this may not represent the view of the government 1 canada’s climate change plan large final...
TRANSCRIPT
This may not represent the view of the Government
1
Canada’s Climate Change Plan
Large Final Emitters Regimeand Domestic Offsets Regime
Stéphane Roberge, Legal CounselJustice Canada (Environment Canada Legal Services)
DOJ-CBA national section meeting October 24, 2003
This may not represent the view of the Government
2
Background on Plan
This may not represent the view of the Government
3
Climate Change Plan for Canada
• Released November 2002
• 3 step approach for achieving Canada’s Kyoto
target of 240 Mt CO2e reductions
o Actions underway 80 Mt
o New actions 100 Mt
o Remainder 60 Mt
This may not represent the view of the Government
4
Five Key Instruments in the Plan
• Large Final Emitters System
• Funding of partnerships with the Government of
Canada and Provinces/Territories
• Strategic infrastructure investments
• Coordinated Innovation Strategy
• Targeted measures
This may not represent the view of the Government
5
Large Final Emitters (LFE) Regime
This may not represent the view of the Government
6
Basics• Overall environmental objective
• 55 Mt of emission reductions• Emission intensity targets (i.e., not absolute
targets) with access to emissions trading• allocation of permits based on output and
emission intensity factors• Coverage: oil and gas, electricity generation,
mining and manufacturing• About half of Canada’s 2010 GHG emissions
• Implemented through • default legal regime, and/or• when appropriate, negotiated covenants
This may not represent the view of the Government
7
Rationale for Trading Regimes(example of a 1000 tonnes reduction)
Company 1 can reduce 1000 tonnes at $8/tonne = $8000
Company 2 can reduce 500 tonnes at $12/tonne = $6,000
Seller as lower costs
Buyer ashigher costs
500 tonnes at $8/tonne
Overall costs:
$8,000 with trading and
$10,000 without7
This may not represent the view of the Government
8
Allocation of permits
o Tradeable permits to be allocated to covered firms at no cost
o Allocation based on an specified emissions-intensity factor and possibly percentage of estimated emissions (e.g., 85% of BAU emissions)
o Quantity of permits to a given firm to be calculated by multiplying its emissions-intensity factor by its quantity of specific output
This may not represent the view of the Government
9
Compliance
• Covered firms to demonstrate compliance by submitting a quantity of specified permits equal to monitored emissions
• Specified permits to include– permits issued under the LFE system – domestic offsets credits issued on the basis of
a project and– tradeable permits issued under the Kyoto
regime
This may not represent the view of the Government
10
Domestic Offsets Regime
This may not represent the view of the Government
11
Basics
• Offsets projects are domestic reductions or removals in emissions not covered under the LFE Regime o Reduction: decrease in emissions released into the
atmosphere by a source
o Removal: trapping of atmospheric emissions in a sink
• Offsets permits awarded for reductions/removals resulting from offsets projects
• Offsets permits acceptable to demonstrate compliance under the LFE Regime
This may not represent the view of the Government
12
CROSS-CUTTING DESIGN ELEMENTS
• PRINCIPLES
• ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
• ADMINISTRATION ISSUES
• GOVERNANCE and REVIEW PROCESS
• REGISTRIES
• TRADING & LINKS WITH INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS
• DESIGN ISSUES
• BASELINES
• BOUNDARIES & LEAKAGE
• NON-PERMANENCE OF REMOVAL PROJECTS
This may not represent the view of the Government
13
Principles
• Principleso Enhance market liquidityo Open as practical
• Agriculture and Forestry
• Landfill Gas ?
• Others ???
o Contribute to Kyoto commitmento Create an incentive for investment in Canadao Provide the right incentives for action
This may not represent the view of the Government
14
Eligibility Criteria
o Criteria to determine eligible offsets projects in order to ensure integrity of offsets permits:
o Inclusion in National inventory
o Project start date
o Crediting period
o Real, Measurable, Verifiable
o Surplus
o Unique
o Ownership
This may not represent the view of the Government
15
Governance and Review Process
• Governanceo options: federal body, federal/provincial body, or private
sector/provincial body with federal government oversight
• Review Processo Ex ante validation of projects
o Ex post verification of GHG reductions/removals o Guidance and quantification protocols
o Issuance of offset credits (possible early issuance)
This may not represent the view of the Government
16
REGISTRIES
compliance unit registry • track ownership of compliance units
• separate domestic registry for tracking domestic units or an expanded National Registry to track domestic units as well as Kyoto units
offset project registry• store standard quantification-verification protocols
• track offset projects from application to issuance of credits
• store all documentation related to offset projects
• provide non-confidential information for public review
This may not represent the view of the Government
17
TRADING & LINKS WITH INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM
trading• trading via bilateral contracts or exchanges• large role for private sector; rules set by government
links with international system• offset system design informed by Kyoto Flexibility
Mechanisms but driven by domestic policy objectives • for projects hosted in Canada, similar rules under Offsets
regime and Kyoto Flexibility Mechanism• Offsets permits not accepted outside Canada or for Kyoto
compliance but could be exchanged for Kyoto units
This may not represent the view of the Government
18
BASELINES
project baseline
• represents reductions/removals that would occur in the absence of the project (includes BAU reductions/removals)
• used to determine quantity of reductions/removals to be credited
o reductions: difference between project baseline and actual emissions with project in place
o removals: difference between the baseline carbon stock change and the actual carbon stock change
This may not represent the view of the Government
19
BOUNDARIES & LEAKAGE
project boundary• defined to include all GHG sources/sinks under the control
of the proponent that are significant and reasonably attributable to the project activity
• identifies the reductions/removals to be included in the determination of offset credits
leakage• increase in emissions/decrease in removals outside a
project’s boundary that are significant, reasonably attributable to the project activity but are not under the control of the proponent
This may not represent the view of the Government
20
NON-PERMANENCE OF REMOVAL PROJECTS
non-permanence or reversal events
• partial or total loss of a carbon stock due to a natural
disturbance (e.g., pest outbreak) or a change in land
management practice (e.g., harvesting, soil cultivation)
key issues
• liability for a carbon reversal after the issuance of offset
credits - buyer? seller? government (economy as whole)?
• time carbon must remain sequestered to be considered
equivalent to an emission reduction