transformation work group (twg) meeting presentation (06-16-2006)
TRANSCRIPT
Mental Health Transformation Project
June 16, 2006
Transformation Work Group
Introduction and Logistics• Welcome• Logistics• The purpose of today’s meeting is to consider
and adopt the strategies for implementing the identified outcomes
Today’s Agenda
10:00 – 10:15 Welcome and Next steps 10:15 – 10:30 Employment and Housing Goals for
CMHP10:30 – 11:30 Resource Inventory / Needs Assessment 11:30 – 12:00 Lunch12:00 – 3:45 Presentation & Adoption of Strategies3:45 – 4:00 Next steps
OVERVIEW
BACKGROUND
MHTP Overview
SUBCOMMITTEESHold public input meetingsDevelop priority outcomes
TASK GROUPS identify strategies, initiatives, and alternatives to reach outcomes
DRAFT CMHP7/15
Final Comprehensive Mental Health State Plan
09-30-2006
Transformation Process: Year One of Implementation
TWG prioritizes outcomes and strategies
Final Review by Governor’s Office
Resource Inventory5-15-2006
Needs Assessment
5-15-2006
`
OUTCOMES
STRATEGIES
You Are Here
Schedule OverviewSchedule Overview
Jan Feb March April May June Aug July Sept
Public Input21 Subcommittee sessions
20 Listening sessions
Surveys distributed statewide
TWG Reviews/ Approves Outcomes
Subcommittees Prioritizes Outcomes
Task groups prepare strategies
TWG Reviews/ Prioritizes strategies
Sterling prepares draft CMHP
RDA conducts needs assessment and Resource Inventory
CMHP
DRAFT
TWG reviews draft CMHP
Submit CMHP to Governor
Deliver CMHP to SAMHSA
Task groups share strategies with subcommittees and modify if needed
Jan Feb March April May June Aug July SeptJan Feb March April May June Aug July Sept
Public Input21 Subcommittee sessions
24 Listening sessions
Surveys distributed statewide
TWG Reviews/ Approves Outcomes
Subcommittees Prioritizes Outcomes
Task groups prepare strategies
TWG Reviews/ Prioritizes strategies
Sterling prepares draft CMHP
RDA conducts needs assessment and Resource Inventory
CMHP
DRAFT
CMHP
DRAFT
TWG reviews draft CMHP
Submit CMHP to Governor
Deliver CMHP to SAMHSA
Task groups share strategies with subcommittees and modify if needed
Employment and Housing GoalsPresentation
Lynn Davison & Lynnae Ruttledge
Resource Inventory / Needs AssessmentPresentation
Liz Kohlenberg Eric BrunsJudy Hall Dennis McBride
• Each Task Group will be presenting their work to the TWG.
– The TWG will be asked to decide whether the task groups’ proposals are accepted for inclusion into the CMHP
– Discussion should focus on whether the TWG agrees with the strategies and/or the principles. Key questions include:
• Are these the “right” strategies and/or principles? Is this an appropriate framework?
• Are there any specific strategies that we cannot live with?• Are there others that may be needed?
Presentation of Strategies
• Each of the task groups developed a set of overarching, or broad-based principles as a framework for developing their specific strategies.
• These will be highlighted by each of the task groups and if approved will guide their work in subsequent years
• Other strategies are specifically geared towards one or more of the outcomes approved at the April 21st TWG meeting
• Each of the Task Groups believes that their work has just begun
• The timelines for developing the first cut were very aggressive. In some cases, there was not enough known to form detailed strategies.
Presentation of Strategies
Task Group Presentations
Evidence-, Consensus-Based/Promising and Emerging
Practices Task Group
Chair: Mark Snowden, MD, MPHAssociate Professor
UW Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Decision Point• Does the TWG accept the scope of the Task Group’s
strategies as set forth in their definitions of evidence-based, promising, and emerging practices, and system strategies?
• Does the TWG accept the strategies as proposed by the ECBPEP Task Group?
• Are there any strategies that the TWG cannot accept?• Are there other strategies that should be included?
Evidence- Consensus-Based, Promising, Emerging Practices
Fiscal Task Group
Chair: Rick Weaver, MAPresident/CEO
Central Washington Comprehensive Mental Health
Decision Point• Does the TWG accept the approach proposed by the
Fiscal Task Group to defer detailed strategies and instead define principles to help determine detailed strategies in Year 2 when more information is known?
• Are these the right principles?
Fiscal Task Group
IT Task Group
Co-Chairs: Katie Weaver Randall, MA
Research Associate, Mental Health Division Washington Institute for Mental Illness and Research
Liz Kohlenberg, PhDDirector, DSHS Research and Data Analysis Division
Decision Point• Does the TWG agree that the state should adopt
strategies that will support linked and/or integrated data across systems?
• Does the TWG agree that the state should further explore ways to make data from multiple providers about encounters with individual consumers, available to those consumers and their multiple providers and case managers, "on the ground" in "real time"?
IT Task Group
Decision Point• Does the TWG agree that the state should further explore the
feasibility of a Global Consumer Information Center consumer level record for both public and privately funded mental health services?
• Does the TWG agree that the state should further explore the other strategies as proposed by the IT Task Group? Are there any strategies proposed that the TWG would prefer we not pursue at this time? Are there other IT strategies that should be explored?
• Does the TWG want a more detailed IT implementation proposal -- with resource estimates and an implementation timeline? When do they need that?
IT Task Group
Cultural Competence Task Group
Chair: Emilio Vela, Jr. Treatment and Prevention Policy AnalystDivision of Alcohol and Substance Abuse
Cultural CompetenceDecision Point• Does the TWG accept the proposed overarching strategy to
establish an Interdepartmental Coordinating Council on Cultural Competence?
• Does the TWG accept the supporting strategies as proposed by the Cultural Competence Task Group?
• Are there any strategies that the TWG cannot accept?• Are there other strategies that should be included?
Evaluation Task Group
Chair: Judy Hall, Ph.DResearch Director
Mental Health Division, HRSA
Evaluation
Decision Point• Does the TWG accept the Evaluation Recommendations
proposed by the Evaluation Task Group?• Are there any of these recommendations that the TWG
cannot accept?• Are there other recommendations that should be
included?
Social Marketing
Social Marketing
Chair: Heidi KellerDepartment of Health
Social Marketing
Decision Point• Does the TWG accept the research and design approach
proposed by the Social Marketing Task Group?• Are there any other target behaviors that the TWG
believes should be incorporated?• Are there other change agents who should be included?
Wrap Up
Questions?
Wrap Up• Sterling Associates will work with the Project Team to
prepare the Comprehensive Mental Health Plan (CMHP)– The draft plan will be posted for public viewing
• August 1: TWG members will receive the draft CMHP for review
• August 4: TWG will meet to make final modifications and approve the CMHP– Once approved, the CMHP will be submitted to the Governor’s
office for review
• September 30: CMHP due to SAMHSA
Wrap Up
• Final comments or questions• Please complete and return the evaluation
Thank you!