Román AlvarezPATH - Honduras

Towards an Integrated Property Administration Model in Honduras

Land and Poverty Conference 2016: Scaling up Responsible Land Governance

Content Background - New Model Context

About Honduras Institutional Reforms The National Property Administration System (SINAP) SURE Timeline

Current Property Administration Model Scenario

Front-back Office client service schema Integrating certified professionals into the chain Outsourcing services toward a public-private partnership Evolution of SURE (1.0) to SINAP

BackgroundNew Model Context

About Honduras

Honduras is a country in Central America.

Area: 112.492 km2 Population: 8.7 million 45% of the population lives below the

poverty line. 20% lives in extreme poverty.

80% of population lives in informal settlements, not having any property title that would provide legal certainty.

70% of parcels nationwide have registration irregularities or are not registered at all.

The new model actively involves different stakeholders in the management of land and property rights, both private and public, under a decentralized service delivery scheme on a common platform.

To improve the new model it was necessary to generate:

Legal reforms,

Technological platform,

Mechanized digitization of physical property books,

New cadastral scheme linked to the folio real registry.

New Model Issues

Institutional Reform

In 2004, the Property Law was enacted to create theProperty Institute IP, bringing together:

- Property Registry, - National Cadaster - National Geographic Institute

and creating an entity for Land Regularization.

National Geographic

Institute

Land Regularizati

on

Property Registry

NationalCadaster

Property Institute IP

National Property Administration System(SINAP)

SINAP has three key subsystems:

Unified Registries System (SURE), which integrates information relating to the property rights.

Territorial Planning Norms Registry (RENOT), which records Norms and territorial planning laws reflected as use and occupancy restrictions on properties.

National Territorial Information System (SINIT), which registers and discloses national mapping information.

SINAPSINITINDES SURERENOT

GEONODES

Systems

SURE-SINAP Timeline

2002

PAAR

Folio RealCadaster - Registry

Automation

2003

PATH

201220132014

Capital MarketImprovement

-Property Law-Territorial Planning Law-Forest Law Proposal

SURESINITRENOT

SINREC

1998 OGC - ISO/TC 211

SINAP Evolution Plan

• LADM Standard• Separate

Business | Media | Process

• Open Source Priority• SOA N-layer Architecture• OGC / ISO Standards• Private – Public Alliance• Software Factories SWF

2006

OSGeo Found LADM ISO 19152CCDM - FIG

Design SINAP II

2016

DevelopmentSINAP II

2007

IDEStandards

Evolution and Versioning Schema

-Nation Plan Law

2010

SIGIT

SINAPSURE | SINIT | RENOT

SIT - MOSEF

ISO-BIM -IFC

SOLAOpenTenure

Cadastre2014

-Public and Private Patnership Law

CCDM - FIG

Juticalpa

Olanchito

Trujillo

Roatán

Comayagua

Nacaome

Choluteca

Distrito Central

Danlí

Yuscarán

Siguatepeque

YoroProgreso

La CeibaTela

San Pedro Sula

Puerto Cortés

Santa Bárbara

Gracias

Santa Rosa

La PazMarcala

IntibucáOcotepeque

• 16 of 24 Registry Offices.• 900 active users.

• 1.1 million parcels.• 1.2 million real properties

• 239,000 cadastre parcels linked to real properties

• 5.2 million scanned property book images.

• 250.000 transactions• 1.8 million user consults.

29.0 million US$ dollars registry service income per year.

The Unified Registries SystemSURE

Registy Office - Digitized (13)

Parcially Digitized (3)

Registry Office - not Digitized (8)

Current Property Administration Model

Scenario

Current Scenario Issues

New efforts are deployed as of 2013 to take the Property Administration System to a scenario in line with the new institutional context, international service delivery trends and technology adoption.

For this new stage the following are being implemented:

Front-back Office client service structure

Integrating professionals into the property administration chain

Outsourcing services toward a public-private partnership

Evolution of SURE (1.0) to SINAP

Front-back Office client service schema

SURE

(Folio Real System)

Front Office

(Client Service)

Back Office

(Processing Area)

The Front – Office was separated for submission of applications, form revision of document authenticity and compliance of requirements,

A window for Cadastral services was included.

The Back Office or processing area is physically separated, handling substance revision of documents, which determines approval or denial of the property transaction.

Expedite Process Workflows with the Front-Back Office Schema

User

Front Office

Back Office

Reception

Digitizing

Distribution / Inscription

GIS Linking

GIS Validation / Update

Archive

Retrieve

User User

Digitizing on demand

Integrating certified professionals into the property administration chain

Property Institue

-System-Data Center-Services

MunicipalitiesCertified Proffesionals-Notaries-Surveyors

(Policies)

-Cartography-Regularization-Other Registries

OutsourcingOperator

FiniteProjects

Benefits of Integrating certified professionals into the property Chain

• Transfer of responsibilities from the Institution to the professionals.

• Enhances the outsourcing of Technical Jobs.

• Easy integration of the Municipalities as Associated Centers.

• Take advantage of Public and Private Partnership (Cadastre2014).

• Sustainability - reducing the cost of massive surveying projects (Cadastre 2014).

Phase 1: Cortés, Francisco Morazán.

Phase 2: Comayagua, Yoro, Atlántida, Colón, Islas de la Bahía, Valle, Choluteca, Gracias a Dios.

Phase 3: El Paraíso, Olancho, La Paz, Intibucá.Phase 4: Santa Bárbara, Copán, Ocotepeque, Lempira.

Property Registry to become Front Offices

Regional Processing Center (Back-Office)

Regional Border Zone

Transition ProposalJuticalpa

Olanchito

Trujillo

Roatán

Comayagua

Nacaome

Choluteca

Distrito Central

Danlí

Yuscarán

Siguatepeque

YoroEl Progreso

La CeibaTela

San Pedro Sula

Puerto Cortés

Santa Bárbara

Gracias

Santa Rosa

La PazMarcala

IntibucáOcotepeque

Outsourcing services toward a public-private partnership

Evolution of SURE (1.0) to SINAP

SOA

N

-laye

r

SIN

AP

Mod

el

GAT

EWAY

WEB

CON

TAIN

ERD

ATA

TIE

R

Data

Logic

PresentationExternal

Internal

JBOSS Wildfly

EJB

JNDI

Web Services

DBMS

FRO

NT

TIER

Data

Logic

External

Internal

COREProcess

Presentation

UtilitaryServices

EntityServices

TaskServices

MapsImages

Portlets

Viewers

Enterprise Componets

WSRP

Presentation

OracleMongoDB

ApplicationServices

BPMN

LegacySystems

CORE

Connection Tier

Persistence Tier

Connection Tier

Persistence Tier

Evolution of SURE (1.0) to SINAP

Policies

Rules Engine

Presentation Tier Middle Tier

- Enrichment

TopDown(XSD)

- Throughput- Transaction- Compensation- Retry- Failover- Timeout

GatewayBroker

Adaptors

<xml> BPMN

- Enrichment- Compiling versioning- Cache

Parties

Charges

RPI

Vehicles

DEI

Etc…

Property Institute

IPDEI

IPRV

IPRNP

Bank

Municipalities

DEI

IP

INA

ICF

SEFIN

Etc…

ServiceRequest

Remote Local Local LocalRemote

Loc

al

CORE - SINAP Model

Orchestor

Adaptors

Engine

Conclusions

1. Transactional time and cost reduction is the top focus sought by the modernization of the property administration system in Honduras in order to generate wealth and fuel the economy. Prioritizing these objectives help all the modernization efforts be seen as a means rather than an end.

3. The regulatory framework reform was the trigger to transform the property administration system in Honduras, which required high-level political will to restructure key budgetary, structural, and institutional aspects including territorial management binding laws.

5. One of the keys to success in adopting the property administration model was the restructuring of the institutional scheme, delimitating competences for key players across the chain that create, modify and affect property rights.

Conclusions

4. The Standards… Using the CCDM model for the development of SURE enabled the domain model to sustain itself nearly immutable over time and adapt itself to a more standardized version of LADM such as ISO 19152.

5. One of the greatest risks in technical, technological and financial sustainability faced by any property administration system lies in the protection against skilled staff turnover. The Honduras model considered from its onset, a solution that ensures the model its continuity by certifying professionals and establishing PPPs.

8. The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) approach applied to the property administration is a trend almost irreversible in developed countries. The outsourcing scheme in Honduras is currently underway and has required a contextual phase-in adaptation.

Conclusions

7. The adoption of the Front-Back Office scheme in Honduras enables to centralize the traceability, mutation and securitization in one single Operator, making best use of existing windows, such as banks, municipalities and CPs to serve the end user.

Thank you