topic 5
TRANSCRIPT
A strategic approach to people management that focuses on the issues
that are critical to an organization's success
◦ Greater transparency on how value is created
through effective people policies and practices will benefit organizations and their
stakeholders.
These personal assets are highly interrelated and have implications for both individuals and organizations:
Intellectual Capital
Emotional Capital
Social Capital
It form the basis for strong and supportive relationships and for developing the courage and grit necessary for entrepreneurship and taking action.
Is at the heart of individual development
The creation of knowledge and personal value.
Enables the exercise of choice.
Enables the continual growth
Enables fulfillment of ambition
Maintained through self awareness and insight.
Arises from the forging of relationships
Traditional hierarchical roles and responsibilities vs integrated structures and relationships of trust and reciprocity
Content Theories◦ Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs theory◦ Alderfer’s Modified Need Hierarchy Model◦ Herzberg’s Two Factor Theory (Motivation-Hygiene
Theory)◦ McClelland’s Achievement Motivation Theory
Process (Extrinsic) Theories◦ Expectancy Theories
Vroom’s Expectancy Theory
The Porter and Lawler Expectancy Model
◦ Equity Theory◦ Goal Theory◦ Attribution Theory
Maslow’s theory –Hierarchy of needs (triangle)
Lower needs must be satisfied before higher needs motivates
Once a need is substantially met, it no longer motivates
The motivation-hygiene theory put forward by Herzberg is a development of Maslow’s theory.
BKAM3033-TOPIC 5
The model condenses Maslow’s 5-levels of need into 3-levels based on the core needs of:◦ Existence – concerned with sustaining human existence
and survival and cover physiological and safety needs of a material nature.
◦ Relatedness – concerned with relationships to the social environment and cover love or belonging, affiliation and meaningful interpersonal relationships of a safety or esteem nature.
◦ Growth – concerned with the development of potential and cover self-esteem and self-actualization.
Thus, ERG Theory
Also known as Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory
Motivating factors creating job satisfaction: achievement, recognition, personal growth (advancement), responsibility, challenging work.
Hygiene factors creating job dissatisfaction: supervision, company policy, salary, relationship with peers or supervisors, working condition
KAM3033-TOPIC 6
This theory suggests that to improve job attitudes and productivity, administrators must recognize and attend to both sets of characteristics and not assume that an increase in satisfaction leads to a decrease in an un-pleasurable dissatisfaction.
Hygiene factors are needed to ensure an employee is not dissatisfied.
Motivation factors are needed in order to motivate an employee to higher performance.
If management wishes to increase satisfactionon the job, it should concerned with the nature of the work itself – the opportunities it presents for gaining status, assuming responsibility and for achieving self-realization.
But, if management wishes to reduce dissatisfaction, then it must focus on the job environment (policies, procedures, supervision & working conditions).
If management is equally concerned with both, then managers must give attention to both sets of job factors.
McClelland’s work originated from investigations into the relationship between hunger needs and the extent to which imagery of food dominated thought processes
He identified 4 main arousal-based, and socially developed needs or motives:
1. The achievement motive correspond to
2. The power motive Maslow’s S-A, 3. The affiliative motive esteem & love needs
4. The avoidance motive
KAM3033-TOPIC 6
A need to achieve- A person with this type of need, will set goals that
are challenging but realistic.
A need for power- The need to lead others and make an impact.- Socialized power: directed more towards the
organization and concern for group goals. Is exercised on behalf of other people
- Personalized power: characterized by satisfaction from exercising dominance over the people, and personal enhancement.
A need for affiliation- The need for friendly relationships and human
interaction.
KAM3033-TOPIC 6
The relative intensity of these motives varies:
◦ Between individuals◦ Between different occupations
Managers appear to be higher in achievement motivation than in affiliation motivation
n-Ach is seen as the most critical for a country’s economic growth and success
◦ Linked to entrepreneurial spirit and the development of available resources
KAM3033-TOPIC 6
Underlying basis of expectancy theory:
People are influenced by the expected results of their actions.
Motivation is a function of the relationship between:
◦ Effort expended and perceived level of performance◦ The expectation that rewards (desired outcomes) will be
related to performance.
There must also be:◦ The expectation that rewards (desired outcomes) are
available
These relationships determine the strength of the ‘motivational link’
KAM3033-TOPIC 6
Performance depends upon the perceived expectation regarding effort expended and achieving the desired outcome.
◦ The desire for promotion will result in high performance only if the person believes there is a strong expectation that this will lead to promotion.
◦ If otherwise the person believes promotion to be based solely on age and length of service, there is no motivation to achieve high performance.
A person’s behavior reflects a conscious choice between the comparative evaluation of alternative behaviors.
The choice of behavior is based on the expectancy of the most favorable consequences.
KAM3033-TOPIC 6
Was the first person to propose an expectancy theory aimed specifically at work motivation.
Also known as VIE theory or valence theory.
Under ET, an individual chooses behavior;◦ On the basis of probabilities perceived◦ On the benefits, personal utilities or satisfaction that can
be derived from the outcomes
Individuals should be rewarded with what he/she perceives as important rather than what the manager perceives
KAM3033-TOPIC 6
Vroom argued that in order for a person to be motivated, the effort, performance and motivation must be linked.
Three important variables:◦ Valence – anticipated value◦ Instrumentality◦ Expectancy.
The theory is founded on the idea that people prefer certain outcomes from their behavior over others.◦ They anticipate feelings of satisfaction should the preferred
outcome be achieved.
Valence is the feeling about or the importance that the individual places upon the expected outcomes.◦ (the attractiveness of, the preference for, a particular outcome
to the individual) E.g. If I am mainly motivated by money, I might not
value offers of additional time off.
A person may desire an object but then gain little satisfaction from obtaining it.
Alternatively, a person may strive to avoid an object, but find, subsequently, that it provides satisfaction.
Thus, valence is the anticipated satisfaction from an outcome.
Whereas value is the actual satisfaction provided by an outcome.
Instrumentality is the belief that if you perform well, a valued outcome will be received: i.e. if I do a good job, there is something in it for me.
The valence of outcomes derives from their instrumentality.
This leads to a distinction between:◦ First level outcomes◦ Second-level outcomes
First level outcomes
◦ Are performance-related
◦ Refer to the quantity of output or to the comparative level of performance
◦ Some people may seek to perform well ‘for its own sake’ and without thought to expected consequences of their actions.
◦ Usually however, performance outcomes acquire valence because of the expectation that they will lead to other outcomes as an anticipated source of satisfaction i.e. second-level outcomes.
Second level outcomes
◦ Are need-related
◦ Derived through achievement of first-level outcomes i.e. through achieving high-performance.
◦ Many need-related outcomes are dependent upon actual performance rather than effort expended.
◦ People generally received rewards for what they have achieved rather than for effort alone or through trying hard.
Expectancy is the belief that increased effort will lead to increased performance: i.e. if I work harder then this will be better achieved.
When a person chooses between alternative behaviors which have uncertain outcomes, the choice is affected by:◦ The preference for a particular outcome;◦ The probability that such an outcome will be achieved.
People develop a perception of the degree of probability that the choice of a particular action will actually lead to the desired outcome this is expectancy.
It is the relationship between a chosen course of action and its predicted outcome.
Its value ranges between 0, indicating zero probability that an action will be followed by the outcome, and 1, indicating certainty that an action will result in the outcome.
The combination of valence and expectancy determines a person’s motivation for a given form of behavior. This is termed as motivational force.
Developed from Vroom’s expectancy theory
The model goes beyond motivational force and considers performance as a whole.
Pointed out that effort expended (motivational force):◦ does not lead directly to performance;
◦ is mediated by :
individual abilities and traits;
The person’s role perceptions.
Introduce rewards as an intervening variable
See motivation, satisfaction and performance as separate variables and attempt to explain the complex relationships among them.
Recognizes that job satisfaction is more dependent upon performance, than performance is upon satisfaction.
◦ i.e. performance determines job satisfaction
◦ And not job satisfaction that determines performance (human relations approach)
The attractiveness of alternative behaviors is dependent on 2 types of expectancies :
◦ Effort-performance expectancies (E P) A person’s perception of the probability that a given amount
of effort will result in achieving an intended level of performance
Measured on a scale between 0 and 1 The closer the relationship between effort and performance,
the higher the E P expectancy score.
◦ Performance-outcome expectancies (P O) A person’s perception of the probability that a given level of
performance will actually lead to particular need-related outcomes.
Measured on a scale between 0 and 1. The closer the perceived relationship between performance
and outcome, the higher the P O expectancy score.
Managers should:
Use rewards appropriate in terms of individual performance. Outcomes with high valence should be used as an incentive for improved performance.
Attempt to establish clear relationships between effort-performance and rewards, as perceived by the individual.
Establish clear procedures for the evaluation of individual levels of performance.
Managers should:
Pay attention to intervening variables such as abilities and traits, roles perceptions, organizational procedures and support facilities, which, may affect performance, even though indirectly.
Minimize undesirable outcomes which may be perceived to result from a high level of performance such as industrial accidents or sanctions from co-workers, or to result despite a high level of performance such as short-time working or layoffs.
Focuses on people’s feelings of how fairly they have been treated in comparison with the treatment received by others.
It is based on exchange theory, as social relationships involve an exchange process.
Most exchanges involve a number of inputs and outcomes.
People is said to place a weighting on these various inputs and outcomes according to how they perceive their importance.
When there is an unequal comparison of ratios, the person experiences a sense of inequity.