tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

46
ICD Revision Overview Internal Medicine TAG 2012 Dr. T. Bedirhan Üstün Coordinator, Classifications, Terminologies, Standards. World Health Organization

Upload: bedirhan-ustun

Post on 07-May-2015

1.490 views

Category:

Technology


2 download

DESCRIPTION

WHO is revising the ICD to be completed by 2015. It is going to enter into a Beta phase by 2012 May during which all stakeholders could see and comment on the ICD as well as propose changes, test in practice.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

ICD Revision OverviewInternal Medicine TAG 2012

Dr. T. Bedirhan Üstün

Coordinator, Classifications, Terminologies, Standards.

World Health Organization

Page 2: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)
Page 3: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Key Issues

• ICD revision is complex– Multiple: uses/purposes; histories; principles/styles…

• Dimensions: deaths, diseases, risk factors, disability, treatments, … • Science and Practice needs: genes, patient care, population health …

Fragmented Information integration is needed

• ICD has to be re-engineered as a digital system– IT sector, economics, governments, international regulations– Information Systems Formal representation of Biomedical Knowledge

Common Exchange platform for Health Information Systems

• Multiple stakeholders are involved: Policymakers; Providers; Clients;– a common language is needed

ICD needs to be built jointly

Page 4: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Construction of ICD-10: Revision Process in 20th Century

• 8 Annual Revision Conferences (1982 - 89)

• 17 – 58 Countries participated– 1- 5 person delegations– mainly Health Statisticians

• Manual curation– List exchange– Index was done later

• "Decibel" ? Method of discussion• Output: Paper Copy• Work in English only• Limited testing in the field

Page 5: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Construction of ICD-11: Revision Process in the 21st Century

• Internet-based permanent platform – All year round – Open to all people in a structured way– Content experts focus

• Digital curation– Wiki enabled collaboration– Ontology based

• Enhanced discussion & peer review – TAGs serve as the editorial group

• Electronic copy print version

• Work in multiple languages

• Planned field tests – Based on Use Cases

Page 6: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

How do we go from Here to 21st Century?

Page 7: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

ICD-11 Timeline

• 2011 : Alpha version ( ICD 11 alpha draft) – +1 YR : Commentaries and consultations

• 2012 : Beta version & Field Trials Version – +2 YR : Field trials

• 2014 : Final version for public viewing–2015 : WHA Approval

• 2015+ implementation

Page 8: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

http://who.int/classifications

ICD Revision

Page 9: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

ICD11 αlpha http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/revision

• Alpha – Browser & Print 10 look & feel + descriptions – code structure !

• ICD-11 alpha draft is INCOMPLETE • updated on a daily basis• NOT TO BE USED for CODING at this stage• not yet been approved by the TAGs, RSG or

WHO

Page 10: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

iCAT• Open and Collaborative Platform

– Web based

– Like WIKI – Trip Advisor• But structured

– by the Content Model

• Editorial Oversight– by the TAGs

iCATCollaborative Authoring Tool

for ICD Revision

Page 11: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

THE CONTENT MODELRequired Parameters:

Any Category in ICD is represented by:

1. TITLE of ENTITY: Name of disease, disorder, syndrome…

2. Classification Properties

3. Textual definition

4. Terms: Synonyms - Inclusion – Exclusion - Index terms

5. Body System(s) / Part(s)

6. Temporal Properties

7. Severity Properties

Page 12: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

THE CONTENT MODELOptional Parameters:

8. Manifestation Properties

9.   Causal Properties

10. Functioning Properties

11. Specific Condition Properties

12.    Treatment Properties

13.    Diagnostic Criteria

Page 13: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Browsing ICD Entities

Page 14: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Advanced Search

Page 15: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

OpenID Logon

Page 16: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

User Profile

Page 17: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Threaded Comments

Page 18: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Single Assessment Questions

Page 19: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)
Page 20: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)
Page 21: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Suggesting Definitions

Page 22: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Comments

Page 23: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Dashboard (Foundation)

Page 24: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

24

ICD-11 Features

Internet Based Platform

Content Model

Multi Lingual Representations

Definitions

Input from all Stakeholders

Arabic لعربية 官话 ChineseEnglish EnglishFrançais FrenchРусский язык Russian Español Spanish Deutsch German Português Portuguese

Field Trials for Use Cases

Electronic Health Record Ready

Page 25: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Information Notes: Yellow Sheets

1. Communication & Dissemination

2. Revision Timelines

3. TAG Allocations

4. Content Model

5. Foundation Component & Linearizations

6. Legacy Linearizations

7. Code Structure

8. Multidimensional Coding

9. Index

10. < …>

Page 26: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

ICD11 Components

26

Foundation: ICD categories with

- Definitions, synonyms- Clinical descriptions- Diagnostic criteria- Causal mechanism- Functional Properties

Find Term

SNOMED-CT, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)…

Linearizations

Mortality

Morbidity

Primary Care

Page 27: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

The ICD Foundation Component

• is a collection of ALL ICD entities like diseases, disorders...  

• It represents the whole ICD universe.

• In a simple way, the foundation component is similar to a “store” of books or songs. 

• From these elements we build a selection as a linearization.

• This analogy may however be misleading because there are many links between the ICD entities (like parent-child relations and other).

 • The ICD entities in the Foundation Component:

• are not necessarily mutually exclusive• allow multiple parenting ( i. e. an entity  may be

in more than one branch, for example tuberculosis meningitis is both an infection and a brain disease)

Page 28: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

ICD11 Code Structure Information Note 7 – under SEG Consideration

• Default ICD Code format:

E1D213 .E4E5E: base 34 (0-9; A-Z caps – less I, O)

D: base 26 (A-Z caps caps – less I, O)

1: base 10 integers (0-9)

• Optimum expressive space– Block and chapters not included in design – but accommodated

• E1D213 = Same pre-coordinated set for mortality, morbidity– Russian Dolls – Telescopic expansion

Page 29: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

ICD Multi-dimensional CodingInformation Note 8 – under SEG Consideration

• Representing qualifiers by post-coordination

• E1D213 .E4E5

• Agreed Multiple Dimensions will include:

• Anatomic detail, including Laterality

• Severity

• Temporality

• Causal agent/etiology

Page 30: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Issue of Pre-coordinated Categories:Coding cycling accident in ICD-10

• V12.24 Pedal cyclist injured in collision with two- or three-wheeled motor vehicle, unspecified pedal cyclist, non-traffic accident, while resting, sleeping, eating or engaging in other vital activities

Page 31: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

The history of cycling codes

• 1972 ICD-9 (E826): 8 codes

• READ-2 (T30..): 81 codes

• READ-3: 87: 82 codes

• 1999 ICD-10: 587 codes

Page 32: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Defusing the exploding bicycle:

500 codes in pieces• 10 things to hit…

– Pedestrian / cycle / motorbike / car / HGV / train / unpowered vehicle / a tree / other

• 5 roles for the injured…– Driving / passenger / cyclist / getting in / other

• 5 activities when injured…– resting / at work / sporting / at leisure / other

• 2 contexts…– In traffic / not in traffic

V12.24 Pedal cyclist injured in collision with two- or three-wheeled motor vehicle, unspecified pedal cyclist, nontraffic accident, while resting, sleeping, eating or engaging in other vital activities

Page 33: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Conceptual Lego… it could be... Post-coordinated

Structured Data Entry

File Edit Help

What you hit

Your Role

Activity

Location

Cycling Accident

Page 34: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)
Page 35: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Managing Expectations

March 2012• vTAG input finished• SEG finalizes the key

linearizations

May 2012• Representation of

Mortality and Morbidity Linearizations

• Reference Guide ( vol II)• Index (vol III)• Field Trial protocols• Multilingual Prototype

Page 36: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Current Status as of end Jan.2012

• Some Chapters need further work– Infectious Disease A– Neoplasms B,C– Sign & Symptoms R– Z codes

• Other chapters’ structure reported to be complete

• Definitions > 50% – Top level > 70 %

Page 37: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

37

ICD-11 Features

Internet Based Platform

Content Model

Translations

Field Trials for Use Cases

Definitions

Input from all Stakeholders

Electronic Health Record Ready

Page 38: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Bridge Coding

• The information on a case (live or medical record) will be coded:

• ICD10• ICD11

to see whether both systems yield the same codes.

Page 39: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

39

Measles

Rubella

Rubella

Measles

BETA PHASE FIELD TESTS:How TWO different users code the same case ?

?

Page 40: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Stability Analysisof ICD-11 key linearizations

• Categories remain constant vs changed • Mortality • ICD Morbidity - DRGs

10constant

changed 11

Page 41: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

41

• Shows the change from ICD-10– Backwards compatible

ICD11 alpha - DIFF

Page 42: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

“DIFF”Tracking incremental changes from ICD

Page 43: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

The curious case of …

Page 44: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

Transition Strategy

75 79 90 13 15 ??

ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-11

4 23

2015

ICD

- 2016

ICD

- 2017

ICD

- 2018

ICD

- 2019

Page 45: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

• Participation in the ICD Revision• Joint Authoring• Review Panels• Organizing Field testing

• Other BUSINESS Applications:

• Electronic Health Records • Education

Collaboration with IM TAGPost TOKYO:

Page 46: Tokyo 2012 ustun (show)

ICD Revision OverviewInternal Medicine TAG 2012

Dr. T. Bedirhan Üstün

Coordinator, Classifications, Terminologies, Standards.

World Health Organization