towards a semantic modeling of learners for social networks asma ounnas, ilaria liccardi, hugh...

14
Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group University of Southampton, UK Presented by Rosta Farzan Personalized Adaptive Web Systems Lab

Upload: kara-lanier

Post on 15-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks

Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White

Learning Technology GroupUniversity of Southampton, UK

Presented by Rosta Farzan

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems Lab

Page 2: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

Introduction

• Social networks is important in distant learning– Physically different location and different life– Need friends who share same interests,

preferences, and learning experiences

• Learner model– Building social networks of learners

• This work– An extension of Friend of a Friend (FOAF)

ontology to build learner model for social networks

Page 3: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

Outline

• Existing learner models• Learner’s feature taxonomy• Comparison of the learners model• Extension of FOAF as a learner model• Conclusion & Future Work

Page 4: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

PAPI

• IEE LTSC• Data interchange specification

– Describes learner information for communication among cooperating systems

• Personal information– General information e.g. name, address, …

• 6 Categories– Relations information

• Learners’ relationships with others e.g. classmate– Security information

• Access rights– Preference information

• Public information about the learner’s preferences e.g. learning style, language, …

– Performance information• Records of learner’s measure performance e.g. grades

– Portfolio information• Learner’s projects and works

Page 5: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

IMS LIP

• Similar to learner's CV• Focus on Learner’s history and learning experience• Lifelong model

– Transfer between institution• 11 categories

– Identification: name, e-mail, …– Goal: Learning, Career, …– Qualification, Certification, License

• From recognized authorities– Activity: learning activities in any state of completion– Interest: hobbies and recreational– Relationship: between core data elements– Competency: skills and experiences– Accessibility: language capabilities, learning preferences, disabilities– Transcript: official academic achievements– Affiliation: organization– Security Key: password

Page 6: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

eduPerson

• By Internet2 and Educause• Facilitate communication between higher

education institution• Similar to employee information system• Detailed description• 43 elements in 2 categories

– General attributes• Information about the learner, the organization, and

references– New attributes

• To facilitate collaboration between the institution• E.g. Affiliation, ID for authentication, …

Page 7: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

Dolog LP

• By Dolog et al• Uses RDF and learners’ ontologies

– For personalization services• 5 categories

– Identification• Name, telephone, address, email, …

– Other user features• Preferences, Goal, and Interests

– Study performance• Performance, portfolio, and certification

– Human resource planning• Organization

– Calendar• Appointments and events

Page 8: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

FOAF

• RDF vocabulary• Properties and classes to describe

– People, documents, and organizations• For building communities and social groupings• 5 categories

– Basic information• Name, email, images, homepage

– Personal information• Weblogs, interests, publications

– Online accounts– Projects and groups

• Projects, organizations– Documents and images

• E.g. personal profile document, logo

Page 9: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

Learner’s Features Taxonomy

Page 10: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

Comparison of the Learner Models

Page 11: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

Comparison of the Learner Models

• PAPI, LMS LIP, and Dolog PL– Best for adaptive e-learning

• eduPerson– Collecting data and transferring between institution

• FOAF– Automatic personalization– Describes learner’s relations with others by pointing to learner “knows”

Page 12: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

Comparison of the Learner Models

Page 13: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

Extending FOAF

• Advantages of FOAF– RDF– 1.5 millions FOAF documents– FOAF vocabularies evolves – FOAF files are easy to create– Facilitates locating people with similar interest– Security and privacy issues are taken care

Page 14: Towards a Semantic Modeling of Learners for Social Networks Asma Ounnas, ILaria Liccardi, Hugh Davis, David Millard, and Su White Learning Technology Group

Personalized Adaptive Web Systems

Extending FOAF

• Required feature for using FOAF as a learner model– Personal Data

• Spoken and written language, gender, learning styles, preferred modules

– Relations• Taking courses, taking module, …

• Evaluating strength of the relationships between learners– Algorithm for building social networks of

learners