towards establishing data harmonization for primary and … · 2019. 10. 2. · orama has received...

ORAMA has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776517

Towards establishing data harmonization for primary and

secondary raw materials in EuropeZoltán Horváth (MBFSZ) and Perttu Mikkola (GTK as Leader)

ORAMA has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776517

Meggen Raw Materials Days, 12th of September 2019

Content• Background

• ORAMA in general

• Data optimization for primary raw materials (WP1)

• Data optimization for secondary raw materials (WP2)

• Demonstration of a proper data service (WP3)

• Workshops, trainings, webinars (WP4)

• Clustering (WP5)

• Communication and dissemination (WP6)

• Summary and next steps

Meggen Raw Materials Days, 2019

The inability to easily produce reliable statistics about reserves, resources, stocks, and flows of raw materials needed for the

energy transition is a major issue for EU/EC

Background


ORAMA• Optimizing quality of information in Raw Material data collection across

Europe

• Both primary & secondary raw materials

• From 12/2017 to 11/2019

• 16 partners, 14 countries, 1.7 M€

• Advisory Board: 6 stakeholder organizations

• Including EFG

• Technical, scientific and overall coordination: GTK

• Coordinator: Perttu Mikkola, [email protected]


www.orama-h2020.eu

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.orama-h2020.eu/

Partners• Geological Surveys:• Finland• UK• France

• Norway• Ireland• Slovenia• Denmark and Greenland

• Spain• Hungary

• Other institutions:• Joint Research Centre (EC)• EMPA• UNU

• WEEE Forum• Technische Universität Berlin• Chalmers Tekniska Högskola• Universiteit Leiden


WP1: Data optimization for primary raw materilas (led by BGS)

• National databases

• Differ in content, system used, updating frequency etc.

• European platforms have been developed

• Eg. European Minerals Knowledge Data Platform by

Minerals4EU, http://minerals4eu.brgm-rec.fr/

• Compiled automatically by harvesting the national databases

• Meaningful resource/reserve numbers only in fraction of

deposits and mineralizations -> adding up doesn’t produce

European resources/reserves


http://minerals4eu.brgm-rec.fr/

CRIRSCO based

Russian or based on RussianNationalNone

Reporting codes used in EU

R, UNFCR

R, UNFCR, UNFC

R: Russian based

UNFC: testedUNFC prescribed

UNFCwastested

UNFC andPRMS aretested and used

Internationallyrecognizedstandard is preferred

Federalstructure-differencies

Provincialstructure-differencies

JORC is preferred


We do not have a joint language.

WP1: Primary raw materials (led by BGS)

1. United Nations Framework Classification (UNFC)

2. Bridging document between CRIRSCO and UNFC

3. Practical Exercises in Reporting Resource and Reserve Data

according to the United Nations Framework Classification (UNFC)

4. Decision flow tools for classifying resource data according to the UNFC

5. Worked examples

UK polyhalite,

Spanish Copper,

Hungarian aggregates


UNFC system• Better possibilities for sustainable resource management

• Bridging documents from other systems exist and new ones can be compiled

• INSPIRE data service can embeed UNFC or other systems

• Widely known but not widely used

• The interest and application are increasing

• Recently voluntary in most countries

• Case studies show:

national systems may be

transferred into the UNFC/UNRMS


From national inventory to the UNFC via CRIRSCO

Transdanubia-Hungary

Largevolume of resourcesand reservesfor stonesand smallamount forsands.

• Even more scattered than primary raw materials

• Different waste groups: end-of-life vehicles (ELV), photovoltaic panels (PV P), mine waste,waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)

• National differences in data collection

• Lack of compositional data

• Confidentiality issues


WP2: SRM – Challanges (UNU,WEEE FORUM)

WP3: Demonstration of applicability of the datamodel (BRGM)

Responsible authorities including Geological Surveys have to register mineral

resources, reserves or endowments with the indication of the reporting codes,

classification systems.

• This infrastructure enables the sharing of spatial information among public

sector organisations, facilitate public access to information across Europe.

• Based on the infrastructures for spatial information established and operated by the

Member States of the European Union.

It addresses

34 spatial

data themes

needed for

environmental

applications.

This Directive came into force on 15 May

2007. Has to implemented in by 2021.

Mineral resources

Land Use Data..

Social data (population)

Environmentdata…

Insfrastructure data..

http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/Zoltan Horváth (MBFSZ)

WP3: Demonstration of applicability of the datamodel (BRGM)

ORAMA_WP4_1_Guidance To Data Harmonization For PRM and SRM as well

The overall aim of the Technical Guideline is to provide a credible and practical harmonization methodology on how to improve data collection methods for data providers, governments, policy makers and other interested stakeholders in Europe. The Technical Guidelines principles is expected to support the improvement of the data knowledge base across Member States.

WP4: Guidances, training materials, workshops, webinars (GEUS)

T4.2: Development of training materials based on the recommendations and technical guidelines – PPT and PDF

D4.2_Training Materials_Ispra_ Batteries_TUB_FV

D4.2_Training_Materials_Ispra_ELVs

T4.3: Workshop and training sessions with a range of stakeholders, including data providers – ORAMA & JRC workshop in Ispra

• This workshop focused on sharing the outcomes of the ORAMA project.

• Emphasis was on the raw material data network in the EU looking at data collection, presentation and use. Parallel workshops were dedicated to introducing the detailed results and guidance for primary and secondary raw materials data.

• Clustering event: poster session where results of the ORAMA research were displayed

• Raw Materials Policies andKnowledge Management inthe EU: forward looking

• Social and environmentalknowledge on raw materialsupply chains

• Updating Knowledge onMember States' Governanceof Exploration and Mining

• Strengthening theknowledge-base on specificSecondary Raw Materials

11th – 12th

June2019

12th – 13th June 2019

T4.3: Workshop and training sessions with a range of stakeholders, including data providers – ORAMA & JRC workshop in Ispra

Top left: JRC workshopTop right: JRC & ORAMA –workshop PRM Buttom right: JRC & ORAMA – workshop SRM

T4.3: Workshop and training sessions with a range of stakeholders, including data providers

Representatives of the relevant ministries andauthorities, the industry, experts will be invited andfocus will be on hands-on exercises based on thetraining material developed in T4.2 as well as thetraining material produced in WP1 and WP2 about thecollection ofdata.:D4.3: Report on feedback and other outcomes of thetrainingsessions (M22)

Webinars

• Mining Waste 30th September 2019 14:00 –15:30 CEST

• PRM 2nd October 2019 13:00 – 15:00 CEST• Batteries and ELVs 16th October 2019 14:00

– 15:30 CEST• WEEE/PV panels 17th October 2019 14:00 –

15:30 CESThttps://www.eventbrite.co.uk/o/orama-project-consortium-26376601743

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/o/orama-project-consortium-26376601743

Some results: WP5 (EC JRC)

• More than 500 hundreds projects were analysed

• Clustering with clustering event (RMW 2018)

• Networking with identificatiom of stakeholders

• Synergies between relevant projects, more than halfwere dealing with secondary and recycling

• Support of organizatin of the Ispra Workshop


WP6 (led by GTK)• Flyer

• Poster

• Dissemination on many international

events: conferences, workshops, Raw Material Week

(Brussels), UNECE EGRM (Geneva), EU-wide meetings

• Support of webinars, trainings

• Exploitation Plan: monitoring of using ORAMA results e.g. by RMSG, EGS

Data optimization for primary raw materilas ( BGS)

Adopt and

enforce policies

Ensure

funding

Improve/build

frameworks

Improve

reporting

Monitor

Stake-holders

Networking for data harmoniza-tion

The use of UNFC as a obligatory reporting system for

national authorised bodies for reporting of resource data for collation at a European level

Cooperation between national geological surveys and

professional bodies, such as EuroGeoSurveys, to share best practice

Ensure funding for data collection and collation on a

European level after the current update of the European Minerals Yearbook (Mintell4EU project)

Include UNFC definitions in INSPIRE code lists and data models

Continued development of case studies and bridging documents showing the application of UNFC

Ensure definitions used in resource data adheres to

definitions as defined by UNFC

National authorised bodies to develop data to cover data gaps for undiscovered resources

Short term

1-3 years

Medium term

3-5 years

Long term

> 5 years

Industry, Reporting Authorities, Policy Makers,

Statistical Agencies, Geological Surveys,

academia

Industry, Reporting authorities, Statistical

Agencies, Policy makers, Geological Surveys

Geological Surveys, Law Enforcements Agencies,

Policy Makers

To final recommendations

To final recommendations

EnsureFunding

On potential recyclers (processing companies, equipment providers, research institutions,

etc.) of MIN deposits.

On national/EU legislative tools on how to start exploiting an interesting deposit, once

economically possible.

Data providers and data collectors under the supervision of the European Commission agree on the single system for MIN classification, harmonisation, collection and reporting managed preferably under single organisation.

Merge knowledge from Minerals4EU/ProSUM, SmartGround and COST MINEA- UNECE MIN classification, harmonisation, collection and reporting frameworks.

For research of interesting deposits (MIN characterisation projects) to obtain basic

information needed to estimate potential recovery.

For creation and maintenance of the single system for MIN classification, harmonisation,

collection and reporting system.

Data providers, interesting deposit owners and research organisations to establish MIN characterisation projects.

For data providers to share and update information in the system.

Improvereporting

Short term1-3 years

Medium term3-5 years

Long term> 5 years

Improve

framework conditions

Mine Waste

Stake-holders

Data Providers, Policy

Makers, European Commission






Summary• UNFC has high potential in solving the challanges for

PRM and SRM as well.Flexibility in respect to both data quality & raw material

• CRIRSCO/national codes are needed also in future

• Data on both PRM and SRM need to be comparable, iffor nothing else than helping the mining and/or recyclingdiscussion (energy consupmtion issues may beimportant)

• Milestone in the data infrustructure for PRM and SRM inthe EU, GEOERA is a logical continuation.

Accessing the results from ORAMA

• Homepage https://orama-h2020.eu/

• Register as stakeholder

• All deliverables available for download

• Webinars coming up, early autumn

• Final event

• ½-day Planned to be in connection with/during EU “Raw materials Week” in November 2019.

Meggen’s Ram Materials Days, 2019

https://orama-h2020.eu/stakeholder-registration/

Thank you for your attention!


towards establishing data harmonization for primary and … · 2019. 10. 2. · orama has received...

Documents