trace elements note magnitude of major element changes from winter (2001) an introduction to igneous...
TRANSCRIPT
Trace ElementsTrace Elements
Note Note magnitudmagnitude of e of majormajor element element changeschanges
Figure 8-2. Harker variation diagram for 310 analyzed volcanic rocks from Crater Lake (Mt. Mazama), Oregon Cascades. Data compiled by Rick Conrey (personal communication). From Winter (2001) An From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Petrology. Prentice Hall.
wt %
wt %
Figure 9-1.Figure 9-1. Harker Diagram for Crater Lake. From data Harker Diagram for Crater Lake. From data compiled by Rick Conrey. From Winter (2001) An Introduction compiled by Rick Conrey. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.
Note Note magnitudmagnitude of e of tracetrace element element changeschanges
Trace ElementsTrace Elements
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
Element DistributionElement DistributionGoldschmidt’s rules (simplistic, but useful)Goldschmidt’s rules (simplistic, but useful)
1.1. Two ions with the same valence and radius Two ions with the same valence and radius should exchange easily and enter a solid should exchange easily and enter a solid solution in amounts equal to their overall solution in amounts equal to their overall proportionsproportions
How does Rb behave? Ni?How does Rb behave? Ni?
Goldschmidt’s rulesGoldschmidt’s rules
2. If two ions have a similar radius and the same 2. If two ions have a similar radius and the same valence: the smaller ion is preferentially incorporated valence: the smaller ion is preferentially incorporated into the solid over the liquidinto the solid over the liquid
Fig. 6-10. Isobaric T-X phase diagram at atmospheric pressure After Bowen and Shairer (1932), Amer. J. Sci. 5th Ser., 24, 177-213. From Winter From Winter (2001) An Introduction to (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Petrology. Prentice Hall.
Relative ionic radii for common valencesand coordination numbers
Preference forPreference formineral phasemineral phase
PreferencePreferencefor meltfor melt
Plot of ionic radius vs. ionic charge for trace elements of geological interest. Ionic radii are quoted for eight-fold coordination to allow for comparison between elements. From Rollinson(1993).
Ionic chargeIonic chargevs. radiusvs. radius
3. If two ions have a similar radius, but different valence: the ion with the higher charge is preferentially incorporated into the solid over the liquid
Chemical FractionationChemical Fractionation
The uneven distribution of an ion between The uneven distribution of an ion between two competing (equilibrium) phasestwo competing (equilibrium) phases
Exchange equilibrium of a Exchange equilibrium of a componentcomponent ii between between two two phasesphases (solid and liquid) (solid and liquid)
ii (liquid)(liquid) = = ii (solid)(solid)
KKDD = = = =
K =K = equilibrium constantequilibrium constant
a a solidsolid
a a liquidliquidii
ii
XX solidsolid
XX liquidliquidii
ii
ii
ii
Trace element concentrations are in the Trace element concentrations are in the Henry’s Law region of concentration, so Henry’s Law region of concentration, so their activity varies in direct relation to their their activity varies in direct relation to their concentration in the system, where [a] = (c)concentration in the system, where [a] = (c)
Thus if XThus if XNiNi in the system doubles the X in the system doubles the XNiNi in in
all all phases will doublephases will double This does not mean that XThis does not mean that XNiNi in all phases in all phases
is the same, since trace elements do is the same, since trace elements do fractionate. Rather the Xfractionate. Rather the XNiNi within each within each
phase will vary in proportion to the phase will vary in proportion to the system concentrationsystem concentration
incompatibleincompatible elements are concentrated in the elements are concentrated in the melt melt
(K(KDD or D) « 1 or D) « 1
compatiblecompatible elements are concentrated in the elements are concentrated in the solid solid
KKDD or D » 1 or D » 1
where D is the partition coefficient for any given trace where D is the partition coefficient for any given trace element between phases; D is a constant for dilute element between phases; D is a constant for dilute concentrations of elementsconcentrations of elements
For dilute solutions can substitute D for KFor dilute solutions can substitute D for KDD::
D =D =
Where CWhere CSS = the concentration of some element in = the concentration of some element in
the solid phasethe solid phase
CCSS
CCLL
IncompatibleIncompatible elements commonly elements commonly two subgroups two subgroups
Smaller, highly charged Smaller, highly charged high field strength (HFS)high field strength (HFS) elementselements (REE, Th, U, Ce, Pb(REE, Th, U, Ce, Pb4+4+, Zr, Hf, Ti, Nb, , Zr, Hf, Ti, Nb, Ta)Ta)
Low field strength Low field strength large ion lithophile (LIL)large ion lithophile (LIL) elements elements (K, Rb, Cs, Ba, Pb(K, Rb, Cs, Ba, Pb2+2+, Sr, Eu, Sr, Eu2+2+)) are more are more mobile, particularly if a fluid phase is involvedmobile, particularly if a fluid phase is involved
High field strength (HFS) elementsHigh field strength (HFS) elementsSmaller, highly chargedSmaller, highly charged
Large Ion Lithophiles (LILs)Large Ion Lithophiles (LILs)Low field strength (large ions, Low field strength (large ions, lower charge), more mobilelower charge), more mobile
Table 9-1. Partition Coefficients (CS/CL) for Some Commonly Used Trace
Elements in Basaltic and Andesitic Rocks
Olivine Opx Cpx Garnet Plag Amph MagnetiteRb 0.010 0.022 0.031 0.042 0.071 0.29 Sr 0.014 0.040 0.060 0.012 1.830 0.46 Ba 0.010 0.013 0.026 0.023 0.23 0.42 Ni 14 5 7 0.955 0.01 6.8 29Cr 0.70 10 34 1.345 0.01 2.00 7.4La 0.007 0.03 0.056 0.001 0.148 0.544 2Ce 0.006 0.02 0.092 0.007 0.082 0.843 2Nd 0.006 0.03 0.230 0.026 0.055 1.340 2Sm 0.007 0.05 0.445 0.102 0.039 1.804 1Eu 0.007 0.05 0.474 0.243 0.1/1.5* 1.557 1Dy 0.013 0.15 0.582 1.940 0.023 2.024 1Er 0.026 0.23 0.583 4.700 0.020 1.740 1.5Yb 0.049 0.34 0.542 6.167 0.023 1.642 1.4Lu 0.045 0.42 0.506 6.950 0.019 1.563Data from Rollinson (1993). * Eu3+/Eu2+ Italics are estimated
Rare Earth Elements
Compatibility depends on minerals and melts involved. Compatibility depends on minerals and melts involved.
Which are incompatible? Why?Which are incompatible? Why?
For a For a rock,rock, determine the determine the bulk distribution bulk distribution coefficient Dcoefficient D for an element by calculating for an element by calculating the contribution for each mineralthe contribution for each mineral
DDii = = W WAA D DiAiA
WWAA = weight % of mineral A in the rock = weight % of mineral A in the rock
DDii = partition coefficient of element i in = partition coefficient of element i in
mineral Amineral A
AA
AA
Example: hypothetical garnet lherzolite = 60% olivine, 25% Example: hypothetical garnet lherzolite = 60% olivine, 25% orthopyroxene, 10% clinopyroxene, and 5% garnet (all by orthopyroxene, 10% clinopyroxene, and 5% garnet (all by weightweight), ), using the data in Table 9-1, is:using the data in Table 9-1, is:
DDErEr = (0.6 · 0.026) + (0.25 · 0.23) + (0.10 · 0.583) + (0.05 · 4.7) = = (0.6 · 0.026) + (0.25 · 0.23) + (0.10 · 0.583) + (0.05 · 4.7) =
0.3660.366
Table 9-1. Partition Coefficients (CS/CL) for Some Commonly Used Trace
Elements in Basaltic and Andesitic Rocks
Olivine Opx Cpx Garnet Plag Amph MagnetiteRb 0.010 0.022 0.031 0.042 0.071 0.29 Sr 0.014 0.040 0.060 0.012 1.830 0.46 Ba 0.010 0.013 0.026 0.023 0.23 0.42 Ni 14 5 7 0.955 0.01 6.8 29Cr 0.70 10 34 1.345 0.01 2.00 7.4La 0.007 0.03 0.056 0.001 0.148 0.544 2Ce 0.006 0.02 0.092 0.007 0.082 0.843 2Nd 0.006 0.03 0.230 0.026 0.055 1.340 2Sm 0.007 0.05 0.445 0.102 0.039 1.804 1Eu 0.007 0.05 0.474 0.243 0.1/1.5* 1.557 1Dy 0.013 0.15 0.582 1.940 0.023 2.024 1Er 0.026 0.23 0.583 4.700 0.020 1.740 1.5Yb 0.049 0.34 0.542 6.167 0.023 1.642 1.4Lu 0.045 0.42 0.506 6.950 0.019 1.563Data from Rollinson (1993). * Eu3+/Eu2+ Italics are estimated
Rare Earth Elements
Trace elements strongly partitioned into a single mineralTrace elements strongly partitioned into a single mineral Ni - olivine = 14Ni - olivine = 14
Figure 9-1a.Figure 9-1a. Ni Harker Diagram for Crater Lake. From data compiled by Rick Conrey. From Ni Harker Diagram for Crater Lake. From data compiled by Rick Conrey. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.
Incompatible trace elements concentrate Incompatible trace elements concentrate liquid liquid
Reflect the proportion of liquid at a given state of Reflect the proportion of liquid at a given state of crystallization or meltingcrystallization or melting
Figure 9-1b.Figure 9-1b. Zr Harker Diagram for Crater Lake. From data compiled by Rick Conrey. Zr Harker Diagram for Crater Lake. From data compiled by Rick Conrey. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.
Trace Element BehaviorTrace Element Behavior The concentration of a The concentration of a majormajor element in a phase is element in a phase is
usually buffered by the system, so that it varies usually buffered by the system, so that it varies little in a phase as the system composition changeslittle in a phase as the system composition changes
At a given T we could vary At a given T we could vary XXmeltmelt from 20 from 20 60 % 60 % Mg/Fe without changing the Mg/Fe without changing the composition of the melt or composition of the melt or the olivinethe olivine
Trace elementTrace element concentrations are in the concentrations are in the Henry’s Law region of concentration, so Henry’s Law region of concentration, so their activity varies in direct relation to their their activity varies in direct relation to their concentration in the systemconcentration in the system
Trace element concentrations are in the Trace element concentrations are in the Henry’s Law region of concentration, so Henry’s Law region of concentration, so their activity varies in direct relation to their their activity varies in direct relation to their concentration in the systemconcentration in the system
Thus if XThus if XNiNi in the system doubles the X in the system doubles the XNiNi in all in all
phases will doublephases will double
Trace element concentrations are in the Trace element concentrations are in the Henry’s Law region of concentration, so Henry’s Law region of concentration, so their activity varies in direct relation to their their activity varies in direct relation to their concentration in the systemconcentration in the system
Thus if XThus if XNiNi in the system doubles the X in the system doubles the XNiNi in all in all
phases will doublephases will double
Because of this, the Because of this, the ratiosratios of trace elements of trace elements are often superior to the concentration of a are often superior to the concentration of a single element in identifying the role of a single element in identifying the role of a specific mineralspecific mineral
K/RbK/Rb often used often used the importance of the importance of amphiboleamphibole in a source rock in a source rock K & Rb behave very similarly, so K & Rb behave very similarly, so K/Rb should be ~ constantK/Rb should be ~ constant If amphibole, almost all K and Rb reside in itIf amphibole, almost all K and Rb reside in it Amphibole has a D of about 1.0 for K and 0.3 for RbAmphibole has a D of about 1.0 for K and 0.3 for Rb
Table 9-1. Partition Coefficients (CS/CL) for Some Commonly Used Trace
Elements in Basaltic and Andesitic Rocks
Olivine Opx Cpx Garnet Plag Amph MagnetiteRb 0.010 0.022 0.031 0.042 0.071 0.29 Sr 0.014 0.040 0.060 0.012 1.830 0.46 Ba 0.010 0.013 0.026 0.023 0.23 0.42 Ni 14 5 7 0.955 0.01 6.8 29Cr 0.70 10 34 1.345 0.01 2.00 7.4La 0.007 0.03 0.056 0.001 0.148 0.544 2Ce 0.006 0.02 0.092 0.007 0.082 0.843 2Nd 0.006 0.03 0.230 0.026 0.055 1.340 2Sm 0.007 0.05 0.445 0.102 0.039 1.804 1Eu 0.007 0.05 0.474 0.243 0.1/1.5* 1.557 1Dy 0.013 0.15 0.582 1.940 0.023 2.024 1Er 0.026 0.23 0.583 4.700 0.020 1.740 1.5Yb 0.049 0.34 0.542 6.167 0.023 1.642 1.4Lu 0.045 0.42 0.506 6.950 0.019 1.563Data from Rollinson (1993). * Eu3+/Eu2+ Italics are estimated
Rare Earth Elements
Sr and Ba (also Sr and Ba (also incompatibleincompatible elements) elements) SrSr is excluded from most common minerals is excluded from most common minerals
except except plagioclaseplagioclase BaBa similarly excluded except in similarly excluded except in alkali feldsparalkali feldspar
Table 9-1. Partition Coefficients (CS/CL) for Some Commonly Used Trace
Elements in Basaltic and Andesitic Rocks
Olivine Opx Cpx Garnet Plag Amph MagnetiteRb 0.010 0.022 0.031 0.042 0.071 0.29 Sr 0.014 0.040 0.060 0.012 1.830 0.46 Ba 0.010 0.013 0.026 0.023 0.23 0.42 Ni 14 5 7 0.955 0.01 6.8 29Cr 0.70 10 34 1.345 0.01 2.00 7.4La 0.007 0.03 0.056 0.001 0.148 0.544 2Ce 0.006 0.02 0.092 0.007 0.082 0.843 2Nd 0.006 0.03 0.230 0.026 0.055 1.340 2Sm 0.007 0.05 0.445 0.102 0.039 1.804 1Eu 0.007 0.05 0.474 0.243 0.1/1.5* 1.557 1Dy 0.013 0.15 0.582 1.940 0.023 2.024 1Er 0.026 0.23 0.583 4.700 0.020 1.740 1.5Yb 0.049 0.34 0.542 6.167 0.023 1.642 1.4Lu 0.045 0.42 0.506 6.950 0.019 1.563Data from Rollinson (1993). * Eu3+/Eu2+ Italics are estimated
Rare Earth Elements
CompatibleCompatible example: example: NiNi strongly fractionated strongly fractionated olivineolivine > pyroxene > pyroxene CrCr and and ScSc pyroxenespyroxenes » olivine » olivine Ni/Cr or Ni/Sc can distinguish the effects of olivine Ni/Cr or Ni/Sc can distinguish the effects of olivine
and augite in a partial melt or a suite of rocks and augite in a partial melt or a suite of rocks produced by fractional crystallizationproduced by fractional crystallization
Models of Magma EvolutionModels of Magma Evolution Batch MeltingBatch Melting
The melt remains resident until at some point it is The melt remains resident until at some point it is released and moves upwardreleased and moves upward
Equilibrium melting process with variable % Equilibrium melting process with variable % meltingmelting
Models of Magma EvolutionModels of Magma Evolution Batch MeltingBatch Melting
CCLL = trace element concentration in the liquid = trace element concentration in the liquid
CCOO = trace element concentration in the original rock = trace element concentration in the original rock
before melting beganbefore melting began
F = wt fraction of melt F = wt fraction of melt producedproduced = melt/(melt + rock) = melt/(melt + rock)
CCCC
11DDii(1(1 F)F) FF
LL
OO
Batch MeltingBatch Melting
A plot of CA plot of CLL/C/COO vs. F for various vs. F for various
values of Dvalues of Dii using the using the
previous equationprevious equation DDii = 1.0 = 1.0
Figure 9-2.Figure 9-2. Variation in the relative concentration of a Variation in the relative concentration of a trace element in a liquid vs. source rock as a fiunction trace element in a liquid vs. source rock as a fiunction of D and the fraction melted, using equation (9-5) for of D and the fraction melted, using equation (9-5) for equilibrium batch melting. From Winter (2001) An equilibrium batch melting. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Prentice Hall.
DDii » 1.0 ( » 1.0 (compatible compatible element)element)
Very low concentration in Very low concentration in meltmelt
Especially for low % Especially for low % melting (low F)melting (low F)
Figure 9-2.Figure 9-2. Variation in the relative concentration of a Variation in the relative concentration of a trace element in a liquid vs. source rock as a fiunction trace element in a liquid vs. source rock as a fiunction of D and the fraction melted, using equation (9-5) for of D and the fraction melted, using equation (9-5) for equilibrium batch melting. From Winter (2001) An equilibrium batch melting. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Prentice Hall.
Highly Highly incompatibleincompatible elements elements
• • Greatly concentrated in the Greatly concentrated in the initial small fraction of melt initial small fraction of melt produced by partial meltingproduced by partial melting
• • Subsequently diluted as F Subsequently diluted as F increasesincreases
Figure 9-2.Figure 9-2. Variation in the relative concentration of a Variation in the relative concentration of a trace element in a liquid vs. source rock as a fiunction trace element in a liquid vs. source rock as a fiunction of D and the fraction melted, using equation (9-5) for of D and the fraction melted, using equation (9-5) for equilibrium batch melting. From Winter (2001) An equilibrium batch melting. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Prentice Hall.
As F As F 1 the concentration of 1 the concentration of everyevery trace element in the liquid trace element in the liquid = the source rock (C= the source rock (CLL/C/COO 1) 1)
As F As F 11
CCLL/C/COO
1 1
CC
1Di (1 F) F
L
O
Figure 9-2.Figure 9-2. Variation in the relative concentration of a Variation in the relative concentration of a trace element in a liquid vs. source rock as a fiunction trace element in a liquid vs. source rock as a fiunction of D and the fraction melted, using equation (9-5) for of D and the fraction melted, using equation (9-5) for equilibrium batch melting. From Winter (2001) An equilibrium batch melting. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Prentice Hall.
As F As F 0 0 CCLL/C/COO 1/D 1/Dii
If we know CIf we know CLL of a magma derived of a magma derived
by a small degree of batch melting, by a small degree of batch melting, and we know Dand we know Dii we can estimate we can estimate
the concentration of that element the concentration of that element in the source region (Cin the source region (COO))
CC
1Di (1 F) F
L
O
Figure 9-2.Figure 9-2. Variation in the relative concentration of a Variation in the relative concentration of a trace element in a liquid vs. source rock as a fiunction trace element in a liquid vs. source rock as a fiunction of D and the fraction melted, using equation (9-5) for of D and the fraction melted, using equation (9-5) for equilibrium batch melting. From Winter (2001) An equilibrium batch melting. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Prentice Hall.
For very For very incompatibleincompatible elements as D elements as Dii 0 0
reduces reduces to:to:
C
C
1
FL
O
CC
1Di (1 F) F
L
O
If we know the concentration of a very If we know the concentration of a very incompatible element in both a magma and the incompatible element in both a magma and the source rock, we can determine the fraction of source rock, we can determine the fraction of partial melt producedpartial melt produced
Worked Example of Batch Melting: Worked Example of Batch Melting: Rb and Rb and SrSrBasalt with the mode:Basalt with the mode:
1.1. Convert to Convert to weightweight % minerals (W % minerals (Wolol W Wcpxcpx etc.) etc.)
Table 9-2. Conversion from mode to
weight percent
Mineral Mode Density Wt prop Wt%
ol 15 3.6 54 0.18
cpx 33 3.4 112.2 0.37
plag 51 2.7 137.7 0.45
Sum 303.9 1.00
Worked Example of Batch Melting: Worked Example of Batch Melting: Rb and Rb and SrSr
Table 9-2. Conversion from mode to
weight percent
Mineral Mode Density Wt prop Wt%
ol 15 3.6 54 0.18
cpx 33 3.4 112.2 0.37
plag 51 2.7 137.7 0.45
Sum 303.9 1.00
Basalt with the mode:Basalt with the mode:
1.1. Convert to Convert to weightweight % minerals (W % minerals (Wolol W Wcpxcpx etc.) etc.)
2.2. Use: Use: DDii = = W WAA D Dii
and the table of D values for Rb and Sr in each mineral and the table of D values for Rb and Sr in each mineral to calculate the bulk distribution coefficients: Dto calculate the bulk distribution coefficients: DRbRb = =
0.045 and D0.045 and DSrSr = 0.848 = 0.848
Table 9-3 . Batch Fractionation Model for Rb and Sr
CL/CO = 1/(D(1-F)+F)
DRb DSr
F 0.045 0.848 Rb/Sr0.05 9.35 1.14 8.190.1 6.49 1.13 5.730.15 4.98 1.12 4.430.2 4.03 1.12 3.610.3 2.92 1.10 2.660.4 2.29 1.08 2.110.5 1.89 1.07 1.760.6 1.60 1.05 1.520.7 1.39 1.04 1.340.8 1.23 1.03 1.200.9 1.10 1.01 1.09
3.3. Use the batch melting equation to calculate C Use the batch melting equation to calculate CLL/C/COO
for various values of Ffor various values of F
From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.
4.4. Plot C Plot CLL/C/COO vs. F for each element vs. F for each element
Figure 9-3.Figure 9-3. Change in the concentration Change in the concentration of Rb and Sr in the melt derived by of Rb and Sr in the melt derived by progressive batch melting of a basaltic progressive batch melting of a basaltic rock consisting of plagioclase, augite, rock consisting of plagioclase, augite, and olivine. From Winter (2001) An and olivine. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.
Incremental Batch MeltingIncremental Batch Melting
Calculate batch melting for successive Calculate batch melting for successive batches (same equation)batches (same equation)
Must recalculate DMust recalculate Dii as solids change as as solids change as
minerals are minerals are selectivelyselectively melted (computer) melted (computer)
Fractional CrystallizationFractional Crystallization1. Crystals remain in equilibrium with each 1. Crystals remain in equilibrium with each
melt incrementmelt increment
Rayleigh fractionationRayleigh fractionation The other extreme: separation of each The other extreme: separation of each
crystal as it formed = perfectly continuous crystal as it formed = perfectly continuous fractional crystallization in a magma fractional crystallization in a magma chamberchamber
Rayleigh fractionationRayleigh fractionation
The other extreme: separation of each The other extreme: separation of each crystal as it formed = perfectly continuous crystal as it formed = perfectly continuous fractional crystallization in a magma fractional crystallization in a magma chamber chamber Concentration of some element in the Concentration of some element in the residualresidual
liquid, Cliquid, CLL is modeled by the Rayleigh equation: is modeled by the Rayleigh equation:
CCLL/C/COO = F = F (D -1)(D -1) Rayleigh FractionationRayleigh Fractionation
Other models are used to analyzeOther models are used to analyze Mixing of magmasMixing of magmas Wall-rock assimilationWall-rock assimilation Zone refiningZone refining Combinations of processes Combinations of processes
The Rare Earth Elements (REE)The Rare Earth Elements (REE)
Contrasts and similarities in the D values:Contrasts and similarities in the D values:
All are incompatibleAll are incompatibleTable 9-1 . Partition Coefficients for some commonly used
trace elements in basaltic and andesitic rocks Bulk D calculation
Olivine Opx Cpx Garnet Plag Amph
Rb 0.006 0.02 0.04 0.001 0.1 0.3
Sr 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.001 1.8 0.57
Ba 0.006 0.12 0.07 0.002 0.23 0.31
Ni 14 5 2.6 0.4 0.01 3
Cr 2.1 10 8.4 0.17 10 1.6
La 0.007 0.02 0.08 0.05 0.14 0.27
Ce 0.009 0.02 0.34 0.05 0.14 0.34
Nd 0.009 0.05 0.6 0.07 0.08 0.19
Sm 0.009 0.05 0.9 0.06 0.08 0.91
Eu 0.008 0.05 0.9 0.9 0.1/1.5* 1.01
Tb 0.01 0.05 1 5.6 0.03 1.4
Er 0.013 0.31 1 18 0.08 0.48
Yb 0.014 0.34 0.2 30 0.07 0.97
Lu 0.016 0.11 0.82 35 0.08 0.89
data from Henderson (1982) * Eu3+/Eu2+ Italics are estimated
Rare Earth Elements
Also Note:Also Note:
HREEHREE are less are less incompatibleincompatible
Especially in Especially in garnetgarnet
EuEu can can 2+ 2+ which conc. which conc. in in plagioclaseplagioclase
REE DiagramsREE DiagramsPlots of concentration as the ordinate (y-axis) Plots of concentration as the ordinate (y-axis)
against increasing atomic numberagainst increasing atomic number Degree of compatibility increases from left Degree of compatibility increases from left
to right across the diagramto right across the diagram
Con
cent
rati
onC
once
ntra
tion
La Ce Nd Sm Eu Tb Er Dy Yb LuLa Ce Nd Sm Eu Tb Er Dy Yb Lu
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Atomic Number (Z)
Log (Abundance in CI Chondritic Meteorite)
HHe
Li
Be
B
C
N
O
F
Sc
Fe
Ni
Ne MgSi
SCa
Ar
Ti
PbPtSn Ba
VK
NaAlP
Cl
ThU
Eliminate Eliminate Oddo-Harkins effectOddo-Harkins effect and make y-scale more and make y-scale more functional by normalizing to a standardfunctional by normalizing to a standard
estimates of primordial mantle REEestimates of primordial mantle REE chondrite meteorite concentrationschondrite meteorite concentrations
What would an REE diagram look What would an REE diagram look like for an analysis of a chondrite like for an analysis of a chondrite
meteorite?meteorite?
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
sam
ple
/ch
on
dri
te
L La Ce Nd Sm Eu Tb Er Yb Lu
?
Divide each element in analysis by the Divide each element in analysis by the concentration in a chondrite standardconcentration in a chondrite standard
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
sam
ple
/ch
on
dri
te
L La Ce Nd Sm Eu Tb Er Yb Lu
REE diagrams using batch melting model of REE diagrams using batch melting model of a garnet lherzolite for various values of F:a garnet lherzolite for various values of F:
Figure 9-4.Figure 9-4. Rare Earth Rare Earth concentrations (normalized to concentrations (normalized to chondrite) for melts produced at chondrite) for melts produced at various values of F via melting of a various values of F via melting of a hypothetical garnet lherzolite using hypothetical garnet lherzolite using the batch melting model (equation the batch melting model (equation 9-5). From Winter (2001) An 9-5). From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Hall.
Europium anomalyEuropium anomaly when plagioclase is when plagioclase is a fractionating phenocrysta fractionating phenocryst
oror a residual solid in sourcea residual solid in source
Figure 9-5.Figure 9-5. REE diagram for 10% REE diagram for 10% batch melting of a hypothetical batch melting of a hypothetical lherzolite with 20% plagioclase, lherzolite with 20% plagioclase, resulting in a pronounced negative resulting in a pronounced negative Europium anomaly. From Winter Europium anomaly. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Prentice Hall.
Spider DiagramsSpider DiagramsAn extension of the normalized REE An extension of the normalized REE technique to a broader spectrum of elementstechnique to a broader spectrum of elements
Fig. 9-6. Spider diagram for an alkaline basalt from Gough Island, southern Atlantic. After Sun and MacDonough (1989). In A. D. Saunders and M. J. Norry (eds.), Magmatism in the Ocean Basins. Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ., 42. pp. 313-345.
Chondrite-normalized spider Chondrite-normalized spider diagrams are commonly diagrams are commonly organized by (the author’s organized by (the author’s estimate) of increasing estimate) of increasing incompatibility L incompatibility L R R
Different estimates Different estimates different ordering (poor different ordering (poor standardization)standardization)
MORB-normalized Spider MORB-normalized Spider Separates LIL and HFSSeparates LIL and HFS
Figure 9-7.Figure 9-7. Ocean island basalt Ocean island basalt plotted on a mid-ocean ridge plotted on a mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) normalized basalt (MORB) normalized spider diagram of the type used spider diagram of the type used by Pearce (1983). Data from by Pearce (1983). Data from Sun and McDonough (1989). Sun and McDonough (1989). From Winter (2001) An From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Prentice Hall.
Application of Trace Elements to Igneous Systems
1. Use like major elements on variation diagrams to 1. Use like major elements on variation diagrams to document FX, assimilation, etc. in a suite of rocksdocument FX, assimilation, etc. in a suite of rocks More sensitive More sensitive larger variations as process larger variations as process
continuescontinues
Figure 9-1a.Figure 9-1a. Ni Harker Diagram for Ni Harker Diagram for Crater Lake. From data compiled by Crater Lake. From data compiled by Rick Conrey. From Winter (2001) An Rick Conrey. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Hall.
2. Identification of the source rock or a particular 2. Identification of the source rock or a particular mineral involved in either partial melting or mineral involved in either partial melting or fractional crystallization processesfractional crystallization processes
Table 9-1 . Partition Coefficients for some commonly used trace elements in basaltic and andesitic rocks Bulk D calculation
Olivine Opx Cpx Garnet Plag Amph
Rb 0.006 0.02 0.04 0.001 0.1 0.3
Sr 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.001 1.8 0.57
Ba 0.006 0.12 0.07 0.002 0.23 0.31
Ni 14 5 2.6 0.4 0.01 3
Cr 2.1 10 8.4 0.17 10 1.6
La 0.007 0.02 0.08 0.05 0.14 0.27
Ce 0.009 0.02 0.34 0.05 0.14 0.34
Nd 0.009 0.05 0.6 0.07 0.08 0.19
Sm 0.009 0.05 0.9 0.06 0.08 0.91
Eu 0.008 0.05 0.9 0.9 0.1/1.5* 1.01
Tb 0.01 0.05 1 5.6 0.03 1.4
Er 0.013 0.31 1 18 0.08 0.48
Yb 0.014 0.34 0.2 30 0.07 0.97
Lu 0.016 0.11 0.82 35 0.08 0.89
data from Henderson (1982) * Eu3+/Eu2+ Italics are estimated
Rare Earth Elements
GarnetGarnet concentrates the HREE and fractionates among them concentrates the HREE and fractionates among them
Thus if garnet is in equilibrium with the partial melt (a residual Thus if garnet is in equilibrium with the partial melt (a residual phase in the source left behind) expect a steep (-) slope in REE phase in the source left behind) expect a steep (-) slope in REE and and HREEHREE
Shallow (< 40 Shallow (< 40 km) partial km) partial melting of the melting of the mantle will have mantle will have plagioclaseplagioclase in in the resuduum the resuduum and a Eu and a Eu anomaly will anomaly will resultresult
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
sa
mp
le/c
ho
nd
rite
La Ce Nd Sm Eu Tb Er Yb Lu
67% Ol 17% Opx 17% Cpx
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72
sa
mp
le/c
ho
nd
rite
La Ce Nd Sm Eu Tb Er Yb Lu
57% Ol 14% Opx 14% Cpx 14% Grt
Garnet and Plagioclase effect on HREE
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
sam
ple
/ch
on
dri
te
60% Ol 15% Opx 15% Cpx 10%Plag
La Ce Nd Sm Eu Tb Er Yb Lu
Figure 9-3.Figure 9-3. Change in the concentration Change in the concentration of Rb and Sr in the melt derived by of Rb and Sr in the melt derived by progressive batch melting of a basaltic progressive batch melting of a basaltic rock consisting of plagioclase, augite, rock consisting of plagioclase, augite, and olivine. From Winter (2001) An and olivine. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.
Table 9-6 A brief summary of some particularly useful trace elements in igneous petrology
Element Use as a petrogenetic indicator
Ni, Co, Cr Highly compatible elements. Ni (and Co) are concentrated in olivine, and Cr in spinel andclinopyroxene. High concentrations indicate a mantle source.
V, Ti Both show strong fractionation into Fe-Ti oxides (ilmenite or titanomagnetite). If they behavedifferently, Ti probably fractionates into an accessory phase, such as sphene or rutile.
Zr, Hf Very incompatible elements that do not substitute into major silicate phases (although they mayreplace Ti in sphene or rutile).
Ba, Rb Incompatible element that substitutes for K in K-feldspar, micas, or hornblende. Rb substitutesless readily in hornblende than K-spar and micas, such that the K/Ba ratio may distinguish thesephases.
Sr Substitutes for Ca in plagioclase (but not in pyroxene), and, to a lesser extent, for K in K-feldspar. Behaves as a compatible element at low pressure where plagioclase forms early, butas an incompatible at higher pressure where plagioclase is no longer stable.
REE Garnet accommodates the HREE more than the LREE, and orthopyroxene and hornblende doso to a lesser degree. Sphene and plagioclase accommodates more LREE. Eu2+
is stronglypartitioned into plagioclase.
Y Commonly incompatible (like HREE). Strongly partitioned into garnet and amphibole. Spheneand apatite also concentrate Y, so the presence of these as accessories could have asignificant effect.
Table 9-6.Table 9-6. After Green (1980). Tectonophys., After Green (1980). Tectonophys., 6363, 367-385. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous , 367-385. From Winter (2001) An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice Hall.
Trace elements as a tool to Trace elements as a tool to determine paleotectonic determine paleotectonic
environmentenvironment Useful for rocks in mobile belts that are no Useful for rocks in mobile belts that are no
longer recognizably in their original settinglonger recognizably in their original setting Can trace elements be discriminators of Can trace elements be discriminators of
igneous environment?igneous environment? Approach is Approach is empiricalempirical on on modernmodern occurrences occurrences Concentrate on elements that are immobile Concentrate on elements that are immobile
during low/medium grade metamorphismduring low/medium grade metamorphism
Figure 9-8.Figure 9-8. (a)(a) after Pearce and Cann (1973), after Pearce and Cann (1973), Earth Planet, Sci. Lett., Earth Planet, Sci. Lett., 1919, 290-300, 290-300. . (b)(b) after Pearce (1982) after Pearce (1982) in Thorpe (ed.), in Thorpe (ed.), Andesites: Orogenic andesites and related rocks. Wiley. Chichester. pp. 525-548Andesites: Orogenic andesites and related rocks. Wiley. Chichester. pp. 525-548 , Coish et al. (1986), , Coish et al. (1986), Amer. J. Sci., Amer. J. Sci., 286286, 1-28, 1-28.. (c)(c) after Mullen (1983), after Mullen (1983), Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 6262, 53-62., 53-62.