the world bank...2012/07/23 · communities, who depend on the natural resources of lvb. 7b....

Document of

The World Bank

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Report No: 68315-AFR

RESTRUCTURING PAPER

ON A

PROPOSED PROJECT RESTRUCTURING OF THE

LAKE VICTORIA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT II (PHASE II)

CREDIT NO. 4973-RW; GRANT NO. H710-BI

June 13, 2011

TO

THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA

AND TO

THE REPUBLIC OF BURUNDI

June 20, 2012

Environment and Sustainable Management Unit

Sustainable Development Department

Africa Region

This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the

Performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World

Bank authorization.

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

APL Adaptable Program Lending

EAC East African Community

FA Financing Agreement

FLTF Fish Levy Trust Fund

IDA International Development Association

LVB Lake Victoria Basin

LVBC Lake Victoria Basin Commission

LVEMP I Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project I

LVEMP II Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project II

LVETF Lake Victoria Environmental Trust Fund

M&E Monitoring and Evaluation

MIS Management Information System

MTR Mid-Term Review

NPCT National Project Coordination Team

NPSC National Policy Steering Committee

PAD Project Appraisal Document

PDO Project Development Objective

REMA Rwanda Environmental Management Authority

RP Restructuring Paper

SLM Sustainable Land Management

SLMS Sustainable Land Management Strategy

WRMP Water Resources Management Plan

Regional Vice President: Makhtar Diop

Country Director: Elizabeth Laura Lule (Acting)

Sector Manager / Director: Idah Pswarayi-Riddihough / Jamal Saghir

Task Team Leader: Maria Isabel Junqueira Braga

AFRICA LAKE VICTORIA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT II (PHASE II)

P118316

Contents

DATA SHEET

A. SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 1

B. PROJECT STATUS .......................................................................................................................... 1

C. PROPOSED CHANGES .................................................................................................................. 2

ANNEX 1 A RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING ........................................................ 4

ANNEX 1 B RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING ........................................................ 6

ANNEX 2 REVISED DISBURSEMENT TABLES ........................................................................... 14

DATA SHEET

Restructuring Status: Draft Restructuring Type: Level one Last modified on date : 06/20/2012

1. Basic Information Project ID & Name P118316: 3A-Lake Victoria Phase II, APL 2

Country Africa

Task Team Leader Maria Isabel Junqueira Braga

Sector Manager/Director Idah Z. Pswarayi-Riddihough

Country Director Elizabeth Laura Lule

Original Board Approval Date 06/13/2011

Original Closing Date: 06/30/2017

Current Closing Date 06/30/2017

Proposed Closing Date [if applicable]

EA Category B-Partial Assessment

Revised EA Category B-Partial Assessment-Partial Assessment

EA Completion Date

Revised EA Completion Date

2. Revised Financing Plan (US$m) Source Original Revised

BORR 0.00 0.00

IDA 15.00 15.00

IDAT 15.00 15.00

Total 30.00 30.00

3. Borrower Organization Department Location

Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning Rwanda

Ministry of Finance Burundi

4. Implementing Agency Organization Department Location

Rwanda Environmental Management

Agency

Rwanda

MEEATU Burundi

5. Disbursement Estimates (US$m) Actual amount disbursed as of 06/14/2012 1.28

Fiscal Year Annual Cumulative

2012 0.00 1.28

2013 2.28 3.56

2014 4.44 8.00

2015 6.00 14.00

2016 7.00 21.00

2017 9.00 30.00

Total 30.00

6. Policy Exceptions and Safeguard Policies Does the restructured project require any exceptions to Bank policies? N

Does the restructured projects trigger any new safeguard policies? If yes, please select

from the checklist below and update ISDS accordingly before submitting the package.

N

7a. Project Development Objectives/Outcomes Original/Current Project Development Objectives/Outcomes

The objectives of the Project are to (i) improve the collaborative management of the trans-boundary natural

resources of the LVB for the shared benefits of the Partner States; and (ii) reduce environmental stress in

targeted pollution hotspots and selected degraded sub-catchments to improve the livelihoods of

communities, who depend on the natural resources of LVB.

7b. Revised Project Development Objectives/Outcomes [if applicable]

The objectives of the Project are to contribute to: (i) the improvement of the collaborative management of

the trans-boundary natural resources of the LVB among the Partner States; and (ii) the improvement of

environmental management of targeted pollution hotspots and selected degraded sub-catchments for the

benefit of communities who depend on the natural resources of LVB.

1

AFRICA

LAKE VICTORIA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT II (PHASE II)

RESTRUCTURING PAPER

A. SUMMARY

1. This Restructuring Paper (RP) responds to the requests of the Governments of Rwanda

(April 27, 2012) and Burundi (April 26, 2012) and seeks the approval of the Board to make the

following changes to the Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project II (Phase II):

Revise the Project Development Objective (PDO) so that it is aligned with the revised PDO

for the Phase I project in this horizontal APL.

Add “Incremental Operating Costs” to disbursement Categories (1), (2), and (3); and

Establish that the local project coordination teams should be in place prior to implementation

of any activities under the Project in participating districts, instead of the original date of

March 30, 2012.

For Burundi only, add "Procurement from United Nations Agencies" as one of the authorized

methods Schedule 2, section III B.2. The method is already described in the PAD (paragraph

45 in page 60) but was left out of the Financing Agreement (FA).

For Rwanda only, add the Director General of the Rwanda Environmental Management

Agency (REMA), the Implementing Agency, as a member of the National Policy Steering

Committee (NPSC).

Modify some of the project indicators and targets to adapt to the new PDO so that they: (i)

better support the monitoring of project impacts; and (ii) define outcomes that are within the

control of, and can be delivered by, the implementing agencies during the life of the project.

2. In addition, the first and second PDO level indicators will be revised so that they are

aligned with the equivalent ones in the Results Framework for the Phase I project in this

horizontal APL.

B. PROJECT STATUS

3. Background. The Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project II is a regional

APL with three envisioned phases. This Restructuring Paper relates to Phase II which involves

an IDA credit to the Republic of Rwanda and an IDA grant to the Republic of Burundi. The

project, approved by the Board in June of 2011, will help address organic pollution and erosion

sediments coming into Lake Victoria through the Kagera river.

4. Phase I, approved by the Board on March 3, 2009, is also being restructured at this time

and involves Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, and the East African Community (EAC) (see the

Restructuring Paper for Phase I, report 68287-AFR). Phase III, with a greater focus on on-the-

ground investments, would potentially follow after implementation of Phase I reaches a series of

agreed implementation benchmarks. Completion of both Phase I and Phase II are required to

2

generate positive impacts on the environmental conditions in Lake Victoria basin (LVB) and of

Lake Victoria itself.

5. The project has a multi-sectoral design involving four components: (i) Strengthening

institutional capacity for managing shared water and fisheries resources; (ii) Point source

pollution control and prevention; (iii) Watershed management; and (iv) Project coordination and

management.

6. This project, Phase II of the APL series, became effective at the end of December 2011.

The core National Project Coordination Teams (NPCTs) are in place and the first disbursement

has taken place for Burundi and Rwanda. Both teams have also started the process to hire

additional technical staff for the respective National Project Coordination Teams. The first

implementation support mission took place in March of 2012 and the Bank team was well

impressed by the capacity and commitment of the Rwanda and the Burundi NPCTs.

C. PROPOSED CHANGES

7. LVEMP II is structured as a horizontal APL, and as such all project phases must share

the same PDO. At the latter stages of project preparation it was already known that Phase I

would undergo a restructuring involving a change in the PDO, and as such it was agreed that

Phase II would also be restructured along with Phase I to ensure harmonization of any aspects

involved in the restructuring which might also impact Phase II – such as a change in the PDO.

8. Project Development Objectives. The original PDO refers more to the objectives of the

LVEMP II program as a whole instead of the objectives of each of the three Phases under this

APL, and some of the outcomes would only be measurable in the medium term after a

substantial level of investments had been done in LVB. This change will also address the

difficulty to measure “shared benefits” and “improvement in livelihoods of communities” during

the time of project implementation. As such, the PDO will be modified from “The objectives of

the Project are to (i) improve the collaborative management of the trans-boundary natural

resources of the LVB for the shared benefits of the Partner States; and (ii) reduce environmental

stress in targeted pollution hotspots and selected degraded sub-catchments to improve the

livelihoods of communities, who depend on the natural resources of LVB” to “The objectives of

the Project are to contribute to: (i) the improvement of the collaborative management of the

trans-boundary natural resources of the LVB among the Partner States; and (ii) the

improvement of environmental management of targeted pollution hotspots and selected degraded

sub-catchments for the benefit of communities who depend on the natural resources of LVB.”

9. Modification of the first outcome indicator is also proposed to ensure that the target is

within the control of, and can be delivered by, the Implementing Agencies. The revised Results

Framework is provided in Annex 1.

10. Disbursement arrangements. It is agreed that Incremental Operating Costs are an

Eligible Expenditure under disbursement Categories (1), (2), and (3) in the disbursement table of

each FA. This change allows for the financing of activities such as fuel, meals and lodging, for

project technical staff who go to the field to provide technical assistance and capacity building to

3

farmers, communities, and local government, which are essential to achieve project outcomes

under Components 1, 2, and 3 of the project.

11. Procurement. For Burundi only, it is agreed that procurement from United Nations

Agencies is one of the authorized procurement methods under the project. Although already

mentioned in the PAD (paragraph 45 in page 60), this type of procurement method was

inadvertently left out of the Financing Agreement.

12. Implementation Arrangements. For Rwanda only, it is agreed that the Director General

of REMA, who is the head of the implementing agency for LVEMP II, will be a member of the

National Policy Steering Committee (NPSC). In addition, it is agreed that in both countries the

local project coordination teams should be in place prior to implementation of any activities

under the Project in participating districts, instead of the original date of March 30, 2012. This is

to avoid the rush of creating such teams in areas where actual activities and investments would

only start later in project implementation as established in the project implementation plan.

4

ANNEX 1 A

Results Framework and Monitoring

AFRICA: LAKE VICTORIA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT II PHASE II

SUMMARY AND JUSTIFICATION FOR PROPOSED CHANGES

PDO Original Indicator Action Proposed Rationale for Change The objectives of the Project

are to

(i) improve the collaborative

management of the trans-

boundary natural resources of

the LVB for the shared benefits

of the Partner States; and

(ii) reduce environmental stress

in targeted pollution hotspots

and selected degraded sub-

catchments to improve the

livelihoods of communities,

who depend on the natural

resources of LVB.

Revised The objectives of the Project are to

contribute to: (i) the improvement of the

collaborative management of the trans-

boundary natural resources of the LVB

among the Partner States; and (ii) the

improvement of environmental management

of targeted pollution hotspots and selected

degraded sub-catchments for the benefit of

communities who depend on the natural

resources of LVB.

As per OPCS requirement there needs to be an

outcome indicator for each PDO aspect. It is difficult

to measure the „shared benefits of the Partner states‟

and „improvement in livelihoods of communities,

who depend on the natural resources of LVB‟ in the

duration of the project. Also, the PDO should refer

to outcomes of the specific project and not to those of

the APL program as a whole, and measurable

reductions in environmental stress in LVB will only

take place after a substantial level of investments are

done under the APL series and other complementary

initiatives in the region.

PDO indicators

Current (PAD) Proposed

Adoption by Rwanda and

Burundi of harmonized policies

and regulatory frameworks for

water and fisheries

management

Revised A draft harmonized policy on water

management and agreement on a strategy

and timeframe, submitted by LVBC to the

Council of Ministers for adoption of the

policy by 2014.

A draft harmonized policy on fisheries

management and agreement on a strategy

and timeframe, submitted by LVBC to the

Council of Ministers for adoption of the

policy by 2014

Adoption of policies is a political process that

requires legislative/ parliamentary approval in each

country, which timing is outside the control of the

project and likely to be longer than the period of

project implementation. Also, the achievements

related to water and to fisheries policies were

separated in two different indicators to allow for

better monitoring of results.

5

Intermediate Results indicators

Original Indicator (PAD) Proposed Rationale for Change

Component 1. Strengthening Institutional capacity for managing shared water and fisheries resources

1.1 Harmonization of policies, legislations, and regulatory standards

Number of countries that have

adopted and are implementing

harmonized water and fisheries

policy, legal, and regulatory

standards

Revised Regional standards for industrial and

municipal effluent discharges for adoption

by participating countries in place

Same as original PDO indicator – hence dropped

original

Added an indicator for harmonization of

industrial and municipal effluent discharges; this

is an important aspect given the increasing

pollution load from municipal wastewaters

Number of countries

implementing the regional

WRMP, Updated FMP, SLMS,

and FLFTs

Revised Fisheries Management Plan (FMP) updated Original indicator combines various strategic

plans which are at different stages, and is

ambitious given the time frame.

6

ANNEX 1 B

Results Framework and Monitoring


REVISED RESULTS FRAMEWORK

Project Development Objective (PDO): The objectives of the Project are to: (i) improve the collaborative management of the transboundary natural resources of the LVB for the

shared benefits of the Partner States; and (ii) reduce environmental stress in targeted pollution hotspots and selected degraded sub-catchments to improve the livelihoods of

communities, who depend on the natural resources of LVB.

Revised Project Development Objective: The objectives of the Project are to contribute to: (i) the improvement of the collaborative management of the trans-boundary natural

resources of the LVB among the Partner States; and (ii) the improvement of environmental management of targeted pollution hotspots and selected degraded sub-catchments for

the benefit of communities who depend on the natural resources of LVB.

Results

Indicators Co

re D=dropped

C=Continue

N=New

R=Revised

Unit of

Measure Baseline

Cumulative Target Values

Frequency

Data

Source/

Methodolo

gy

Responsibil

ity for Data

Collection

Description FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

PDO LEVEL RESULT INDICATORS

1. Adoption by

Rwanda and

Burundi of

harmonized

policies and

regulatory

frameworks for

water and

fisheries

management

R

addressed

through

indicators

1 and 2

Cumulative

percentage

20 50 100 100 100 100

Semi-

Annually

Records/

Progress

Reports

LVBC/

NPCT

Cumulative

percentage

completion of

policies, legislation,

and regulations

review process in

Year 1 and 2; and

formal adoption by

countries in Year 3

Indicator One:

A draft

harmonized

policy on water

management and

agreement on a

strategy and

timeframe for

adoption,

submitted by

LVBC and

R

Yes/No

Existing

national

water

policies

not yet

harmonize

d to

consider

basinwide

manageme

nt of water

First

draft of

consult

ant

report

being

examin

ed by

Partner

s

No Yes Yes Yes Yes Annually

Records/

Progress

Reports

RPCT/

NPCT

Adoption means

formal presentation

to and adoption by

the Sectoral Council

of Ministers for the

Lake Victoria Basin

where the five EAC

Partner States are

represented.

7

Results

Indicators Co

re D=dropped

C=Continue

N=New

R=Revised

Unit of

Measure Baseline


Frequency

Data

Source/

Methodolo

gy

Responsibil

ity for Data

Collection


approved by the

Council of

Ministers.

resources

Indicator Two:

A draft

harmonized

policy on

fisheries

management and

agreement on a

strategy and

timeframe,

submitted by

LVBC and

approved by the

Council of

Ministers.

R

Yes/No

Preliminar

y review of

policies

being

coordinate

d by

LVBC

under

Phase I

TORs

under

review

No Yes Yes Yes Yes Annually

Records/

Progress

Reports

RPCT/

NPCT

Adoption means

formal presentation

to and adoption by

the Sectoral Council

of Ministers for the

Lake Victoria Basin

where the five EAC

Partner States are

represented.

Indicator

Three:

Number of urban

pollution

hotspots

adressed through

investments to

control

wastewater

pollution.

C Cumulative

Number

RW: 0

[one

District of

Kigali has

technical

designs]

0 0 1 2 4 6

Annual

Records/

Progress

Reports

MININFRA

/ NPCT

Potential point

source pollution

hotspots are:

municipal

slaughterhouses,

markets, bus

stations, soccer

field, schools, health

clinics, etc.

BU: 14

[Gitega] 14 14 18 28 38 48

MINISANTE/

NPCT

Indicator Four:

Number of

hectares under

sustainable land

management

practices in the

targeted sub-

C

Cumulative

number RW: 0 0 1,000 2,000 3,500 4,000 5,000 Annual

Records/

surveys

Districts/

Communes,

NPCT

Examples of SLM

practices are: grass

strips/trash lines,

agro-forestry,

intercropping with

plant cover and

green manure, soil

8

Results

Indicators Co

re D=dropped

C=Continue

N=New

R=Revised

Unit of

Measure Baseline


Frequency

Data

Source/

Methodolo

gy

Responsibil

ity for Data

Collection


catchments.

BU: 0 0 1,200 2,500 4,000 6,500 8,000

bunds, construction

of terraces,

reforestation and

afforestation, and

protection of water

springs.

Indicator Six:

Direct project

beneficiaries

(number), of

which are female

(%)1

C

Number

and

Cumulative

percentage

RW: 0

(Gvt.

requires a

minimum

of 30%)

0

(0%)

800

30%

1,600

30%

2,800

35%

3,200

35%

4,000

35%

Yearly

Records

/

Progres

s

Reports

NPCT

For Burundi, this

indicator also

includes the number

of children

benefitting from

access to improved

sanitation facilities

at education

institutions.

BU: 0

(Constitu-

tion

requires a

minimum

of 30%)

29,000

(0%)

33,00

0

30%

37,50

0

35%

41,30

0

35%

42,300

40%

42,300

40%

INTERMEDIATE RESULT INDICATORS

Component 1: Strengthening institutional capacity for managing shared water and fisheries resources

Subcomponent 1.1. intermediate result:

LVB countries use harmonized policy, legal, and regulatory standards (water and fish quality), management (water and fisheries) frameworks, and Fish Levy Trust Funds (FLTF) for the sustainable use

of shared transboundary natural resources

1.1.1. Regional

standards for

industrial and

municipal

effluent

discharges for

adoption by

participating

R Yes/No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Biannually Documents

produced

RPCT/NPC

T

1 Each household benefitting from activities carried out under Component 3 will be counted as one direct project beneficiary. The total number of project beneficiaries (direct +

indirect) has been estimated at 62,300 for Burundi (considering an average of 5 members per household benefitting under Component 3 and including the number of children

benefitting from improved sanitation facilities) and at 20,000 for Rwanda (considering also an average of 5 members per household). The target percentage of women who are

direct project beneficiaries under component 3 is higher for Burundi because there are more rural households headed by women (e.g. widows)

9

Results

Indicators Co

re D=dropped

C=Continue

N=New

R=Revised

Unit of

Measure Baseline


Frequency

Data

Source/

Methodolo

gy

Responsibil

ity for Data

Collection


countries in

place.

1.1.2. Number of

countries with

Fisheries

Management

Plan (FMP)

updated.

R

Number 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 Biannually Documents

produced

RPCT/NPC

T


LVBC and countries use reliable environmental health and natural resources (land, water, and fisheries) data of the Basin ecosystem for policy decisions and planning sustainable development and

management

1.2.1. Number of

countries with

functional Lake

Victoria

Ecosystem

Management

Information

Systems (GIS-

based MIS) that

are available for

public access

and updated on

annual basis

C

Number 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 Quarterly Records RPCT/NPC

T

Component 2: Point sources pollution control and prevention


Targeted lake shore cities, towns and communities with improved wastewater management

2.1.1. Number of

urban centers

with assessment

of point source

pollution

hotspots

(Pollution

C Cumulative

number

RW: 1 1

1

3

3

5

6

7

6

7

6

7

6 Annually

Surveys/

Records

MININFRA

, Districts,

NPCT

BU: 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Provinces,

NPCT

10

Results

Indicators Co

re D=dropped

C=Continue

N=New

R=Revised

Unit of

Measure Baseline


Frequency

Data

Source/

Methodolo

gy

Responsibil

ity for Data

Collection


Control Plans)

2.1.2. Number of

education

centers with

improved on-site

sanitation

facilities – only

for Burundi

C

Cumulative

number

10 16 22 28 34 34 34 Annual Records NPCT

These targets are

only for Burundi


Increased adoption of cleaner production technologies and sustainable consumption by targeted industries

2.2.1.Target

industries in the

LVB adopting

Cleaner

Production

Technologies

C

Number

0

(25 target

industries)

1 2 5 8 8 Annually Records/

surveys

NPCT/

RPCT

2.2.2.Target

industries in the

LVB adhering to

the harmonized

effluent

standards

C

Number

0

(25 target

industries)

1 2 3 5 Annually Records/

surveys

NPCT/

RPCT

Component 3: Watershed management

Subcomponents 3.1.and 3.2. intermediate result:

Increased adoption of sustainable land management (SLM) and natural resources conservation practices by participating communities in the targeted sub-catchments

3.1.1. Number of

hectares of

degraded

wetlands

restored and/or

rehabilitated by

communities in

C Cumulative

number

RW: 800 820 840 860 880 900 1,000

Annual Records/

surveys

Districts/

NPCT

BU: 0 75 150 250 300 300

11

Results

Indicators Co

re D=dropped

C=Continue

N=New

R=Revised

Unit of

Measure Baseline


Frequency

Data

Source/

Methodolo

gy

Responsibil

ity for Data

Collection


targeted sub-

catchments

3.1.2. Proportion

of farmers in

project

intervention

areas using

improved farm

methods

(disaggregated

by gender)

C Percentage

RW2

0%

10%

30%

40%

60%

80%

Annual Survey

NPCT/local

government

s

Examples of

improved farm

methods are: better

seeds and seedlings,

IPM, soil fertility

management,

conservation tillage,

agro-forestry ,

intercropping with

tree cover and green

manure, use manure

or compost &

mulching, liming

BU3

0%

10%

30%

40%

60%

80%

3.1.4.

Development of

National

Strategic Plan

for Wetland

Conservation

C Yes/No

Rwanda:

Marshland

law

recently

approved

Yes4

Yes

Yes

Annual

Records/

Governme

nt Gazette

NPCT

Burundi:

No Yes

5 Yes Yes Yes


Enhanced communities‟ ability to plan, implement, and monitor watershed management interventions in the targeted sub-catchments

2 Baseline to be defined during first year of project implementation 3 Ibid 4 Progress targets for each year are defined as follows: Year 1, Consultation process for setting priorities in wetland conservation; Year 2, Drafting of new Strategic Plan and

submission to the relevant authorities for approval; Year 3: Strategic Plan under implementation. 5 Progress targets for each year are defined as follows: Year 1, Review of current policies, regulations and plans; Year 2, Consultation process for setting priorities in wetland

conservation; Year 3, Drafting of new Strategic Plan and submission to the relevant authorities for approval; Year 4: Strategic Plan under implementation

12

Results

Indicators Co

re D=dropped

C=Continue

N=New

R=Revised

Unit of

Measure Baseline


Frequency

Data

Source/

Methodolo

gy

Responsibil

ity for Data

Collection


3.3.1. Percent of

community

natural resource

management

subprojects

whose

implementation

is rated

satisfactory or

better in the

targeted sub-

catchments

C

Cumulative

percentage 0 15 25 45 60 60 60 Quarterly Records

Districts/

NPCT

Rating will be done

with participation

from an assigned

external party, based

on criteria defined in

the implementation

manual

Component 4: Project coordination and management


Increased accountability of both regional and national institutions responsible for managing shared resources of the LVB

4,1,1

Communication

notes, with

summary reports

on project

achievements

and progress on

indicators, are

made available

to stakeholders

at least on a

quarterly basis.

C

Number or

yearly

reports

0

Consul-

tancy to

define

format

and

content

of notes

2 4 4 4 4 Quarterly Records NPCT


Improved management of the project by the implementing agencies and local communities through utilization of M&E and MIS information for decision-making, and development planning.

13

Results

Indicators Co

re D=dropped

C=Continue

N=New

R=Revised

Unit of

Measure Baseline


Frequency

Data

Source/

Methodolo

gy

Responsibil

ity for Data

Collection


4.2.1. M&E

system

implemented and

updated

according to

schedule

C

Yes/No Yes6 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Annually Records NPCT

4.2.2. MIS

system

implemented and

updated

regularly

according to

schedule.

C

Yes/No Yes7 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Annually Records NPCT

6 Progress targets for each year are defined as follows: Year 1, Baseline established, and consultancy to implement system contracted; Year 2, System operational and baseline data

entered in the system; Year 3, Monitoring data for years 2 and 3 entered into the system and regular reports genera-ted at least quarterly; Year 4, M&E system updated according to

schedule and reports genera-ted at least quarterly; Year 5, M&E system updated according to schedule and reports generated at least quarterly; Year 6, M&E system updated

according to schedule and reports genera-ted at least quarterly. 7 Progress targets for each year are defined as follows: Year 1, Consultancy hired to design and implement MIS; Year 2, MIS implemented and operational by end of year 2; Year

3, All data for years 1 to 3 entered into MIS and regular reports genera-ted at least quarterly; Year 4, MIS system updated on real time and reports genera-ted at least quarterly;

Year 5, MIS system updated on real time and reports genera-ted at least quarterly; Year 6, MIS system updated on real time and reports genera-ted at least quarterly.

14

ANNEX 2

Revised Disbursement Tables


Table 2a: Amount of the Credit Allocated

(Credit No. 4973-RW)

Category

Amount of the

Financing Allocated

(expressed in SDR)

Percentage of

Expenditures to be

Financed

(inclusive of Taxes)

(1) Goods, works, non-consulting services,

consultants‟ services, and Incremental Operating

Costs for Part 1 of the Project

600,000 100%


consultants‟ services, and Incremental Operating

Costs for Part 2 of the Project

2,900,000 100%


consultants‟ services, Incremental Operating Costs ,

and Training for Part 3(a), (b) and (c)(i) of the Project

2,900,000 100%

(4) Goods, non-consulting services, consultants‟

services, Training and Incremental Operating Costs

for Part 4 of the Project

1,400,000 100%

(5) Goods, works and services for Subprojects under

Part 3(c)(ii) of the Project and to be financed out of

the proceeds of a Sub-Grant

700,000 100%

(6) Unallocated 800,000

TOTAL 9,300,000

15

Table 2b: Amount of the Grant Allocated

(Grant No. H710-BI)

Category

Amount of the

Financing Allocated

(expressed in SDR)

Percentage of

Expenditures to

be Financed

(inclusive of

Taxes)

(1) Goods, works, non-consulting services, consultants‟

services, and Incremental Operating Costs for Part 1 of the

Project

1,350,000 100%


services, and Incremental Operating Costs for Part 2 of the

Project

1,350,000 100%


services, Incremental Operating Costs, and Training for Part

3(a), (b) and (c)(i) of the Project

3,650,000 100%

(4) Goods, non-consulting services, consultants‟ services,

Training and Incremental Operating Costs for Part 4 of the

Project

1,750,000 100%

(5) Goods, works and services for

Subprojects under Part 3(c)(ii) of the Project and to be

financed out of the proceeds of a Sub-Grant

400,000 100%

(6) Unallocated 800,000

TOTAL 9,300,000