topic 7: geophysical and remote sensing models · ... map extent of pressure change • locate heat...
TRANSCRIPT
Topic 7: Geophysical and Remote Sensing Models
Presenter: Greg UssherOrganisation:SKMEmail: [email protected]
Overview• Surface-based imaging of subsurface characteristics
– That indicate geothermal system location– That control system behaviour
• Multiple methods applied– Each provide different information– Relative value depends on geological environment and
hydrothermal system type
• Integration in Concept Models – Multi-method and multi-disciplinary integration– Develop and refine concept models – The basis for any 3D geological or numerical reservoir model
• Consider environments between systems
Objective• Locate subsurface extent of geothermal systems
– Mapping effects caused by the presence of thermal fluids and associated hydrothermal alteration
• Resistivity – fluids and alteration• Magnetics – alteration (demagnetization)• Gravity – densification from deposition
• Locate structures that control geothermal fluid movement– Faults, calderas, basement structures
• Gravity – offsets and infill structures• Resistivity –surface effects on fault traces and deep low permeable zones• MEQ – fault planes and active structure• Subsidence – map extent of pressure change
• Locate heat source• Resistivity – magma chamber• Gravity – major intrusives• Seismics – melt has significantly different structure• Magnetics – deep regional temperature
The toolboxMethod Detection of : Sensitivity / factor
Resistivity (MT) Hydrothermal alteration – clay capHydrothermal alteration – high TDirect temperatureSalinity
100 to 1000-10 to -10010 to 100Depends on porosity
Gravity StructuresMineralisation
HighLow
Magnetics Hydrothermal alterationGeology variationCurie point (thermal demagnetisation)
Surface – highSurface – high/low? V Low
Seismics / MEQ Fracture location (Acoustic noise) Fracture / structure orientationsVelocity model – structureTemperature ?
Low - ModerateModerateLow - Moderate?
Subsidence Reservoir pressure change - extent Moderate - High
Gravity change Fluid saturation changes Moderate - High
RESISTIVITY
DC methods –reliable mapping tool
DC Resistivity - Limitations• Limited depth penetration
– Very long arrays required to get good depth• AB/2=1000m probably gives depth of about 300m.
– Requires increasingly large power sources for greater depth
– Not so reliable in mountainous terrain• Survey logistics are complex in difficult terrain
– Limits survey extent
Magneto – telluric (MT) resistivity• Now the main resistivity exploration tool• Gives good depth penetration and reasonable
horizontal resolution• Complex data collection and processing
– Necessary that this is done well to get useful results– Equipment relatively expensive– Typically use specialist survey contractors
• Not “do-it-yourself”• Unless surveying very large areas for several years
2D Inversion Modelling
3D Model Inversion• Integrated modeling of
all data• 3D Visualisation and
vertical & horizontal slicing
• Model Topographic effects
• Model shallow features that cause static shifts– Avoiding need for
TDEM corrections now
Resistivity at 50 mModel cross -section
What we look for in the MT results
11
A clear conductive layer (Low resistivity,
clay cap)
Top of conductor is probably 50-70 °C
Bottom of conductor is probably 180-200°C
Extent of probable reservoir lies under
“strongest” section of the conductive layer
Probable Reservoir
Shallow and Deep conductorsNW SESource: S. M. Sewell, W. B. Cumming, L. Azwar & C. Bardsley , 2012
Rotokawa 3D InterpretationN S
Source: S. M. Sewell, W. B. Cumming, L. Azwar & C. Bardsley , 2012
Orakeikorako - NgatamarikiSource: O’Brien, J.M., 2010 PhD thesis - Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of the Ngatamariki Geothermal Field and a Comparison with the Orakei Korako Thermal Area, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand.
Source: GNS NgatamarikiGeoscience Report, 2008 (AEE Appendices)
Regional MT survey of Sth TVZ
Source: Bertrand et al., 2012 (GNS)
Regional MT survey of Sth TVZ
Source: Bertrand et al., 2012 (GNS)
Resistivity - Conclusions• Shallow conductive alteration cap is a key
indicator of presence of geothermal system– Often indicating shallow reservoirs and outflows– Useful system located where vertical permeability
allows upflow to these shallower levels– Temperature effect means that a “strong conductor” is
not relict• Deeper conductors found in TVZ indicate mod-
high temperature but low permeability– These are probably conductive heat flow areas
• No conductor (deep nor shallow) – no temperature ???
GRAVITY & MAGNETICS
Gravity – caldera mapping
Supri Soengkono 2012. Gravity Modelling Of Reporoa Basin, Eastern Taupo Volcanic Zone (Tvz), New Zealand. NZGW
Gravity mapping a pull-apart basin
Gravity models can identify basement structure that can be critical for understanding deeper controls on permeability
Gravity 2D Model
21
Densification due to Geothermal Activity
This is a subtle effect and only identifiable when geology is consistent and terrain flat
Airborne Gravity - Gradiometry
• Enables accurate measurement from a moving vehicle / aircraft
• Can cover large areas
Aeromagnetic anomaly – maps near surface alteration
Low magnetic anomaly (Reduced to pole) where hydrothermal alteration is exposed near surface.
Areas of fresh rock cover have magnetic high even though underlain by hydrothermal alteration
Gravity & Magnetics - Conclusions• Gravity
– Has value in determining major structures– Basement and sediment layers can be a critical
control on permeability at depth in systems– Good density of data is required to resolve structures– An undervalued and neglected tool
• Magnetics– Shallow effects strongest– Probably lower value for deeper investigation
SEISMICS / MEQ
MEQ – Locating stucture
Basemap : GeothermEx 2005 Catherine Lewis Kenedi, Eylon Shalev, Alan Lucas, and Peter Malin, WGC 2010
MEQ hypocentres can mark faults (often confirming surface mapping).
In this case highlighted an offset in the active structure
MEQ – Velocity models
Basemap : GeothermEx 2005 Catherine Lewis Kenedi, Eylon Shalev, Alan Lucas, and Peter Malin, WGC 2010
Velocity models can indicate variations of geology at depth.
Reportedly temperature effect (Vp reduction at high T)
MEQ – Darajat, IndonesiaBase level activity Activity during injection
MEQ induced by injection - Darajat
MEQ induced by injection can be effective in identifying active permeable zones.
This can work even where natural activity is very low
SUBSIDENCE AND GRAVITY CHANGE
Reservoir change
Leyte Geothermal Field, Philippines
Nilo A. Apuada, Rhoel Enrico R. Olivar and Noel D. Salonga (PNOC - 2005)
Leyte – Reservoir changesPressure change1996-2002
Elevation change1997-2003
Leyte – Gravity change
Gravity change due to expansion of 2-phase zone
Gravity 1997-2003
Wairakei - Tauhara
Subsidence from levelling Subsidence from InSAR
InSAR: Svartsengi-Reykjanes, Iceland1992-2000
Thóra Árnadóttir, Sigrún Hreinsdóttir, Marie Keiding, SigurjónJónsson, Judicael Decriem, Karolina Michalczewska, Martin Hensch, Halldór Geirsson, Andy Hooper, Benedikt G. Ófeigsson. GPS and InSAR observations on Reykjanes
Svartsengi
Reykjanes
Long term production at Svartsengi. Gradual pressure decline.
InSAR: Svartsengi-Reykjanes, Iceland2003-2009
Thóra Árnadóttir, Sigrún Hreinsdóttir, Marie Keiding, SigurjónJónsson, Judicael Decriem, Karolina Michalczewska, Martin Hensch, Halldór Geirsson, Andy Hooper, Benedikt G. Ófeigsson. GPS and InSAR observations on Reykjanes
Svartsengi
Reykjanes
100 MW production at Reykjanes since 2006. Small production area, rapid pressure decline but wider subsidence effect
Conclusions• Geophysics exploration methods are:
– Describing the presence and extent of hydrothermal systems
– Defining areas of high conductive heatflow (and low!)– Defining major geological features including
• Upflow controlling structures• Basement and lateral permeability controls
• Geophysics monitoring is indicating :– Extent of pressure change (lateral recharge areas)– Areas of mass change– Fluid flow paths at depth
• Consider a suite of exploration methods, regardless of any pre-conceived model for a target area
Implications for modelling systems• Geophysics interpretations are part of a sound multi-
disciplinary approach to system modelling• Geophysical methods provide key constraints on
concept models– Indicating depths and extent of key characteristics that can
only otherwise be speculated upon beyond wells– Provide indications of deeper parameters (beyond drilling
depth) that may affect long term behaviour– Indicating conditions between adjacent hydrothermal
systems• Considering wider constraints on hydrothermal
systems may have value in modelling more localised reservoir performance