this project is funded by national science centre of poland on the basis of the decision nr...
DESCRIPTION
METHODOLOGY (1) MODEL OF ABSOLUTE CONVERGENCE average annual change of GDP per capita (static approach)TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126 US counties and European NUTS 3 regions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062523/5a4d1ae07f8b9ab059976cc2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126
US counties and European NUTS 3 regions in 21 st century – wealth of citizens, convergence
processes and spatial dependencies
Paweł FolfasWarsaw School of Economics
![Page 2: This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126 US counties and European NUTS 3 regions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062523/5a4d1ae07f8b9ab059976cc2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
AIM OF RESEARCH
• answer question whether absolute income (GDP per capita) beta-convergence exists in the case of regions of the United States (US counties) and of the EU-28 (NUTS 3) during period 2000-2011
• Samples consist of 3130 US regions (counties) and 1352 regions of the EU (NUTS 3)
• Forthcoming Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership may become a crucial element in the post-crisis world economics and politics. Consequently, it is worth to scrutinize economic performance of the United States and the European Union.
![Page 3: This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126 US counties and European NUTS 3 regions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062523/5a4d1ae07f8b9ab059976cc2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
METHODOLOGY (1)MODEL OF ABSOLUTE CONVERGENCE
• where y i,0 and y i,1 correspond to the GDP per capita of region i at the initial and final year respectively and n is the number of years in analysed period
average annual change of GDP per capita (static approach)
![Page 4: This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126 US counties and European NUTS 3 regions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062523/5a4d1ae07f8b9ab059976cc2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
METHODOLOGY (2)SPATIAL ECONOMETRICS
• Ordinary or not-linear last squares (OLS or NLS) methods do not include the possible spatial dependencies between regions
• Spatial estimation techniques:– Spatial lagged model (SLM) and spatial error model (SEM)– Spatial Durbin model
![Page 5: This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126 US counties and European NUTS 3 regions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062523/5a4d1ae07f8b9ab059976cc2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
METHODOLOGY (3)SPATIAL LAGGED MODEL
• where yi and yj correspond to dependent variable in region i and in neighbouring regions j respectively and X is the set of independent variable
• matrix W reflects spatial relations between analyzed regions (it shows how pairs of regions relate to each other – a binary matrix with values equaling 1 when the regions are neighbours and 0 otherwise)
regions from different EU Member States are neighbours – international spatial dependencies
• rho-parameter (ρ) is the spatial coefficient, which is used to assess the existence and strength of spatial relations
![Page 6: This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126 US counties and European NUTS 3 regions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062523/5a4d1ae07f8b9ab059976cc2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
METHODOLOGY (4)SPATIAL ERROR MODEL
• where Wui is the spatial lagged error term, εi is the random error term of the model, and λ is a coefficient that is introduced to the model to satisfy the assumption about random error terms
• matrix W reflects spatial relations between analyzed regions (it shows how pairs of regions relate to each other – a binary matrix with values equaling 1 when the regions are neighbours and 0 otherwise)
regions from different EU Member States are neighbours – international spatial dependencies
• lambda-parameter (λ) shows to what extent shocks in neighbouring regions are transferred to the analysed region
![Page 7: This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126 US counties and European NUTS 3 regions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062523/5a4d1ae07f8b9ab059976cc2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
DATA
• Data concerning GDP per capita of NUTS 3 regions are extracted from Eurostat statistical database
• Data for US counties from BEA
• Average number of neighbouring regions:– 5,85 for US counties– 5,13 for EU NUTS 3 regions
![Page 8: This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126 US counties and European NUTS 3 regions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062523/5a4d1ae07f8b9ab059976cc2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ESTIMATIONS RESULTS INTRODUCTION
• In the case of US regions error model is slightly better than lagged model
• In the case of EU regions spatial model is slightly better than error model
• The most adequate, both for US and UE regions, is Durbin spatial model including lagged and error model
![Page 9: This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126 US counties and European NUTS 3 regions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062523/5a4d1ae07f8b9ab059976cc2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ESTIMATION RESULTS (1)SPATIAL LAGGED MODELS
US EU
Intercept 0.19232499*** 0.1484877***
ln y0 -0.01659583*** -0.0140344***
ρ 0.27912*** 0.50173***
*** denotes statistical significance at level 0.001 Source: Own study based on estimation in R CRAN
beta-convergence at the level of 1.54%
(annual speed)
much stronger spatial
dependencies among EU than US
regions
![Page 10: This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126 US counties and European NUTS 3 regions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062523/5a4d1ae07f8b9ab059976cc2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ESTIMATION RESULTS (2)SPATIAL ERROR MODELS
US EU
Intercept 0. 20579953*** 0. 20227444***
ln y0 -0. 01696100*** -0. 01818721***
ρ 0. 29173*** 0. 63809***
*** denotes statistical significance at level 0.001 Source: Own study based on estimation in R CRAN
beta-convergence at the level of 1.90%
(annual speed)
![Page 11: This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126 US counties and European NUTS 3 regions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062523/5a4d1ae07f8b9ab059976cc2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ESTIMATION RESULTS (3)DURBIN MODELS
US EU
Intercept 0.14921261 *** 0. 11717139***
ln y0 -0.01695825 *** -0. 01599379***
lag ln y00.00460232*** 0.00498002***
ρ 0.29175 *** 0. 58479 ***
*** denotes statistical significance at level 0.001 Source: Own study based on estimation in R CRAN
beta-convergence at the level of 1.90%
(annual speed)
beta-convergence at the level of 1.78%
(annual speed)
much stronger spatial
dependencies among EU than US
regions
![Page 12: This project is funded by National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of the decision Nr DEC-2013/11/B/HS4/02126 US counties and European NUTS 3 regions](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062523/5a4d1ae07f8b9ab059976cc2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS
• During period 2000-2011 average annual speed of convergence among regions in US was faster than between regions of EU-28.
• US GDP pc/ EU-28 GDP pc
• EU-28 regions are characterized by stronger spatial dependencies that regions of the United States.
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2.06 2.09 1.97 1.69 1.55 1.57 1.55 1.39 1.31 1.43 1.48 1.41