thermodynamics on sog-si refining processes...r y f f o r m at i o n f o r o x i d e s (k j / m o l...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Thermodynamics on SOG-SiRefining Processes
Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo
Kazuki Morita
The 3rd Workshop onReactive Metal Processing
2
Recent Research Fields
・Physical Chemistry of High Temperature Processing (Steelmaking and Waste Management)
・Microwave Processing for Recycling and Waste Treatment
・Thermodynamics and Processing on Solar Grade Silicon (SOG-Si) Production
Materials Production and Recycling Engineering Lab.
(Formerly Ferrous Metallurgy Lab.)
3
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Metallurgical refining for SOG-Si- Thermodynamic properties of impurities in molten Si alloys -
- Optimized Process Combined with Leaching Treatment -
3. Solidification refining of Si with Si-Al metls
- Segregation ratios of impurities between solid Si and Si-Al melt -
4. Conclusions and Future Work
4
Requirement for metallurgical refining process for SOG-Si
Depending on off-grade Si for semiconductor
Increase in solar cell production
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 1001011021031040
100200300400500600700800900
100011001200
Am
ount
of p
rodu
ctio
n (M
W)
YearFig. Amount of solar cell production by various processes.
Total
Poly Crystalline
Single Crystalline
AmorphousRibbon
00 01 02 03 04
5
Possibility of Low Cost SOG-Si Production
Can we remove impurities from MG-silicon by metallurgical refining processes ?
MG-Si SOG-Si
New Refining Process?
6
Ti
Fe
P
Al
Fig. Solar-cell efficiency versus impurity concentration for 4-Ω・cm p-base devices.
Fe, Ti, Al, P, B
Impurtiry Content(ppma)
Fe 1300 Ti 220 Al 3300 P 30 B 30
Table 1 Impurity contents in MG-Si.
Impurities and solar cell efficiency
7
-1600
-1200
-800
-400
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
4 Cu + O2= 2 Cu2O
2 Fe + O2 = 2 FeO
2 C + O2 = 2 CO
C + O2 = CO2
3/2 Fe + O2= 1/2 Fe3O4
2 Mn + O2= 2 MnO
Si + O2= SiO2
4/3 Ti + O2= 2/3 Ti2O3
4/3 Al + O2= 2/3 Al2O3
2 Mg + O 2= 2 MgO
2 Ca + O 2= 2 CaO
Temperature (K)
Gib
bs e
nerg
y of
form
atio
n fo
r oxi
des
(kJ/
mol
O2)
-1600
-1200
-800
-400
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
4 Cu + O2= 2 Cu2O
2 Fe + O2 = 2 FeO
2 C + O2 = 2 CO
C + O2 = CO2
3/2 Fe + O2= 1/2 Fe3O4
2 Mn + O2= 2 MnO
Si + O2= SiO2
4/3 Ti + O2= 2/3 Ti2O3
4/3 Al + O2= 2/3 Al2O3
2 Mg + O 2= 2 MgO
2 Ca + O 2= 2 CaO
Temperature (K)
Gib
bs e
nerg
y of
form
atio
n fo
r oxi
des
(kJ/
mol
O2)
Fe-FeO
Al-Al2O3
Mg-MgOCa-CaO
Si-SiO2
Fig. Ellingham diagram for some representative elements.
Strong Affinity of Silicon for Oxygen=
Difficulty inOxidation Treatment
8
Si Standard : solid Si standard : solid
GM solid0 - 0 - liquid
liquid solid
→Component X Si
LL T1
S+LS+L S
Si Si
(a) Small segregation coefficient
→Component X→Component X
→Component X
T=T1
Si
GM
(b) Large segregation coefficient
T1
T=T1
Fig. Relationship between Gibbs free energy and phase diagram below melting point of silicon.
P, B, C, etc.Most metallicimpurities
9
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 10010-1110-1010-910-810-710-610-510-410-310-210-1100101102103104
segregation coefficient
impu
rity
cont
ent (
ppm
w) after first
solidification
after secondsolidification
Impurity content of MG-SiRequired impurity content for SOG-Si
Al
NiCr
Fe
V
Ti BP
Fig. Removal of impurity in silicon by solidification refining.
10
Thermodynamic properties of impurities in molten silicon alloys
・PhosphorousEquilibrated in a controlled phosphorous partial pressure
・Titanium and IronEquilibrated with lead
・Aluminum, Calcium and MagnesiumEquilibrated with Oxides
11
Thermodynamics of P in Molten Silicon
Gas Inlet Tube
Porous Alumina Block
Molten Si-P Alloy
Graphite or Alumina Crucible
Graphite Holder
Mullite Tube
Fig. Schematic Cross Section of Experimental Apparatus.
Ar+P4(P2+P)
To Ribbon Heater Temperature Controller
Ar+P4
Thermocouple
Silicone Plug
Red Phosphorus Ribbon Heater
Ar
Red Phosphorus Temperature 398-461KArgon Flow Rate 190cc/min
Fig. Schematic cross section of the phosphorus vapor generator.
To Ribbon Heater Temperature Controller
Ar+P4
Thermocouple
Silicone Plug
Red Phosphorus Ribbon Heater
Ar
Red Phosphorus Temperature 398-461KArgon Flow Rate 190cc/min
Fig. Schematic cross section of the phosphorus vapor generator.
12
0.05 0.1
0.001
0.002
0[mass%P]
P P 1/
2 (atm
1/2 )
2
1750 1800 1850-80
-70
-60
-50
T(K)Fr
ee e
nerg
y ch
ange
(kJ/
mol
)
1/2 P2(g)=P(mass%, in Si)ΔG°= -139,000+43.4T (J/mol)
Fig. Relationship between equilibrium phosphorous partial pressure and phosphorous concentration of silicon at 1823K.
Fig. Temperature dependence of free energy change of phosphorous dissolution into silicon.
13
10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-110-1610-1510-1410-1310-1210-1110-1010-910-810-710-610-510-4
[mass%P]
P(a
tm)
P
P
P
P2
P,
PP 2
1 2 3 4
0.01
0.02
0.03
0Time (ks)(V
/A)・
log(
[mas
s%P]
0/[m
ass%
P]t)(
m) Suzuki et al.
estimated
Yuge et al.
1823K 1867K
Ikeda et al.estimated
Fig. Relationship between equilibrium partial pressure of P, P2 and phosphorous content of silicon at 1823K.
Fig. Relationship between time for vacuum treatment and (V/A)・log([mass%P]0/[mass%P]t).
Hertz-Knudsen equation
iiii Xp
RTM
dtdy
⋅⋅⋅= 0
2γ
π
14
Fig. Schematic Cross Section of Experimental Apparatus.
Gas Inlet Tube
Porous AluminaBlock
Graphite Crucible
Graphite Holder
Mullite Tube
Graphite Lid
Molten Si-M(M:Fe,Ti)
Molten Lead
Fig. Phase diagram of Si-Pb system.
Thermodynamics of Ti and Fe in Molten Silicon
Si Pb
15
0 0.02 0.04 0.06-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
XFe in Si
lnX F
e in
Pb-
lnX F
e in
Si-1
4.1X
Pb in
Si
-23.
8XSi
in P
b+4.
91
lnXFe in Pb-lnXFe in Si-14.1XPb in Si-23.8XSi in Pb+4.91=-3.56(±0.40)+3.17(±5.46)XFe in Si
γ°Fe(l) in Si=2.85×10-2
εFeFe
in Si=3.17
0 0.025 0.05 0.075 0.1-9
-8
-7
-6
XTi in Si
lnX T
i in
Pb-ln
X Ti i
n Si
-13.
2XPb
in S
i
-10.
8XSi
in P
b-1.
74
lnXTi in Pb-lnXTi in Si-13.2XPb in Si
= -7.71+3.97XTi in Si
γ°Ti(l) in Si=4.48×10-4
εTiTi
in Si=3.97
-10.8XSi in Pb-1.74
Fig. Relationsip between XTi in Si and ln XPb in Pb – ln XPb in Si at 1723K.
Fig. Relationsip between XFe in Si and ln XPb in Pb – ln XPb in Si at 1723K.
16
Ti and Fe are stable in molten silicon.
Removal of Ti and Fe by chemical reaction (i.e. oxidation, chlorination) is considered to be impossible.
Double solidification process is required.
17Fig. Schematic Cross Section of Experimental Apparatus.
Graphite Holder
Al2O3-Al6Si2O13 Crucible
Molten Si-Al Alloy
SiO2 Crucible
Molten Si-Ca Alloy
Molten SiO2 satd.CaO-SiO2 Slag
SiO2 Crucible
Molten Si-Mg Alloy
Molten MgSiO3, SiO2satd.MgO-SiO2-Al2O3 Slag
MgSiO3, SiO2 pellet
Thermodynamics of Al, Ca and Mg in Molten Silicon
Al
Ca
Mg
18
5.4 5.6 5.8
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
-3.6
-3.4
-3.2
-3
-2.8
-2.6
104/T(K-1)
log γ A
l(l),
log γ M
g(l)
log γ C
a(l)
Ca
Mg
Al
172317731823T(K)
Fig. Temperature dependence of the activity coefficient of aluminum, calcium, and magnesium in molten silicon relative to pure liquid.
51.411300ln
55.114300ln
452.03610ln
Ca
Al
+−=
+−=
+−=
T
T
T
Mgγ
γ
γ
19
1 2 3 4 5 6
10
20
30
0
1000
2000
3000
0
P
Ca
Al
Fig. Relationship between vacuum time and impurity content of silicon at 1823K.
Time(ks)
mas
s ppm
P
mas
s ppm
Al,
mas
s ppm
Ca
0.739m240.3m2mass of Si : 1000kg
surface area
P, Al, Ca and Mg can be removed by vacuum melting.
Mg
20
Vacuum melting by electron beam
Vacuum
Plasma melting with water vapor
Directional solidification
MG-Si
ArgonSOG-Si
Removal of P, (Al, Ca) Removal of B, C
Removal of Fe,Ti,Al
First step purification Second step purification
Directional solidification
Removal of Fe,Ti,Al
Lower cost refining process is desired to be developed
NEDO SOG-Si Manufacturing Process(Operated in JFE Steel Co.)
21
Is there any way to reduce the times of solidification refining?
If the treatment of MG-Si can remove 90% of Ti and Fe, ・・・・・
Possibility of Acid Leaching
22
Si-Ca-Fe or Ti dissolved at 1723K
Cooling to 1300K(CaSi2 formation)
Acid leaching withaqua regia
Chemical analysis
Acid Leaching Test with Ca Addition
Porous AluminaBlock
Graphite Crucible
Graphite HolderAr
23
Removal Fraction of Fe
24
Fig. Phase Diagram of the Si rich corner for the Ca-Fe-Si System [calculated by Thermo-Calc]
Eutectic PointXCa/XFe≒6.4
Secondary PhaseCaSi2 or FeSi2 ?
Consideration of Removal Behavior of Fe with the Ca-Fe-Si Phase Diagram
25
Fig.(a) SEM micrograph of Si-Ca-Fe alloy.(b) Microstructure of Si-Ca-Fe alloy.(c) Concentration profile by EPMA line analysis.
Si-3.26%Ca-0.424%Fe, 4.4K/min
26
Fig.(a) SEM micrograph of Si-Ca-Fe alloy.(b) Microstructure of Si-Ca-Fe alloy.(c) Concentration profile by EPMA line analysis.
Si-2.41%Ca-0.685%Fe, 4.4K/min
27
Vacuum melting by electron beam
Vacuum
Plasma melting with water vapor
Directional solidification
MG-Si
Argon
SOG-Si
Removal of P, (Al, Ca) Removal of B, C, (Al, Ca)
Removal of Fe,Ti,Al
First step purification Second step purification
Directional solidification
Removal of Fe,Ti,Al
NEDO SOG-Si Manufacturing Process(Operated in JFE Steel Co.)
P : 30 → < 0.1ppmw B : 5-10 → 0.1-0.3 ppmw
Acid leaching treatment with Ca additionRemoval of Fe and Ti
28
Vacuum melting by electron beam
Vacuum
Plasma melting with water vapor
Directional solidification
MG-Si
Argon
SOG-Si
Removal of P, (Al, Ca) Removal of B, C, (Al, Ca)
Removal of Fe,Ti,Al
First step purification Second step purification
Directional solidification
Removal of Fe,Ti,Al
NEDO SOG-Si Manufacturing Process(Operated in JFE Steel Co.)
P : 30 → < 0.1ppmw B : 5-10 → 0.1-0.3 ppmw
Acid leaching treatment with Ca additionRemoval of Fe, Ti, P and B
Reduction of processing time
29
Solidification refining of Si with Si-Al melt at low temperature.
Low eutectic temperature
Fig. Phase diagram of Si-Al system.
Removal of impurities by use of enhanced segregation at low temperature
Phase diagrams for the Si-Al system
MG-Si(98-99%)
Pure Al
Segregation ratiomeltAlSiini
Sisolidinii X
Xk
−
=
30
Segregation ratios of impurities between solid Si and Si-Al melt
·Thermodynamics of impurity elements in solid SiEvaluation of low temperature Si refining process
Segregation ratios of impurities between Si-Al melt and solid Si
Al, B, P Fe,Ti, etc.
Experimentally determined
Theoretically determined
31Fig. Diffusion coefficient of impurity elements in solid silicon.
Al, P, B ··· Considerably small diffusion coefficient in solid Si
Solidification method to attain the equilibrium
Diffusion coefficient of impurity elements in solid SiDetermination for segregation ratios of P and B
32
1 2
Solid Si
Si-Al melt
Solid Si
T2
T1
Tm,A
C1sC1
l C2l C2
s A
Component BDistance
a) b)
Tem
p.→
LS
L+S
Fig. Schematic diagrams of the temperature gradient zone melting.(a) Portion of phase diagram. (b) Temperature gradient in system.(c) Physical system comprising (A+B)molten zone traveling through solid A.
c)
Temperature Gradient Zone Melting(TGZM) methodDetermination for segregation ratios of P and B
Precipitated Si
33
Temperature Gradient Zone Melting MethodAl and P contents in solid silicon -
EPMA analysisAr atmosphere 24-72h
Temperature Gradient 10-40K/cm
1
2
3
4
5 6 8
10
11
97
12
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of an experimental apparatus: 1-SiC heating element; 2-thermocouple connected to PID controller; 3-gas outlet tube; 4-stainless steel holder; 5-single crystalline silicon; 6-aluminum foil; 7-mullite tube; 8-thermocouple for measuring temperature of molten zone; 9-porous alumina boat 10-gas inlet tube; 11-alumina plate; 12-Sponge titanium
Distribution of P (and Al) between solid Si and Si-Al-P alloy
- Red phosphorus stuck Al foil
Distribution of B (and Al) between solid Si and Si-Al-B alloy
- Prepared Al-B foil
Determination for segregation ratios of P and B
Experimental method
34
Fig. Photo of a TGZM specimen after the experiment.
10mm
B A
Fig. Intensity profiles of Ka radiation of aluminum and phosphorus of the sample (accelerating voltage of 15kV, sample current of 200nA, sampling step of 10μm).
100 200 300 400 500 600
100
200
300
400
0Distance (μm)
Inte
nsiti
es o
f Kα r
adia
tion
ofal
umin
um a
nd p
hosp
horu
s P Al
(a) Single crystalline Si (d) Single crystalline Si(c) Si-Al zone
(b) Migrated region
Segregation ratio
Sample after TGZM experiment
Determination for segregation ratios of P and B
35
Segregation ratios of P and B
1200 1400 16000.01
0.05
0.1
0.5
1
5
Temperature (K)
Segr
egat
ion
ratio
P B
Segregation ratios are smaller at low temperature.Low temperature refining is effective.
Segregation ratio between solid Si and Si-Al melt
Segregation coefficient between solid/liquid Si.
36
si
si
li
li aRTGaRTG lnln 00 +=+
0
0
lnlnln si
li
fusi
li
si
i RTG
XX
kγγ
+Δ
==
Equality in chemical potential of impurity between solid Si and Si-Al melt
1)
2)
Activity coefficients in solid Si and Si-Al meltBased on the reported thermodynamic data
Derivation of segregation ratio of impurity elements between solid Si and Si-Al melt
37
Segregation ratios between solid Si and Si-Al melt< Segregation coefficients between solid/liquid Si
Segregation ratio between Si-Al melt and solid Si Element
1073K 1273K 1473K
Segregation coefficient between solid/liquid Si at
m.p. of Si(6-3)
Fe 1.7×10-11 5.9×10-9 3.0×10-7 6.4×10-6
Ti 3.8×10-9 1.6×10-7 9.6×10-7 2.0×10-6
Cr 4.9×10-10 2.5×10-8 2.5×10-7 1.1×10-5
Mn 3.4×10-10 4.5×10-8 9.9×10-7 1.3×10-5
Ni 1.3×10-9 1.6×10-7 4.5×10-6 1.3×10-4
Cu 9.2×10-8 4.4×10-6 2.5×10-5 4.0×10-4
Zn 2.2×10-9 1.2×10-7 2.1×10-6 1.0×10-5
Ag 1.9×10-8 1.7×10-6 6.6×10-6 5.0×10-5
Au 1.5×10-11 6.1×10-9 3.6×10-7 2.5×10-5
Ga 2.1×10-4 8.9×10-4 2.4×10-3 8.0×10-3
In 1.1×10-5 4.9×10-5 1.5×10-4 4.0×10-4
Sb 3.4×10-3 3.7×10-3 8.2×10-3 2.3×10-2
Pb 9.7×10-5 2.9×10-4 1.0×10-3 2.0×10-3
Bi 1.3×10-6 2.1×10-5 1.7×10-4 7.0×10-4
P 4.0×10-2 8.5×10-2 1.6×10-1 3.5×10-1
B 7.6×10-2 2.2×10-1 4.9×10-1 8.0×10-1
Al 1.4×10-4 4.9×10-4 1.2×10-3 2.8×10-3
3810-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
—
Contents of MG-Si — Allowable contents for SOG-S Contents after solidification refining with Si-Al melt Contents after ordinary solidification refining
Impu
rity
cont
ent (
ppm
w)
—
——
Fe Ti P B
Impurity contents of Si after low temperature solidification refining with Si-Al melt at 1273K and ordinary Si solidification refining of MG-Si.
Contents after purification; Ci = ki Ciini Initial content
(MG-Si)at 1273K
Si
39
Viewing the development of the solidification refining of Si with Si-Al melt at low temperature
Fig. Phase diagram of Si-Al system.
Si bathAl bath
Si-Al melt
Poly or Single Crystalline ?
・ Discussion of the Si solidification method from Si-Al melt
・ Refining test
40
Discussion for separating of solid Si from Si-Al melt by flotation
Holding Si-55.3at%Al alloy (liquidus temp. 1273K) at 1173K for 12hSi saturated, solid fraction = 0.168
Needle like Si grainsPreparation – Melting in the
induction furnace and rapid cooling
(ρsolid Si < 2.33g/cm3, ρAl-25.8%Si ~ 2.45g/cm3)
41
Separation of solidified Si from Si-Al melt using electromagnetic force
― Induction furnace
13
7
1211
54 6
8
109
2
Si-55.3at%Al alloy (liquidus, 1273K) was melted and held at 1323K in the induction furnace
Measuring the surface temp. of the melt by the infrared pyrometer
Cooling and Solidifying the sample by lowering from the position of induction coil
42
Solidified Si-Al alloy using induction furnace
Agglomeration of solidified Si by electromagnetic stirring
Bottom
1cm
43
Si-Al melt Solidified Si
Inductioncoil
J
B
J
BInduced flow
F
・Difference in induced swirl current to the perpendicular direction
Solidification of Si at lower position
・Downward bulk flow Agglomeration of Si grains to the bottom of the sample
Agglomeration mechanism of Si under the fixed alternative magnetic field
→ Solidification refining test
44
Fig. Schematic cross section of experimental apparatus.
Alumina block
Gas inlet tube
Induction coil
Graphite crucible
Quartz tube
Prism
Molten alloy
Melting and holding at 1323K or 1223K
Cooling and solidifying the sample by lowering from the coil
Measuring the surface temp.by infrared pyrometer
Experimental method
Crashing the Si agglomerated part (> 840μm), then acid cleaning
Sample No. Fe Ti Al B P
PrSi-1 4500 691 1280 56 36
PrSi-2 2160 248 1560 36 19
Synthesized MG-Si was alloyed to Si-55.3at%Al(liquidus, 1273K) or Si-64.6 at%Al(liquidus, 1173K) with pure Al
45
Sample No Source Fe Ti B P Al
SR-1 PrSi-1 13 (99.7%) 5.2 (99.2%) 0.81 (98.6%) 0.93 (97.4%) 599 (53.1%)
SR-2 PrSi-1 13 (99.7%) 2.7 (99.6%) 0.88 (98.4%) 1.2 (96.7%) 534 (58.1%)
SR-3 PrSi-2 20 (99.1%) 2.8 (98.9%) 0.71 (98.1%) 0.72 (96.3%) 575 (63.1%)
SR-4 PrSi-2 27 (98.8%) 4.5 (98.2%) 1.90 (94.8%) 1.0 (95.1%) 602 (61.3%)
SR-5 PrSi-1 47 (99.0%) 7.7 (98.9%) 0.98 (98.3%) 0.42 (98.8%) 538 (57.8%)
SR-6 PrSi-1 36 (99.2%) 5.6 (99.2%) 0.99 (98.2%) 0.66 (98.2%) 453 (64.5%)
Fe, Ti・・・ Well reduced but not as well as predicted valuesB, P・・・ Effectively removed
Impurity contents of refined Si in the test run (ppmw)
High ability for purification was confirmed.
46
Vacuum melting by electron beam
Reduction of SiO2 in arc furnace
Removal of P, (Al, Ca)
Removal of Fe,Ti,Al
Directional solidification
Alloying of silicon with Al
SOG-Si
Solidification refining with Si-Al melts
Pre-refined Si (5N except Al)
Proposal of refining process for SOG-Si
Acid cleaning
47
Conclusions and Future WorkThe optimum metallurgical refining process for SOG-Si was thermodynamically assessed.
Possibility of solidification refining of Siwith Si-Al melt was clarified. Solidification and separation of Si from the melt is the major problem to solve for the practical process.
48
Acknowledgments
Present data are based on two Doctoral Dissertations by Takahiro Miki (1999), now a research associate of Tohoku University, and Takeshi Yoshikawa (2005), now an assistant professor of Osaka University.
49
Periodical Journal Publication List 1Metallurgical Refining
・T.Miki, K.Morita and N.Sano :Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 27B(1996), 937-942, “Thermodynamics of Phosphorus in Molten Silicon”・T.Miki, K.Morita and N.Sano :Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 28B(1997), 861-867, “Thermodynamic Properties of Titanium and Iron in Molten Silicon”・T.Miki, K.Morita and N.Sano :Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 28B(1997), 861-867, “Thermodynamic Properties of Titanium and Iron in Molten Silicon”・T.Miki, K.Morita and M.Yamawaki :Journal of the Mass Spectrometry Society of Japan、47(1999), 72-75, “Measurements of Thermodynamic Properties of Iron in Molten Silicon by Knudsen Effusion Method”・T.Miki, K.Morita and N.Sano :Materials Transactions, JIM, 40 (1999), 1108-1116, “Thermodynamic Properties of Si-Al, -Ca, -Mg Binary and Si-Ca-Al, -Ti, -Fe Ternary Alloys”・坂田智浩、三木貴博、森田一樹 :日本金属学会誌、66(2002), 459-465, “酸リーチングによる多結晶シリコン中鉄、チタンの除去”・K.Morita and T.Miki :Intermetallics, 11(2003), 1111-1117, “Thermodynamics on Solar-Grade-Silicon Refining”・G.Inoue, T.Yoshikawa and K.Morita :High Temperature Materials and Processes, 22(2003), 221-226, “Effect of Calcium on Thermodynamic Properties of Boron in MoltenSilicon”・T.Shinpo, T.Yoshikawa and K.Morita :Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 35B(2004), 277-284, “Thermodynamic Study of the Effect of Calcium on Removal of Phosphorus from Silicon by Acid Leaching Treatment”
50
Periodical Journal Publication List 2Solidification Refining
・T.Yoshikawa and K.Morita :J.Electrochem. Soc., 150(2003), G465-G468, “Solid Solubilities and Thermodynamic Properties of Aluminum in Solid Silicon”・T.Yoshikawa and K.Morita :Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 4(2003), 531-537, “Removal of Phosphorus by the Solidification Refining with Si–Al Melts”・T.Yoshikawa and K.Morita :Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 66(2005), 261-265, “Thermodynamics of Solid Silicon Equilibrated with Si-Al-Cu Liquid Alloys”・T.Yoshikawa and K.Morita :Materials Transaction, 46(2005), 1335-1340, “Thermodynamic Property of B in Molten Si and Phase Relations for the Si-Al-B System”
・T.Yoshikawa and K.Morita :ISIJ International, 45(2005), 967-971, “Refining of Si by the Solidification of Si-Al Melt with Electromagnetic Force”・T.Yoshikawa and K.Morita :Metallurgical and Materirals Transactions B, 36B(2005), 731-736, “Removal of B from Si by the Solidification Refining with Si–Al Melts”・T.Yoshikawa, K.Arimura and K.Morita :Metallurgical and Materirals Transactions B, 36B(2005), 837-842, “B Removal by Ti Addition in the Solidification Refining of Si with Si–Al Melts”・T.Yoshikawa and K.Morita :Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 420(2006), 136-144“Activity Measurements of Al and Cu in Si-Al-Cu Melt at 1273 and 1373 K by the Equilibration with Molten Pb”