too much privacy is a health hazard

2
Too Much Privacy Is A Health Hazard I Print Article I Newsweek.com http://www OUtpUT/pI PRINT THIS Too Much Privacy Is A Health Hazard Efforts To Keep Medical Records Secret Can Deprive Doctors Of The Information They Need To Help You By Thomas Lee, M.D. I NE'!VSWEEK From the magazine issue dated Aug 16. 1999 Most patients like what they see on the computer monitor on my desk. There are lists of their medications and medical problems, laboratory results and reminders to do mammograms. They are impressed that all the doctors at our hospital work with the same infonnation about them. They are amused that I can check their test results from a laptop computer on an airplane. But more than a few people find cause to worry in this cutting-edge system. their diagnOSIs of diabetes leak to employers? Insurers? Companies making products for diabetics? A few years from now, will their genetic codes be flying around the Internet? are not paranoid fantasies. Threats to our medical privacy are proliferating as technology speeds the flow of infonnation--and people are fighting back. Patients are increasingly reluctant to release their health records, and states are passing laws to access to them. Unfortunately, these efforts can backfire. In Maine lawmakers tried earlier this year to bar the release of any infonnation without a patieru's written censent. The law seemed reasonable at first, but the result was chaos. Doctors caring for the same patient couldn't compare notes without first seeking pennission. Clinical labs had to stop giving patients their results over the phone. You couldn't even call a local hospital to find out if a loved one had been admitted. Confidentiality is a vital component of the trust between patients and physicians, and protecting it is worth some incOnvenience. But infonnation is the lifeblood of good health care. In short, privacy can be hazardous to your health. ( Consider what happens when a doctor writes you a prescription. If that doctor doesn't Know about every other drug you're using, the results can be disastrous. Patients have, died because one doctor prescribed Viagra for impotence and another ordered nitroglycerin for angina--a combination that dangerous drops in blood pressure. Fatal reactions have also occurred when patients on Prozac or Zoloft were given monoamine oxidase inhibitors (another type of antidepressant). Most deaths from drug interactions could be prevented by databases that show every prescription written for a particular patient. But insurers usually withhold that infonnation, for fear of offending subscribers. The result is that physicians have to rely on what patients remember, or choose to disclose. lof2 8/2112009 11: 12

Upload: jota-jota-de-ze

Post on 07-Nov-2015

7 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Great text

TRANSCRIPT

  • Too Much Privacy Is A Health Hazard IPrint Article INewsweek.com http://www .newsweel
  • Too Much Privacy Is A Health Hazard IPrint Article INewsweek.com http://www.newsweeK.COmlIOlMILMfourpuTlpr

    Drug interactions are not the only potential hazard. Suppose a person whose records are on file atone hospital shows up in the emergency room of another. Even if the records can be transferred, state law may bar the release of information about mental illness or HN status, forcing the ER physician to fly half blind. A laceration on a patient with a history of severe depression may warrant more than sutures-'-it may have been a suicide gesture. Likewise, pneumonia in a patient with HIV requires qifferent tests and treatments than it would in someone else.

    Even when privacy advocates concede that doctors need unfettered access to patients' records, most favor ,

    shielding them from HMO administrators. But a responsible health plan can put clinical information to good use. As part of a "disease management" program, an HMO may use computer software to determine

    \ whether patients with a chronic condition, such as asthma or hypertension, are filling their prescriptions and showing up for appointments. Those who fall behind may get a reminder bymail or phone. These programs can measurably improve people's health, but patients often miss out on them by refusing to authorize access to their records. Some plans hesitate even to launch such programs. One MassachUsetts HMO is now debating whether to send flu-shot reminders to members with HN. The program would

    I

    almost surely save lives, but it wouldjust as surely draw criticism as a breach of confidentiality.

    Privacy advocates are especially wary ofelectroni