title development on sea turtle ecotourism in mannai ... · 7† development on sea turtle...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Title DEVELOPMENT ON SEA TURTLE ECOTOURISM INMANNAI ISLAND
Author(s)Okuyama, Junichi; Boonhai, Kanokwan; Boonmee, Panumard;Monanunsap, Somchai; Charuchinda, Mickmin; ARAI,Nobuaki
Citation Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on SEASTAR2000 (2002):71-78
Issue Date 2002
URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/44162
Right
Type Conference Paper
Textversion publisher
Kyoto University
-
7†
DEVELOPMENT ON SEA TURTLE ECOTOURrSM
IN NIANNAIISLAND
2 JunichiOkuyamal,KanokwanBoonhai2,PanumardBoonmee, SomchaiMananunsap2,MickminCharuchida2,NobuakiArail
ブ G伯du∂feScわ00/orSoc由仙わ仰∂f/碍町OfoU〃ルe/S/如ノ旬0わ606-∂507,J∂p即
亡-m∂〟ニ0〟り唱m∂@b帽.SOC・/・如わーU・∂CJp,∂帽/@/・J少0わーU・∂CJpJ 2
seaTurtleConsewationStat(On,EastemMarjneandCoastalResourcesResearchCenter;
M油s叶Of〟∂fu帽/尺esoLJ化eSand亡∩血nmeJ鳩尺∂γOJ唱2了了90,m∂〟∂nd・
亡-m∂〟ニm∂nn∂/@Joズ/nわ.co.肋
ABSTRACT
NowadaystherearemanytouristsvisitingRayongforthemarinesports・SomeofthemmakeatriptoMannai LsIandtoseeseaturtles.SeaTurtleConservationStationinMannailslandwasestablishedfoTthebiologlCalstudy andtheconservationofseatuTlles,andcan bethefaciIityforenvironmentaleducationandsuitablebase、■of ecDtOurisminthefuture.OuraimofthesurveyistoexaminethepossibilityoftheecotourismdevelopmentinMa:血ai lsrand.1bunderstandthecurrentsituationofthetourisminthearea.weinterviewed39touristsand47localpe〔〉Pre intheMannailslandarea.AEotoflocarpeoplehavetheop-nionthattheenvironmentarconservationisimportant・eVen thoughcomparingwiththeeconomicdeve■opment・The■oca■peop■e■arge■yfeeltheenvironmenta.and,昌conomic conditionsaregood.Thisfactwonrtfueltheirmotivationsomuchtoparticipateinecotourism・However,theresult thatmostlocalpeoplewantedtobeinvoIvedinthemainjoborthesidejobrelatedtoecotourismhastheimportant signifECanCe.1bmakeaprogramwhichcangLVeanOtherjobtothenlCanbethekeytothesuccessofecotourism・
lNTRODUCT10N
Al[seaturtlesaTeVulnerabletoavaTietyofhuman
threats,incIuding:COmmerCialtrawllng;boat strike;
pollution;reefbombingこ■ngeStionofEitter;VehiculartrafRc
on beaches;and tourism deve10Pment(Arianoutsou,
1988;Johnsonetal..1996:WilsonandTisdeIl,2001)・For
theconservationDfthem.sustainabIeuseofbio-reSOurCeS
andunderstandingofthepeopleabouttheirvuInerability
isnecessary.lnaddition,WeWillhavetoseektheefFective
conservation measuresthatpromotethem・ln recent
years,eCOtOurismispaidattentiontoasthemeansthat
materializes effective conservation,
MannailslandbeLongstoRayongP「0Vinceandis
locatedabout200kmattheeastofBangkok.Thelorlg
beachatRayongisthefamoustouristspot・Thereare
manytouristsforthemarinesports・Accordingtotourism
statisticsofRayong(lburismAuthorityofThai[and,2002)
the numberoftouristsvisiting to Rayong provincein
2002is2,388,546.TheMannails[andareaisdividedup
into the three sections.The firstis the resort section
which hasa Long beach.lnthissection,manyhotels】
restaurantsandtouragencyarebuiltdenselya10ngthe
coast.The second sectionis thefishery section.The
Mannailsland area hasthe scattered fisheryvi‖ages
wherethefishermen nve byflShing squids,Crabsand
someflShes.Thethirdisthe urban section whichis a
litt[efarfromthecoast.AndintheRayongwatersthere
arevarioussizeofthelslands】andtheoneofwhichis
Mannailsland.Sametlslandwhichisthebiggestls[andin
-
72
theRayongwatersisdesignatedastheOceanNational
Park andis also the famoustourist spots for diving,
SWimm[ng.
lnMannai.sland,SeaTurtleConservationSlation
(STCS)was establishedforthe biologicaE studyand
conservation ofseaturtles.Some ofthetourists made a
Sidetripto Mannailsland to see the seaturtles.The
number oftourists visiting to Mannailsrandin2002
is more than6,000.The STCS has the educational
exhibition of the sea tu州es and other marine endan-
gered species.Therefore,theSTCScan bethefacility
for environmentaF education and suitable base of
ecotourismin the future.
lnterpretation and education has been
advocated asthe mosteffective rnanagementstrategy
in tourisトWildlifeinteractions becauseitincreases
awareness about a s.pecies and encourages a
conservation ethic.The effective utilization of the
SPeCiaIized educationalfunctions ofthe STCS can
COntribute to future conservation ofthe sea turtles,
Undersuchcondition,WearePFannlngtOdeverop
rrEcotourism11in the Mannailsland area.Sustainable
ecotourism must nleet the demands of the five actors
relatedwithitseIf;theIocalpeople.tourists,reSearChers,
travelagencyand administrators(Maita,2001).Many
】nterreFated processesinfluencethe potentialand suc-
CeSS Ofecotourism within a protected area andlinks
betweennaturalareas,theEocalpeopleandtourism(Ross
&Wall,(1999)).Furthermore,ifplanning and decision-
makingdonotinvoIveFocalpDPulations,thenecotourism
Wilr notsucceed,and mayeven bedetrimentaltolocal
COmmunities(Ziffer,1989).AndIocalpeTCePtionswilrbe
animportantfactorinfluencrnghowitsdevelopmentpro-
Ceeds(CampbeII,1999).
Recentlyalotofresearchesreratedtoecotourism
are conductedin various place,for example,Proieto
IAMARinBraziI(Marcovaldi&Marcovaldi,1999)】Awala
andYalimpooin French Guiana(M.H.Godfrey,2001),
lbrtuguero NationalPark,Gandoca and Manzanillo
Wildlife Refuge and Leatherbacks of Guanacaste
NationalParkinCostaRica(L.M.CampbelI,2002),and
theMonReposConservationparkinAustraIia(Wirson&
Tisderl,2001),and ofwhich some research havethe
SOCio-eCOnOmicaspects ofthe seaturtle conservation.
Achievement of wildlife conservation should be
COnSidered notonlytheaspectofnaturalsciencebut
SOCioLeCOnOmic science.And also guiderines and
Criteriaconcernedecotourismmustencompassnoton[y
the biologicarimpacts butalsothesocialand political
issues surrounding development.as Scheyvens
mentioned(1999)・ln making the guideline and the
managementprogramofecotourism,theideaofworking
On CaSe-by-CaSe basisforecotourismis animpor(ant
One,and shouId not beignored the communityln
question.Theneedsandpossibilitiesofthe10Calareas
Shourdbethefocusofdesignandp[anmng,ratherthan
the specifics ofprogrammes elsewhere.Thefocus
Shourdnotbesomuchonemulatingotherprogrammes
ersewhere,but finding solution to problems and
situations specific to the community in question
(Matthew.2001).
TheMannailslandareadiffersinonemaJOrWay
with other research sites above.Itisthattheseaturtles
SeldomlaytheeggsintheMannailslandarea.Thishas
considerableinfluence over the ecotourism model.
GeneraMy.ecotourismhasthreeoりIeCtives;enVironmental
COnSerVation(incIudingenvironmentaleducation),Eocal
economic development and deveIopment of another
tourism.Thesea turtle ecotourism sites above heavlly
tingeswithenvironmentalconservation.rnthecaseof
the MannailsFand area.ecotourism willemphasis on
environmentaleducation,localeconomic deveEopment
and deveFopmentofanothertourism.ratherthan sea
turtleconservation direct[y,ltiswithinthis contextthat
We have to make another management program on
the basis of the socio-eCOnOmic attributes of the
localcomrT[unity.
Ouraim ofthe surveylStOCOnSiderthecurrent
Situationofthetourism,thelocalcommunityatRayong.
ThaiIand,and attempt to evaluate the potentialfor
developing ecotourismin the Mannai[sland area,
Thereforeweare plann[ngtOinvestigateintothede-
mandsoftheactors,eSPeCially10CaIpeopleandtourists
bythequestionnairemethods.
SURVEYMETHODS
ln the beginnlng,We COnducted the preliminary
StudyintheMannailslandareafrom15to17November
2002.Weinterviewed47localpeople and39tourists,
Ofwhich47and37were valid respectively.Some
questions were notfilred out,therefore we excFuded
these questionsfrom consideration.
QUEST10NNAIRESURVEY&INTERVIEW
FORTHELOCALPEOPLE
The questionnaire survey andinterviewforthe
localpeoplewere conductedin the resortsection,the
fishery section and the urban section where the
-
73
軸7 meM∂∩〃∂′JsJ即d∂佗a.R∂yOng,ma/Ja〃d・m摺ee//画C∂Jm∂血’’of地cれc厄mo∂J9帽γa〃d/匂加9侶y /nd/C∂fe的佗eSeC〟onsor納eresoJ†,′sec〟0∩,納e鮎わe/γSeCf/m∂nd的℃UrbanざeC〟0∩佗印eC仙e小
decision-makingconcernedwithecotourism・Enthis
paperweaskedthe10Calpeopleandthetouristsabout
their environmentalawareness.
Asaresultofthequestion;11Areyoし=nterestedin
theenvironmentalissues?”,81%localpeople(3Bof47
respondents)and95%tourists(350f37respondents)
answeredl’lnterestedverymuchrl,Or”lnterestedalittler■・
lneachcategory,therespondentsfe[ttohavethestrong
environmentalawarenesssubjectively.Fewlocalpeople
had no concem tothe environmentalissues.
Lnanotherquestion;■■Whichismo「eimpo止ant,r■
Economicdevelopment”,一,Environmentalconservationl’?”
(Fig.2),50%tourists(180f36respondents)and13%
localpeopLe(60f46respondents)hadtheopinionsthat
economicdevelopmentismoreimportantthanenviron-
mentalconservation.On the other hand.39%tourists
(14of36respondents)and59%]ocalpeople(270f46
respondents)hadtheoppositeopinions・
Somerespondentsanswered”Both川becausewe
made a mistake how to ask.However,eVenif the
numberofTeSPOndenthadanswered■1Both’laddedto
thefeweranswerin each question,the resultswere
COmPa「ab】e.
1bbesummarized.mostrespondentsanswered
I■rminterestedinenvironmentalproblem’■.Ontheother
hand,in the case ofthe question which compares
environmentalconseNationwitheconomicdevelopment,
thetouristIsperception wasdifferentfromthelocal
numbersofrespondentswere20,10and17respectively
(Fig.1).ThecontentsofthequestionnairefortheLocal
peoplewerethe basicattributionand theawareness
concern■ngthelocalsocietyltheenvironmentallandthe
sea turtles.
QUEST10NNA]RESURVEY
FORTOURISTS
Thequestionnairesurveywasconductedforthe
touristsvisitingtoMannailsland・Thecontentsofthe
questionnairefoTtOuristswerethebasicattribution・and
the awareness concerning the environmental,and
the sea turtles.The questions about environmental
awarenessweresameasforthelocaLpeople.Thevalid
responseswere28Thaitouristsand9fore■gntOurists・
TheforelgntOuristsincluded2personswholiveBangkok
atthetimeofthesurvey.
RESULJSANDDISCUSSLON
ENVIRONMENTÅLCONC10USNESS
lbpron10teOfdeveLop■n90neCOtOurismlthe
perceptions and theawarenesswhich the actors
related withitseLfhaveareimportantfactor,and the
environmentalawareness hasaessentialroleintheir
-
74
∩) 0 0 ∩) (U O ∧U n) U O O
(_)¢叫書u¢UL¢d
口Tourists
■Local
E[.0nOmc Envlmnmerlt;】l
deveopment conse「∨細ion
R9・2 丁わere5U鹿of析eques~/0/1ノ“仇伽cわ由mo佗人mPOJ十∂nr,‘仁coJlOm/cdeye/oJ)me〃f’’or‘苫∩山のnm即ねJ
COJつ5eJVar/0/1’’?’二乃u/砲座∵∩=36JLoc∂Jpeop/e/∩=46
PeOPFe■sone.Thereason ofthisdifferencecan bethat
the respondentsjudgedtheirenvironmentalawareness
Sub]eCtively.ln consequence】thequestionswhich need
more objectivejudgrnent bycompa「lng With economic
developmentled a differentresult.The resu▼tofthese
questiDnSindicatesthatmostpeoplewhofeltto have
St「Ong enVironmentalawareness regarded economic
developmentasimpoTtantin「eality.
SeaturtIes.lnthetourists,”Cutelr,”Obligationofconser-
Vation’1and’’BeautifuI”werethe prevaillng OPFnions as
WelIasthelocalpeople.Andtherewasnopessimisticor
negativeoplnioninboththelocaIpeopleandthetourists.
ln consequence,itis suggested mostlocalpeople and
tourists had a favo「impression.
1bthequestion;■■Doyouknowtheseaturtlesare
endangerspeciesgIobally?’r,72%localpeople(280f47
respondents)and89%tourists(290f37respondents)
answe「ed’■Yesr■,the otherrespondents answered”No”.
Furthermore.we asked the reason whytheyare
decreaslng Ofthe respondents who answered”Yes”
(lbble,2).lnthelocaEpeople,a”reasonsansweredwere
COnCemedwiththeresponsibilityofhumanityand many
Ofthem were abstract.In the concrete reasons,there
Were eightanswers concerned with■■Drownlng because
Offishinggearslikeaglllnet,traWIIngnet”.6oftheeight
respondentswerefishermen,andthenitseemsthatthe
PeOPIewererareexceptfishermenwhounderstoodthe
incidentalcatch byfishing gears.60f7fishermen
answered”D「ownmg because of fishing gears”.Jt
indicates thatmanyflShermen acknowledged the main
reasonofseaturtle■sdecreaseistheincidentalcatchby
fishinggears.Ontheotherhand,therewere6answers
COnCerned with’rHuman eatthe seaturtres”,tWO and
anothertwo ofwhich are concemed especiallyon11The
egg harvesting”and”Fishermen eatthe sea turtIes”,
respectively.Andtherewasonediscrrminatorydescription
aboutfishermenthat■lSomeflShermen don’thaveany
knowledge becauseofnoeducation.sotheyeatsea
turtlesandtheireggswithoutworrylngaboutanything’’
byaloc8,.
ln the tourists,there were many自bstTaCt
answers concerned with the responsibility ofhumhFlity
as we-1as the[ocalpeople.■■The sharks eatthe sea
lMPRESS10NON&KNOWLEDGEOF
THEDECREASINGOFSEATURTLE
Theimpressiononandtheperceptionofthesea
turtlesarevery(mPOrtanttOnlakeamanagementplanof
ecotourismandtopromotetheseatu州eecotourism.In
thispaperweaskedthelocalpeopleandthetourists
abouttheimpressionontheseaturtles,therelationship
betweenthemandtheseaturtles】andtheperceptionof
decreaslng Ofthe sea turtles.ln addition,Onryforthe
residentswholivedintheflSherysection,Weinterviewed
themdeeplyabouttheirrelationshiptoabovefactors.
lnthequestion;”DoyouIiketheseaturtIes?’■,84%
locaIpeople(380f45respondents)and89%tourists
(330f37respondents)answered”Yes■1.Some respon-
dentsanswered■1Unknownr’,and onlytwolocar people
answered”No■1.1bbFe.1showsthe resultoftheques-
tion;r■Whatdoyouthinkaboutseaturtle?”.lnthelocal
PeOPEe,■lBeautiful■1wasthe mostoplnionanswe「ed by
13respondents】”Cute’■wasthethirdn10StOPlnion.Asa
resuIt,manylocalpeopreshowedthefavorabreimpression
On theseaturtFe■s appearance.Thesecond andfourth
mostopInionswere■10bligation ofconservation’rand
”Endangeredspecies■1respectively.andtheothersome
OPLnionswereconcerned with the decreasIng Ofthe
-
乃
lbblel.Summaryofal]oplnionsofthe10Calpeopleandthetourists,andthe nuTTlberof
themselvesin concemingtothequestion;“Whatdoyouthinkabouttheseaturtles?”
LocalPeople Number Tourists Number
Beautiful 13 Cute 8
Obligation of conservation 6 Obligationofconservation 4
Cute 3 Beautifu1 3
Endangerspecies 2 Big,Varioussize 3
lnteresting 】nteresting ∠ Big,\ねrioussize Neverseenbefore 2
Unusual,Rare Unusual,Rare 2
Emotional Endangerspecies l
Emotiona1 1
Total 28 Tbta1 26
Table2.Summary of a”op]nions ofthe rocaL people andthetourists and the number oftllemSelvesin
COnCermngtOthequestion;“Doyou knowthe reasonwhytheseaturtlesareendangered?”
LocalPeople Number Tourists Number
Drowingbecauseoffishinggears 8 Humanity 9
Consumedbyhuman 6 Destruction,Po‖utionofEnvironmen 8
Destruction,PoLlutionofEnvironmen 5 Consumedbyhuman 5
Humanity 4 Hunting for shell 3
Sa【弓ng 3 Sal竜ng
Other 2 DrowingbecauseofflShhlggearS
Predation by Shark
Other
Tbtal 28 Tbtat 29
36respondents)regardedtheirdecreasing asserious・
1nthis resultthepercentageofthetouristswashigher
thanthe10Calpeopleaswellastheknowledgethatsea
turtlesare endangered.
turtles”wasonlyanswerrelatedtoa naturalmortality・
ln concrete answers,‖The seaturtles drown because
Of fishing gears”was the only one.The reason of
SUChvaguenesscan bethatthetouristsdonthave a
relationshiptotheseaturtlesaswellastheLocalpeople
exceptfishermen,There were5answers concemed
with ”Human eatthe seaturtles”.and two ofwhich
wereconcerned especia[Eyon”The egg harvesting”・
A”ofthese5respondentswereThaiand noforeign
tourists.These resultsimplythefore[gntOuristsdon’t
havesQStrOngrelationshiptoseaturtlesandthetradi-
tionaIhabitofeatingthem.0ntheotherhand,Thaiused
toeatseaturtlesandtheireggs,andthe10Calpeople
SeemtOgueSSSOmeO=hemstilleatseaturtlesiIlegally・
Onthedecreaslng OftheseaturtIes,76%local
PeOPle(360f47respondenls)and97%tourists(350f
ATTITUDETOECOTOURISM
lt)introduce ecotourism has various effects on
thelocalsociety,Therearenoton[ygoodbutalsobad
effects.Whenwewi”promotetDdevelopecotourism,
theactorsreIatedwithitself,eSPeCialIythelocalpeople
must understoodthevariouseffect and have a effortto
encourage goodeffectsandtocontrolbadeffects・ln
thispaperweaskedthelocalpeopreabouttheawareness
of the present environmental and economic condition
-
76
aroundtheMannailslandarea.WeaskedtherTltOdetermine
WhethertoapprovetheintrDducingofecotourismafter
WeeXPlainedbrieflytothemaboutthelikelyimpactof
ecotourism.
Fig.3shows the TeSUlts of the question
COnCernedwiththepresentenvironmenta[andeconomic
COndition.As to naturalenvironment,38%(170f46
respondents)and34%(160f46respondents)answered
”Good”and11NeutraF■’respectively.The percentages of
respondents who answered”Bad”or’’Very badr’
amounted to15%,anditcan beconcluded manylocal
PeOPleevaluatedthenaturalenvironmentwasnotbad,
Concerningtothepresenteconomiccondition,52%(24
0f46respondents)and33%(150f46「espondents)
answered”Good”.”Neutral”respectively.Thepercentages
of respondents who answeredllBadl’or”Very badll
amountedto13%.anditcanbeconc[uded manylocal
PeOPleevaluatetheeconomicconditionwasnotbadas
wellas the naturalenvironment.
rn the next,afterwe explained brieflythe FikeEy
impactofecotourismtotheIocalpeople,WeaSkedthem
toapproveofintroducingecotourismornot.Thisresultis
asfoElows,”Strongagree‖;38%(180f47respondents),
l’Agree”;57%(270f47respondents),l’Neutral’’;5%
(2of47respondents),andtherewas no respondent
Whodisagreed,Wethinktherewerefewpeoplewho
disagree to rationalecotourism,butthe method of
explanationwasnotgoodtohaveacEearresult・Therefore
Weinterviewed the reasonwhytheIocalpeopleagree
toecotourism(Fig,4).」nconsequence】themostopinion
0 0 ∩)
ごU「【J4
(一)¢叫βu¢‖こ川岩
Very Good Good Neutn〕 Bad Ven′Bad
句.3 〃le/℃SU/f50r納eJoc∂/peoJつJe仰=4刀byねe伽9∂bouf納e′1a血相/e/11〝m〃meJ了亡a/1d納eeco/?OJmC
cond/r由〃/∩仇eん佃nn∂//ざJ∂nd∂re∂,
Of41respondents),17%(70f41respondents)and
20%(80f41respondents)respectivery.These results
SUggeStthatthelocalpeopEeintheMannailslandarea
hadhighlevelofenvironmentalperceptiongeneraIry.
Fig.6showstheresultofthequestion;”Doyou
Prefertogetthejobrelatedtoecotourism?’14%(20f45
respondents),89%(400f45respondents)and7%(30f
45respondents)answered”Asa mainjob’’,’’Asaside
job’1and■一Donltwantlr respectively.According to this
result,mOStlocalpeoplewere afavorofanothe「job,
buttheyareofnomindtochangetheirjob.
WaS”Becauseofenvironmentalconservation”;58%(20
0f34respondents)and thesecond mostopinionwas
’■Because of economic developmentrl;15%(50f34
respondents).Theotheropinionswere■’Becauseof
good effecton both environmentaland economic”.”No
SPeCialreaSOn”】both percentages ofwhich are6%(2
0f34respondents),
Additionally.weaskedthemwhatyouexpectfrom
ecotourism(Fig.5),The percentages ofMAppropriate
COnSerVation ofnaturarenvironment’’.’’EconomicdeveI-
OPmentfrom enhanced employment”and”Educationor
Learningaboutnaturalenvironment”wereeach46%(19
-
77
Envimnm.rntal
con応托Ir>篭tion
58■
句.4 Sum「れ∂γOr納e/℃∂50nⅣわy〟1e/oc∂/peoI)Je什ド34ノ∂g帽eわecofou/循m.
ConlmLr川CatiDnW【thl:eOPrefmm
Otb「日間8n]0⊃しl止Ⅳ
12%
Ap叩Pパ虞e00「盲er伯ti[】nOfr白山ヨr
-、n-■Tll「†Tl寸
ノ竹ヽ Eロmmcd⊇\佗lopT紀州fmm
enh∋n正de「nproyn’灯「【
17%
Edu⊂8tiロ∩ロ「le臼ln「優射m止mtし旧
eml旧l「me止
2口先
R9.5 Summ∂γOr〝わ∂f納eノoc∂/peop/e(∩=4りeよpeC′わmecofou〟sm
No Yesm;l】njob
7% 4%
\′esSdejロb
89%
勒6me/℃5U/′of納equesぬ∩ノ‘poyoup帽由rfo9e=椚eカb帽/∂fedfoecofou′椅m?’;わr肋e/oc∂Jpeop/e(n=咽
important,eVenthough compa「lngWith the economic
development.Additiona”yregardedtothequestionabout
introducingofecotourism,manylocalpeoplehavethe
answers concerned with environmentalconselVation.1t
can be concludedthatthe rocalpeople had enough
environmental awareness and tended to regard
environmentalconservation asimportantmorethan
tour弓sts d弓d.
lnthisMannailsLandarea.itisreportedthatsea
turtlesarefrequentbutrarelycometoshoreforlaylng・
CONCLUS10N
lbdate,Rayong provincehas beenworkingas
thetouristspotswhichsellsthenaturalenvironmentand
manytouristsvisittheretoen」Oythebeautifulseaand
thesandybeach・lnsuchconditions】itwasprospected
thatthelocalpeopleatRayonghaveahighleve10fenvト
ronmentalawareness.1nthissurvey,alotof[ocalpeople
havetheop■nionthattheenvironmentalconservationis
-
7∂
Most10Calpeopleandthetouristsdid nothavea bad
impression onseaturtIeswhich usuallyhave noreFa-
tionshiptothem.and understoodthe seaturtles are
endangerspecies.Theseawarenessandtheknowledge
Ofthemcanbebroughtfromtheaquariumandthemedia
SuChlikeTVandmagazines.Manyrespondentsregarded
thedecreaseoftheseaturtEesasserious.and sothey
favoredtheactivityfortheconservationoftheseatur[les.
Manyanswers aboutthe reason why sea tuTtleswere
decreaslng are abstract,and onlyfew respondents
excepttheflShermenunderstoodthereasonofseatu州els
COnCrete decrease.Thereforethe resultofthis survey
SeenlStOindicatetheslgnificanceoftheeducationabout
theenvironmentandtheseaturtles,andforthispurpose,
we could reconfirm the availability of developing on
ecotourism.
Thelocalpeoplefeltthe environmentaland
economicconditionsintheMannailslandareaaregoodfor
themostpart.AsCampbe”(2002)said,Eocalperceptions
Wi”beimportantfactorin promotingtodevelopon the
ecotourism.0n the basisofthis concept,thefactthat
thelocalpeoplefeelgoodabouttheenvironmentaland
economicconditionwon■tfueltheirmotivationsomuchto
Participateinecotourism.
Additionarly,COnSideringthemainmotivationof
localparticipationis theeconomiccondition.the TeSult
thatmostlocarpeoplewantedtobeinvoIvedinthemain
joborthesidejobrelatedtoecotourismhastheimportant
slgnificance.FromtheresuFtofthisresearch,thelocal
PeOPletendedtohavefurtherincome,butnotwantany
life-alteringrisk,Thisimpliesthatthedincultyinintroducing
ecotourismintothe MannailsLand area,becausetheir
hopefornotalteringthepresentlifecouEdmotivatethem
toavoidnewthings.1bmaketheIocalpeopletobewill-
ingtodeve10PeCOtOurism bythemselves,eCOtOUrism
Wilrhavetobesomethingappealingthattheycanbeneflt
from.Therefore,Whenwewilldevelopthesea turtle
ecotouism,WhetherwecanmakeaprograrTIWhichgives
anotherjobthattheLocalpeoplewant(forexample,the
ShorttimejobwhichwecanemploymanylocalpeopLe)
tothem canbethekeytothesuccessofecotDurism.
And when the sea turtle ecotourismis deveIoped,tO
investigatehowIoca[favorableperceptionand awareness
towardecotourisrnconnecttotheirparticipationwiElbea
nextissue,
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author’s researchis suppo止ed byaElofthe
members ofthe Sea Turtle Conservation Station.
REFERENCE
Campbe”,L,M.1999.Ecotourisnlinruraldevelopingcommunities.AnnaJsofTouITSmReseaITh26(3):534-553.
Campbe”,L,M.2002.Conservation narratives and the.’received wisdom”ofecotourism:CaSe Studiesfrom Costa
Rica./〃femafroJ?8/Joum∂Jorsu5ね/〃∂b/e亡)eve/oJ)menf5:300-325.
Godfrey,M.H.&Drif,0.2001.GuestEditorialDevelopingSeaTurtleEcDtOurisminFrenchGuiana:Perilsand
Practicalities.〟∂〟ne九J〟/e〈Je〝ざ/effer91:1-4.
Johnson,S.A.,K.A.Bjorndal,andA.B.Bolten,1996.Asurveyoforganizedturtlewatchparticipantsonseaturtre
nestingbeachesin Florida.Che/onianConservat(OnandBiology,2,60-65.
Maita・A・,2001・AhistoricarstudyonthedeflnitionoftheEcotourismanditsformofconcept(inJapanese).Thetotal
reJつOJ†or亡coねU/5m,15-40.
Marcovaldi,Nl・,Marcovaldi,G,G・1999・Marineturt[esofBrazil:thehistoIYandstructureofProjetolnMAR-EBAMA.
8/oJo9/c∂/Con5eⅣ∂f/oJ?91:35-41.
Ross,S・,Wa”,G,1999・Ecotourism:tOWardscongruencebetweentheoryandpractice.7bunsmManagement20:
123-132.
Scheyvens,R・1999・CasestudylEcotourismandtheempowermentof10Calcommunities・7bunsmManagement
20:245-249.
1burismAuthorityofThailand,2002・lburism Statisticsin Rayong,
Wilson,C・,TisdellJC・2001・SeaturtlesasanonLCOnSUmPtivetourismresourceespecia”yinAustralia.1burism
Management22ニ279-288.
Ziffer!K・1g89・Ecotourism=Theuneasyalliance▲WorkingPaperSeries.Washington,DC:ConservationrnterTlational.