thermal noise in nonlinear devices and circuits wolfgang mathis and jan bremer institute of...
TRANSCRIPT
Thermal Noise in Nonlinear Devices and Circuits
Wolfgang Mathis and Jan Bremer
Institute of Theoretical Electrical Engineering (TET)
Faculty of Electrical Engineering und Computer ScienceUniversity of Hannover
Germany
Content
1. Deterministic Circuit Descriptions
2. Stochastic Circuit Descriptions
3. Mesoscopic Approaches
4. Steps in Noise Analysis in Design Automation
5. Bifurcation in Deterministic Circuits
6. Bifurcation in Noisy Circuits and Systems
7. Examples
8. Conclusions
1. Deterministic Circuit Descriptions
2. Stochastic Circuit Descriptions
3. Mesoscopic Approaches
4. Steps in Noise Analysis in Design Automation
5. Bifurcation in Deterministic Circuits
6. Bifurcation in Noisy Circuits and Systems
7. Examples
8. Noise Analysis of Phase Locked Loops (PLL)
9. Conclusions
1. Deterministic Circuit Descriptions
A. Meissner, 1913
Bob Pease, National Semiconductors
Real Circuit
Modelling
Circuit-Model
Models for Electronic Circuits
Partitioning b
b
Electrical and Electronic Circuits: The Ohm-Kirchhoff-Approach
b
b
Electrical Circuits are defined in
1 1,..., ; ,.( , ..) : ,( )bb
bbi ii uu u Z := R R
Space of all currents and Voltages
O
( , ) ( , ) 0, : ;b b b b kR Ri u F i u F k b O := R R R R R
Description of resistive NW elements:
Ohm Space
K
Description of connections:
( , ) 0 0, ( , ) exaktb bi u Ai B u A B K := R R
Kirchhoff Space
S :=K OState-Space
of Electrical Circuits
S
0 ( , )g x y
( , )dx
f x ydt
DAE System:
Differential-
algebraic System
DAE Systems consist of manye.g. (100-) thousand Equations
numerical solutions necessary!
Dynamics electronic Circuits (Networks)
Special Cases: State-Space Equations (ODEs) ( )dx
F xdt
Capacitors Inductors
D e t e r m i n i s t i c D e s c r i p t i o n : O D E s
d x
d tF xi
i ( )
w h e r e
: ( 1 , , )n niF i n a n d x R R R
00 )(, xtx
00 )( xtx
Are initial value problems suitable for studying the qualitative behavior?
Deterministic Description: ODEs
Initial value problems suitablefor studying
the quantitative behavior!
Reformulation of the deterministic Dynamics
Qualitative behavior: Considering a whole family of systems
IRStxxxFdt
dxi
i )(),( 00
( )p x
where
generalized Liouville equation
( , ) ( ( ))tp x t p xP
1
ni
i i
p Fp
t x
Dynamics of a Density Function p (Frobenius-Perron-Operator ):tP
Set of Initial Values
Density Function p
Thermal Noise in linear and nonlinear electrical Circuitswith noise sources
Noise Model
2. Stochastic Circuit Descriptions
Microscopic
Approach
DeviceModelling
Circuits
Network Thermodynamics
Deterministic Approach
Circuit Equations
GeneralizedLiouville Equation
Generalization: (Non)linear Circuits including noise
DeterministicCircuits
MacroscopicApproach
NoisyCircuits
MesoscopicApproaches
Microscopic Approach: Statistical Physics
drift movemente.g.Recombination-
Generation-Noise
Multi-Body System (approx. 1023 particles)
C. Jungemann (see his talk this morning)
Noisesources
as inputs
D y n a m ic s o f t h e D e n s i t y F u n c t io n p : ( m a th e m a t ic a l e q u iv a le n t to S O D E )
2 2
1 , 1
( ) 1 ( )
2
n ni
i i ji i j
p Fp p
t x x x
F o k k e r - P la n c k e q u a t io n
3. Mesoscopic Approaches
Remarks: Fokker-Planck equation as modified generalized Liouville equation
Stochastic ODE (SODE):
( ) ( )ii i
dxF x x
dt
: ( 1, , ) andn niF i n x R R R
white noise and ( ) coupling coefficienti x
The Langevin Approach:
Deterministic Circuit
(without inputs)
Langevin’s Approach:
Noisy input output
Applications: e.g in Communication Systems
Transmission of noisy signals through a deterministic channel
(Mathematics: Transformation of stochastic processes)
iij j
ji
dxA x
dt
Physical Interpretation of SODE (Langevin, 1908)
a) Linear Case
iij j
j
dxA x
dt
( white noise, konst.)i
Average:ii
ij j ij jj
ij
i
d xdxA x A x
dt dt
=0
stoch.
Conclusion: First Moment satisfies a determinstic differential equation
( )ii i
dxF x
dt
b) Nonlinear Case ( white noise, konst.)i
( )ii
dxF x
dt stoch.
Average: ( ) ( )iij i j i
d xdxF x F x
dt dt
=0
( )jF x Coupling ofMoments
(van Kampen, 1961)
Compare: In nonlinear systems
Deterministic nonlinear System:
Energetic Coupling of Frequencies
Sinusoidal input
Coupling of
Moments
of the probility density
Stochastic nonlinear System:
Alternative: Analyzing nonlinear circuits including noise
Numerous papers
Methods:
• Calculation of desired spectra
• Numerical Methods in Stochastic Differential Equations
• Geometric Analysis of Stochastic Differential Equations
Extraction of Noise Sources (then using the Langevin approach)
1. Motivation 5
Stochastic Equation
dw)II2(qdt1kT
quexpIduC ss
Average: (first moment)
2
2
s ukT
q
2
1u
kT
qIu
dt
dC
Thermodynamic Equilibrium:
Fluctuations-Voltage-Converter
However: Brillouin‘s Paradoxon of nonlinear electrical Circuits
Contradiction against the second law of thermodynamics
(white noise sources in device models are forbidden: …., Weiss, Mathis, Coram, Wyatt (MIT))
PN-Diode
White noise
:
„A diode can rectifyits own noise“
White noise
Electrical current is related to noisy electron transport
internal noise (cannot switched off)
in nonlinear systems (electrical circuits) Drift Movement
phys.
No systematic extraction of deterministic equations
The entire behavior has to be described as a stochastic process
Assumption: description as a Markov process
Nonlinear Electronic Circuits
Mesoscopic Approach based on statistical thermodynamics
“First Principle” Mesoscopic Approach for Circuits with Internal Noise
Starting Point: Markovian Stochastic Processes are defined by the Chapman-Kolmogorov Equation (Integral equation for the transition probability density)
),( tx
Types of Markov Processes
time domain probability density domain
Stochastic differential Equation (SODE)
Fokker-Planck equation
mathematical equivalent!
more general partial differentialequations for the
probability density domain
General solutions of the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation by the Kramers-Moyal series
Derivation of the Kramers-Moyal Coefficients for nonlinear systems by Nonlinear Nonequilibrium Statistical Thermodynamics (Stratonovich):
„Thermal noise“:
In thermodynamical equilibrium
( )
the equilibrium density function is known:
However: Restricted to reciprocal circuits (no transistors!)
„Irreversible Statistical Thermodynamics of Circuits“
Weiss; Mathis (1995-2001), Dissertation (Weiss) 1999
kT
W
eq
X
ep
(stable)
Perturbation analysis for calculating coefficients
Kramers-Moyal Equation
)t,X(p)X(KXX!m
)1(
t
)t,X(pm1
m1 m11m
mm
?
Circuit Equations )kT(o)X(KXdt
d
Thermodynamic Equilibrium )kT/Wexp()X(p Xeq
Detailed Balance (Reciprocity)
Nonlinear „distributed“ Generalization
of the Nyquist’s Formula
Statistical Thermodynamics of Thermal Noise in Nonlinear Circuit Theory
Using Stratonovich‘s Approach: Basic is the Markov Assumption
determination
3.1 Anwendung: Vollständige nichtlineare Netzwerke
Network Equations
U
)U,I(M
dt
dU)U(C
I
)U,I(M
dt
dI)I(L
- Reciprocal
- DAE Description (Index 1)
Mixed Potential M: Dissipation
M(I,U) = F(I) - G(U) + (I,U)
Complete Reciprocal Circuits: Brayton-Moser Description
Nonlinear Circuits (Weiss und Mathis (1995-1999))
Starting Point:
Y)0(X ,
F o k k e r -P la n c k E q u a t io n : „ D is t r ib u te d N o is e “
)U,I(P)U,I(
t
)U,I(p1
21 1
21
L
)0(F ,
21
2
1
II 21
2111
1
IL
U
12
2111
1
UC
I
1
21
C
)0(G ,
2
1
UU
S ig n a l
21
kT21
21
LL
)0(F ,
21211
kTII
2
21
21
CC
)0(G ,
21UU
2
)U,I(p N o is e
S D E „D if fe re n t ia l“ N y q u is t F o rm u la
,dU
)0(dIkT2S I dI
)0(dUkT2S U
N o is e S o u r c e
Linear Approximation: , (0)X Y
, ,(0) 1/ 2 (0)X Y Y Y Quadratic Approximation:Quadratische Approximation:
YY)0(2/1Y)0(X ,,
3. Anwendung auf Schaltungen und Bauelemente 13
Kramers-Moyal Equation: „Distributed Noise“
)U,I(t
)U,I(p1
321 1
321
L
)0(F
2
1 ,
1I
321 1
321
32 C
)0(GII ,
1U
32UU
+ kT
21 21
221
LL
)0(F,
1I
+ kT
21 21
221
CC
)0(G,
1U
321 21
321
LL
)0(FkT3
,
21II
2
321 21
321
3 CC
)0(GkTI ,
21UU
2
3U
321 3121
321
LLL
)0(F)kT(2
,2
1 2 3
3
I I I
)t,U(p
there is no equivalent Noise Source Model
3
22not of
Fokker-Planck type
Cubic Approximation: , , ,
1 1(0) (0) (0)
2 6X Y Y Y Y Y Y
)U,I(P)U,I()U,I(
t
)U,I(p21
2
1321 31
3321
432
14321 4321 1
4321
432
11
4321 IILL
)0(FkT3UUU
UC
)0(GIII
IL
)0(F
6
1 ,,,
4321 21
2
1321 31
3321
LL
kT
12
1U
UCC
)0(GkT3 ,
4321 ,c
4
43
214321 L
kTII
II)0(F2
2
,
4321 21CC
kT
12
143,21
c
4
43
21
3321 C
kTUU
UU)0(G2
2
,
)0(F4LLL
)kT(4321
4321 321
,
2
413242314321 ,,, ccc
44
4
321IL2
kTI
III
3
)0(G4CCC
)kT(3321
4321 321
,
2
413242314321 ,,, ccc )U,I(p
UC2
kTU
UUU44
4
321
3
R a u s c h e n t h e r m o d y n a m i s c h n i c h t v o l l s t ä n d i g b e s t i m m b a rNoise cannot be determined thermodynamical!
Our Approach of Noise Spectra Calculations
StratonovichMachine
Current-VoltageRelation
Circuit Topology
PhysicalAssumptions
Correct NoiseSpectra
(if the physicalassumptions valid)
Note: Assumptions are not satisfied if non-thermal effects are included (hot electron effects)
The “Thermodynamic Window”of a Circuit
Currents and Voltages
Microscopic Behavior
Stochastic Diff.Equ. ( Noise Source )
duC )u(K dt IS dw
Signal Noise
Fokker-Planck Equation ( distributed Noise )
t
)t,U(pC
)U(KU
21
)t,U(p 2I
2
2
C
S
U
)t,U(p
Network Equation K(U) = - U / R
Thermodynamic Equilibrium )kT/Wexp()U(p Ceq
Linear RC Networks: Classical Result
Nyquist‘s Formular (linear approximation)
)/1(2 RGkTGSI
our approach
equivalent SODE
Dissipation Fluctuation
3 . 2 N i c h t l i n e a r e s R C N e t z w e r k : L i n e a r - q u a d r a t i s c h e N ä h e r u n g
N e t w o r k O D E 22
2
UdU
)0(gd
2
1U
dU
)0(dg
dt
dUC
S O D E dwudu
)0(gd
2
1
du
)0(dgkT2dt
C
kTu
du
)0(gd
2
1u
du
)0(dgduC 2
22
2
2
C/kTu 2 t h a t i s S h o r t C i r c u i t
G e n e r a l i z e d N y q u i s t F o r m u l a
U
dU
)0(gd
2
1
dU
)0(dgkT2S
2
2
I
Some Results: Nonlinear RC Network (Linear-quadratic Approximation)
our approach(equivalent SODE)
22
T
s
T
s
Ts U
U
I
2
1U
U
I1
U
UexpI)U(g
U
U
I
2
1
U
IkT2S 2
T
s
T
sI )U(IqIq2 s )U(O 2
Results about Thermal +Noise in Semiconductor Devices (Weiss, Mathis: IEEE Electron Devices Letters 1999)
1. Schottky Diode
Shot Noise!
Note: Shot noise has a thermal background (see Schottky (1918))
our approach
MOSFET:
IS
DStGS U
2
1UUkT2
tGS
DS
2tGS
2DS
tGS
DS
tGStherm,I
UU
U
2
11
UU
U
3
1
UU
U1
UUkT2S
DStGS U
2
1UUkT2 2
DSUO
2. MOSFET
2( )DSO UthermIS
known from microscopic analysis (see textbooks):our approach
2DSDStGSD U
2
1UUUI
known from
(simple model)
JFET:
IS
0GSdiff
DS
0
GSdiff0
UUU4
U
U
UU1gkT2
,yx
3
2yx
yx2
1yx
3
4yx
gkT2S2/32/3
222/32/3
0therm,I
0
GSdiff
0
DSGSdiff
U
UUy,
U
UUUx
therm,IS
0GSdiff
DS
0
GSdiff0
UUU4
U
U
UU1gkT2 )U(O 2
DS
3. JFET
2( )DSO UthermIS
known from microscopic analysis (e.g. van der Ziel (1962):
2/1
0
2/3GSdiff
2/3DSGSdiff
DS0DU
UUUUU
3
2UgI
our approach
4. Steps of Noise Analysis in Design Automation
• First Generation: LTI-Noise Models Linear Noise Analysis based on Schottky-Johnson-Nyquist (Rohrer, Meyer, Nagel: 1971 - …)
Small-signal noise models do not work if e.g. bias changes occur,oscillators, more general nonlinear circuits
Idea: „Linearization with respect to an operational point (constant solution)“
State Space
• Second Generation: LPTV Models Variational Linear Noise Analysis of Periodical Systems (Hull, Meyer (1993), Hajimiri, Lee (1998))
Useful for periodic driven systems, however heuristic assumptionsand concept will be needed for oscillators (Leeson‘s formula)
Idea: „Linearization with respect to a periodic solution“
State Space
• Third Generation: SDAE Models Noise Analysis by Stochastic Differential Algebraic Equations (Kärtner (1990), Demir, Roychowdhury (2000))
0 ( , )g x y
( , )dx
f x ydt
DAE System:
Differential-
algebraic System
+ Noise (stochastic processes)
Systematic Results in Phase Jitter of Oscillators as well asother nonlinear systems (e.g. PLL),however the onset of oscillations cannot described
)()()()( txfxgdt
dxxB
Given: , Cgs, Cds, RL, y22; Choice: CG, CL (influence of Cgs and Cds „small“)
fosz
L
Cgs//CG Cds//CL
RLgm
Linearization?
What is happened if the circuit is non-hyperbolic?
x
x
x
CI0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
The dynamical behavior of state space equations is related to the dynamics of the „linearized“ equationsin hyperbolic cases.
Theorem of Hartman-Grobman:
FET Colpitts Oscillator
5. Bifurcation in Deterministic Circuits
Non-reciprocal
Barkhausen or Nyquist Criteria
In certain cases Limit Cycles can be observed
damping term
Example: Sinusoidal Oscillators
( ) x x x x x 2 2 1 0
Obvious solution: x t t or x t t( ) cos ( ( ) sin )
positive
State space interpretation:
x
x
Type of damping
2 2( 1) 0x x
Periodic Solution
negative
Idea: (Poincaré; Mandelstam, Papalexi - 1931)
Embedding of an oscillator (equation) into a parametrized family of oscillator (equations)
( ) x x x x x 2 2 0embedding
with
( ) x x x x x 2 2 1 0
Example: Van der Pol equation
Analysis of Systems with Limit Cycles
Cut
planeCut
plane
BifurcationPoint
Andronov-Hopf Bifurcation
Stable equilibriumpoint
Limit Cycle
State Space
x
x
Poincaré-Andronov-Hopf Theorem (1934,1944)
( , ), : n nx f x f R R RLet
with f ( , )0 0 for all in a neighborhood of 0. If
• the Jacobi matrix includes a pair of
imaginary eigenvalues • the other eigenvalues have a negative real part •
D fx ( , )0 0 1 2, j
d
d 1 0 0( )
• the equilibrium point for asymptotic stable 0
Then there exist
• an asymptotic stable equilibrium point for • a stable limit cycle for
( , ) 1 0( , )0 2
Transient Behavior of a Sinusoidal Oscillator(Center Manifold Mc)
Concept for Analysis of Practical Oscillators
• Transformation of the linear part: Jordan Normal Form
• Transformation of the Equations: Center Manifold
• Transformation of the reduced Equations: Poincaré-Normal Form
• Averaging
( , ), : n nx f x f IR IR IR
Symbolic Analysis(MATHEMATICA, MAPLE)
6. Bifurcation in Noisy Circuits and Systems
Different Concepts:
I) The physical (phenomenological) approach (e.g. van Kampen)
Behavior of P.D.F. p neara stable equilibrium point
initialP.D.F.
initialP.D.F.
Behavior of P.D.F. p neara unstable equilibrium point?
Special Case: Dynamics in a Potential U(x)
U(x) U(x)
?
Dynamical Equation:'( )
dxU x
dt
Fokker-Planck
2
2'( )
p pU x p
t x x
42
2 0 uni
0 bi
moda
moda( )
l
lx
x
statp x C e
stationary
( )2
2
!)0 '( ) (
U x
stat
pU x p p x C e
x x
42 0 single we
e.g. l
( )2 >0 double we
l
ll
xU x x
3t t t tdx x x dt dW
SODE
For the equilibrium P.D.F. p(x) changes its type0
It is called P-bifurcation (e.g. L. Arnold)
Obvious disadvantage: (Zeeman, 1988)“It seems a pity to have to represent a dynamical system by y static picture”*
* Arnold, p. 473 ** Arnold, p. 473
II) The mathematical approach (e.g. L. Arnold)
Observation:**
One-one correspondence: stationary P.D.F. and invariant measures (I.M.)
Consider more general invariant measures (if exist)
D(ynamical)-Bifurcation Point of a family of stochastic dynamics with a ergodic I.M. ( . . . )w r t R
D
“Near” we have another I.M. with D
D
Question: Is there any relationship between these types of bifurcation
In general, there is not!
Our example: (above)
The corresponding invariant measure to
is unique*
42
2 0 uni
0 bi
moda
moda( )
l
lx
x
statp x C e
There is noD-Bifurcation
Remark: There are cases with D-bifurcation but no P-bifurcation*
* Arnold, p. 476
Case 1: Pitchfork Bifurcation
3t t t t tdx x x dt x dW
D P
0D 2
2P
Invariant Measures
0
q
q
q
q
Case 2: Andronov Bifurcation
3 21 1
0 0 1 0 0
1 0t t t tdx dt x dt x dWx x x
D1 P
1D 0P
D2
2D
0 stable
invariantmeasures
0
1
saddle
stable
0
1
2
unstable
stable
saddle
Main Questions: There are stochastic generalizations of geometric theorems
• Hartman-Grobman
• Poincaré-Andronov-Hopf
• Center Manifold
• Poincarè Normal Form
Global H-G: Wanner, 1995 (local H-G: still open question) Arnold, Schenk-Hoppe Namachchivaya 1996
Boxler 1989, Arnold, Kadei 1993
Elphick et al. 1985, C.+G. Nicolis 1986 (physics)Namachchivaya et al. 1991 Arnold, Kedai 1993, 1995Arnold, Imkeller 1997
Remark: Until now a research program (Arnold, ...)
Meissner oscillator and van der Pol’s equation
Meissner‘s Tube Oscillator
BEu
2
2 2 20 1 2 3 02
0
2 3 0BE BEBE BE BE
d u duRM k k u k u u
dt L dt
1 2 3, ,k k k
R
C
0 ,L M
20
0
1
L C
7. Examples
Normalization and Scaling:
1 12 2 2 2 20 0 1 0 2 1 2 0 3 1 22 2
0
0 10
2 3
x xdR
Mk k Mx x k Mx xx xdtL
1 2( , )BE BEx u x u
1 1
22 2 1 2
000 1 0
1 0 t
x xd dt
x x xx
xdW
2 20 1 0 3
0
where
:= , : Wiener p3 1, rocesst
RMk k M
LW
Noisy frequency:20 2:white noise( ) and 0k
(using results from Arnold, Imkeller 1997)
Linearization:
1 1
2 2
0 1 0 0
1 0 t
x xd dt x dW
x x
Center Manifold: 2 20If 0 ! , < 4 : / 4d R
2-dim. Center space and no stable space
Normal Form in Resonant Case: (polar coordinates)
Solution of stochastic cohomology equation results(see approach: Arnold, Imkeller, 1997)
BEu1 2 3, ,k k k
RC
0 ,L M
20
0 0
1
L C
2
2 3 20 1
32 3 02
0
2 3 0BBE BE
BE BE BE E
d u R duM k k u k u u
dt L dtu
Meissner oscillator with nonlinear capacitor
Duffing-van der Pol equation
q
Normal Form in Resonant Case: (polar coordinates)
Solution of stochastic cohomology equation results(results: Arnold, Imkeller, 1997)
2 23 2 2
2
5 212 4 sin 2 sin 4 cos 2
2 2 8t t t
t t t t d t t t t td d d
r r rd r r r dt r r dW
2 2 2 22
2 2
3 5 36 3 11 1 cos 2 cos 4 sin 2
4 2 2 2 2t t t t
t d t t t t td d d d d d
r r r rd r dt dW
1 1
3 22 2 1 1 2
00 1 0 0
1 0 t
x xd dt x dW
x x x x x
noisycase
Pardoux-Wihstutzformula
1988
2
41,2 2
,2 8 d
O
determinsticAndronov-Hopf
bifurcation0
0
0
2 1
0
0, 0 0,
first stochasticD-Andronov-Hopf
bifurcation
Stability is lost
Ljapunov-Exponents:
0 stochastic
P- Andronov-Hopfbifurcation
0
8. Noise Analysis of Phase Locked Loops (PLL)
Equivalent Base-band Modell:
F(s)+ KA sin(.)
0
t
d
0
( )sintd d
K A f t ddt dt
sin ,d d
K A tdt dt
State Space Equation
( )t
ˆ t
t( )x t
( )e tF(s)=1
F(s)P
VCO
Phase Detector Lowpass Filter
Voltage Controlled Oscillator
( )s t
( )r t
2nd order PLL with ideal Integrator
1
1
2 sin
sin
n
dx
d
d x
d
Equivalent Base-band Modell
System State Space Equation:
Noisy state equation
Formally, one obtains:
But:
How do we interpret this equation, if n’(t) is not exactly known?
- need generic results
noise
Noisy state equation
Necessary Assumption:
PLL-bandwidth is small compared with BW of the noise-process
- sufficient to model n’(t) as white noise again
- rewrite state equation as SDE
Normalized SDE
After time-normalization and introducing parameters from linear PLL noise theory, one obtains:
Interpretation:
• SDE in the Stratonovich sense
• dw() = (t)d: increment of a normalized Wiener process
• BL: loop noise bandwidth, : frequency offset between input and VCO output, : SNR in the loop
The Euler-Maruyama scheme (1)
• based on Ito-Taylor expansion ) consistent with Ito-calculus
• Ito stochastic integrals ) evaluate Riemann sum approximation at lower endpoint
Consider the scalar Ito-SDE
And the corresponding Euler-Maruyama scheme
The Euler-Maruyama scheme
Consistency with Ito-calculus
Noise term in the EM scheme approximates the Ito stochastic integral over interval [tn, tn+1] by evaluating its integrand at the lower end point of this interval, that is
Phase-acquisition time
• Time to reach locked state from an initial state
Transient PDF – Lock-in
Meantime between cycle slips
Simulation approach
• numerically solve the SDE using the Euler-Maruyama scheme
• estimate probabilities using relative frequencies
• verify the accuracy with the results from the Fokker-Planck method
• a relative tolerance level of 5% was allowed
Still no simulation required more than 5 minutes on a standard PC
9. Conclusions
• Determinstic and stochastic behavior are related in time domain and density function domain
• Physical description of noise with a nonlinear Langevin equation fails with respect to its physical interpretation
• For thermal noise in nonlinear reciprocal circuits a well-defined theory is available (L.E. as approx.)
• For nonhyperbolic circuits (e.g. oscillators) first concepts for a geometric theory is available
• There is a difference between P- and D-Bifurcation
• Stochastic D-Andronov-Hopf theorem is illustrated by means of versions of a Meissner oscillator circuit
10. References
• B. Beute, W. Mathis, V. Markovic: Noise Simulation of Linear Active Circuits by Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Theoretical Electrical Engineering (ISTET), 6 - 9 July 2003, Warsaw, Poland
• Mathis, W.; M. Prochaska: Deterministic and Stochastic Andronov-Hopf Bifurcation in Nonlinear Electronic Oscillations, Proceedings of the 11th workshop on Nonlinear Dynamics of Electronic Systems (EDES), 161- 164, 18-22 May 2003, Scuols, Schweiz
• W. Mathis: Nonlinear Stochastic Circuits and Systems – A Geometric Approach. Proc. 4th MATHMOD, 5-7 Februar 2003, Wien (Österreich)
• L. Weiss: Rauschen in nichtlinearen elektronischen Schaltungen und Bauelementen - ein thermodynamischer Zugang. Berlin; Offenbach: VDE Verlag, 1999. Also: Ph.D. thesis, Fakultät Elektrotechnik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, 1999.
• L. Weiss, W. Mathis: A thermodynamic noise model for nonlinear resistors, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 402-404, Aug. 1999.
• L. Weiss, W. Mathis: A unified description of thermal noise and shot noise in nonlinear resistors (invited paper), UPoN'99, Adelaide, Australia, July 11-15, 1999.
• L. Weiss, D. Abbott, B. R. Davis: 2-stage RC ladder: solution of a noise paradox, UPoN'99, Adelaide, Australia, July 11-15, 1999.
• W. Mathis, L. Weiss: Physical aspects of the theory of noise of nonlinear networks, IMACS/CSCC'99, Athens, Greece, July 4-8, 1999.
• W. Mathis, L. Weiss: Noise equivalent circuit for nonlinear resistors, Proc. ISCAS'99, vol. V of VI, pp. 314-317, Orlando, Florida, USA, May 30 - June 2, 1999.
• L. Weiss, W. Mathis: Thermal noise in nonlinear electrical networks with applications to nonlinear device models, Proc. IC-SPETO'99, pp. 221-224, Gliwice, Poland, May 19-22, 1999.
• L. Weiss, W. Mathis: Irreversible Thermodynamics and Thermal Noise of Nonlinear Networks, Int. J. for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering COMPEL, vol. 17, no. 5/6, pp. 635- 648, 1998.
• W. Mathis, L. Weiss: Noise Analysis of Nonlinear Electrical Circuits and Devices. K. Antreich, R. Bulirsch, A. Gilg, P. Rentrop (Eds.): Modling, Simulation and Optimization of Integrated Circuits. International Series of Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 146, pp. 269-282, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2003
TET References:
• L. Weiss, M.H.L. Kouwenhoven, A.H.M van Roermund, W. Mathis: On the Noise Behavior of a Diode, Proc. Nolta'98, vol. 1 of 3, pp. 347-350, Crans-Montana, Switzerland, Sept. 14-17, 1998.
• L. Weiss, W. Mathis: N-Port Reciprocity and Irreversible Thermodynamics, Proc. ISCAS'98, vol. 3 of 6, pp. 407-410, Monterey, California, USA, May 31 - June 03, 1998. *
• L. Weiss, W. Mathis, L. Trajkovic: A Generalization of Brayton-Moser's Mixed Potential Function, IEEE CAS I, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 423-427, April 1998.
• L. Weiss, W. Mathis: A Thermodynamical Approach to Noise in Nonlinear Networks, International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 147-165, March/April 1998.
Further references:
• Langevin, P., Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. (Paris) 146, 1908, 530• W. Schottky, W.: Über spontane Stromschwankungen in verschiedenen Elektrizitätsleitern, Ann. d. Phys. 57, 1918,
541-567• J. Guckenheimer; P. Holmes: Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcation of vector fields. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg 1983• N.G. van Kampen: Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. North Holland, Amsterdam 1992• R.L. Stratonovich.: Nonlinear Thermodynamics I. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1992• L. Arnold: The unfoldings of dynamics in stochastic analysis. Comput. Appl. Math. 16, 1997, 3-25• W. Mathis: Historical remarks to the history of electrical oscillators (invited). In: Proc. MTNS-98 Symposium, July
1998, IL POLIGRAFO, Padova 1998, 309-312.• L. Arnold; P. Imkeller: Normal forms for stochastic differential equations. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 110, 1998,
559-588• L. Arnold: Random dynamical systems. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1998• W. Mathis: Transformation and Equivalence. In: W.-K. Chen (Ed.): The Circuits and Filters Handbook. CRC Press &
IEEE Press, Boca Raton 2003