topic 5 perspectives in policy studies: discursive- critical perspective edm 6209 policy studies in...

Topic 5Perspectives in Policy Studies:

Discursive- Critical Perspective

EDM 6209

Policy Studies in Education

Public policy as argumentative and persuasive practice Redefining the nature of public policy: “As

politicians know too well but social scientists too often forget, public policy is made of language. Whether in written or oral form, argument is central in all stages of the policy process.” (Majone, 1989, p.1)

Argumentative and Persuasive Turns in Policy Studies

Public policy as linguistic and argumentative practice (cont’d)

Redefining the role of the policy analysts: “In a system of government by discussion, analysis - even professional analysis - has less to do with formal techniques of problem solving than with process of argument. The job of analysts consists in large part of producing evidence and arguments to be used in the course of public debate. Its crucial argumentative aspect is what distinguishes policy analysis from the academic social science on the one hand, and from problem-solving methodologies such as operations research on the other. …

Argumentative and Linguistic Turns in Policy Studies

Public policy as linguistic and argumentative practice (cont’d)

… They must persuade if they are to be taken seriously in the forums of public deliberation. Thus, analysts, like lawyers, politicians, and others who make a fundamental use of language, will always be involved in all the technical problems of language, including rhetorical problems. (Majone, 1989, p. 7)


Public policy as practice of persuasion Redefining the nature of public policy: “All our talk of

‘making’ public policy, of ‘choosing’ and ‘deciding’, loses track of the home truth … that politics and policy making is mostly a matter of persuasion. Decide, choose, legislate as they will, policy makers must carry people with them, if their determinations are to have the full force of policy. …To make policy in a way that makes it stick, policy makers cannot merely issue edicts. They need to persuade the people who must follow their edicts if those are to become general public practice.” (Goodin et al., 2006, p. 5)


Public policy as practice of persuasion Redefining the core of the discipline: “Not only is

the practice of public policy making largely a matter of persuasion. So is the discipline of studying public policy making aptly described as itself being a ‘persuasion’. It is a mood more than a science, a loosely organized body of percepts and positions rather than a tightly integrated body of systemic knowledge, more art and craft and genuine ‘science’.” (ibid)


Locating the levels of study for policy discourse The concept of discourse has become popular in social

sciences in past decades. As the concept being used by various disciplines in social sciences, the meanings of the concept have become heterogeneous if not chaotic.

At conversation level, the concept of discourse can refers to speech act, language use, or parole. For example in classroom discourse study, discourse is taken as speech act and speech exchange between teachers and students in the classroom context.

Discursive Perspective in Policy Studies

Locating the levels of study for policy discourse At institution level, discourse can refers to cognitive,

regulative and normative rules governing the circulation and practice of ideas, concepts, categories and representations of social meanings within a social institutional domain. For examples, in medical institution, discourse may take the form of a certification issued by a doctor to a patient indicating the health condition of the latter and the whole institutional configuration making this certification effective; and in educational institution, discourse may take the form of a certificate issued by government to a student certifying passing of an examination of the latter and the whole institutional configuration making this certification effective.


Locating the levels of study for policy discourse At socio-cultural system level, discourse can refers to

the dominance or hegemony governing the circulation and/or practice of ideas, concepts, categories and representations of social meanings in a society. For example, the discourses of neo-liberal capitalism or socialism in economy system; discourse of liberal democracy or proletarian dictatorship in political system; etc.


The conception of discourse in public policy Frank Fischer defines “Discourse …is an ensemble of

ideas and concepts that give social meaning to social and physical relations.” (2003, p. 90)

David Howarth defines Discourse refers “to historically specific systems of meaning which form the identities of subjects and objects.” (2002, quoted in Fischer, 2003, p. 73)

Maarten Hajer defines discourse as “a specific ensemble of ideas, concepts, and categories that are produced, reproduced, and transformed to give meaning to physical and social relations.” (1995, quoted in Fischer, 2003, p. 73)


The conception of discourse in public policy Taken together these conceptions of discourse, policy

discourse can then be characterized as a historically specific ensemble of ideas, concepts and categories which gives meaning to physical and social relations and forms identities of subjects and objects within a particular policy domain and/or around a specific policy issue. For example, the neo-liberalism in public policy; the “Washington consensus” in fiscal policy; the welfare state or the workfare state in welfare policy; comprehensive- egalitarianism or quasi-market discourse in education policy.


Michel Foucault’s Theory of Discourse

1926-1984

Conception of Statement The statement – the constituent unit of a discourse

“The statement is not the same kind of unit as the sentence, the proposition, or the speech act…The statements is not …a structure (i.e. a group of relations between variable elements...); it is a function of existence that properly belong to signs and on the basis of which one may then decide, through analysis or intuition, whether or not they ‘make sense’, according to what rule they follow one another or are juxtaposed, of what they are the sign, and what sort of act is carried out by their formulation (oral or written).” (Foucault, 1972, p. 86-87)


Conception of Statement Accordingly policy statement can then be defined as a

specification or even a prescription (in oral or written format) circulating in a particular public policy domain. It defines the “conditions of existence” the objects in the specific public policy domain are qualified to obtain. For examples:


For examples: Liberal studies is one of the four core subjects in New Senior

Secondary Curriculum Profit-making kindergartens are not eligible to participate in

educational-voucher scheme Form-3 students in school X are below the standard of

Territory-wide System Assessment in English-language Student X is a EMI-capable student in SSPA, school Y is a

EMI school, teacher Z is a EMI-capable teacher Student A is a Special-Educational-Needs (SEN) student Primary school M has adopted small-class-size teaching School N is a “Quality” school in ESR scheme School Q is not managed by Incorporated Management

Committee (IMC)


Conception of discourse A discourse “is the totality of all effective statements

(whether spoken or written). ... Description of discourse is in opposition to the history of thought. There…a system of thought can be reconstituted only on the basis of a definite discursive totality. …The analysis of thought is always allegorical in relation to the discourse that it employs. Its question is unfailingly: what is being said in what was said? …what is this specific existence that emerges from what is said and nowhere else?” (Foucault, 1972, p. 27-28)


Conception of discourse “We can now give a full meaning to the definition of

‘discourse’. …We shall call discourse a group of statements in so far as they belong to the same discursive formation. …It is made up of a limited number of statements for which a group of conditions of existence can be defined.” (p. 117)


Conception of discourse Hence, a policy discourse is a totality and unity of

effective policy statements within a public policy domain in specific historical, cultural, and socio-economic contexts. For example, the quasi-market discourse on education reforms implemented by capitalist states in developed countries in the last decade of the 20th century can be construed as a totality of effective policy statements which stipulate the underlying principles as well as the operational mechanism of the schooling system in these countries.


Marketization

SupplyDemand

Medium of Exchange

Market signals

PrincipalProfessional Development

TeacherCompetenceFramework

LanguageProficiencyAsessment

EMI-CapableTeachers

EMI-CapableStudentsSVAIS

TTRA,TOC,

SVAIS

Standardization, Normalization, Commodification & Reification

ParentalChoice

EMI Schools

DSS

SSPADiscretionaryPlaces

Fra

gm

enta

tio

n &

S

trat

ific

atio

n

AuditedSchools

SBM

QAI

SSE

ERS

S-B Ordinance

Stan

dard

ization

&

Dism

antliztio

n

Surveillance-evaluationism

Discipline-managerialism

Pre-school Voucher System

Parentocracy-consumerism

Foucault’s Theory of Discursive Formation

Foucault differentiates the formation of a discourse into four interrelated parts. The Formation of Object:

Mapping the surface of the emergence of the objectDescribing the authorities of delimitationAnalyzing the grids of specification


Foucault’s Theory of Discursive Formation The Formation of Enunciative Modality

Identifying who is speaking, who is accorded the right to use this sort of language, who is qualified to do so.

Describing the institutional sites from which the discourse is made and form which the discourse derives its legitimate source and point of application

Analyzing the position of the subject, in which s/he occupies in relation to the various domains and groups of objects


Foucault’s Theory of Discursive Formation The Formation of Concepts: the formation of the

organization of the field of statements where they appeared and circulated Identifying the forms of succession, e.g.

• Orderings of enunciative series

• Types of dependence of the statement

• Rhetorical schemata according to which groups of statements may be combined


Foucault’s Theory of Discursive Formation The Formation of Concepts: the formation of the

organization of the field of statements where they appeared and circulated Identifying the forms of coexistence

• Field of presence

• Field of concomitance

• Field of memory

Identifying the procedures of intervention that may be legitimately applied to statements, e.g. technique of rewriting , method of transcribing, mode of translating, means of transferring, method of systematizing


Foucault’s Theory of Discursive Formation The Formation of Strategies or theoretical and

thematic choice Determining the points of diffraction of discourse

• Point of incompatibility

• Point of equivalence

• Point of systematization

Analyzing the economy of the discursive constellation Analyzing the other authority, e.g. functional to fields of

non-discursive practice, observing the rules and processes of appropriation of discourse


Foucault’s Theory of Power/Knowledge and Discourse The relation between discourse and power:

“Discourse can be both an instrument and an effect of power… Discourse transmits and produces power; it reinforces it.” (Foucault, 1978, 101, my italic)

The concept of power/knowledge “It is in discourse that power and knowledge are joined

together” (Foucault, 1978, p. 100) and constitute what Foucault conceptualized the power/knowledge.


The concept of power/knowledge “We should admit … that power and knowledge directly imply

one another; that there is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations. These power/knowledge relations are to be analyzed, therefore, not on the basis of a subject of knowledge who is or is not free in relation to the power system, but, on the contrary, the subject who knows, the objects to be known and the modalities of knowledge must be regarded as so many effects of these fundamental implications of power/knowledge and their historical transformations. In short, it is not the activities of the subject of knowledge that produces a corpus of knowledge, useful or resistant to power, but power/knowledge, the processes and struggles that traverse it and of which it is made up, that determines the forms and possible domains of knowledge.” (Foucault, 1977, p. 28)


Critical Discourse Analysis

Assumptions of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA): As a research approach, CDA has assigned numbers of particular features to the understanding of discourse Discourse as social practice: Discourse is no

longer construed as individual language use in forms of text or talk, but as social practices which implies Representation and/or expression of meaning and value Acts upon the world Acts upon social relations between human beings


Assumptions of CDA Constitutive nature of discourse: Construed as

social practice, discourse therefore takes on a constitutive nature. In other words, human beings use discourse to construct the worlds or realities around them. This constitutive nature of discourse may manifest in at least three aspects Ideational construction: “Discourse contributes to the

construction of system of knowledge and belief.” (Fairclough, 1992, p. 64) For example, discourse of science contributes to the construction of the material world around us so are discourse of myths or religion.


Assumptions of CDA Constitutive nature of discourse:

Relational construction: “Discourse help construct social relationship between people.” (ibid) For example, liberal- democratic discourse derived from the Enlightenment contributes to the constitution of the political realities of modern societies.

Identity construction: Discourse contributes to the construction of social subjects, self and social identity. For example, the identity of citizenship is constructed through the liberal-democratic discourse in the past three centuries in human societies.


Assumptions of CDA Dialectic relationship between discourse and the social

structure

“It is important that the relationship between discourse and social structure should be seen dialectically if we are to avoid the pitfalls of overemphasizing on the one hand the social determination of discourse, and on the other hand the construction of the social in discourse.” (Fairclough, 1992, p. 65) In other words, the dialectic perspective in the relation between discourse and social structure takes both social determination and social construction into to consideration and assumes them to be in a interactive and mediating relation.


Assumptions of CDA Discourse is historical: CDA takes discourse as

concrete social practice in particular historical and socio-cultural contexts. Hence, analysis of contexts, where the discourse takes place, is an essential part of CDA.


Assumptions of CDA Ideological effect of discourse: The core question

CDA attempts to explore is how discourse serves as means to legitimatize and reproduce prevailing relations of power in a society, i.e. constituting ideological effects for forms of social dominations. Hence, to wage critique on domination and the social distortion and bias that it elicits is what makes CDA “critical”.


Fairclough’s three-dimensional framework of CDA Three-dimensional analytical framework of CDA

Text analysis: This dimension of discourse analysis includes • Analyses of text

• Analysis of textuality

• Analysis of intertextuality

Discourse analysis: It covers analysis of the process of production, distribution and consumption of a discourse. In other words, it basically correspond Foucault’s conception of discursive formation.


Three-dimensional framework of CDA (cont’d)

Three-dimensional analytical framework of CDA Ideology analysis: This aspect of discourse analysis aims to

reveal the ideological effect embedded and/or constituted in a particular discursive practice. By ideological effect of a discourse, it refers to effect of a discourse in legitimating and reproducing prevailing inequalities in power relations and social distortions and biases in social-cultural practice.

Furthermore, as an ideological effect of a discourse has achieved the cognitive status of “taken for granted” or “common sense” among participants of a discourse, then it has constituted, what Gramsci conceptualizes, hegemony. Hegemony is “an ideological complex” (Gramsci, 1971; quoted in Fairclough, 1992, p. 92), which constitutes “leadership as well as domination across the economic, political, cultural and ideological domains of a society.” (Fairclough, 1992, p. 92)


Figure 1: Analytical Framework of Critical Discourse Analysis

38

Text as Fixation of discourse

Hermeneutics as Distanciation Bridging

Discourse Meanings

Discourse Author’s Intentions

Author’s Context

Readers’ Context

Text World of Text

Being-There of the text

Being-There of the text

Textuality as Textual of the text

Absence

Frame

Genre

Rhetoric

Metaphor

Audience ― Rhetor

Iconicity

Intertextuality

DISCOURSE

Totality of all effective statements

Formation of Objects

Formation of Enunciative

Modelity

Formation of Concepts

Formation of Strategies &

Thematic Choice

Fairclough’s three-dimensional framework of CDA The mediating function of discursive practices between

textual practices and social-cultural practices.

“Critical discourse analysis is very much about making connections between social and cultural structures and processes on the one hand, and properties of text on the other.” (Faieclough and Wodak, 1997, p. 277) Critical discourse analysts has construed the dimension of discursive practice as the mediator between the two. They has characterized the connection to be mediating in nature. In other words, the connection is neither direct nor deterministic but in the form of dialectic and interactive.


Conception of social critique and critical social science According to Jurgen Habermas, a prominent figure in Critical

Theory in Germany, the primary concern of critical social scientists and social critiques in general is to refute the assumption of empirical-positivistic social researcher that social regularities revealed in social researches are given facts comparable to those natural facts discovered in natural science. Accordingly, they must reflect on the legitimation foundation, which the prevailing social regularities are built upon. More specially, they have to go beyond the status quo and try hard to reveal the possible "power-hypostatized" social relations and "ideologically-frozen" social discourses at work. (1971, P. 310)

Policy Studies as Social Critiques

Conception of critique and critical social science Applying these ideas to policy studies, critical policy studies

can then be construed as attempts to unmask the possible distorted social relations hypostatized in specific public policies,

which are bias in favor of the dominants and/or against the dominated, and

distorted social discourses frozen in particular policy arenas, that ideologues of the advantageous have forged in order to mystify and/or rationalize the prevailing biases.

As a result, the objective of critical social science, including critical policy studies, is to emancipate the disadvantageous and dominated from distorted and biased

social relations instituted in prevailing social arrangements; the articulations and voices of the disadvantageous and

dominated, which have been silenced in the ideologies forged by the ideologues of the dominants.

Policy Studies as Critiques

Aspects of criticality in policy studies Critique on policy issues and frames: Critical policy researchers

can set out to reflect on the way a policy issue is formulated and framed by the dominant policy discourse of the state. And see if there are any relational and ideological distortions embedded in a particular formulation of policy issue.

Critique on policy stances of specific parties: Critical policy researchers can reflect on the possible relational distortion embedded in the discursive process of a particular policy arena. That is, they can assess the chances and capacities that different interest parties possess in articulating their concerns and in redressing their grievances. Furthermore, critical policy studies can also reflect on the ideological distortions found in the arguments formulated and proclaimed by different parties concerned.


Aspects of criticality in policy studies Critique on policy context: The third aspect of criticality in

policy studies is to reflect on the macro socio-historical context and/or meso institutional context, form which a particular policy issue is originated. More specifically, it can assess whether there is any relational and ideological distortions embedded in these context, which give rise to the policy issue at point.

Critique on policy practice: The final aspect of criticality in policy studies is to reflect on the possibilities of transformation and emancipation that a policy practice can bring about in rectifying the relational and ideological distortions embedded in a policy phenomenon.


In search of discursive object of HKSAR education reform In terms of policy document

Discursive Analysis of Lifelong Learning Education Reform in HKSAR

“I am convinced that we need to take a very careful look at the whole structure of our education system. We need to decide how it

should develop into the next century.”

Policy Address of the Chief Executive of the HKSAR Mr. Tung Chee-wah, October 8, 1997

In search of discursive object of HKSAR education reform In terms of policy document In terms of temporal demarcation In terms of discursive theme: Lifelong

learning?


“As we head into the 21st century, rapid developments in communication and IT are bringing the world ever closer together. Hong Kong faces strong competition from neighbouring economies in many areas, including trade, finance, transportation, communication and tourism. …In the knowledge-based economy, existing knowledge is being updated at an everfaster pace. Our young people must be outward-looking, imbued with a spirit of exploration, able to make the best use of IT, able to master different kinds of knowledge, and willing to strive to improve through continuous learning. To enhance our competitiveness, Hong Kong has to shift to high value-added and technology-based production and services. We need people who are creative, versatile, knowledgeable and multi-talented. … In this competitive world, we are concerned about whether our education system can enable students constantly to strive for the pursuit of knowledge, whilst enjoying the fun of learning in the process, and about whether our students have the room to develop their potential, whilst bracing themselves for the challenges and competition ahead.” (Education Commission, 1999a, Pp.9-10)

The No 1 reform agenda is to construct “The lifelong learning academic structure” (Education Commission, 1999b, p. 19)

“The purpose of this report is to set out the general directions for curriculum development in Hong Kong for the next 10 years, to fulfill the version of enabling students to attain all-round development and life-long learning. (Curriculum Development Council, 2001, p. i)

Analysis of the Enunciative Modality in HKSAR education reform Speakers and the their positions and/authority to

speak Languages used in discourse The institutional sites within which the discourse

takes place


Understanding the discursive concept of HKSAR education reform Understanding the formation of discursive concept

in academic discourse: Two versions of lifelong long education reforms Lifelong learning education reform for economic

rationalism Lifelong learning education reform for social inclusion and

political empowerment


Analysis of the discursive strategies of HKSAR education reform Points of equivalence and systematization: The

construction of the quasi-market mechanism


Points of equivalence & systematization Constitution of medium of exchange: The

discursive practice of surveillance-evaluationism Constitution of effective supply: The discursive

practice of discipline-managerialism Constitution of effective demand: The discursive

practice of parentocracy-consumerism

The Discursive Strategies of Quasi-Market Mechanism in HKSAR

Constitution of surveillance-evaluationism TRA, TTRA, TOC and BCA MIGA, Angoff standard setting, pre-S1 HKAT, EMI-

capable SVAIS


Constitution of discipline-managerialism ECR#7: Qualilty School Education Performance Indicators Key Performance Measures QAI SSE and ESR Teacher Benchmarking Assessment and Teacher

Competencies Framework From SMI to Education (Amendment) Ordinance

2004


Constitution of parentocracy-consumerism MOI Guidance for Secondary Schools School Profiles Reform of SSPA and POA

Increase of Discretionary Places (DP) from 10% to 30% Increase parental choice (in the form of application for DP)

from one school to two

Post-19997 reforms on DSS


Marketization

SupplyDemand

Medium of Exchange

Market signals

PrincipalProfessional Development

TeacherCompetenceFramework

LanguageProficiencyAsessment

EMI-CapableTeachers

EMI-CapableStudentsSVAIS

TTRA,TOC,

SVAIS

Standardization, Normalization, Commodification & Reification

ParentalChoice

EMI Schools

DSS

SSPADiscretionaryPlaces

Fra

gm

enta

tio

n &

S

trat

ific

atio

n

AuditedSchools

SBM

QAI

SSE

ERS

S-B Ordinance

Stan

dard

ization

&

Dism

antliztio

n

Surveillance-evaluationism

Discipline-managerialism

Pre-school Voucher System

Parentocracy-consumerism

Analysis of the discursive strategies of HKSAR education reform Points of equivalence and systematization: The

construction of the quasi-market mechanism Points of incompatibility Economy of discursive constellation of public

policy of HKSAR Government


Analysis of the ideological and hegemonic practice of the discourse of HKSAR education reform Discursive domination / hegemony of market

system and bureaucratic- administrative system over education system

Distortions and bias against communicative-communal discourse in education

Distortion and bias against critical-emancipatory discourse in education

Suppression and bias against the discourse of the education profession


END

5Policy Substance Study:

Interpretive-Political Perspective

topic 5 perspectives in policy studies: discursive- critical perspective edm 6209 policy studies in...

Documents

policy studies public

policy making

practice of public policy

policy analysis

policy analysts

policy process

policy makers

educationpublic policy