thinking about health policy: an economist’s perspective victor r. fuchs stanford university...

23
THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Upload: miriam-spake

Post on 14-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY:An Economist’s Perspective

Victor R. FuchsStanford University

Kalsman Institute23 January 2005

Page 2: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Ten Keys to the Economic Perspective

1. There is no free lunch.

Page 3: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Ten Keys to the Economic Perspective

1. There is no free lunch.

2. There is more than one way to skin a cat.

Page 4: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Ten Keys to the Economic Perspective

1. There is no free lunch.

2. There is more than one way to skin a cat.

3. One man’s (woman’s) meat is another man’s (woman’s) poison.

Page 5: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Ten Keys to the Economic Perspective

1. There is no free lunch.

2. There is more than one way to skin a cat.

3. One man’s (woman’s) meat is another man’s (woman’s) poison.

4. The road not taken.

Page 6: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Ten Keys to the Economic Perspective

1. There is no free lunch.

2. There is more than one way to skin a cat.

3. One man’s (woman’s) meat is another man’s (woman’s) poison.

4. The road not taken.

5. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush (sometimes).

Page 7: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Ten Keys to the Economic Perspective

1. There is no free lunch.

2. There is more than one way to skin a cat.

3. One man’s (woman’s) meat is another man’s (woman’s) poison.

4. The road not taken.

5. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush (sometimes).

6. Nature doesn’t make leaps.

Page 8: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Ten Keys to the Economic Perspective

1. There is no free lunch.

2. There is more than one way to skin a cat.

3. One man’s (woman’s) meat is another man’s (woman’s) poison.

4. The road not taken.

5. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush (sometimes).

6. Nature doesn’t make leaps.

7. You can’t change only one thing.

Page 9: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Ten Keys to the Economic Perspective

1. There is no free lunch.

2. There is more than one way to skin a cat.

3. One man’s (woman’s) meat is another man’s (woman’s) poison.

4. The road not taken.

5. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush (sometimes).

6. Nature doesn’t make leaps.

7. You can’t change only one thing.

8. Heroes (heroines) are born, not made (or is it vice versa).

Page 10: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Ten Keys to the Economic Perspective

1. There is no free lunch.

2. There is more than one way to skin a cat.

3. One man’s (woman’s) meat is another man’s (woman’s) poison.

4. The road not taken.

5. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush (sometimes).

6. Nature doesn’t make leaps.

7. You can’t change only one thing.

8. Heroes (heroines) are born, not made (or is it vice versa).

9. No man (woman) is an island.

Page 11: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Ten Keys to the Economic Perspective

1. There is no free lunch.

2. There is more than one way to skin a cat.

3. One man’s (woman’s) meat is another man’s (woman’s) poison.

4. The road not taken.

5. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush (sometimes).

6. Nature doesn’t make leaps.

7. You can’t change only one thing.

8. Heroes (heroines) are born, not made (or is it vice versa).

9. No man (woman) is an island.

10. If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will get you there.

Page 12: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY

ECONOMICSConcepts

Data

OTHERDISCIPLINES

ANALYSIS

VALUESGOALS

INTERESTS

POLICY

Page 13: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

The need to choose, to sacrifice some ultimate values to others, turns out to be permanent characteristic of the human predicament.

Isaiah Berlin

Page 14: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Fundamental Health Policy Issues(To be discussed during breakouts)

1. Individual responsibility vs. Social responsibility

Page 15: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Fundamental Health Policy Issues(To be discussed during breakouts)

1. Individual responsibility vs. Social responsibility

2. Autonomy vs. Societal control

Page 16: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Fundamental Health Policy Issues(To be discussed during breakouts)

1. Individual responsibility vs. Social responsibility

2. Autonomy vs. Societal control

3. Today vs. Tomorrow

Page 17: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Fundamental Health Policy Issues(To be discussed during breakouts)

1. Individual responsibility vs. Social responsibility

2. Autonomy vs. Societal control

3. Today vs. Tomorrow

4. Should benefit-cost calculations influence the delivery of care? If so, how should benefits be calculated?

Page 18: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Fundamental Health Policy Issues(To be discussed during breakouts)

1. Individual responsibility vs. Social responsibility

2. Autonomy vs. Societal control

3. Today vs. Tomorrow

4. Should benefit-cost calculations influence the delivery of care? If so, how should benefits be calculated?

5. How egalitarian should access to health care be?

Page 19: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Fundamental Health Policy Issues(To be discussed during breakouts)

1. Individual responsibility vs. Social responsibility

2. Autonomy vs. Societal control

3. Today vs. Tomorrow

4. Should benefit-cost calculations influence the delivery of care? If so, how should benefits be calculated?

5. How egalitarian should access to health care be?

6. How should people pay for health care: Taxes? Premiums? Lower wages? Fee-for-service?

Page 20: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Fundamental Health Policy Issues(To be discussed during breakouts)

1. Individual responsibility vs. Social responsibility

2. Autonomy vs. Societal control

3. Today vs. Tomorrow

4. Should benefit-cost calculations influence the delivery of care? If so, how should benefits be calculated?

5. How egalitarian should access to health care be?

6. How should people pay for health care: Taxes? Premiums? Lower wages? Fee-for-service?

7. How should health care be controlled? Exchange system (Market competition)

Threat system (Government regulation)

Integrative system (Professional norms)

Page 21: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

Proposals For Reform of Health Care Finance

• Incremental reform

- Mandates on individuals, firms, or insurance companies

- Subsidies to individuals or firms

- Higher income levels for means-tested public insurance

- Lower age levels for Medicare

- Consumer directed approaches e.g. medical savings accounts

• Major reform

- Comprehensive mandates with extensive, explicit subsidies

- Single Payer

- Social insurance combined with market elements

Page 22: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

True or False

1. Employers who provide health insurance pass on all or most of the cost to employees in lower wages or to consumers in higher prices.

2. Expenditures of Medicare plus Medicaid are larger than defense expenditures.

3. Drug industry profits account for at least 8 percent of U.S. health care expenditures.

4. An American who has a heart attack is more than twice as likely as a Canadian with a heart attack to have an angiogram, angioplasty or bypass surgery.

5. Between 25 and 30 percent of all Medicare expenditures are incurred during patients’ last year of life.

Page 23: THINKING ABOUT HEALTH POLICY: An Economist’s Perspective Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University Kalsman Institute 23 January 2005

True or False (continued)

6. If the uninsured had health insurance their use of medical care would at least double.

7. The net income (after practice expenses) of physicians accounts for at least 20 percent of health care expenditures.

8. The increase in the 5-year survival rate from breast cancer between 1980 and 2000 shows that more emphasis on early detection had a favorable effect on female life expectancy.

9. Greater use of screening tests and periodic check-ups would lower health care expenditures in the long run.

10. Per capita health care expenditures in the U.S. are more than double the average of France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom.