tisa link to the end user in the traffic information value ...€¦ · click to edit master title...

13-11-2018 1

TISA – link to the end user in the traffic information value chain Stéphanie Chaufton, TISA Coordinator

Click to edit Master title style

Utrecht, 14 and 15 November

TISA Global memberhip

2

Devices

Information Provider

Public authorities & private road operators

Service Provider

Communication

along

the

entire

value

chain



• TISA aims to moderate the discussion and consensus-finding along the value chain, involving all stakeholders

Value Chain

3

Influence of

commercial

actors

Example: Harmonization of the interface Content Service (handover point DATEX TMC/TPEG)

Alignment and unambiguous interpretation of information (messages) is very important to maintain consistency and quality along the value chain

ServiceContent

Content detection

Contentprocessing

Service provision

Service presentation

Event,

traffic situationEnd user



• Action C defines a list of categories of safety related traffic information a. Temporary slippery road b. Animal/people/obstacles/debris on the road c. Unprotected accident area d. Short term road works f. Wrong-way driver g. Unmanaged blockage of a road h. Exceptional weather conditions

Joint Effort

• Agreement of corresponding messages for each category

1st publication in 2014 2nd publication in 2017

Joint Task Force led by Bard de Vries, DATEXII, RWS

• Reflect countries best practices

• Future revisions planned

Delegated Act Priority Action C

4

DATEX II (CEN/TS 16157) TMC Events (EN ISO 14819-2) TPEG-TEC

(ISO/TS 21219-15) DENM

(ETSI EN 302 637-3)

DA

TE

X C

lass

TY

PE

Su

pp

lem

en

tary

Po

sit

ion

De

scri

pti

on

Lin

e

Te

xt

(CE

N-

En

gli

sh

)

Co

de

Ca

us

e C

od

e

Su

b C

au

se

Co

de

Wa

rnin

g L

ev

el

Te

xt

Su

bC

au

se

Cod

e

tru

mp

s C

au

se

Co

de

Ca

us

e C

od

e

Su

b C

au

se

Co

de

Te

xt

Su

bC

au

se

Cod

e

tru

mp

s

Ca

use

Co

de

EnvironmentalObstruction flooding 880 flooding. Danger 908 5 1 3 flooding

9 0 hazardous location - surface condition

WeatherRelatedRoadConditions surfaceWater 980 danger of aquaplaning 1002 7 3 aquaplaning 6 0 adverse weather

condition -adhesion

WeatherRelatedRoadConditions surfaceWater 977 surface water hazard 1041 7 3 aquaplaning 6 0 adverse weather

condition -adhesion

WeatherRelatedRoadConditions slipperyRoad 979 slippery road (above Q hundred metres)

1003 6 3 slippery road 6 0 adverse weather

condition -adhesion

NonWeatherRelatedRoad Conditions

mudOnRoad 981 mud on road. Danger 1055 6 3 3 mud on road

6 3 mud on road


looseChippings 985 loose chippings. Danger 1056 6 8 3 loose chippings

6 8 loose chippings


oilOnRoad 987 oil on road. Danger 1057 6 7 3 oil on road

6 7 oil on road


petrolOnRoad 989 petrol on road. Danger 1058 6 2 3 fuel on road

6 2 fuel on road

WeatherRelatedRoadConditions ice 992 ice (above Q hundred metres)

1006 6 5 3 ice on road

6 5 ice on road

WeatherRelatedRoadConditions blackIce 996 black ice (above Q hundred metres)

1008 6 6 3 black ice on road

6 6 black ice on road

WeatherRelatedRoadConditions snowDrifts 1006 snow drifts (above Q hundred metres)

1016 9 5 3 snow drifts

9 5 snow drifts

WeatherRelatedRoadConditions icyPatches 996 icy patches (above Q hundred metres)

1047 6 5 3 ice on road

6 5 ice on road



NAPs for safety-related traffic data

• Members states shall manage National Access Points for SRTI data

• National bodies have to assess compliance

• Data and service providers have to submit a Declaration of compliance in all countries where they are active (Article 9: road safety-related categories covered, format of the data, the means of dissemination of the information service to end users)

Joint effort:

• Self-assessment is the most likely manner

• Risk of high administrative burden for both National Bodies and data/service providers

• During a series of TISA - EU EIP workshops: stakeholders recognized & agreed on the need for an harmonised approach with a Uniform Declaration of Compliance Form


5



Uniform declaration: Key principles

• No official ‘decision’, it will be a model declaration. Organisations are free to use it (or not)

• Contribute to common understanding of Delegated Regulation

• Should lead to win-win for Member States, road authorities/operators and digital map producers/service providers

• Complies to minimum requirements as mentioned in the Delegated Regulation

Outcome

• Uniform Declaration of Compliance for priority action ‘C’ (2016)

• Introduction Letter

• Explanatory terms to facilitate common understanding


6



Assessment of compliance • Member States may request from road authorities/operators, map producers

and service providers documents describing the type & quality of data • Submission of a Declaration of Compliance for all countries

Joint effort • Building on the experiences gained from DoC for Priority Action C • Distinction between road operators/authorities and digital map

producers/service providers

Outcome • 2 forms: 1 for road authorities/operators, 1 for map makers & service providers • Introduction Letter • Explanatory terms to facilitate common understanding

Delegated Act - Priority Action B

7



• Quality of traffic information Position Paper

• Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) collaborations • with contributions based on experiences of the LTA Singapore collaboration with Quantum

Invention on TMC Event List related to road toll gantries. Best practices with Danish Road Directorate

Liaison with

• Quality WG lead by P. Lubrich, BASt

• Experience exchange for quality management

• Updating of the position paper

• Future activities • Quality management in the ecosystems for automated & connected driving?

Quality of Traffic Information

8



Country Specific Driving Restrictions • Navigation systems need to take restricted roads/areas into consideration during

the route planning • Use case proposed by China, applicable

to Europe as well

Individualised Traffic Control

• Individualised advices of mixed manual-automated traffic

Complex road geometries

• Support for AD vehicles to navigate e.g. through toll gates

Use Case under development

9



Traveller Information Services Association (TISA) ASBL

Avenue Louise 326

1050 Brussels

Belgium

hosted by

Matthias Unbehaun, TISA Executive Director, <[email protected]>

Stéphanie Chaufton, TISA Coordinator, <[email protected]>

Patricia Pelfrene, TISA Activity Manager, <[email protected]>

www.tisa.org

TISA contact

10

http://www.tisa.org/

tisa link to the end user in the traffic information value ...€¦ · click to edit master title...

Documents