thermodynamics of hydrochloric acid in water-2-ethoxyethanol...

4
Indian Journal of Chemistry Vol. 22A, November 1983, pp. 928-931 Thermodynamics of Hydrochloric Acid in Water-2-Ethoxyethanol Mixtures A A EI-HARAKANY·, H SADEK & A S EI-LABOUDY Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt Received 7 April 1982; revised 21 March 1983; re-reoised and accepted II July 1983 The standard thermodynamic functions of transfer (.1.G~,.1.H~and .1.S~) of one mol of HCI in its standard state from water to water-z-ethoxyethanol mixtures have been calculated from the determination of the standard electrode potentials of the cell: Pt, Hig)/HCI (m), S(x), H 2 0 (lOO-x), AgCl/Ag at different temperatures. The variation of the standard electrode potential of Ag/AgCI electrode with dielectric constant of the medium has been also studied. It has already been shown that in the protolytic process 1 involving the transfer of one mole of HCI in its standard state from aqueous to another amphiprotic solvent (SH), partition equilibrium shown below is set up, H30+ +SH~H20+SH~ As long as water content is high enough, H 30 + is the dominant species. However, in the mixed solvent there will be a competition between water and the organic solvent for solvating the proton. In the present study, we have used 2-ethoxyethanol as the organic solvent for studying the thermodynamics of transfer of HCI from water to water-organic solvent mixture. 2-Ethoxyethanol was used as the solvent, because it proved to be a good solvent in the determination of the stability constants of some metal ion complexes, their apparent molal volumes ' and solubilities 3. However, there are no potentiometric data available in the literature for mixtures of this solvent with water. Values of the standard potentials of the Ag/AgCI electrode in pure water and in water-Z-ethoxyethanol solvent mixtures at different temperatures were determined and employed for the calculation of the thermodynamic functions of the transfer process. The thermodynamic functions in turn are very useful for the study of ion-solvent and solvent-solvent interactions. Materials and Methods 2-Ethoxyethanol (BOH) was purified as described earlier". Ag/AgCI electrode was prepared according to Carmody's procedure". The hydrogen electrodes were prepared by the method of Hills and Ives". A Pye potentiometer (model 7565) accurate to 0.1 mV, an electrometer type 602, and a cell similar to that constructed by Harned and Morrison 7 were used for the measurements of the emf. 928 The dielectric constants and densities of the various compositions of water-2-ethoxyethanol mixtures at different temperatures were determined by using a WTW dipole meter type OMOI, and a pyknometer (20ml capacity) respectively. Freshly prepared doubly distilled water was used for the calibrations of both. The results are shown in Tables I and 2. Values of the computed Debye-Huckel constants A and B are also included in Table 2. Values of the vapour pressures of the mixed solvents were taken as those of the corresponding compositions of water-z-methoxy- ethanol system", since both the organic solvents have nearly equal boiling points. Results and Discussion The standard potential of Ag/AgCI electrode Values of the measured electrode potentials at various temperatures and different compositions of the solvent mixtures are presented in Table 3. The standard electrode potentials of Ag/AgCI electrode on Table I-Absolute Densities of 2-Ethollyethanol- Water Mixtures at Different Temperatures [2-Ethoxy- Mol. Absolute density at (0C) ethanol] fro (wt %) (XI) 25 30 35 40 45 0.00 O.()()()() 0.9970 0.9956 0.9940 0.9922 0.9901 9.28 0.0200 0.9971 0.9952 0.9932 0.9910 0.9887 18.67 0.0439 0.9978 0.9953 0.9930 0.9905 0.9879 27.90 0.0718 0.9986 0.9956 0.9927 0.9894 0.9861 37.42 0.1068 0.9969 0.9933 0.9898 0.9861 0.9824 43.82 0.1349 0.9926 0.9886 0.9847 0.9805 0.9765 56.88 0.2087 0.9853 0.9809 0.9769 0.9724 0.9680 67.01 0.2888 0.9751 0.9707 0.9664 0.9618 0.9575 69.77 0.3157 0.9718 79.81 0.4414 0.9585 89.58 0.6322 0.9435 100.00 l.()()()() 0.9252

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jan-2021

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Indian Journal of ChemistryVol. 22A, November 1983, pp. 928-931

    Thermodynamics of Hydrochloric Acid in Water-2-Ethoxyethanol Mixtures

    A A EI-HARAKANY·, H SADEK & A S EI-LABOUDY

    Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

    Received 7 April 1982; revised 21 March 1983; re-reoised and accepted II July 1983

    The standard thermodynamic functions of transfer (.1.G~,.1.H~and .1.S~)of one mol of HCI in its standard state from waterto water-z-ethoxyethanol mixtures have been calculated from the determination of the standard electrode potentials of the cell:

    Pt, Hig)/HCI (m), S(x), H20 (lOO-x),AgCl/Agat different temperatures. The variation of the standard electrode potential of Ag/AgCI electrode with dielectric constant of themedium has been also studied.

    It has already been shown that in the protolytic process 1involving the transfer of one mole of HCI in itsstandard state from aqueous to another amphiproticsolvent (SH), partition equilibrium shown below is setup,

    H30+ +SH~H20+SH~

    As long as water content is high enough, H 30 + is thedominant species. However, in the mixed solvent therewill be a competition between water and the organicsolvent for solvating the proton. In the present study,we have used 2-ethoxyethanol as the organic solventfor studying the thermodynamics of transfer of HCIfrom water to water-organic solvent mixture.

    2-Ethoxyethanol was used as the solvent, because itproved to be a good solvent in the determination of thestability constants of some metal ion complexes, theirapparent molal volumes ' and solubilities 3. However,there are no potentiometric data available in theliterature for mixtures of this solvent with water.

    Values of the standard potentials of the Ag/AgCIelectrode in pure water and in water-Z-ethoxyethanolsolvent mixtures at different temperatures weredetermined and employed for the calculation of thethermodynamic functions of the transfer process. Thethermodynamic functions in turn are very useful forthe study of ion-solvent and solvent-solventinteractions.

    Materials and Methods2-Ethoxyethanol (BOH) was purified as described

    earlier". Ag/AgCI electrode was prepared according toCarmody's procedure". The hydrogen electrodes wereprepared by the method of Hills and Ives". A Pyepotentiometer (model 7565) accurate to 0.1 mV, anelectrometer type 602, and a cell similar to thatconstructed by Harned and Morrison 7 were used forthe measurements of the emf.

    928

    The dielectric constants and densities of the variouscompositions of water-2-ethoxyethanol mixtures atdifferent temperatures were determined by using aWTW dipole meter type OMOI, and a pyknometer(20ml capacity) respectively. Freshly prepared doublydistilled water was used for the calibrations of both.The results are shown in Tables I and 2. Values of thecomputed Debye-Huckel constants A and B are alsoincluded in Table 2. Values of the vapour pressures ofthe mixed solvents were taken as those of thecorresponding compositions of water-z-methoxy-ethanol system", since both the organic solvents havenearly equal boiling points.

    Results and DiscussionThe standard potential of Ag/AgCI electrode

    Values of the measured electrode potentials atvarious temperatures and different compositions ofthe solvent mixtures are presented in Table 3. Thestandard electrode potentials of Ag/AgCI electrode on

    Table I-Absolute Densities of 2-Ethollyethanol- WaterMixtures at Different Temperatures

    [2-Ethoxy- Mol. Absolute density at (0C)ethanol] fro(wt %) (XI) 25 30 35 40 45

    0.00 O.()()()() 0.9970 0.9956 0.9940 0.9922 0.99019.28 0.0200 0.9971 0.9952 0.9932 0.9910 0.9887

    18.67 0.0439 0.9978 0.9953 0.9930 0.9905 0.987927.90 0.0718 0.9986 0.9956 0.9927 0.9894 0.986137.42 0.1068 0.9969 0.9933 0.9898 0.9861 0.982443.82 0.1349 0.9926 0.9886 0.9847 0.9805 0.976556.88 0.2087 0.9853 0.9809 0.9769 0.9724 0.968067.01 0.2888 0.9751 0.9707 0.9664 0.9618 0.957569.77 0.3157 0.971879.81 0.4414 0.958589.58 0.6322 0.9435

    100.00 l.()()()() 0.9252

  • EL-HARAKANY et al.: THERMODYNAMICS OF HCI IN WATER-ETHOXYETHANOL MIXTURES

    Table 2- Values of Dielectric Constant and Debye-Hiickel Constants A and B for 2-Ethoxyethanol-Water Mixtures atDifferent Temperatures

    % Composition (2-ethoxyethanol)

    0.00 9.82 18.54 27.87 37.26 47.02 56.70 66.88

    25°C

    D 78.32 73.91 65.22 62.55 56.09 48.02 41.10 33.41A 0.5117 0.5845 0.6734 0.7170 0.8443 1.0659 1.3461 1.8367

    lO-BB 0.3292 0.3389 0.3607 0.3684 0.3890 0.4204 0.4544 0.5040

    30°C

    D 76.80 71.76 64.17 60.75 54.19 46.57 39.95 32.41A 0.5140 0.5691 0.6730 0.7306 0.8672 1.0885 1.3700 }.8749

    lO-BB 0.3297 0.3411 0.3607 0.3707 0.3925 0.4234 0.4571 0.5075

    35°C

    D 75.21 69.61 63.12 58.95 52.29 45.12 38.80 31.41A 0.5175 0.5812 0.6731 0.7458 0.8927 1.1138 1.3967 1.9175

    10-BB 0.3304 0.3435 0.3607 0.3732 0.3963 0.4266 0.4600 0.5113

    40°C

    D 73.80 67.46 62.07 57.15 50.39 43.67 37.65 30.41A 0.5197 0.5947 0.6738 0.7627 0.9212 1.1418 1.4263 1.9648

    10-BB 0.3309 0.3461 0.3608 0.3760 0.4004 0.4302 0.4633 0.5155

    45°C

    D 71.75 65.31 61.02 55.35 48.49 42.22 36.50 29.41A 0.5294 0.6096 0.6750 0.7814 0.9529 1.1729 1.4591 2.0174

    lO-BB 0.3329 0.3490 0.3610 0.3791 0.4050 0.4340 0.4668 0.5200

    the molal scale (E':,J were evaluated by applying theequation",

    EO' E 2 K I 2KA Jm 2 K I= + og m - - og1 - s« Jm

    (1 +0.002 Mxym) =E~ - 2Kp'm ... (1)

    where, E is the corrected emf, a" is the apparent ionicsize parameter which is given the values 3-7A, A and Bare the Debye-Huckel constants. The term 2K log (1+0.002 Mxym) is usually small in the studiedconcentration range of HCI (0.05-0.01 m) and isneglected'!" -13). B'm is introduced to account for thechange produced in the dielectric constant by theaddition of electrolyte 14-18. The plots of F' againstmolality of HCI at each temperature, solventcomposition, and ion size parameter always yieldstraight lines which on extrapolation to infinitedilution give" the values of E~ (standard deviation ofintercept ranged from 0.003 to 0.005). It is also foundthat E~ is independent of the chosen value of a", andthe term 2Kf3'm is too small to affect the E~ value.

    The slopes of the lines obtained on plotting F'against m are then plotted against the chosen values ofthe ion size parameter, in order to estimate a' valuewhich corresponds to zero slope for each temperaturein each solvent composition. These results are shownin Table 4.

    By applying the least squares method, the variationsof both E~ and E'{. (in the mole fraction scale)19 asfunctions of temperature in all solvent mixtures areeasily computed and represented in the form ofequations (a-h):(a) 0.0%, E~ = 0.2226 -639 x 10-6(t-25)

    - 2.3 x 10-6(t - 25)2E~ = 0.01624-1333 x 1O-6(t-25)

    - 2.9 x 10-6(t - 25)2(b) 9.32%, E~=0.2153-641 x 1O-6(t-25)

    - 4.2 x 10 -6(t - 25)2E~=O.01292-1321 x 1O-6(t-25)

    -4.2 x 1O-6(t-25)2(c) 18.54%, E~=0.2061-430xlO-6(t-25)

    -12.0 x 10-6(t-25)2E~ = 0.0080 - 1093 x 10 -6(t - 25)

    -12.1 x 1O-6(t-25)2(d) 27.87%, E~=0.1984-656 x 1O-6(t-25)

    - 5.6 x 10-6(t - 25)2E~ = 0.00501-1303 x 10 -6(t-25)

    -5.8 x 1O-6(t-25)2(e) 37.26%, E~=O.l912-878xlO-6(t-25)

    -3.6 x 10-6(t-25)2E~ = 0.00304 -1508 x 10-;;(t - 25)

    - 3.8 x 10-6(t -- 25)2(f) 47.02%, E~=0.1817-962x 1O-6(t-25)

    -7.2 x 10-6(t - 25)2E~ = - 0.00443 - 766 x 10-6(t - 25)

    - 39.6 x 10 -6(t - 25)2

    929

  • INDIAN J. CHEM .• VOL. 22A. NOVEMBER 1983

    Table3-The Potential of the Cell Pt.H2 (I atm)/HCI(m).ECS (x~.,)/AgCI. Ag

    0.050330.040110.030110.020080.01001

    0.050320.040300.030280.020010.01001

    0.050410.040150.030100.020080.01010

    0.050190.040390.030290.020110.01011

    0.050720.040630.030360.020160.01014

    0.051650.042100.029410.020940.01028

    0.051930.041700.031100.020720.01047

    25

    E (corrected to I atm) in volts at ("q

    45

    0.378450.389500.403350.423250.45730

    0.372700.382700.396100.415850.44910

    0.365700.376400.3899(\0.408950.44180

    0.359900.370000.383450.402900.43545

    0.352450.362600.376600.395200.42770

    0.340450.350700.366700.382600.41525

    0.325750.334700.348050.364700.39590

    30 35x=9.3% ECS

    0.37866 0.378650.39001 0.389550.40396 0.403650.42401 0.424050.45841 0.45875

    x=18.54% ECS0.37295 0.371950.38305 0.382650.39690 0.396600.41725 0.417100.45120 0.45190

    x=27.87% ECS0.36540 0.365590.37620 0.376240.38950 0.390040.40935 0.409390.44240 0.44339

    x=37.26% ECS.0.35845 0.357240.36885 0.367740.38265 0.381840.40180 0.401590.43515 0.43549

    x=47.02% ECS0.35060 0.349330.36085 0.359130.37520 0.373530.39335 0.393230.42685 0.42603

    x = 56.70% ECS0.33779 0.335320.34789 0.344520.36454 0.362120.38069 0.378370.41384 0.41197

    x=66.88% ECS0.32239 0.318820.33144 0.328020.34514 0.341820.36194 0.359020.39249 0.38907

    ECS = 2-Ethoxyethano1

    40

    0.378110.389660.403510.424060.45946

    0.371750.382550.396750.417150.45220

    0.363850.374800.389050.409050.44370

    0.356740.367140.380890.400790.43474

    0.347080.357080.371580.390730.42418

    0.332570.342370.359470.375770.41007

    0.314960.324360.338310.355660.38720

    0.377490.388990.403290.424190.46009

    0.370920.381920.396420.417120.45292

    0.363050.374200.388500.408650.44335

    0.354890.365140.379590.399490.43406

    0.344560.355210.369260.389260.42376

    0.329550.338950.356350.372900.40775

    0.310880.320430.334030.351830.38293

    (g) 56.70%. E~ = 0.1673 -1228 X 10 -6(t-25)- 2.4 x 10-6(t - 25)2

    E~= -0.0080-1813 x 1O-6(t-25)- 2.6 X 10-6(t - 25)2

    (h) 66.88%. E~ = 0.1439 - 1673 x 10-6(t - 25)+ 4.4 x 10-6(t - 25)2

    E~ = -0.0231-2233 x 1O-6(t-25)+4.2 x 10-6(t - 25)2

    930

    Table 4- Values of a" at Different 2-Ethoxyethanol (ECS)Compositions and Temperatures

    ECS(wt %)

    0.009.32

    18.5427.8737.2647.0256.7066.88

    253.26.63.74.55.56.06.45.6

    453.74.84.84.14.96.76.14.8

    303.26.04.44.55.66.66.35.0

    353.94.85.13.66.36.45.94.8

    403.64.64.34.74.86.56.55.0

    ·Limit of error in a" values is within the first decimal place

    Standard electrode potential of Ag] AgClelectrode and dielectric constant

    Fig. 1 shows the plot of E~ against the reciprocal ofthe dielectric constant of 2-ethoxyethanol-watermixtures at 25°C, where departure from the theoreticalBorn line20 is observed. This behaviour was also foundin the case of water-methanol+' and water-methylcellosolve/? systems, and it was attributed inpart to the uncertainty in the radii of the solvated ions,which are expected to vary in the various solvents andthus invalidate the basis of a linear relationship.

    Thermodynamic functions of transferUsing the values of the standard electrode potentials

    in pure water and water-Z-ethoxyethanol mixtures atdifferent temperatures, the change in the standardthermodynamic functions of the transfer of one moleof HCl from water to the mixed solvent can beobtained from the relations 19

    AG~ = -F('E~ - wE~AS~ = -(dAG~/dT)

    ... (2)

    ... (3)

    and,AH~ = AG~ + TAS~ ... (4)Table 5 illustrates the values of these thermodynamicfunctions at 25°C and 35°C. It should be noted that thevalues of AS~ in Table 5 are derived by applying theleast squares method to relation 3. The temperaturesused in the calculation were 25°, 30°, 35°,40° and 45°Cfor each of the studied solvent mixture. Accordingly,

    0·22

    ':.,E0·18

    O·,~O~-----,!20~--""'-)O

    1000/0

    Fig. I-Variation of E',., with 1000jD at 25°C

  • EL-HARAKANY et 01.:THERMODYNAMICS OF HCI IN WATER-ETHOXYETHANOL MIXTURES

    Table5-Values of Standard Free Energy, Enthalpy andEntropy Changes of Transfer in Water-z-ethoxyethanol

    System at 25° and 35°C

    [ECS] &G~ &H~ &S~(wt %) (cal mol :") (cal mol '") (cal mol -I deg -I)

    At 25°C

    9.32 77 77 018.54 190 190 027.87 259 259 037.26 305 -1007 -447.02 477 -1758 -856.70 559 -2689 -1166.88 907 -4427 -18

    At 35°C9.32 80 80 0

    18.54 156 156 027.87 256 256 037.26 332 -1023 -447.02 446 -1864 -856.70 676 -2682 -1166.88 1094 -4420 -18

    ECS = 2-Ethoxyethanol

    I1H~ values were computed from Eq. (4) at eachtemperature.

    It can be seen that I1G~ values are positivelyincreased by increasing percentage of the organicsolvent indicating that the transfer of Hel from waterto water-2-ethoxyethanol is a non-spontaneousprocess. This suggests that the affinity of the organicsolvent for Hel is less than that of water, i.e., water ismore basic component of the mixed solvent. This viewis also consistent with the fact that the "escaping"tendency of H'Cl is greater in 2-ethoxyethanol-watermixtures.

    Besides the less discriminating free energy changes,which are not affected by structural factors, the

    changes in entropy and enthalpy might offer somelimited interpretation of the structural changes. Since,the structure-breaking process is endothermic whereasthe structure-forming process is exothermic, it mightbe possible to predict that at low concentrations of theorganic solvent, both H + and Cl - ions are stillsolvated by the more polar water molecules. At higherconcentrations of 2-ethox..yethanol, I1St and I1Ho arefound to have negative values and decrease withincreasing concentration of the organic solvent.

    References1 Feakins D & French C M, J chem Soc, (1957) 2581.2 Franks F & Smith H T, J chem Engng Data, 13 (1968) 538.3 Franks F, Physicochemical processes in mixed aqueous solvents

    (Elsevier, New York) 1967,50.4 Beal J L & Mann C A, J phys Chem, 42 (1938) 283.5 Carmody W R, JAm chem Soc, 51 (1929) 2901.6 Hills G J & Ives D I, J chem Soc, (1951) 305.7 Harned H S & Morrison J 0, Am J Sci, 32 (1937) 161.8 Sadek H, Tadros Th F & EI-Harakany A A, Electrochim Acta, 16

    (1971) 339.9 Gronwall T H, Lamer V K & Sandved K, Physik Z, 29 (1928)

    358.10 Sadek H & Tadros Th F, Trans Faraday Soc, 58 (1962) 2192.11 Sadek H & Tadros Th F, Z physik Chem, 22 (1959) 179.12 Spencher H M, JAm chem Soc, 54 (1933) 3647.13 Sen V, Kundu K K & Das M N, J phys Chem, 71 (1%7) 3665.14 Harned H S & Thomas H C, JAm chem Soc, 57 (1935) 1666.15 Harned H S & Calmon C, JAm chem Soc, 61 (1939) 1491.16 Moore R L & Flesing W A, J Am chem Soc, 69 (1947) 1076.17 Sadek H, J Indian chem Soc, 28 (1951) 619.18 Sadek H, EI-Harakany A A & El-Nadory N A, Electrochim Acta,

    17 (1972) 1754.19 Harned H S & Owens B B, The physical chemistry of electrolytic

    solutions (Reinhold, New York), 1958,473.20 Born M, Z Physik, I (1920) 45.21 Oiwa 1 T, J phys Chem, 60 (1956) 754.22 Sadek H, Tadros Th F & El-Harakany A A, Electrochim Acta, 16

    (1971) 353.

    931