transport - exec summary · bl bill of lading bot build operate transfer cagr cumulative average...
TRANSCRIPT
National Key Result Area (NKRA)
Transport Lab Executive Summary
1
Summary▪ Tanzania is in a position to be a natural transport and logistics gateway for Central and Cast Africa:
– Good geographical position i.e. surrounded by 6 landlocked countries, – Strong starting point i.e. DSM port is capturing 14% of import and export of neighboring countries– Healthy domestic growth i.e. expected GDP growth of 8% p.a.
▪ However, current performance indicates that the transport sector is not fulfilling its potential:– Idle and waiting time makes 76% of total cargo dwell time at DSM port
– Volume of freight transported by central railway declined from 1.5 Mil to 0.2 Mil tons in the last ten years– One third of road travel time is caused by multiple non-transport related barriers and activities
▪ The recommendations developed will help to increase transit capacity along the central corridor from 1 Mil tons to 5 Mil tons by 2015, by:– Increasing cargo throughput at the DSM port from 12.1 Mil tons to 18.0 Mil tons by 2015– Increasing railway capacity from 0.2 Mil tons to 3 Mil tons by 2015– Reducing travel time from 3.5 days to 2.5 days by 2015
▪ Based on the approach of extracting the most of today’s infrastructure, the key recommendations are:– Port: enhance operational efficiency, i.e. improve documentation process, port community system, 24X7 operational
hours)and maximize spatial efficiency, i.e. single traffic flow in the port, reallocate space and improve layout– Railway: improve institutional setup (i.e. TRL as only operator on railway until end of 2105), increase availability of
rolling stocks (i.e. rehab of locomotives and wagons), and strengthen demand-driven business model
– Road: debottleneck critical roads (i.e. widening bridges and roads ) and reduce non-tariff barriers (i.e. reduce number of police check points, stops at weigh bridges and TRA check points)
▪ The focus is set on initiatives that can be implemented until the end 0f 2015 – within these initiatives, quick-wins (implementable within the next 6-8 months) have been identified: introduce new SOP for cargo collection/delivery at the port (reduce cargo dwell time), institute 24x7 operating hours (reduce ship turn around time), initiate TRA electronic tracking system for trucks and reduce police check points along central corridor road (reduces travel time)
▪ A total budget of TZS 3.8 trillion is required to implement all the initiatives, in which 67% will require public sector funding
2
AbbreviationAbbreviation Full nameAC Asphalt ConcreteASYCUDA Automated System for Customs DataBil BillionBL Bill of LadingBOT Build Operate TransferCAGR Cumulative Average Growth RateCCTV Closed-Circuit TelevisionCEO Chief Executive OfficerCEP Centre of Economic Prosperity, DSMCFA Clearing and Forwarding AgentCFS Cargo Freight StationCRD Credit Reference DatabankD&DO Declaration & Delivery OrderDG Director GeneralDO Delivery OrderDRC Democratic Republic of CongoDSM Dar es SalaamDWT Deadweight tonnageECTS Electronic Cargo Tracking SystemEIR Equipment Interchange ReceipteSWS e-Single Window SystemGDP Gross Domestic ProductHS Harmonized SystemICD Inland Container DepotIDF Import Declaration FormILO International Labour OrganizationJICA Japan International Cooperation AgencyJNI Julius Nyerere International AirportKOJ Kurasini Oil JettyKPH Kilometres per HourKPI Key Performance IndicatorLC Letter of CreditLCU Local Currency UnitLoco LocomotiveLoLo Load On Load OffM&E Mechanical & Engineering
Abbreviation Full nameMeTLMilMOTMROMSCLNKRAOGDP.A.PADPCSPDBPOPCPPPR&DRAHCORMGRoRoRTGSOPSUMATRASWOTTANROADSTANSADTAZARATEUTICTSToRTPATRATrilTRLTTFATZSUNCTADVPN
Mohammed Enterprize Tanzania LtdMillionMinistry of TransportMaintenance, Repair and OverhaulMarine Services Company LtdNational Key Result AreaOther Government DepartmentPer AnnumPre-Assessment DeclarationPort Community SystemPresident's Delivery BureauPresident's Office, Planning CommissionPublic Private PartnershipResearch & DevelopmentRail Asset Holding CompanyRail Mounted GantryRoll In Roll OutRubber Tyred GantryStandard Operating ProceduresSurface and Marine Transport Regulatory Authority Strength Weakness Opportunity Threat analysisTanzania Natinal Roads AgencyTanzania Single Administrative DocumentTanzania Zambia Railway AuthorityTwenty Foot Equivalent UnitTanzania International Container Terminal ServicesTerms of ReferenceTanzania Port AuthorityTanzania Revenue AuthorityTrillionTanzania Railway LimitedTransit Transportation Facilitation AgencyTanzania ShillingsUnited Nations Conference on Trade and DevelopmentVirtual Private Network
3
AgendaTransport Lab – a short background on how this report has been created
Tanzania’s transport sector – a natural logistics gateway to East and Central Africa
Challenges and issues – what is keeping Tanzania from fulfilling its potential
Our vision: 5 million tons of transit – where we want to be in 2015
Big ideas in each sector – the way we achieve these targets
Quick wins, strategic directions and key enablers –low hanging fruits and long term plans
Budget requirements – what resources are needed to get there
Delivery – how do we ensure successful implementation
Communication – proposed story for open day with the public
Stakeholder sign off – consent by implementers on the outcome of the Transport Lab
4
43 members from 27 agencies have spent 9,800 hours…
SOURCE: Transport Lab
CC-TTFA RAHCORoads Fund Board
TANROADSTRL TrademarkEast Africa
TRAPolice
SUMATRA TPAPOPCMinistryof Transport
Ministryof Finance
Ministryof Works
Ministry ofIndustry
and Trade
Ministry of Infrastructure & Communication
MSCL TASAAPMO-RALG
identified actions1,200
hours of work9,800
initiatives65
agencies27
members43
TICTSWorld Bank World FoodProgramme
JICA MaerskUFISHI Consult
CIDAT TAFFA
5
… on identifying and prioritizing issues, finding and challenging solutions, and developing detailed recommendations
5240682- 49-Tourism lab kickoff-1Jun10- v3-R R- KLP.ppt
Eight high impact ideas identified from list of all initiatives proposed
Job creation potentia l
Lo Hi
Lo
HiImpact
1
2
4
Duty Free M'sia
IR
Med : >5,000
Med : >RM 1Bn
Prem ium Outlets
5KL Shopping
district
6Biodiversity
Hub
Cultural / Heritage7
8Events
9Cruise
10Entertainm ent Hub
11Connectiv ity
123GA
13 HSR (to be done by Greater KL team )
x Hi gh im pact
x Other
3MICE
5240682- 49-Tourism lab kickoff-1Jun10- v3-R R- KLP.ppt
Eight high impact ideas identified from list of all initiatives proposed
Job creation potentia l
Lo Hi
Lo
HiImpact
1
2
4
Duty Free M'sia
IR
Med : >5,000
Med : >RM 1Bn
Prem ium Outlets
5KL Shopping
district
6Biodiversity
Hub
Cultural / Heritage7
8Events
9Cruise
10Entertainm ent Hub
11Connectiv ity
123GA
13 HSR (to be done by Greater KL team )
x Hi gh im pact
x Other
3MICE
12070610- DS IJ visit #2-v3.ppt
Duty Free Malaysia: remove import duties for selected goods to enhance our competitive position as a shopping destination
Description
• Overall description of idea:– Duty Free Malaysia initiative seeks to enhance Malaysia’s value proposit ion as a l eading shopping dest inat ion by ensuri ng overall shopping offer
is competitive versus regional com peti tors; Today the average tourist v isit ing Mal aysi a spends ~26% on shopping vs. 53% to 57% for S ingapore and Hong Kong respect ive
– The m ai n proposal is to remove import dut ies for goods within selected categories
• Rati onale for pursui ng idea/opportunity:– To make M alaysia a top destination for shopping i n this region by making Malaysia more competit ive versus Hong Kong, Singapore and Dubai– To enhance tourist yi el ds by (i ) encouraging current mix of tourist to spend more and (ii) over t ime to at tract higher qualit y (i.e. higher spending)
tourist f rom India, China and other SEA countries which are key growth markets in the regi on– To at tract more range and wider set of brands in Malaysi a
Enablers required
• No di rect enablers requi red• Indirect: need to miti gate negative impact on
local m anufacturers by support ing them to move up val ue chai n to better com pete against m ore competit ive foreign products
Key agencies involved
• Mi nistry of Fi nance• Mi nistry of Trade & Indust ry• Mi nistry of Domesti c Trade & Consumer
Af fairs
Implementation feasibility
• Likelihood of finding private sector investor:
• Execut ion complexity:
Expected impact
• Financial im pact (2020):– expected revenue impact : +RM22Bn– expected GNI impact +RM 10Bn
• Soci o-econom ic– job creation: 345k
Potential benchmark
• Any gl obal benchmark:– Dubai– Si ngapore– Hong Kong
Key risks
• Impact on local manufacturers, especially SME business
• Potent ial for net government revenue shortfall
12070610- DS IJ visit #2-v3.ppt
Duty Free Malaysia: remove import duties for selected goods to enhance our competitive position as a shopping destination
Description
• Overall description of idea:– Duty Free Malaysia initiative seeks to enhance Malaysia’s value proposit ion as a l eading shopping dest inat ion by ensuri ng overall shopping offer
is competitive versus regional com peti tors; Today the average tourist v isit ing Mal aysi a spends ~26% on shopping vs. 53% to 57% for S ingapore and Hong Kong respect ive
– The m ai n proposal is to remove import dut ies for goods within selected categories
• Rati onale for pursui ng idea/opportunity:– To make M alaysia a top destination for shopping i n this region by making Malaysia more competit ive versus Hong Kong, Singapore and Dubai– To enhance tourist yi el ds by (i ) encouraging current mix of tourist to spend more and (ii) over t ime to at tract higher qualit y (i.e. higher spending)
tourist f rom India, China and other SEA countries which are key growth markets in the regi on– To at tract more range and wider set of brands in Malaysi a
Enablers required
• No di rect enablers requi red• Indirect: need to miti gate negative impact on
local m anufacturers by support ing them to move up val ue chai n to better com pete against m ore competit ive foreign products
Key agencies involved
• Mi nistry of Fi nance• Mi nistry of Trade & Indust ry• Mi nistry of Domesti c Trade & Consumer
Af fairs
Implementation feasibility
• Likelihood of finding private sector investor:
• Execut ion complexity:
Expected impact
• Financial im pact (2020):– expected revenue impact : +RM22Bn– expected GNI impact +RM 10Bn
• Soci o-econom ic– job creation: 345k
Potential benchmark
• Any gl obal benchmark:– Dubai– Si ngapore– Hong Kong
Key risks
• Impact on local manufacturers, especially SME business
• Potent ial for net government revenue shortfall
Gathering of issues
Prioritization of issues
Developing solutions
Developing detail action plan
Identification of issues
Structuring problems into addressable breakdowns
Prioritization based on▪ Time horizon
(2015)▪ Impact vs.
ease of implementation
▪ Sustainability/ criticality
Discussion of possible solutions
Prioritization of solutions
February, 2013 April, 2013
250identified issues
in 3 sectors
17prioritized issues
in 3 sectors
65 initiatives
from 3 sectors
1,200 action items
from 3 sectors
8 weeks
SOURCE: Transport Lab
Finalization
Regular syndication with stakeholders
Detailed action plan with budget, timeline and clear responsibilities
Finalization and documentation of report
Preparation for cabinet workshop
Lab preparation
Gathering base-line information
6
AgendaTransport Lab – a short background on how this report has been created
Tanzania’s transport sector – a natural logistics gateway to East and Central Africa
Challenges and issues – what is keeping Tanzania from fulfilling its potential
Our vision: 5 million tons of transit – where we want to be in 2015
Big ideas in each sector – the way we achieve these targets
Quick wins, strategic directions and key enablers –low hanging fruits and long term plans
Budget requirements – what resources are needed to get there
Delivery – how do we ensure successful implementation
Communication – proposed story for open day with the public
Stakeholder sign off – consent by implementers on the outcome of the Transport Lab
7
Tanzania is in a position to be a natural transport and logistics gateway to East and Central Africa
1
Uganda Kenya
Tanzania
Burundi
RwandaDemocratic Republic
of the Congo
Zimbabwe
ZambiaMalawi
Mozambique
Geographical position
Surrounded by 6 neighboring landlocked countries showing strong economic development
Transit demand expected to increase from 2.7 to 9.8 Mil tons by 2030
Domestic growth
Tanzania experienced high domestic growth (7% p.a. from 2005 –10) and expects to grow 8% p.a.
Expected increase in demand for domestic transport by 16% in 2020
4 – 8%GDP growth p.a.
2005 2010 2020
16%
Strong starting point
Dar es Salaam port captures 14% of import and export of its neighboring countries in 2012
Dar es Salaam port has increased its throughput from 7.4 in 2007 to 12.1 Mil tons in 2012
2
3
SOURCE: Ministry of Transport, JICA 2012, World Bank Indicators
8
The central corridor is one of the two corridors connecting Dar es Salaam port with Tanzania’s neighboring landlocked countries
Central corridor
Northern corridor
Dar corridor
1%
3%
3%
15%
1%
Uganda
Rwanda
Burundi
DemocraticRepublic of Congo
8%
Zambia
Malawi
64%
The central corridor is one of two corridors connecting the Dar esSalaam Port with Tanzania’s hinterland and its neighboring countries
▪ The central corridor connects the Dar es Salaam Port withUganda, Rwanda, Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania’s northern hinterland
▪ The Dar corridor connects the port with Zambia, Malawi and Tanzania’s southern hinterland
The central corridor competes for being the natural gateway for Burundi, Rwanda and partly Uganda with the northern corridor, connecting Kenya’s Mombasa Port with its neighboring landlocked countries
SOURCE: TRA (customs data), TPA (transit, import, export and destinations)
9
AgendaTransport Lab – a short background on how this report has been created
Tanzania’s transport sector – a natural logistics gateway to East and Central Africa
Challenges and issues – what is keeping Tanzania from fulfilling its potential
Our vision: 5 million tons of transit – where we want to be in 2015
Big ideas in each sector – the way we achieve these targets
Quick wins, strategic directions and key enablers –low hanging fruits and long term plans
Budget requirements – what resources are needed to get there
Delivery – how do we ensure successful implementation
Communication – proposed story for open day with the public
Stakeholder sign off – consent by implementers on the outcome of the Transport Lab
10
However, current performance indicates that the transport sector may not be fulfilling its potential
1.4
1.5 0.1
3.5
BreakdownQueue time
0.5
Rest time
Traveltime
Total
0.20.5
1.11.5
2011200820052002
High idle and waiting time contributing to long cargo dwell time due to lack of coordination between key actors
Heavy congestion leading to long travel time due to multiple non-transport related barriers and activities
Cargo dwell timeDays
Freight volume transportedMillion tons
Travel time central corridorDays
87%
67%Idle and
waiting time
Decline freight volume
30%Delay time
Dar es Salaam Port
Central railway line
Roads along central corridor
Rapidly declining freight volume due to outgrown infrastructure combined with structural under investment leading to a continuous deterioration of assets
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
1
9
Cargo dis-charge
Documen-tation and payment
Dwell time
2
Idle and waiting time
6
11SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
Inadequately skilled human capital for critical roles such as marine pilots, regulatory enforcement
Insufficient capability of planning, analysis and negotiations of PPP
Lack of information for port users on processes and procedures
Unavailability of transparent information on port operations
Institutional administrationOperations
Cumbersome processes involving manual procedures
Inefficient operational process for collection & delivery of goods
Delay in documentation processes due to manual procedures
Lack of integration and harmonized processes causing delays
Operational processes for collection and delivery of goods incentivizing storage of goods in the port
Uneconomical use of tariffs to penaliseinefficient behaviour in expediting delivery
Layout of the port does not allow efficient movement of cargo & specialized terminals due to multiple obstructions
Limitation of platform capacity for rail cargo loading
Limitation of road access causing congestion at port entrance and gates
Infrastructure
Outdated port layout
Poor road/rail access
Low human resource capacity
Poor information environment
Dar es Salaam port is not tapping its potential due to operational inefficiencies, outdated layout and poor information environment
12
The railway central line is faced with poor infrastructure, low availability of rolling stock and an undefined institutional setup
Low availability (<50%) of rolling stock: on average out of 44 mainline loco-motives only 6 are available for freight transport
Low level of maintenance leads to frequent break-downs of locomotives (every 1200 km)
Unclear institutional set-up leads to dependency on government funds
Lower poundage rails are old (100 years), partly broken, badly maintained and source of frequent accidents
Defected rails lead to high number of tracks (861 km) with speed restrictions (10-30 kph)
Infrastructure
Poor track condition and maintenance
Low availability and reliability of rolling stock
Institutional setupOperations/rolling stock
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
Non-functional and outdated concession agreement (e.g. unclear status of TRL)
Unclear delineation of responsibilities (e.g. maintenance)
No access to external funds due to unclear legal status/ framework
72% of bridges have low axle load (10-12 tons) and impedes purchase of high productivity rolling stock
28 bridges in condition “E” (worst classification) are in a condemning state and can bring the railway to stand still
Low axle load and life expired bridges decrease travel speed
TRL and RAHCO have been underfunded for several years
TRL’s business model is not demand- and revenue-driven
Today’s cargo and finance monitoring system outdated
No sustainable and profitable business model
13
Road travel time along central corridor is high due to inadequate capacity, multiple checkpoints and poor road safety environment
Road unworthy trucks and unskilled truck drivers operating on the road cause accidents that leads to traffic congestion
Lack of road markings, signs and non-standard speed bumps
No regulation for commercial and private vehicle to use access roads during peak hours
Lack of Safety Act and a lead agency to enforce
Safety & SecurityInfrastructure
Inadequate capacity of port’s access roads
Inadequate capacity of border post facilities
Limited facilities (parking lots, access to ports) causing trucks stopping on regular roads - choking the traffic flow
Limited facilities (parking lots, access to border posts)
Slow operations at the border posts due to lack of adequate supporting equipment
Too many customs and police checkpoints
Slow weighing process at weighbridge stations
High number of random police stops
Weak overloading control reduces road lifespan
Inadequate maintenance funds and lack of supervision
Too many check-points
Poor main-tenance on road surface
Poor road safety environ-ment
Lack traffic manage-ment system
Operations
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
14
AgendaTransport Lab – a short background on how this report has been created
Tanzania’s transport sector – a natural logistics gateway to East and Central Africa
Challenges and issues – what is keeping Tanzania from fulfilling its potential
Our vision: 5 million tons of transit – where we want to be in 2015
Big ideas in each sector – the way we achieve these targets
Quick wins, strategic directions and key enablers –low hanging fruits and long term plans
Budget requirements – what resources are needed to get there
Delivery – how do we ensure successful implementation
Communication – proposed story for open day with the public
Stakeholder sign off – consent by implementers on the outcome of the Transport Lab
15
The transport lab has developed recommendations across the supply chain of the central corridor and aspires to increase transit capacity to 5 million tons by 2015
Million tons throughput
1818 Million tons throughput
12.1
Million tons freight
0.2
Days of travel time
3.52.52.5Days
33 Million tons freight
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
16
AgendaTransport Lab – a short background on how this report has been created
Tanzania’s transport sector – a natural logistics gateway to East and Central Africa
Challenges and issues – what is keeping Tanzania from fulfilling its potential
Our vision: 5 million tons of transit – where we want to be in 2015
Big ideas in each sector – the way we achieve these targets
Quick wins, strategic directions and key enablers –low hanging fruits and long term plans
Budget requirements – what resources are needed to get there
Delivery – how do we ensure successful implementation
Communication – proposed story for open day with the public
Stakeholder sign off – consent by implementers on the outcome of the Transport Lab
17
Key recommendations for implementation until 2015 have beendeveloped for all 3 transport sectors…
Enhance operational
efficiencyMaximize spatial
efficiency
Strengthen institutional
administration
Debottleneck critical roads
Eliminate infra-structure and operational roadblocks
Improve and enforce road
safety standards
Get the trains rolling
Make it profitableand sustainable
Get the institu-tional setup right
Dar esSalaam Port
1
Central railway line
2
Roads along central corridor
3
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
Upgrade lake ports
Infrastructure modernization
18SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
… which are achieved by a number of detailed initiatives
Port
Road
Rail
60.010.01.210.02.884.0
Rest Time (Reduced)
Improving safety
Reducing non-tariff barriers
Widening road & lane enhancement
Total journey time
New travel trime in 2015
3.0
1.6
Total volume in 2015
Improvemaintenance
0.5
Adapt org. set-up
0.2
Demand-driven bus-iness model
0.5
Improve availabilityrolling stock
Today’svolume
0.2
18.012.1
Cargothroughput 2015
Infrastructure modernization
Maximize spatial efficiency
0.6
Strengtheninstitutionaladministration
1.81.71.8
Enhance operational efficiency
Cargo throughput 2012
Cargo throughput (Dar es Salaam Port)Million tons
Journey timeHours
Freight capacity on central line (TRL)Million tons
1
2
3
Key enablers
▪ New inst. set-up for all actors in railway sector
▪ Infrastructure rehabilitation
Key enablers
▪ Upgrade lake port
▪ Continuous plan for capacity building
Key enablers
▪ Enactment of Road Safety Act
▪ Establishment of road safety lead agency
19
For the first time, solutions for the most critical issues were co-developed from a joint transport perspective by all relevant stakeholders
§ Establishment of a joint programme involving all stakeholders including top leadership commitment§ Regular and constant syndications with leadership and on-the-ground
implementers§ Regular Steering Committee meetings (involving all stakeholders) as
an on-going governance mechanism to address interface bottlenecks along the central corridor after end of labs
Development of quality solutions
§ Extracting the most out of today’s operations and infrastructure, selected immediate investment to address major capacity bottlenecks and embedding an effective institutional framework§ Ensuring recommendations are sustainable
Breaking the silos working culture
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
§ Recommendations were co-developed by implementing experts with private sector involvement§ All implementers are aligned to the needs of the transport sector§ High quality solutions have been developed by combining knowledge and
experience from various transport actors
Approach for developing solutions
20
The Dar es Salaam port will undergo operational and infrastructure modernization to increase efficiency and capacity1
Enhance operational efficiency
A
▪ Improve and transform operational processes (e.g. ICD transfer, stuffing/ stripping, bagging, stacking) to penalize inefficiencies
▪ Implementation of port community system to integrate stakeholder systems
▪ Institute 24x7 work-ing hours in the port
Maximize spatial efficiency
B
▪ Reallocate space and improve port layout by demolishing shed 2-7 and relocating TICTS office
▪ Institute single flow of traffic and single entry/exit points
▪ Upgrade road access to dual carriageways and upgrade rail access infrastructure
Strengthen institu-tional administration
C
▪ Enhance professionalism and information transparency
▪ Increase capacity building and workforce enhancement for critical roles
▪ Strengthen PPP capacity and coordination
Infrastructure modernization
E
▪ Construct new RoRoterminals and upgrade port handling capacity e.g. grain silo handling and linkages
▪ Building blocks for long- term infrastruc-ture transformation e.g channel dredging & widening, berth strengthening & modernization
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
Upgrade lake port capacity
▪ Upgrade Kigoma port handling capacity by rehabilitating existing Rail Mounted Gantry (RMG)
▪ Upgrade MwanzaSouth facilities by rehabilitating RoRowagon ferry terminal and introducing LoLooperations.
▪ Prioritize repair works for critical marine services vessels
D
21
Port: Recommendations and initiatives
Budget in TZS billions
A3 Implementation of a Port Community System to integrate stakeholder systems to support a single window system & improving information environment
Apr 13 – Apr 1431.5
TimeBudget
A1 Introduce new standard operating procedures, review of KPIs and tariffs for berth operations and cargo collection / delivery at the port to transform operational processes
Apr 13 – Dec 130.13
A2 Implement measures to institute 24x7 working hours in the port Apr 13 – Aug130.035
B1 Removal & relocation of unutilised facilities for space creation Jul13 –Nov1424.2
B2 Relocation of office building (TICTS) for operational & administrative separation Jul13 – Feb 150.41
Relocate & institute scanning processes at entry & exit pointsB4 Jul13 – Oct 145.97
Improve spatial layout by instituting one-way traffic in the port & improving access and entry gates
B3 Apr 13 – Jun 1410.3
Construction of new RoRo terminal at Gerezani CreekE1 Apr 13 – Dec 15107
Upgrade capacity of dry bulk facilities (grain silo) & conveyor linkagesE2 Apr 13 – Apr 1532
Channel dredging & widening, Berth 1-7 modernisation, Kisarawe inland cargo freight station, Berth 13-14 & KOJ infrastructure
F Jul 13 – Dec 182,351
Upgrade rail links & construct rail looping system within the portB6 Jul13 – Nov 1412.7
Upgrade of rail handling equipment at the port with Rubber Tyred Gantry B5 Jul 13 – Aug 144.38
Enhance operational efficiency
Maximize spatial efficiency
Infrastructure modernization
Transforming operational processes
Improving road access & traffic at the port
Upgrading port infrastructure to increase handling capacity
Modernisation of the port as building blocks for the long term
Upgrading rail access and infrastructure
Implementation of a Port Community System
Reallocating space and improving port layout
A
B
Rehabilitate facilities and equipments at Mwanza South PortD2 Jul13 – Dec 144.13
Rehabilitate facilities and equipments at Kigoma portD1 Jul 13 – Aug 141.7
Rehabilitate and major repair works for lake ports service vesselsD3 Jul 13 – Nov 1312.0
Upgrade lake port capacity
Rehabilitate lake ports facilities for transit cargoD
Strengthen PPP capacity and coordinationC3 Apr 13 – Dec 133.6
Enhance professionalism and information transparencyC1 Apr 13 – Dec 130.04
Capacity building & workforce enhancementC2 Apr 13 – Dec 144.03Strengthen institutional administration
Strengthen institutional administration & build capacity of human capital
C
E
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
22
Process at point of origin
Process at Dar esSalaam
Port
Streamlining and automating operational processes of the Dar es Salaam Port will eliminate bottlenecks and reduce cargo dwell time from 9 to 4 days
Stake-holders
ICD
TPA/ TICTS
TRA
CFA
Shipping Line
OGD
Shipping Agents
Pre-shipment
agents
Importer
Green channel Red channel (scanning/ physical verification) Streamlined process
8
Process (Days)
1
2
3
4
8
Vessel berth / cargo discharge
5
6
9
10
9
11 12
13
D
Cargo dwell time
Average : 9 days
D
6
5
7
10
7
3 BL submission to importer (1) 6 Submission of PAD (1) 9 Delivery order issuance (1) 12 Physical verification (1-2)
1 Application of LC & IDF (1) 4 Submission of permits, etc (1) 7 PAD approval and verifications (2) 10 D&DO / EIR issuance (1) 13 ICD transfer (1)
2 Pre-shipment inspection (1) 5 Manifest submission (1) 8 TANSAD & risk assessment (1) 11 Scanning of goods (1) D Final delivery / collection
-n -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Days
10 11-3
Vessel berth / cargo discharge
-n -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9-3
1
2
3
4
D
Cargo dwell time
Days
11 12
13
D
Year 2012 Year 2015
9
Reduction to 4 days
ADEEPDIVE
23
New port layout to provide increased space for container handling - along with improved operational process, traffic flow and rail handling - increasing container holding capacity from 678,000 TEUs to 1,475,000 TEUs
Improvement to the port layout will provide additional space for efficient handling and movement of goods
Demolish underutilized facilities
Removal and relocation of under-utilized sheds creates greater space and faster cargo movement
Administrative & operational separation
Separating administrative and revenue functions outside of the terminal will stop customers from congesting the port
Sheds 2-7(34,425 m3)
Mid-Port shed (9,000 m3)
Central Workshop (6,800 m3) Expected capacity of container throughput, ‘000 TEUs
TICTS office
Year 2012 Year 2015
Removed sheds
More space for cargo handling
118%Container throughput
466840
212
636
2012 2015
TPA
TICTS
678
1,475
BDEEPDIVE
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
24
Improving the institutional setup, increasing the availabilityof rolling stock and strengthening the business model will revive the railway
§
Get the trains rolling
Make it profitableand sustainable
Get the institu-tional setup right
Strengthen business model
Establish clearinstitutional setup
Adapt organiza-tional set-up for RAHCO and TRL
Improve availability and reliability of rolling stock
Rehabilitate railway infrastructure
Increase level of maintenance
DA ECB F
▪ Clearly defined roles and responsibilities for operator (TRL), regulator (SUMATRA), asset owner (RAHCO) and policy maker (MOT)
▪ Termination of non-functional concession agreement and agreement on undisputed legal framework
▪ Rehabilitation of track, bridges and inter-modal facilities to allow undis-rupted railway operations e.g. relaying of overstretched railway track metals, replacement of low axle load bridges
▪ Rehabilitation of workshops and gang camps
▪ Rehabilitate rolling stock (locos and wagons) to increase availability on the short-term
▪ Remanufacture and procure new rolling stock to increase availability on the mid- and long-term
▪ Create profitable and sustainable business plan with realistic cargo projections and adjusted tariff structure
▪ Reestablish financial monitoring and cargo tracking system
▪ Improve operational efficiency
▪ Create a new organizational set-up to enable operator and asset-owner to adapt to new roles (e.g. RAHCO taking over routine maintenance and casual renewal of track, bridges)
▪ Create new HR including succession plan
▪ Review maintenance operations
▪ Rehabilitate, procure and maintain workshop machinery
▪ Procure inspection trolleys and track maintenance/ monitoring machines to improve maintenance infrastructure
2
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
25
Railway: Recommendations and initiatives
Get the trainsrolling
Make it profitable and sustainable
A Inst. setup
D Strengthen business model
F Maintenance
E Org. setup
B Rehabilitate infrastructure and inter-modal handling facilities
C Improve availability of rolling stock
xyz Budget in TZS billions
Establish an undisputed institutional setup for railway operator, asset owner, regulator and policy makerA1
41.3
Apr 13 – Aug 13
Upgrade/ replacement of 28 low axle load bridges and culverts under condition “E”B1
426.9
Jun 13 – Apr 15
Relay of track portions with light overstretched and worn out track metalB2
12.5
Jun 13 – Dec 15
Rehabilitate 8 station buildings and 3 workshops, build 1 new station building and 15 gang camps to improve maintenance procedures and increase staff motivation
B3
102.6
Jun 13 – Mar 15
Improve telecommunication system in two phases (Dar-Dodoma, Tabora-Kigoma/ Tabora- Mwanza)B4
0.5
Jun 13 – Jan 15
Improve drainage system along Kilosa - Gulwe section to tackle environmental degradationB5
0.2
Jul 13 – Apr 14
Construction of extension of Ubungo line to DSM station to avoid interference of commuter and freight trainsB6
4.8
Jun 13 – Aug 13
Improved handling facilities at Isaka and IlalaB7
0.0
Jul 13 – Feb 15
Find operators for ICDs in Shinyanga and MwanzaB8
0.2
Jul 13 – Aug 13
Improve space situation at Isaka terminalB9
23.0
Apr 13 – Aug 13
Rehabilitate 9 locomotives to improve availability and increase capacityC1
84.6
Apr 13 – Jan 14
Remanufacture 14 locomotives to improve availability and increase capacityC2
272.0
Mar 13 – Nov 14
Procure 13 + 50 locomotives to improve availability and increase capacityC3
8.8
Apr 13 – Dec 15
Rehabilitate 275 freight wagons (covered, container, open) in two tranches (125 and 150)C4
522.6
Apr 13 – May 15
Procure 2234 freight wagon (covered, container, open) in three batches (274 + 970 + 990)C5
13.9
Apr 13 – May 15
Rehabilitate 13 shunting locomotivesC6
20.5
Apr 13 – Nov 14
Procurement of 64 brake vansC7
12.0
Apr 13 – Oct 14
Procurement of 50 ballast hopperC8
0.1
Apr 13 – Oct 14
Create/adjust demand-driven business plan for operations incl. cargo forecast, adjustment of tariff structureD1
3.2
Apr 13 – Jul 13
Reestablish financial monitoring system D2
7.2
Apr 13 – Dec 13
Reestablish cargo tracking system D3
0.5
May 13 – Oct 14
Adapt organizational setup of RAHCO according to its assigned roles and responsibilitiesE1
0
Jul 14 – Jun 16
Adapt organizational setup of TRLE2
6.1
Jul 14 – Jun 16
Create new recruitment strategy for TRLE3
26.2
Apr 13 – Apr 14
Rehabilitate workshop machinery to increase maintenance of rolling stockF1
62.3
Apr 13 – Dec 13
Improve track maintenance proceduresF2
26.6
Mar 13 – Jan 15
Improvement of trolley availability and procurement of track recording carF3
8.5
Apr 13 – Nov 14
Improvement of rolling stock maintenance proceduresF4 May 13 – May 13
Improvement of operational efficiency and adapt operations to increased traffic capacityD4 Jul 14 – Jun 16
0.5
0
88.0Improvement of working capital of TRLD5 May 13 – Nov 13
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
Get the institutional setup right
26
A joint proposal for a new institutional setup for all railway actors has been developed to secure future funding and increase accountability (1/2)
Key decisions Content
Phase I: transition period from 2013-2015 with TRL as only railway operator to stabilize system and reduce complexity
Phase II: long-term perspective from earliest 2016 with option to open network to other private operators
Increased accountabilityfor all actors
Creation of clearly defined legal framework
Establishment of needed legal base for future funding
Establishment of requirement for sustainable business model
Agreement on 2-phase approach1
Phase I: ownership of rolling stock will be transferred from RAHCO to TRL
Phase II: selected tasks such as routine maintenance, operational services, responsibility for railway college, quarry operations and sleeper plant will be transferred from TRL to RAHCO
Assignment of responsibilities for 23 tasks
2
Termination of non-functional concession agreement and replacement by contractual agreement
Establishment of task force for TRL’s debt structure
Amendment of Railway Act and other legislation to allow transfer of rolling stock
Development of detailed plan for implementation
3
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
ADEEPDIVE
27
Roles of MOT, RAHCO, TRL and SUMATRA Assumptions
▪ Performance Agreement between Board and CEOs
▪ Review of the Railway Act to protect TRL assets
▪ GoT to arrange for Financing for TRL with agreed KPI until it is self-sustaining▪ GoT to finance RAHCO until it generates funds from access and compensation fees
▪ In future workshops to be cost centre and/or privatized
▪ To be transferred to TRL as soon as approved by GoT
▪ Funds will be availed by GoT and Development Partners
▪ GoT to subsidize passenger services
▪ Agreement between TRL and RAHCO to include track maintenance materials during transition period
▪ Other operators allowed to operate to enhance competition ▪ To be a cost centre and a subsidiary to RAHCO
▪ TRL make PPP arrangements with major Customers and other operators to provide their own
▪ Strategic policy direction and decisions related to railway services and infrastructure development (CAPEX);
▪ Delegation of power to railway operators
▪ Maintenance and repair of existing Rolling stock
▪ Running Quarry operations▪ Sleeper reconditioning plant for sleeper maintenance
▪ S & T maintenance
▪ Issue licenses to railway operations▪ Approve new rail infrastructure safety systems and unusual safety relating to features of rolling stock
▪ Monitoring of rail transport service standards and standards of performance for provision of rail transport services
▪ Promote, regulate and enforce railway safety▪ Protect and preserve environment
▪ Regulate tariffs
▪ Promoting effective competition and economic efficiency
▪ Resolve complaints and disputes
▪ Promoting the availability of regulated services to all customers including low income, rural and disadvantaged consumers
▪ Initiate and conduct investigation in relation to quality of services provided by the railway operators
▪ Key down standards, code of conduct in respect of rail transport operators and customers;
▪ Investigate Accidents
▪ Performance monitoring and evaluation;
▪ Legal matters at National level (e.g. the Railway Act)
▪ Financing and Budget including, funds mobilization
▪ Railway Assets Owner: Infrastructure Assets (track, bridges, Signaling & Telecommunication, buildings, workshops land, plants)
▪ Ownership of rolling stock
▪ Railway Infrastructure Development
▪ Provide railway freight and passenger services
▪ Routine Infrastructure Maintenance of track, casual renewal of track and operational buildings
▪ Provide operational services▪ Run railway training college and Itigi primary School
▪ Procurement of new rolling stock
▪ Management of rolling stock
▪ TRL Business Plan ▪ TRL will update BP as part of LAB
Current StatusTransition period Long term
STRM TR SM TR SM
M RTS
= Ministry of Transport (MOT) = RAHCO
= TRL= Sumatra
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X
X X XX X X
XXX
X
XX
XXX
XXX
XX
X
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
X X X X X X X X X
X
XX
XXX
X
X
X
X
X
XX
Issues
X
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
A joint proposal for a new institutional setup for all railway actors has been developed to secure future funding and increase accountability (2/2)
ADEEPDIVE
28
1211109876543211211109876543211211109
1,0
TonsMil
2,0
3,0
0876543
Today’s track
600 existing
10 existing
2013 2014 2015
50 procurement
970 procurement
3 million tons
Rehab track/ bridges
RehabRehab
Rehab
9 Rehab
990 procurement
1.3 million tons
14 remanufacture
274 procurement
C3
13 procurement
C5
C5
C3
C5
C2
C1
B2
0.2
0.5
0.8
Track relayed3 principles for network upgrade
Extract the most of today’s assets –rehabilitation comes before remanufacturing and procurement
Give time for operational procedures to adapt
1
Align capacity of locos, wagons and track with business case projection
2
3
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis Wagon capacity
Loco capacity System capacityTrack capacity
Future investment needs have been identified to carefully increase central line’s network capacity (rolling stock and track)to 3 million tons
DEEPDIVEBC
29
Infrastructure and operational roadblocks need to be eliminated to decongest the road and allow seamless travel on the central corridor
Infrastructure enhancement of ‘critical ‘roads
§ Widening Mandela, Nyerere, Mbezi-Kibaha road
§ Widening bridges§ Providing additional road
enhancement
§ Initiating electronic cargo tracking system (ECTS)
§ Reducing police checkpoints
§ Smart weighing systems and operations in place
Build supporting routes
§ Upgrading of Mivinjeni road§ Upgrading ‘missing’ links along
central corridor§ Upgrading regional/district roads§ Construct 6 lane Dar-Morogoro
Expressway
§ Restoring road furniture§ Clearing backlog maintenance
for dilapidated roads§ Initiate periodic maintenance
for current paved roads
Continuous maintenance
Safety and Security
§ Construct new weighbridge near the port
§ Construct additional parking bays
§ One Stop Border Post
Port and border posts’ facilities & services
§ Quick towing services§ Introduce the Road Safety
Act§ Enforcement by Road
Safety Lead Agency
Reducing non-tariff barriers
A B C
D E F
3
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
30
Road: Recommendations and initiatives
Budget in TZS Billions
Infrastructure enhancement on the ‘critical’ roads
Build supporting routes
Continuous road maintenance
Improve and enforce road safety standards
Ports and border posts facilities & services
A
B
C
D
E
F
A1
A2
B2
B3
C1
C2
C3
E1
F2
B1
D1
B5
D2
A3
B4
F1
F3
TimeBudget
Jul 13-Jun 15Adding lanes on the 'critical' roads (Mandela, Nyerere) 84.2
Jul 13-Jun 15
Jul 13-Jun 15
Jul 13-Dec 15
Jul 13-Aug 14
Jul 13-Dec 14
Jul 13-Jul 15
Jul 13-Jun 15
Apr 14-Jul 14
May 13-Jun 14
Jul 13-Jun 16
Jul 13-Jun 14
Jul 13-Feb 15
Jul 13-Jun 15
Jul 13-Jun 14
Providing additional road enhancement for smooth travel 55.3
Upgrading regional/district roads (Kisarawe-Mlandizi) 78.0Constructing 6 lane Dar-Morogoro expressway 101.5
Constructing a new weighbridge near the port 4.7Constructing additional parking bays near the port and border posts 10.0
Introduction of the One Stop Border Post -
Clearing backlog maintenance for current roads 157.0
Introducing quick towing services 0.005Enactment of the Road Safety Act and establishment of the Road Safety Lead Agency
12.7
Upgrading the 'missing links' to bituminous standard 220.2
Linking police online query system with TRA ECTS 5.2
Introducing smart weighing inspection system and operations 4.2
Widening bridges at Kibamba, Kiluvya and Kibaha (Mpuji) 97.5
Introduction of traffic Management system 0.02
Debottleneck critical roads
Eliminate infrastructure and operation roadblocks
Safety & Security
Reducing non-tariff barriers
Jul 13-Jun 15Constructing the Dar Outer Ring Road 169.0
Jul 13-Sep 14Upgrading of Mivinjeni road to bitumen standard 4.8
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
31
Mara
KilimanjaroArusha
Tanga
Lindi
MtwaraRuvuma
Iringa
Morogoro
Pwani
Dar Es Salaam
Dodoma
Singida
Rukwa
Mbeya
Kigoma
Tabora
Shinyanga
Kagera
Mwanza
Reducing 17 non-tariff barriers to only 3 will significantly reduce travel time
Queues at Kibahaweighbridge at night
Queues at Kibahaweighbridge during the Day
Both lane is blocked as a result of long queue at Kibaha weighbridge
Road accident causing con-gestion along Morogoro road
No parking facilities at Kabanga border post
No proper facilities at Kabanga border post
Long queue of trucks at Rusumo border
Congestion alongMandela road
Long trail of trucks parking on the Mandela road
1. Misugusugu2. Dumila3. Isaka
1. Kibaha2. Misugusugu3. Mikese4. Dumila5. Pandambili6. Nala7. Njuki8. Misigiri9. Igunga10. Nzega11. Mwendakulima12. Bukombe13. Nyakanazi14. Nyakahura
No.
TR
Ach
eck
po
ints
Po
lice
ch
eck
po
ints
Name
1
2
3
456
7891011
12
13
14
12
3
Lack of adequate office facilities at Border post 1
2
Current CheckpointsTo be removed
1. Vigwaza2. Manyoni3. Nyakanazi
No.
Po
lice
C
he
ckp
oin
ts
Name
Future Checkpoints
Deformation of asphalt concrete (AC) at Vigwazaalong Mlandizi-Chalinzeroad section
DDEEPDIVE
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
32
Introducing weigh-in motion system will allow better flow of traffic and reduce travel time further
Average delay Time
REDUCEDAverage time taken passing by weigh-in motion system (2015)
STOP
Average time taken on a weighbridge station stop (today)
Time:
91%reduction
of time
1
2
8stops
60minutes per stop
x
Time: 9stops
5minutes passing
through
x
480 minutes
45minutes
DEEPDIVED
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
SOURCE: 1-Today’s number of weighbridges on central corridor 2- Addition of a new weighbridge at the DSM port
1
2
33
AgendaTransport Lab – a short background on how this report has been created
Tanzania’s transport sector – a natural logistics gateway to East and Central Africa
Challenges and issues – what is keeping Tanzania from fulfilling its potential
Our vision: 5 million tons of transit – where we want to be in 2015
Big ideas in each sector – the way we achieve these targets
Quick wins, strategic directions and key enablers – low hanging fruits and long term plans
Budget requirements – what resources are needed to get there
Delivery – how do we ensure successful implementation
Communication – proposed story for open day with the public
Stakeholder sign off – consent by implementers on the outcome of the Transport Lab
34
The lab has identified initiatives that can be implemented with tangible results within the next 6 to 8 months
59
Envisaged dwell time
2015
1
2014
1
2013
2
Current dwell time
37
Envisaged turnaround time
2015
1
2014
1
2013
2
Current turnaround time
ImpactInitiative
0
1
2
2012 2013 2014 2015
024
2012 2013 2014 2015
Description
Dwell time reduced from 9 to 7 daysIntroduce new SOP for cargo collection/ delivery at the port
▪ New SOP to hasten the clearanceof cargo
Container ship turnaround timereduced from 7 to 5 days
Institute 24x7 operating hours at DSM port
▪ Ensure all government departments at the port are operational 24x7
▪ Introduce daytime congestion charges to encourage night time scheduling
Waiting time reduced from 2 to 0 hoursInitiating TRAelectronic tracking system for trucks
▪ System that will allow trucks to pass through TRA checkpoints without the need to stop and is integrated with the police online query system
Waiting time reduced from 3 to 1 hourReduce police check points along central corridor road
▪ Reduce police check points from 14 to 3 which will be located at Vigwaza, Manyoni and Nyakanaziweighbridge stations
1
2
3
4
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
Quick win
35SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
In all sectors, fundamental decisions of the future development in the mid and long term have to be made
Ports –expansion of DSM port or construction of new port
Railway –switching from narrow gauge to standard gauge
Option 1
Option 2
Plans
Option 1
Option 2
Rationale
▪ Further expansion Dar es Salaam port for containers beyond 2015
▪ Increase throughput volume to 1.2 Mil TEUs by 2025▪ Dredging and construction of berth 13
& 14 to allow larger vessels▪ Limitation of space in/surrounding the port ▪ Congestion due to increase of traffic and limitation of
road networks▪ Development of Kisarawe CFS to cater growth
▪ Construction of Bagamoyo port
▪ Targeted throughput of 20 Mil TEUs▪ Natural shelter bay▪ Suitable topography for state-of-the-art design port
construction with expansion options▪ Catalyst for development of special economic zone▪ New rail and road links to be constructed
▪ Changing to standard gauge
▪ Heavy capital investment and long construction time▪ Promotes interoperability between countries ▪ Improve speed, double stacking, volumetric vehicle
sizes, volume and quality of R&D and mass production of rolling stock
▪ Easier supply to new rolling stocks▪ Lower operating cost
▪ Keeping the meter gauge
▪ Existing infrastructure with proven track record▪ Lower capital investment▪ Poor intermodal (cannot have double stack
containers)▪ High operational cost▪ Limited R&D activities
Moving forward plan
▪ Assess the need of the shift by considering the following– What is the market competitive
and comparative analyst– Future plans of shipping lines
and route plans– Potential growth of land locked
countries▪ Establishing core competencies
and differentiation strategy, i.e., transhipment port, container port, bulk port, cruise liner port and maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO)
▪ Assess the need of the shift by considering the following– Is there a business case for
railway connections to the north and south of Tanzania
– What are the future plans of the adjoining countries with their railway systems
– Where is the potential market growth for traffic on existing lines within Tanzania
– What is the potential market growth for traffic from land-locked countries
36
In addition, we have identified key enablers needed to ensure the recommendations are successfully delivered
Case for change
Recommen-dations
▪ Inadequate operating budget restricting new hire
▪ Lack of succession planning
▪ Short term: Public service to approve/extend (max 1 year contract) local hire permit for critical vacancies immediately
▪ Medium term: Establish a policy for all government agencies to submit succession plan
▪ Medium term: Conduct survey on the various age group across the public sector to identify the age gap
Human Capital Development
1▪ Inadequate awareness on
requirements for PPP involvement
▪ Short term: Conduct training and awareness programs to government officers in the respective ministries to understand the requirements of PPP
▪ Short term: Establish a criteria check list for involvement of PPP and distribute to all ministries
Procurement process involving PPP
2▪ Lack of commitment within
the ministry in preparing the drafts
▪ Short term: Bulk submission of all amendments from the labs which is directly monitored by the President’s Delivery Bureau to the Inter-Ministerial Technical Committee of Permanent Secretaries (Initiate Road Safety Act, amend Railway Act)
▪ Medium term: Institutionalize a timeline from initiation of change to approval by parliament
Amendment to Acts 3
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
37
AgendaTransport Lab – a short background on how this report has been created
Tanzania’s transport sector – a natural logistics gateway to East and Central Africa
Challenges and issues – what is keeping Tanzania from fulfilling its potential
Our vision: 5 million tons of transit – where we want to be in 2015
Big ideas in each sector – the way we achieve these targets
Quick wins, strategic directions and key enablers – low hanging fruits and long term plans
Budget requirements – what resources are needed to get there
Delivery – how do we ensure successful implementation
Communication – proposed story for open day with the public
Stakeholder sign off – consent by implementers on the outcome of the Transport Lab
38
A total budget of TZS 3.8 trillion is required to implement all recommendations - 67% rely majorly on public sector funding
Total
3,820,403
2,555,163
301,500963,740
Road
1,214,708
Railway
1,841,256
Port
764,439
Source from public sector
Source from private sector
Source from DP
Development expenditure 2013-15TZS millions
Total
19.900
RoadRailwayPort
Recurring expenditure 2013-15TZS millions
Total budget by sector by yearTZS millions
2015
556,199
174,040
152,063
230,096
2014
1,638,515
603,922
600,442
434,151
2013
1,645,589
445,092
1,094,851
105,646
Railway RoadPort
19,9008,346
6,100
5,454
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
39
The required TZS 3.8 trillion will create transport capacity for additional imports/exports with estimated value of 12.8 trillion
Required investment of TZS 3.8 trillion …
2013: TZS 1.6 trillion
2014: TZS 1.7 trillion
2015: TZS 0.5 trillion
TZS 3.8 trillion
… will create capacity for additional import and export
19.528.1
9.9
6.7
+48%
Total trade 2015
38.0
Total trade 2012
26.2
ExportImport
Budget required transport sector 2013-15TZS millions
Capacity for import and exportValue in TZS millions
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
40
There is more opportunity to reduce the dependency on public funds as there is high interest of involvement by development partners and private sector
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
8%
Development partner
25%
Private sector67%
Public sector
Source of fund
Total: TZS 3.8 trillion
They are waiting to invest !
▪ TZS 693 bil
▪ TZS 270 bil1. World Bank
2.Development Bank of South Africa
3. European Union▪ Interest in port4. Trademark East Africa▪ Interest in rail5. Japan International
Corporation Agency
StatusDevelopment Partner
1. Bakhresa
2.Primefuel
3. Tanga Cement
4. World Food Program ▪ Interest in rail
StatusPrivate sector
▪ Interest in rail
▪ Interest in rail
▪ Interest in rail
PRELIMINARY INTEREST
41
AgendaTransport Lab – a short background on how this report has been created
Tanzania’s transport sector – a natural logistics gateway to East and Central Africa
Challenges and issues – what is keeping Tanzania from fulfilling its potential
Our vision: 5 million tons of transit – where we want to be in 2015
Big ideas in each sector – the way we achieve these targets
Quick wins, strategic directions and key enablers – low hanging fruits and long term plans
Budget requirements– what resources are needed to get there
Delivery – how do we ensure successful implementation
Communication – proposed story for open day with the public
Stakeholder sign off – consent by implementers on the outcome of the Transport Lab
42
The implementation of the NKRA Transport will be monitored by a post lab governance mechanism
Owners:▪ RAHCO▪ TRL▪ SUMATRA
Railway
Members:▪ Minister of Works▪ Minister of Home Affairs▪ Chief Secretary▪ Director General of Civil Service▪ Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Transport▪ Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Works▪ Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Home Affairs▪ Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Finance
Members:▪ Minister of Works▪ Minister of Home Affairs▪ Chief Secretary▪ Director General of Civil Service▪ Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Transport▪ Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Works▪ Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Home Affairs▪ Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Finance
Steering CommitteeChair: PresidentDeputy Chair: Minister of Transport
NKRA Steering Committee level: Meeting once a month▪ Workstream / initiative
owners to provide progress updates
▪ Make decisions and provides guidance / direction to the team
▪ Resolves conflicts▪ Oversees all other matters
related to NKRA
Working level:Meeting more frequently (i.e. bi-weekly)▪ Liaise directly with
Ministry’s Delivery Unit and respective PDBdirectors
▪ Director General of TRA▪ Director General of TPA▪ Inspector General of Police▪ CEO of RAHCO▪ CEO of Tanzania Railway Limited▪ CEO of TANROADS▪ Executive secretary of POPC
Owners:▪ TPA▪ TICTS▪ TRA▪ SUMATRA
Ports
Owners:▪ TANROADS▪ TRA▪ Tanzania Police
Force
Roads
Secretariat:Ministry Delivery Unit (supported by PDB and Executive Secretary of Central Corridor TTFA)
Secretariat:Ministry Delivery Unit (supported by PDB and Executive Secretary of Central Corridor TTFA)
SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
43SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
… through top line performance indicators
Transport Lab
# KPI CategoryWorkstream/initiative
KPIowner
KPI description Unit2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
Source Frequency
KPI target (quantitative) Measurement/tracking
T1 Overall Port Minister, MOT
Throughput capacity at Dar es Salaam Port
Tons 13.0 Mil 15.0 Mil
18.0 Mil
Master log from TPAand TRA
Monthly
T2 Overall Rail Minister, MOT
Capacity transported by TRL
Tons 0.8 Mil 2.0 Mil 3.0Mil Availability of rolling stock + turnaround time & TRLfinancial report
Monthly
T3 Overall Roads Minister, Works
Reduce travel time of trucks from Dar es Salaam port to Mwanza, Rusumoand Kabanga
Hours 76.0 Mil 68.0 Mil
60.0 Mil
TRA electronic cargo tracking system
Monthly
44SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
In addition, specific performance indicators for each sector have been developed - portTransport Lab KPI target (quantitative) Measurement/tracking
Ship turn around time: Arrival at outer anchorage – departure outer anchorageContainer dwell time: Time from container lands on quay site to time departs at the gates
1 Ports Enhance operational efficiency
Minister of MOT, DG TPA and CEO TICTS
Average ship turn around time
Days 5 4 3 Harbourmaster report
Monthly
2 Ports Enhance operational efficiency and strengthening institutional administration
Minister of MOT, DG TPA and CEO TICTS
Container cargo dwell time
Days 7 6 5 Terminal operators and TRA
Monthly
Motor vehicles per shift
3 Ports Port infrastructure modernization
DG TPA RoRo cargo capacity
600 800 1400 Master log from TPA
Monthly
4 Ports Maximize spatial efficiency
DG TPA Trucks gate-in-gate-out
Hours 3 2 1 Terminal operators and TRA
Monthly
5 Ports Maximize spatial efficiency
DG TPA Train gate-in-gate-out
Hours 4 3 2 Terminal operators and TRA
Monthly
# KPI CategoryWorkstream/initiative
KPIowner
KPI description Unit2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
Source Frequency
45SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
Transport Lab KPI target (quantitative) Measurement/tracking
6 Railway Overall performances of the central railway line
CEO TRL Capacity transported by TRL
tons 0.8 Mil 2 Mil 3 Mil Availability of rolling stock + turn around time and financial report
Monthly
7 Railway Improve track maintenance
CCE, TRL Reduce number of train acidents
# of acci-dents
100 50 20 Accidents Report, Safety Department
Monthly
8 Railway Improve track maintenance
Improve cross level, alignment and top (CAT) index
Index rating
2 1 0.5 MATISA Track Recording Car Report, Safety Department
Quarterly
9 Railway Improve availability of rolling stocks
Chief Mechanical Engineer, TRL
Availability of locomotives
% 50 60 80 Control Office Report, Rail Transportation Office
Monthly
CCE, TRL
# KPI CategoryWorkstream/initiative
KPIowner
KPI description Unit2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
Source Frequency
In addition, specific performance indicators for each sector have been developed – railway (1/2)
46SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
Transport Lab KPI target (quantitative) Measurement/tracking
10 Railway Improve availability of rolling stocks
Chief Mechanical Engineer, TRL
Availability of wagons
% 50 70 90 Control Office Report, Rail Transportation Office
Monthly
11 Railway Rehabilitate infrastructure (track and bridges)
Director of Technical Services, RAHCO
Average speed of the train
km/h 30 50 55 Control Office Report, Rail Transportation Office
Monthly
12 Railway Business model
Chief of Rail Transpor-tation, TRL
Turn around time of the wagon
Days 42 20 12 Quarterly commercial report, Commercial Manager Office
Quarterly
# KPI CategoryWorkstream/initiative
KPIowner
KPI description Unit2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
Source Frequency
In addition, specific performance indicators for each sector have been developed – railway (2/2)
47SOURCE: Transport Lab analysis
1 Nyahua – Chaya (90km), Urambo – Kalilua (33km), Kalizambwa – Chagu (40km), Malagarasi – Uvinza (51km)2 Dar Es Salaam port – Tazara (6km), Tazara – JNI Airport (6km), JNI Airport – Pugu Village (8km)
Transport Lab KPI target (quantitative) Measurement/tracking
13 Roads Improve and enforce road safety standards
Minister of Home Affairs
Enactment of Road Safety Act
Cmpl-tion
14-Apr N.A N.A Checklist Quarterly
14 Roads Reducing non-tariff barriers
CEO of TAN-ROADS
Reduce number of weigh bridge station stops
no 9 1 N.A # of weighbridge stops
Monthly
no15 Roads Reducing non-tariff barriers
DG TRA Reduce number of TRA checkpoints
0 N.A N.A # of checkpoints
Monthly
16 Roads Reducing non-tariff barriers
Traffic Po-lice Com-mander
Reduce number of police road blocks
no 3 N.A N.A # of checkpoints
Monthly
17 Roads Build supporting routes
CEO of TAN-ROADS
Upgrading missing links to bituminous standards (214 km)1
km 42 (20%) 214 (100%)
N.A Substantial completion certificate report
Monthly
18 Roads Infrastructural enhancement on critical roads
CEO of TAN-ROADS
Widening critical roads (20 km)2
km 5 (25%) 20 (100%)
N.A Substantial completion certificate report
Monthly
# KPI CategoryWorkstream/initiative
KPIowner
KPI description Unit2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
Source Frequency
In addition, specific performance indicators for each sector have been developed – roads
48
AgendaTransport Lab – a short background on how this report has been created
Tanzania’s transport sector – a natural logistics gateway to East and Central Africa
Challenges and issues – what is keeping Tanzania from fulfilling its potential
Our vision: 5 million tons of transit – where we want to be in 2015
Big ideas in each sector – the way we achieve these targets
Quick wins, strategic directions and key enablers – low hanging fruits and long term plans
Budget requirements – what resources are needed to get there
Delivery – how do we ensure successful implementation
Communication – proposed story for open day with the public
Stakeholder sign off – consent by implementers on the outcome of the Transport Lab
49
Inawezekana, tutekeleze SASA
Asante Sana