trademark and unfair comp. boston college law school january 23, 2008 trade dress, functionality

23
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Upload: emerson-loud

Post on 29-Mar-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Trademark and Unfair Comp.

Boston College Law School

January 23, 2008

Trade Dress, Functionality

Page 2: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Trade Dress & Product DesignTrade Dress Product Design

Page 3: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Trade Dress Protection

• Lanham Act § 43(a)– Any person who shall affix, apply, … or use in

connection with any goods or services … a false designation of origin … , and shall cause such goods or services to enter into commerce … shall be liable to a civil action … .

Page 4: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Two Pesos v. Taco Cabana505 U.S. 763 (1992)

Taco Cabana Trade Dress

Page 5: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Two Pesos v. Taco Cabana505 U.S. 763 (1992)

• Findings of the District Court– Taco Cabana has an identifiable trade dress– The trade dress is non-functional– The trade dress is inherently distinctive– The trade dress has not acquired secondary

meaning

Page 6: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Inherently Distinctive?

Page 7: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Inherently Distinctive?

Page 8: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Policy Considerations

Distinctiveness

Generic Descriptive Inherently Distinctive

Low

HighPotential forConfusion

Harm toCompetition

Trade Dress,Trademarks

ProductDesign

Page 9: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Example - Review

Page 10: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Functionality

• Lanham Act § 2(e)(5)– No trademark … shall be refused registration

… unless it --• (e) Consists of a mark which, … (5) comprises any

matter that, as a whole, is functional

Page 11: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

TrafFix v. MDI121 S. Ct. 1255 (2001)

Page 12: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Functionality

• When is something “functional”?– Essential to the use or purpose of the article, or– Affects the cost or quality of the product

• Overall policy consideration– Exclusive use of the feature would put

competitors at a significant non-reputation-related disadvantage

Page 13: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Eco v. Honeywell

Page 14: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Aesthetic Functionality

Page 15: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Au-Tomotive Gold v. VW

Page 16: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Hypos

Page 17: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Hypos

Page 18: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

In re Gibson Guitar Corp.

Page 19: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Functionality - Summary

• When is something “functional”?– Essential to the use or purpose of the article– Affects the cost or quality of the product

• Factors to consider– Existence of utility patent– Statements in advertising– Existence of alternative designs– Cost of manufacturing

Page 20: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Hypothetical

Page 21: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Hypothetical

Page 22: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Patent, Copyright, Trademark

Patent Copyright

TrademarkFunctionality

Doctrine

Useful ArticleDoctrine

ProductDesign

FictionalCharacters

ComputerSoftware

Page 23: Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 23, 2008 Trade Dress, Functionality

Administrative Details

• Next Assignment– Read III.A & B

• Use in Commerce

• Priority and Concurrent Use