Upload File

town of hampton falls, nh

1
This Project was funded by a grant from the New Hampshire Estuaries Project, as authorized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to Section 320 of the Clean Water Act. ; ; ; ; STREAM BUFFER CHARACTERIZATION STUDY Coos Grafton Carroll Merrimack Cheshire Hillsborough Sullivan Belknap 70°56'15"W 70°56'15"W 70°52'30"W 70°52'30"W 70°48'45"W 70°48'45"W 42°52'30"N 42°52'30"N 42°56'15"N 42°56'15"N 43°0'0"N 43°0'0"N STREAM BUFFER CHARACTERIZATION STUDY Complex Systems Research Center Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space University of New Hampshire, Durham June, 2006 - Stream Buffers were created from 1:24,000-scale New Hampshire National Hydrography Dataset (NHNHD) stream centerlines (2005) - Impervious Surface data was generated from Landsat 5 TM (30m resolution) imagery (1990, 2000, 2005) - Land Use data was created from 1998 USGS Digital Orthophotoquads - Conservation Lands were based on April, 2006 version of GRANIT data layer The Complex Systems Research Center at the University of New Hampshire conducted a characterization of 2 nd order and higher streams within the Piscataqua/Coastal Basin of coastal New Hampshire. Existing GIS and remote sensing data were used to map a suite of anthropogenic factors, including land use, impervious surface coverage, and transportation infrastructure, within standard buffers around each stream segment. These factors were then analyzed to produce a categorical indicator representing the status of each stream. Processing began using the GRANIT hydrography data to identify perennial streams/rivers of order 2 or higher. Each stream segment was buffered by 150’ to support water quality analyses and by 300’to support habitat analyses, and the buffers were then combined with land use data derived from 1998 USGS Digital Orthophotoquads (DOQs). Finally, the buffer/land use composites were categorized based on the degree to which each buffer was impacted by human activity. Specifically, the buffer categories reflect the percent of land area within each buffer mapped as either developed, transportation, or agriculture, and include: Category Decision Rule Intact <10% impacted Mostly Intact 10-25% impacted Somewhat Modified 25-50% impacted Altered >50% impacted The buffer characterizations are depicted on the map and summarized by town in the tables below. The map also displays the 300’ buffers based on the degree of imperviousness in 2005, and the townwide conservation lands data. Impervious surface coverage by town for 1990, 2000, and 2005, as well as conservation lands acreage by town, are also reported. Town of Hampton Falls, NH Ê Project Description: Map Notes: 150-ft Buffer Stream Characterization Data Summary 300-ft Buffer Stream Characterization Data Summary For more information on this or other GRANIT products, please visit http://www.granit.sr.unh.edu 1. Stream reaches were identified, attributed, and buffered based on their extent from confluence to confluence. Rules were developed to guide the determination of segments in specific situations, e.g. where confluences existed on one river bank but not on the opposing bank. These procedures occasionally yielded very short stream segments and therefore relatively small buffers. 2. Because only 2 nd order and higher perennial streams were analyzed, some discontinuities exist in the input data set and thus in th e buffers. 3. At points of confluence and in other locations where buffers overlapped, the most impacted category was assigned to the overlap area. 4. Data was processed for the Piscataqua/Coastal Basin , which includes all or part of 48 municipalities. Six of these towns – Alton, Derry, Hampstead, Pittsfield, South Hampton, and Wolfeboro - were not included in the printed map set as they have no streams that extend into the Watershed. 5. Only 300’ buffers were analyzed with respect to impervious surface data due to the 30-meter resolution of the source satellite imagery. 6. Conservation lands shown on the map and summarized in the table include only those classified as permanently protected (Level 1, 2, or 2A) in the GRANIT database. Townwide Conservation Lands Data Summary Townwide Impervious Surface Data Summary Data Sources: Map by: Map Location: Surface Water Area Town Name Total Acres Acres % of Town Acres % of Town Acres % of Town Intact Mostly Intact Somewhat Modified Altered Town Name % of Land Area, 1990 % of Land Area, 2000 % of Land Area, 2005 Alton 53231 40629 76.3 12602 23.7 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Alton 2.1 3.0 3.5 Barrington 31117 29719 95.5 1399 4.5 3210 10.8 7.2 2.6 0.8 0.1 Barrington 2.6 4.0 4.7 Brentwood 10863 10741 98.9 122 1.1 958 8.9 2.2 5.8 0.5 0.4 Brentwood 5.0 7.7 9.5 Brookfield 14880 14593 98.1 287 1.9 647 4.4 4.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 Brookfield 1.0 1.3 1.4 Candia 19557 19340 98.9 217 1.1 1035 5.4 4.2 0.4 0.7 0.0 Candia 2.7 4.1 4.8 Chester 16718 16618 99.4 100 0.6 1205 7.3 3.4 2.3 1.5 0.0 Chester 2.5 4.3 5.1 Danville 7569 7439 98.3 131 1.7 98 1.3 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 Danville 3.5 6.0 7.2 Deerfield 33348 32584 97.7 764 2.3 2161 6.6 4.0 1.8 0.9 0.0 Deerfield 1.5 2.4 3.0 Derry 23226 22680 97.7 545 2.3 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Derry 8.0 11.3 13.1 Dover 18592 17100 92.0 1492 8.0 2139 12.5 3.0 3.3 4.7 1.5 Dover 11.0 15.4 18.5 Durham 15852 14305 90.2 1548 9.8 1377 9.6 1.5 1.7 4.9 1.5 Durham 4.7 7.2 7.7 East Kingston 6381 6318 99.0 63 1.0 416 6.6 2.4 2.1 1.2 0.8 East Kingston 3.5 5.3 7.0 Epping 16776 16470 98.2 306 1.8 1980 12.0 4.0 5.3 2.4 0.3 Epping 4.0 6.5 7.8 Exeter 12813 12553 98.0 260 2.0 1927 15.3 6.3 2.6 4.2 2.4 Exeter 7.5 11.0 12.4 Farmington 23640 23218 98.2 422 1.8 1548 6.7 2.5 2.0 1.3 0.8 Farmington 3.0 4.2 4.7 Fremont 11142 11035 99.0 108 1.0 1127 10.2 5.3 1.6 2.1 1.2 Fremont 3.0 4.9 5.9 Greenland 8524 6781 79.5 1743 20.5 670 9.9 2.0 5.6 1.6 0.8 Greenland 6.7 10.5 12.5 Hampstead 9014 8543 94.8 471 5.2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hampstead 7.5 11.4 13.7 Hampton 9073 8287 91.3 786 8.7 2242 27.1 21.7 2.4 1.5 1.5 Hampton 14.2 19.4 20.7 Hampton Falls 8078 7719 95.6 359 4.4 1752 22.7 16.9 4.4 1.3 0.1 Hampton Falls 4.4 6.9 9.1 Kensington 7668 7635 99.6 32 0.4 815 10.7 6.1 0.8 3.7 0.1 Kensington 3.2 5.0 6.2 Kingston 13450 12494 92.9 957 7.1 458 3.7 2.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 Kingston 5.2 8.2 9.7 Lee 12927 12686 98.1 241 1.9 1541 12.1 5.7 2.9 3.0 0.5 Lee 3.7 5.8 6.6 Madbury 7799 7400 94.9 400 5.1 745 10.1 3.7 5.0 1.2 0.1 Madbury 3.4 5.3 5.3 Middleton 11843 11559 97.6 284 2.4 843 7.3 6.2 0.9 0.0 0.2 Middleton 1.8 2.5 3.0 Milton 21936 21089 96.1 847 3.9 1759 8.3 6.0 0.8 1.3 0.2 Milton 2.8 4.0 4.7 New Castle 1348 506 37.6 841 62.4 269 53.2 5.7 0.0 0.0 47.5 New Castle 21.4 30.6 33.8 New Durham 28054 26345 93.9 1709 6.1 703 2.7 2.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 New Durham 1.7 2.4 2.8 Newfields 4647 4541 97.7 106 2.3 596 13.1 8.8 0.4 3.3 0.6 Newfields 3.1 5.5 6.8 Newington 7917 5216 65.9 2700 34.1 364 7.0 0.9 0.8 2.2 3.1 Newington 13.2 18.0 20.2 Newmarket 9080 8038 88.5 1043 11.5 934 11.6 3.2 2.9 4.1 1.3 Newmarket 6.0 8.8 10.2 North Hampton 8923 8862 99.3 61 0.7 1028 11.6 5.9 3.3 1.7 0.6 North Hampton 7.3 10.8 12.4 Northwood 19357 17974 92.9 1383 7.1 612 3.4 2.3 0.9 0.2 0.1 Northwood 2.4 3.4 4.0 Nottingham 30997 29882 96.4 1115 3.6 2928 9.8 6.7 2.6 0.2 0.3 Nottingham 1.5 2.3 2.8 Pittsfield 15559 15190 97.6 369 2.4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pittsfield 2.8 3.7 4.6 Portsmouth 10763 10002 92.9 761 7.1 858 8.6 3.4 0.4 0.7 4.0 Portsmouth 21.3 27.3 30.5 Raymond 18944 18459 97.4 485 2.6 2188 11.9 3.4 3.4 4.4 0.7 Raymond 5.3 8.0 9.3 Rochester 29081 28321 97.4 759 2.6 3012 10.6 2.4 2.1 4.1 2.0 Rochester 8.5 11.7 13.9 Rollinsford 4843 4682 96.7 161 3.3 582 12.4 3.1 3.0 3.4 3.0 Rollinsford 5.7 8.1 9.3 Rye 8406 7998 95.1 408 4.9 1165 14.6 9.0 1.7 2.5 1.4 Rye 7.3 11.0 12.8 Sandown 9232 8888 96.3 343 3.7 599 6.7 4.2 1.7 0.8 0.0 Sandown 3.8 6.1 7.9 Seabrook 6161 5664 91.9 497 8.1 1697 30.0 24.3 1.5 1.8 2.3 Seabrook 14.2 21.3 27.2 Somersworth 6398 6219 97.2 179 2.8 569 9.1 3.1 1.3 2.4 2.4 Somersworth 12.3 16.4 20.2 South Hampton 5147 5044 98.0 102 2.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 South Hampton 2.4 3.8 4.8 Strafford 32779 31151 95.0 1628 5.0 1445 4.6 4.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 Strafford 1.4 2.0 2.3 Stratham 9902 9674 97.7 228 2.3 889 9.2 4.5 2.4 2.0 0.2 Stratham 6.5 10.1 12.9 Wakefield 28717 25264 88.0 3453 12.0 948 3.8 2.2 0.8 0.6 0.2 Wakefield 3.5 4.8 5.6 Wolfeboro 37406 30693 82.1 6713 17.9 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wolfeboro 2.8 4.2 4.6 Total 759673 708144 93.2 51529 6.8 52037 7.3 3.9 1.6 1.3 0.6 Total 4.4 6.4 7.5 Townwide Impervious Surface Coverage Land Area 300' Buffer Area Percent of Town Buffer Acreage Categorized as: Town Name Total Acres Acres % of Town Acres % of Town Acres % of Town Intact Mostly Intact Somewhat Modified Altered Town Name Acres % of Town % of Land Area Alton 53231 40629 76.3 12602 23.7 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Alton 3766 7.1 9.3 Barrington 31117 29719 95.5 1399 4.5 1580 5.3 4.2 0.8 0.3 0.0 Barrington 2667 8.6 9.0 Brentwood 10863 10741 98.9 122 1.1 481 4.5 2.2 2.1 0.0 0.1 Brentwood 1387 12.8 12.9 Brookfield 14880 14593 98.1 287 1.9 323 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Brookfield 1817 12.2 12.5 Candia 19557 19340 98.9 217 1.1 489 2.5 2.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 Candia 2008 10.3 10.4 Chester 16718 16618 99.4 100 0.6 579 3.5 2.4 0.9 0.2 0.0 Chester 1312 7.8 7.9 Danville 7569 7439 98.3 131 1.7 51 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 Danville 540 7.1 7.3 Deerfield 33348 32584 97.7 764 2.3 1038 3.2 2.5 0.5 0.2 0.0 Deerfield 5582 16.7 17.1 Derry 23226 22680 97.7 545 2.3 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Derry 1118 4.8 4.9 Dover 18592 17100 92.0 1492 8.0 1086 6.3 2.3 2.0 1.3 0.7 Dover 1529 8.2 8.9 Durham 15852 14305 90.2 1548 9.8 690 4.8 1.2 1.7 1.5 0.4 Durham 4321 27.3 30.2 East Kingston 6381 6318 99.0 63 1.0 209 3.3 2.3 0.7 0.4 0.0 East Kingston 670 10.5 10.6 Epping 16776 16470 98.2 306 1.8 1011 6.1 3.7 1.8 0.6 0.0 Epping 1271 7.6 7.7 Exeter 12813 12553 98.0 260 2.0 931 7.4 3.7 1.8 1.2 0.6 Exeter 3496 27.3 27.8 Farmington 23640 23218 98.2 422 1.8 773 3.3 1.6 1.1 0.3 0.3 Farmington 1242 5.3 5.3 Fremont 11142 11035 99.0 108 1.0 565 5.1 2.2 1.7 1.0 0.2 Fremont 181 1.6 1.6 Greenland 8524 6781 79.5 1743 20.5 329 4.9 2.1 2.2 0.2 0.3 Greenland 893 10.5 13.2 Hampstead 9014 8543 94.8 471 5.2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hampstead 1506 16.7 17.6 Hampton 9073 8287 91.3 786 8.7 966 11.7 9.8 0.7 0.7 0.4 Hampton 408 4.5 4.9 Hampton Falls 8078 7719 95.6 359 4.4 774 10.0 8.9 1.0 0.2 0.0 Hampton Falls 633 7.8 8.2 Kensington 7668 7635 99.6 32 0.4 370 4.9 3.2 0.7 0.7 0.2 Kensington 1549 20.2 20.3 Kingston 13450 12494 92.9 957 7.1 224 1.8 1.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 Kingston 1376 10.2 11.0 Lee 12927 12686 98.1 241 1.9 768 6.1 3.3 1.6 1.2 0.0 Lee 2299 17.8 18.1 Madbury 7799 7400 94.9 400 5.1 387 5.2 3.2 1.9 0.0 0.0 Madbury 1328 17.0 17.9 Middleton 11843 11559 97.6 284 2.4 407 3.5 3.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 Middleton 488 4.1 4.2 Milton 21936 21089 96.1 847 3.9 853 4.0 3.0 0.6 0.4 0.0 Milton 2553 11.6 12.1 New Castle 1348 506 37.6 841 62.4 145 28.7 3.3 0.0 0.0 25.3 New Castle 92 6.8 18.1 New Durham 28054 26345 93.9 1709 6.1 323 1.2 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 New Durham 1751 6.2 6.6 Newfields 4647 4541 97.7 106 2.3 293 6.5 4.4 1.4 0.4 0.3 Newfields 753 16.2 16.6 Newington 7917 5216 65.9 2700 34.1 178 3.4 0.4 0.5 1.3 1.1 Newington 1307 16.5 25.1 Newmarket 9080 8038 88.5 1043 11.5 458 5.7 2.8 1.2 1.1 0.7 Newmarket 1331 14.7 16.6 North Hampton 8923 8862 99.3 61 0.7 490 5.5 3.9 1.3 0.1 0.2 North Hampton 709 8.0 8.0 Northwood 19357 17974 92.9 1383 7.1 285 1.6 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 Northwood 2381 12.3 13.2 Nottingham 30997 29882 96.4 1115 3.6 1409 4.7 4.1 0.5 0.0 0.1 Nottingham 5860 18.9 19.6 Pittsfield 15559 15190 97.6 369 2.4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pittsfield 728 4.7 4.8 Portsmouth 10763 10002 92.9 761 7.1 431 4.3 1.8 0.2 0.5 1.9 Portsmouth 1099 10.2 11.0 Raymond 18944 18459 97.4 485 2.6 1092 5.9 2.6 2.3 0.9 0.1 Raymond 972 5.1 5.3 Rochester 29081 28321 97.4 759 2.6 1569 5.5 1.8 1.8 1.3 0.5 Rochester 431 1.5 1.5 Rollinsford 4843 4682 96.7 161 3.3 296 6.3 3.2 0.0 2.8 0.3 Rollinsford 409 8.4 8.7 Rye 8406 7998 95.1 408 4.9 554 6.9 4.7 1.1 0.5 0.7 Rye 1488 17.7 18.6 Sandown 9232 8888 96.3 343 3.7 290 3.3 2.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Sandown 470 5.1 5.3 Seabrook 6161 5664 91.9 497 8.1 721 12.7 10.4 0.5 1.4 0.4 Seabrook 447 7.3 7.9 Somersworth 6398 6219 97.2 179 2.8 280 4.5 2.1 0.4 1.3 0.8 Somersworth 221 3.5 3.6 South Hampton 5147 5044 98.0 102 2.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 South Hampton 284 5.5 5.6 Strafford 32779 31151 95.0 1628 5.0 691 2.2 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Strafford 5261 16.1 16.9 Stratham 9902 9674 97.7 228 2.3 439 4.5 3.1 0.9 0.4 0.1 Stratham 1023 10.3 10.6 Wakefield 28717 25264 88.0 3453 12.0 451 1.8 1.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 Wakefield 390 1.4 1.5 Wolfeboro 37406 30693 82.1 6713 17.9 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wolfeboro 2248 6.0 7.3 Total 759673 708144 93.2 51529 6.8 25279 3.6 2.3 0.7 0.4 0.2 Total 75596 10.0 10.7 Townwide Conservation Lands Land Area 150' Buffer Area Percent of Town Buffer Acreage Categorized as: Surface Water Area 0 1 0.5 Mi Scale = 1:24,000 Strafford Rockingham Massachusetts Massachusetts Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space Stream Buffer Characterization Intact Mostly Intact Somewhat Modified Altered Percent Impervious by 300-ft Buffer Segment Less Than 10% Greater Than 10% Conservation Lands Level 1, 2, or 2A

Upload: others

Post on 21-Feb-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Report

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Town of Hampton Falls, NH

This Project was funded by a grant from the New Hampshire Estuaries Project, as authorized by the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency pursuant to Section 320 of the Clean Water Act.

;

;

;

;

S T R E A M B U F F E R C H A R A C T E R I Z A T I O N S T U D Y

Coos

Grafton Carroll

Merrimack

Cheshire Hillsborough

SullivanBelknap

70°56'15"W

70°56'15"W

70°52'30"W

70°52'30"W

70°48'45"W

70°48'45"W

42°5

2'30"N

42°5

2'30"N

42°5

6'15"N

42°5

6'15"N

43°0

'0"N

43°0

'0"N

S T R E A M B U F F E R C H A R A C T E R I Z A T I O N S T U D Y

Complex Systems Research CenterInstitute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and SpaceUniversity of New Hampshire, DurhamJune, 2006

- Stream Buffers were created from 1:24,000-scaleNew Hampshire National Hydrography Dataset (NHNHD) stream centerlines (2005)- Impervious Surface data was generated from Landsat 5 TM (30m resolution) imagery (1990, 2000, 2005)- Land Use data was created from 1998 USGSDigital Orthophotoquads- Conservation Lands were based on April, 2006 version of GRANIT data layer

The Complex Systems Research Center at the University of New Hampshire conducted a characterization of 2nd order and higher streams within the Piscataqua/Coastal Basin of coastal New Hampshire. Existing GIS and remote sensing data were used to map a suite of anthropogenic factors, including land use, impervious surface coverage, and transportation infrastructure, within standard buffers around each stream segment. These factors were then analyzed to produce a categorical indicator representing the status of each stream. Processing began using the GRANIT hydrography data to identify perennial streams/rivers of order 2 or higher. Each stream segment was buffered by 150’ to support water quality analyses and by 300’ to support habitat analyses, and the buffers were then combined with land use data derived from 1998 USGS Digital Orthophotoquads (DOQs). Finally, the buffer/land use composites were categorized

based on the degree to which each buffer was impacted by human activity. Specifically, the buffer categories reflect the percent of land area within each buffer mapped as either developed, transportation, or agriculture, and include: Category Decision Rule Intact <10% impacted Mostly Intact 10-25% impacted Somewhat Modified 25-50% impacted Altered >50% impacted The buffer characterizations are depicted on the map and summarized by town in the tables below. The map also displays the 300’ buffers based on the degree of imperviousness in 2005, and the townwide conservation lands data. Impervious surface coverage by town for 1990, 2000, and 2005, as well as conservation lands acreage by town, are also reported.

Town of Hampton Falls, NH

Ê

Project Description:

Map Notes:

150-ft Buffer Stream Characterization Data Summary

300-ft Buffer Stream Characterization Data Summary

For more information on this or other GRANIT products, please visit http://www.granit.sr.unh.edu

1. Stream reaches were identified, attributed, and buffered based on their extent from confluence to confluence. Rules were developed to guide the determination of segments in specific situations, e.g. where confluences existed on one river bank but not on the opposing bank. These procedures occasionally yielded very short stream segments and therefore relatively small buffers.

2. Because only 2nd order and higher perennial streams were analyzed,

some discontinuities exist in the input data set and thus in th e buffers. 3. At points of confluence and in other locations where buffers overlapped,

the most impacted category was assigned to the overlap area. 4. Data was processed for the Piscataqua/Coastal Basin , which includes all

or part of 48 municipalities. Six of these towns – Alton, Derry, Hampstead, Pittsfield, South Hampton, and Wolfeboro - were not included in the printed map set as they have no streams that extend into the Watershed.

5. Only 300’ buffers were analyzed with respect to impervious surface data

due to the 30-meter resolution of the source satellite imagery. 6. Conservation lands shown on the map and summarized in the table

include only those classified as permanently protected (Level 1, 2, or 2A) in the GRANIT database.

Townwide Conservation Lands Data Summary

Townwide Impervious SurfaceData Summary

Data Sources:

Map by:

Map Location:

Surface Water Area

Town Name Total Acres Acres% of Town Acres

% of Town Acres

% of Town Intact Mostly Intact

Somewhat Modified Altered Town Name

% of Land Area, 1990

% of Land Area, 2000

% of Land Area, 2005

Alton 53231 40629 76.3 12602 23.7 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Alton 2.1 3.0 3.5Barrington 31117 29719 95.5 1399 4.5 3210 10.8 7.2 2.6 0.8 0.1 Barrington 2.6 4.0 4.7Brentwood 10863 10741 98.9 122 1.1 958 8.9 2.2 5.8 0.5 0.4 Brentwood 5.0 7.7 9.5Brookfield 14880 14593 98.1 287 1.9 647 4.4 4.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 Brookfield 1.0 1.3 1.4Candia 19557 19340 98.9 217 1.1 1035 5.4 4.2 0.4 0.7 0.0 Candia 2.7 4.1 4.8Chester 16718 16618 99.4 100 0.6 1205 7.3 3.4 2.3 1.5 0.0 Chester 2.5 4.3 5.1Danville 7569 7439 98.3 131 1.7 98 1.3 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 Danville 3.5 6.0 7.2Deerfield 33348 32584 97.7 764 2.3 2161 6.6 4.0 1.8 0.9 0.0 Deerfield 1.5 2.4 3.0Derry 23226 22680 97.7 545 2.3 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Derry 8.0 11.3 13.1Dover 18592 17100 92.0 1492 8.0 2139 12.5 3.0 3.3 4.7 1.5 Dover 11.0 15.4 18.5Durham 15852 14305 90.2 1548 9.8 1377 9.6 1.5 1.7 4.9 1.5 Durham 4.7 7.2 7.7East Kingston 6381 6318 99.0 63 1.0 416 6.6 2.4 2.1 1.2 0.8 East Kingston 3.5 5.3 7.0Epping 16776 16470 98.2 306 1.8 1980 12.0 4.0 5.3 2.4 0.3 Epping 4.0 6.5 7.8Exeter 12813 12553 98.0 260 2.0 1927 15.3 6.3 2.6 4.2 2.4 Exeter 7.5 11.0 12.4Farmington 23640 23218 98.2 422 1.8 1548 6.7 2.5 2.0 1.3 0.8 Farmington 3.0 4.2 4.7Fremont 11142 11035 99.0 108 1.0 1127 10.2 5.3 1.6 2.1 1.2 Fremont 3.0 4.9 5.9Greenland 8524 6781 79.5 1743 20.5 670 9.9 2.0 5.6 1.6 0.8 Greenland 6.7 10.5 12.5Hampstead 9014 8543 94.8 471 5.2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hampstead 7.5 11.4 13.7Hampton 9073 8287 91.3 786 8.7 2242 27.1 21.7 2.4 1.5 1.5 Hampton 14.2 19.4 20.7Hampton Falls 8078 7719 95.6 359 4.4 1752 22.7 16.9 4.4 1.3 0.1 Hampton Falls 4.4 6.9 9.1Kensington 7668 7635 99.6 32 0.4 815 10.7 6.1 0.8 3.7 0.1 Kensington 3.2 5.0 6.2Kingston 13450 12494 92.9 957 7.1 458 3.7 2.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 Kingston 5.2 8.2 9.7Lee 12927 12686 98.1 241 1.9 1541 12.1 5.7 2.9 3.0 0.5 Lee 3.7 5.8 6.6Madbury 7799 7400 94.9 400 5.1 745 10.1 3.7 5.0 1.2 0.1 Madbury 3.4 5.3 5.3Middleton 11843 11559 97.6 284 2.4 843 7.3 6.2 0.9 0.0 0.2 Middleton 1.8 2.5 3.0Milton 21936 21089 96.1 847 3.9 1759 8.3 6.0 0.8 1.3 0.2 Milton 2.8 4.0 4.7New Castle 1348 506 37.6 841 62.4 269 53.2 5.7 0.0 0.0 47.5 New Castle 21.4 30.6 33.8New Durham 28054 26345 93.9 1709 6.1 703 2.7 2.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 New Durham 1.7 2.4 2.8Newfields 4647 4541 97.7 106 2.3 596 13.1 8.8 0.4 3.3 0.6 Newfields 3.1 5.5 6.8Newington 7917 5216 65.9 2700 34.1 364 7.0 0.9 0.8 2.2 3.1 Newington 13.2 18.0 20.2Newmarket 9080 8038 88.5 1043 11.5 934 11.6 3.2 2.9 4.1 1.3 Newmarket 6.0 8.8 10.2North Hampton 8923 8862 99.3 61 0.7 1028 11.6 5.9 3.3 1.7 0.6 North Hampton 7.3 10.8 12.4Northwood 19357 17974 92.9 1383 7.1 612 3.4 2.3 0.9 0.2 0.1 Northwood 2.4 3.4 4.0Nottingham 30997 29882 96.4 1115 3.6 2928 9.8 6.7 2.6 0.2 0.3 Nottingham 1.5 2.3 2.8Pittsfield 15559 15190 97.6 369 2.4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pittsfield 2.8 3.7 4.6Portsmouth 10763 10002 92.9 761 7.1 858 8.6 3.4 0.4 0.7 4.0 Portsmouth 21.3 27.3 30.5Raymond 18944 18459 97.4 485 2.6 2188 11.9 3.4 3.4 4.4 0.7 Raymond 5.3 8.0 9.3Rochester 29081 28321 97.4 759 2.6 3012 10.6 2.4 2.1 4.1 2.0 Rochester 8.5 11.7 13.9Rollinsford 4843 4682 96.7 161 3.3 582 12.4 3.1 3.0 3.4 3.0 Rollinsford 5.7 8.1 9.3Rye 8406 7998 95.1 408 4.9 1165 14.6 9.0 1.7 2.5 1.4 Rye 7.3 11.0 12.8Sandown 9232 8888 96.3 343 3.7 599 6.7 4.2 1.7 0.8 0.0 Sandown 3.8 6.1 7.9Seabrook 6161 5664 91.9 497 8.1 1697 30.0 24.3 1.5 1.8 2.3 Seabrook 14.2 21.3 27.2Somersworth 6398 6219 97.2 179 2.8 569 9.1 3.1 1.3 2.4 2.4 Somersworth 12.3 16.4 20.2South Hampton 5147 5044 98.0 102 2.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 South Hampton 2.4 3.8 4.8Strafford 32779 31151 95.0 1628 5.0 1445 4.6 4.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 Strafford 1.4 2.0 2.3Stratham 9902 9674 97.7 228 2.3 889 9.2 4.5 2.4 2.0 0.2 Stratham 6.5 10.1 12.9Wakefield 28717 25264 88.0 3453 12.0 948 3.8 2.2 0.8 0.6 0.2 Wakefield 3.5 4.8 5.6Wolfeboro 37406 30693 82.1 6713 17.9 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wolfeboro 2.8 4.2 4.6

Total 759673 708144 93.2 51529 6.8 52037 7.3 3.9 1.6 1.3 0.6 Total 4.4 6.4 7.5

Townwide Impervious Surface CoverageLand Area 300' Buffer Area Percent of Town Buffer Acreage Categorized as:

Town Name Total Acres Acres% of Town Acres

% of Town Acres

% of Town Intact Mostly Intact

Somewhat Modified Altered Town Name Acres % of Town

% of Land Area

Alton 53231 40629 76.3 12602 23.7 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Alton 3766 7.1 9.3Barrington 31117 29719 95.5 1399 4.5 1580 5.3 4.2 0.8 0.3 0.0 Barrington 2667 8.6 9.0Brentwood 10863 10741 98.9 122 1.1 481 4.5 2.2 2.1 0.0 0.1 Brentwood 1387 12.8 12.9Brookfield 14880 14593 98.1 287 1.9 323 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Brookfield 1817 12.2 12.5Candia 19557 19340 98.9 217 1.1 489 2.5 2.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 Candia 2008 10.3 10.4Chester 16718 16618 99.4 100 0.6 579 3.5 2.4 0.9 0.2 0.0 Chester 1312 7.8 7.9Danville 7569 7439 98.3 131 1.7 51 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 Danville 540 7.1 7.3Deerfield 33348 32584 97.7 764 2.3 1038 3.2 2.5 0.5 0.2 0.0 Deerfield 5582 16.7 17.1Derry 23226 22680 97.7 545 2.3 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Derry 1118 4.8 4.9Dover 18592 17100 92.0 1492 8.0 1086 6.3 2.3 2.0 1.3 0.7 Dover 1529 8.2 8.9Durham 15852 14305 90.2 1548 9.8 690 4.8 1.2 1.7 1.5 0.4 Durham 4321 27.3 30.2East Kingston 6381 6318 99.0 63 1.0 209 3.3 2.3 0.7 0.4 0.0 East Kingston 670 10.5 10.6Epping 16776 16470 98.2 306 1.8 1011 6.1 3.7 1.8 0.6 0.0 Epping 1271 7.6 7.7Exeter 12813 12553 98.0 260 2.0 931 7.4 3.7 1.8 1.2 0.6 Exeter 3496 27.3 27.8Farmington 23640 23218 98.2 422 1.8 773 3.3 1.6 1.1 0.3 0.3 Farmington 1242 5.3 5.3Fremont 11142 11035 99.0 108 1.0 565 5.1 2.2 1.7 1.0 0.2 Fremont 181 1.6 1.6Greenland 8524 6781 79.5 1743 20.5 329 4.9 2.1 2.2 0.2 0.3 Greenland 893 10.5 13.2Hampstead 9014 8543 94.8 471 5.2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hampstead 1506 16.7 17.6Hampton 9073 8287 91.3 786 8.7 966 11.7 9.8 0.7 0.7 0.4 Hampton 408 4.5 4.9Hampton Falls 8078 7719 95.6 359 4.4 774 10.0 8.9 1.0 0.2 0.0 Hampton Falls 633 7.8 8.2Kensington 7668 7635 99.6 32 0.4 370 4.9 3.2 0.7 0.7 0.2 Kensington 1549 20.2 20.3Kingston 13450 12494 92.9 957 7.1 224 1.8 1.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 Kingston 1376 10.2 11.0Lee 12927 12686 98.1 241 1.9 768 6.1 3.3 1.6 1.2 0.0 Lee 2299 17.8 18.1Madbury 7799 7400 94.9 400 5.1 387 5.2 3.2 1.9 0.0 0.0 Madbury 1328 17.0 17.9Middleton 11843 11559 97.6 284 2.4 407 3.5 3.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 Middleton 488 4.1 4.2Milton 21936 21089 96.1 847 3.9 853 4.0 3.0 0.6 0.4 0.0 Milton 2553 11.6 12.1New Castle 1348 506 37.6 841 62.4 145 28.7 3.3 0.0 0.0 25.3 New Castle 92 6.8 18.1New Durham 28054 26345 93.9 1709 6.1 323 1.2 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 New Durham 1751 6.2 6.6Newfields 4647 4541 97.7 106 2.3 293 6.5 4.4 1.4 0.4 0.3 Newfields 753 16.2 16.6Newington 7917 5216 65.9 2700 34.1 178 3.4 0.4 0.5 1.3 1.1 Newington 1307 16.5 25.1Newmarket 9080 8038 88.5 1043 11.5 458 5.7 2.8 1.2 1.1 0.7 Newmarket 1331 14.7 16.6North Hampton 8923 8862 99.3 61 0.7 490 5.5 3.9 1.3 0.1 0.2 North Hampton 709 8.0 8.0Northwood 19357 17974 92.9 1383 7.1 285 1.6 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 Northwood 2381 12.3 13.2Nottingham 30997 29882 96.4 1115 3.6 1409 4.7 4.1 0.5 0.0 0.1 Nottingham 5860 18.9 19.6Pittsfield 15559 15190 97.6 369 2.4 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pittsfield 728 4.7 4.8Portsmouth 10763 10002 92.9 761 7.1 431 4.3 1.8 0.2 0.5 1.9 Portsmouth 1099 10.2 11.0Raymond 18944 18459 97.4 485 2.6 1092 5.9 2.6 2.3 0.9 0.1 Raymond 972 5.1 5.3Rochester 29081 28321 97.4 759 2.6 1569 5.5 1.8 1.8 1.3 0.5 Rochester 431 1.5 1.5Rollinsford 4843 4682 96.7 161 3.3 296 6.3 3.2 0.0 2.8 0.3 Rollinsford 409 8.4 8.7Rye 8406 7998 95.1 408 4.9 554 6.9 4.7 1.1 0.5 0.7 Rye 1488 17.7 18.6Sandown 9232 8888 96.3 343 3.7 290 3.3 2.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Sandown 470 5.1 5.3Seabrook 6161 5664 91.9 497 8.1 721 12.7 10.4 0.5 1.4 0.4 Seabrook 447 7.3 7.9Somersworth 6398 6219 97.2 179 2.8 280 4.5 2.1 0.4 1.3 0.8 Somersworth 221 3.5 3.6South Hampton 5147 5044 98.0 102 2.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 South Hampton 284 5.5 5.6Strafford 32779 31151 95.0 1628 5.0 691 2.2 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Strafford 5261 16.1 16.9Stratham 9902 9674 97.7 228 2.3 439 4.5 3.1 0.9 0.4 0.1 Stratham 1023 10.3 10.6Wakefield 28717 25264 88.0 3453 12.0 451 1.8 1.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 Wakefield 390 1.4 1.5Wolfeboro 37406 30693 82.1 6713 17.9 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wolfeboro 2248 6.0 7.3

Total 759673 708144 93.2 51529 6.8 25279 3.6 2.3 0.7 0.4 0.2 Total 75596 10.0 10.7

Townwide Conservation LandsLand Area 150' Buffer Area Percent of Town Buffer Acreage Categorized as:Surface Water Area

0 10.5Mi

Scale = 1:24,000

Strafford

Rockingham

MassachusettsMassachusetts

Institute for the Study ofEarth, Oceans, and Space

Stream BufferCharacterization

IntactMostly IntactSomewhat ModifiedAltered

Percent Impervious by300-ft Buffer Segment

Less Than 10%Greater Than 10%

Conservation LandsLevel 1, 2, or 2A

SAINT PIUS V Cannon Falls SAINT JOSEPH SAINT MARY SAINT … · 2016-06-17 · SAINT PIUS V Cannon Falls SAINT JOSEPH Miesville SAINT MARY New Trier SAINT MATHIAS Hampton SAINT JOHN

Falls in the Nursing Home - Semantic Scholar · We review the problem of falls in the nursing home, focusing on identifiable causes, ... Rubenstein et al, 1990 (14) NH and BC

La Quinta Inn & Suites and The Falls Center Manchester, NH

Restoring Natural Dunes and Protecting People: Community ... · Restoring Natural Dunes and Protecting People: Community Based Dune Restoration in Hampton and Seabrook, NH Alyson

New Hampton, NH - IHG

ANNUAL REPORTS - South Hampton NH

New Hampshire Drug Monitoring Initiative · 2020. 12. 9. · 19 - South Hampton 20 - Seabrook 21 - East Kingston 22 - Kensington 23 - Hampton Falls 24 - Hampton 25 - North Hampton

The Governor’s AcAdemy - WordPress.com€¦ · Carolyn Hoffman West Newbury, MA Konnar Johnson North Hampton, NH Brendan Lang Lynn, MA Michelle Gallipeau Ipswich, MA Alexandra Grenier

Hampton Toll Plaza, Hampton, NH, NHG910024 · 2011-03-09 · Hampton Toll Plaza site located at Interstate 95, Hampton, NH 03842 Rockingham County; Authorization # NHG910024 - Reissuance

Demo Sites Networking Day Friday March 9, 2012 Mills Falls, Meredith, NH

Impressive Equestrian Estate in Hampton Falls, NH

North Hampton, NH | 2016 Annual Report | NPDES Phase II … · monitoring conservation parcels and : Minor Site Plan and Subdivision Plans . stewardship ofconservation easements (Regulations)

New Hampton, NH - The Common Man Restaurant Spring DINERS.pdf · New Hampton, NH 752 NH Route 104 • New Hampton, NH (603) 744-0120 ... Tilton, NH 61 Laconia Road • Tilton, NH

Hampton Roads 2034 Long-Range Transportation Plan€¦ · VA OH SC ME KY IN WV TN VT NH MD MI NJ MA CT AL RI DC WI Hampton VA Roads Su˜olk Chesapeake Virginia Beach Isle of Wight

Hampton–Brownncliteracyresources.com/files/NC_HP_6-8.pdfT92a–T92d, T222a–T222b, T236a–T236d, T292b NH 1.02 Demonstrate basic comprehension of previewed vocabulary, concepts

Love the Lake!€¦ · • Mill Falls • NH Ball Bearings, Inc. • NH Electric Co-op • RE/Max Bayside • Steven J. Smith & Associates, Inc. • Worry Free Property Management

DIVISION WISE NOS. OF LOCATION & TOTAL LENGTH OF … · nh 18 nh 18 nh 143 nh 326a nh 130c nh 63 nh 63 nh 26 nh 326 nh 26 nh 16 nh 16 nh 16 nh 16 nh 16 nh 16 nh 16 nh 18 nh 49 nh

Between the - NH.gov · Michele Mccann-Corti Amy Pruett Patricia Valcich Amy Scholes Daniel Singer Amy Waterhouse . NH SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT NO. 21 HAMPTON FALLS ... funds are

Hampton Middle School - Hampton Township School District

Hampton, NH 2020 Town Warrant Articles In the Know …...Mar 03, 2020  · This document is intended to help Hampton voters understand the Warrant Articles that will appear on the

Tin Whiskers – A Long Term RoHS Reliability Problem Presented by: Robert J. Landman, President, SM IEEE H&L Instruments, North Hampton, NH Author: Section

John Gamache North Hampton School District Facilities …images.pcmac.org/SiSFiles/Schools/NH/NorthHampton/NHS/Uploads... · North Hampton School District 201 Atlantic Ave North

2010 Labor Day Car Sale Event Nelson Auto Center Fergus Falls NH

Hampton Village Community Association Spring 2012saskhvca.com/.../03/Hampton-Village-Community-AssociationSprin… · Hampton Village Community Association Spring 2012 Hampton Village

Town of Hampton - US EPAHampton Town Boards and Staff was hosted by the Hampton NROC and supported by the NH NROC and the NH Estuaries Project. Presentations on “WhyStormwater Matters”,

The Scentinel - York County Kennel Club...Portsmouth, NH 03801 5012 603-436-0231 603-539-5726 [email protected] Hampton, NH 03842-2154 603-926-6915 ©603-502-0741 139 High Street

2019 Annual Report - New Brunswick Municipal Finance ... · Grand Bay-Westfield Grand-Sault/Grand Falls Hampton Hartland Lamèque Nackawic Oromocto Quispamsis Richibucto Riverview

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGISTS 11th ASEP ... · Fairfield Inn-Wichita Falls - (940) 691-1066 Hampton Inn Wichita Falls-Sikes Senter Mall, TX – (940) 692-1999 Approximately

FALLS PREVENTION TOOLKIT - Public Health Agency Home... · NORTHERN IRELAND NURSING HOME REGIONAL COLLABORATIVE FALLS PREVENTION TOOLKIT January 2013 NH Collaborative RP/01/13/ver

Animating Occultation Data Ted Blank Hampton, NH

NEW HAMPSHIRE FISH AND GAME DEPARTMENT DEER AND …hampton falls h seabrook n hampton north hampton stratham h rye brentwood atkin son w hampstead langdon wn grantham carroll ld n

ZONING & LAND USE REGULATIONS - New Hampshire · ZONING & LAND USE REGULATIONS June 1994 ... Arnold v. Chandler (Bedford), 121 NH 130 ... Polizzo v. Hampton, 126 NH 398 (1985)

2018 NH COASTAL CLIMATE SUMMIT … Bourbeau, Hampton Resident Rayann Dionne, Hampton Conservation Planner Chris Jacobs, Hampton DPW Director 10:15 Nuisance Flooding and Pavement Impacts:

of the Bank CommissionER - New HampshireMeredith Village Savings Bank 95 Lafayette Road, Hampton Falls, NH Randolph Savings Bank 167 South River Road, Unit 1, Bedford, NH ... 100 Borthwick

LIVE MUSIC - Hotel in Hampton Beach New Hampshire...LIVE MUSIC 603.926.6762 295 Ocean Blvd. Hampton, NH 03842 ASHWORTHHOTEL.com ON THE DJ IN THE DECK LOUNGE