to study the lending practices of … banks also provide the facility of current as well as saving...
TRANSCRIPT
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 159
TO STUDY THE LENDING PRACTICES OF
COOPERATIVE BANKS IN INDIA
1.Yasmeen Banu
2.Dr. Varun Kumar
1.
Research Scholar , Arunachal University of Studies, Arunachal Pradesh, Namsai, Arunachal Pradesh, India 2.
Research Supervisor, Arunachal University of Studies ,Arunachal Pradesh, Namsai, Arunachal Pradesh, India
Abstract
Banking industry is growing at a rapid speed world-wide. This industry plays a meaningful
contribution in economic development. Banking business is so popular where a person
deposits money for saving and that same money is lended to another person. Thus, flow of
money is continuous. In the absence of banking business, the entrepreneurs would not be in
the position to get enough money to survive in the competitive market. Cooperative movement
was initiated by Indian government in 1904. The basic objective of this movement is to
develop the cooperatives so that they can make important contribution to the economy of the
nation. A cooperative credit system has been built by these cooperative banks and financial
aid is provided to the cooperatives. The current article highlights the lending practices of
cooperative banks.
Keywords: Bank, Cooperative, Lent, NABARD
Introduction
Cooperative Banks are small-size units located in Rural and Urban areas. The financial
service of these banks in rural region includes providing loan for farming, land, cattle, crops
etc. Whereas, the main function of these banks in urban area is to provide funds to Small
scale Industries, Cottage Industries, Micro business and Entrepreneurs.
Cooperative Banks also provide the facility of current as well as saving accounts for the
customers. Their banking services are not supposed to be better than private sector banks but
they are much better as compared to public sector banks.
Cooperative Banks provide loans to the customers. Proper record of the loan holders is kept
by the bank. If a customer or entrepreneur does not return the borrowed money on time then
appropriate steps are taken by the banks to recover the amount. In this case, the account of
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 160
the indebted persons or entrepreneurs is blocked and their properties are seized by the banks
to recover the borrowed money as per law.
Cooperative Banks provide loans from small range to higher one. It is reported that most of
the clients take the loan of above 1 lakh on average. The study also suggests that in most of
the cases, the loan is taken for more than three years.
It is also observed that cooperative banks provide reasonable interest rates to the customers
and it encourages them to take loan. When a comparison is made between Public Sector
Banks and Co-operative Banks regarding documentation process it is found that these is less
documentation process in Co-operation Banks. Majority customers are taking house loan and
personal loan as compared to education or vehicle loan.
Also, Cooperative Banks provide easy methods of repayments of the loan so it looks quite
comfortable for the client to take loan from these banks. The average time of processing of
loan in these banks is found to be 7 days generally. These are some reasons which show why
Co-operative Banks are preferred by the customers in comparison with public and private
sector banks.
Objectives of the Study
The objectives of the current research work are as follows:
1. To know the lending practices and policies of cooperative banks in India.
2. To measure and compare the types of loans and the efficiency of Cooperative Banks
in this regard.
3. To suggest ways for the improvement of the efficiency of Cooperative banks.
4. To know the satisfaction level of the Cooperative Bank’s customers.
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 161
Review of the Literature
After various studies and number of suggestions were sought out to bring effectiveness in the
working and operations of the Cooperative financial institutions. In the year 1991 Narsimham
Committee emphasized on capital adequacy and liquidity, in 1995 Padamanabhan
Committee, suggested CAMEL rating in the form of rations to evaluate financial and
operational efficiency, in 1997 Tarapore Committee examined Non-performing assets and
assets quality, in 1998 Kannan Committee gave opinion on working capital and lending
modes, in 1998 and also revised in 2001 Basel Committee recommended capital adequacy
norms and risk management measures. Many experts suggested various tools and techniques
for effective analysis and interpretation of the financial and operational aspects of the
Cooperative Banks.
Jain(2001) has done a comparative performance analysis of District Central Cooperative
Banks (DCCBs) of western India, namely, Maharashtra, Gujarat and Rajasthan and found
DCCBs of Rajasthan performed much better in profitability and liquidity as compared to
Gujarat and Maharashtra. Singh and Singh (2006) studied on Funds Management in DCCBs
of Punjab with special reference to analysis of financial margin. It noted that higher
performance of own funds and the recovery concerns have resulted in increasing margin to
the Cooperative Banks. Mavaluri, Boppana and Nagarjuna (2006) suggested that
performance of banking in terms of probability, productivity, asset quality and financial
management has become important to stable the economy. They found that public sector
banks have been more efficient than other banks operating in India. Pal and Malik (2007)
investigated the differences in the financial characteristics of 74 banks in India based on
factors, such as profitability, liquidity, risk and efficiency. It is suggested that foreign banks
were better performers, as compared to other two categories of banks, in general and in terms
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 162
of utilization of resources in particular. Andrew Campbell (2007) focused on the
relationship between Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) and bank failure and argued for an
effective bank insolvency law for the prevention and control of NPLs for developing and
transitional economies as these have been suffering severe problems due to NPLs.
Singla (2008) emphasized on financial management and examined the financial position of
sixteen banks by considering profitability, capital adequacy, adopt-equity and NPA. Dutta
and Basak (2008) suggested that co-operative bank should improve there recovery
performance, adopt new system of computerized monitoring of loans, implement proper
prudential norms and organize regular workshops to sustain in the competitive banking
environment. Chander and Chandel (2010) analyzed the financial efficiency and viability of
HARCO bank and found poor performance of the bank on capital adequacy, liquidity,
earning quality and the management efficiency parameters.
Research Methodology
Descriptive research is used in this study in order to identify the lending practices of bank and
determining customer’s level of satisfaction. The method used was questionnaire and
interview of the experienced loan officers.
Primary Data
a. Interview Method
c. Structured Questionnaire
Secondary Data
a. Annual reports of the bank
b. Manual of instructions on loans and advances
c. Books
d. Articles and Research Papers
e. Websites
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 163
Sample Unit
Sample respondents comprising of agricultural farmers, Traders, Employees and others etc,
and sampling unit for study was Individual Customers
Sample Size
To get the opinion from the customers, a sample of 250 customers were selected basing on
convenient sampling.
5. Data Analysis and Interpretation
Table 1: Preferences of the customers for the loans
Modes of Loan No. of Respondent Percentage (%)
House Loan 70 33%
Personal Loan 63 30%
Consumer Loan 24 11%
Educational Loan 33 16%
Vehicle Loan 12 6%
Other 8 4%
Total 210
Figure 1: Preferences of the customers for the loans
33%
30%11%
16%
6% 4%
Prefernces of the Customers for the Loans
House Loan
Personal Loan
Consumer Loan
Educational Loan
Vehicle Loan
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 164
Interpretation: Present study reveals that majority of the respondents have taken house loans
& personal loans and less respondents prefer consumer, educational loan and vehicle loans.
Table: 2 Range of the Loans of Amount
Loan Amount No. of Respondent Percentage (%)
Less than 20,000 17 8
20,000 - 50,000 64 30
50,000 - 1 lakh 13 6
More than 1 Lakh 116 55
Total 210
Figure 2: Range of the amount of loans
Interpretation : Study reveals that 8 % respondent prefer loan less than 20,000, 20 %
respondents prefer 20,000 to 50,000,12 % prefer more than 1 lakh and 60% of the
respondents prefer more than 1 lakh.
8%
31%
6%
55%
Range of the amount of Loans
Less than 20,000
20,000 - 50,000
50,000 - 1 lakh
More than 1 Lakh
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 165
Table :3 Preferable Term of Loan
Term of Loan No. of Respondent Percentage (%)
Less than 1 year 25 12%
1 to 3 years 38 18%
more than 3 years 147 70%
Total 210
Figure 3: Preferable term of Loan
Interpretation: Study shows that 70 % respondents take loan for more than 3 years, 18 %
take loan for 1 to 3 years and 12% take loan for the period of less than 1 year.
Table: 4 Factors prompted the customers to take loan from
Cooperative Banks
Reason for taking loan No. of Respondent Percentage (%)
Rate of Interest 25 12
No. of Schemes 28 13
Less Formalities 59 28
12%
18%
70%
Preferable Term of Loan
Less than 1 year
1 to 3 years
more than 3 years
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 166
Easy payment 84 40
Any other 14 7
Total 210
Figure 4: Factors promoted the customers to take loan from Cooperative
Banks
Interpretation: Study reveals that 40 % take loan because banks provide easy payment, 28%
take loans because of less formality and other respondents take loan because of reasonable
rate of interest, more schemes.
Table:5 Average time taken for processing of Loan
Average time for processing loan No. of Respondent Percentage (%)
Less than 7 days 147 70%
Between 7 to 14 days 42 20%
More than 14 days 21 10%
Total 210
12%
13%
28%
40%
7%
Factors prompted the customers to take loan from Co-operative Banks
Rate of Interest
No. of Schemes
Less Formalities
Easy payment
Any other
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 167
Figure 5: Average time taken for the processing of the loan
Interpretation: Study reveals that 70% respondents says that average time taken for
processing of the loan is less than 7 days, 20% says that it takes 7 – 14 days and 10% says
that it takes more than 14 days.
Table 6: Ranking facilities provided by the Cooperative Banks
Ranks the facility No. of Respondent Percentage (%)
Above Average 76 36%
Average 126 60%
Below Average 8 4%
Total 210
Figure 6: Ranking facilities provided by the Cooperative Banks
70%
20%
10%
Average time taken for processing Loan
Less than 7 days
Between 7 to 14 days
More than 14 days
36%
60%
4%
Average time take for processing Loan
Above Average
Average
Below Average
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 168
Interpretation: Study shows that 60% of the respondent says that facility provided by the
bank are average, 36% say that its above average and 4% says that its below average.
Table 7: Customer’s ranking service of the Bank
Rank the Customer Services No. of Respondent Percentage (%)
Excellent 63 30
Good 118 56
Average 21 10
Poor 8 4
Total 210
Figure 7: Customer’s ranking service of Bank
Interpretation: Study shows that 56% of the respondents says that customer service of the
bank is good, 30% says that it is excellent and another 10 % says its average and only 4 %
says its poor.
Table 8: Satisfaction of the customers with the loan and period of installment
Appropraiate Answers No. of Respondent Percentage (%)
30%
56%
10%
4%
Customer's ranking service of Bank
Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 169
Yes 147 70
No 34 16
Can't say 29 14
Total 210
Interpretation: Study reveals that 70% are satisfied with the amount and period of
installment, 16 % are not satisfied and 14 % can’t say.
Table 9: Preferable banks for borrowing loan facilities
Preferable Banks in future No. of Respondent Percentage (%)
Public Banks 21 10
Private Banks 71 34
Cooperative Banks 118 56
Total 210
70%
16%
14%
Satisfaction of the customers with the Loan & Period of installment
Yes
No
Can't say
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 170
Figure 9: Preferable banks for borrowing loan facilities
Interpretation: Study shows that 56 % of the respondents will prefer loans from co-
operative banks, 34 % from the private banks and 10 % from the public banks
Table 10: Customers who would like to refer the Cooperative Banks to their Friends
and Relatives
Banks refers to others No. of Respondent Percentage (%)
Always 168 80
Sometime 34 16
Never 8 4
Total 210
Figure 10: Customers who would like to refer the Cooperative Banks to their Friends
and Relatives
10%
34%56%
Preferable banks for Borrowing Loan Facilities
Public Banks
Private Banks
Cooperative Banks
80%
16% 4%
Customers who would like to refer the Co-operative Banks to their
Friends & Relative
Always
Sometime
Never
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 171
Interpretation: 80% of the respondents would like to refer the bank to their friends and
relatives which shows that they are satisfied from the services and lending practices of the
bank.
6. Findings of the Study
1.As per the study 33% majority of respondent were prefer housing loan from this bank.
2. Round 70% of the respondent prefer to take long term loans which is more than 3 years.
3.Simple procedure followed by bank for loan.
4.Easy payment and less formalities are the main factors determining to the customer’s for
selection of loans.
5. Customers are satisfied with the mode of payment of installment.
6. Average time for the processing of loan is less i.e. 7 days approx.
7. Suggestions
1. The banks should adopt the modern methods of banking like internet banking, Mobile
Banking, Credit cards, ATM, etc.
2. The banks should plan to introduce new schemes every year to for attracting new
customers and satisfying the present ones.
3. The banks should plan for expansion of branches as and when required.
4. The banks should enlighten the customers regarding their services and new schemes.
8. Limitations
1. The study is based on the data of past four years only.
2. The data for study mainly based on a single bank.
3. As majority of the customers are employees of the bank, they might be biased in giving the
information
4. The time period of the research was limited.
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 172
9. References
[1] Andrew Campbell (2011), "Bank insolvency and the problem of nonperforming loans",
Journal of Banking Regulation, 25-45.
[2] Beaver, W. H. (2012), "Financial ratios as predictor of failure-empirical research in
accounting", Journal of Accounting Research, No. 4, 71-111.
[3] Bhaskaran R and Praful Josh P (2010), “Non Performing Assets (NPAs) in Co-operative
Rural Financial System: A major challenge to rural development”, BIRD‟s Eye View
Dec.2010.
[4] Chander Ramesh and Chandel Jai Kishan (2010), “Financial Viability of an Apex
Cooperative Credit Institution- A Case Study of the HARCO Bank”, Asia-Pacific Business
Review Vol. VI, No.2, April-June 2010, pp 61-70
[5] Chandra, Buddhadeb (2013), “Performance of Burdwan Central Cooperative Bank in the
Development of the District”, Finance India, September, 2013.
[6] Dutta Uttam and Basak Amit (2011), “Appraisal of financial performance of urban
cooperative banks- a case study.” The Management Accountant, case study, March 2008,
170-174.
[7] Fulbag Singh and Balwinder Singh (2012), "Funds management in the central cooperative
banks of Punjab- an analysis of financial margin", The ICFAI Journal of Management, Vol.
5, 74-80.
[8] Geeta Sharma and Ganesh Kawadia (2013), "Efficiency of urban cooperative banks of
Maharashtra: A DEA Analysis", The ICFAI Journal of Management, Vol. 5, Issue 4.
[9] Harish Kumar Singla (2012), "Financial performance of banks in India", The ICFAI
Journal of Management, Vol. 7, Issue 1.
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
UGC APPROVED JOURNAL (Number-63082)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 05 - Issue 02 || February-2018 || PP. 159-173
www.ijaetmas.com Page 173
[10] Jain (2001),“Comparative study of performance of District Central Cooperative Banks
(DCCBs) of Western India i.e. Maharashtra, Gujarat & Rajasthan for the year 2009-2010
from the point of view of net profit/loss”, NAFSCOB Bulletin, April-June 2011.