tps 1826: comparative higher education fall 2010 tuesday 1:00 … · 2011-01-25 · tps 1826:...
TRANSCRIPT
TPS 1826: Comparative Higher Education
Fall 2010
Tuesday 1:00-4:00pm
Purpose and Approach:
This course was first developed in the mid-1980s to complement Comparative Education
Theory and Methodology (1825) by focusing on higher education within the frame of comparative
education theory and methodology. In 1992-3, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the
emergence of a literature around the dialogue/clash of civilizations, a group of graduate students
worked with me to re-think the course completely. We wanted to develop an approach to comparative
higher education that emphasised culture and civilization as the basic framework, rather than the
modern political economy. We also wished to integrate feminist concerns and perspectives
throughout the course reading materials. In 2004, the course was again revised fundamentally, with
students contributing especially to the shaping of the thematic sections in Part D.
The course attempts to introduce three distinct literatures which can be drawn upon for
comparative higher education - a classic historical literature, the literature of comparative education
as it applies to higher education and social change, and the specialist literature of comparative higher
education, which deals mainly with sociological and anthropological aspects of higher education
systems. The focus is on the work of scholars that have had longstanding influence.
The course begins from a civilizational perspective, looking at higher learning institutions in
various world civilizations, and considering the situation of both women and men in these traditions.
It then turns to the great social change period that has been termed "modernization" and looks at how
comparative education scholars such as Brian Holmes, George Bereday and Gail Kelly applied their
methodology to issues of higher education in a comparative perspective. Next, it considers the
literature on comparative higher education, developed by scholars such as Burton Clark and Tony
Becher, and sees how the disciplines of sociology and anthropology are used for comparative analysis
among different national systems. This is set against a parallel feminist literature on higher education.
Next come several regional examples of higher education in the transition to "modernity" - Europe,
Latin America, and East Asia.
The final part of the course deals with themes or issues in higher education which can be
analysed using some of the theoretical frameworks suggested in the literature: university-state
relations in different societies, the professoriate, students and student movements. This fourth part
of the course is highly flexible, and students will be encouraged to work with one of the above issues,
or select a different issue for comparative reflection.
The main purpose of the course is to acquaint students with the wealth of literature available
for the study of comparative higher education, and to assist them in developing an understanding of
the different types of literature and critical judgement for selecting material from the literature.
2
Method of Evaluation: Evaluation for the course is based on a brief critical summary of one article,
book or book chapter dealing with theoretical or conceptual issues in comparative higher education
(15%). This will be due by October 19. A second short reflective paper will be due on November 16,
which should draw on selected literature and focus on an issue or theme that will be pursued in the
final research paper. (15%) We will organise small groups according to closeness of theme, so there
can be time for discussion and planning, as well as presentations of these papers during the second
half of the course. Each student will also be able to discuss the paper with the instructor on an
individual basis. The final paper will be a research essay of fifteen to twenty pages in which an issue
in higher education is analyzed comparatively. (70%) It will be due towards the end of December.
Core Reference Material for the Course:
James Forest and Philip Altbach, International Handbook of Higher Education, Parts One and Two
(Dordecht, Netherlands: 2006).
Ruth Hayhoe and Julia Pan, Knowledge Across Cultures: A Contribution to Dialogue Among
Civilizations (Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong,
2001).
Major Journals:
Comparative Education
Comparative Education Review
Higher Education: the international journal of higher education and educational planning
International Higher Education (newsletter from Boston College Higher Education Centre under
Professor Philip Altbach)
Part A: Civilizational Perspectives on Higher Education
Session 1 Higher Learning and Universities in World Civilization
Common Readings:
1. Le Than Khoi, "Towards a General Theory of Education," in Comparative Education
Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1986, pp. 12-29.
2. Rashdall, Hastings, "What is a University?" Chapter One, Volume 1 of The Universities of
Europe in the Middle Ages, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987), pp. 1-24.
3. David Noble, A World Without Women: The Christian Clerical Culture of Western Science
(New York: Alfred Knopf, 1992), Chapter Seven, pp. 138-160, and Epilogue, pp. 279-286.
Discussion Questions:
1. How does Le Than Khoi open our minds to reflect on education and higher learning at
different periods of world history and in different societies and civilizations? What were the
3
main concerns of higher learning institutions in classical civilizations? How did they relate to
religion, the natural environment, the socio-political and economic environment?
2. What does Rashdall see as the main characteristics of universities as they emerged in Europe?
In what ways did the Church, the guild and the monastery shape the medieval university in
Europe in distinctive ways?
3. How does Noble account for the exclusion of women from the newly emerging universities
of Europe? How was this exclusion justified and how did it shape the emergence of modern
science?
Additional Readings
Cobban, A.B., The Medieval Universities: Their Development and Organisation (London: Methuen,
1975).
Gabriel, Askiel, Garlandia: Studies in the History of the Medieval University, (Frankfurt am Main:
Josef Knecht, 1969).
Haskins, Charles Homer, The Rise of the University, (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press,
1965).
*Holmes, B., “Ideal Typical Normative Models,” in Comparative Education: Some
Considerations of Method (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1981), chapter 6, pp. 111-132
Kibre, Pearl, The Nations in the Medieval Universities, (Cambridge, Mass.: Medieval Academy of
America, 1948).
Kittleson, James and Transure, Pamela [eds.], Rebirth, Reform and Resilience: Universities in
Transition 1300-1700, (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1984).
Leff, Gordon, Paris and Oxford Univerities in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries: An
Institutional and Intellectual History (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1968).
Merchant, Carolyn, The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution, (San
Francisco: Harper and Row, 1980).
Perkin, Harold, “History of Universities” in James Forest and Philip Altbach, International Handbook
of Higher Education, Parts One and Two (Dordecht, Netherlands: 2006), Part One, pp. 159-206.
Piltz, Anders, The World of Medieval Learning, (New Jersey: Barnes and Noble Books, 1981),
especially pp.81-149.
Rait, Robert, Life in the Medieval Universities, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1912).
*Schachner, N., The Medieval Universities (New York: A.S. Barnes and Co., 1962), especially
4
chapters V and VII.
Sterk, Andrea, Religion, Scholarship and Higher Education: Perspectives, Models and Future
Prospects (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).
*Weber, Max, The Methodology of the Social Sciences (New York: Free Press, 1948), pp. 85-112.
[Weber’s explanation of the concept and use of ideal types]
Woody, Thomas, Life and Education in Early Societies (New York: Hafner Publishing Co., 1970).
Session 2: Asian and Middle Eastern Traditions of Higher Learning
Common Readings:
1. Altekar, A.S., Education in Ancient India (Bansphatak, Varanasi: Nand Kisore and Sons,
1944) Chapter V, pp. 105-125, Chapter IX, pp. 207-227.
2. Charles M. Stanton Higher Learning in Islam: The Classical Period A.D. 700-1300
(Maryland: Rowman and Little Publishers, 1990), “Introduction” pp. (ix-xiii).
3. Nakosteen, Mehdi, History of Islamic Origins of Western Education A.D. 800-1350
(Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado Press, 1964), Chapter II, pp. 13-24, Chapter IX,
pp. 179-195.
4. Hayhoe, R. “Lessons from the Chinese Academy,” in R. Hayhoe and J. Pan, Knowledge
Across Cultures: A Contribution to Dialogue among Civilizations (Hong Kong: Comparative
Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong, 2001), pp. 323-347.
Discussion Questions:
1. What do we learn from Altekar about the ancient institutions of higher learning in India?
What subjects were studied and how broad was their influence? What was the experience
of women in ancient Indian education?
2. What are some of the valuable aspects of Islamic higher learning which Stanton suggests
gave an important legacy to European universities?
3. Nakosteen’s account of the Academy of Jundi-Shapur and the ways in which it prospered
during the early period of Islamic development provides a dynamic picture of early
Islamic higher education. What did you find most striking in this picture? What fields of
knowledge were a particularly valuable legacy to the European universities?
4. What do you see as the most significant differences between the core values and views of
knowledge in classical Chinese institutions of higher learning and the medieval
universities of Europe? How does an understanding of these differences help to explain
the conflicts that have arisen in the development of modern Chinese universities under
Western influence? Can it be helpful in anticipating the future?
5
Additional Readings
*Altekar, A.S. "Childhood and Education," in The Position of Women in Hindu Civilization from
Prehistoric Times to the Present Day (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1962), pp. 1-28.
Berggren, Len, “Historical Reflections on Scientific Knowledge: The Case of Medieval Islam,” in
Ruth Hayhoe and Julia Pan, Knowledge Across Cultures: A Contribution to Dialogue Among
Civilizations (Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong,
2001), pp. 127-138.
Bulliet, W., The Patricians of Nishapur: A Study in Medieval Islamic Social History (Cambridge,
Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972).
*Hayhoe, Ruth, “Ideas of Higher Learning, East and West: Conflicting Values in the Development
of the Chinese University,” Minerva Vol. XXII, No. 4, Winter, 1994, pp. 361-382.
*Hu, C.T., "The Historical Background: Examinations and Controls in pre-modern China,"
Comparative Education, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1984, pp. 7-26.
Chang Chung-li, The Chinese Gentry: Studies in Their Role in the 19th Century Seattle, Washington:
University of Washington Press, 1955.
Guisso, Richard and Johannesen, Stanley Women in China: Current Directions in Historical
Scholarship (Lewiston, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1981).
Halstead, J. Mark, “An Islamic concept of education,” Comparative Education Vol. 40, No. 4, Nov.
2004, pp. 517-529.
Herrara, Linda, “Education, Islam and Modernity: Beyond Westernization and Centralization,” Essay
review of three books, in Comparative Education Review Vol. 48, No. 3, August 2003, pp. 318-326.
Ji, Shuli, “A Modern Interpretation of Sinic Science,” in Ruth Hayhoe and Julia Pan, Knowledge
Across Cultures: A Contribution to Dialogue Among Civilizations (Hong Kong: Comparative
Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong, 2001), pp. 139-151.
Ko, Dorothy et al (eds.), Women and Confucian Culture in pre-modern China, Korea and Japan
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003).
Ko, Dorothy, Teachers of the Inner Chambers: Women and Culture in Seventeenth Century China
(Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994).
Makdisi, George, The Rise of Colleges in Islam and the West (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University
Press, 1981).
6
Menzel, Joanna (ed.), The Chinese Civil Service? Career Open to Talent? (Boston: D.C. Heath and
Co., 1963).
Meskill, John, Academies in Ming China: A Historical Essay (Arizona: University of Arizona Press,
1982).
Miyazaki, Ichisada, China's Examination Hell (New Haven and London: Yale University Press,
1981).
Needham, Joseph, The Shorter Science and Civilization in China (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1978).
Rajagopal, Pinayur, “Indian Mathematics and the West” in R. Hayhoe and J. Pan (eds), Knowledge
Across Cultures: A Contribution to Dialogue among Civilizations (Hong Kong: Comparative
Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong, 2001), pp. ), pp. 113-125.
Rosenthal, Franz, Knowledge triumphant; the concept of knowledge in medieval Islam (Leiden:
E.J. Brill 1970).
*Stanton, Charles, Higher Learning in Islam: The Classical Period A.D. 700-1300 (Maryland:
Rowman and Little Publishers, 1990), Chapter 7, Formal Institutions of Higher Education, pp.
21-52)
Suen, Hoi K. and Yu, Lan, “Chronic Consequences of High-Stakes Testing? Lessons from the
Chinese Civil Service Exam,” Comparative Education Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2006, pp. 46-65.
Talbani, Aziz, “Pedagogy, Power and Discourse” Transformation of Islamic Education,”
Comparative Education Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, February, 1996, pp. 66-82.
Teng Hsu-yu, "Chinese Influence in the Western Examination System", in Harvard Journal of Asiatic
Studies, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1942-43.
Tibawi, A. L. "Origin and Character of Al-Madrasseh," in A.L. Tibawi, Arabic and Islamic Themes
(London: Luzac and Co. Ltd., 1974).
*Weber, Max, "The Chinese Literati", in Gerth and Mills (ed.), From Max Weber: Essay in
Sociology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1946), pp.416-444.
Part B Methodological Considerations in Comparative Higher Education
Session 3: Approaches from the Comparative Education Literature
Common Readings:
7
1. Brian Holmes, "Universities, Higher Education and Society," in Brian Holmes and David
Scanlon (eds.), Higher Education in a Changing World (New York: Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich, Inc., 1972), pp. 1-12.
2. George Bereday, Universities for All (San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1973), Preface (vii-xiv),
chapter one (1-18) and chapter eight (131-145).
3. Gail Kelly, "Education, Women and Change," in P. Altbach, R. Arnove and G. Kelly (eds.),
Emergent Issues in Education: Comparative Perspectives (Albany: SUNY Press, 1992), pp.
267-282.
Discussion Questions:
1. Consider how the first two readings by Holmes and Bereday exemplify hypothetico-deductive and
inductive method respectively in comparative education. What strengths and weaknesses do these
approaches have in dealing with issues concerning the modern university and the transition from elite
to mass higher education?
2. How far have Bereday's three theoretical conclusions about mass higher education been born out in
the experience of the many other nations that have moved to this phase since the early seventies?
3. How would Holmes' approach help us to reflect on dimensions of societal culture and academic
tradition which may shape the transition to mass higher education differently in various countries?
4. What has been the differential experience of women in the transition to mass higher education?
What accounts for the differences in participation by level and by knowledge area
which persist? What has happened to professional areas where women tend to dominate?
Additional Readings:
*Altbach, Philip, “Globalization and the University: Realities in an Unequal World,” in James Forest
and Philip Altbach, International Handbook of Higher Education, Part One (Dordecht, Netherlands:
2006), pp. 121-140.
Altbach, Philip, Kelly, David and Kluczynski, Jan, Higher Education in International Perspective:
A Survey and Bibliography, (London, New York: Mansell, 1985).
Altbach, Philip, The Knowledge Context, (New York: SUNY Press, 1987).
Ashby, Eric, Universities: British, Indian, African, [London: Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1966].
Ben-David, Joseph, Centers of Learning, [New York: McGraw Hill Book Co., 1977].
Burns, Barbara, Higher Education in Nine Countries: A Comparative Study of Colleges and
Universities Abroad [New York: McGraw Hill, 1971].
8
Cerych, Ladislav, and Sabatier, Paul, Great Expectations and Mixed Performance: The
Implementation of Higher Education Reforms in Europe (London: Trentham Books, 1986).
Flexner, Abraham, Universities: American, English, German [London: Oxford University Press,
1968].
Kelly, Gail "Achieving Equality in Education: Prospects and Realities," in Gail Kelly (ed.),
International Handbook of Women's Education (New York: Greenwood Press, 1989), pp. 547-569.
*Kelly, Gail, “Women and Higher Education,” in P. Altbach (ed.) International Higher Education:
An Encyclopedia (New York: Garland Publishers, 1991), pp. 297-323
Kelly, Gail Paradise, Women's higher education in comparative perspective (Dordecht,
Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, c1991. xiv, 359 p.
Kerr, Clark, Twelve Systems of Higher Education: Six Decisive Issues, (New York: International
Council for Educational Development, 1978).
Niblett, R. and Butts, R., Universities Facing the Future, World Yearbook of Education 1972-3,
[London: Evans Brothers, 1973.]
Pearson, C. (ed.), Educating the Majority: Women Challenge Tradition in Higher Education (New
York: Macmillan, 1989).
*Trow, Martin, “Reflections on the Transition from Elite to Mass to Universal Access: Forms and
Phases of Higher Education in Modern Societies since WWII,” in James Forest and Philip Altbach,
International Handbook of Higher Education, Parts One (Dordecht, Netherlands: 2006), pp. 243-280.
Session 4: Approaches from the Literature on Comparative Higher Education
1. John Van der Graff & Dorothea Furth, “Introduction” (pp.1-12) and Burton Clark,
“Academic Power: Concepts, Modes and Perspectives” (pp. 164-189) in John Van de Graff,
Burton Clark, Dorothea Furth, Dietrich Goldschmidt, Donald F. Wheeler (eds.) Academic
Power: Patterns of Authority in Seven National Systems of Higher Education (New York:
Praeger, 1978).
2. Tony Becher, "The Cultural View" in Burton Clark (Ed.), Perspectives on Higher Education:
Eight Disciplinary and Comparative Views (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984),
pp. 165-198.
3. Acker, Sandra, “Feminist Theory and the Study of Gender and Education,” International
Review of Education Vol. 33, 1987, pp. 419-435.
Discussion Questions:
9
1. What do you see as the main strengths and weaknesses of Clark's sociological approach to
comparison in higher education systems?
2. How does Becher's anthropological approach suggest a completely different set of comparisons?
Do you think this kind of comparison can be extended to non-Western patterns? What type of
adjustment might have to be made?
3. How are issues of women’s participation in higher education viewed within three major Western
feminist paradigms? What did Acker see as the limitations and possibilities of these theoretical
approaches?
Additional Readings
Acker, Sandra and Piper, David Warren, Is Higher Education Fair to Women (Surrey, Great Britain:
Society for Research on Higher Education and NFER-Nelson, 1984).
Acker, S. & Feuerverger, G. Enough is never enough: women's work in academe. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist Critical Policy Analysis - A Perspective From Post-Secondary Education (London: Falmer Press, 1997), pp. 122-140. Acker, S. , Caring as work for women educators. In E. Smyth, S. Acker, P. Bourne & A. Prentice (Eds.), Challenging Professions: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Women's Professional Work (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999), pp. 277-295.
Altbach, Philip, International Higher Education: Knowledge, the University and Development (New
York: Ablex Publishers, 1998)
*Becher, Tony, Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines
(Milton Keynes: The Open University Press, 1989, updated version in 2001). Chapters 1 and 2.
Becher, Tony, "The Disciplinary Shaping of the Professions," in Burton Clark (ed.), The Academic
Profession (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).
*Belenky, Mary, Clinchy, Blythe, Goldberger, Nancy and Tarule, Jill Women's Ways of Knowing:
The Development of Self, Voice and Mind (New York: Basic Books, 1986), "Introduction: To the
Other Side of Silence"(3-22), chapter 9: "Towards an Education for Women" (190-213), Chapter 10:
"Connected Teaching" (214-229).
Castenell, Louis and Tarule, Jill, The Minority Voice in Education Reform: an analysis of minority
and women college of education deans (Greenwich, Connecticut: Ablex Publishing Corps, 1999)
*Clark, Burton, “The Self-reliant University” in Sustaining Change in Universities: Continuities in
case studies and concepts (Maidenhead, Berkshire: The Open University Press, 2004), pp. 169-184.
10
Clark, Burton, Creating Entreprenurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation
(Oxford: Pergamon, for the IAU, 1998)
Clark Burton, Places of Enquiry: research and advanced education in modern universities
(Univerisity of California Press, 1995)
Clark, Burton, The Research Foundations of Graduate Education: Germany, France, United States,
Japan (University of California Press, 1993)
Clark, Burton, The Academic Profession: national, disciplinary and institutional settings (University
of California Press, 1987).
Clark, Burton, The Higher Education System: academic organization in cross-national perspective
(University of California Press, 1983)
Francis, Becky and Skelton, Christine, Investigating Gender: Contemporary perspectives in
education (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2001)
Harding, Sandra, The Science Question in Feminism (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press,
1986).
Harding, Sandra, Feminist Epistemology: Social Science Issues (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana
University Press, 1987)
Harding, Sandra, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives (Ithaca,
New York: Cornell University Press, 1991)
Moore, Kathryn, “Women’s Access and Opportunity in Higher Education: toward the twenty-first
century,” in Comparative Education, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1987, pp. 23-34.
*Stromquist, Nelly, “Gender Studies: A global perspective of their evolution, contribution and
challenges to comparative higher education,” Higher Education Vol. 41, No. 4, June, 2001, pp.
373-387.
*Slaughter, Sheila, “Problems in Comparative Higher Education: Political Economy, political
sociology and posmodernism,” Higher Education Vol. 41, No. 4, June 2001, pp. 389-412.
*Teichler, Ulrich, “Comparative Higher Education: potentials and limits,” in Higher Education Vol.
32, 1996, pp. 431-456.
Tight, Malcolm, “Higher education research as tribe, territory and/or community: a co-citation
analysis,”Higher Education, Vol. 55. No. 5, May 2008, pp. 593-605.
11
Part C Higher Education and Modernization
Session 5: The European Experience
Common Readings
1. Wilhelm Von Humboldt, "On the Spirit and Organisation of Intellectual Institutions in
Berlin", Minerva, April, 1970, pp.242-251.
2. H.C. Barnard, Education and the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1969), chapter 15, pp. 210-222.
3. Eric Ashby, Universities: British, Indian, African (London: Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1966),
Part I, pp.19-28.
4. Brenda Johnston and Lewis Elton, “German and UK higher education and graduate
employment: the interface between systemic tradition and graduate views” Comparative
Education Vol. 41, No. 3, August 2005, pp. 351-373.
Discussion Questions
1. What are the notable features of Humboldt's vision of the modern German university? Why
do you think it became so influential?
2. What are the main characteristics of the Napoleonic University? How would it appeal to those
interested in harnessing the university for modernization and state building tasks?
3. What five distinctive university models does Ashby identify in 19th
century Britain? Why was
the University of London see as most suitable for export?
4. Why do Johnston and Elton take a careful look at German and British traditions of higher
learning in their consideration of the aspirations of contemporary British and German
students for employment? How helpful do you find this approach?
Additional Readings
Europe
Amaral, Alberto, Neave, Guy, Musselin, Christine, Maassen, Peter (eds.) European Integration and
the Governance of Higher Education and Research (Dordecht and New York: Springer, 2009.
Amaral, Alberto and Magalhaes, Antonio, “Epidemiology and the Bologna Saga,” Higher Education,
Vol. 48, No. 1, July, 2004, pp. 79-100.
*De Wit, Hans, “European Integration in Higher Education: The Bologna process Towards a
European Higher Education Area,” in James Forest and Philip Altbach, International Handbook of
Higher Education, Part Two (Dordecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2006), pp. 461-182.
12
Enders, Juergen, “Academic Staff Mobility in the European Community: The ERASMUS
Experience,” Comparative Education Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, Feb. 1998, pp. 46-60.
Heinze, Torben and Knill, Christine, “Analysing the differential impact of the Bologna Process:
Theoretical considerations on national conditions for international policy convergence,” Higher
Education, Vol. 56, No. 4, October 2008, pp. 493-510.
Kivinen, Osmo and Nurmi, Jouni, “Unifying Higher Education for Different Kinds of Europeans.
Higher Education and Work: a comparison of ten countries,” Comparative Education Vol. 39, No. 1,
February 2003, pp. 83-104.
Kivinen, Osmo and Poikus, Petri, “Privileges of Universitas Magistrorum et Scolarium and their
justification in charters of foundation from the 13th
to the 21st centuries,” Higher Education, Vol. 52,
No. 2, September 2006, pp. 185-213.
Musselin, Christine, “European Academic Labour Markets in transition, “ Higher Education, Vol.
49, Nos. 1 and 2, January/March 2005, pp. 135-154
Palomba, Donatella, Changing Universities in Europe and the “Bologna Process” (Rome:Aracne
Editrice, 2008)
Papatsiba, V., “Making higher education more European through student mobility? Revisiting EU
initiatives in the context of the Bologna Process,” Comparative Education Vol. 42, No. 1, February,
2006 (special issue on European education)
Philips, David, “European Union Education and Training Policy,” special issue of Comparative
Education, Vol. 42, No. 1, February 2006.
Portela, M et al, “Perceptions of the Bologna Process: what do students’ choices reveal?”
France:
Archer, Margaret, Students, University and Society: A Comparative Sociological Review (London:
Heinemann, 1972)
.
Aron, Raymond, The Elusive Revolution: Anatomy of a Student Revolt (London: Pall Mall Press,
1969).
Artz, F.B., The Development of Technical Education in France 1500-1800 (Cambridge, Mass. and
London: Society for the History of Technology and M.I.T. Press, 1966).
Bourdieu, Pierre and Passeron, Jean-Claude, The Inheritors: French Students and their Relation to
Culture (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1979).
13
Cohen, Habiba, Elusive Reform: The French Universities 1968-1978 (Boulder, Colorado: Westview
Press, 1978.
Durkheim, Emile, The Evolution of Educational Thought (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul,
1977).
Grignon, C. and Passeron, J.C., French Experience Before 1968 [Paris: O.E.C.D., 1969].
Moody, Joseph, French Education Since Napoleon (New York: Syracuse University Press, 1978.
*Musselin, Christine, “France,” in James Forest and Philip Altbach, International Handbook of
Higher Education, Part Two (Dordecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2006), pp. 711-728.
Prost, Antoine, L'Enseignement en France 1800-1967 (Paris: Armand Colin, 1968).
Smith, Robert, The Ecole Normale Superieure and the Third Republic (Albany: SUNY, 1982).
Weisz, George, The Emergence of Modern Universities in France 1863-1914 (Princeton, N.J.:
Princeton University Press, 1983).
Weisz, George, "The Anatomy of University Reform 1863-1914" in Baker, Donald and Harrigan,
Patrick [eds.], The Making of a Frenchman: Current Directions in the History of Education in France
1679-1979, [Waterloo, Ontario: Historical Reflections Press, 1980], pp.363-379.
Germany:
Fallon, Daniel, The German University (Colorado: Colorado Associated University Press, 1980].
*Kehm, Barbara H., “Germany,” in James Forest and Philip Altbach, International Handbook of
Higher Education, Part Two (Dordecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2006), pp. 729-746.
Jarausch, Konrad, Students, Society and Politics in Imperial Germany: The Rise of Academic
Illiberalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982).
Jaspers, Karl, The Idea of the University) (London: Peter Owen, 1960.
Lilge, F., The Abuse of Learning: The Failure of the German University (New York: The MacMillan
Co., 1948).
McLelland, Charles, State, Society and Univerity in Germany 1700-1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1980).
Peisert, Hans and Framheim, Gerhild, Systems of Higher Education: Federal Republic of Germany
(U.S.A.: International Council for Educational Development, 1978).
14
Pritchard, Rosalind, “Humboldtian Values in a Changing World: staff and students in German
Universities,” Oxford Review of Education Vol. 30, No. 4, 2004, 509-528.
Pritchard, Rosalind, “Trends in the Restructuring of German Universities,” Comparative Education
Review Vol. 50, No. 1, February, 2006, pp. 90-112.
Ringer, Fritz, The Decline of the German Mandarinate (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University
Press, 1969).
Teichler, Ulrich, Higher Education in the Federal Republic of Germany: Developments and Recent
Issues (New York: Center for European Studies, 1986).
Weiler, Hans, “Ambivalence and the politics of knowledge: The struggle for change in German
higher education,” Higher Education, Vol. 49, Nos. 1 and 2, January/March, 2005, pp. 177-195.
United Kingdom:
Becher, Tony, Embling, Jack and Kogan, Maurice, Systems of Higher Education: United Kingdom
(New York: International Council for Educational Development, 1978).
Halsey, A.H. and Trow, Martin, The British Academics (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University
Press, 1971).
Newman, John, The Idea of a University (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960).
Lord Robbins, Higher Education Revisited (London: MacMillan, 1980).
Scott, Peter, The Crisis of the University (London: Croom Helm, 1984).
Scott, Peter, Higher Education Re-formed (England: Falmer Press, 2000).
Shattock, Michael, “United Kingdom,” in ,” in James Forest and Philip Altbach, International
Handbook of Higher Education, Part Two (Dordecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2006), pp. 1019-1034.
Session 6 The Latin American Experience
Common Readings
1. Schwartzman, Simon, "Policies for higher education in Latin America: the context," in
Higher Education, 25, 9-20, 1993, pp. 9-28.
2. Levy, Daniel, “Latin American Student Politics: beyond the 1960s,” in Philip Altbach (ed.),
Student Political Activism: An International Reference Handbook (New York:
Greenwood Press, 1989), pp. 316-337.
15
3. Arocena, Rodrigo and Sutz, Judith, “Latin American Universities: From an original
revolution to an uncertain transition,” Higher Education, Vol. 50, No. 4, November,
2005, pp. 573-592.
Discussion Questions
1. What are the distinctive characteristics of the Latin American experience of higher education
development in relation to modernization, according to Schwartzman? How helpful do you
find the ideal types used to explain these characteristics?
2. What are the historic reasons that students have played a very important role in Latin
American universities? What are the different elements in the comparative framework that
Levy develops for exploring the role of students in various countries of Latin America?
3. How do Arocena and Sutz see the present prospects of Latin American universities facing
globalization and neo-liberal economic pressures?
Additional Readings
Altbach, Philip G and Balan, Jorge, World Class Worldwide: Transforming Research Universities
in Asia and Latin America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).
Bernasconi, Andrés, “Is there a Latin American Model of the University?” in Comparative Education
Review, Vol. 52, No. 1, February, 2008.
Boothe, Leon E. "Gaining a Pan-American perspective," in Educational Record, 72:4, Fall, 1991, pp.
59-61.
*Brunner, Jose Joachim and Tillett, Anthony, “Chile” in James Forest and Philip Altbach,
International Handbook of Higher Education, Part Two (Dordecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2006), pp.
647-666.
Clark, Burton, “The Catholic University of Chile: Lessons from South America,” in Sustaining
Change in Universities ((Maidenhead, Berkshire: The Open University Press, 2004), pp. 110-121.
De Figuereido-Cowen, Maria, “Latin American Universities, Academic Freedom and Autonomy: a
long-term myth?” in Comparative Education, Vol. 38, No. 4, Nov. 2002, pp. 471-484.
Gangemi, Joseph P. and Kowalski, Casimir J., Higher Education in the United States and Latin
America (New York: Philosophical Library Inc., 1982)
*Hennessy, Alistair "Students in the Latin American University," in Joseph Maier and Richard W.
Weatherhead (eds.), The Latin American University (Alberquerque: University of New Mexico
Press, 1979), pp. 147-179.
16
Kempner, Ken and Jurema, Ana Loureiro, “The global politics of education in Brazil,” Higher
Education, Vol. 43, No. 3, April, 2002, pp. 331-354.
Levy, Daniel C., To export progress : the golden age of university assistance in the Americas
(Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2005)
Levy, Daniel C., Higher education and the State in Latin America: Private challenges to public
dominance (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986)
Liebman, A., Walker, K.N., and Glazer, Myron, Latin American University Students: A six nation
study (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972)
*Mollis, Marcela, “Latin American University Transformation of the 1990s: Altered Identities?” in
James Forest and Philip Altbach, International Handbook of Higher Education, Part Two (Dordecht,
Netherlands: 2006), pp. 503-516.
Mollis, Marcela and Marginson, Simon, “The assessment of universities in Argentina and Australia:
Between autonomy and heteronomy” in Higher Education, Vol. 43, No. 3, April, 2002, pp. 331-354.
Olivera, Carlos E. " Is education in Latin America dependent?" Prospects, 15:2, 1985, pp. 227-238.
Rhoads, Robert and Mina, Liliana, “The Student Strike at the National Autonomous University of
Mexico: A Political Analysis,” Comparative Education Review, Vol. 45, No. 3, August, 2004, pp.
334-353.
Ribeiro, Darcy. "Universities and social development," in Lipset, Seymour M. and Solari, Aldo
(eds.), Elites in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1967) pp.343-381.
Sander, Benno, "Education and dependence: The role of Comparative Education," in Prospects,
15:2, 1985, pp.195-203.
*Schwartzman, Simon, "Latin America: Higher education in a lost decade," in Prospects, 21:3, 1991,
pp. 363-373.
*Schwartzman, Simon, “Brazil” in James Forest and Philip Altbach, International Handbook of
Higher Education, Part Two (Dordecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2006), pp. 613-626.
Torres, Carlos and Schugurensky, Daniel, “The political economy of higher education in the era of
neo-liberal globalization: Latin America in comparative perspective,” Higher Education Vol. 43, No.
4, June 2002, pp. 429-455.
Vega-Jurado, I., et al, “University-industry relations in Bolivia: implications for university
transformation in Latin America, Higher Educaiton, Vol.. 56, No. 2, 2008, pp. 205-220.
Winkler, Donald R, Higher Education in Latin America; Issues of Efficiency and Equity. World
Bank Discussion Papers: Washington, D.C, 1990.
Session 7 The East Asian Experience
17
Common Readings
1. Philip Altbach, "Twisted Roots: The Western Impact on Asian higher education," in P.
Altbach and V. Selvaratnam, From Dependence to Autonomy: The Development of Asian
Universities (The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989), pp. 1-24.
2. Shigeru Nakayama, "Independence and Choice: Western Impacts on Japanese higher
education," in P. Altbach and V. Selvaratnam, From Dependence to Autonomy: The
Development of Asian Universities (The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers,
1989),pp. 97-116
3. R. Hayhoe "An Asian Multiversity: Comparative Reflections on the Transition to Mass
Higher Education in East Asia" in Comparative Education Review Vol. 39, No. 3, 1995 pp.
299-321
Discussion Questions
1. What similarities and differences do you see in the experience of Asian universities and the
transition of their societies to modernity? How might they be explained?
2. What aspects of Japan's modern higher education system are connected to its own cultural
patterns and which aspects might be seen as part of a universal process of change?
3. In what ways did China's experience with socialism give a distinctive role to her higher
education system, and make the transition to modernity different from other countries in East
Asia?
4. What choices and possibilities face China's higher education in the transition to a mass
system? Can comparative data help in anticipating how this is likely to affect women students
and faculty?
Additional Readings
East Asia
Altbach, Philip, “The Past and Future of Asian Universities: Twenty First Century Challenges,” in
Altbach, Philip and Umakoshi, Toru, Asian Universities: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary
Challenges (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004), pp. 13-32.
Chapman, David, Cummings, William and Postiglione, Gerard (eds.), Crossing Borders in East
Asian Higher Education (Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong
Kong and Springer, 2010)
*Umakoshi, Toru, “Private Higher Education in Asia: Transitions and Development,” in Altbach,
Philip and Umakoshi, Toru, Asian Universities: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary
Challenges (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004), pp. 33-52
Zeng, Kangmin, “Prayer, Luck and Spiritual Strength: The Desecularization of Entrance
Examination Systems in East Asia,” Comparative Education Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, 1996, p.
264-t279.
Shin, J.C. “Building world-class research university: The Brain Korea 21 Project,” Higher Education,
Vol. 58, NO. 5, November 2009, pp. 689-722.
18
China
Agalesto, Michael, Higher Education in Post-Mao China (Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong
press, 1998)
Chen Hsi-en, Theodore, Chinese Education Since 1949: Academic and Revolutionary Models (New
York: Pergamon Press, 1981)
Ding, Anning and Levin, John, “The interventionary state in China and programs and curricula at a
Chinese vocational university,” Higher Education, Vol. 53, No. 5, 2007, pp. 539-560.
Gu Mingyuan, Education in China and Abroad: Reflections from a Lifetime in Comparative
Education (Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong, 2001).
*Hayhoe, R., "China's Universities and Western Academic Models," in P. Altbach and V.
Selvaratnam, From Dependence to Autonomy The Development of Asian Universities (The
Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989), pp. 25-60.
Hayhoe, R. and Zha Q., “China” in James Forest and Philip Altbach, International Handbook of
Higher Education, Part Two (Dordecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2006), pp. 667-691.
Hayhoe, Ruth, Portraits of Influential Chinese Educators (Hong Kong: Comparative Education
Research Centre, University of Hong Kong, 2006).
Hawkins, John, Mao Tse-tung and Education: His Thoughts and Teachings (Connecticut: Linnet
Books, 1974).
Henze, J., "Higher Education: The Tension between Quality and Equality", in Hayhoe, R. (ed.),
Contemporary Chinese Education (London: Croom Helm, 1984)
Min Weifang, “Chinese Higher Education: The Legacy of the Past and the Context of the Future” in
Altbach, Philip and Umakoshi, Toru, Asian Universities: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary
Challenges (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004), pp. 53-84.
Mok, Ka Ho, “Globalization and educational restructuring: University merging and changing
governance in China,” Higher Education, Vol. 50, No. 1, July, 2005, pp. 57-88.
Pepper, Suzanne, Radicalism and Educational Reform in 20th- Century China: The Search for an
Ideal Development Model. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996).
Seybolt, P. (ed.), Revolutionary Education in China: Documents and Commentary (New York:
I.A.S.P. Press, 1973), pp.272-302,
Taylor, Robert, China's Intellectual Dilemma: Politics and University Enrolment 1949-1981)
(Vancouver and London: University of British Columbia Press, 1981).
Yang, Rui, “Tensions between the global and the local: A comparative illustration of the
reorgnaization of China’s higher education in the 1950s and the 1990s,” Higher Education, Vol. 39,
19
No. 3, April, 2000, pp. 319-337.
Yang, Rui, Vidovich, Lesley and Currie, Jan, “”Dancing in a Cage”: Changing autonomy in Chinese
higher education,” Higher Education, Vol. 54, NO. 4, October, 2007, pp. 575-592.
Zhong, N. and Hayhoe, R.,“University Autonomy and Civil Society in Modern China”, in G.
Peterson, R. Hayhoe and Y. Lu (eds.), Education, Culture and Identity in 20th
Century China (Ann
Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001).
Japan
Altbach, Philip and Ogawa, Yoshikazu, “Special Issue on Japan: Reform and Change in the 21st
Century” Higher Education Vol. 43, No. 1, January, 2002.
*Amano, Masako, “Women in Higher Education [in Japan]”, Higher Education, Vol. 34, No. 2,
September, 1997, pp. 215-235. (Special issue on Japanese higher education)
Amano Ikuo, "Continuity and Change in the Structure of Japanese Higher Education," in Amano
Ikuo and William Cummings (eds.), Changes in the Japanese University (New York: Praeger, 1979),
pp. 10-39.
Amano, Ikuo and Poole, Gregory, “The Japanese University in Crisis,” Higher Education, Vol. 50,
No. 4, November 2005, pp. 685-711.
Cummings, W. , Amano, I. and Kitamura, K. (eds.), Changes in the Japanese University (New York:
Praeger, 1979)
ElAgraa, Ali and Akira, Ichii, "The Japanese Education System with Special Emphasis on Higher
Education," in Higher Education, Vol. 14, No. 1, Feb., 1985, pp. 1-16.
Fujimura-Fanselow, Kumiko and Imamura, "The Education of Women in Japan," in Edward
Beauchamp (ed.), Windows on Japanese Education (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press,
1980), pp. 229-258.
Horio Teruhisa, Educational Thought and Ideology in Modern Japan: State Authority and Intellectual
Freedom (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 1988)
Hotta Taiji, "Japanese Educational Assistance to Developing Countries," in Comparative Education
Review, Vol. 35, No. 3, August, 1991, pp. 476-490.
Kaneko, Motohisa, “Japanese Higher Education: Contemporary Reform and the Influence of
Tradition,” in Altbach, Philip and Umakoshi, Toru, Asian Universities: Historical Perspectives and
Contemporary Challenges (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004), pp.
115-144.
Lincicome, Mark, "Nationalism, Internationalism and the Dilemma of Japanese Educational
Reform," in Comparative Education Review, Vol. 37, No. 2, May 1993.
Nagai Michio, Higher Education in Japan: Its Takeoff and Crash (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press,
20
1970)
Nagai, Michio, An Owl Before Dusk (Berkeley: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of
Teaching, 1975).
Nakayama, S Academic and Scientific Traditions in China Japan and the West. (Tokyo: Tokyo
University Press, 1984)
Pempel, T.J., "Higher Education: Aiding Privatized Expansion," in Pempel, Policy and Politics in
Japan: Creative Conservatism (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1982).
Smith, Henry DeWitt, Japan's First Student Radicals (Cambridge: Harvard University Pres, 1972)
Ushiogi Morikazu, "Graduate Education and Research Organization in Japan," in Burton Clark (ed.),
The Research Foundations of Graduate Education (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).
Yamashita Shoichi, Transfer of Japanese Technology and Management to the ASEAN Countries
(Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 1991)
Yonezawa, Akiyoshi, “Japanese flagship universities at a crossroads,” Higher Education, Vol. 54,
No. 4, October 2007, pp. 483-499.
Part D Issues for Comparative Analysis
Session 8: Higher Education and the State
Common Readings:
1. Neave, Guy, “The European Dimension in Higher Education: An Extension into the Modern
Use of Analogues,” in J. Huisman, P. Maassen and G. Neave (eds.), Higher Education and the
Nation State: The International Dimension of Higher Education (Oxford: Pergamon, 2001),
pp. 13-75.
2. DeFigueirdo-Cowen, Maria, “Latin American Universities, Academic Freedom and
Autonomy: a long-term myth?” in Comparative Education, Vol 38, No. 4, pp. 471-484.
3. King, Alexander F., “The Changing Face of Accountability: Monitoring and Assessing
Institutional Performance in Higher Education, The Journal of Higher Education Vol. 71, No.
4, 2000, pp. 411-431.
Discussion Questions:
1. How does Guy Neave define the difference between state controlled and state
supervisory models of higher education? How important is history and an
understanding of longstanding cultural factors in the comparative understanding of
different types of university-state relations in Europe and North America? What did
you find most helpful for a deep understanding of differences in Neave’s account?
2. How have the values of university autonomy and academic freedom been played out
in the experience of Brazil and other Latin American countries over the twentieth
century? What are the most important points made in the analysis of De
Figureido-Cowan?
21
3. How is globalization and marketization affecting university-state relations in OECD
countries, according to King? What do you see as the benefits and risks of using
performance-based accountability instruments to ensure the accountability of public
higher education systems to the state?
Additional Readings:
Altbach, Philip, “Academic Freedom: International realities and challenges,” Higher Education, Vol.
41, pp. 205-219.
Ashby, Eric, Universities: British, Indian, African (London: Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1966), Part
III, pp. 320-343.
Berdahl, Robert O. and Millett, John D. "Autonomy and Accountability in U.S. Higher Education,"
in Guy Neave and Frans A. Van Vught (eds.), Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship
between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990, pp.
215-238.
Bruneau, William and Savage, D.C., Counting out the Scholars: The Case Against Performance
Indicators in Higher Education (Toronto: CAUT Series, 2002).
*Caston, Geoffrey "Academic Freedom: The Third World Context," in Oxford Review of Education,
Vol. 15, No. 3, 1989, pp. 305-338.
Clark, Burton, and Youn, Ted, Academic Power in the United States (Washington, D.C.: The
American Asociation for Higher Education, 1976).
De la Fuente J.R., “Academic freedom and social responsibility,” Higher Education Policy Vol. 15,
No. 4, pp. 337-339.
Hofstadter, R. and Metzger, W., The Development of Academic Freedom in the United States (New
York and London: Columbia University Press, 1955).
Horta, H., “Global and national prominent universities: internationalization, competitiveness and the
role of the State,” Higher Education, Vol. 58, No. 3, Sept. 2009, pp. 387-405.
Li-Chuan, C., “The relationship between university autonomy and funding in England and Taiwan,”
Higher Education Vol. 48, No. 2, 2004, pp. 189-212.
Meek, V.L., “Changing Patterns in Modes of Coordination of Higher Education,” in J. Enders and
O. Fulton (eds.) Higher Education in a Globalizing World (Dordecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, 2002).
Mok Ka-Ho, “Globalisation and Higher Education Restructuring in Hong Kong, Taiwan and
Mainland China,” in Higher Education Research and Development Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 117-129.
Neave, Guy and Van Vught, Franz, Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship between
Government and Higher Education in Western Europe (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1991).
Neave, G. and Van Vught, F.A., “Government and Higher Education in Developing Nations: A
22
Conceptual Framework,” in G. Neave and F.A. Van Vught, Government and Higher Education
Relationships Across Three Continents: The Winds of Change (Oxford:Pergamon Press, 1994).
Ordorika, I., “The Limits of University Autonomy: Power and Politics at the Universidad Nacional
Autonoma de Mexico, Higher Education Vol. 46, 2004, pp. 361-388.
Sirat, Morshidi and Kaur, Sarjit, “Changing state-university relations: the experiences of Japan and
lessons for Malaysia, Comparative Education, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2010, pp. 189-206.
Skolnik, Michael and Jones, Glen, "A Comparative Analysis of State Coordination of Higher
Education in Canada and the United states," in Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 63, No. 2
(March/April, 1992), pp. 121-142.
Slaughter, Sheila, "Academic Freedom and the State: Reflections on the Uses of Knowledge," in
Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 59, No. 3 (May/June, 1988), pp. 241-262.
Session 9: The Professoriate
Common Readings:
1. Antony Welch, “The End of Certainty: The Academic Profession and the Challenge of
Change,” Comparative Education Review Vol. 42, No. 1, February, 1998, pp. 1-14.
2. Esther E. Gottlieb and Bruce Keith, “The academic research-teaching nexus in eight
advanced industrialized countries,” Higher Education, Vol. 34, No. 3, October 1997, pp.
397-420.
3. Sandra Acker, “Gendered Games in Academic Leadership,” International Studies in
Sociology of Education, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 129-152.
.
Discussion Questions:
1. In what ways does the professoriate differ from other professions? Consider definitions of
work, governance and control, prestige, affiliation, reward structures and other variables you
believe are relevant. What are the main pressures for change identified in Welch’s essay?
How does he view the future of the profession?
2. What does historical analysis and understanding contribute to Gottlieb and Keith’s study of
the ways in which research and teaching interact in the academic profession? What do you
consider the most significant findings of the empirical study of faculty in eight countries?
Why?
3. To what extent is it possible to generalize a woman's experience in the professoriate? To
what extent are women professors in leadership positions handling the pressures of
globalization and change differently than men might do in the three countries covered in
Acker’s study?
Additional Readings
Acker, Sandra, “Gender Equity and Tenure,” in Academic Matters, Journal of OCUFA, forthcoming in 2009. Sandra Acker, “Gender, Leadership and Change in faculties of education in three countries,” in C. Reynolds and J. Collard (eds.), Leadership, Gender and Culture (Maidenhead: Open University
23
Press, 2005.), pp. 210-224 Acker, Sandra, “Gender and the Chair,” in Wagner, Anne, Acker, Sandra & Mayuzumi, Kimine
(eds.), Whose University Is It, Anyway? Power and Privilege on Gendered Terrain (Toronto:
Sumach Press, 2008). Acker, S. & Armenti, C. (2004). Sleepless in academia Gender and Education, 16 (1), 3-24. Akerlind, Gerlese S., “Academic growth and development – How do university academics experience it?” Higher Education Vol. 50, No. 1, July 2005, pp. 1-32.
Altbach, Philip and Chait, Richard, “Special Issue on the Changing Academic Workplace:
Comparative Perspectives, Higher Education, Vol. 41, Nos. 1-2, January-March, 2000. (Essays on
Germany, Britain, France, The Netherlands, Italy, Spain and the United States)
Altbach, Philip, Comparative Perspectives on the Academic Profession (New York and London:
Praeger Publishers, 1977)
Bain, Olga and Cummings, William “Academe’s Glass Ceiling: Professional, Organizational and
institutional Barriers to the Career Advancement of Academic Women,” Comparative Education
Review, Vol. 44, No. 4, November 2000, pp. 493-514.
Boyer, E, Altbach, P., Whitelaw, M. The academic profession: An international perspective
(Princeton, New Jersey: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1994).
Boyer, Ernest, Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (Lawrenceville, New Jersey:
Princeton University Press, 1990.
Caplin, P., Lifting a Ton of Feathers: A Woman's Guide to Surviving in the Academic World
(Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993).
Chevaillier, “French academics: Between the professions and the civil service,” Higher Education
Vol. 41, Nos. 1-2, January-March, 2000, pp. 49-75.
Clark, Burton (ed.), The Academic Profession: National, Disciplinary and Institutional Settings
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).
Clark, Burton, The Academic Life: Small Worlds Different Worlds (Princeton, New Jersey: The
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Learning, 1987), “Forward” by Ernest Boyers,
“Introduction” (pp. xxi-xxx) and Chapter VII, “The Promises of Career” (pp. 187-222)
Clifford, Geraldine J. , Lone Voyagers: Academic Women in Coeducational Universities 1870-1937
(New York: The Feminist Press at the City University of New York, 1989), "Introduction," pp. 1-44.
Currie, Jan, “Globalization Pressures and the Professoriate in Anglo-Pacific and North American
Universities,” Comparative Education Vol. 42, No. 1, February, 1998, pp. 15-29.
Enders, Juergen, “The Academic Profession,” in James Forest and Philip Altbach, International
Handbook of Higher Education, Part One (Dordecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2006), pp. 5-21.
24
Enders, Juergen, “A chair system in transition: Appointments, promotions, and gate-keeping in
German higher education,” Higher Education, Vol. 41, Nos. 1-2, January-March, 2000, pp. 3-25.
He, Xiao-Xing et al, “A comparative study of stress among university faculty in China and Japan,”
Higher Education Vol. 39, No. 3, April 2000, pp. 253-278
Lie, S. and O'Leary, V., Storming the Tower: Women in the Academic World (London: Kogan Page,
1990.
Lindsay, Beverley, “Women Chief Executives and their Approach Towards Equity in American
Universities,” Comparative EducationVol. 35, No. 2, June 1999, pp. 187-200.
Luke, Caren Globalization and Women in Academia: North/West-South/East (London and
Mahwah, NewJersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2001)
Makabola, R. and Green, A. (eds.), Sisters of the Academy: Emergent Black Women Scholars in
Higher Education (Sterling, Virginia: Stylus, 2001).
Mamiseishvili, K, “Foreign-born women faculty work roles and productivity at research universities
in the United States,” Higher Education, Vol. 60, No. 2, August, 2010, pp. 139-156.
Neave, Guy and Rhoades, Gary "The Academic Estate in Western Europe," in B. Clark (ed.), The
Academic Profession: National, Disciplinary and Institutional Settings (Berkeley: University of
California Press, 1987), pp. 211-270.
Poole, Millicent, Bornholt, Laurel and Summers, Finoa, “An international study of the gendered
nature of academic work: Some cross-cultural explorations,” Higher Education, Vol. 34, No. 3,
October 1997, pp. 373-396.
Pritchard, Rosalind, “The influence of market force culture on British and German academics,”
Comparative Education Vol. 41, No. 4, November, 2005, pp. 433-454.
Research Institute for Higher Education, The Changing Academic Profession in International
Comparative and Quantitative Perspectives (Hiroshima, Research Institute for Higher Education,
2008).
Research Institute for Higher Education, The Changing Academic Profession over 1992-2007:
International Comparative and Quantitative Perspectives (Hiroshima, Research Institute for Higher
Education, 2009).
Ssesanga, Karim and Garrett, Roger M., “Job satisfaction of University academics: Perspectives from
Uganda,” Higher Education Vol. 50, No. 1, July 2005, pp. 33-5.
Twombly, Susan, “Women Academic leaders in a Latin American university: Reconciling the
paradoxes of professional lives,” Higher Education Vol. 35, No. 4, June 1998, pp. 367-397.
Watson, Cicely (ed.), The Professoriate: Occupation in Crisis (Toronto: Higher Education Group,
OISE, 1985).
25
Witt, S, The Pursuit of Race and Gender Equity in American Academe (New York: Praeger, 1990).
Wyn, J., Acker, S., and Richards, E. (2000). Making a difference: women in management in Australian and Canadian faculties of education. Gender and Education 12 (4): 435-447.
Session 10: Students and Student Movements
Common Readings:
1. Seymour Martin Lipset, "Students and Politics in Comparative Perspective," in Philip
Altbach (ed.), The Student Revolution: A Global Analysis (Bombay: Lalvani Publishing
House, 1970), pp. 29-49.
2. Philip Altbach, “Student Politics: Activism and Culture,” in James Forest and Philip Altbach,
International Handbook of Higher Education, Part One (Dordecht, Netherlands: Springer,
2006), pp. 329-346.
3. Robert A. Rhoads, “Preface and Acknowledgements” and Chapter One, “Passion and Protest
on Campus,” Freedom’s Web: Student Activism in an Age of Cultural Diversity (Baltimore
and London: The John Hopkins University Press, 1998), pp. i-vii, 1-27.
Discussion Questions:
1. What different aspects of a student's background are likely to affect their decisions about
involvement in political movements? What broad contextual factors seem to lie behind the
emergence of and development of student movements according to Lipset?
2. What major comparative distinctions does Philip Altbach identify in a retrospective look at
student politics from the perspective of the 21st century?
3. What new dimensions does Rhoads identify in student activism that are related to issues of
cultural diversity?
Additional Readings:
Altbach, Philip, “Student Politics and Higher Education in India,” in P. Altbach (ed.) Turmoil and
Transition: Higher Education and Student Politics in India (New York: Basic Books, 1968).
Altbach, Philip (ed.), Student Politics: Perspectives for the Eighties (Methuen, New Jersey:
Scarecrow Press, 1981).
Altbach, Philip and Cohen, Robert, “American Student Activism: The Post-Sixties Transformation,”
Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 61, No. 1, 1990, pp. 32-49.
DeGroot, Gerard (ed.), Student Protest: The Sixties and After (New York: Longman Ltd., 1998).
Hazary, Subas Chandra, Student Politics in India (New Delhi: Ashish Publishing House, 1987).
Levitt, Cyril, C hildren of Privilege: Student Revolt in the Sixties: A Study of Student Movements in
Canada, the United States and Western Germany (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1984).
Levy, Daniel, “Student Politics in Contemporary Latin America,” in Altbach, Philip (ed.), Student
Politics: Perspectives for the Eighties (Methuen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press, 1981), pp. 187-213.
26
*Levy, Daniel, “Latin American Student Politics: beyond the 1960s,” in Philip Altbach (ed.), Student
Political Activism: An International Reference Handbook (New York: Greenwood Press, 1989), pp.
316-337.
Liebman, Arthur, Walker, Kenneth and Glazor, Martin, “Universities, University reform and student
Politics in Latin America: A Historical Overview,” in Seymor Martin Lipset (ed.) Latin American
University Students: A Six Nation Study (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972), pp.
1-32.
Lipset, Seymour Martin, Rebellion in the University, Third Edition (New Brunswick, New Jersey:
Transaction Publishers, 1993).
*Rhoads, Robert, “Collectivist Consciousness: Towards an Activist Identity,” Chapter Eight, in
Freedom’s Web: Student Activism in an Age of Cultural Diversity (Baltimore and London: Johns
Hopkins University Press, 1998).
Slocum, Jenée and Rhoads, Robert, A., “Faculty and Student Engagement in the Argentine grassroots
rebellion: toward a democratic and emancipatory vision of the university,” Higher Education, Vol.
57, No. 1, January, 2007, pp. 85-105.