theology cannon
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
1/36
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
2/36
Inspiration
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
3/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Inspiration
American Heritage Dictionary:
1. Stimulation of the mind or emotions to
a high level of feeling or activity.2. An agency, such as a person or work
of art, that moves the intellect oremotions or prompts action or
invention.3. Something, such as a sudden creative
act or idea, that is inspired.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
4/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Inspiration
4. The quality of inspiring orexalting: a painting full ofinspiration.
5. Divine guidance or influenceexerted directly on the mind andsoul of humankind.
6. The act of drawing in, especiallythe inhalation of air into the lungs.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
5/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Inspiration
Sine qua non
of evangelical theology
The watershed issue ofcontemporaryevangelism
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
6/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Inspiration
2 Tim. 3:16-17
All Scripture is inspiredby God and profitablefor teaching, for reproof, for correction, for
training in righteousness; so that the man ofGod may be adequate, equipped for everygood work.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
7/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Inspiration
qeo,pneustoj =
qeo,j (theos) pneustoj (pneustos)
Lit. God breathed
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
8/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Inspiration
2 Pet. 1:20-21
But know this first of all, that no
prophecy of Scripture is a matterofone's own interpretation, for noprophecy was ever made by an act
of human will, but men moved bythe Holy Spirit spoke from God.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
9/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Inspiration
Wrong Interpretation Correct Interpretation
Refers to the
interpretation of the
revelation to the readers
so that they might read
the Scriptures correctly.
Refers to the
interpretation of the
revelation to the author
so that he might write
the Scriptures correctly.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
10/36
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
11/36
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
12/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Theories of Inspiration
Partial: Some of Scripture isinspired, not all. Namely, that which
is profitable for doctrine, matters offaith and practice. Matters of
history and science are notincluded because they areirrelevant to Gods purpose. (50%
Man, 50% God)
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
13/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Theories of Inspiration
Degree: All Scripture is inspired, but someare more inspired than others. (90 %God, 10% Man). The days of creation
narrative was written in accommodatinglanguage, a sort of baby-talk (AlisterMcGrath, Christian Theology, 211).
Verbal, Plenary: All Scripture is inspiredby God who utilized the human elementwithin man to accomplish this withouterror. (100% Man, 100% God)
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
14/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Where Does InspirationLie?
1. Mind of God?
2. Mind of the Author?
3. Written Words?4. Message?
5. Message Proclaimed?
6. Message Received?
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
15/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
1. God
3. Mind
of the
Author
4. Written Words5. Message
6. Message Proclaimed
7. Message Received
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
16/36
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
17/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Inspiration
Definition: The supernatural act inwhich God guided the writers of
Scripture giving them His words allthe while utilizing the human elementwithin man to produce the Scriptureswithout error.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
18/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Inspiration
Inspiration is . . .
Verbal: Extends to the very words of
Scripture, not just teachings.Plenary: Extends to everything in the
Bible, not just parts that speak on
matters of faith and practice.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
19/36
Inerrancy
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
20/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Inerrancy
Definition: The doctrinal teachingthat the Scripture in the autographa
(original manuscript) is true in all thatit teaches.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
21/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Inerrancy
Deductive Defense:
Premise 1: God is truthful and thereforebeyond error (2 Sam 7:28; Titus 1:2;Heb 6:18).
Premise 2: God is the author of Scripture(2 Tim 3:16; 2 Pet 1:20-21).
Conclusion: Scripture is truthful andtherefore beyond error.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
22/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection # 1 (deductive)
To err is human
Premise 1: Human beings err.
Premise 2: The Bible is a humanbook.
Conclusion: The Bible errs.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
23/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection #1 (deductive)
Response
Premise 1: Human beings err.
Premise 2: Christ is a human being.Conclusion: Christ errs.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
24/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection #1 (deductive)
The fallacy of this argument lies inpremise that to err is human.
1. Human beings musterr.
2. Human being canerr.
Error is not a foregone necessity ofhumanity.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
25/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection #1 (deductive)
Christ
100% human 100% God
Scripture100% human 100% God
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
26/36
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
27/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection # 2 (inductive)
Alleged Error #1
2 Sam. 10:18 vs. 1 Chron. 19:18
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
28/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection # 2 (inductive)
2 Samuel 10:18
But the Arameans fled
fled before Israel, and
David killed 700charioteers of the
Arameans and 40,000
40,000 horsemen and
struck down Shobach
the commander of their
their army, and he died
died there.
1 Chronicles 19:18
The Arameans fled
before Israel, and David
David killed of theArameans 7,000
charioteers and 40,000
40,000 foot soldiers,
and put to death
Shophach the
commander of the army.
army.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
29/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection # 2 (inductive)
Alleged Error #1 Solution:
Error in transcription
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
30/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection # 2 (inductive)
Alleged Error #2Matt. 28:2, Mark 16:5 vs. John 20:12, Luke 24:4
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
31/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection # 2 (inductive)
Mark 16:5 Entering
Entering the tomb,
tomb, they saw a
young man sitting
at the right, wearing
wearing a white
robe; and they werewere amazed
John 20:12
And she saw two
angels in whitesitting, one at the
head and one at the
the feet, where the
the body of Jesushad been lying.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
32/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection # 2 (inductive)
Alleged Error #2 Solution:
Faulty Assumption
If there were two angels, there wasalso one. No contradiction ispresent. There is no rule that the
Gospel writer cannot differ in whatthey choose to include.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
33/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection # 2 (inductive)
Alleged Error #3Matt 26:34, 74-75; Mark 14:30, 72
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
34/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection # 2 (inductive)
Matthew 26:34
Jesus said to him,
"Truly I say to youthat this very night,
night, before a
rooster crows, you
you will deny Methree times."
Mark 14:30
And Jesus said to
him, "Truly I say toto you, that this
very night, before a
a rooster crows
twice, you yourselfyourself will deny
Me three times.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
35/36
Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe
Objection # 2 (inductive)
Alleged Error #3 Solution:
Faulty Assumption
One writer can be more detailedthan another.
-
8/2/2019 Theology Cannon
36/36
Prof Lakshman Madurasinghe
Inerrancy
Facts about inerrancy:1. The Bible does speak in accommodating
language (e.g. The sun went down).2. The Bible does use round numbers (7000
killed, instead of 6899).3. The Bible does use free quotations (Old
Testament in the New).4. The Bible does summarize (Sermon on the
Mount is longer in Mathew than in Luke).5. Consideration must be made of the genera
of the individual books (Proverbs 22:6).