the world of steel─鋼鐵的世界 - 6 september 2011 china prices … · 2011. 9. 6. · steel...
TRANSCRIPT
the average operating profit margin of China’s steel
mills last year was just 3%. This operating margin in-
cludes not only finance costs, but also depreciation,
which is not a cash flow. When we remove the effects
of depreciation, we discover that Chinese mills’ free
cash flow is better than would first appear.
A further look at mill
profitability
In Profile: Xinxing Ductile Iron Pipe 8
Smaller increases in depreciation for other
Asian mills
Mill profitability is reduced due to high de-
preciation across the sector
4
Week in review: Iron ore prices back over
$180/t as mills report lower profits
3
5
SBB Analytics CHINA is published weekly by SBB's office in Shanghai. Contact us for further information regarding the Chinese steel industry. If you did not receive this directly, please visit www.steelbb.com/analyticschina/ for trial and subscription details. SBB China Ltd Rm 3301 Shanghai Plaza 138 Huaihai Middle Road Shanghai 200021, China t: +86 (0)21 5110 5488
SBB Head Office Peek House 20 Eastcheap London EC3M 1EB, UK t: +44 (0)20 7645 9400
© Steel Business Briefing 2011 www.sbb.com Page 1
China Prices
RMB/t
Prices taken from www.steelbb.com/steelpriceslist/ www.thesteelindex.com
$/t
Steel prices include 17% VAT
6 September 2011
The Steel Index’s (TSI) 62% Fe iron ore reference price
last week climbed above $180/t cfr China for the first
time since early May. The rise in iron prices comes just
as mills, such as Baoshan Iron & Steel, are starting to
report lower earnings for Q2.
Compared with the average Chinese mill, other major
Asian steel mills saw much smaller increases in depre-
ciation charges. This is in part due to the very different
operating conditions outside China.
Published since 2005 by SBB Shanghai
Issue #219
w/e 2 Sep w-o-w
change (RMB)
w-o-w change
(%)
HRC RMB/t 4,775 0 0.00%
CRC RMB/t 5,395 0 0.00%
Rebar RMB/t 4,745 -10 -0.21%
Rebar-1 month forward
RMB/t 4,705 -229 -4.64%
Rebar-3 month forward
RMB/t 4,899 72 1.5%
Seamless pipe RMB/t 5,850 25 0.4%
Welded pipe RMB/t 5,150 25 0.5%
TSI 62% Fe Fines ($/t, CFR China)
$/t 181 2 1.3%
Capesize Iron Ore W. Australia - China
$/t 10.77 1.44 15.4%
125
150
175
200
Sep 10 Nov 10 Jan 11 Apr 11 Jun 11 Aug 11
Iron ore fines 62% Fe CFR China
3750
4000
4250
4500
4750
5000
Sep 10 Nov 10 Jan 11 Apr 11 Jun 11 Aug 11
Rebar
HRC
Last week’s industry news
X i n j i a n g
N i n g x i a
Q i n g h a i
G a n s u
S h a a n x i
T i b e t
Y u n n a n
G u i z h o u
S i c h u a n
C h o n g q i n g
H a i n a n
G u a n g x i G u a n g d o n g
H u n a n
H u b e i
H e n a n
S h a n d o n g
J i a n g x i
F u j i a n
A n h u i
Z h e j i a n g
J i a n g s u
S h a n g h a i
H e i l o n g j i a n g
J i l i n
L i a o n i n g
I n n e r M o n g o l i a
S h a n x i
H e b e i
T i a n j i n
B e i j i n g
Subscriber Edition 13 January 2011
SBBAnalyticsChina
Shanghai Municipality Baosteel Baosteel will boost its grain-oriented silicon steel capacity from its current 100,000 t/y to 300,000 t/y by 2013. In addition, during the same period Baosteel will add an extra 210,000 t/y of non-grain oriented silicon sheet capacity. Two GO silicon steel mills are currently under construction at Baosteel, each with a capacity of 100,000 t/y. The 210,000 t/y NGO silicon steel mill is scheduled to be commissioned in June 2013.
© Steel Business Briefing 2011 www.sbb.com Page 2
6 September 2011
Shandong Province Xingda Steel Tyre Cord Hong Kong-listed Xingda International Holding Limited, one of China’s largest tyre cord makers, expects to boost its capacity to about 700,000 t/y of tyre cord by 2013. The company will add 50,000 t/y of tyre cord capacity in 2012 and another 50,000 t/y in 2013. Xingda will also meet its 700,000 t/y capacity target by conducting simultaneous expansion at its No.9 plant at its main production facilities.
Shandong Province Bekaert Belgium-based global wire producer Bekaert has completed the acquisition of Chinese wire rod and wire plant Qingdao Hansun, which produces galvanised wire rod and steel rope for applications in the construction,
paper manufacturing, mining and other sectors , The plant will be renamed Bekaert (Qingdao) Wire Products.
Official inflation and housing construction data for August should hint at the extent of the summer slowdown, if indeed such a slowdown occurred.
...and the week to come
SBBAnalyticsChina
© Steel Business Briefing 2011 www.sbb.com Page 3
Subscriber Edition 2 November 2010 Subscriber Edition 16 November 2010 Subscriber Edition 13 January 2011
The week in review
Iron ore prices back over $180/t as mills report lower profits
The Steel Index’s (TSI) 62% Fe iron ore reference price last week climbed
above $180/dmt cfr China for the first time since early May. Continuing tight
supplies in the seaborne iron market have been slowly pushing prices upward
for the last weeks, as it now seems unlikely any shipments from Karnataka will
happen before next year. India’s government is now also looking into imposing
similar regulations in Goa, which if implemented could even further limit
supplies of the steelmaking raw material.
The next quarter promises mills little relief from high iron ore prices. Indicative
Q4 contract prices based on TSI’s 62% Fe, 2% Al index over June-August fell
1.1% from last quarter to $168.7/dmt fob West Australia, though prices remain
near record highs. Meanwhile, iron ore port stocks rose to another record level
last week. Speculative buying on contract by Chinese mills expecting further
price rises is one of the key drivers behind the recent surge in port stocks.
The rise in iron prices comes just as mills are starting to report lower earnings
for Q2. Baoshan Iron & Steel (Baosteel) saw its Q2 net profit drop by 34.5% to
RMB 2 billion, while its net profit margin fell from 5.7% to 3.5% (see Figure 3,
next page). The mill blamed high raw material costs, which were at an all-time
record high according to TSI’s calculation (see Figure 2 above), as well as
weaker end-user demand for the fall in profits. The mill’s H1 net profit also fell
by 36.9% to RMB 5.07bn.
Baosteel’s attempts to pass on higher costs to customers in Q3 might also be
meeting some resistance. Baosteel announced three weeks ago it was raising
its HRC and CRC prices by RMB100-150/t for September delivery, a move
that was soon followed by a number of other major mills. However, flats prices
have remained mostly unchanged since the announcement, and eastern
China’s Shagang also announced last week it would keep HRC list prices for
September unchanged, citing continued weak buying at current price levels.
6 September 2011
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
07-Jan-11 07-Apr-11 07-Jul-11
Source: SXCoal, SBB Research
Figure 1. Iron ore port stocks hit new record high last week
m t
Source: The Steel Index (TSI), SBB Research
Figure 2. Q4 contract iron ore price down a bit but still near record highs
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200TSI 62% Fe 2% Al fob W. Australia indicative contract price
TSI 62% Fe 2% Al fob W. Australia reference price
SBBAnalyticsChina
© Steel Business Briefing 2011 www.sbb.com Page 4
Subscriber Edition 2 November 2010 Subscriber Edition 16 November 2010 Subscriber Edition 13 January 2011
A further look at mill profitability
Mill profitability is reduced due to high depreciation across the sector
According to the China Iron and Steel Association (CISA), the average
operating profit margin of China’s steel mills last year was just 3%. This
operating margin includes not only finance costs, but also depreciation.
Depreciation is an accounting convention which allocates the cost of an asset
over its useful life by deducting a set percentage of the seet’s cost every year
from the profit and loss account (the income statement) of the company. Every
time a steel company invests in new capacity or upgrades its production
facilities, the new assets will be depreciated, affecting profitability as the
depreciation of these assets is deducted from the company’s income
statement.
It is important to note that depreciation, unlike raw materials, electricity or
labour, is not a cash expense and as long as it has positive cash flow, a
company can carry on operating with very low or even negative profitability if
this is solely a result of depreciation. We have thus chosen to analyze Chinese
mills’ EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization),
which as it excludes depreciation arguably provides a better view of a
company’s free cash flow than does its reported operating profit.
6 September 2011
Source: Company reports, SBB Research
Figure 4. Chinese steel mill EBITDA / PBT comparison 2008-2010
EBITDA PBT EBITDA PBT EBITDA PBT EBITDA PBT
Wugang 17.3% 8.7% 11.9% 3.6% 11.2% 2.3% -35.3% -73.9%
Hegang 8.4% 4.3% 6.2% 1.3% 6.1% 1.4% -27.3% -66.6%
Angang 14.3% 4.8% 12.4% 1.2% 12.3% 2.6% -13.5% -47.0%
Chonggang 12.4% 3.7% 6.1% 1.0% 3.9% 0.1% -68.4% -97.7%
Baosteel 15.1% 4.1% 13.8% 4.9% 14.7% 8.4% -2.3% 107.5%
Average 13.5% 5.1% 10.1% 2.4% 9.7% 3.0% -28.4% -42.0%
Change 2010 / 20082008 2009 2010
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
3Q2009 4Q2009 1Q2010 2Q2010 3Q2010 4Q2010 1Q2011 2Q2011
Source: Reuters, SBB Research
Figure 3. Baosteel’s profitability after tax falls to 2-year low
SBBAnalyticsChina
Subscriber Edition 25 October 2010
© Steel Business Briefing 2011 www.sbb.com Page 5
Chinese mills have large gap between EBITDA and operating profit
Rising raw material costs, sales prices constrained by overcapacity, and lower
levels of exports have all reduced the profitability of Chinese steel mills over
the last three years. Our analysis suggests that the average EBITDA margin of
five major listed Chinese mills dropped by 28% over the period 2008-2010,
while the average profit margin before tax (PBT) fell by 42%. Mills such as
Baoshan Iron & Steel (Baosteel) and Wuhan Iron & Steel (Wugang), which
produce higher-value products, not surprisingly post higher EBITDA and PBT
margins than the other major Chinese mills we looked at.
Rising steel demand in China over the last decade led to a huge investment in
new crude and rolling capacity and an increase in the assets on steel mills’
balance sheets. Over the period 2008-2010 the average depreciation of the
five major mills we analyzed, excluding Baosteel, increased by 55%, as the
new assets on these companies balance sheets were brought into operation.
Smaller increases in depreciation for other Asian mills
Compared with the average Chinese mill, other major Asian steel mills saw
much smaller increases in depreciation charges. During the period 2008-2010,
depreciation for POSCO, South Korea’s largest steel mill, increased by just
over 20%, while that for Tata’s Indian steel operations increased by just 4%,
suggesting that the assets on their balance sheets grew at a slower pace over
the period than did Chinese mills (see Figure 5).
Asian steel mills outside China generally have higher EBITDA and PBT
margins than Chinese mills (Figure 6, next page). These margins also
remained more stable over the period 2008—2010, when Chinese mills saw
falling margins This is in part due to the very different operating conditions
outside China.
For example, Tata’s Indian steel operations have access to a captive supply of
high quality domestic iron ore and are able to exercise considerable pricing
power over the domestic market, especially for higher value products. Tata
also adds value via a network of five processing units across the country.
Subscriber Edition 2 November 2010 Subscriber Edition 16 November 2010 Subscriber Edition 13 January 2011 6 September 2011
Figure 5. Depreciation levels (indexed) rising fastest at ex-Baosteel mills
Source: Company reports, SBB Research
80
100
120
140
160
2008 2009 2010
TATA
POSCO
Baosteel
China ex-Baosteel
SBBAnalyticsChina
Subscriber Edition 25 October 2010
© Steel Business Briefing 2011 www.sbb.com Page 6
Meanwhile, POSCO produces predominantly high value-added flat products
such as cold-rolled auto sheet. The only comparable Chinese mill is Baosteel,
which even though it enjoys the highest EBITDA margin of all major listed
Chinese mills is still considerably less profitable than POSCO, which had an
EBITDA margin of 22.6% last year.
Somewhat ironically, East Asian mills such as POSCO were able to maintain
their high margins throughout the global financial crisis in large part thanks to
surging demand from China. Although Chinese mills have been moving to
producing higher value-added products, the country still remains dependent on
imports of high-quality sheet and other specialist steels. Last year, over 70% of
China’s steel imports came from Japan and Korea.
We note that differences in accounting rules and conventions vary from
country to country and this may mean that these profit margins are not directly
comparable. Nevertheless we feel confident about the trends revealed by this
analysis. Perhaps more importantly, the financial statements for the Chinese
mills are generally consolidated and include revenues from non-steel
businesses, whereas we have analyzed the non-consolidated steel businesses
for the Indian, Japanese and Korean mills.
Assets on Baosteel’s balance sheet shrunk 2008—2010
Figure 7 (next page) shows depreciation as a percentage of EBITDA (D%
EBITDA) for five major listed Chinese mills. Annual depreciation rose at a
faster rate than EBITDA at mills such as Hegang, Wugang, and Angang,
causing D%EBITDA over the period 2008-2010 to rise. D%EBITDA for all mills
spiked in 2009, due both to sharply decreased profits from the financial crisis
and rising depreciation. It fell back again somewhat in 2010 on higher mill
profits, but still settled at significantly higher levels than in 2008 for most mills.
Meanwhile, D%EBITDA for Baosteel fell over the same period, mainly due to
the fact that Baosteel’s net assets on the balance sheet fell with a
corresponding decline in depreciation. At the same time, Baosteel’s EBITDA
fell by 32% in 2009 and rose by 36% in 2010, resulting in D%EBITDA falling
from 64% in 2009 to 44% in 2010.
Subscriber Edition 2 November 2010 Subscriber Edition 16 November 2010 Subscriber Edition 13 January 2011 6 September 2011
2008 2009 2010
EBITDA PBT EBITDA PBT EBITDA PBT
TATA* 38.8% 28.1% 39.2% 28.8% 41.6% 33.3%
SAIL 21.8% 19.5% 26.2% 23.4% 20.8% 15.4%
POSCO 27.6% 19.0% 19.3% 13.3% 22.6% 15.8%
JFE 14.6% 8.5% 11.9% 2.5% 11.9% 3.6%
Average 25.7% 18.8% 24.2% 17.0% 24.2% 17.0%
Source: Company reports, SBB Research. * Indian steel company only
Figure 6. Asian steel mill EBITDA / PBT comparison 2008-2010
SBBAnalyticsChina
Subscriber Edition 25 October 2010
© Steel Business Briefing 2011 www.sbb.com Page 7
Conclusions
Once deprecation is removed, the free cash flow of many Chinese mills, as
represented by EBITDA, appears significantly improved as shown in Figure 4.
Although financing on any loans taken out to purchase assets will have to be
paid for out of a mill’s EBITDA, many Chinese steel mills’ free cash flows are
much better than their operating margin would suggest.
.
Subscriber Edition 2 November 2010 16 November 2010 6 September 2011
Source: Company reports, SBB Research
Figure 7. Share of depreciation in EBIDTA of five Chinese mills
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2008 2009 2010
Wugang Hegang Angang Chongang Baosteel
What is the company?
Xinxing Ductile Iron Pipe (Xinxing) is a publicly listed
state-owned ductile iron pipe and integrated steelworks
located in Wu’an city in northern Hebei province.
What does it produce?
Despite its name, Xinxing produces many more products
than simply ductile iron pipes, of which it produces
around 1.5m t/y. The mill also produces around 5m t/y of
finished steel products including rebar, wire rod, alloy
special steel and steel-plastic composite pipes.
Why is it interesting?
China’s ductile iron pipe market is fairly small with
demand of around 3m t/y, of which has around 50%
market share. Ductile iron pipes, given their high
strength and natural corrosion resistance, are used for
underground water and gas pipe networks. The mill has
benefited greatly in recent years from China’s booming
construction and infrastructure projects.
Xinxing has not limited itself to just ductile iron pipe
production. The mill also produces a number of other
steel and alloy high-pressure pipes for conveying oil,
communications equipment, natural gas, chemicals and
other materials.
Xinxing recently announced a joint venture project with
Sichuan-based Sanzhou Special Pipe (Sanzhou) to
develop high-quality U-shaped steam tubes for use in
nuclear power plants. However, the nuclear power
disaster in Japan earlier this year has cast some doubts
on the plan, as China’s government has announced a
temporary moratorium on new nuclear power plants and
those projects may proceed more slowly in the coming
years.
In an effort to decrease costs incurred from high raw
materials prices, Xinxing has begun searching for new
sources of iron ore. The mill signed an agreement with a
local prefecture in Hubei province last year to develop a
new iron ore mine with 5m t/y output. The Fe content of
the mine is quite high at 30-47%, however the ore’s high
phosphorus content will require additional processing.
Xinxing has also signed a number of agreements with
Xinjiang to develop new mines in the region.
In Profile
Xinxing Ductile Iron Pipe 新兴铸管股份有限公司
For more information visit http://www.xinxing-pipes.com
A brief history of Xinxing
2008
2011
SBBAnalyticsChina
Xinxing starts its first wire rod mill
with 700/000 t/y capacity.
The mill also signed agreements with
local governments in Hubei and
Xinjiang to develop new iron ore
resources in their respective regions.
Xinxing signed an agreement with
Sanzhou to develop high quality U-
shaped steam tubes for use in nu-
clear power plants.
The mill also signed its 3rd agree-
ment with Xinjiang to develop new
iron ore resources in the region.
Xinxing opened a rebar mill at its
subsidiary in Wuhu, Anhui province.
The mill is expected to have 1m t/y of
capacity when fully operational.
Xinxing also signed a JV agreement
with Xinjiang International Industry to
open a new steelworks in Jinte,
Xinjiang.
2010
Ductile iron pipe casting at Xinxing
© Steel Business Briefing 2011 www.sbb.com Page 8
6 September 2011
YES, I’m a paying SBB news subscriber and qualify for a $500 discount -$500 / -₤250 / -€370 / -RMB3,800 I’d like to become an SBB news subscriber – please contact me Standard subscription 12 months, single reader $3499 / ₤1749 / €2589 / RMB26,799 Premium subscription 12 months, single reader $5499 / ₤2749 / €4059 / RMB41,699 Please contact me about multi-reader licences
China Top 100 Mills wall map with iron ore reserves (incl. postage) $415 /£210 / €310/ RMB3010 x___ copies China Steel Mills Directory – 400 mills, searchable and online $1999 / ₤1110 / €1370 / RMB13999
Total
www.steelbb.com
SBB Analytics CHINA order form
Complete your details Name Company Postal address Email Tel Fax
Optional Extras
SBB is raising the data quality in China to new levels! “ ”
Premium subscribers also have full historical access to monthly data and reports back to July 04, including recent Automotive, Shipbuilding, Construction & White Goods special features.
A must weekly read for anyone doing business in, sourcing from, or analysing China
SBB Analytics CHINA is our acclaimed weekly report, giving unique and essential, quality insight into the world’s largest market.
• Examination and implication of the key events each week
• Import, export & domestic market analysis and forecasting
• Macro-economic and governmental policy affecting steel
• Steel mill & end user sector profiles Plus all the latest statistical data
SUBSCRIBERS
SAVE $500
SUBSCRIBERS
SAVE $500
SUBSCRIBERS
SAVE $500
Premium subscription also includes the Analytics CHINA Datafile: detailed monthly production, import & export statistics by product, value and origin / destination for carbon, stainless and raw materials, available as an excel sheet for easy manipulation.
Introductory Offer
$300 / ₤150 / €200 / ¥2,299 discount before 30 June
Order your subscription today! Fax to your nearest SBB Office nb: available in PDF format only
Please complete payment details I have enclosed my cheque for (amount)________ payable to Steel Business Briefing Ltd Please post to: Steel Business Briefing Peek House, 20 Eastcheap London EC3M 1EB, United Kingdom
Please send an invoice to my company for: (amount)
Please debit my credit/charge card: Credit card payments taken in £GBP equivalent Card Holder’s Name: _______________________________________ Card No: CSV:
Expiry date: ________ / ________
Card Holder’s Signature:
London +44 207 929 4666 USA +1 412 431 4371 Shanghai +86 21 5110 5480 Brazil +55 11 3371 5750
For any questions please contact Shanghai Purple [email protected] +86 (0)21 5110 5483 Singapore Vannie [email protected] +65 6227 7811 London Laura [email protected] +44 (0)207 626 0600 Pittsburgh Maria [email protected] +1 412 431 4370 Sao Paulo Giselle [email protected] +55 (0)11 3371 5755 Bursa Saniye [email protected] +90 224 211 1814-15
Datafile