tp-1893.pdf

Upload: rohammed-castillo

Post on 03-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 TP-1893.pdf

    1/5

    Trans. Indian Inst. Met.

    Vol.57, No. 3, June 2004, pp. 277-281

    TP 1893

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Dissolved CO2

    in water or aqueous solution causes

    severe corrosion of pipeline steel and process

    equipments used in the extraction, production and

    transportation of oil and gas in the petroleum industry.

    Many variables are associated with the CO2

    corrosion

    process such as pH, temperature, pressure and surface

    films.1 Present study focuses on the role of CO2

    in

    both anodic and cathodic reaction for the pipeline

    steels. Significant work has been reported in this

    direction by de Waard and Milliams.1,2 However,

    very few studies have been carried out on the long

    term corrosion behaviour of pipeline steel in CO2

    environment. Typical laboratory tests carried out

    continuously for 48 hours under static condition in

    CO2

    containing solution at pH 4.5 and 5.8. The

    formation of surface films, mainly of FeCO3, and

    their influence on the corrosion rate has significant

    role in the CO2

    aqueous solutions.2,3 Iron carbonate

    (FeCO3) formation is temperature dependent and

    important in the formation of protective layers over

    the metal surface.2,4

    1.1 Theoretical Background of CO2Corrosion

    Aqueous CO2

    corrosion of carbon steel is an

    electrochemical process involving the anodic and

    cathodic evolution of hydrogen.4 The overall reaction

    is:

    Fe+CO2+H

    2O = FeCO

    3+ H

    2(1)

    The electrochemical reactions are often accompanied

    by the formation of films of solid FeCO3

    (and/or

    Fe3O

    4), which can be protective or non protective

    depending on the condition under which they are

    formed. One of the most important individual reactionis the anodic dissolution of iron:

    Fe = Fe2+ + 2e- (2)

    It is believed that the presence of CO2

    increases the

    rate of corrosion of mild steel in aqueous solution

    by increasing the rate of the hydrogen reaction. The

    presence of H2CO

    3enables hydrogen evolution at a

    higher rate even at pH greater than 5.5 Thus at a

    given pH as the partial pressure of CO2

    increases

    the solubility of CO2

    in the solution increases leading

    CORROSION BEHAVIOUR OF PIPELINE STEEL IN

    CO2 ENVIRONMENT

    G.S. Das and A.S. KhannaCorrosion Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Mumbai-400076

    E-mail : [email protected]

    (Received 5 October 2003 ; in revised form 7 April 2004)

    ABSTRACT

    The influence of temperature (30-120oC) on the corrosion behavior of low carbon pipeline steels in the CO2

    saturated solutions in the closed autoclave system has been studied. At lower temperatures, the surface films

    have an open porous structure and hence the FeCO3

    film formed dissolved continuously in the CO2

    saturated

    solution. Between 60 to 90oC, the FeCO3 film accumulated more in the outer part, which is more porous, less

    dense and nonprotective in nature and hence the corrosion rates of samples increase with temperature.

    Incontrast, above 90oC, a dense protective FeCO3 film is formed and the corrosion rate decreases significantly

    at 120oC.

  • 7/29/2019 TP-1893.pdf

    2/5

    278

    TRANS. INDIAN INST. MET., VOL. 57, NO. 3, JUNE 2004

    to a higher corrosion rate than would be found in a

    solution of a strong acid.6

    2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

    The materials used for the experiment were supplied

    by ONGC Panvel and Juhu Helibase (Pipeline Group)

    Bombay, India. The chemical composition of alloys,

    as obtained by inductively coupled plasma and atomic

    emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) technique, are

    shown in Table 1.

    The as received materials were cut into the

    rectangular specimens of dimension 15X12X3.5 mm

    and 12X10X2 mm with a hole of 1.5 mm diameter

    drilled near the top edge of each sample to facilitate

    suspension of the sample inside of an autoclave of

    the capacity of 2.2 liters. All faces of the samples

    were initially coarse ground on SiC belt grinder

    machine then consequently machine polished in the

    successive grades of emery papers up to 600 grit.

    The polished samples were washed and subsequently

    cleaned in acetone. Experiments were carried out at

    four temperatures (30, 60, 90 and 120oC) and at

    pressures ranging from 50 to 300 PSI under static

    condition in a multiphase dynamic loop machine.

    Initial weight of the samples were measured and

    then kept inside of the autoclave for 48 hours

    continuous test. Initially the vessel was deaerated by

    using a vacuum pump and purging argon continuously

    for 1-2 hour for removing the oxygen impurity. Then

    deaerated solution was poured into the vessel. Thetemperature was raised to the testing condition then

    Fig. 1 : Corrosion rate of API grade steels at 30oC Fig. 2 : Corrosion rate of API grade steels at 60oC

    Fig. 3 : Corrosion rate of API grade steels at 90oC Fig. 4 : Corrosion rate of API grade steels at 120oC

  • 7/29/2019 TP-1893.pdf

    3/5

    279

    DAS AND KHANNA : CORROSION BEHAVIOUR OF PIPELINE STEEL IN CO2

    ENVIRONMENT

    Table 1CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE ALLOYS USED (IN WT%)

    GRADE C Mn Si S P Cr Mo

    API X-52 0.20 1.23 0.47 0.12 0.17 0.065 -

    API X-56 0.16 1.19 0.19 0.22 0.29 0.047 -

    L-80 0.22 1.38 0.22 0.21 0.28 0.013 -

    API X-60 0.10 0.74 0.014 0.20 0.26 0.067 0.06

    Fig. 5 : ESEM micrographs showing surface morphology of (a) API X-52, (b) API X-56 exposed at 90oC and 300 PSI and

    (c) API X-52 and (d) API X-56 exposed at 120oC and 300 PSI

    CO2

    and argon were charged to maintain the pressure

    and observed from the digital display unit (DDU).

    Each experiment was conducted using the same

    procedures for a total period of 48 hours continuouslywith four samples and corrosion rates were measured

    in mils per year (mpy). In order to analyze corrosion

    products X-ray diffraction (XRD) and environmental

    scanning electron microscope (ESEM) were used in

    this study.

    3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Corrosion rates of samples as a function of pressure

    at different temperatures are shown in Figs. 1 to 4.

  • 7/29/2019 TP-1893.pdf

    4/5

    280

    TRANS. INDIAN INST. MET., VOL. 57, NO. 3, JUNE 2004

    At low temperature, corrosion rate of samples slowly

    increases due to continuous dissolution of Fe2+ion

    in the solution as a result of formation of porous

    FeCO3, which is not protective in nature, however

    as the temperature increases from 30 to 60oC, the

    FeCO3

    film becomes less porous, more adherent to

    the metal surface and protective in nature and hence

    the corrosion rate decreases. Beyond 60oC, the

    corrosion rate increases and it is higher at 90 0C due

    to accumulation of more porous inner FeCO3

    film

    on the metal surface which initiates formation of

    cracks and finally spallation of FeCO3

    film. The

    corrosion rates of all the samples are higher at 90oC

    as shown in Fig.3. In all the cases, corrosion rate

    of the pipeline steel increases as the partial pressureof CO

    2increases due to local depletion of HCO

    3-,

    which is favoring the cathodic reaction. Crolet and

    co-workers6 have reported that FeCO3

    can precipitate

    on the steel surface with higher rate of dissolution

    of Fe2+ ion and the additional HCO3- anions produced

    by the cathodic reduction of CO2

    It has been also

    reported that FeCO3

    precipitation is temperature

    dependent and for its precipitation super saturation

    with the Fe2+ ion is required which is 5-10 times

    higher than the thermodynamically calculated values

    of solubility.7-9 The surface morphology of API X-

    52 and API X-56 as shown in Fig. 5 indicates

    cracking and spallation of FeCO3

    filmat 90oC and

    300 PSI. However, at 120oC and 300 PSI, the FeCO3

    film is showing protective nature and good adherence

    on the metal surface as shown in Fig. 6. Similarly

    API X-60 and L-80 grade steels at 90oC and 300

    PSI indicate crack formation and less adherence of

    the protective film with the base metal and thus

    corrosion rates are higher, but at higher temperaturethe oxide layer is more protective in nature and

    adheres on the metal surface with exception of L-80

    grade steel. The phases formed on the metal surface

    were obtained by XRD analysis as shown in Fig.7

    indicates the formation of FeCO3,

    Fe3O

    4, and Fe

    2O

    3

    Fig. 6 : ESEM micrographs showing surface morphology of (a) API X-60 (b) L-80 exposed at 90oC and 300 PSI and (c)

    API X-60 and (d) L-80 exposed at 120oC and 300 PSI

  • 7/29/2019 TP-1893.pdf

    5/5

    281

    DAS AND KHANNA : CORROSION BEHAVIOUR OF PIPELINE STEEL IN CO2

    ENVIRONMENT

    4. CONCLUSIONS

    1. At lower temperature the FeCO3 film getsdissolved continuously and hence the corrosion

    rate somewhat increases but at higher

    temperature the dense protective layer of FeCO3

    film formed on the metal surface which is

    adherent and more protective in nature.

    2. The Corrosion behaviour of line pipe steel is

    related to the formation of FeCO3, which is a

    corrosion product in CO2

    environment.

    3. At high temperature a solid protective film of

    FeCO3 formed on the metal surface, which actsas a corrosion barrier against corrosion.

    REFERENCES

    1. C. de Waard, and Milliams D E, Prediction of carbonic

    acid in natural gas pipelines, First International

    Conference on the Internal and External Protection of

    Pipes paper F-1, University of Durham, September 1975.

    2. C. de Waard, Lotz U, and Milliams D E, Predictive

    model for CO2 corrosion engineering in wet natural gas

    pipelines. Corrosion 47 (1991) pp. 976985.

    3. C. de Waard and Lotz U, Prediction of CO2

    corrosion

    of carbon steelin the Oil and Gas Industry, Institute of

    Materials Publisher, UK (1994) pp. 3049.

    4. Palacios C A, and Shadley J R, Characteristics of

    corrosion scales on steel in a CO2-saturated NaCl brine.

    Corrosion 47 (1991) pp. 122127.

    5. C. de Waard and Milliams D E, Carbonic acid corrosion

    of steel. Corrosion 31 (1975) pp. 177181.

    6. Nesic S, Thevenot N, Crolet J L, and Drazic D M,

    Electrochemical properties of iron dissolution in the

    presence of CO2 Corrosion96 NACE, USA, paper 3,

    1996.

    7. Ogundele G I, and White W E, Some observations oncorrosion of carbon steel in aqueous environments

    containing carbon dioxide. Corrosion 42 (1986), pp.

    7178.

    8. Videm K, and Dugstad A, Corrosion of carbon steel in

    an aqueous carbon dioxide environment. Part 2. Film

    formation. Mats. Perf. 28 (1989), pp. 4650.

    9. Johnson M L, and Tomson M B, Ferrous carbonate

    precipitation kinetics and its impact CO2 corrosion,

    Corrosion91, NACE, USA, paper 268 1991.

    Fig.7 : XRD Patterns of all the four samples exposed at 120oC and 300 PSI