transactions lect15
TRANSCRIPT
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 1/21
DBMS-BTech-III1
Transactions
Lecture 15
Subject: DBMSPrepared by: Nirali Nanavati
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 2/21
DBMS-BTech-III2
Transactions
A collection of several operations on thedatabase that appears to be a single unitfrom the point of view of the db user.
Examples of transactions Written in high level DML or
programming languages like C++ orJava.
To ensure integrity of data followingproperties of transactions must bemaintained.
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 3/21
DBMS-BTech-III3
ACID
Atomicity. Either all operations of the transaction areproperly reflected in the database or none are.
Consistency. Execution of a transaction in isolationpreserves the consistency of the database.
Isolation. Although multiple transactions may executeconcurrently, each transaction must be unaware of otherconcurrently executing transactions. Intermediatetransaction results must be hidden from other concurrentlyexecuted transactions.
That is, for every pair of transactions T i and T j , itappears to T i that either T j , finished execution before T i started, or T j started execution after T i finished.
Durability. After a transaction completes successfully, thechanges it has made to the database persist, even if thereare system failures.
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 4/21
DBMS-BTech-III4
Transaction Concept
A transaction is a unit of programexecution that accesses and possiblyupdates various data items.
E.g. transaction to transfer Rs.5000from account A to account B:1.read(A)//transfers data from db to buffer
2.A := A –
50003.write(A)
4.read(B )
5.B := B + 5000
6.write(B)
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 5/21
DBMS-BTech-III5
Two main issues to deal with:
Failures of various kinds, such ashardware failures and system crashes
Concurrent execution of multipletransactions
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 6/21
DBMS-BTech-III6
Example of Fund Transfer
Transaction to transfer Rs.5000 fromaccount A to account B:1. read(A)
2. A := A –
50003. write(A)
4. read(B )
5. B := B + 5000
6. write(B) Atomicity requirement
if the transaction fails after step 3 and before step6, money will be “lost” leading to an inconsistent
database state. A + B not preserved.
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 7/21
DBMS-BTech-III7
Solution: the system should ensure thatupdates of a partially executedtransaction are not reflected in the
database.- Atomicity is also ensured by restoring
the old values in case of partialexecution
- Managed by Transaction managementcomponent.
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 8/21
DBMS-BTech-III8
Durability requirement
Once the user has been notified that thetransaction has completed (i.e., the
transfer of the Rs.5000 has taken place),the updates to the database by thetransaction must persist even if there aresoftware or hardware failures.
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 9/21
DBMS-BTech-III9
Solution: Update written to disk beforetransaction completes.
Info about updates must be enough to
reconstruct the updates. Ensured by recovery management
component
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 10/21
DBMS-BTech-III10
Consistency requirement In above example: the sum of A and B is unchanged by the
execution of the transaction
In general, consistency requirements include
• Explicitly specified integrity constraints such asprimary keys and foreign keys
• Implicit integrity constraints• e.g. sum of balances of all accounts, minus sum of
loan amounts must equal value of cash-in-hand
A transaction must see a consistent database.
During transaction execution the database may betemporarily inconsistent.
When the transaction completes successfully the databasemust be consistent
• Erroneous transaction logic can lead to inconsistency
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 11/21
DBMS-BTech-III11
Isolation requirement
If between steps 3 and 6, another transaction T2 isallowed to access the partially updated database, itwill see an inconsistent database (the sum A + B willbe less than it should be).
T1 T2
1. read(A)
2. A := A – 50
3. write(A)read(A), read(B),
print(A+B)4. read(B )
5. B := B + 50
6. write(B
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 12/21
DBMS-BTech-III12
Isolation can be ensured trivially byrunning transactions serially
that is, one after the other.
However, executing multiple transactionsconcurrently has significant benefits, aswe will see later.
Concurrency control component
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 13/21
DBMS-BTech-III13
Transaction States
Active – the initial state; the transaction stays inthis state while it is executing
Partially committed – after the final statementhas been executed.
Aborted – after the transaction has been rolledback and the database restored to its state prior tothe start of the transaction.
Committed – after successful completion. Toundo a commited transaction; we need to executea compensating transaction.(This is theresponsibility of the user.)
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 14/21
DBMS-BTech-III14
Terminated – if it has either commited oraborted.Assumption:no loss of data from disk
Failed – the transaction cannot proceed with its
normal execution. In that case it is rolledback/aborted state. Done by the recoveryscheme.
2 options:
restart the transaction
• can be done only if no internal logicalerror
kill the transaction
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 15/21
DBMS-BTech-III
15
Contd…
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 16/21
DBMS-BTech-III
16
We must be cautious when dealingwith observable external writes, such
as writes to a terminal or printer. Must be done after the transaction
has commited.
E.g dispensing cash – alternative is acompensating transaction
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 17/21
DBMS-BTech-III
17
Implementation of Atomicityand Durability The recovery-management component of a database
system implements the support for atomicity anddurability.
E.g. the shadow-database scheme:
Copy of the db called the shadow copy is made
all updates are made on a new copy of thedatabase
• db_pointer is made to point to the updated
copy after• all updated pages have been flushed to disk.
• Old copy is then deleted.
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 18/21
DBMS-BTech-III
18
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 19/21
DBMS-BTech-III
19
db_pointer always points to the current consistent copyof the database.
It handles transaction and system failure before dbpointer is written to disk.
In case transaction fails, old consistent copy pointedto by db_pointer can be used, and the new copycan be deleted.
In case of system failure, it will restart and see no
new changes.- Imp restriction: db-pointer is updated atomically. Wecan do this by storing atomic pointer at beginning of ablock.
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 20/21
DBMS-BTech-III
20
Example: Text editing session
The shadow-database scheme: Assumes that only one transaction is active at a
time.
Assumes disks do not fail
Useful for text editors(rename and deleteoperation - atomic),
• extremely inefficient for large databases(why?)
Does not handle concurrent transactions
8/3/2019 Transactions Lect15
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/transactions-lect15 21/21
DBMS-BTech-III
21
Thank You