TOWARDS THE FIRST TOWARDS THE FIRST FERMI SNR CATALOGFERMI SNR CATALOG

F. Giordano1, T. Brandt2

&F. Acero2, F. de Palma1, J. Hewitt2

for the Fermi Collaboration

1University and INFN Bari2NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

F. Giordano 2

Of the 78 SNRs with GeV associations detected in the 2-year Fermi-LAT catalog (2FGL) roughly 45% are expected to be chance coincidences.

Why a dedicated pipeline?Why a dedicated pipeline?

- Characterize GeV emission in regions containing known SNRs- Evaluate systematics, including diffuse models and variability- Examine multiwavelength correlation, including spectrum and morphology for radio, X-ray, and TeV and CO, maser, IR, …- Determine statistically significant SNR classification(s) and perform spectral modeling

With this project we intend to:

Where we started from…Where we started from…

We survey 278 known Galatic SNRs, identified mainly in radio compiled inGreen’s (2009) SNR Catalog

Some preliminary numbersSome preliminary numbers

SNR catalog results:

•52 of 278 Radio SNRs Detected Sources

•12 previously identified SNRs•7 are identified as NOT SNRs (PSR, PWN, HMB or AGN)•6 New significantly Extended SNR Candidates•27 Pointlike Candidates

• 14 more SNR-like• 17 more PSR-like

We have run our extended search tool We have run our extended search tool

We have a powerful and reliable tool to search for spatially extended source and determine the significance of the extension (Lande+ 2012)This pipeline resulted in 6 new significantly extended new SNR candidate

Fermi LAT best PSFGeV Extension

And Collected MW dataAnd Collected MW data

Green Circle: radio SNRCyan Circle: Fermi error circle

MW data are being used to confirm or discard the associations/identification

W49B Case

And studied Systematics from the And studied Systematics from the DiffuseDiffuse

- A grid of 8 models, varying the CR source distribution (SNR and Lorimer), the halo size (4 kpc and 10 kpc), and the HI spin temperature (150K and optically thin)

- free independent normalization coefficients for the inverse Compton component and for the components associated to HI and CO divided in 4 Galactocentric annuli

More plots: poster by T.J.Brandt+

PuppisA Case

1 2 3 4

L=30°

L=60°L=-60°

L=-30°

8

Preliminary results IPreliminary results I SNRs Radio vs GeV Flux SNRs Radio vs GeV Flux

Remnants known to be interacting with large molecular clouds show a good correlation

Young seems to be more out-liers

PSRs contamination is under investigation (MW data)

New Candidates

9

• Diameter traces SNR evolution (in Sedov stage R t2/5)• Interacting SNRs generally show higher L(GeV) than young SNRs

Preliminary results IIEffect of Environment?

10

Preliminary results IIIPreliminary results IIIEffect of Age?Effect of Age?

We also observe softening of the GeV index with increasing age due to changing emission mechanism? due to different environments?

• Young SNRs have generally harder GeV indices, but no clear trends for interacting SNRs

11

Concluding…Concluding…

• Procedure: We have set-up a dedicated procedure to characterize GeV Emission (MW data, extension, diffuse systematics…)

• Numbers: We now have 52 detected: 12 previously identified SNRs, 6 new extended, 27 point-like

• Classes:• Interacting SNRs

• Soft index (possible indication of a break @ GeV)• Higher density clouds act as target for high LGeV

• Young SNRs• Seem to have Harder index • No GeV spectral break• Lower density ISM/CSM

• “Collective” behavior• Radio-gamma correlation apparent, but not universal (SNR

upper limits are interesting constraint)• Luminosity and Index show correlation with age/environment

For more details see poster by T.J.Brandt’s

12

Preliminary results IVPreliminary results IVRadio vs GeV IndexRadio vs GeV Index

PRELIMINARY

• Young SNRs (i.e. RX J1713, VelaJr) show harder GeV index than inferred from radio ( Γ = 2+1 ), possibly suggesting an IC origin

• Many SNRs show soft GeV index suggesting a ~ GeV break.

Some results: PuppisASome results: PuppisA

see M.Lemoine-Goumard talk

Hewitt+ 2012