this document has been reproduced from microfiche. … · 2013-08-31 · koo= p! }t et ic photogwe...

41
N O T I C E THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT CERTAIN PORTIONS ARE ILLEGIBLE, IT IS BEING RELEASED IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19820007134 2020-04-29T05:40:11+00:00Z

Upload: others

Post on 27-Apr-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

N O T I C E

THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT

CERTAIN PORTIONS ARE ILLEGIBLE, IT IS BEING RELEASED IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE AS MUCH

INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19820007134 2020-04-29T05:40:11+00:00Z

Page 2: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

NASA TECHNICALMEMORANDUM

NASA T14-82449(NASA-tit-82489) KOHOU?BR, PHOTOBXTSIC 282-15007P402061APRI UP.ERIBINT (5233) Final Report(6181) 35 p BC ,031BY A01 CSCL 038

UaclaaG3/91 08578

KOHOUTEK PHOTOMETRIC PHOTOGRAPHY EKPERIMENT 6233?FINAL REPORT

C. A. Lundquist and P. D. Craven

Space Sciences Laboratory ^23Q5A

► ^ yO lh' ok 4r is pO wV^ ti

October 1981

NASA

George C. Marshall Space Flight CenterMarshall Space Flight Center, Alabama

WFC • /em 31" (Row Jww 1971)

Page 3: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

1 ' W- _ - -

NASA T*.UWIL WARCHMEWWWAAM A&

4. TiTIA Apo IVW" L1t s. a^GAVIROctober 1 1

Ilk

i^tehi Pho etric Photography Experiment (5233) •.

Cftg

fina l ReportV. err t - -

C. A. Lvnftist and P. D. Cram& PHMQRMlft OWPOISAM&M1 VPM T

[a.pv0sa ri n OR A1MUVOW son *M A1WS" wow ow MO.

George C. Marshall Space Flight Center I I. COW MA" OR sun *,liarshal l Space Flight Center, Al abwr 312

S. TVM QV MM WV ;US

i:. 8000401106 A4MCY MAW MO AAQq MTechnical Nemoraafw

National Aeronautics and Space AdivinistrationWashington, O.C. 20546 14. SPOI!#O111MM AGENCY

1s. 8WftR MSI MV mom

Prepared by Space Sciences laboratory, Science and Engineering DirectorateI& ABSTRACT

This report presents the final results of the Skylab 4 experiment S233,Kohoutek Photometric Photography Experiment, which undertook is series of visiblelight photographs suitable for photometry and for a photographic history of CometKohoutek, The report explains the experiment c_crcept, the data reduction Method,and the results obtained.

t

fz

17, K" WORDS is, OISTRIMUTION STATEMENT

Comets Unclassified — Unlimited

Kohoutek

Photometric brightnessComet photography

?OAJ.It. SECURITY C1 .ASStF . td V+NM1 :O, SECURITY CLASH ►. M tus PW) 3). No. OF PAGES 7=, P111CS

1Unclassified Unclassified 35 1 NTIS. ••^ — - • •• • s"^ ,••• • .. •, r1i p ftue" 7 Mhn" IAPolMgiM Mwdm SINN. YMSIW 331 5 1

Page 4: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

file

I. EXPERItENT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION ................................ 1

II. PHOTOGRAPH STATISTICS ........................................... 2

III. COMA WMITUDE ........, .......................................... 13

IV. COMET TAIL ON DECENBER 22 4100 .... . .........................0.041.. 17

V. CALIBRATION OF MAGNITUOE ........................................ 22

VI. VIGNETTING .................... .....a ........ a ... a ... a ...... a.... 25

REFERENCES ............................................................ 30

1 ,

iii

Page 5: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

Figure No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

LIST Of ILLUSTRATI0NS

Title Page

Comparison of 5233 results with the best-fit curvesdeveloped by Deutschmann for ground-basedobservation data ....................................... 1$

Comparison of 5233 results with the best-fit curvesof Kleine and Kohoutek ................................. 19

Comet Kohoutek in" from frame 6889 ................... 20

Digital representation from frame 6889 of the exposurevalues in the comet image after correcting for back-ground and vignetting effects .......................... 21

Density histogram for frame 6946 (Marshall scan) ....... 24

Reference stars and best-fit calibration curve derivedfrom them for frame 6779 ............................... 26

Reference stars and the calibration curve derivedfrom them for frame 6911 ............................... 27

Contours of the intensity pattern caused by vignettingthrough a Nikon lens similar to the one used forComet Kohoutek photography from Skylab ................. 28

. ,

LIST OF TABLES

Table No. Title Page

1 Exposure Sequences ..................................... 2

2 Photograph Characteristics ............................. 3

3 Related Data for All the Frames from Which a CometMagnitude Was Obtained ................................. 14

4 Comparison of the Magnitude Obtained from Skylab withthe Best-Fit Data of Deutschmann and Kleine andKohoutek ............................................... 16

iv

Page 6: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233)FIB. EMT

1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION

The Kohoutek Photometric Photography Experit, S233, assigned to theSkylab 4 mission, undertook a series of visible light photographs suitablefor photometry ed for a photogra!=c history of the comet. This concep-tually side experiment evolver, U om a July 3, 1973 0 hM Neakpartersrequest to the Narshell Space Flight Center and the Johnson Space Centerfor an assessment of a program of Comet Kobe" observations utilizingexisting Skylab sensors or other instruments that could be_available intime for Skylab 4. One possible observation identified in response to thisrequest proposed the use of existing cameras to take comet photographsthrough the spacecro rlt windows. These observations were included in a setof new and amended experiments for Skylab 4 accepted by hMSA on October 23,1973. References 1 and 2 provide a sumeary of the various observations ofthe comet from Skylab.

The caoera available for the S233 photography wes a 35-m Nikon camerawith a 55-mm focal length, adjustable focus, f/1.2 tens E33. The field ofview was 36 by 24 degrees, which yields a 1.04 degree per mm image on thephotographic film. This film format seemed appropriate, inasmuch as a longcomet tail was expected. Also, camera pointing was to be accomplishedmanually by the Skylab crew, and an ample field of view was desirable toaccommodate pointing uncertainties.

The film selected was Kodak Plus-X Aerial 3401 on a thin base. Thechoice was made on the basis of availability, resolution, speed, radiationeffects, and other pertinent factors. Four cassettes of 60 exposures percassette were provided for the experiment.

The standard observation sequence adopted is shown in Table I. Theexposures focused at 15 ft produced a slightly out of focus image of thecomet and surrounding star field. This was done to insure that stellarimages to be used for photometric references would not have saturated coreswhich could have precluded accurate photometry. Based on premission tests,it was expected that for a 60-sec exposure focused at 15 ft, the fainteststar recorded would typically be 6-7 magnitude. For a 120-sec exposurefocused at infinity, the faintest star would typically be 9-10 magnitude.This sensitivity was considered adequate for the predicted magnitude of thecomet. These limiting magnitude values were obtained on the flight film.

Page 7: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

ARD OBSERVATION SEQUENCE

60-sec exposure 15-ft focus

120-sec exposure infinity focus

60-sec exposure 15-ft focus

CALIBRATION SEQUENCE

Unexposed

10-sec exposure 15-ft focus

30-sec exposure 15-ft focus

60-sec exposure 15-ft focus

120-sec exposure 15-ft focus

120-sec exposure infinity focus

A calibration sequence of exposures, as shown in Table 1, was per-formed at least once on each roll of film to allow an observational check

of the density-versus-log-exposure curve for the film. Preflight and post-flight standard density step-wedge exposures were added to the film in each

cassette. The density-versus-log-exposure curve used in data analysis came

primarily from the step-wedge images which were added postflight.

The operation plan for the experiment called for a standard observation

sequence every 12 hr when possible during the Skylab 4 mission [4]. Thishad the objective of producing a uniform set of low resolution comet photo-

graphs. If obtained, such a set could serve as a reference record of the

gross changes in the comet appearance and magnitude.

After the successful completion of the Skylab 4 mission, the S233 films

were processed in the photographic laboratories at the Johnson SpaceCenter. The useful photographs were then identified by the investigators

at the Marshall Space Flight Center. Density values for these photographs

were subsequently measured with a microdensitometer at the Johnson Space

Center. These density data are the basic information from which the re-

sults discussed later are derived.

Of course, many details must be handled with care in the course of data

processing and analysis. These detailed topics, such as background cor-

rections and vignetting, are reviewed in the later sections of this report.However, the broad description of the experiment concept and execution

given in this section is sufficient to introduce a discussion of the re-

sults obtained. these are discussed in the next sections. Readers who are

interested specifically in how the results were derived can examine the

later sections.

II. PHOTOGRAPH STATISTICS

Table 2 characterizes each photograph from the four film cassettes

returned from Skylab 4 for the S233 experiment. Thirty-five standard or

^

2

Page 8: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

a►

ao

a+ ^

d ^8 m.5

0 u uw 0^'

W

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N1

0 oHdU O

U 441-4 OV) ^6) nhhhhn h nh h n n nQa 1+ ^O ^D ^D ^D ^D ^D ^O ^D

U W 1n t/'1 tf1

a

w

N N

N ^

LM C wl WN pV41

r- to V-1 Ln Ln C Ln Ln 0 Ln um R Ln

w

u^^ a

v1.40 OOOOOO^OC^000000 0000004 %D^^D^D^^O

Z a1 NSA4H

f" Y P1 e^ en on e+1 m Mf MW h n n n n n n h nHat \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \C * N N N C14 N N N N N

w0 h co N N Mf>4 N N N M1 m m c" MId m M1 en f+1 en fV1 m N1

OOOOTO -+NM fn%Dnooa%o dLn-+NNMIN1MIfnelmMIenelfn 11

u1 Drn% CD0% 0 -4 "Im44ITd -SIT -?I? Y man %nLM knin

I h h h n h h h h h h n h h n h h n n n h h h h h h h h h%D 0%0 %0%0%0%0 %0 %D %D ^D %0 %0 %D %0 %0 %D ^O %0 %D %0%0%0 %D %0%0 %0%0a

rAVNHtHr-rOG

U

x

OHOie

N

r-

Page 9: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

0 s L^ ^ewa04+

U1+ i L t i

A

N N N (14 N N

1

O1.4eN 0000 O O O O 00

UW►-+ O

Nd w ^o ^D ^o .o ^D ^o ^c

d w Ln Lf)da

v -4r ^ s^

We+1 fn

N N N N N N N N N (14

N ^

Uw Ln to C Ln Ln C Ln Ln C v► Ln C v► v1 C to Ln in Ln Ln v1 r. ^n C u-,0,-, .. .., ^r .,.^ .r .r ...-r ...r "4W

u

m °o

1-o ` c000000 000000 °000000000 00a ^O%0N%010NkD %ON ^D%ON%0 %DN^O\-+ t'1^DNN^O NOD

°momzz Fe en

W A A A en e'1 M enF It \ \ \ A A A A0 N e+1 M .-r N N

N C14 N

WO K,^+ W e^•1 en rI e+i en cn r^ifn en eh fnA

1OOo%DAco 7,0 -+Ne^1+7 ^n^G ACDO+O -4 Cl) *Ln%DAC0O^O -eNe'1

In in ^n 'o^D ^D ^D ^D ^C ^O ^D ^O ^D A A A A A A A 0000 00 en* ( A A A A A A A A A h A A A A A r,A A A A A A A A A A A A A

is-a'

bd7C

u

G7v

U

FNamU

x

C,9OFOxa

NIt7aF

Page 10: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

y01 O

sON f^i

E+ w w .

Zp^ ^0!C d

j ,O-I to COU

u ^p cue

3►+ : : s s tb

V4

u^ O

eepp

RU t+~.

N N N N1

Or4 e% O O

^ v°a,H Ov1 u

0!W V1 to Ln Ln Ln Ln V% Un v10J

oGCa.

f"1 M M t"1

N ^^ N N N N N

J.1 W w W W w wU w Ul% O .r 1- kn Un Ln Un Ln r. v's C V) Ln sr Ln tA p VnO V rl .^ rl .-J .mi l .^ ^1 ^I ^I r.l y^ .rJ ^^ y.l ^`d rlw

u

1.40 00 O 0000000000 C C 00 ^ C^Or SON ^D ^DN^D'•^--^en%D s N.p^O N.:

Z w ..F

W M M M M en MF4 r r.

o M M to n

N N N N N

WO o4

co co 0+ v^?+ W en M M M M Md r f1 M M M M M0

ms ^o n00 -1 v1 %D M.1 tn^Dr`wON0 —+ Ne" -4 %0 P\—+C^- w v 0 w 0% cp% ON 0% crt Ch 0%0% 0% Ch00 0000000

* 1 r^ r^r^n 1 t-- r- nr-r`r-r` r+ r`r` w

lim loo

O www w oDw.D ^D ^D ^D .D ^D .D o ^D ^o .D .D ^D ^D .D ^o ^D ^D .D .D ^D ^o ^Da%C a

.d

017OrlNCG7

WUHH

r+oGWHU

FO

a

N

WamdF

Page 11: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

F

3a ^

mm m

N N N N N N N N N

1Z

.r .r

..i ...OH ^.

b

0!Uita. co 00 00 00 00 00 0C+-! Ot!7 L n n h nrJ:

wV u'i In u1 u1 trli !n en in u1 w !n VI v1tx

ttien

N

to ^a v w w w w w w w w wU w C u1 C Ln Lm C u ,% Ln C !n C u1 Ln C Ln C. !n Lr% C !n u, CLL.

Uwa5 m

HO OOG?OC ^C: O O OgOOf" OjC .00Ca. V CJ 'T nt va N -0 Jc .O N W 'n N .O %0 N

OF W HF

N N N N M N N - •f

Q ..r .r N ^1 ^n .^ .r hd Y^ e+1 e"1 eh e'^') t+'1 M e'1 M M

^(ha0 4 Ln 0 r• e0 C% 0 ►- 00 ON 0 -r ^4 en 7 Ln

W .r O ^r .r .r ..y ... r...r .r ...r --^ N N N C ! ^ ! i J N ef1 F^• 1 Op c0 dD c0 00 00 00 a0 CO cb a0 a0 W aC ^^ a0 c0 cp 00 c0 c0 00 a0 a0 c0 cA

%0 lb .O J? .0 .O %0 .o %0 %0 .^ .c .o .O %0 10 ID .r 10 1a ,a .ra.O

hb

.auC

v

NU

Frn►ramFU

S

NOa

N

..a

F

Page 12: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

a7CuCcgv

NvHit

►r

F

pU^d

S

FO

NWa

F

1

wNJp ..^ w

w b M wtoNz

a O

m °e^O

^ as

0^ bu N a

u ^ B ^ CS O

1N N^

~

2 ^ ^O

^o^ o^ ON o^ o^ o+ a

Cad QD w w w www www aoao aom COOO aoO

to u nthd ►+ ^D

aw in v, inaaCv ^

w M M MN N N

tUW v1 u C in in C .n t' :n u, ^ ul^ in c' in u, C u1 M C uti C U1

4.

1a^ V

d 5 aaD

Go v cccococo000^000000000^ooW^4

M M M M M "^ e"NW ►^ f^ n n n n r,d # M M ^7 ^D ^O ^^ r.

N N N .V N r J c`J

Oco 4 Q r. ^/

d i+ M M M r^ M M MQ

#

go%Dr^coO` O.rM1 00 Op ^ ep

In,

GO

M .t un+ cryU1 U'%—i

aC a0 Op CQ eye tq aD d0 ap 00 a0

cow " M

U1 v1i ap op

4inaD

01 %DP^w0^O-+U1 Y1 LM L1 inCp e0 Cp Ep 00 aD ap

Page 13: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

.r toO

to

C

w uw ^0 81

y. t t 1r t t::

Q ^ ^,t.

CRuyep+mo q ^ w m^ U

t

N N N N

O

bN UU. OD W 00 co OD OD OD OC OD OO Op Q 00 ^ a0 Op 00 OO OO 0.1 00N ON u n n t` t` r\

b ^O4!wd

r.3 av

Uuu. M1 C rn rn L^ MY rn C 6m tr to rn Ln u1 M49 C V1 V. rn u1 tr rn Ln0 ^„/ r yd 4 r w4 r ..r .r r/ r y4 r .r1 r r ..r r .+ti

r,dm r,

Go v 000 $ ^o1 ^e -:1C)"I C, ^00000%D C4 S r-+chf>rin;.f` f'1 '^DC4ID%D

w ..F

fnW n r. f^ i-. r^

^^t t• 4D (T. c7 ..w N

.^ .-+ -+ N 'V N N

N.r

N.r

Nr

c 'J r^ Nr .. r

a+ tip to {n J1 ^n V1 sn!n fn M !'^'1 rn c•'► ^+'^

Q

^►tODwNf" 4 ul^0 ODW -• W %D K. %D "D tiC ^D ►^ t` r. n 1^ n n n P^ n W aD a< a0 00 ao ao OO op

^t OD1 OD tb OD 00 aD OO 00 OD 00 '^ 00 00 00 ^ dp Op 00 00 00 Cl1 00 O'? 00 t1C OD ^7 %0 %O .D %C %V %D %D %D %C %0 %0 .D %D %0 ^C %0 %O .v .fl .v .A %D .0 Ir .Da

W N!

d7t:upCUv

U

F

F^U

OF0

Q.

N

.a

F

Page 14: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

r,.d

L7QyrY

vNVMdFHam

G

1^c o 0w

an •a+ 'C : w C : : r c

O

C N;J • ^ r r^ C C De ud ^^

8 ww o^V Cn ra go z

N -d N NtV N NN1

OH ^ nO^ O^ T 0% <T

rUi U

► .J O eo OD oDnty!J aJ

< wWG^ V1 in V1 Ln MY V1 V1 V1 V1d.,^a

a a a

M M en MMMMMNr+

N N.r ^1

Nr

N C's N N N..A r w..l .r rr

iJ ♦ W W Ww C C Lm in V1 V1 V1 V9 mn V1 V1 .n V1 in in LIN C V) C V1

V

O^

%OQ (^ Q Q Q Q Q Q

%V%0 S ^O S 2 2 S s S ^O v. ^D ^O ^D N ^O %D N

F

M M M M M M Mw n n n n n n aEr ^t ^ s \ \ \ \ \ a n^ it N N M Jh ^Y a .n n \D N N l"`. N N N N \ O

N N N N N N N \ \

',►. W^D ^O n n co a* 0^VIN V1 Wn V1 V1 V1 Ln co

OO.re ^+

f3

M M M M M M fn

1 100 0^000 Cp -• Nah a ^n%D n co Q% Na0O%D

S -+ ^n n ayO^O^N

-• ao O^ O^ O^ O^ O^ O^ O^ G+ O^ O^ 0000-000 C)1 w aD co Go co o Oo Go Go OG OD 0% 0%0%0%0% 1 O% 0% 0% to 0% O% A A

^O .6 ^O ^D ^D ^D O ^O O ^O ND %0%0%0%0 %D 'D %O 'G %O %D 'D "Da a

N

Q7JJt^tF

Page 15: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

b

0 d aw u v Qj

° w: dto 3 y:

)w

ooo •^

a, u r4U O ^C ° c0 C

:WI.i 6 ^+ .G 41 e1^p+

40 wU O pa.

N N N N N N N N N1

O _H O1

U OUU. 00 00 00 00 00 O0 00 00 00 00 co 00^-+ OCrn

dw Ln Ln V"^ v) Ln Ln LM Ln Lr) W) W) Ln Ln4i

Cs.M

N N

u wwt+ w w w wU w Ln 0 0 C u1 Ln LM Ln Ln Ln C u1 to C Ln Ln C to ul) to C Ln

w

uoa m

^o `, °000000000000000 COO 000gyp+ ^ON^ON 1^0%0N%0%0 N%^O%.0 ^D 1,0

Z W .,H

W .t T .t ^T d ^7 .7Er ^t r` n ^ ^ ^ r` t\

O O ^y N M

rl r.. rl ^1 ..1 . N ^

V.1O fY,

6 Q .r N M

d i+A

i

CO M .Y v1 %0 ^ 00 a, 0 c" ? LA D r, W all 0 -4 en Ln %O r-'-+ —4 —4 •+ -+^"NNNNNN NNN NMMMe"'1Mmmm

it 1 ON 0% m m 0% 0% O% 0` OA m 0% O+ 0• m 0% 0% 0% m ON 0% OA m C% O, m ID %n ID .0 %0 %0 %D .0 %0 %D %D %0 ^o ^o ^D ^o .0 ^D ^o .° %0

ISO

nVW7C

u

Uv

U

F

awHU

x

C.^OHOxa

NwamdH

10

Page 16: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

f

,^C.4

odoeao:^^

NE

O

Hp,

u

Q►

_ C1

ww

1 )g

Oo

8 u

e0 aC

ox as

►°,• 7

to

w

mL .n

1N N N N N N N N

O►-^ n O OF Gl --^ ^-+

OVt-4 V

H Och 4-) n n nWd w 10 %0 .D ID

d awdv ^

tL

N

CLn 44u1Uw Lnu'i q r- LM Ln Ln Ln C V1 Cen 0ul,fa.

ua^

m °O

vN O co 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`^0.^ gp ao 00np N^D t^1 ^+ \ NNNNNNNN

W NF

O O O \ \ \ \ \cn m N M .1 -1 v1.r ..r N N N C14 N

WO pGd O O .t in en cD

y+ W t+'1 e•1 c+en

1 c.) en c1 rnd >+A

saCOW0%O r4 r" v1^De` Wa%0 ^+Ne+1-1 Ln ^DP- aD+-+ P'9 en I J J d ^t d ^, %a 't d v1 VN v1 v1 v1 v1 v1 v1 v1

*

1 as m 0% o^ v% 0% a^ as ON v% O, a 7% 0 a0 a^ a^ 0% 0% O^ a% 0%^t%D1O%01D %Ds.D1D % ^DI'D%0%D %D^o ^O%0^D^D^D^D..1

nb

C

U

yVFyHa

x

FOxa

N

W.7dF

11

Page 17: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

bdb

Vc

SNUNENHab1F

xUU

a

N

aq

H

w

Sv

O

6E

W

^ N

m aN C N

k ^'^ v

VA 0

1 •

Id d) N +dr

X ^OA 8xd^aac > v

OD 4 eb w q1 tl a w

m •+ ovo dm mm

x

^ w U >.

i! O ^ C ^pp

m N

a

UM w b-0 O y

>C C .r 4j

IM y

^ C

a .11 O NN r+

► N 41o ev m ^ B

m ) C U U

A m a1 a -4 C?0 A ^.§

a^ a^ b Ol

C 0 0 m w [i

as aU

A0

4J O

w O C

O m .^

C C m b m y4 w m

or m m m ^+ O

0AaId m+ce

« « I«

N

a

e

x

wO

a

ww

xv.^

cv

Ny

3o

>ON

C r1 C

41•3

md >.

w0

bw

—4 ip 41

OU1

4d

tl

mwO w

.roi

►+

U

>, c

t^^p41

aO+

C-+

mt; w

01w H

.w+

bOwi

W ai

=Tw

OI

qbq+8 b

w

.^i>

c O 0C

U^ ^ --4

wC

.r-1 E .a -+

-,4w

c^o

U T>r

O.a

bE w

Oo

U

Ol

Q^

b

.4b

m a U y 'O C.i Ol..d`4

C bC.

-.4

^pw

Q)

U

dI^►+ m ^p N

ail

CC

U

MO

W^ 4„

.-a^4

4m

LL

w ,ate'

Wm

C^4

ON

a ww

opw

f], wA

wC

v

e ^O

u

.4(34w

a^ v ° N aUi .ai w u sm+ 41 01 O -4

c a toNti

.r .N

.

f+1

.

d'

.

Mf

.

ll^

.

t` ^ O^

.

O

r

.

^r.

Page 18: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

Mr~

ORiGINAL PAGE IS

OF POOR QUALITY

calibration sequences recorded the comet successfully. Typically, the

Skylab attitude was being held inertially fixed during these exposures.

This distribution fell short of the goal of a sequence every half day

?g but, nevertheless, provided some interesting observations. The successful

' observations after perihelion were especially scant. When attemptedi1

sequences failed, the apparent reason is given in Table 2. The table indi-

cates with an underline which photographs were measured and analyzed. Most

of these were focused frames. This choice followed from the postflight

recognition that the comet did not become as bright as predicted during the

preflight planning, and saturation of the cores of stellar images was not a

significant problem. Use of the focused images gave a larger number of

` stars for reference and better signal-to-background ratios. When more than

I

one photograph in an observation sequence had comet images, only the best

frames were completely analyzed.

III. COMA MAGNITUDE

One result from the Comet Kohoutek photographs is a small sequence of

visible light measurements of the stellar magnitude of the comet coma. The

interesting topic that r ► ic3ht he addressed from these measurements is themanner in which the cola mndgnitude increases as the comet approaches the

Sun and decreases as the c":iot recedes. Conventionally, such data are

reduced to a constant Earth-comet distance (1 AU) and plotted versus the

log of comet heliocentric distance in astronomical units. When so dis-

played, the pre- and postperihelion curves may show a systematic displace-

ment for equal heliocentric distances.

Table 3 gives the result., of a final reduction of the successful 5233

observations. Except for the Nosorvations on Dore, ►her 2?, the data wereprocessed using digital compu'•., ►- .:r'es developed ii connection with theS233 experiment but designed to hdve Broader appl ico))i 1 ity to suhsedue,,it

problems of a similar nature [5].

One column in Table 3 gives the number of referew.e stars selected for

each frame to derive a calibration curve of stellar m;Jnitwle versus the

log of the summed image exposure. Visual stellar -magnitudes from the SAO

Star Catalog [6] were used, and stars selected were 1 4 1ri!.0 to spectral

classes F, G, and K. These choices correspond closest "o the expected

spectra of the comet and to the spectral response of the film-window-lens

system used to record the photographs. The magnit!uie-versus-log-exposure

curve then allowed a determination of the comet magnitude from the summed

exposure of the comet image. Table 3 also gives the magnitude range of

reference stars. In all but three instances, the comet magnitude was an

interpolation from the reference curve. For frames 6889, 6890, and 6916,

r extrapolation was necessary. Frame 6916 also had the lowest number of

reference stars; therefore, the determined comet magnitude is somewhat less

reliable for this case than for the other frames.

13

Page 19: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

H^ NL^ ^! W O^ 1C N N O^ 10 N ^ 0^ m P'1 M r

d K

^n^n v v ^n ^n a •a, ,n .a o o a M .p

www^o

F ^

N ^p ^p M O^ ^O N r to N

^O 10 to an U1 1n M1 U1 1n a ^ ^ M N ^D

{V p1 O '^i H r •' 1p M O V a N N m O %0h h h a; h m m m m r r h m1 1

CID1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1H'yyy ^ ^ RI m N m m m M N M N m m O m 1n

U' J Q a N 4 M N N N M 'Q M M M M M M ^}

%D OD N min

M V' n ON V N %D O% O r U1VJ p Hh1 ^

5

N v N n U1 N" M V V M M N N

ak U

U1-4 04

E U o rn h o m m a` r n ^o o v et m o+W [^ v r In m ^0 V' V' N O^ m n Men M N M(^ V1 d e} ^ M M M M M N N ^ ^ ^ m m O

rQ r r .- r r r r .- r r- r ^

UHW

O r

_

.L Z a •' O v V' Oi N O% r m m M D W

ar o r uh Ln N m %O Un

U yQ Q•• 0%• . m m m m r h to N N v v1 OH ^1 $4 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O •-aQwm

ZO

!^ V' V' O N N r' N V' M of M N OV' N M M N N M Cl N M N N M fVO O O O O O O O ^ ^ O O O r' •-

^ zsa

M M M M M M M M M M M M tp V' V^OK r n r n n n r r n n r r n n nPt ^+ \ \ \ IN \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `. \ \

E+ \ 10 r O N N (n U1 U1 M N N N4 Q N N M O O O o O O —

_O ^_Q E \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

r •'r r'r Nr Nr Nr Nr Nr Nr Nr Nr Nr N

O OO +4 .I

^ d ^

­4 at N •- m m o% Ln a n m Iii O% o WD D11 M V %0 %D r r m O O M 0 m CA QI

CI r r n n h n n m m m W m m W ON O+ 0a

Ra %o %o %0 %o %o %V W a ^o %o W

I%o %o %o

14 pd b ^

0►2

OO.

14

Page 20: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

The observations on December 22 (frames 6889 and 6390) required special

treatment. They were taken under difficult circumstances -- only 6 days

before perihelion and 6 days before the cornet's apparent least solar

separation as seen from Earth. From Skylab, the comet rose only 3 min

before the Sun. Under these circumstances, some scattered sunlight from

the Earth's atmosphere on the horizon was illuminating Skylab, even though

the comet was somewhat above the horizon. This illumination scattered off

struts holding the Skylab solar instruments. Because these struts were in

the photographic field not far from the comet, the scattered light resulted

in an appreciable gradient within the background recorded around the comet.

Also, the comet image was near the edge of the photographs. Under these

peculiar circumstances, the computer codes used in the routine analyses

Were inadequate. Instead, the background was modeled in three distinct

regions by a linear function of the row and column coordinates of the

digitized data. This modeled background was subtracted from the comet

data.

In those cases, such as December 22, when an appreciable tail was

photographed, the coma in the tailward direction was treated as a region of

extent corresponding to that occupied by the opposite side of the coma.

That is, for the purpose of coma magnitude determination, the coma was

treated as a symmetric region.

The measured magnitudes from Table 3 can be compared with models of

coma magnitude-versus-heliocentric distance derived by other authors. For

comparison purposes, two typical models are used in Table 4.

The first model is due to Deutschmann [7]. As his preferred model, for

9 heliocentric distance, r, he gives:

Preperihelion

M = 5.95 .r - 0.92

Postperihelion

M = 6.86 ,r - 0.50.

This magnitude is tabulated in Table 4. For comparison with the obser-

ved magnitudes from Table 3, an aperture correction as applied by

Deutschmann must be made. He adopted -0.066 mag cm- 1 for refractors, which

results in a -0.30 magnitude correction for the lens of 4.6-cm aperture

used in the observations here. In Table 4, this correction is applied to

the Table 3 values, and differences between the observations and model are

shown.

Deutschmann also applies an observer correction to the data from each

observer. To examine this possibility for the data in Table 4, the

observations on frames 6PS9 and 6890 were excluded as physically not within

15

Page 21: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

Ea4

E[v

HN

E-43

CD E

^G Ck

^ G

A

p kW FZ k

H

O 7A

WD

A

zH 3

C7 ]C

E

O

OWH

Q

0U

WamE

r ^0 d' •7 N O 10 U1 ON 1+) •- PN

O O ^ ^ O O O O O O ; i O ; 1HD

ao

'iaH p7Z x w O r r CD W 0+

U Hto IA t} e} d^ d' d d M M ^0

p r

a N

OIV04 N ^O r ^ ^ ^ O d' O O O 1U

W u1 V1 ^ d' ^l1 tf1 ^ d' u1 c;' O O ^ M ^D3

U

1i

U

r ^p r M M M ^ O ^0 M r C^ M ^n N

' W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

wHO

7

1 ^1

W W ^1 0 E U

d VICEi EE

H D H O ^ r ^ tD l0 u1 M M 1/1 M M M ul %0

p wU1 d' ^ 't7' ^ d' d' ^t V' M N N ^ ^ ^0

U

^ w

j WD

M W O

E-: ^j .- vi ^o M M 0 w %0 Ln 0 0 If

U1 ^n V' V' V' 'd' V' [1' ^ M O O d' M ^D

d

U3

Dow a[^ UI O •+ d 01 0^ ^D N N O^ ^D N 0 OD M M r

H D Ez h 0 ui LA a LA LA v v v► 4 o o d r+ ^

0 0

N►^ fi

W pwq a M vm CD 0 Ln V r M

Ma M

CD

oON

Pi1

r r Wr r r rr wr 0

ODoOD m W CD O +^ o+ 0^ m

%D %D W %D 0 %D 0 00 0 to

w Z wa_ -- --- z -^._

16

Page 22: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

the model scope (see later discussion). When an observer correction is

derived with the remaining data in Table 4, using the model values as a

reference, the observer correction is approximately ,± 0.1 magnitude, with

the sign depending on whether the questionable value for frame 6916 is

included. Therefore, no observer correction is applied. The small size of

this potential correction can be viewed as a favorable measure of the

analysis methods applied.

Figure 1 illustrates the Deutschmann model and the observations from

Table 4. The questionable value from frame 6916 is not shown.

A second model for comparison is one due to Kleine and Kohoutek [8].

They give:

Preperihelion

M = 5.11 + 6.38 log r

Postperi hel iun

M = 6.63 + 8.92 1 og r

For this model, an aperture correction, -0.037 mag cm- 1 , is specified bythe authors, which results in a -0.11 correction for the 4.6-cm aperture.

The values from this model and observed values corrected for aperture also

are given in Table 4. These are depicted in Figure 2.

The coma magnitudes for frames 6889 and 6870 are probably significantlybrighter than calculated from either model. Other authors have noted that

observations near perihelion were brighter than indicated by the various

models; for example, Jacchia [9].

IV. COMET TAIL ON DECEMBER 22

Two photographs made on December 22 recorded a tail cone 5 degrees

long. The comet image from frame 6889 is reproduced in Figure 3. Near its

end, the image of the tail is lost in the bright background near a dimly

illuminated spacecraft spar. Under more favorable circumstances, a longer

tail might have been detected.

Figure 4 is a digital representation of the exposure of the comet image

above background from frame 6889, after reduction using the appropriate

D-versus-log-E curve and camera vignetting curves as discussed earlier.

The contours in Figure 4 are drawn to show the extent u F the tail and someof the inner portion of the comet. Also shown at the same contour level as

that of the tail are contours of a known set of stars in the field.

The numbers shown in the figure are 100 times the actual exposure

values for each pixel after correcting for vigne t ting and subtracting the

M

17i

Page 23: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

1

2

p 3f-zc^Q

4

5

POST- -PERIHELION

e

$ S233 DATA: O PRE—PERIHELION

O POST—PERIHELION

0

—0.6 —0.5 —0.4 —0.3 —0.2 —0.1 —0.0 0.1

LOG r

Figure 1. Comparison of S233 results with the model developed by Deutschmannfor ground-based observation data.

18

Page 24: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

0 ! ! T

o S233 DATA: O PRE—PERIHELION

O O POST—PERIHELION

1

2

w 3d

ZC7Q2 4

5

POST—PERIHELION.,

6

0

—0.6 —0.5 -0.4 —0.3 —0.2 —0.1 0.0 0.1

LOG r

Figure 2. Comparison of S233 results with the model ofKleine and Kohoutek.

I

19

Page 25: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

pRlC1Nhl. PAGE ISOF POCR QUALRY

Figure 3. Comet Kohoutek image from frame 6889.

20

Page 26: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

RDLDOUT nAW,, Of POOR 0"A' IZYrII/II/ wn I/M1/ aat111 Nag I/e11fa

east M0. NS #1011 CU. sf JOST "a- Ns 1, 101111 6". 9•

M M N 7s N0I of 811111 N 90 N 41 41 60 Is It •4 f• 41 41 41 M 14 I7 It at Is as be to 19 10 is 1• 9 ► s 19 11 2 2 2 f 0 a 14 41 14 1 4 ► 11

N u N M: f0 4s N 66 49 u 90 41 41 so 41 41 w s. 42 22 i1 21 it f0 is it A 84 81 N 1I IC It i• it 1 9 It is If is 11 6 f N a 14 a t t at 1 f f

"lot 46 16 as so To 41 a M fit 49 of 27 14 ill " of 11 St r 12 at 21 Is 11 10 24 11 at 4 IC do at 10 10 3 10 • If 1 f I It

N T1 11 41 81 st T11 49 N 90 N •2 45 4. 41 44 01 it it 11 11 1. 29 11 32 11 11 1 S 1s 11 4 11 II Is 1 10 16 I1 a 16 5 12 Is

94 is TO 49 of 81 M at it u to is 11 41 s9 as 31 14 1 to as 21 U 21 42 l2 Ic Is as 10 to 11 I0 24 It It 1 4 / 1 4

sl N N N N is 49 61 N 14 27 41 60 it If as I1 4 a it 24 24 IT as Is 1 • 16 2 s 1 4 1 1 11 4 1

10 N N N s0 III TI 46 as 49 40 40 fl to as 12 4 21 21 is 41 74 14 lG It 1 la 24 24 1 S f is Is 12 S 21 !! I 1 1 1 I I 1 1s {^

It It M N 19 It 19 22 IQ is Is at as 11 Is is 27 26 1. 11 a is as 7a a , • Is 11 21 24 a s S 11 14 0 1 1 4 ♦ 11 4

11 12 14 as N as 1s as 49 1 10 24 11 to to 21 la 11 f I a is 4 It a0 14 20 11.; t 2 2 2 2 a 2 f s

is is s9 21 31 17 IT Is as is 12 22 14 14 6 11 N 11 Is )0if

83 S 12 Is 11 11 4 1 1( 20 IG 1 16 7 I 6 6 2 a a a

I. 29 Is 1 21 as II Is 86 15 44 as 21 Is as 21 17 I 1I S f 12 a I J 4 14 4 1 9 , 2 •

II 26 1. 1. 1s a! as 9 s f I Is 1 4/ 1 121 t0 11 9 2t 16 1 la 4 11 I I I I a

27 19 22 " is to is II It A i 4 • 14 lG 1 1 6 II 2 t 2 • S 25 4 1 1

16 a4 Io t• is 1 • 9 26 24 • at 12 10 4 4 4 s 21 Ic 7 1 2 2 0 t f 19 IS f If a 14 4 a 1 4 4 4 1 10 1 4 4 4 Is4 6 11 1/ It 10 1 14 is 13 6 2 9 12 a a a 4 4 It 7 211 . t 1 S 2 2 21 24 a 94 4 14 1717 24 at 26 to 6 25 14 Lo 1I 11 9 9 a a 12 1 a a 4 S 6 .• 5 a is Is 5 I. 1 11 14

as It S is a 20 16 11 11 11 It 21 1 20 27 t a 1 . . . . , 11 . 9 12 . • s 1s 5 9 /c 1 a S

14 a 9 12 11 IS I. 11 to 2 t t . ♦ • I • • t • 6 11 • 2

If a • 21 9 9 16 1 4 11 1 11 • • It it S S • a it a 4 Is 11 1 7 1 • 7 I

1 I 10 14 S 1 4 It 11 1 is 1 10 S • 12 a is is 19 4 1 4 It11 1 1 4 as 1 1 , IC 1, / Ic lc

4 I 1 10 2 2 2 1: 4 11 11 • • l6 29 1. IS S 5 0 1s 1 1 4 11 1 1

16 as 7 14 17 5 9 5 12 4 11 t V • 6 1 0 4 7 11t

7 7 10 If 9 11 1 • is 11 5 2 a

a

13

Il 11 ♦ l3 4 4 It 2a IQ !C .4 17 9 •

14 2 1 9 3 t • s 1 1 . 15 4 • 10 14 Jc 14 1 . i. J 3 6 • 9 9 11 is

11 !0 14 9 it it 16 4 14 14 4 2 . 1 a 4 7 10 71 7 7 'i 30 6 , • 16 S 6 •

: • 2 1 a 4 ) ) 11 24 21 14 t1 10 t 5 Ii 17 5 5 Ii 1 1 ♦ 4 ) to it J 2c tl 1

16 11 1c 11 32 as 24 16 4 14, 1 , l0 17 S 2 5 t •

! 4 11 5 11 9 4 15 1 it 1 2 1C 9 1 1 1s 4 4 1 11 14

1 4 10 2 2 1( IS 14 if 13 6 11 17 12 9 [ li 5 11 a a U,

9 S 1 17 a 12 4 a 11 , 1s 2 1 1C 2 2 5 4 l: a 15 , l0 l0 14 ) 10 6 • 13 13 a 6 12 a

22 2 1 1 20 ♦ • 1 2 2 it 25 6 i 16 It 9 i! 2J . 14 10 iJ it 10 9 1 9 12 14

6 1 s 12 20 6 6 1: a • 7 14 7 1 6 I. a

17 I S S 15 1 14 17 t 2 16 1 It 5 5 11 1/ 1 11 11 3/

4 1 1 2 2 1 1 11 19 11 20 1C t i 16 1 5 1.` • Is l 11 4 ♦ 1C 14 4 11

4 4 1 17 17 12 a 11 4 11 14 1 10 14 1 U S n 1S 11 4 4

S is 21 s 12 I ) 11 1 2 10 lC 1 1. 2C It It 1 5 11 11 1$ , • 11 13 13 1• It 2 > t 5

to 9 4 It , 1 1• 14 15 S 1 16 1 t 5 12 It 1S 5 12 li 1

1 17 20 i1 ) 1S 19 ) 1 1 13 It 5 1 a . It 15 tl .1 1 17 14 IT 11 17 1 11 .

6 2 S s 5 1 t 4 4 1 13 i1 5 1 16 1 4 1 11 la 1i . 14 14 11 14) !c 17 1) 11

! u 42 6 1 5 4 a 4 4 0 21 1 , As 2 . 1. Y 5 5 1 a 11 15 1 ♦ 4 It

16 12 1 11 1 19 1 • 10 1 V 5 11 . 4 19 7 3 ii 1! it i 2 12 1 I1 l 1. 11 I1 • 1. 4 ll /

6 16 a 1. 19 2 2. 11 tl 55 4. 16 s n 4 4 4 11 [[ 11 11 It 17 1: 2 11 1 S 5 7 19 1 1 1 1 11 IS 11 1 1 7

13 9 29 24 • 1 1 ! 16 to at i! 14 1 5 5 It t 1. 4 14 11 ! 22 1 s 1 4 1 12 Is 5 1 1 1 •

A 9 12 4 1 CG t 2 4 a 11 4 1 1 1 it f 1 e 1 2 6 1 6 1 1 S t 12 11 14 12 12 1• I

A l0 1 1: 5 17 a 4 ♦ 1 1 5 1 1 4 1 1 14 Is 1 1 6 0 2 1!

2 1 12 21 1 IS 7 .2 i3 1C 1 5 S r . 44 f0 11 IS 6 . 1 1 1 14 3 10 1 1

7 2 2 6 i; 10 S I S ZI 4 Is I 1 3 N i t . S a It 1 .7 11 5 t I • 7 a is 4 Is 1 10 17 21 7 1 1

! 17 is 23 6 1 5 S to 2C 0 4 a 11 IS 11 1V lC 11 7 t It It i5 l7 S lc 15 16 5 S t[ 5 5 5 19 4 4 It 13 12 S 4 14 . LS it 7 I

t, 4 4 20 15 L1 11 11 10 1 1 11 it 12 It a 11 !I 1S It 1 It 14, 1 is l! it 11 <l l] t [J I S 16 It 5 12 4 4 1 1s IS is 1 4

I, It It IC 1 21 11 1 14 It 10 9 it 9 I t 11 11 4 11 46 1. s. 3 la IL !t .0 • 1 1 5 5 15 5 5 a a

S it • 1 , 1 2 S L .t )t a .t I 6 6 11 1 1J 14 .7 11 5 12 15 12 )•

S 11 Is 1 1 16 1 15 14 10 t1 25 S 13 13 v It 11 23 l 1 it 1S I IO 21 i7 is 1• 6 6 Y 1. . • t

$ 9 11 12 12 1 11 11 is S 1 S 1 a t 11 to 7) • t 4 13 3. 9

1 11 it 21 1. It 21 25 4 12 1. ! 111 i LU t 17 • 4 10 1 IS 1 Ic 10 ,

1 11 19 .a 1 6 5 11 1) .1 20 1L 4 It 11 It It 16 1J S i t % 5 1 1 5 4 11 a 11 As 1 4 1• 7 1

7 e • lU 1 • 4 12 1 ) 1 • 4 it as S 1 5 16 17 4 1 it 1• 4 11 4 1 4 1

1 10 11 12 I1 15 1 1J 14 )c : l ll it 21 Le ll / 15 11 1I .5 46 .1 S S 1 1 6 9 II !l 1. 1• n It t 4 sj

11 17 l• S 4 1 • 11 is l4 l• - 1L ♦ 4 1 Y 1 1 I 1L IC 1L 1C 1 10 2• S 9 9 1 S S t S 1 -

6 9 ) 1 16 It to 10 15 4 ♦ 1 iC 1. 1. 1) . 11 . t + 1! is / I" / 6 Y 2 9 S 9 11 i 16

/9 7 s a 1. a 11 C• 1: ./ s + 4 15 ♦ 3 1 1U lc 10 6 7 1 I•

s • ♦ ♦ 7 10 !t al i 5 11 1 • Il 11 a It t 11 IL i' I- 5 5 S i +i 1 It 11 a 111 ) 11 .! t lu 1 7 1 1 16 26

11 1• 11 11 • 4 1C IJ i2 7 - 11 21 ! • t 4 +7 5 . • 12 ll 1 t ♦ ll • l 1+ I1 It i t

26 • n It is 19 • 1• 1 10 ! 6 11 2. 2 11 15 ♦ 1 .< 11 11 [ 9 5 1 4 i1 12 11 1

1. 43 IS 0 1 16 10 S 11 1. 1. 10 • t 6 t 1. It I • IL a 1 i1 1) e 9 Is S t 1. 2 S t 5 15 11 ti

/ j4 / ! 1. S AS 19 1 . 14 1. 11 1 11 10 n S < ♦ 11 • it I a 14 l 11 is , , S V t. 9 1S

>^ .._,,.__>..a. a •_ ^^! f_ f t ai ,».NON a^ ^• • t • aI la 1s 7

Page 27: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

••Ils •/•9 IMN ^/r pOM Q^J^UT FAAI^ •/1N i••i Ismaili

toll_ IUST "Il- •N 11031 CLL • u1 1111T ao" No •

i It • /i 1 1 7 2 7 a 1 4 It ! I S I S s

a 11 f Is 14, 2 2 I • 9 If 1• 11 1 1 1 1 4 1 / 1 2 1 2• 14

at 1 4• 2• 2 1 7 ) 1 1. 4 to2 7 f ) ) i• I• • • U lS • • it i ! is 1• 1 Al / • • 12 9 12 ♦ _

1 • It if 11 • 1 1 l0 If Is 1 1 4 ! 2 S !1 ) 1 ♦ ♦• I 2 2 7

10 l 1 l • 1 I• 2 2 2 I I • ) f ) • • a t 1 2 4 f f 10 •3

1 1 1 1 1 2 • f S t f t II j f 4 7 2 1 t1 21 16

it 7 ! t o •• f 7 f 2 I•• I! f31 1 1 a S I 2 s 2 7 t21 11 j it 11 f f as t0 2 2 it 9 I ) I ) 1 • t t f 21 IS / 11 ) 1 I

1• • 2 t 2 / ) 11 • It ) • 12 3 ) / 1 4 at 4 I 1 1 It It • r • 17 4 • 3 •3'3

I 12 7 ) 19 Is f •! 1 I I 4 1 4 10 It if 2 2 1 ) I• 1 1 21 IO e 2 S

!G 4 11 4 l 1 1 • • 4 1 Is I) 2 2 7 / t It 20 • Is 12 10 t0 7 S •

• l0 1) • 5 1 t 1• a !• f S 5 S a f f " 14 4 3 t S 1 • 4 I !c 10 5 10 S ) 24 -SR2 S f, U •3 1 I 7 Is / a 1. 11 14 11 l ♦

3 1

S ! a 11 a 5 5 1 2 S 2 S f J • / • 4 1 r 1 4 S 1) f 14 • ♦ -'-

l• 2 • 7 ! 2 • • ) a I • 1• J J 12 9 ) 1 4 1 T 7 1 7 1 • 14 1 11 a 1 ► • =t t • l If • • • 1 1 7 ! 1 1 I 1 is

If 11 a • f 1 • t0 l• 9 It • 4

Is I I I 10 1 3 II 7 22 11 13 t 22 1• S S 1 • 1 7 9% 9 1 I. 2G 15 SO 14

4 1 4 4 1 4 11 l• 1 1 7 1 1 1) 22 ! j 2 1 is S a S 4 1 t0 12 1G l0 2

4 It 14 It li 4 1 1 4 It I4 l a 3 I S • 1 1 1 1 1 11 1

S I 1 li 1 11 5 j 2 J 1 2 t 2 • S • 9 • 1 1 is j 4 it IL IC 2 Y ) 111

It Is 1 11 1 5/ 3 I t S !j IJ I ii IC 1 2 14 S 5 4 1 9 12 12 4l

S 2 9 9 5 7 9 to • I 1 S 12 S l 1 1 4 1 1C a - ! 4 14 is 11 1 I J 1 • ♦J I I 12 9) I J S 9 9 1 1 l0 1L l 1C 1• 4 t 11 11 14 11 14 14 t 11 t It • 4 4

It 21 iS 1 • 11 !0 1 2 j I s 1 it tC 14 t S 7

4 4 ! • ) 1 1 11 • 14 1 a S !1 1S S • 1 1 1 tl U 1I f

14 4 4 1 14 1 3G to

1 / 1 ! 1 I1 2 1♦ 2 11 I 11 1. i[ 141 t t l S I 1 11 Is 'J I0 22 is 2 11 / •

11 11 a 1 2. 14 20 • 2 11 14 jv j S I i 12 it to I2 1 4 7 7 Y f

t1 S 11 2 5 2 I t t l! 4 ) • lit I • 110 I 4 4 4 1 11

S f 9 S 2 12 2: • 15 a r • ) 1 is it 4 4 1 1 11 4 s lJ 1• a 14 11 It •

i J a is a S t T 4 1 4 14 11 IC 1J 11 5 1• 5 Y (D 14 11 s 9 t t , 4 23 to 2

1G it It 13 ! IC10 4 Il I l0 1 4 11 1 It 14 1 t 11 14 1 1 21 t1 2 t

♦ IT 1 • 2S l) 7 IC l 12• 1 14 1 l 10 4 1 2 it .0 11 2 a J ) It Y J ri7 /• .• 21 10 4 As I• l0 S S 5 S

It 4 f 11 1 4 4 2. 2J 14 1 14 a • 31 i4 t 1 t T A 11 1 1 1 it

4 t 1 5 is 20 It 14 / 1 a > IS 1 1 ♦ l• s Y 7 1 IT

2 a 2 1s • I: • t S S IS L 1 I1 11 )G 10 • s 14 i 1J! 1 • is 1s 5 • Y 4 IS S ! 1

l S S s 11 S • 2 12 Is 1 1 e • 1! 19 It It 1C I 2 / i 2 . 11 11 J Is 21 J 11 / 4

♦ t 11 ) e S 1C 4to 4 1 1 tj it it 1C 15 ,l

At 11 it 11 11 s s 1. 12 J , 1 1 4 to

11 1. It s e a Is 15 If 16 /9 1 4 l 1 lG it • 17 ll 1 t 11 I7 11 11 5 t 1. 11 / LS • • 1 16 11

,s lL 7 J 1 ♦ 11 T f 1 10 1 17 4 5 1 1) 2 j j I7 11 17 i 1 t 1 S t • s T 4 1 1 S

1 7 1 11 1 4 I 10 1 1 4 IT to tl 11 1 a 1 a 1 1 11 11 a 14 t 3 • 5 1 c l 1 4 It • 1 19 14 ♦

f• 1• 1/! t 21 414 4 5 5 16 S 14 2 l 1 / t SIj• 1324 21 1 J lu 1: • 4 1 • 5 5

/ 1s 4 t A . .1 It S s 11 15 11 1 / 14 i s 15 Is 12 r• 1. a 1 J , it

Ad 1 4 4 It 13 1 $ 5• a 1! 11 1 13 IS It

1 15 19 S 2 r .7 12 S !S la 14 `1 ii • 1 • • 1 1 s s . 4

a j 5 S S 14 S Y 1 14 ) J • 1 21 ! 1 1 n I0is t! 1+ t ♦^1

. 1 I` 1> l 14 /. " iC t , t S s > 11 I •

t IL 5 1G 11 a Is la 1 1 17 19 4 7 . •11I ^, 5 1 1. 11 11 , 4 s t .5 I 1 11 11

14 1 f 11 I 1G 4 4 4 ♦ 1C 10 1 10 l 4 1 1. 1,4 11 a 14 4 s S t li it 1. s ♦ 1. 1. 16

♦ 14 4 1 1 11 1 4 4 14 1 14 1 1 1s 10 It l• a S 11 5 At 10 • •:^1 ♦ 5 1. 1 + • 1 • / T 14 16 • • S

-^ I : 11 11 ♦ 14 it jl al II14 S S 11 S 1 11 s 5 5 s 14 it it 15 .1 21 ! t IS U t 1 t !• 1 1 1 4 1 [ / 1

f t = l ! 15 34 S s • s l/ !s > 2 IS it !• • la 1• It 72 t ♦ 3 lL 4 t l .v ! v •

S + .2 > S 5 l 2 ll IS S t[ t Y • 1 • sa t t t 14 Lr • .1 . .[ 1 1C l: I1 1 a 1 !! 1! • ► ! • t I r • t• 11

2 t 1 t Lt • 12 22 l2 J 1 , • 1 1 • I1 13 1 11 1C • 4 • t 9 1 T

• !C JC • 11 • I a • As I i I I 1r"Al11 4 1 It . [ s r t S v 11 lu 10

20 1 4. 1• 1 2G 11 110 , • l0 10 1 t0 Il 1 1C 14 1 11 . I t It 5 It 11 a S 34 I r 1 1 t 1. S 4 1! 1s 1L ! I

-^ 7 11 1 4 1 I1 1 T It 1 ♦ / 1 11 11 11 1 1 4 • 11 lT .• t t a t S 5 s a It S s Y 1[ 11 I / 4 /G I 4 ) 1 )

f t / t / 1 • / 1 t 1 • 1! ! s tI II ♦0 1• S ll it Il • • • 15 [ It 1 It • ! 1C / 1 [..^—N

1 91 1 1 1• L25 1/ s 1 !1 1s Is a 11 J 17 if :sl SI'. 1` Y 15 I• S Il 1 / 1 l 1 iL .

5 9 • .I S S t ij S 1S 1 r l+ t 1• ! + I • ! 1u t l: s 1 1 f l ) i1 1• 1 l •• 1• 3•

9 i S 1 1 • • l• as • f 11 • • 2O.' • 1• .0 14 .j 1s !7 1L tG it 11 < 1 1 ! 1 s s !S 1 • 1

1) !t It S i 11 jI lG 1 1 1 It1 J U 1 ,r iG 14 + 5 7 f t i . !t li + lu if +

1 1 1 I iJ a to • IO 11 / I .0 .J .• if fG H 11 s . ! 11 5 s • • + !G 130 r S > S 1

11 • . 1 .1 11 . Is 11 / • • / a • • 7 . 14 5 11 ! ! t 11 15 1 • 4 iC IL As I 1

j N. 11 21 11 4 t It 14 it to I• • j a 1. 2• .4 to 1 a Il • 5 1> /> l 13 e 1 Is i GL s 5

f / f • • W 2 41 6 Ii H^N 40 u 64 • as is 2 _..1 1• tJ • 1• la f a 1 ll 1 • 2 t

Page 28: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

••l{• •n• 1•acfl OF rlost •os• ••s loft Ga• III

1 f 2 f )! 1 ) 1 • 14 1 1 t f • • • t at t9 f It a

f t / t• 1• ♦ t ♦ 7 2 f f 1I f 4 • 1 7! 17 f a•

/ f 1• l• i• 1 • • • • 1 10 f f f s f • • 12 f U 1 7 i

I 1 ) I 1 • • 1• • f i • • • • 14 14 1 ) • 1 f

a •• It • It • f 1 t t t f as I i

t • ♦• 1 t t 1-1 to t• • • 7 • S • f • 1 f 2

• 7 l t • f f to f l 1 1 • • 1 7 t f 1 • It t t ) ► t 1

1 t 7 U it 16 t ♦ 11 1 • t 1 11 1. 16 • a 7 to 16 At -

1 f S I • 1 ll ) ) • is 1 7 IJ t 11 1 f • • 9 f II 1 • • • I =

I ► :4 ! ll ) l 1 t 1 f 1 ! t 71 f • • • it if f f • a / • • l2 •

• 1 • it • • 1 • 2 2 2 a i • 1 • f 2 f • to 1 a 14 t 7

I l• 1 1 2 2 to I At to a• 1 11 12 ♦• 2 a f 17 It ♦ At

• I to t : 1 s • I• 14 • • • • • • is J is

to It IU 10 7 f f t• 1 • I 1 f to • it ♦ 2

- 1it 10 s t0 f I t♦ 12 f • • t • • ♦ 10 to • to a 1. 21 11 1 • • 1 12 1 17 1

a • l9 It 14 11 14 1 ♦ 1 • • to is 13 1 It 11 • it 1 • 10 l0 M J 1 f 1 l a.f 14 • • • f a 1• II I It l 11 I • 1 t

- 1 11 • It • t t f 1 1 ♦ • 1 7 t • !t • at • • &J!

14 9 14 • • S 1 14 1 it 1 7 t At 16 • ♦ 1 7 10 Si I

1 1 1 2C if IQ to t! • 1 1 21 IG f 1 1. 14 t t

1 10 It 10 to 2 14 • 1 t t

1 it 7 t0 • l f 1 ) 1 /0 a ) 10 t a f

at 1 a f ) 1. 1. 1. 20 It t I 7 11 14 ♦ 1 lu is Is Il 1 16 •

! • ) v 11 It ♦ 2 i• 16 • 1 9 12 17 !f 7 7 f to Y l= 11 2 • t

!t ! ! / 1 • • 1 f 1 1 3 214 • 1 1 2 ) J 1 • ♦ •

• • • f li t It t• t Is to t f 1 to I. 11 1 1 • at

is i

- i s 11C s a ) a ll I 1 l 1 1 f 1 • t 2 • f f f

1 1 1 it 1) 11 2 • 1 f • S t ♦ • a a

/• U t0 72 It 1 11 2 • 1 • 14 It 1 • • I 1 1 1 a • It 1 • 10 f • •• f I 1 ♦ 1 ♦ J • • 1 ! ASIA f • •

• ♦ 1 1 • • 21 9 14 20

• t 10 I0 2 f 11 It 9 ) • • l • l/ I a a 1 tl • it ad I• • ) ♦ 77 11 S I a 11 ! ) 1 1 It ♦ 1 1 t • 1 12 12 I

1 Ill 11 1 ! e J I < S 1 t 3 U f l 1 •• 14 1 f 1 9 f

A* 111lu • 16 I• 10 f 9 f f f f J 1• t ♦ is 1 1 t 1 7 1 I t f • 11

I 2 11 S I 1 9 it 1• • • ! 7 1 1 f it 1 t IC 30 1 •

f • 7 1 17 9 IJ • • 1 1 is ♦ 1 10 f 11 1 • 11 • I • 2 • 14 11 1 I 1

a1 . 1 • 1 t • IU 2 s 10 it lY 1 I • At 1 2 J l •

- ^ 11 ll f is 11 J 11 / • • t • 1 l ! ) I 7 2 l • t •Il 12 / f • { ♦ IU f a It 1 e • • 11 11 1 • t 1 1 f

1• 1 1 S 1 I i f 1 6 9 1 12 l0 • 11 11

19 Ju • • 14 • to 10 1 • • 1 10 I s I 1 I a i • 11 IQ 1 2 1 • • 14 t• !J 3 5 • 11 lu 12 I I It I t s • • •

t • . J J it 1 11 is 1J I I 1 I l 1 IC 1• a a • Y 11 is 1• It 1 1 J t 1 1 )t / t . I1 • • • U !l 11 • t f

s t • l: i ♦ I 1 1 J 1♦ f f 7 • l/ IC 1 l7 • 1 1 f 1 • 11 !1 • 1• .e / r l f :. • • I > 1• • Y I 1 • 1u 1 10 1 f a • I1 17 7

• 2 1. t• !• f 9 It • 9 t 1 1 • it J II J 1 to l-1 At

I ) l0 1• • o J 1 1 1 J • 1 : IC f 1 I Is 10 • • a I-• t 1 9 1 1 I1 I J l f 1 • t 1• t 1 !

i 1 .0 I Y • o t to If J1 I f s I • 11 1 1 to 11 a A. • / 1 f

f t I J • J• 11 1'] 7 lJ 1 s • 12 f I If 111 I 1! a t e • f 1C If /t I

• i I / • 1• 11 I J • 17 17 f SI II 2 a • 1 t f 1 • • •• • t1 IY t0 • tl I ♦ • 2 . 1: I1 IJ 7 I 2 / t • / l

s t'. 1♦ tl f i 1 11 ! a • 1 • • 1J Is 1. 7 a 1 ! 1 1 I 1 • J . II1 • u ! • ) a i • 11 Y 11 ♦ 1 .. h 11 Lt 1. 1 1 • / II a/ 1 • a it ! I . 1C f 1, • • f ! I f t • 1 1 I J tl

! 1 l 1 1 :1 9 !1 2 11 1 • at 1• 1 2 J f • I 1 to f f fJ 41 /• J J • • i• If I^ I Is . i Y 1 ♦ !1 1 • 1 • 1 Y ! S 10 0

t s :♦ • ! • ♦ 9 J 1 I 2 t a Y ! I t

14 • to t J '. J It it I i • • • f 1 f I 1 1• / • • f9 IV 1 10 I ± 1 • • ♦ • • 1 f t

It I It 11 • J J I • 6 • ) J 1

SJ l J S ! f 10 !• J • 1 S 1 t s •f • 4 I l if t! 1 1 a • ! • 1 11 14 • la • f 1. f • 1

11 • • 2 ► 71 ll ! ! 1 • 1! . 1 1 J t J • 1 S f a • 1 {v

Page 29: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

-ii - 1" -I1 !1 16 It 1 1S 11 -- 17 2f loll 7 9 t 16 i 12 1! li 1. 0-3 13 17 16 4 4 1 4 11 1S 14 14 5 2C 4 4 E Y 7 3 1 3 10 30 10 IL 2 10 24 9 9 9 2 9

6 9 3 2 16 16 16 20 15 4 4 3 1C 18 72 13 2 13 2 8 3 11 16 1 10 2 6 9 2 9 9

19 1 9 8 16 8 11 1 4 IC it i 2 1 4 15 4 3 7 to 10 10 6

B Y 4 4 7 10 18 17 2 5 12 8 4 ll 11 ! lE 6

IC

IC 13 13 S 5 S 2 11 1 Il 11 7 IB 3 11 21 3 7 10 3 ?'

21 16 I1 !l 8 ♦ lC lU 22 2 S ll 27 1 4 e 3 6 17 1 Z S ! 2 r l2 11 8 19 11 ♦ I

26 9 6 11 28 19 4 14 7 10 3 6 l3 25 2 11 15 4 7 22 25 17 5 2 9 5 2 4 12 12

39 43 13 3 2 16 20 5 11 lY 18 30 6 t 6 3 11 5 11 1 4 11 ♦ 1 17 25 6 9 11 S 2 12 T _ B S 13

8 14 7 3 12 5 15 19 1 4 14 14 IC 3 13 20 8 5 2 i 11 4 15 1 6 2h 3 13 13 3 3 5 9

5 8 1 10 13 19 1 1 16 7 1C l7 1] ! t t! S S 2 IS 11 It 14 l0 4 1 6 13 13 13

9 2 2 1 1 26 29 3 12 ! 8 1S 18 26 17 13 3 13 2C 2tl Y 2 5 5 23 21 2 7 6 l3

25 16 20 19 S 32 33 4 4 1 10 6 6 6 2 e tl 1C 1 if 4 It S 11 t 3 f 2 5 Y 19 7 14 I_

4 16 12 1S 23 11 5 1 4 S 6 8 15 1 7 4 1 1 1 S 13 t 3 • 12 J 16 5 IS 2 7 18 7 7 21 7 ♦ 21 16 9 3 9 27 8 2 1 13 10 t 3 2 2 11 15 10 4 r 7 10 10 21 13 9 S S 3 3 6 3 1SS 11 26 13 16 20 6 3 2 12 5 5 5 22 4 7 1 11 2C t 5 i 7 1 13 9 1 1 t 6 8

9 12 S Y 21 13 25 29 3 24 15 3 Y 11 8 11 1 4 7 6 16 1 11 2

1 13 12 6 27 11 11 5 13 4 4 24 3 6 9 2 5 5 E t IQ 1 4 1 4 24 2C 3 6 3 11 2 28 2 21 8 4 10 7 6 6 12 14 17 5 11 16 4 4 4 3 t 13 _ _ 3 3 1 1 2 4 h 1 4 10 12 1 1 I _ 4 33 6 9 12 25 8 11 7 4 4 7 t 12 t 12 24 7 4 15 3 S 14 3 6 3 14 21 tl 17 .'- 10 20 ZC 10 7

14 4 1 4 13 9 6 15 2 2 Y 4 19 10 11 14 5 1C 1 J 4 6 3 14 18 11

1S 1S S 8 7 10 7 9 12 9 12 8 5 1 1 7 t l2 12 3 _ 5 5 2 5 5 2 2 4 2 4 7 7 1C 110 6 3 2 2 11 8 11 10 It t 6 9 12 5 5 20 24 8 _ 7 4 4 1 t 6 1 6 5 13 11

8 11 3 3 3 11 1 1 7 10 I 7 11 ! S 2 8 5 2 7 1 h IL 7 6 1 12 6 11 33 9 15 21 14 7 17 3 12 6 4 13 1 1 3 9 3 v S 5 5 2 2 10

17 20 20 IC 6 16 22 5 15 14 17 14 7 1 7 7 25 12 12 6 12 12 tl 5 11 2C 11 1C 4 13 1C lC 1 7 4 3 12 9 3 6 336 12 6 6 2 15 11 14 1 7 16 4 S ! 6 12 8 E 20 ii 13 10 !0 4 2 1 10 4

3 13 18 11 11 8 4 1C 17 4 3 12 2 2 2 4 13 13 1C 10 19 IC 12 12 24 lE 3 9 6 11 11 5 2

4 7 13 10 13 12 1 5 5 14 1 1 13 3 t 3 tl 17 11 6 2 4 1 7 1 4 4 4 15 125 2 21 21 14 7 10 17 3 3 18 5 2 8 4 7 4 t 15 11 15 9 5 13 1 13 i 2 10

10 23 23 12 12 IS 5 1 1 1 20 1 4 10 13 6 16 6 6 6 5 31 1 2 17 2 1 13 13 1 1 1 t S 3 3 15 15 9 12 11 a 6 0 67 7 4 7 6 1 5 14 17 1 _ t I 5 5 11 5 r 10 4 1 7 1 11

5 2 11 4 1 3 14 12 5 2 2 5 4 4 IC 1S 10 4 15 9 15 IB 15 lE 3 6 11 17 lh 2 16 5 11

9 25 S S 21 17 14 17 29 13 10 13 3 3 12 12 S 18 14 . E 2C 3L 2C 5 7 13 13 1 1 4 1 1 10 21 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 771 4 1 4 7 17 6 19 19 5 5 L♦ f 3 4 IC 4 l 1 S 15 12 11 16 L !l aC h 2 i 1 tl 2 2 1 4

2 2 2 14 1 ! 3 3 6 3 5 21 21 7 4 1 16 It 4 10 _ t 1 6 v 3 6 310 6 15 28 16 8 11 17 1 10 1 1 3 Z, tl 39 It 10 16 7 4 y r 4

22 32 8 1 30 4 13 9 8 5 2 1 4 1C IC 7 S xi 17 3C 6 6 52 35 2e tl 5 2 I-i 6ZC 23 6 tl 1 1 1 9 4 12 9 l6 f 11 5S el i5 4 It 45 it 7 7 1 4 1 1 12 18 16 v 1 3 3 1

21 1 1 7 7 x2 11 2 4 1 1 4 S 17 3C 2L 2t h 7 t 14 a d 5 6 2 5 1 2 Jis 1S 11 7 13 7 16 1 13 10 10 13 1S it F7 18 S 15 S 3 8 6 3 6 6 14 6

r4 12 1 5 2 2 tl 1 1 t 5ZC 14 IC 2 1 9 1 1 4

7 7 6 14 7 13 r 1 1 4 t 6 3 11 5 11 5 c^P 7 1 9 6 6 2 2 13 13 1 1 4 r 1 1 1

♦),E 9 12 14 8 14 1 1 is 12 _ 7 1C 74 7 7 4 3 S 9 15 6 11 5 2 x 1 7 7 12 12 4 6 3 3 11 6 11

6 6 6 5 14 1 4 7 4 4 lr I k 7 7 15 1 27_ 7 7 6 5 11 11 1 4 IC It 7 4 1 4 S 15 3 3 v 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 2

5 5 7 6 S 5 i 2 5 B k 4 9 6 1 r 4 e 1

- 10 10 23 22 9 15 3 5 5 5 5 > 2 7 7 S1 4 17 14 4 3 S 2 5 7 4 7 7 4 3 6 6 1, li c 3 3 14 11

3 5 1 l I0 19 7 x 17 IC e 7 11 T 2t

6 3 2 4 13 IC _ _ S 3 l! 14 3 t 5 h 11 305 11 8 13 7 t 1 11 is 2 i 4 10 4 7 1 30 r 4 1 6 4 l 4 23

6 9 7 14 3 J _ t S 12 11 1 5 0 5 lU 1 IU 14 10 10 IB

3 16 5 11 4 1 13 1 13 it xi ! 1Z t 3 S li 1: v 9 14

11 31 9 6 6 S 15 12 14 5 11 . 1 13 3 iC 1C 12 10

13 20 19 9 5 e 37 it 1C 4 . S S J 5 5 8 8 e 5 5 27

8 21 14 7 1 6 1S 1S t 15 6 2 4 7 4 It 7t 7 4 4 6 v 1 3 15 1S t 1 l at9 9 IB 1 11 14 7 1 l t l2 iC 17 8 19 5 7 7 2 1 5 16 10 10 to

4 3 3 3 8 2 4 f 11 2 1 IO 7 :C J 1 t 1 3 c 3 it ci 8 J I 1 1 8111 7 4 l 1 1 J 3 3 11 27 i 11 17 Z 4 4 IS 4 1 d r 4 1 10 4 7 2 4 It 141 l0 1 1

12 9 6 17 i4 13 IC 7 1 7 1 1 t 1C 6 1 1 l 4 3 .., 26 5 2 5 1 -7 3 3 .i 3 2 1 i 10 1 3 f 1 8 2 5 1 7 15 11 I 11

5 14 4 14 7 1 1 it 5 _ li S 2 2 k 11 5

8 4 v 5 2 2 12\^ ^y^ pFuliLYJUT FRAA& 5 7 4 1 5 B

OF POOR QUAUTY

Page 30: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

1 I 23 s I > 3 16 J4 iA " i"3' ff IV V a -,T-r-vw4 1 11 11 10 1 3 17 1C I 3 3 3 I it 10 18 ♦ l0 10 l 20 2/ 1421 = 30 II 11 2 2 3 11 5 t

12 1l 7 11 4 1 1 4 11 1 11 It 7 ♦ 4 2 8 f 8 2 14 14 5 S 11 3 3 6 12 13 1 4

2 5 6 5 15 37 22 4 2 15 11 21 11 4 8 11 14 If 16 14 ♦ 2 f 1. 24 it 24 l 8 11 8 S IS 15 l 12 6 1 13

3 5 9 li S 15 6 5 1 8 12 2 B S l2 tB 28 18 II /2 3 l7 1S 3 1 1f 12 4 1C 13

13 13 13 3 5 5 3 15 15 11 12 3 9 S 12 S 9 5 29 19 9 12 1 l 12 12 ♦ 13 13

6 13 1 1 ll 1 13 ! 9 3 12 1 t 13 19 9 1 6 i9 1I 13 S 9 13 13 7 S 5 1 1

14 1 1 1 10 13 4 !C 1 10 4 4 13 36 23 7 1C 3 1 1 3 8 3 t 1

1 18 7 1 2 14 11 4 4 2 2 7 14 4 13 13 13 2 14 27 30 5 tl 30 14 3 7 14 8 11 3 8 18 4 i 4 9 4

3 l5 2 7 1 2 5 7 2 11 2 14 21 21 31 31 4 15 2 1

6 8 S 3 21 !1 N 25 14 14 31 i1 15 1 b 1 1 1 4 S 4 _ 1

4 1 lb 4 4 1 ♦ 4 16 6 16 6 16 29 16 9 9 2 1 1 11 4

2 2 1C 17 7 1 11 17 1 l 117 10 20 10 3 3 1 6 3 1 6 4 2 15 3

1 1 4 3 3 1 t 1 1 t t 1 14 3 1 t 1 14 6 1 3 6 35 21 14 21 28 I1 1 I1 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 1

10 20 1C 10 7 7 2C 1 1 1. ♦ i 1S 2 4 7 9 4 IS 2 2 19 36 25 29 32 29 29 12 3 8 3 1 4 6 5 2[ 4

3 l4 18 11 14 5 5 3 5 11 6 3 1G 10 5 3 d 20 23 13 3 6 4 13 1 6 9 2 4 14 14 11 11 4 5 5 5 3 14 1 1. 1C 6

7 7 /C l 4 15 4 4 6 6 1 4 4 4 S 4 12 17 .1 I1 12 30 41 7 9 12 4 5 1 5 S 5 5 . 3 0 t S 7

S 13 It 10 10 IS 1 1. 2 5 22 13 3 6 5 10 13 19 5 6 13 15 6 L C 9 11 t 14 4 4 1 S 1 3

1 12 6 17 3 6 3 3 b 1 6 4 S 3 14 14 3 6 S 6 1[ 1! t 4 4 26 20 11 11 14 7 1 2C 1 9 14 1 8 ! t ! 15 11 f 13 4

10 18 7 18 12 7 10 2 4 1 2 1 1 7 17 2 7 i 15 7 24 24 10 30 10 3 5 3 8 5 6 4 2 2 1 S . 5 i

3 a 3 f 8 - 11 21 1I 16 13 6 t2 13 l6 4 13 16 ! 8 9 6 6 9 4 2 2 3 1 1 L1 17 8

10 4 1 7 9 S 15 S 4 4 4 7 , S 4 2 7 14 14 3 23 1 ♦ 23 30 30 1 + 3 6 1 5 i S

5 2 n 8 a 1C b 1C . 5 8 13 f 2 H10 1C 21 it 34 34 15 !0 18 18 8 11 11It 1 1 6 11 14 12 2 5 5 15 15 1C 4

4 h 15 12 o S 11 S 1 1 6 It 3 11 11 t 3 1 1 4 13 It 29 ii 2S 42 32 S 12 12 9. 7 7 7 5 5 1 1 S S

1 13 9 2 1U 7 13 1 1 4 1 2 a l: 1C 2 15 I t 4L 31 15 13 13 H13 5 30 13 8 6 l 1 t 14 14 4 11 10 12

tl 6 s 6_ 3 3 8 11 b 1: t 6 13 l It 24 31 1%. 1S 14 11 14 11 1 6 6 4 4 12 11 14 3 3 12 1 3 3 15 13 t 2

4 1 7 1 12 12 17 1 4 4 Ii 15 it 43 32 35 11 12 15 15 17 12 1 1 3 6 6 6 2 . ] = 3

2 It 5 11 5 2 2 c 5 10 5 i 13 8 3 11 16 18 37 23 33 21 8 11 11 1 1 1 6 16 6 S 14 1 4 7 9 2 2 7 7 7 12 5 1 1 4 111

3 3 1 3 5 1 14 H11 4 11 19 19 0 24 11 9 4 5 2 7 2 2 2 2 3 11 1 8 3 20 18 It 4 -

2 4 2 2 13 11 18 7 2 113 18 1 1. 23 23 3S 26 16 31 35 1C(3 18 13 5 10 3 3 13 3 3 4 4 11 7 4 12 S 5 2_ 6

6 3 _ 5 _ 3 14 5 3 3 3 3 3 t 6 19 16 27 36 40 11 14 IS 11 1 4 4 4 4 4 2 15 5 8 1 t 1 2 1

v 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 7 2 9 38 3C 45 28 i3 It i 7 5 5 5 IB 3 1 1 6 6 9 6 14 5 1 1

13 8 la 2 2 5 n .1 1C it it it 21 46 35 16 18 5 6 6 6 I 1 6 6 2 1 3 5 8 2 1

18 9 1 3 3 1 1 11 t 3 1 9 3 11 2t 11 it 27 33 33 40 22 1 6 7 2 12 1 2 7 1 5 8 5 lU 3 8 9 11 9 14 2 3 16

2 2 1 4 !0 1L 7 4 2S :l 1- 23 it

it

15 19 23 26 7 3 5 8 8 3 3 6 6 4 9 6 it 7 3 1 . t 4 It

6 6 14 14 146 b b :S 14 11 _ 1 11 14 3( 49 46 42 4t 14 4 6 2 6^ 2 . 4 S S 1 S 3 1 t 2 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 h 4 1 11 9 15 11 15 17 43 31 23 17 : 10 8 3 ' 8 10 3 1 5 IC 1 3 1 t t

2 10 lU 3 5 IC 1C IC

LC 3 13 2% St 41 35 37 it 3 t 2 2 4 7 3

1 1 1 6 t 14 di i2 2C 28 3L t4 64 J. 33 20 S 9 7 2 1 5 1 l2 IC 3 IC I 1 t 11) __ 1

7 1C 7 IC 1 ] 11 32 43 tt17 54 51 1! 3 1 2 6 1 4 7 5 3 4 4 t 5 4 2

3 11 6 Il 1 3 1 1 3 le 1t 33 tC t7 t7 7C 35 14 1 6 2 9 2 3 4 6 2 4 2 3 _ 4

15 1 1 . 4 4 1 4 2 15 SC SC tt 66 4S 20 2 5 3 3 15 3 3 3 8 8 1 11 4 9 7 lC 1 1 S

3 3 13 3 5 3 3 18 35 51 51 ti is 3i 11 11 t 4 6 4 4 4 12 I1 17 1C 12 3 5 3 4 t 6 4 14 S 3 6

♦ 4 6 1 11 1C 11 4 12 .2 it IC 32 71 t t3 44 2C 14 4 9 5 5 5 5 1 1 14 3 7 5 15 12 t 4 4

1 7 5 515 7 15 5 5 it 1f 35 65 S1 1.7 31 3♦ 19 10 21 13 6 1! t 1 1 2 12 7 5 5 h 4

3 14 11 14 11 11 It i5 11 it 5t 11 12 tt 33 1] 14 9 t 7 14 7 14 5 3 3 t 4 S

7 12 7 2C 26 2S 31 34 11 34 4t 75 9C 1 7 4t 34 37 7 10 2L 3 3 3 3 b t 4 = 1! S 4 2 _ -

5 t 11 3C 1S 1S it 16 21 3tl 57 S8 84 16 41 .1 t ! 6 5 3 11 4 5 t

1 14 15 31 1t s5 2 1. JS a2li5l2!IC3 t5 .2 .i 17 S 2 .0 3 10 6 1 5 8 13 6 1 i . 3 5

IC 1C 31 5, 41 56 6C S ♦ I •,ti4t 94 32 23 It 3 3 1 1 1 1 2 lU 1 2 S It _ 5 _ 3 _

11 11 v v 14 30 61 IS 111181531 illt7132 St 44 3t 1. 7 4 S 7 14 S I 7 l 1 1 4 2 1

12 1C ZS t3 S61CI15CIS7114 S3 61 23 1. 15 13 5 3 5 1 1 3 2 1[ I 2 h 4 1 1 1_ 4 2

5 .1 J6 601^CI5711124121C1US 44 41 27 11 . 14 1 4 i 1 2 1 3 tl 11 It . 3 IC lC 3 3

U :5 t 1 l 25 41 t t5.1431635.117 91 39 31 17 1C 41q1. 1 12 12 5 1C 5 1 16 9 3 4 6 1 1_

1 5 It LC 1C It ':CC/SB4C34tlJtSlfS 8S 31 It 3 13 ET, 8 6 9 11 I 4 9 1 5 1 6 lO 1 1C v 4 16 It 4 5 5 55 2 1 t t 15 12 t 3 5

11

18 1C

1 1 1

0 l b 4b 412484).546473147 9C !3 15

iIl 12CJ1t t14-112Sf13! 54 31 2t

li i i 2 1 3 17 10 I5 10 3 6 2 4 4 4 11 2 4

1 3 1 5 1 4 2 4 19 6 5 3 1 3 5

t 5

4

16

8

1t

6 2

1S I

3 7

6 t

11 1 5 7 It

1 71 S

21 6 t=

5 16

1 S

14

S

2 11 9724;4514 14156 Sl 51 42 26 -S 4 4 ♦ v 3 1 S 5 3 5 10 5 lU . t 11 t _ 9 7 5

5 . 7 15 1: 1 1^ lU 32 Ot1.4127143 13 63 it 15 f 3 1 1 1 6 1 1 13 IC 15 15 4 2 11 11 11 2 11 3 16 12 16 10 14 4 4 LC It t n S 11 1 1 11 13

1 2 t 11 5 11 2.' 21 3c 21 l I1 1! S 4 41 2 3 1 S J l 5 4 2 It 4 It 21 1S 9 I 1 12 4 6 2 6 9 It 7 I S It 4 Lv 3

1 12 15 18 1 8 h s 11 4 i 1 3 12 5 1 4 13 13 11 1 7 5 14 1 13 13 2 1 5 _ . 11 4 4 4 1 14 lC 31 11 4 is 9

5 6 i5 17 S 4 IC 1 15 15 13 lC 11 it 3 h 4 7. C 16 14 S 14 S I b t t 7 I

M.pou-W FRA. S

Page 31: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

e 12 lS 1 ♦ 4 to 1C 1I 1 2 S S S S 10 16 2 4 1 t l • S •

13 11C 5 5 4 9 3 3 15 1S 1 2 6 4 2 4 2 it 14 • 10 4 5 11 a 6 2

1C 13 3 3 3 It a 6 2 2 7 21 12 S 1 l 4 2 11 2 1 1 3 t 3 4 S 1 S S 6 4 2 to

13 13 1 14 It 5 3 3

10 4 2 a IS 4 IC 1 5 5 S 5 14 6 9

S _ 1 1 Z S 5 7 5 1 7 6 8 3 9 17 17 3 2 4 4 12 8 5 1 1

- 3 b 3 t 1 2 12 1 < S 9 3 a 1 2 4 3 3 1 t 2 6 • 1 1 9 18 t

a 4 < 4 y 4 - 3 1 l a 1 2 2 3 5 2. 7 S S 6 7 7 S

2 1 6 6 9 6 1 2 7 7 3 3 12 6 6 4 1 5 6 a 12

-. 4 1 < 2 3 5 3 3 6 4 3 6 a 4 610 7

1 11 4 3 7 3 1 1 2 4 3 5 1 6 10 4 d a Y 3 3 3 10

i 15 3 1 1 3. 4 2 9 3 5 1 1 4 3 1 16 12 1 13 2 4 10 14 5 1

1 4 4 3 7 5 5 4 1 14 14 16 10 2 7 11 l 3

6 S 2 < 4 S 3 3 t 6 t o 2 11 9 1 1 a 4 4 4 a 4 7 12 a 10 11 11 11 13 11 12 t 2 3

1 14 1 It 1C 6 4 3 5 2 4 5 1 6 4 4 4 7 _ 7 1 7 1C 4 12 12 10 4 1 4

S 1 1 5 7 5 1 16 4 0 3 3 0 1C 1 1 S 12 12 10 4 4 1 1 1

S 1 3 4 3 3 7 5 1 6 30 10 9 6 13 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 10 i 11 It 9 11 12

a E 15 Il t 13 4 S S 5 3 5 1C 10 12 It :3 13 2 2 12 12 14 14 12 8 5 1 1 1 2 11 6 21 19 3 1S 3 4 a

2 1 S < , i7 17 6 2 5 7 1 12 IS 13 it 7 3 7 IC 11 a 2 1 7 5 2 4 2 it 17 17 15 S

1 1 15 17 E t 13 11 2 1 3 t 11 la 3 3 5 1 1 1 d 2 2 11 S 3 12 4 a 5 11 13 11 It I

S < S 3 11 I[ 4 ., 6 3 1 3 6 15 6 2 5 5 7 7 3 6 4 7 5 16 4 6 6 4 t S 7 3

S S 15 l5 1C 4 4 2 1 1 1 2 4 1 3 1 4 S 11 la S 1 4 6 4 5 7 2 6 a

1 1 S 5 _ 7 1 1 2 7 7 7 3 4 5 1 5 5 4 6 1S 9 11 5 a 6 4 6 7 9 13 7

10 12 1 6 13 ie 11 3 5 5 2 4 9 5 1 5 7 14 5 6 6 2 t 1 3 12 11 4 a 6 a 5 9 . 3 12 2 1

3 3 13 13 t 2 2 2 5 6 4 9 5 3 1 12 10 2 6 1S 13 3 9 20 7 3 6 8 6 3 , a 14 IC 12 10 I3 23 13

< i 3 3 1 2 2 7 6 6 1 3 3 3 1 6 t 3 9 S 4 2 1 1 9 7 3• 2 a

1 1 h 11 e3 1b 2 3 1 8 4 1 7 14 4 4 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 7 1 9 1 d 27 19 1 7

4 5 5 0 t 2 13 18 6 9 3 S 12 12 8 8 30 4 2 5 5 5 14 1 It 5 4 E A a 1 7 1 9 7 2

- 6 4 4 7 2 5 3 7 7 1 7 9 3 6 17 1C 1 6 t 8 1 17 4 2 2 5 1 t 7

2 7 7 3 k 1 10 8 2 5 10 10 4 6 5 1 I 1 5 11 3 3 8 4 2 2 3 15 1S 5 2 6 6 a

1 4 t 2 4 5 S 1 5 10 10 2 11 11 7 3 12 4 2 1 9 11 1 3 t E 4 ♦ 5 3 6 6 6 3 5 7

2 1 5 5 t t 6 2 4 10 6 7 1 7 3 1 8 4 2 5 3 3 3 4 10 e 5 7 1 1 4 6 7 13 11 7 6 t

2 3 14 t 4 2 i 4 11 9 2 6 8 11 1 5 4 10 4 5 1 . 4 IC 4 7 7 7 a IC 12 6 5 3

3 1 < t 4 11 S .1 1 1 IC 1 1 1 4 5 1 1 S ll 7 3 e 6 Z 7 1S 7 6 4

2 1 1 1 1 1 c t 3 5 5 4 4 3 5 6 2 4 1 1 4 4 1 7 7 7 6 t t 6 10 1 3

1 i 1 t t 7 5 3 14 t 1 4 4 6 4 2 2 4 2 3 6 1C d d t 7 3 2 12 20 7 5 5 9 4 1

t t 1. 4< 1 5 1 2 3 1 4 2 7 9 5 1 4 5 2 9 6 7

-. 10 _ - _ 1 4 _ 2 6 7 9 5 2 10 4 11 15 6 10 1 1 11 13 a 12

6 S 4 [ 2 3 5 1 3 8 2 2 8 6 7 7 7 3 _ 7 11 7 3 2& 10 8 3 9

3 4 t 4 7 11 S 7 14 3 6 2 2 7 9 4 4 7 o B 1 1 9 2 6 2 14 It 11 4 3

7 5 3 12 5 1 1 t lu 11 9 4 5 5 7 1 4 11 9 5 3 6 0 4 2 1 13 1 4 4 11 2 4 1 3 2 17

14_- S 0 1 b . 2 11 5 2 5 7 8 6 6 S 4 2 4 5 1 6

12 t 4 4 5 1 4 9 1 18 12 3 3 4 9 3 14 4 3 3 4 12 2 1 2 1 1 2 1

4 4 1 4 1 11 14 1 15 8 7 13 9 5 6 2 3 7 3 5 S 4 2 16 Ii I f 17 4 2 6 3 16 10 2 1 6 1

t 4 S 7 / 6 2 7 1 1 6 2 3 5 5 4 4 4 2 6 1 7 3 d 16 14 4 7 S

_ 3 4 13 2 4 2 1 1 2 4 3 10 4 4 3 5 5 9 < 1 12 8 . 3 13 5 7 1 2 6 1 5 2

5 c 6 1 7 9 14 1C 6 4 4 1 1 3 5 7 12 12 2 6 5 2 1 1 6 14, 1G a 2 a

13 E 2 < < 3 t a 1C t 2 11 Y 9 5 3 1 3 13 1 5 7 5 5 3 2 7 7 11 14 5 5 4 5 2 10 9 t 6 2

5 - - 4 4 3 5 20 16 1 2 4 6 4 S 12 . 2 1 13 1 1 4 3 5 1 • 5 2 8 7 9 6 3

4 2 i 7 it ll t 4 4 13 5 1 2 5 7 7 6 5 1S 15 4 6 7 IC 7 1 10 17 12 4 4 4 l4

4 1 1 1 [ 4 11 S S 5 5 6 4 2 12 15 1 4 2 a 10 5 3 6 4 20 18 4 11 _ 5 2 11 S 3 5 a S 12 12 11 13

IC ll 3 2 4 15 d 1 7 11 7 7 2 14 10 3 3 9 6 < 1 5 3 3 2 17 17 t a S 7 8 13 a 13 4 9 8 5 2 4 14

1 1 4 43 1 6 8 1 1 4 10 7 10 5 12 4 11 1 3 14 7 6 9 8 11 13 10 4 4 4 6 5 2 4 1 6 6 8

1 e t IS 13 t 3 1 I3 3 22 9 6 1 9 4 6 4 8 1 12 14 5 5 13 19 13 3 10 14 7 a 5 . 3 S 17 16 5 3 2 6

1 11 S 5 16 i4 l4 I4 Y 9 4 14 10 8 2 < 6 4 11 8 1 5 3 7 1S 25 8 3 S 5 6 4 6 5 IC 10 4 1 4 5 12 11 8 5 9

16 21 6 t . S 5 S 5 5 4 14 1^ 3 11 5 4 8 4 1 1 9 2 13 iJ 3 S 4 4 9 19 19 2 9 5 4 1 5 3 7 7 4 13 13 11 8 17 11 11 11

y 7 4 2 1 k 14 18 6 3 1J 5 6 2 8 1 9 5 2 1 6 1 1 t t lC 3 2 4 2 4 7 6 5 8 3 I a IO 9

4 S it 7 1 ii 13 14 4 0 6 i4 12 1 3 7 11 3 9 8 8 10 2 14 12 20 9 13 6 It 4 12 IC S 11 7 4 7 9 10 22 21 12 12 11 9 l3 it 7 19 14 6 6

I I S It 4 A. _ _ S It 7 t It 18 16 19 19 13 15 13 13 12 3 7 16 14 21 19 19 15 10 2 2 13 15 2? I3 23 17 It 24 It 17 21 S it 18 16 it 22 11 12 9 15

-14 IL 12 11 4 15 9 it 12 It 1 15 It 7 3 Y It IJ 10 It 1 16 24 18 2 2 19 28 14 14 10 8 17 15 16 it 2C 17 19 26 it 3C 31 21 21 32 34 29 11 13 If 30 35 35 29

7 6 t t 7 7 21 11 14 S S 21 36 It 21 14 27 43 28 18 13 8 20 23 31 24 16 11 17 38 23 19 30 28 33 21 18 22 2S 23 23 35 35 41 31 Ze 40 36 31 26 32 30 44 43

OR-GINAL PAGE IS OtiT FRAM.fbF POOR QUALIT Y

^DFigure 4. Digital representation from frame 6889 of the exposure values

in the comet image after correcting for background and

vignetting effects. The values shown are 100 times

the actual exposure values.21

Page 32: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

background. To convert to radiance in 10th mag stars/degree 2 , one

should multiply each number by 1.53 x 102 . This value includes the

factor of 100 mentioned previously. (Each pixel covers 6.78 x 10-4

degree2.)

V. CALIBRATION OF MAGNITUDE

The procedure for calculating the comet magnitude from each frame takes

place in four steps. In step 1, the conversion curve from density to

exposure (i.e., the density-to-log-exposure curve) is determined. In step

2, the background exposure around each reference star to be used in the

calibration curve and around the comet is determined. Step 3 consists of

finding the signal (i.e., the sum oft background-corrected exposure

values) for each reference star image. Step 4 is the calibration of the

full frame and the determination of the comet wagnitude. This consists of

fitting a straight line to the reference stars and then calculating the

comet magnitude using this line.

All the densities were measured with the Optronics Spec Scan 3000

microdensitometer at the Johnson Space Center and were recorded in digital

form on magnetic tape. One frame, 6946, also was measured subsequently on

the Perkin-Elmer Micro 10 microdensitometer at the Marshall Space Flight

Center. Data from the Marshall scan for this frame are quoted in this

report, although the difference in the comet magnitude calculated from the

Johnson and Marshall data sets is small. In all cases, a 25-um square

aperture was used to digitize the density readings, and each reading was

separated from its neighbors by 25 um in both the X and Y directions. All

subsequent manipulation of these data uses copies, also on magnetic tape,

of the appropriate frames.

The density to exposure conversion was made using a look-up table.

Each density value was converted to an 8-bit gray scale value. This was a

convenience for working with the IBM 360 and other machines with which the

data reduction was done. A calibrated standard 21-step Kodak step-wedge

image placed or each roll of the film postflight provided the D-log-E curve

frm which the look-up table was generated. These images were placed on

the film using an exposure time of 60 sec.

Since the background varies over the area of a 35-mm frame, a value for

the background exposure was found for the area around each reference star

image and the comet image. This area, A B , was normally a 1500-um square

area centered on the image (star or comet). The background was defined to

be the average exposure value of all the exposures in the area. All the

exposure values used in the average were first corrected for vignetting.

Density values associated with stars or the comet were excluded from the

average by limiting the density values to a band around the mode of the

densities in the area; i.e.,

22

Page 33: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

I E (_ OilEB N

AB

Vij

where Vij • vignetting for i,j point, Dmin :^ Dij ! Omax, and N is theactual number of data points used in the average. Of the 3600 possibledata points in AB , generally more than 75 percent were used to calculate

a background value. Qnin and ;ax were subjectively determined from a

density histogram, such as shown in Figure 5, constructed for each area

AB. The histogram shown in Figure 5 covers densities ranging from 30 to64. For this area, grin and ;ax were chosen to be 36 and 42, respectively.

The total exposure value ET for a given image on a frame was found by

summing all the exposure values, corrected for background and vignetting,in the image. A rectangular area AM around each image is defined as the

image area. These areas are generally, but not always, centered in the

corresponding square area AB used for determining the background. They

also varied in size depending mostly on the magnitude of the object butalso somewhat on its position in the frame. A small area (A M << AB ) isused for the sum in order to reduce the residual error resulting from the

small difference between the true and calculated background and to exclude

signal from other stars and sources. ET is defined as

r E..

ET(Nd = jIl V - EB(AB)ijwhere r = the total number of points in AM,

E the exposure of the point at coordinate point i,j,V = the vignetting value at the point i,j,

i,j the X and Y coordinates of the point,

and ¢ i, a c.;unter for the number of star images. In determining the

signal from the comet, only values from the coma were used. The tail was

excluded from AMC , the comet coma area, by defining the coma as sym-

metric around a line perpendicular to the head-tail direction. The bound-

aries of AMc in the tail direction were chosen to be the same distance

from the coma center as the coma edge opposite the tail.

A calibration curve was defined for each frame using the E T and mag-

nitude of the reference stars in that frame. The reference stars were

identified using the SAO catalogs. The visual magnitudes from the SAO

catalog were used in determining the calibration curve. Stars selected

for reference stars were limited to F, G, and K spectral classes, as noted

in Section III.

The calibration curve for the frame is defined as the least-square fit

of a straight line to all the reference stars using the equation

23

Page 34: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

usSHWOHOWJ

U_

Q2

U7

Ni

CIA$ ^1010^ N^1p^^1^^WP1^-^N^l90^^N^

i i i i i

..............................• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

J

O^ Ny Nto ^

Occ 0

W00 S1

iO SW ~

t3t^^Q OW ZW CyuOi 0 8J Z ^W :E Q_J Z

W W O^^0JO WHQWS¢^e. 3x

N WIr ZOO W W 2OQ m=QOCC Ox Q

Cu-SJZ V. W Z

W W W = ^Oao Z M- 3S J ;

0 ui W0 ON O W m

24

Page 35: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

log ET(AMd - amt + b

where mt is the visual magnitude from the SAO catalog and a,b are constants

determined from the fit.

Figures 6 and 7 are examples of the data and calibration curves. The

comet magnitude is then found by inverting the preceding equation,

log ET(AMC b

me - a - a

The values found from this equation are given in Table 3 as the "measured

magnitude" of the comet. Crosses in Figures 6 and 7 mark the cometmagnitude on the calibration curve as determined from E T for the comet

for frames 6779 and 6911.

A measure of the error in this method can be given by the value of the

root mean square (RMS) of the standard deviations of the reference star

magnitudes from the several calibration curves. That is, the RMS repre-sents standard deviations of the individual differences between the magni-

tude of a star as determined by the calibration curve for an individual

frame and its value as given in the SAO catalog. The RMS standard devia-

tion call

for the frames used is

call ° 0.2.

Thus, on the average, any star's magnitude can be calculated to within 0.2

using this method.

VI. VIGNETTING

Direct measurement of the vignetting function of the specific lens used

for these photographs was not possible. The lens was left on board theSkylab workshop, and sufficient time was not available for such measurement

between the inception of this experiment and launch. Fortunately, measure-

ments of the vignetting function for several similar lenses had been made

for investigations on Apollo flights, in particular the Low BrightnessAstronomical Photography (S211) investigation for which R. D. Mercer was

the Principal Investigator. These data and how they are obtained are de-

scribed elsewhere [10, 11]. From the data, Mercer c_arluded that there was

little difference in vignetting patterns between the same lens type. We

agreed with this conclusion and, thus, decided to base our vignetting cor-

rection on a single data set. We chose the 180-sec exposure frame taken

through the Apollo 17 lens [10, 11] and a blue filter in cnle.r to obtain

coverage over as much area of the 35-mm frame as possible. Figure 8, takenfrom Alvord [10], shows contours of the intensity recorded on that frame.

The contours indicate the vignetting pattern used for the data reduction

25

Page 36: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

0►

E

t

iN

tN

L4• NN^ O0! L> L7rL OJ

"D +-+

4u

L

u dc oo c

ar

bL NW r

C^m Ou r4 r

XW

4- Od

N }tJ tL 0)

^ uO C

IV 07t

N F-Lt0

N 01n

Ol 1^u %0ca a^L E

to-4- LW 4-O:

S-o

.4-

OJL7Im

I LL.

I 1 I 1 ^ 1 1 1 t I 1 1 I

N ^' O O O A IC 10 • A N ^" O3aniINJVw

26

Page 37: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

N O a • 1% •to10

Z%J"J.IMUVWW

27

Page 38: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

w ► uvK 4U^~(Y,

Figure 8. Contours of the intensity pattern

caused by vignetting thro l,gh a Nikon lens

similar to the one used in thisexperiment [10).

28

Page 39: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

_ "

here. It should be noted that the blue filter had no effect on the vi-

gnetting pattern of the lens.

To simplify the procedure for vignetting correction and to reduce the

computer core storage requirements, smoothed exposure data from the framereferenced previously were fit with a curve of the form

V - a+BR +YR2.

To model the vignetting pattern, R during the fitting process was the

distance from the pattern center to the point in question. To compensate

for a difference between the enter of the vignetting pattern and the frame

center, the X and Y offsets were two other parameters (five in all) which

the computer program varied to find the best fit to the data. In applica-tion, however, R was used as the distance from frame center to the point inquestion because there was no way of knowing if an offset existed for the

actual lens or how far or in which direction to offset the pattern.

For the data of Figure 8, the constants are:

a - 1.9198,

B - -0.6861,

Y - -1.0032.

Since there are slight differences in the vignetting pattern between

lenses, one might expect a systematic error between the reference star magni-tudes and those calculated from the fit curve. Using scatter diagrams of

(M mea ured - M SAO versus R, no consistent systematic effect was found.

ThereTore, errors resulting from not using the exact vignetting pattern are

small.

29

Page 40: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

REFERENCES

1. Snoddy, William C., and Barry, Richard J.: Comet Kohoutek Observa-tions from Skylab. The^Sk lab, Results, Vol. 31, Part 2, Advances in theAstronautical Sciences, Astronautical Society,, 1975, pp. 871-893.

2. Snoddy, William C., and Gary, G. Allen: Skylab Observations of CaretKohoutek. Scientific Investi gations on the Skylab Satellite. Progress iAstronautics and Aeronautics, Vol. 46 (Eds. M. Kent, E. 5tum inger, andS. Wu), American ns u e of Aeronautics and Astronautics, New York, 1976,pp. 237-249.

3. Craven, Paul D., Hembree, Ray V., and Lundquist, Charles A.: Photo-graphic Photometry from Skylab. Comet Kohoutek, NASA SP-355 (Ed. GilmerAllen Gary), Proceedings of a Workshop HeTT at MSFC, June 13-14, 1974,pp. 183-184 (1975).

4. MSFC Skylab Kohoutek Project Report. NASA TM X-64880, October 1974.

5. Barr, W. C., and Lybanon, M.: Program Documentation for Comet Kohou-tek Data Reduction. Memorandum Numbers 5E3010-1 through 5E3010-19, Com-puter Science Corporation, 1975 through May 1976.

6. Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Star Catalog, Smithsonian Institu-tion, Washington, D.C., 1966.

7. Deutschmann, W. A.: An Analysis of the Visual Magnitude of CometKohoutek. Center for Astrophysics Preprint No. 135; also Final Report onContract No. NAS8-30544, August 1974.

8. Kleine, T., and Kohoutek, L.: Photometric Parameters of Comet Kohou-tek 1973 XII. Comets Asteroids Meteorites: Interrelations Evolution andOrig ins. (Ed. a semme University oToledo, o e o, o,ecertEer 1977, pp. 69-76.

9. Jacchia, Luigi G.: The Brightness of Comets. Sky and Telescope,April 1974, p. 216.

10. Alvord, G. C.: Image Processing and Data Reduction of Apollo LowLight Level Photography. Contract No. NAS5-20683, State University of NewYork at A!bany, Computing Center, December 1974.

11. MercE,, . R. D.: Final Report, Apollo 5-211 Low Brightness, Astronom-ic,il Photography. Institute for Scientific and S pace Research, Inc.,Delmar, New York, recember 1974.

30

Page 41: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. … · 2013-08-31 · KOO= P! }T ET IC PHOTOGWE RINOff (S233) FIB. EMT 1. EXPERIWNT CONCEPT AND EXECUTION The Kohoutek Photometric

APPROVAL

KOHOUTEK PHOTOMETRIC PHOTOGRAPHY EXPERIMENT (S233)FINAL REPORT

By C. A. Lundquist and P. 01. Craven

The information in this report has beencontent. Review of any information concerninnuclear energy activities or programs has beeClassification Officer. This report, in itsto be unclassified.

reviewed for technical

g Department of Defense orn made by the MSFC Securityentirety, has been determined

US/Ii.A/1 -W- '000-

J. E. KINGSBURYActing Director, Space Sciences Laboratory

31*U.S GOVERNM[NT PRINTING C ► "ICE 1981- 51 071/09