydemonstrators, the event triggered a nationwide student strike that forced hundreds of collegesand universities to close. How does this image connect with the phrase “the war at home”?

History

The Pentagon Papers In addi-tion to sparking violence on cam-puses, the invasion of Cambodiacost Nixon significant congres-sional support. Numerous legisla-tors expressed outrage over thepresident’s failure to notify themof the action. In December 1970,an angry Congress repealed theGulf of Tonkin Resolution, whichhad given the president near com-plete power in directing the warin Vietnam.

Support for the war weakenedfurther in 1971 when DanielEllsberg, a disillusioned formerDefense Department worker,leaked what became known asthe Pentagon Papers to the NewYork Times. The documents re-vealed that many governmentofficials during the Johnsonadministration privately ques-tioned the war while publiclydefending it.

The documents contained details of decisions thatwere made by the presidents and their advisers with-out the consent of Congress. They also showed howthe various administrations acted to deceiveCongress, the press, and the public about the situa-tion in Vietnam. The Pentagon Papers confirmedwhat many Americans had long believed: The gov-ernment had not been honest with them.

Evaluating What did the PentagonPapers confirm for many Americans?

The United States Pulls Out of Vietnam

By 1971 polls showed that nearly two-thirds ofAmericans wanted to end the Vietnam War asquickly as possible. In April 1972, President Nixondropped his longtime insistence that NorthVietnamese troops had to withdraw from SouthVietnam before any peace treaty could be signed. In October, less than a month before the 1972 presidential election, Henry Kissinger emerged fromhis secret talks with Le Duc Tho to announce that“peace is at hand.”

A month later, Americans went to the polls todecide on a president. Senator George McGovern, the

Democratic candidate, was an outspoken critic of thewar. He did not appeal to many middle-classAmericans, however, who were tired of antiwar protesters. When the votes were cast, Nixon won re-election in a landslide.

The Two Sides Reach Peace Just weeks after thepresidential election, the peace negotiations brokedown. South Vietnam’s president, Nguyen VanThieu, refused to agree to any plan that left NorthVietnamese troops in the South. Kissinger tried towin additional concessions from the Communists,but talks broke off in mid-December.

The next day, to force North Vietnam to resumenegotiations, the Nixon administration began themost destructive air raids of the entire war. In whatbecame known as the “Christmas bombings,”American B-52s dropped thousands of tons of bombson North Vietnamese targets for 12 straight days,pausing only on Christmas day.

In the wake of the bombing campaign, the UnitedStates and North Vietnam returned to the bargainingtable. Thieu finally gave in to American pressure andallowed North Vietnamese troops to remain in theSouth. On January 27, 1973, the warring sides signedan agreement “ending the war and restoring thepeace in Vietnam.”

Reading Check


i n H i s t o r yRoy P.Benavidez1935–1998

Roy P. Benavidezreceived the Medal of Honor, the nation’shighest award for hero-ism, for his actions in the Vietnam War. Growingup, Benavidez worked onthe streets selling empty sodabottles and cleaning a localstockyard. His father’s family hadbeen vaqueros (cowboys fromMexico), immigrating in the1830s during the Texas War forIndependence. His mother, aYaqui Native American, was born innorthern Mexico. Both parents died by the time Benavidez was seven, and

he was raised byhis uncle.

A tough lifemade Benavidez afighter. In May 1968

while fighting inVietnam, Benavidez

rescued members of hisSpecial Forces group

who were surrounded bythe enemy. Wounded three

times while getting to themen by helicopter, he stayedwith them some eight hours,preparing an evacuation. Then

while carrying the men tothe rescue helicopters, he

was attacked from behind butmanaged to kill his attacker. Only afterloading all the dead and wounded didBenavidez himself board a helicopter.

The United States promised to withdraw the restof its troops, and both sides agreed to an exchange ofprisoners of war. The parties did not resolve the issueof South Vietnam’s future, however. After almosteight years of war—the longest war in American his-tory—the nation ended its direct involvement inVietnam.

South Vietnam Falls The United States had barelypulled out its last troops from Vietnam when thepeace agreement collapsed. In March 1975, the NorthVietnamese army launched a full-scale invasion ofthe South. Thieu desperately appealed toWashington, D.C., for help.

President Nixon had assured Thieu during thepeace negotiations that the United States “[would]respond with full force should the settlement be vio-lated by North Vietnam.” Nixon, however, hadresigned under pressure following the Watergate scan-dal. The new president, Gerald Ford, asked for fundsto aid the South Vietnamese, but Congress refused.

On April 30, the North Vietnamese capturedSaigon, South Vietnam’s capital, and united Vietnamunder Communist rule. They then renamed SaigonHo Chi Minh City.

Explaining Why did the peace talksbreak down in December 1972?

The Legacy of Vietnam“The lessons of the past in Vietnam,” President

Ford declared in 1975, “have already been learned—learned by Presidents, learned by Congress, learnedby the American people—and we should have ourfocus on the future.” Although Americans tried toput the war behind them, Vietnam left a deep andlasting impact on American society.

The War’s Human Toll The United States paid aheavy price for its involvement in Vietnam. The warhad cost the nation over $170 billion in direct costsand much more in indirect economic expenses. Moresignificantly, it had resulted in the deaths of approxi-mately 58,000 young Americans and the injury ofmore than 300,000. In Vietnam, around one millionNorth and South Vietnamese soldiers died in the con-flict, as did countless civilians.

Even after they returned home from fighting,some American veterans, as in other wars, found ithard to escape the war’s psychological impact. ArmySpecialist Doug Johnson recalled the problems hefaced on returning home:

“It took a while for me to recognize that I did suf-fer some psychological problems in trying to dealwith my experience in Vietnam. The first recollection I have of the effect took place shortly after I arrivedback in the States. One evening . . . I went to see amovie on post. I don’t recall the name of the movie orwhat it was about, but I remember there was a sadpart, and that I started crying uncontrollably. It hadn’tdawned on me before this episode that I had . . . suc-ceeded in burying my emotions. ”

—quoted in Touched by the Dragon

One reason it may have been harder for someVietnam veterans to readjust to civilian life was thatmany considered the war a defeat. Many Americanswanted to forget the war. Thus, the sacrifices of manyveterans often went unrecognized. There were rela-tively few welcome-home parades and celebrationsafter the war.

The war also lingered for the American familieswhose relatives and friends were classified as

Reading CheckDesperate Pleas When President Ford ordered all Americans to leaveVietnam immediately in April 1975, many Saigon residents stormed the U.S.embassy pleading for rescue. When did the North Vietnamese take control of Saigon?

History

prisoners of war (POWs) or missing in action (MIA).Despite many official investigations, these familieswere not convinced that the government had told thetruth about POW/MIA policies in the last years ofthe war.

The nation finally began to come to terms with thewar almost a decade later. In 1982 the nation dedi-cated the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington,D.C., a large black stone wall inscribed with thenames of those killed and missing in action in the war.“It’s a first step to remind America of what we did,”veteran Larry Cox of Virginia said at the dedication ofthe monument.

GOVERNMENT

The War’s Impact on the Nation The war also leftits mark on the nation as a whole. In 1973 Congresspassed the War Powers Act as a way to reestablishsome limits on executive power. The act required

the president to informCongress of any commitmentof troops abroad within 48hours and to withdraw themin 60 to 90 days unlessCongress explicitly approvedthe troop commitment.

The legislation addressesthe struggle between theexecutive and legislativebranches over what checksand balances are proper inmatters of war and foreignpolicy. No president hasrecognized this limitation,

and the courts have tended to avoid the issue as astrictly political question. In general, the war shookthe nation’s confidence and led some to embrace anew kind of isolationism. In the years after the war,many Americans became more reluctant to intervenein the affairs of other nations.

On the domestic front, the Vietnam War increasedAmericans’ cynicism about their government. Manyfelt the nation’s leaders had misled them. Togetherwith Watergate, a scandal that broke as the war waswinding down, Vietnam made Americans more waryof their leaders.

Describing How did the VietnamWar affect Americans’ attitudes toward international conflicts?

Reading Check


Checking for Understanding1. Define: linkage, Vietnamization.2. Identify: Henry Kissinger, Pentagon

Papers, War Powers Act.3. Describe what happened in Vietnam in

1975 after the United States withdrew.

Reviewing Themes4. Government and Democracy Why did

Congress pass the War Powers Act?How did this act reflect a strugglebetween the legislative and executivebranches?

Critical Thinking5. Analyzing Why did the invasion of

Cambodia cost President Nixon congressional support?

6. Organizing Use a graphic organizersimilar to the one below to list the effectsof the Vietnam War on the nation.


photograph on page 793 of SouthVietnamese citizens attempting to enterthe U.S. embassy. How do you thinkthis image affected American attitudestoward the war? Why do you think so?

8. Descriptive Writing Imagine that youare a college student in 1970. Write ajournal entry expressing your feelingsabout the events at Kent StateUniversity and Jackson State College.

Effects of Vietnam War


The War’s RefugeesAnother of the Vietnam War’s enduring legacies was

the wave of human migration and resettlement itprompted. From the mid-1970s through the 1980s,between 1.5 and 2 million people fled the newly installedCommunist regimes in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos.These men, women, and children became known as“boat people” because their main route of escape wasby sea. More than half of these refugees came to theUnited States. Between 1980 and 1990, the Vietnamesepopulation of the United States more than doubled fromabout 245,000 to almost 615,000. Why do you thinkthe United States was willing to accept so manyrefugees from the Vietnam War?

Student WebActivity Visit theAmerican RepublicSince 1877 Web site at

and click on StudentWeb Activities—Chapter 25 for anactivity on the Vietnam War.

HISTORY

tarvol2.glencoe.com


795

Social Studies

Conducting an InterviewWhy Learn This Skill?

Suppose that your friends went to see a concert,but you were unable to attend. How would youfind out how the show was?

Learning the SkillYou probably would not normally think of ask-

ing your friends questions about a concert as con-ducting an interview, but that is exactly what youare doing. Interviews are an excellent way of col-lecting important facts and opinions from people.Interviews allow you to gather information frompeople who witnessed or participated in an eventfirsthand. For example, William Prochnau inter-viewed many different people and used the resultsto write his book Once Upon a Distant War, whichexamines the way the press covered the VietnamWar. To conduct an interview with someone, followthese steps.

• Make an appointment. Contact the person andexplain why you want to conduct the interview,what kinds of things you hope to learn, and howyou will use the information. Discuss where andwhen you will conduct the interview, and ask ifyou may use a tape recorder.

• Gather background information. Find out about theeducation, career, and other accomplishments ofthe person you want to interview. Research thetopics you wish to discuss.

• Prepare questions. Group questions into subjectcategories. Begin each category with generalquestions and move toward more specific ques-tions. Formulate each question carefully. If theanswer could be simply yes or no, rephrase thequestion.

• Conduct the interview. Introduce yourself andrestate the purpose of the interview. Ask ques-tions and record responses accurately. Ask follow-up questions to fill gaps in information.

• Transcribe the interview. Convert your written ortape-recorded notes into a transcript, a writtenrecord of the interview presented in a question-and-answer format.

Practicing the SkillImagine you are assigned to interview someone

who participated in or is old enough to rememberthe events that occurred during the Vietnam War.

1 What kind of background information mightyou gather?

2 What are some broad categories of questionsyou might ask based on what you know aboutthe person you are interviewing and what youknow about the war?

3 What are some general questions you mightwant to ask within these broad categories?Consider the responses you might get to thesegeneral questions, and formulate follow-upquestions for each.

Skills AssessmentComplete the Practicing Skills questions on page

797 and the Chapter 25 Skill ReinforcementActivity to assess your mastery of this skill.

Applying the SkillConducting an Interview The Vietnam War probablyincluded some people you know—your parents,grandparents, aunts, uncles, or neighbors. Even if theywere not directly involved with the conflict, they proba-bly remember what the United States was like duringthe war. Use the questions you developed above tointerview one or more of these people. Ask about theirexperiences regarding Vietnam, including their atti-tudes toward the war and its many related issues, pastand present. Summarize your findings in a short reportor in a comparison chart.

Glencoe’s Skillbuilder Interactive WorkbookCD-ROM, Level 2, provides instruction andpractice in key social studies skills.

Reviewing Key Facts11. Identify: Ho Chi Minh, Tet offensive.12. How did President Eisenhower defend American policy in

Vietnam?13. When did the number of American military personnel begin

to increase in Vietnam?14. How did Vietnamese peasants respond to the strategic ham-

lets program?15. What actions made Ngo Dinh Diem an unpopular leader in

South Vietnam?16. What was the effect of the Tet offensive on Americans?17. How did Richard Nixon benefit from the chaos in the nation

in 1968?18. What did the Pentagon Papers reveal?

Critical Thinking19. Analyzing Themes: Civic Rights and Responsibilities How

did Americans show their frustration with the direction thecountry was taking in 1968?

20. Analyzing How do you think the use of chemicals such asAgent Orange and napalm by the United States affectedVietnamese feelings toward Americans and the war?

21. Organizing Use a graphic organizer to list the reasons theUnited States became involved in Vietnam and the effects thewar had on the nation.

22. Interpreting Primary Sources In the 1960s many youngAmericans enlisted or were drafted for military service. Somebelieved they had a duty to serve their country. Many had noclear idea of what they were doing or why. In the followingexcerpt, a young man interviewed for Mark Baker’s bookNam presents his thoughts about going to war.

“I read a lot of pacifist literature to determinewhether or not I was a conscientious objector. I finallyconcluded that I wasn’t. . . .

The one clear decision I made in 1968 about me andthe war was that if I was going to get out of it, I wasgoing to get out in a legal way. I was not going todefraud the system in order to beat the system. I wasn’tgoing to leave the country, because the odds of comingback looked real slim. . . .

1. domino theory

2. guerrilla

3. Vietcong

4. napalm

5. credibility gap

6. teach-in

7. dove

8. hawk

9. linkage

10. Vietnamization

Reviewing Key TermsOn a sheet of paper, use each of these terms in a sentence.

U. S. Involvementin Vietnam

Effects

Causes

• American people questioned the government’s honestyabout the war, creating the so-called “credibility gap”

• Wartime economy hurt domestic spending efforts• President Nixon was elected largely on promises to end

the war and unite the divided country

Roots of the Conflict

American Involvement in Vietnam

• Eisenhower financially supported French war against Vietnam

• Geneva Accords established North and South Vietnam• U.S.-backed leader of South Vietnam refused national

elections, fearing defeat by Communist opponent• Kennedy sharply increased military aid and presence in

South Vietnam• Johnson escalated U.S. involvement and gained

war powers after the incident in the Gulf of Tonkin

Full-Scale War• President Johnson responded to a Vietcong attack with

aggressive airstrikes; American people applauded his actions

• U.S. committed over 380,000 ground troops to fighting inVietnam by the end of 1966

Opposition to the War

The End of the War• Nixon withdrew troops but increased airstrikes • American troops pulled out after a 1973 peace agreement• Congress passed the War Powers Act to limit the power

of the president during times of war

With all my terror of going into the Army . . . therewas something seductive about it, too. I was seduced byWorld War II and John Wayne movies. . . . I had been, aswe all were, victimized by a romantic, truly uninformedview of war.”

—quoted in Nam

a. What options did the young man have regarding goingto war?

b. Do you think World War II movies gave him a realisticview of what fighting in Vietnam would be like?

Practicing Skills 23. Conducting an Interview Review the material on page 795

about interviewing. Then follow these steps to prepare for aninterview with President Johnson on his Vietnam policies.a. Study Section 2 of this chapter on the president’s Vietnam

policies and conduct library or Internet research on thissubject.

b. Prepare a list of 10 questions to ask the president.

Geography and History24. The map on this page shows supply routes and troop move-

ments during the Vietnam War. Study the map and answerthe questions below.a. Interpreting Maps What nations besides North and

South Vietnam were the sites of battles or invasions?b. Analyzing Why did the Ho Chi Minh Trail pass through

Laos and Cambodia instead of South Vietnam?

Chapter Activity25. Evaluating Bias A person’s life experiences often influence his

or her arguments one way or another, creating a biased opin-ion. Reread the speeches in Different Viewpoints on pages778–779. What might have influenced the points of view ofGeorge Ball and George Kennan? Create a cause-and-effectchart showing possible reasons for their biases and effects theirexperiences have had on their political opinions.

Writing Activity26. Portfolio Writing Many songs and pieces of literature

have been written on the Vietnam War. Find examples ofthese. Then write an original poem or song lyrics in whichyou present antiwar or pro-war sentiments about theVietnam War. Include your work in your portfolio.

N

S

EW

150 kilometers0Miller Cylindrical projection

150 miles0

MekongDelta

My Lai MassacreMarch 16, 1968

Invasion of LaosFeb. 8–March, 1971

Invasion of CambodiaMay 1–June 29, 1970

HoChi

Minh

Trail

110°E

20°N

10°N

17th Parallel

Gulf ofThailand

SouthChina

Sea

Gulf ofTonkin

LAOS

CHINA

THAILAND

CAMBODIA SOUTHVIETNAM

NORTHVIETNAM

Khe Sanh

Qui NhonPleiku

Ban Me ThuotNha Trang

Phoc Binh

Long Binh

Can ThoKhanh Hung

Quan Long

Tam KyChu Lai

Quang Tri

Da Nang

Demilitarized Zone

HanoiDien Bien Phu

Haiphong

Da NangHue

Saigon

Phnom Penh

The Vietnam War

Major U.S. andSouth Vietnamesetroop movementsMajor NorthVietnamesesupply linesU.S. bases

Self-Check QuizVisit the American Republic Since 1877 Web site at

and click on Self-Check Quizzes—Chapter 25 to assess your knowledge of chapter content.

HISTORY

tarvol2.glencoe.com

StandardizedTest Practice

Directions: Choose the phrase that bestcompletes the following statement.

The purpose of the War Powers Act was to ensure that thepresident wouldA have greater authority over the military.B consult Congress before committing troops to extended

conflicts.C have the authority to sign treaties without Senate

approval.D have a freer hand in fighting the spread of communism.

Test-Taking Tip: After Vietnam and Watergate, Congresswanted legislation to limit the president’s power duringwartime. Three of the answers actually do the opposite, giving the president more power. You can eliminate thesethree answers.


the vietnam war - mrs. hulsey's class · 1946 french-vietminh war begins 772 chapter 25 the...

Documents