theoretical perspectives 2

24
THEORY & PRACTICE IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION TOPIC: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE MODELS OF ORGANIZATION PRESENTED BY: LOUIE A. MEDINACELI

Upload: louie-medinaceli

Post on 20-Dec-2014

369 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Theoretical perspectives 2

THEORY & PRACTICE IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

TOPIC: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE

MODELS OF ORGANIZATION

PRESENTED BY: LOUIE A. MEDINACELI

Page 2: Theoretical perspectives 2

A theory . . .A theory . . .

consists of a set of concepts and the

relationships that tie them together into a

coherent explanation or understanding of

the phenomenon of interest

Page 3: Theoretical perspectives 2

EconomicsEngineering

SociologyPolitical Science

Biology-EcologySocial Psychology

Cultural AnthropologyFolklore Studies

Semiotics and HermeneuticsLinguistics

Postmodern ArchitecturePoststructural Philosophy

Literary Theory

PREHISTORY1900-1950’s

MODERN1960’s & 70’s

SYMBOLIC-INTERPRETIVE

1980’s

POSTMODERN1990’s

Smith (1776)Marx (1867)

Durkheim(1893)Taylor (1911)Follett (1918)Fayol (1919)Weber (1924)Gulick (1937)

Barnard (1938)

Von Bertalanffy (1950)Trist & Bamforth (1951)

Boulding (1956)March &Simon (1958)

Emery (1960)Burns & Stalker (1961)

Woodward (1965)Lawrence & Lorsch (1967)

Thompson (1967)

Schutz (1932)Whyte (1943)

Selznick (1949)Goffman (1959)Gadamer (1960)

Berger & Luckmann (1966)Weick (1969)Geertz (1973)

Clifford & Marcus (1986)

Saussure (1959)Foucault (1972)

Bell (1973)Jencks (1977)Derrida (1978)Lyotard (1979)Rorty (1980)

Lash & Urry (1987)Baudrillard (1988)

Fig 1.1Fig 1.1 Sources of inspiration for organization theory Sources of inspiration for organization theory

Cultural Studies

Page 4: Theoretical perspectives 2

TheoreticalTheoretical PerspectivesPerspectives

Theories linked by similar underlying assumptions, logics, and vocabularies.

Research adopting similar approaches, methods, and ways of theorizing.

Page 5: Theoretical perspectives 2

Theory(built from a selected set of concepts to explain, understand, criticize or create the

phenomenon of interest)

Concepts(categories for sorting, organizing, storing information, formed from common

features of specific instances)

Phenomena of Interest(what is to be explained, understood, criticized or created by the theory)

abstraction

analysis and

association

Page 6: Theoretical perspectives 2

AbstractionAbstraction

The process of removing the unique details of

particular examples so that only their common

aspects remain.

Enables us to process and communicate more

information.

Page 7: Theoretical perspectives 2

Plant

Reptile

Fido Spot

Dog

Phydough Spought

Cat

Mammal Bird

Animal

All Living Things

Abstract

Concrete

Page 8: Theoretical perspectives 2

ParadigmsParadigms

A set of assumptions and practices that define a scientific discipline (Kuhn).

A way of seeing and thinking about the world.

Page 9: Theoretical perspectives 2

Why Multiple Perspectives?Why Multiple Perspectives?

1. Help better understand and manage the complexity of organizations.

2. Become more aware of the assumptions underlying theory and practice and the reasons for doing or not doing things.

3. Form a basis for determining pressures to act and their relationship to ethical, efficient, and socially responsible action.

Page 10: Theoretical perspectives 2

Ontology concerns our assumptions about reality and agency

- is there an objective reality out there or is it subjective, existing only in our minds?

- are our actions predetermined or do we have freewill?

OntologyOntology

Page 11: Theoretical perspectives 2

EpistemologyEpistemology

Epistemology is concerned with knowledge:

- how we generate knowledge

- what constitutes ‘good’ knowledge

- how we represent or describe reality

Page 12: Theoretical perspectives 2

Comparing OntologiesComparing Ontologies

Objectivism – the belief in an objective, external reality that exists

independently of our knowledge of it.

Subjectivism – the belief that knowledge of the world is subjective and

that social reality only exists when we experience it and give it

meaning.

Page 13: Theoretical perspectives 2

ComparingComparing EpistemologiesEpistemologies

Positivism – we can discover Truth through the scientific measurement and validation of behavior & systems.

Interpretivism – all knowledge is relative to the knower & can only be understood from the point of view of individuals who are directly involved; truth is socially constructed.

Page 14: Theoretical perspectives 2

Modernist PerspectiveModernist Perspective

• Objectivist ontology

• Positivist epistemology

• Organizations are real, rational entities and systems

• Organization theorists focus on finding universal laws governing system behavior, rational structures, & standardized procedures

Page 15: Theoretical perspectives 2

Symbolic-Interpretive Symbolic-Interpretive PerspectivePerspective

• Subjectivist ontology

• Interpretivist epistemology

• Organizations are communities, socially constructed in everyday interactions

• Organization theorists study how people create and give meaning to their experience of organizational life

Page 16: Theoretical perspectives 2

Postmodern PerspectivePostmodern Perspective

• Ontology - the social world is created through language & discourse

• Epistemology - there is no Truth; knowledge & power are interwoven

• Organizations are texts - sites of power relations, marginalization, and play

• Organization theorists deconstruct & destabilize ideologies & rational forms of organizing; encourage a reflexive questioning of taken for granted assumptions & practices

Page 17: Theoretical perspectives 2

Poststructuralist IdeasPoststructuralist Ideas

Page 18: Theoretical perspectives 2

Fig. 1.2 A Conceptual Model Of Organization.A Conceptual Model Of Organization.

Technology

Culture

SocialStructure

PhysicalStructure

Page 19: Theoretical perspectives 2

Models of Organization

Page 20: Theoretical perspectives 2

• I. The "Rational" or Formal Model (Metaphor: Machine, Army) • A. The rationality here is instrumental rationality. • 1. Reason seeks to adopt means solely in terms of the

efficiency in promoting the end.2. Ends are set outside the organization (profits, the market demand for a certain line of products)

• B. The organization is likened to a machine. The individual is treated as a cog in the machine.

• C. Other • 1. The organization has the formal pyramidal structure--

Commands move down, information moves up.2. Individuals are glued to the organization through contracts.

• D. Problems and paradoxes • 1. Voluntariness of the contract is contradicted by the lack of

autonomy of a cog2. Alienation of labor, job dissatisfaction, etc.

Page 21: Theoretical perspectives 2

• II. The "Political" or "Factional" Model • A. The "rationality" is the "tit for tat" model of Polemarchus in Plato's

Republic • 1. We should help our friends and harm our enemies.

2. We may manipulate ("use") those who are not our friends for the sake of our faction.3. The end is the increased power and satisfaction of one's faction.

• B. The organization is conceived as a field of coalitions competing for scarce resources, power, etc.

• C. Ethics is concerned with stating limits on permissible manipulation of others:

• 1. The principle of promoting the total good.2. The principle of respecting the rights of others.3. The principle of treating others in accord with distributive justice.

Page 22: Theoretical perspectives 2

• III. The Caring Model (Metaphor: Family) • A. The guiding principle is appropriate care: • 1. Care focuses on particular persons.

2. Care is undertaken as an end in itself.3. Care involves individuals engrossed in caring for other particular individuals.4. Care is growth-enhancing.

• B. The organization is conceived as a network of connected selves.

• C. Potential problems • 1. Excessive caring: invasion of privacy, favoritism

(injustice)2. Insufficient caring

Page 23: Theoretical perspectives 2

• IV. The Civic Model. Metaphor: New England Town Meeting • A. At the heart of the civic model is deliberative rationality • 1. Goal is the common good

2. Fundamental equality and mutual respect among participants.3. We can deliberate about what makes up the common good and about what promotes it, but not about whether we should promote the common good.4. Good action is valuable in itself as well as in its results. (Undercuts alienation.)

• B. Employees are to corporation as good citizen is to the community. • C. Ethical considerations • 1. Works best with long-term employees.

2. Great salary differentials between co-deliberators must be avoided.3. Requires high level of integrity (good character) among the co-deliberators4. Not all employees will be co-deliberators; one must still treat them with appropriate respect, caring, etc.5. The pursuit of the organizational common good must be compatible with the common good of the larger community, with justice, and with respect for rights of those outside the organization.

Page 24: Theoretical perspectives 2

When a man works he works. But when a man prays, GOD works.

Commit to the LORD whatever you do, and your plans will succeed - Proverbs 16:3

DECISION-MAKING: Trust in the LORD with all our heart and do not depend on your own understanding; in all your ways acknowledge Him and he will crown your efforts with success- Proverbs 3:5-6

Thank you and God bless.