TN wz 41413T5TO 1. _

2. 2013

ffT

31

3 TT FT

ft rfPiiq . tif WTGTti 3Tf D1T, qRTR 3fTqzf fpr

fuf-q : 31.07.2017 fM

1. 3I9{2 Z TT 3T#A -\3q ? zfff(3TT), rrf ( "ar &f 1 r) ii

Trt *, f Z fffrf 3Tt,

9TTñ (f -PTT 3rftT' TT n) iT t[ftf

f1fzTT, 2003 ( 311 "&TfRpT" 5f 1Trr) zTt iicr 26 E 55 3Tft TfT 'j rftr

111/19.11.12 30.11.11 2006-07 65,575 36,065 1,31,150 LZO13 112/19.11.12 30.11.1 to 93,517 40,212 1,87,034 2. NT IuJ

3.

14.10.2008/14.07.2009 fzu TIT fj ffDT 3TfffF qj f JT 4 TT I5T fHT t[TJ Ff

3TT1ctut ig cbT9 W 12.5

5tT ft1r t!

4 3ff7 1T ffcTU q5T 3T tIrT T1T f rT 1 I1T 9T uTg I JJ ii

1 6 I &i

12.5 ffIIT T *, 7qf Z2T{ UM 4 VRMff

3ff1 WTTJT TFT I 1TffT

2

- 2 - 31HT133t4

14 TJ 9T cT RT f5 ji tff?4 j g 1 / 9T TT 1TT tff

fRic ei-fq ftht3T 3ff rt 'Prosecutor should not be judge' 31RuIr ff I.. JcJ 1]9T9ft ZJ

5 ff1U 3ffT CIT fr 45T 13T di f T1J f5 cj) T 4 zw T1T fj

, ii1 iu

t—T 1f[ TT 154 TFt g, 1II

9g z —tf &rfl 3I4 14 ij

quj Z5 9 tft

rflJ ffM tff f{ f1T 3Tfr

ILT 26 ZF 55 Z hIT F1 f

f fic , zrfr TT 3I' 3Q)4 3T1 3Tt1ZT 3ff51t

Tft[t zm T

r zzrf 1c ii & frf 83 j 1

6. I

7.

WqU\ 30 tM 3ff 1H fI f5T 1T fcFM 'TT

t 163 'Sugar Candy made of sugar and

glucose but excluding coco' 37T 3t Zl 31R t 3I

#fftff T5 3TT q11T 5J7 * fFJ 3ffTqf5

3-2f 1I 154

'Confectionery excluding choclate' 2ft, 08.05.2006 3{1.1ENT T

etT)7 Excluding branded Confectionery 3IT [2T f9TEf 01.06.2006

-1J 163 3IT 'Sugar Candy made of sugar and glucose but excluding coco'

TT

irr . TZIJ I 3— fft T1J 163 # All type of sugar candy

* T 'Coco' * I T1F Sugar Candies

made of Sugar and glucose and containg Flavours. Creame and colors

fi * I fi

90 3Tf5 TR TZlT ZlT f:~Mlzr Gurudevdutta Vksss Margyadit and thers Vs. State of Maharashtra and others 2001

... ..........................3

r- .

- 3 - 3I t) t T 33 34Z2013/ w—fftg 1

(004) SSC - 0534(SC) Z15T kci '3cRci fzni fzir 1

Flavouring Substances, Ernulisifiers and colorants tM t I fT[ 3TfTqE

MFT IT TI 1993 tzRi 32 4T9— 1 f 90

tPTT JITS b1 cbcht , flT * I fi &R1tvt 3IIT4ci ZI5T TM 12—V,3IkL TT 31TT f1Icb 02.01.1989

3Icp T11 T ki Lozenges Tofee qt tt Tftct1T9T

'uNit 74 fThT T 4 0dNi1 *1

c1 Z

1T

I. [Supreme Court of India] Frick India Limited Vs State of Haryana May 13, 1994. 2. [In The Supreme Court of India] (2009) VST 249 (SC) Sree Krishna Electricals Vs

State of Tamil Nadu April 21, 2009 3. [Supreme Court of India] J.K. Synthetics Ltd. Vs Comm. Taxes Officer (C.A. Nos.

3414 to 3416 of 1982) Birla Cement Works Vs State of Rajasthan May 9, 1994. 4. [2012] 51 VST 130(Mad) [In The High Court] Cadbury India Limited Vs Assisstant

Commissioner (CT), Chcnnai July, 2009 5. [In The High Court of Karnataka At Bangalore] Kundanamal Ganeshmal And

Borthers Vs State of Karnataka February 12, 1993. 6. [2012] 48 VST 107 (AP) [In The Andhra Pradesh High Court] Banyan Enterprises

Vs Commercial Tax Officer August 24, 2011. 7. [2017] 98 VST 172 (Bom.) [In The Bombay High Court] Zarnil Steel Buildings

India Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra December 23, 2016 8. [In The High Court of Rajasthan At Jodhpur] Black Stone Rubber Industries Pvt.

Ltd. Vs State of Rajasthan February 19, 2001. 9. [2011] 39 VST 184(All) [In The Allahabad High Court] Kesar Enterprises Ltd. Vs

State of U.P. August 27, 2010/ 10. [2011] 43 VST 222(All) [In The Allahabad 1-ugh Court] Dabur India Limited Vs

State of U.P. December 6, 20 10/ 11. [In The Allahabad High Court 1-larbans Lai Maihotra Vs Assistant Commissioner

Ghaziabad July 28, 1994 12. [In The High Court of Kerala At Ernakulami New Prasanthi Automobiles Co. Vs

State of Kerala Sepetember 26, 1992. 13. Reportes of Sales Fax Cases Vol. 146 2006 [High Court of Madhya Pradesh]

Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Indore Vs Modern Agency October 25, 2004. 14. [In The High court of Rajasthan] Jaipur Bench Cycle Hatt of Jaipur Vs The Board

of Revenue May, 13, 1977. 15. [2007] 5 VST 197 (All) [In The Allahabad 1-ugh Court] Carbon Crafts Pvt. Ltd. Vs

state of U.P. December 13, 2005. 16. In The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur Commercial Taxes

Officer Vs Ms Heera Lai Murlidhar Bikaner Date July 2, 1992.

3T[: Z5 ffi T5T I

I 1R................4

- 4 - 3fet *I'54t 33 T 34/2013/9ij

8. 'I'jTcT 1 {I'f Ij1c 3I11TEI5 Pk-j 1r f rj

1-Ih-i -ik T3H-F1 '-.lNIFc'1RT, NT iiiRci fV1ZT

f~-ifO 17.02.2017

r 4i l-ô I EfrI III 5T P" °I I 473/ 2011 t[ 3PZJ

3T -"-1I-lIc4 i-j jzi1 tf 3T1 flu cp.j.)

ft friff i1i ii tq Wrf~T q i q610 f~m

3: iii-ik 3T JT IRc1 fM uf

Elc1dI \3- 3T cp{ c T[ 1rT fT I

9 FT ?fT 4) c TT3t 5T

3TZT4FI f Tfl u j f z * f c

fl1ci ElI c CTh1' tflc * ff1T 3ffF

T 1Ct 11ET TF qMT fl5 i fj f T1T1*J

10. c J J 311 ci') e ctti &ffz 31—Iv

E 163 "Sugar Canday made of sugar & Glucose but excluding coco"

31 5 WRId 4)dI J TrRq Sugar and Glucose 3I1ThT 3T

Iffiflt it Mixing and Blending Ri

1T d 1Tf Sugar Candy 9tl5 ElIU 4)NI T f Tii * f-u 3I4) 3ffT FT

ff 4) T{ fcci f) ju cp )

1IiVT ffRT c ici')t.j &rftt g'.'1ccj c1IR'icPIdI\ cjt.uI ffl *, * I 1I-i-T TI] 34

'I1kfT, 'im r2zui tR I,4IIc1 ccIi IF

ds1I 473/2011 #W4 y) k wofro, 'ii r ar rpi

(3I4) 3J 1Iu11 f~t{4 17.02.2017 f TJ ffUfZT

fct

my view, applying the common parlance test which has been held appropriate by the Apex court time and again in matters like this, the products in which the assessee are dealing, are certainly branded toffees. Taking into consideration the aforesaid reasoning of the Apex court as well as by this court (supra), in my view the finding reached by all the three authorityes in unision is well reasoned and no interference is required to be taken into consideration and accordingly while the tax is upheld and consequently the interest being consequential, is also upheld."

ci II.................... 5

- 5 - 31t1c4 *1U 33 V4 34J2013/9ii

1Ii NI4 5T jq)ctc1Uf!4 3Tq'fM2ff cxlc{T TT It)c1 /' -ff

vq,TRr Trr f4cA * 1-1T # ' , 1II 1JcI ,1cUI Iu1c1: flT

'rJI *1 T IT 1Th1 3T I-1k qM 61

31k'lR1c1 iiRci 'ii i-ilg 1c11tz4 lNIe11 * IctQ11 -H

3fftf 1Ir 3F4 (2009) 23 VST 249 (SC) ict 3IT1q 3H1*cI cl

12. cmqffN -cT)7 fTfUT &fWF TT 31 I ') Ri I iT

'such t 74 III-c1 qt 3-IYI*cl 1bii 'ihicil ti

13. 41UII4j*c1 ,Ll oqcI' RT W*cc1 tf1 3LM 3i11Ic, *4ii uiicll ti

t 74 wrftu u5't31yI*c1 1I suIcfftI

Riu1 1TZITI

( ( 12

(.tfii) 1c*1