‘they’ve fallen and hit their head… now...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
‘They’ve Fallen and
Hit their Head… Now What…?’
Workshop
APM Ethics Committee Study Days
Telford, January 2016
Dr Craig Gannon
![Page 2: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Princess Alice Hospice, Esher, 1995-
– Medical Director, clinical ethics committee
• University of Surrey, Guildford, 2012-
– Visiting Reader, ex-university ethics committee
• Association of Palliative Medicine
– Ethics Committee, 2009 – on-going
• Publications / teaching
– Ethics in BMJ, JME, IJPN, CE, NE
• Royal College Physicians
– SCE Question Writer, Exam Board, Standard Setting Group
Jobbing Consultant
Not Philosopher, Lawyer...
2
![Page 3: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
J7 to J14 of M25
3
![Page 4: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• Make your own mind up
– Workshop!
• The ethical issues following a head injury
– Three cases
• How make mind up not what is right action
– Enhances clarity of thought
• Better decisions
• Better communication
• Better engagement
Plan – Get You Thinking!
4
![Page 5: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Be Provocative…
5
![Page 6: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Explore clinical, ethical, legal principles
– Generalisations... not case-by-case!
• Share my / our opinions
– No absolute right vs. wrong
– I’m not necessarily ethical!
• Healthcare isn’t always ethical!
– No perfect answers...!
– Realistic expectations…?
NO Answers… NOT Tell!
6
![Page 7: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Who Here is Already
an Expert in Ethics?
7
![Page 8: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• Our choices…
– Test of our behaviour / character
• Our opinion…
– View on others’ behaviour / character
Ethics is Everywhere:
… We’re Life-Long Learners!
8
![Page 9: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• Descriptive ethics –
– Observe; what do we see people decide?
• Normative ethics – Judge; what should people think is right?
• Applied ethics – Do; How to put moral knowledge into practice?
• Meta-ethics – Nature; what does 'right' even mean?
Gentle Reminder:
Classes of Ethics
9
![Page 10: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Normative Ethics Made Easy!
• Three key ways to test our care:
• Duty-based ethics (deontology)
– Do duty
• Consequentialism
– Get result
• Virtue ethics
– Match good character
10
![Page 11: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• Do right thing
– Whatever the outcome
• Only path matters
– Traditional
– Clear, follow rules
– Inflexible
• Risk jobs-worth doctor
– No DNACPR, so do CPR in T/C
– Not use CD drugs if not signed
– Never admit from out of area
Kant’s Duty-Based Ethics
11
![Page 12: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Try for best results
– Whatever it takes
• Outcome only
– Modern / selfish
– Clear, results
– Presumptive
• Risk cavalier doctor
– ‘T/C’ just to get in hospice
– ‘Ca2+ normal’ when forgot
– Not admit out-of-area if no £
Consequentialism
12
Lance Armstrong “wins” stage
Tour de France in 2004
![Page 13: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• “Good” character
– Reflects “worthy”
• Balancing all needs
– Ideal vs. naïve…?
– How; subjective?
– Who; judges?
• Risk drippy doctor
– Too nice, not able to decide!
– No help when it’s difficult
– No help when it’s urgent
Virtue Ethics
13
![Page 14: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Cannot ‘mix & match’ or unprincipled
– One principle you / everyone should follow…
– Choose one to use in workshop section…
• Duty-based ethics
– Follow rules… whatever outcome, even patient harm
• Consequentialism
– Get result… at any cost / break rules, even GMC / law
• Virtue ethics
– Do what a person of good character would do
Which Moral Philosophy
is Right for You at Work…?
14
![Page 15: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Different Ethical Approaches;
30 mph Speed Limit
• Duty-based ethics
– 30 mph maximum
– Law is law, full stop
• Consequentialism
– 33 mph usually
– Never “done” <34 mph
• Virtue ethics
– 30 mph normal max
– 35 mph if emergency
15
![Page 16: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Same Road… Same Principle
You Notice You're Speeding…?
• Duty-based ethics
– 30 mph maximum
– Law is law, full stop
• Consequentialism
– Hit brakes so 29 mph!
– No risk <30 mph
• Virtue ethics
– Carry on at 33 mph, take the fine; as not safe to hit brakes
16
![Page 17: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• Moral elasticity and moral multiplicity
– Bend / shift ethics to do what you want!
– Real world... increasingly “accepted”
– Play clever is the new ‘worthy’...?!
2016: Un-Virtuous Ethics:
…Morals, Only When Suits!!
You must obey rules… I just want fair play
17
I don’t obey rules, they’re just for fools
![Page 18: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Decision-Making After
Head Injury in ‘Hospice’
18
![Page 19: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
• On-call doctor for a hospice
– Live 25 minutes drive away
• Telephoned, “patient has fallen”
– Good details from on-site staff
– Possibly “serious” head injury; details on handout
– Patient “too woozy” to give view
• Need decision now as you are ‘lead clinician’
– Stay put for comfort and T/C or 999 / send to A&E?
– What influences your advice?
Decision-Making After
Head Injury in ‘Hospice’
19
![Page 20: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
• In 3 groups, “quick” 15 minutes – 1 of 3 different scenarios on hand-outs
• Abbreviations – S/C, symptom control; ‘expected’ to get home
– T/C, terminal care; ‘imminently’ dying
– QoL, quality of life
– HCP, healthcare professional
– LPA, lasting power of attorney
– DNACPR, do not attempt resuscitation
– PPC, Preferred Priorities of Care
– ADRT, Advance Decision to Refuse Treatment
Decision-Making After
Head Injury in ‘Hospice’
20
![Page 21: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Why Do Some Decisions
Feel So Difficult...?
• Misplaced HCP fears create problem
– Not unique, any treatment = a treatment
– Explicit, but same issues at end of life
– Not more difficult patients / families
• Mustn’t abandon normal approach
– Our best advice (uncertainties)
– Individualised care (different views)
– Imperfect, but sufficient, as always…
21
![Page 22: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Paradox:
Everyone is on Same Side…
• No conflict…
– Need reassure / remind everyone (ourselves!)
• Be realistic…
– Decision as right as possible
– Satisfies all stakeholders:
• Patients / families / friends
• Professionals, organisations
• Media
• Courts
![Page 23: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
When at Odds…
…Always Avoidable?
• HCP suboptimal practice
– Clinical, legal, ethics gaps
• Poor clinical decisions
– Don’t do it right
• Poor explanations
– Don’t explain it right
• Unhappy when told not for any food or fluids by unsure F1
![Page 24: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• No ethical dilemmas:
• To offer / give treatment it must be:
– Required
– Acquired
– Desired
Our Duty for Any Treatment
…is Simple!
24
![Page 25: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
1. Could treatment work?
– Predictable net gain
2. Is treatment available?
– Ambulance / in hospital
3. Is treatment wanted?
– Consent / no refusal
Our Duty… is Simple…!
“Required, Acquired and Desired”
25
‘Yes’ X3 = Transfer!
![Page 26: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Your Decision
After Head Injury…
26
![Page 27: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
• Reassure
– Never wrong…
• Scare
– Never right!!!
Ethical Deliberation:
None or Many Answers…!
27
![Page 28: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
• As in clinical practice, we won’t all agree
– Could it work?
– Is it available?
– Is it wanted?
Your Decision
Case 1, After Head Injury…
28
![Page 29: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
• Could it work? No
– Clinical ‘triage’; no treatment indicated – no net gain
• Is it available? No
– Rationed; neurosurgery not on offer / paramedic “no”
• Is it wanted? No
– No is “sufficiently” in-line with patient…?
• Notes – clinical / patient first
– Over-rules “family”
– Your CEO may have a view if ignore lawyer…?!
– If consequentialist vs. virtue vs. duty-based
Case 1 Potential Answer…
T/C in Hospice
29
![Page 30: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
• As in clinical practice, we won’t all agree…
– Could it work?
– Is it available?
– Is it wanted?
Your Decision
Case 2, After Head Injury…
30
![Page 31: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
• Could it work? No
– Clinical triage; not fit to move / no indication; no net gain
• Is it available? No
– Ration; dying; no neurosurgery even if paramedic ‘yes’
• Is it wanted? N/A!
– Over-rule patient and family: clinically best in hospice
• Notes – clinical / patient first
– Scary… less certain! Even LPA (…in theory?)
– Defensive; fell from a hoist, your benefit vs. your guilt…?
– If consequentialist vs. virtue vs. duty-based
Case 2 Potential Answer…
T/C in Hospice!
31
![Page 32: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
• As in clinical practice, we won’t all agree…
– Could it work?
– Is it available?
– Is it wanted?
Your Decision
Case 3, After Head Injury…
32
![Page 33: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
• Could it work? Yes
– Potentially reversible pathology
• Is it available? Yes
– Active management would be offered in hospital, but…
• Is it wanted? No
– Clear Best Interests +/- valid and applicable ADRT
• Notes – clinical / patient first
– In theory… but send in practice (for her family)???
– Flaw in ADRT; was this foreseen, could mind changed?
– If consequentialist vs. virtue vs. duty-based
Case 3, Potential Answer…
T/C in Hospice?
33
![Page 34: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Key Issues
Across the Three Cases
34
Legal
Policy Duty
Conscience
Patient / NoK Colleagues
![Page 35: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
• Could it work?
• If yes; it available?
• If both yes; is it wanted?
• If unclear, default is offer and give unless refusal:
– Competent refusal
– Valid and applicable ADRT / LPA refusal
• All other factors less influence, even if emotive
– Discretionary… ‘ethically’ no less important…?
– Consensus ideal, but not needed… the difficult bit…!
First do Clinical Questions… to
See if there’s a ‘Choice’
35
![Page 36: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
• Get decision ‘just right’
– Not “we always send to be safe”!
– Not “we don’t send to hospital”!
– Not “we follow ACP”!
– Not “we do want family want”!
• All decisions, always ‘maybe’
– Acknowledge difficult
– May over-treat / may under-treat
– Not impossible… easy!!!!
No Blanket Approach:
Not Too Fast or Slow to Send!
36
Goldilocks
![Page 37: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
• First step: will surgery help…?
– From evidence base: any predictable net gain?
– Only reasons for increased observations / investigations…
• Only if yes, then, is it available?
– Is HDU really on offer…?
– In this place / this context?
• Only then, is it wanted?
– Patient choice…
– If start here – it falls apart…!
Clinical Decision Making
Starts with Can Hospital Help...?
37
![Page 38: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Virtue Ethics: Not Lofty Ideal,
Just ‘Sits’ Between Two Vices
38
Vice: Excess
Unethical practice
e.g. cavalier
Virtue
Best Practice e.g. courageous
Vice: Deficiency
Unethical practice
e.g. cowardly
Common-sense middle ground
![Page 39: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Does Virtue Ethics
Apply to All Decisions…?
39
![Page 40: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Clinical Decisions Fail if Lacking
Professional Courage
40
Vice: unethical If just follow rules / path least resistance; only do as
in notes
Vice: unethical If don’t consider rules / do it my way; a blanket
yes / no Aristotle (384 BC – 322 BC)
![Page 41: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Need the Virtue of Courage:
…to Break Rules / Take Risks
41
‘Virtues’ Aristotle
(384 BC – 322 BC)
Professionalism: Discerning: weigh pros / cons:
treat when appropriate
A considered
expert view
![Page 42: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Conclusion: Ethics Means
No Blanket Decisions
42
Chris Froome / Team Sky
Tour de France, 2015
![Page 43: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Thank You
43
![Page 44: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Four Quadrant Approach Jonsen, Siegler & Winslade, 1992
1. Clinical issues 2. Patient preferences
Diagnosis / medical history
Goals of treatment?
What treatment options?
Probability of success / prognosis for each option
Best case / worst case / likely case
Does patient have capacity? Assess
Yes = consent, what do they want?
No = will it return / best interests;
Decide Best Interests – inform decision-making; prior expressed preferences or an
ADRT?
Consult stakeholders, is there a surrogate decision maker?
3. Quality of life 4. Contextual factors
What distress is the patient experiencing?
Multi dimensional: function / symptom /
existential
Difficult to define – person centred
Will treatment improve QoL / be acceptable
to the patient?
Religious, cultural, legal factors that need
to be taken into account?
Social / family influences... are there
conflicts of interest?
Resource limitations, or influence clinical
research / teaching?
44
![Page 45: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
A Patient’s Right to Refuse
Medical Interventions...
Phew! I’m off… That was easy...
45
![Page 46: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
• Even if they will die...?
• Even if it demands an action by HCPs...?
• Is ethical and legal guidance the same…?
• Are there ‘special’ cases?
Is the Right to Refuse
Treatment Absolute...?
46
![Page 47: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
• Cannot force patients into treatment
– Since 1990’s case law clear
• High profile UK cases
• With / without capacity
– Since 2007, reinforced in statute
• Without capacity
• Mental Capacity Act, 2005
100% Legal Right to Refuse
Life-Prolonging Therapy
47
![Page 48: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
• Any or no reason… even if irrational
– Agree to disagree, but cannot force care
– No harm required (unlike negligence)
– Risk battery, even if help
• Without prejudice
– All remaining best care must be offered
– Patient can change their mind
• Re B (2002) wanted discontinue ventilation
– Competent adult right to refuse medical treatment
– Deemed “unlawful trespass”
Legally Patients’ Right to Refuse
Absolute and Binding
48
![Page 49: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
• Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] HL, PVS
– Artificial hydration & nutrition are treatments
– Best practice into case law
• MCA 2005, since 2007
– Advance decision binding…if “valid & applicable”
– Statute – paradox, now harder to stop…???
Legally Refusal Still Binding After
Capacity is Lost
49
![Page 50: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
• Can you think of any ‘special’ cases?!
– When might you say ‘no’...?
A Patient’s Right to Refuse
Ethically NOT Absolute…?
50
![Page 51: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
• Turning off ventilator instant
• Removing an oesophageal stent invasive
• Turning off an ICD or pacemaker emotive
• Lack capacity just from ADRT nervous
Refusing a Patient’s Right to
Refuse the Special Cases?
51
![Page 52: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
• Public health risk
– Enforce isolation, treatment e.g. Ebola
• Reasonable boundaries
– Personal hygiene... infested house?
• Ambivalent and “panicking” patient
– Re MB (1997); footling breech, agreed LSCS but refused
anaesthetic as needle phobic
– Ruled lack of capacity; panic from fear of needle!
Must Override Patient Refusal if
Greater Clinical Need...?
52
![Page 53: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
• 34-year-old woman
• Jehovah witness
– ADRT; No Transfusion, even if life at risk
• RTA
– 999 to A&E; bleeding
• Retains capacity
– Refusing life-saving blood transfusion
• Can you give transfusion?
– What basis?
Case 1
Can You Refuse the Refusal?
53
![Page 54: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Why Can Decision-Making
Feel so Difficult…?
54
Should I, or shouldn’t I...?
![Page 55: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
• 34-year-old woman
– 30/40 pregnant
• Jehovah witness
– Valid ADRT... even if life at risk
• RTA
– 999 to A&E; bleeding
• Retains capacity
– Refusing life-saving blood transfusion
• Can you give transfusion?
– What basis?
Case 2
Can You Refuse the Refusal?
55
![Page 56: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Key Issues for Both Cases
56
Legal
Policy Duty
Conscience
Patient / NoK Colleagues
![Page 57: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
• Personal conscience
– Will vary
– Can you live with your decision?
• Professional duty
– Default is give, but “cannot” follow
– GMC / NMC may support either way…
• Unit policy
– Requirements will vary Trust to Trust...?
– May be disciplined
Key Issues for Both Cases
1 of 2
57
![Page 58: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
• Legal requirements
– Don’t give (battery / trespass)
– Possibly give (best interests)
– Judge & jury will decide if innocent or guilty...?
– Statute / case law or may set new precedent
• Subsequent views of patient / next of kin
– May sue if do or don’t transfuse…
• Subsequent views of colleagues
– Whistle blow, refuse work with you, make life nightmare
Key Issues for Both Cases
2 of 2
58
![Page 59: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
• Making DNACPR (omission)
• Turning off an ICD (act)
Acts vs. Omissions
Which is Easier for HCPs...?
59
Act of omitting to remove
the scissors!
![Page 60: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
• Discontinuing a treatment
– Act / withdraw...
• Not starting a treatment
– Omission / withhold...
• Historically seen as different
– Common and comforting
– Convenient
– Arguably incorrect
Any Difference Between
Acts and Omissions?
60
Act
Omission
![Page 61: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
• No professional bearing
– ‘Indistinguishable’ morally & legally » In Bland Law Lords decision, 1999
– “…act or omission…” » GMC, 2015
– Convicted arson, not for starting but as did nothing » Miller, R v [1983] HL
• Withholding is act of omission
– Same accountability / same responsibility
• Disease / therapy / time dictates if act / omission
– Already has NGT or doesn’t yet have NGT
No Clinical Distinction
Between Acts and Omissions
61
![Page 62: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
• 72-year-old man
• Ca oesophagus and liver secondaries
• Slow decline; bed bound prognosis ~ 1-2 weeks
• PEG feeds on 24-hour regimen
– No net gain… possibly more harm than good?
– PEG working well, assumed life-prolonging
• Lacks capacity; no advocate, no ADRT / LPA
• Can we stop the feeds now?
An Act: Case 1
62
![Page 63: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
• 72-year-old man
• Ca oesophagus and liver secondaries
• Slow decline; bed bound prognosis ~ 1-2 weeks
• PEG feeds on 12-hour regimen
– No net gain… possibly more harm than good?
– PEG blocked at end last feed, assumed life-prolonging
• Lacks capacity; no advocate, no ADRT / LPA
• Can we decide not replace PEG or restart feeds?
An Omission: Case 2
63
![Page 64: ‘They’ve Fallen and Hit their Head… Now What…?’apmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dr-Craig-Gannon_Approved... · APM Ethics Committee Study Days ... • Descriptive](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022030620/5ae703977f8b9a29048e3bc2/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
• Carries weight in society
– May influence patient choice
– May influence a jury!
• Emotive differences need to be addressed
– Patients, families
– Colleagues – even if professionally irrelevant
Distinction Acts v. Omissions Still
Carries Impact
64