MRCD-Parsons 99 Inc Property

Theresa F.R. Teuma 2009 Trust Parcelin City of Petaluma, Sonoma CountyDan McElhinneyChief Deputy District DirectorCaltrans District 41

LOCATION MAPProject Location2Old Redwood Highway Interchange

OLD REDWOOD HwyROUTE 101NTo Santa RosaTo San FranciscoProject Location3

Old Redwood HwyPetaluma Blvd NorthTeuma PropertyPetalumaPepper Rd Stony Point RdROUTE 101To Santa RosaTo San Francisco

N

Proposed Project 4Route 101Old Redwood HighwayNB Off-RampTeuma PropertyTo Santa RosaTo San FranciscoNB Loop On-RampExisting Right-of-WayExisting R/WProposed Right-of-WayProposed Northbound On-RampNB On-RampProposedR/WExisting R/W

NExisting Driveway

Proposed Project 5NB On-RampOld Redwood Highway101 CasinoQuality InnShowcase of MotorcarsTeuma PropertyProposed Fee Acquisition - 0.49 AcresProposed TCE - 0.04 acresProposed State R/W

N

Proposed Project 6NB On-RampOld Redwood Highway101 CasinoQuality InnShowcase of MotorcarsTeuma PropertyWidth Within State R/W Available for Proposed Drainage Systems/DitchesExisting State R/WProposed State R/WProposed Retaining Wall

NProposed Unpaved SlopesConcrete Barrier7

Aerial view of Teuma PropertyTeuma PropertyTo San FranciscoTo Santa RosaRoute 101Old Redwood Highway7

8View From Southbound Route 101 Towards Theresa F.R. Teuma 2009 Trust ParcelView from Southbound Route 101 towards Teuma Property

Teuma Property

9View from Northbound Off-Ramp Towards Teuma PropertyNOld Redwood HighwayTeuma PropertyNB Off-RampRelated to the findings of the Commission:That the project is planned or located in a manner that will be mostcompatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.10THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

The Departments project should be designedto avoid loss of visibility to this parcel

THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

The Departments project should be designedto avoid loss of visibility to this parcel

The Departments design minimizes impacts to the property.Abutters rights were acquired in 1955.Assertions on loss of visibility are compensation issues and would be addressed in court proceedings.11Related to the findings of the Commission:That the project is planned or located in a manner that will be mostcompatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.12THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Owner would like an on-premise sign to mitigate the loss of visibility.

Related to the findings of the Commission:That the project is planned or located in a manner that will be mostcompatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Owner would like an on-premise sign to mitigate the loss of visibility.

City of Petaluma sign ordinance, Section 20.150 prohibits installation of new signs.A variance to the sign ordinance would need to be requested by the property owner and approved by City Council.

13Related to the findings of the Commission:That the project is planned or located in a manner that will be mostcompatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.14THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Insufficient area for parking and emergency vehicle access on remainder.

Related to the findings of the Commission:That the project is planned or located in a manner that will be mostcompatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Insufficient area for parking and emergency vehicle access on remainder.

Parking loss was included in the offer of just compensation.The City of Petaluma Fire Marshall reviewed and approved the proposed right of way adjacent to the existing building. The issues raised by the property owner relate only to compensation, and would be addressed in eminent domain proceedings.

15Related to the findings of the Commission:That the project is planned or located in a manner that will be mostcompatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.SummaryThe public interest and necessity require the proposed project.This project is planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.The property sought to be condemned is necessary for the proposed project.An offer of just compensation has been made in accordance with G.C. 7267.2.16

Proposed Project 17NB On-RampNotes:Teuma PropertyProposed State R/WExisting State R/WNB Loop On-RampProposed 5-ft Wide Temporary Construction Easement (See Note 1)(1) Proposed 5-ft wide temporary construction easement is required for installation of the 6-ft high chain link fence and gates along the State right of wayWidth Within State R/W Available for Proposed Drainage Systems/Ditches and Maintenance Access (See Note 2)(2) Width available within State right of way between toe of slope and 6-ft high chain link fence installed along proposed State right of way is as narrow as 10-ft at some locations. This width is intended for use for underground drainage systems, surface drainage ditches and maintenance accessDrainage DitchUnderground Drainage System

Proposed Project 18NB On-RampProposed State R/WExisting State R/WNB Loop On-RampProposed 5-ft Wide Temporary Construction EasementWidth Within State R/W Available for Proposed Drainage Systems/Ditches and Maintenance AccessTeuma PropertyDrainage Ditch

Northbound On-Ramp Geometry Study19Route 101NB On-RampOld Redwood HighwayNB Off-Ramp101 CasinoMidasQuality InnShowcase of MotorcarsExisting Parcel Right-of-WayTeuma PropertyProposed State Right-of-WayTo Santa RosaTo San FranciscoNB Loop On-RampExisting State R/WProposed State R/WV=50 MPHV=20 MPHV=25 MPHNorthbound On-Ramp Geometry StudyExisting Showcase of Motorcars BuildingProposed Retaining WallMidas DrivewayEnd of State Access ControlALTERNATIVE NOT RECOMMENDEDThis alternate alignment was studied at the request of the property owner.Extract from City of Petaluma Sign Ordinance20

Proposed State Right of Way Adjacent to Existing Showcase of Motorcars Building21

32ft. +/-32ft. +/-18ft. +/-15ft. +/-Showcase of Motorcars21