toward a science of honors education

18
Toward a Science of Honors Education Honors in the Age of Accountability Beata Jones, [email protected] Honors Faculty Fellow, Texas Christian University October 14, 2016, Seattle, WA, U.S.A. National Collegiate Honors Council Conference Based on JNCHC article by Beata Jones with the same title: 17(1), 307-333.

Upload: beata-jones

Post on 22-Jan-2018

137 views

Category:

Education


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Toward a Science of Honors Education

Honors in the Age of Accountability

Beata Jones,

[email protected]

Honors Faculty Fellow, Texas Christian University

October 14, 2016, Seattle, WA, U.S.A.

National Collegiate Honors Council Conference

Based on JNCHC article by Beata Jones with the same title: 17(1), 307-333.

Why Research Honors?

Long-standing, recognized need for research in Honors

NCHC executive board recognizes research as a key priority

U.S. vs. European honors research

Why this Research?

A manifesto to all honors practitioners in the U.S. and around the world to

join forces and develop an honors research agenda

Yield more holistic understanding of our

dynamic field.

Transform our practice based on a rich, evidence-

based set of guidelines.

Showcase how we make a difference, potentially increasing institutional

support.

Archive and promote the agenda as well as the associated research

findings.

Research Framework – Analysis Levels

External Environment

Honors Programs/Colleges

Honors Courses

Honors Stakeholders

Research Framework - Stakeholders

Primary Stakeholders Secondary Stakeholders

• Honors Students

• Honors Faculty

• Honors Staff

• Honors Administrators

• Honors Alumni

• Honors Board Members

• Friends of Honors

• University Faculty and Staff Outside of

Honors

• University Administrators

• Society

Research Framework -Stakeholders

Characteristics

Expectations

Recruitment

Orientation

Motivation

Retention

Development

Achievements

Feedback & Rewards

Honors Effects

Stakeholder Attributes of Interest Using Lifecycle Perspective

Research Framework – Honors Courses

Fink, 2003

Research Framework- Honors Courses

NCHC Desired Learning Outcomes

•written and oral communication skills,

• ability to analyze and synthesize a broad range of material,

• critical thinking skills,

• creative process, and

• analytical problem solving.

21st Century Meta-Skills

• FEELING: including empathy, intuition, and social intelligence.

• SEEING: the ability to think whole thoughts, also known as systems thinking.

• DREAMING: the metaskill of applied imagination.

• MAKING: mastering the design process, including skills for devising prototypes.

• LEARNING: the autodidactic ability to learn new skills at will.

Neumeier, Marty (2013)

Research Framework- Honors CoursesRelevant Honors

Pedagogies

Characteristics of Honors

Learning Activities

(Wolfensberger, 2012)

Modes of Honors Learning

in NCHC’s “Definition of

Honors Education”

• Active Learning

• Inquiry Learning

• Project-Based Learning

• Collaborative Learning

• Service-Learning

• City As Text

• PRISM

• Offering Bounded Freedom

• Community-Building

• Enhancing Academic

Competence

• Research & Creative

Scholarship

• Interdisciplinary Learning

• Service Learning &

Leadership

• Experiential Learning

• Learning Communities

Relevant Dimensions of Honors Teaching and Learning Activities

Research Framework- Honors Courses

Assessment Type Assessment

Structure

Assessors

• Formative

• Summative

• Informal

Comments

• Rubrics

• Tests

• Faculty

• Peers

• Industry/

AlumniRelevant Dimensions of Feedback and Assessment in Honors

Research Framework- Honors Courses

Relevant Situational Factors in Honors Course Design

• (Inter)Disciplinary Setting

• Class Size

• Characteristics of Students

• Budget

• Support Staff

• Physical Space

• Support Facilities

• Technology

Sample Situational Factors in Honors Course Design

Research Framework- Honors OrganizationsGuiding

Principles

Governance Culture Curriculum Processes Resources Contextual

FactorsMission

Vision

Values

Desired

Outcomes

Leadership

Structure

Community Setting

Coursework

Required

Co-Curricular

Activities

Capstone

Experiences

Technology

Outcome

Assessment

Admission

Hiring

Advising

Enrollment

Growth

Incentives

Communication

Strategic Planning

Fundraising

Events

Participation in

Honors Community

Outcome

Assessment

Budget

Scholarships

Staff & Faculty

Facilities

Housing

Technology

Program Size

& Capacity

Reasons for

Program

Existence

Key Attributes of Honors Organizations

Research Framework – External Environment

Honors Organization Key Environmental Factors

• University Setting

• Historical Context

• Country & Local Settings

• Professional Honors Organizations

• Government Programs & Non-profits

• For-profit Support Programs

• Society

Implications

An attempt at a comprehensive framework to guide honors research

• Identify Key Questions

• Annual Surveys

• Meta-analyses

• Targeted Studies

The Goal:

• Develop a comprehensive Field Guide to Honors Education in the next five years

Reflection

Collaboration?

Thank You!

Beata Jones, Ph.D.

[email protected]