trajectory code validation slides 04/12/08
DESCRIPTION
Trajectory Code Validation Slides 04/12/08. Trajectory Simulation – Drag Loss. Results: Compare to Shuttle (2029633 kg GLOM): 107 m/s Titan IV/Centaur (886420 kg GLOM): 156 m/s (from SMAD). Chua – 01/31. Trajectory Optimization. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
AAE 450 Spring 2008
Trajectory Code Validation Slides04/12/08
AAE 450 Spring 2008
Trajectory Simulation – Drag Loss Results:
Compare to Shuttle (2029633 kg GLOM): 107 m/s Titan IV/Centaur (886420 kg GLOM): 156 m/s
(from SMAD)
Trajectory OptimizationChua – 01/31
AAE 450 Spring 2008
Scott BreitengrossFeb 7, 2008
Trajectory group, Delta V Delta V determination, Saturn V
comparison
AAE 450 Spring 2008
Changes and Assumptions All stages masses modified to Saturn
V Engine thrust and exit area modified Burn Time and mass flow rate
modified Stage diameters modified Assume ΔV_Leo is same
Trajectory
*All Saturn V specs provided by http://www.nasm.si.edu/collections/imagery/apollo/saturnV.htm
AAE 450 Spring 2008
ΔV Calculations
Trajectory
Future Work Continue on Trajectory Model
Launch Type ΔV_Grav ΔV_Drag ΔV_Total
Default Inputs 1310 m/s 293 m/s ~15000 m/s
Saturn V Inputs 2362 m/s 36 m/s ~11000 m/s
AAE 450 Spring 2008 6<#>
Brad Ferris02/21/08
Trajectory AnalystModeling Drag
Assistance provided by Jayme Zott, Kyle Donohue
AAE 450 Spring 2008 7<#>
Modeling Assumptions:
– Atmosphere molecular weight is constant
– Angle of Attack is zero Speed of Sound: a = [γRT]1/2
Use Mach Number to get CD
Apply Equation for DragD = CD * q * S
Trajectory Optimization
AAE 450 Spring 2008 8<#>
Validation
Trajectory Optimization
Drag Force v. Mach Number
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 1 2 3 4 5
Mach Number
Dra
g (
N)
W/O Function
Cd Function
With function, notice drag behavior
Over most Mach numbers, drag without function is higher
Figure by Brad Ferris
AAE 450 Spring 2008 9<#>
Orbit parameters Without Function
– 762 / 232710 km(periapsis / apoapsis)
– Eccentricity: 0.942– Delta V Drag: 461
m/s– Delta V Total:
10760 m/s– Steering Angles:
6,-28,-28 deg.
Trajectory Optimization
With Function– 807 / 232477 km
(periapsis / apoapsis)
– Eccentricity: 0.942– Delta V Drag: 384
m/s– Delta V Total:
10672 m/s– Steering Angles:
6,-28,-28 deg.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 10<#>
Drag and Time
Trajectory Optimization
Drag v. Time
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 50 100 150 200 250
Time (s)
Dra
g (
N)
W/O Function
Cd Function
Figure by Brad Ferris
AAE 450 Spring 2008 11
Junichi (Jun) Kanehara02/21/2008Trajectory
Validation of Thrust in the Trajectory Codes
AAE 450 Spring 2008 12
Test #1
Trajectory
Procedure• Set Drag = 0 >> Assume No Atmosphere
• Calculate for each stage,
using the data from Ariane 4, Saturn V and Pegasus
3. Compare with the historical data.
ResultsThe calculated values matched with the historical data!!(3-5 or more significant figures)
Tdt
m
thrust
TV dt
m
Special Thanks to Kevin & Mr. Tsohas for helping us
AAE 450 Spring 2008 13
Test #2
Trajectory
•Full Atmosphere
•Exit Pressure and Exit Area were calculated.
Thrust in Vacuum Condition
Thrust in Sea Level Condition
AAE 450 Spring 2008 14Trajectory
Backup Slides
# of engines: 4 1st Stage 2nd Stage 3rd Stage
Thrust Sea Level 676.9 [kN]
Vacuum 758.5 785 62.7 [kN]
Isp Sea Level 248.5 [s]
Vacuum 278.4 293.5 445.1 [s]
Pressure chamber 5.85 5.85 3.50 [MPa]
Nozzle Expansion Ratio (epsilon) 10.48 30.8 62.5
Ariane 4
Special Thanks to Mr. Tsohas for providing the data
AAE 450 Spring 2008 15Trajectory
Backup Slides Saturn V, First Stage
Thrust Sea Level 6,747.50 [kN]
Vacuum 7,740.50 [kN]
Isp Sea Level 265 [s]
Vacuum 304 [s]
Pressure chamber 7.0 [MPa]
Nozzle Expansion Ratio (epsilon) 16
AAE 450 Spring 2008 16
Solve for and get
111 2
1* *
00
2 21
1 1e
SL e a
pT A p p p A
p
Trajectory
Backup Slides 1 11
* 11
0 0
1 11
2 1e e
e
p pA
A p p
Solve for and get 0
ep
p
*A eA Special Thanks to D.Lattibeaudierefor co-working on prop_test.m
ep
AAE 450 Spring 2008 17
Test #1: Delta_V_Thrust_Total
Ariane 4: 10,120[m/s]
Saturn V: 13,470 [m/s]
Pegasus: 8,360 [m/s]
Backup Slides
18
Amanda Briden2/28/08
APM, Trajectory GroupBallistic Coefficient Analysis ‘measure of its ability to overcome air resistance in flight’1
AAE 450 Spring 2008
19AAE 450 Spring 2008Trajectory
Ballistic Coefficient Definition
SC
mBC
D
wherem - total massCD- drag coefficient f(M) - calculated by Aerothermal solve_cd.mS – reference area; stage diameter
BC: Large Launch Vehicles
transonic regimeM = 1.19 @ t = 70s
out of atmosphere
10s vertical flight
Expect:- Larger BC for more massive launch vehicles
our region
20
Thank you to Jun Kanehara, Elizabeth Harkness, Alan Schwing, and Kevin Kloster for all of their help this week!
BC: Sample MATs Launch Vehicles
end of 1st stageS changes
Conclusions:
- Trends are as expected- Our vehicle cannot easily overcome air resistance
AAE 450 Spring 2008Trajectory
21AAE 450 Spring 2008Trajectory
Future Work Optimize final design cases Write report
References:
1. "Ballistic coefficient." Wikipedia January 18, 2008 February 27, 2008 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_coefficient>.
2. Longuski, Prof. J. "AAE 450 Spacecraft Design Lecture #6." Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
3. Longuski, Prof. J. Ballistic Coefficient interview. February 20, 2008.
4. Kloster, Kevin. Ballistic Coefficient interview. February 20-27, 2008.
Backup Slides
22
Steering Angles Used In Analysis
Vehicle Alt @ end of stage 1 (km) mdot1 (kg/s) tburn1 (s) psi1e (deg) psi2e (deg) Psi3e (deg)
Pegasus 94.43 206.136 73 87 -25 -30
Saturn V 109.75 13,360.24 161 87 40 0
Ariane 4 57 1,112.19 205 87 40 0
SB-HA-DA-DA (8700 km/s)Traj Ver 5.3
194.09 6.847 196.5 -14 -20 -20
SG-SA-DT-DT (9051 km/s)Traj Ver 5.3
71.44 14.208 182.4 0 -10 -10
LG-SA-DT-DT (10,000 km/s)Traj Ver 5.3
56.44 18.391 171.2 34 -26 -26
AAE 450 Spring 2008Trajectory