towards more sustainable and market-based payment for ecosystem services a pilot project in lijiang,...
TRANSCRIPT
Towards More Sustainable and
Market-based Payment for Ecosystem
Services
A Pilot Project in Lijiang, China
Lu Zhi
How does CI approach payment for ecosystem services programs? Target areas for payment for ecosystem services and
determine opportunity costs Integrate ecological processes and development
needs into payment mechanism design across priority landscapes
Replicate and scale up successful models, and share new tools and results with key decision-makers
Foster enabling conditions: provide data on service flows, value of services, policy frameworks, governance, market development, and structure implementing entity
Target areas: Bundling services in Madagascar
Each individual ES layer was:
• Z-normalized (mean=0 and standard deviation=1)
• Combined using equal weights
• Scaled between 0 and 1
BUNDLED ES: percent overlap of three services
Target areas: Opportunity costs in Madagascar
PROBABILITY OF DEFORESTATION
ADDITIONALITY: Bundled ES * Probability of deforestation
HIGH OPPORTUNITY COSTS
TARGETED PAYMENTS FOR ES
BIODIVERSITY: number of mammals, birds & amphibians weighted by threat status
CARBON: above- and below-ground biomass
WATER: water quality weighted by human population, rice & mangroves
BUNDLED ES: percent overlap of three services
WATER: water quality weighted by human population, rice & mangroves
Incorporate ecological processes and services into land use planning and decision-
making: Landscapes
Integrate hydrological processes within a systematic conservation planning framework
Bundle biodiversity and ES into conservation and development
Leverage ES into sustainable financing for conservation landscapes
• Generate a body of knowledge and analytical lessons in:
• Mapping key features of ecosystem processes and services• Addressing issues in scale and management (biomes and institutions)• Incorporating ES into land use and development planning (costs and trade-offs)• Economic valuation and design of PES mechanisms (markets, stakeholders, policy)
• Understanding ES and landscape resiliency with change
Case Study: China
• China, with 1.3 billion people, is listed as one of the 13 most water-deficient countries in the world.
• China pollution trends are threatening economic growth, human health and watershed ecosystems. (63% of monitored sections in 7 major river basins can not meet standard for drinking water resource’s quality)
• Water distribution is extremely uneven in time and space.
The root causes of issues…and solutions
• The environmental benefits and relevant economic gains have been allocated unfairly between the protectors, beneficiaries, the destructors and victims.
• PES (Payment for Environmental Services) is the generic name of a variety of arrangements through which the beneficiaries of ecosystem services pay back to the providers of those services.
Existing applications of PES or eco-compensation in China
• Huge conservation incentive programs exist in China (the planned investment for the Natural Forest Conservation Program and the Grain to Green Program is $100 billion)
• These schemes are based on top-down government decisions, with little attention to the demand or supply forces (market) behind the implementation and public participation
Key words
Environmental Storm
Government investment on Env.
Establish long-term mechanism
Introduce market mechanism
Market-based PES mechanism• a new market is created and revenues are collected
• an explicit link is made between those who benefit from an environmental service and those who provide the same services
Financing Mechanism
Payment Mechanism
BeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiary
Land userLand user Land user Land user Land user Land user Land user
Governance structure
Environmental
Financing Mechanism
Payment Mechanism
BeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiary
Land userLand user Land user Land user Land user Land user Land user
Governance structure
Financing Mechanism
Payment Mechanism
BeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiary
Land userLand user Land user Land user Land user Land user Land user
Financing Mechanism
Payment Mechanism
BeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiaryBeneficiary
Land userLand user Land user Land user Land user Land user Land user
Governance structure
Governance structure
Environmental services
Factors determining the ease or difficulty of establishing a PES system
• The “distance” between cause (providers) and effect (beneficiaries)
• The numbers of service providers and service beneficiaries
• Collecting beneficiary payments and making transfers payments to service providers (channel availability)
• The legal and institutional framework
• The outcome monitoring system
Illustration of a potential PES application: the cases of Lijiang
The environmental servicesES Service Service
providersService
Beneficiaries
Improved water quality for landscape services
Farmers around Lashihai lake
Visitors to the old town
Maintenance of biodiversity
Farmers around Lashihai lake
Visitors to Lashihai
ES Service Service providers
Service Beneficiaries
Improved water quality for landscape services
Farmers around Lashihai lake
Visitors to the old town
Maintenance of biodiversity
Farmers around Lashihai lake
Visitors to Lashihai
ES identification
ES valuation
Payment level
Institutional arrangement
ES identification
ES valuation
Payment level
Institutional arrangement
•Global benefits are traditionally not included in local PES schemes. •The payment collecting channel of visitors was available – easy to implement
Quantification of the ESES
identification
ES valuation
Payment level
Institutional arrangement
ES identification
ES valuation
Payment level
Institutional arrangement
Services Median WTP (US$)
Annual visitors Value of ES
(US$)
Water improvement
1 4,000,000
(Lijiang Old Town)
4,000,000
Bird biodiversity
1 65,000
(Lashi NR)
65,000
Services Median WTP (US$)
Annual visitors Value of ES
(US$)
Water improvement
1 4,000,000
(Lijiang Old Town)
4,000,000
Bird biodiversity
1 65,000
(Lashi NR)
65,000
• Estimating the costs of provision (minimum level) ► Water improvement (Agriculture income losses to farmers): 0 ► Birds biodiversity (Losses to farmers from the bird sanctuary): US$250,000• Estimating the theoretical value (maximum level)
Potential PES options• Environment friendly agriculture through
carefully designed capacity building campaigns and extension services
► Lower fertilizer and pesticide inputs and
improved land use
► Organic farming under proper
conditions (may influence birds due to
greenhouse)
ES identification
ES valuation
Payment level
Institutional arrangement
ES identification
ES valuation
Payment level
Institutional arrangement
Proposed compensation standard(based on WTP)
ES identification
ES valuation
Payment level
Institutional arrangement
ES identification
ES valuation
Payment level
Institutional arrangement
Water improvementDomesticvisitors
Internationalvisitors
Total
Increase to current entrance fee
0.25% 1.25%
Amount (US$) 0.05 0.25
Funds generated (US$/year)
115,785 27,420 143,205
Water improvementDomesticvisitors
Internationalvisitors
Total
Increase to current entrance fee
0.25% 1.25%
Amount (US$) 0.05 0.25
Funds generated (US$/year)
115,785 27,420 143,205
Bird biodiversityDomesticvisitors
Internationalvisitors
Total
Collect entrance fee(US$)
1 5
Funds generated (US$/year)
50,000 75,000 125,000
Bird biodiversityDomesticvisitors
Internationalvisitors
Total
Collect entrance fee(US$)
1 5
Funds generated (US$/year)
50,000 75,000 125,000
Institutional set up
• Special fund
► financial transparency
► public participation
• Coordinating body• Outcome monitoring• Enhance public awareness
ES identification
ES valuation
Payment level
Institutional arrangement
ES identification
ES valuation
Payment level
Institutional arrangement
Growth creates environmental risks….
…but also opportunities for innovation and reformation
Thanks!