towards excellence in higher education through quality awareness
DESCRIPTION
Theme 2: Different approaches to QA and their impact on efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability. Towards Excellence in Higher Education through Quality Awareness. Dr. Dawid Wosik Quality Assurance Coordinator Higher Colleges of Technology, Fujairah Colleges - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Dr. Dawid Wosik
Quality Assurance CoordinatorHigher Colleges of Technology, Fujairah Colleges
e-mail: [email protected]
Towards Excellence in Higher Education through Quality Awareness
Theme 2: Different approaches to QA and their impact on efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology2
1. Quality as a result of being aware
2. Integration of the “quality models”
3. Spreading quality awareness
4. Conclusion
Agenda
2
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology3
Quality in higher education is a very broad concept. The multi-dimensional, multi-level and dynamic nature of this concept consists of many aspects, i.e. the contextual settings of an educational model, an institutional strategy, and the specific standards within a given system, program or discipline
(Vlãsceanu, L., Grünberg, L., Pârlea, D.)
There is a need to strike a balance between accountability for quality and quality improvement
(Stensaker, 2003)
1. Quality as a result of being aware
3
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology4
Therefore:
Quality is a result – the result of being aware. Being aware of reality but what’s more important – being aware of the future
Spreading awareness of the requirements is the first and necessary step to see a horizon of opportunities for quality improvement
There is a need to be knowledgeable not only of the specific requirements (accreditation standards), but also those reflected in different quality models (e.g. ISO 9001)
1. Quality as a result of being aware
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology5
Is there any space for integrating accreditation and ISO 9001?
Accreditation as a “guarantee of quality” means:– Recognition– Conformance to standards which are “tailored” for higher
education– Reference point – extremely needed for quality to be enhanced– Accountability for quality…
…which still needs to be linked to a dynamic quality management system
2. Integration of the “quality models”
5
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology6
Is there any space for integrating accreditation and ISO 9001?
ISO 9001 as a “guarantee of improvement” means:– Quality management system– Continuous focus on quality management principles– Linking quality requirements and strategy– Conformance to general quality management system
requirements and therefore…
…ongoing problems with an interpretation of the standard
2. Integration of the “quality models”
6
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology7
Accreditation seen as an input to quality improvement process
2. Integration of the “quality models”
7
Time
Quality level (QL)
Acceptable QL= accreditation
Quality improvement
Quality management process
Input
Output
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology8
Internal audit (ISO 9001) as a self-assessment tool (accreditation)
A self-assessment, being an initial stage of the accreditation procedure, aims at evaluating the degree to which the accreditation standards are met
An internal audit, the requirement included in the ISO 9001 standard, is a systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which audit criteria are fulfilled
(ISO 9000)
3. Spreading quality awareness
8
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology9
“Accreditation audit” as a self-assessment tool
Possible integration of the self-assessment with the internal audit leads to the following recommendations:– Accreditation standards to be included in the auditing criteria– Staff from each level of an organization to be involved in the
auditing process– Auditing interview to be focused on the accreditation
requirements– Conclusions from the audits to be formulated based on the
above
3. Spreading quality awareness
9
(Poznań University of Economics, Faculty of Commodity Science, Poland)
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology10
Internal communication
Top management shall ensure that appropriate communication processes are established within the organization and that communication takes place regarding the effectiveness of the quality management system
Management representative’s responsibility is to:– Report to top management on the performance of the quality
management system and any need for improvement– Guarantee the promotion of awareness of customer
requirements throughout the organization
3. Spreading quality awareness
10
(ISO 9001)
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology11
Spreading quality awareness in Higher Colleges of Technology
Academic, Advancement and Accreditation – AAA (a unit at the central level of the organization)
Quality Assurance Coordinators – QAC’s (appointed at campuses)
Quality Improvement Advisory Committee (consisting of the Dean, the Supervisor of the AAA and all the QAC’s)
Quality Improvement System (a web-based application)
3. Spreading quality awareness
11
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology12
3. Spreading quality awareness
12
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology13
Promotion of quality awareness via the QIS
Stakeholder Satisfaction (e.g. employer/industry satisfaction with program)
Program Accreditation (e.g. external accreditation of programs)
Course Delivery and Assessment (e.g. evaluation of courses by faculty)
Student Academic Success (e.g. pass rate)
Resource Utilization (e.g. teaching workload)
3. Spreading quality awareness
13
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology14
Although an integration of different requirements (increasing of quality awareness) may be achieved by institutions themselves, much can still be done by national and international quality assurance agencies.
“Core knowledge”, rules, and examples of good practice as a basis of quality assurance in higher education should be extrapolated as widely as possible to better serve the pursuit of quality in higher education
(London Communiqué)
4. Conclusion
14
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology15
“(…) The point is that quality assurance agencies around the world, through their evaluations, institutional visits and close contact with higher education institutions, sit on a substantive amount of knowledge about quality that seldom finds its way into formal, written evaluation reports. Most likely, this is information that is left out of the knowledge acquired, due to formal requirements with respect to a given evaluation or anxiety that the role as ’independent agency’ may be questioned; however, by not addressing these issues, quality assurance agencies also miss an opportunity to influence the accountability debate in higher education (…)”
(Stensaker, 2008)
4. Conclusion
15
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology17
— Bologna Process Stocktaking, Report from a working group appointed by the Bologna Follow-up Group to the Ministerial Conference in London, May 2007
— ISO 9000:2005 Quality management systems – Fundamentals and vocabulary, International Organization for Standardization
— ISO 9001:2008 Quality management systems – Requirements, International Organization for Standardization
— Stensaker B., Trance, transparency, transformation: the impact of external quality monitoring in higher education, „Quality in Higher Education”, 2003, Vol. 9, No. 2, Carfax Publishing, p. 151-159
— Stensaker B., Outcomes of Quality Assurance: A discussion of Knowledge, Methodology and Validity, „Quality in Higher Education”, 2008, Vol. 14, No. 1, Carfax Publishing, p. 3-13
References
INQAAHE Conference, Abu Dhabi 2009 Higher Colleges of Technology18
— The HCT Quality Improvement System – An Overview, How Can We Make HCT Even Better, Academic Advancement and Accreditation, Higher Colleges of Technology, 2008
— Vlãsceanu, L., Grünberg, L., and Pârlea, D., 2007, Quality Assurance and Accreditation: A Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions (Bucharest, UNESCO-CEPES) Papers on Higher Education
— Wosik D., Quality strategy in managing university in the light of the Bologna Process and criteria of university accreditation – experiences of Faculty of Commodity Science, [in:] K. Leja (ed.), “Management problems at the knowledge-based university”, published by Division of Knowledge and Information Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk 2006, p. 131-145
References