transport statement january 2016 mccarthy &...
TRANSCRIPT
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Transport Statement
January 2016
McCarthy & Stone
www.paulbashamassociates.com
McCarthy & Stone Retirement Lifestyles Ltd Ross House, Binley Business Park, Harry Weston Road, Coventry, CV3 2TR
Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Lancaster Court
8 Barnes Wallis Road
Fareham
Hampshire
PO15 5TU
RETIREMENT LIVING DEVELOPMENT
HICKINGS LANE, STAPLEFORD
TRANSPORT STATEMENT
CONTROLLED DOCUMENT
PB-Associates Document No: 050.0032.TS2
Status: Original Copy No:
Name Signature Date
Prepared by: Stewart Rose
January 2016
Checked: Jon Huggett
January 2016
PBA Approved: Jon Huggett
February 2016
Revision Record
Rev. Date By Summary of Changes Chkd Aprvd
2 05.02.16 SR Revised proposals JH JH
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement Report No. 050.0032.TS2
i
TRANSPORT STATEMENT
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1
2. EXISTING LOCAL CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 2
3. ACCESSIBILITY ........................................................................................................... 4
4. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................... 6
5. TRIP GENERATION ..................................................................................................... 8
6. SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 11
Figures
Figure 1: Site Location
Figure 2: PIA map
Tables
Table 1: Bus route summary
Table 2: Vehicle Parking Standards
Table 3: Existing site Vehicle Trip Generation
Table 4: Existing site OGV Trip Generation
Table 5: Proposed development Vehicle Trip Rate
Table 6: Proposed development Vehicle Trip Rate Sensitivity Check
Table 7: Net Change in site Trip Generation
Appendices
Appendix A: Site Layout
Appendix B: Accessibility Map
Appendix C: Vehicle Tracking
Appendix D: Trip Generation abstract from McCarthy & Stone’s Independent research
Appendix E: TRICS Trip Rate output files
RETIREMENT LIVING DEVELOPMENT
HICKINGS LANE, STAPLEFORD
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement Report No. 050.0032.TS2
1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 This Transport Statement (TS) has been prepared by Paul Basham Associates (PBA)
on behalf of McCarthy & Stone Retirement Lifestyles Ltd (MS) to support a planning
application for a proposed redevelopment of former the Sinbad Light Industrial Unit at
Hickings Lane, Stapleford.
1.2 The proposed development comprises of 48 Retirement Living apartments and is
located 1.5km to the north east of Stapleford’s town centre, although facilities such as
convenience stores and pharmacies are located within less than 500m of the site. The
application site is demonstrated in Figure 1, and the site layout is included as Appendix
A.
Figure 1: Site Location
1.3 The scope of this TS reflects the principles of DfT’s ‘Guidance on Transport
Assessments’ (March 2007), reviewing site accessibility, Personal Injury Accident (PIA)
data, the proposed accommodation schedule, car and cycle parking requirements,
visibility and access arrangements, servicing arrangements, trip assessments, traffic
impact and capacity assessment on the local road network (LRN), explores design
solutions and draws conclusions from the overall assessment.
1.4 The highways matters addressed within this TS have been informed by pre-application
discussions with Nottinghamshire County Council highways officers.
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement Report No. 050.0032.TS2
2
2. EXISTING LOCAL CONDITIONS
Existing Site Use
2.1 The development site is currently a light industrial unit providing construction plant hire and
warehousing. The site is bordered by a Hickings Lane (B6004) and a car dealership to the
north, residential properties to the east and south and Ewe Lamb Lane to the west.
2.2 Hickings Lane (B6004) is an arterial route running south west towards Stapleford town
centre. A small service road of the same name runs parallel to Hickings Lane in the vicinity of
the site.
2.3 In the vicinity of the site, Hickings Lane is approximately 6.2m in width and benefits from
footways of between 1.5 and 3m on both sides of the carriageway. Hickings Lane is not
subject to parking restrictions, and some on street parking has been observed in the vicinity
of the site.
Wider Highway Network
2.4 100m to the north east of the site Hickings Lane joins the A6007 via a mini roundabout. This
provides access to the A52 which in turn provides access to the M1.
Personal Injury Accident Data
2.5 Personal Injury Accident (PIA) data has been assessed to consider the existing safety
situation on the local road network. Patterns displayed in the data can be assessed with
regards to the proximity, frequency and severity of incidents that have occurred that may
require further in depth consideration. The PIA data has been collected for a period of three
years from 2012 to 2014.
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement Report No. 050.0032.TS2
3
Figure 2: Recorded injury accidents in the vicinity of the site.
2.6 Nine PIAs have been recorded in the vicinity of the site, one of which was serious. A cluster
of three accidents occurred at the Hickings Lane / A6007 mini roundabout (including the
serious accidents), two accidents are clustered at an adjacent junction. A single slight
accident has been recorded at the junction of Hickings Lane / Ewe Lamb Lane, adjacent to
the site.
2.7 Given the arterial nature of Hickings Lane (and the A6007), the three recorded accidents do
not represent a significant trend. It is also worth noting that the proposals will result in a
significant reduction in large and towing vehicles accessing the site, lowering the potential for
conflict.
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement Report No. 050.0032.TS2
4
3. ACCESSIBILITY
3.1 The application site is located approximately 1.5km north west of Stapleford town centre and
associated facilities. The Department for Transport identifies destinations within 2km as
accessible via walking and cycling; the site location therefore presents a good opportunity to
support sustainable transport with its proximity to local amenities and public transport
networks.
3.2 Although the town centre is located 1.5km from the site, pockets of facilities are located in
the vicinity of the site including a convenience store, ATM, take-way restaurant and
community centre 100m to the north east. A pharmacy is located 450m to the south west of
the site. Ilkston Recreation Ground and Bramcote Hills Park are located 200m to the north
and north east respectively. A facilities map demonstrates the facilities available in the
vicinity of the site, and is included in Appendix B.
Pedestrian Infrastructure
3.3 The site is supported by a continuous footway link to Stapleford town centre, as well as
nearer facilities highlighted above. Footways are available on both sides of the carriageway
and are of variable widths of at least 1.5m.
3.4 The local footway network is of a reasonably level topography and supported by pedestrian
crossing facilities including two zebra crossing facilities located in the town centre on ‘Broad
Street the Square’ to provide safe pedestrian movement around the town centre. Whilst
residents are not required to cross over Hickings Lane to reach the town centre, several side
roads have to be crossed. Signalised crossings are provided in the town centre.
Cycle Facilities
3.5 Whilst no formal cycle routes are currently in place within the immediate vicinity of the site,
the lightly-trafficked nature of the local road network offers an attractive cycling environment.
It is noteworthy that cycling is unlikely to be a major mode of travel for the users of the
proposed development.
Accessible Bus Provisions
3.6 The proposed development is well served by bus. The site is supported by two bus stops;
one on the A6007 (“Ilkston Road”), 200m to the north of the site, and a pair of bus stops on
Hickings Lane, 470m to the south west of the site. These bus stops are serviced by the
routes shown in Table 1.
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement Report No. 050.0032.TS2
5
Stop Service Operator Route Summary Weekday
Frequency
Hickings Lane I4 Trent Barton Derby- Nottingham 10 Minutes
Hickings Lane My15 Trent Barton Ilkeston – Old Sawley 20 Minutes
Hickings Lane Route18 Trent Barton Stapleford- Nottingham 30 Minutes
Hickings Lane 20 Trent Barton Heanor – Nottingham Hourly
Hickings Lane 21 Trent Barton Ilkeston - Nottingham Hourly
Hickings Lane Y4 Yourbus Sandiacre - Nottingham 15 Minutes
Hickings Lane Shopper Service
Notts Bus Spaleford Circuit Hourly (10am-3pm)
Table 1: Bus Route Summary
3.7 The bus stop on Ilkeston Road provides access to the Route 18 service only.
Rail Services
3.8 Whilst Stapleford does not benefit from a rail station, rail services are available in
Attenborough, located 5.1km to the south of the site. Attenborough rail station is on the
Mainland Main line and provides access to Loughborough, Nottingham and Long Eaton, and
intermediary stations typically at an hourly frequency.
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement Report No. 050.0032.TS2
6
4. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Accommodation Schedule
4.1 The proposed development comprises of 48 retirement dwellings, of which 24 are one
bed and 24 are two bed apartments. The site layout is included as Appendix A.
Access Arrangement
4.2 The proposed site will be served by a new bellmouth junction onto Hickings Lane of
approximately 5.5m in width. This is sufficient width to accommodate large delivery
vehicles. The proposed access arrangement is demonstrated in Appendix C.
Internal Layout
4.3 The vehicular access provides direct access to the parking court. A pedestrian link is
proposed from Hickings Lane to the building entrance.
Servicing
4.4 The proposed development will be serviced via Hickings Lane in accordance with pre
application feedback received from the local highway authority. A refuse store is located
adjacent to the access minimising the carry distance of bins. The refuse storage facility
is within 10m of the refuse collection point.
4.1 A tracking investigation of a refuse vehicle entering and turning on site has been
completed to ensure that in the event of the refuse vehicle (or other very large vehicle)
needing to enter the site, it can turn and leave the site safely in forward gear. The
tracking investigation can be seen in Appendix C.
Parking
4.2 There are a total of 36 parking bays provided in the parking court. This provision
equates to 0.75 spaces per apartment.
4.3 The Browtowe Local Plan (adopted 2004) Guidance on Parking indicates a parking
provision of 0.5 spaces per apartment would be appropriate for “sheltered
accommodation”, with staff parking justified and assessed on a case-by-case basis.
4.4 The proposed development incorporates 36 parking spaces, well in excess of the 24
(resident) spaces required. The additional parking provision caters for the <10 members
of staff on site and ensures that the on street parking on Hickings Lane is not affected.
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement Report No. 050.0032.TS2
7
4.5 McCarthy and Stone Retirement Living developments are atypical of retirement flats in
that they allow residents to live a relatively independent life with only a moderate amount
of care. As such the sheltered accommodation category of the Browtowe parking
standards may not accurately reflect the parking requirements of the site.
4.6 In order to provide an appropriate assessment, McCarthy & Stone’s independent
research has been used to give an indication of parking provision. McCarthy & Stone’s
independent research provides evidence of parking demand, on their own sites. Using
this method, the parking strategy for this site is demonstrated in Table 2, and the
appropriate abstract from McCarthy & Stone’s independent research is included as
Appendix D.
Unit size Proposed
number of units
McCarthy &
Stones’ parking
standards (per
apartment)
Expected provision
based on
standards
Proposed parking
spaces
1 bedroom 24 0.338 9 spaces 36 spaces
2 bedroom 24 0.375 9 spaces
Table 2: Parking strategy
4.7 The parking provision is higher than the standards require ensuring that no overspill
parking will occur on the Local Road Network (LRN).
Cycle Parking
4.8 To allow maximum flexibility for residents’ choice of mode of travel, cycle storage is
designed into the motorised scooter storage area, on the basis that a resident who is
sufficiently able bodied to cycle will not have a mobility scooter, and vice versa.
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement Report No. 050.0032.TS2
8
5. TRIP GENERATION
5.1 To determine the net change in trip generation as a result of the proposals, the trip
generation of the existing industrial unit has been considered. On site observations
identified that the entire site is utilised for the storage of plant and construction vehicles
(as well as the turning of large vehicles) and as a result the site area is considered a
more accurate category of trip generation compared to the GFA of the small builds on
the site. The following criteria were used for the TRICS assessment:
Excludes Scotland, Ireland and greater London.
Edge of town, suburban area and neighbourhood centre locations used.
1500-5000m2 floor area
5.2 The results of the TRICS assessment for ‘vehicles’ is shown in Table 3 and shown in full
in Appendix E.
5.3 The TRICS assessment identified the number of OGV (vehicles over 3.5 tonnes) that
are currently accessing the site. These vehicles are included in, and not additional to,
the total number of vehicles generated by the site shown in Table 3. This is summarised
in Table 4 and show in full in Appendix E.
5.4 It is worth noting that the TRICS investigation is likely to understate the OGV generation
of the existing land use, as the “Industrial Unit” Category includes various types of
industrial unit and therefore the trip generation is an average of these. The existing site,
catering for storage and hiring of construction plant and machinery such as earth moving
vehicles, will likely require a greater proportion of OGVs than a typical ‘Industrial Unit’.
5.5 To understand the vehicular trip generation of the proposed development, an
assessment has been undertaken using survey data of sites of a similar nature to the
proposed development.
4,000m2
Vehicles
Industrial Unit
Trip Rate
Industrial Unit
Trip Generation
AM 1.134 45
PM 0.780 31
12H 8.705 348
Table 3: Existing Trip Generation (all vehicles)
4,000m2
o/w OGV
Industrial Unit
Trip Rate
Industrial Unit
Trip Generation
AM 0.078 3
PM 0.013 0
12H 0.425 17
Table 4: Existing Trip Generation (of which OGVs)
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement Report No. 050.0032.TS2
9
5.6 In order to provide an appropriate trip rate for the proposed development, traffic count
surveys have been commissioned at comparable McCarthy & Stone sites, with the
resulting data providing more representative trip rates than available in the TRICS data
sets. McCarthy & Stone’s traffic counts and associated trip rates are summarised within
Table 5. The relevant trip data extract form McCarthy & Stone’s independent research is
attached in Appendix D.
5.7 Table 5 demonstrates an estimated trip rate of 9 trips in the AM peak and 10 trips in the
PM peak. 80 trips over a 12 hour period are shown, which equates to one trip every 9
minutes.
5.8 To ensure the proposed trip rate is realistic the above trip rates have been sensitivity
tested against established TRICS traffic surveys. As previously mentioned, it is
challenging to align the proposed development with a land use classification in the
TRICS database. However, the “Retirement Accommodation” land use is considered the
most representative of the McCarthy & Stone Ortus development. The summary of this
TRICS investigation is summarised in Table 6 and the full TRICS outputs are contained
in Appendix E.
5.9 When comparing the TRICS investigation with McCarthy & Stone’s independent
research, the results indicate that the proposed trip rates are realistic and representative
of the traffic generation of the proposed development.
5.10 The TRICS investigation identified that the proposed development will generate three
OGVs over a 12 hour period, a significant reduction in comparison to the conservative
estimate of 17 OGVs identified by the TRICS assessment. It is also noteworthy that the
OGVs associated with the proposed development are likely to be the smaller 7.5 tonne
vehicles when compared to existing usage.
48 units
vehicles
Retirement Living
Trip Rate
Retirement Living
Trip Generation
AM 0.192 9
PM 0.207 10
12H 1.660 80
Table 5: Proposed trip generation (based on Dr Allan
Burns’ research)
48 units
vehicles
“Retirement Flats”
Trip Rate
“Retirement Flats”
Trip Generation
AM 0.134 6
PM 0.134 6
12H 2.090 100
Table 6: TRICS sensitivity test
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement Report No. 050.0032.TS2
10
Vehicle Impact
5.11 The net change in vehicle trips generated by the site is shown below in Table 7.
5.12 Table 7 demonstrates that the proposed development will result in a significant
reduction in the number of trips generated by the site. On this basis no further
assessment of the vehicular impact on the highway network is required.
Multimodal impact
5.13 Due to the development’s proximity to local facilities, the proposals will generate a
notable quantity of sustainable mode trips. The Accessibility section of this report
outlines the high quality pedestrian, cycle and public transport provisions in the local
area and consequently it is considered unlikely that the increased users of these
facilities will have a detrimental impact on the local highway network.
46 units
vehicles
Existing Trip
Generation
Proposed Trip
Generation
Net
Change
AM 45 9 -36
PM 31 10 -21
12H 348 80 -268
Table 7: TRICS sensitivity test
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement Report No. 050.0032.TS2
11
6. SUMMARY
6.1 This Transport Statement has been prepared by Paul Basham Associates on behalf of
McCarthy & Stone to support a planning application for the residential retirement flat
redevelopment on land adjacent to Hickings Lane, Stapleford.
6.2 The site is ideally located to maximise opportunities to travel by sustainable modes
being under 300m from the local facilities and within walking distance of the town centre.
The local areas benefits from high quality pedestrian and public transport provisions.
6.3 The proposed development will not result in a notable increase in traffic on the local
highway network and is unlikely to have any perceivable impact on the surrounding
junctions.
6.4 The development will be serviced from Hickings Lane. However a tracking investigation
has been undertaking demonstrating that large vehicles can access and egress the site
in forward gear.
6.5 Vehicle parking will be provided in excess of the required provision of 24 (plus staff)
cars. The 36 spaces will ensure overspill parking does not occur on the LRN. Due to the
elderly nature of the residents of the proposals, the mobility scooter storage area is
dynamically designed to accommodate cycles in addition to mobility scooters on the
basis that residents will not require both a cycle and a scooter.
6.6 This Transport Statement has demonstrated that the proposed development will not
result in a negative impact on the capacity or safety of the local road network and will
ultimately improve the urban realm in this area. We would therefore encourage
Broxtowe Borough Council to look favourably upon the highway considerations of this
application.
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement 050.0032TS
Appendix A
1m2m 4m 6m 8m 10m1:200@ A1 SCALE
15m0m
36
33
27
5
16
9
19
- - --
January 20161:200 @ A1
IDP
Planning
Hickings LaneStapleford
© McCarthy & Stone Retirement Lifestyles LimitedAll rights reserved. The reproduction of all or any part of this
drawing/document and/or construction of any building or part of a buildingor structure to which this drawing/document relates without the written
permission of the copyright owner is prohibited.
ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITEWORK TO FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY
REPORT DISCREPANCIES TO THEARCHITECT AT ONCE BEFORE PROCEEDING
Fax : (02476) 454898
Coventry CV3 2TRTelephone: (02476) 454898
Ross House, Binley Business Park, Harry Weston Road
T: +44 (0)24 7652 7600 E:[email protected]
www.weareidp .com
PROJECT MANAGERS.
URBAN DESIGNERS.
WE ARE IDP.
ARCHITECTS.
IDP GROUP 27 SPON STREET COVENTRY CV1 3BA
PLANNERS.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS.
Site Layout
IDP
Proposed Retirement Living Development
MI_2249_01_03_AC_002Site Layout
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement 050.0032TS
Appendix B
Project Number: 050.0032
Title: ACCESSIBILITY MAP
Checked By: JH
Checked Date: 18.01.16
Scale: N/A
Project Name: HICKINGS LANE, STAPLEFORD
Drawn By: SR
Drawn Date: 18.01.16
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement 050.0032TS
Appendix C
49
44
2
12
8
16
10.32
1.665 3.915 1.385
Phoenix 2 Duo Kitchen & Food Waste Recycler (P2-12W with Elite 6x4 chassis)Overall Length 10.320mOverall Width 2.530mOverall Body Height 3.756mMin Body Ground Clearance 0.309mTrack Width 2.530mLock to Lock Time 4.00sKerb to Kerb Turning Radius 9.450m
5
49
44
2
12
8
16
8.68
1.52 3.81
DB32 Fire ApplianceOverall Length 8.680mOverall Width 2.180mOverall Body Height 3.452mMin Body Ground Clearance 0.337mMax Track Width 2.121mLock to Lock Time 6.00sKerb to Kerb Turning Radius 7.910m
NORTH
5
Refuse
HM
Buggy
Lobby
Reception
EntranceEntrance
Main
2
8
264.572
0.951 2.578
Skoda OctaviaOverall Length 4.572mOverall Width 1.769mOverall Body Height 1.488mMin Body Ground Clearance 0.249mMax Track Width 1.713mLock to Lock Time 4.00sKerb to Kerb Turning Radius 5.100m
Scale
Revision
(AT A3 SIZE)
Project NameTitle
Project Phase
Checked DateChecked By
Drawn By Drawn Date
Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Lancaster Court
8 Barnes Wallis Road
Fareham Hampshire
PO15 5TU
T +44 (0) 1489 668134
W www.paulbashamassociates.com
PBA Drawing No.Client Drawing No.
Client
HICKINGS LANE
STAPLEFORD
PRELIMINARY
VEHICLE TRACKING
MS 04.11.15
SR 04.11.15
1:250
050-0032-001
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement 050.0032TS
Appendix D
MCCARTHY AND STONE CATEGORY II FACT FILE (2007) No. 17
Parking Requirements
Car parking
There are a number of different types of parking that can occur within the car parks of this
form of housing. The first is the resident parking. The car ownership of residents is
considered in Fact File 10 for car ownership and Fact file 12 for ownership of other modes.
Government guidance encourages lower levels of car parking provision, in order to make
better use of urban land and to discourage the use of the car.
Many housing developments would not make full car parking provision for all visitors.
Friends, relatives and even medical professionals/carers would be expected to park off the site
and to walk to the home in question.
In determining the level of car parking proposed at a new development, the location of the
development should be considered, with possibly lower provision being made in highly
accessible locations and higher provision in more remote locations. Furthermore, if there is
off-site car parking readily available, on-site parking could be reduced such that visitors might
be expected to park off the site.
In order to assess the overall normal demand, the survey data from 13 developments has been
analysed to determine the peak level of car parking within the sites. The results are shown in
Table 17.1 below.
The table shows that the overall peak hour for parking demand was 9 to 10 a.m., when there
were 197 vehicles parked in the 13 developments, with 554 apartments. This equates to 0.356
vehicles per apartment. Such provision would be likely to meet the majority of car parking
needs of residents, staff and visitors.
The developments analysed are indicate in the following list, with their identification number
that is used in Table 17.1, below:-
1. Faregrove Court, Fareham
2. Charlwood Court, Torquay
3 Stevens Court, Winnersh
4. Homelawn House, Bexhill on Sea
5. Hornbeam Court, Guiseley
6. Camsell Court, Framwellgate Moor, Durham
7. Fairweather Court, Darlington
8. Browning Court, Fenham, Newcastle
9. Cwrt Beaufort, Swansea
10. Jarvis Court, Brackley
11. Aiden’s View, Clarkston, Glasgow
12. Chancellor Court, Chelmsford
13. Devereux Court, Woodford Green
Table 17.1 Maximum Car Park Occupancy – per apartment
Devt 1 2 3 4 5* 6 7* 8 9 10 11 12 13 Totls
Aparts 48 39 34 81 39 48 45 36 33 47 45 34 21 550
Starting 17 9 9 29 16 18 14 13 12 19 15 8 6 185
0700-0800 17 10 9 29 16 20 14 14 13 19 15 8 6 190
0800-0900 17 11 10 28 16 20 18 13 12 18 16 7 7 193
0900-1000 18 14 11 26 17 20 17 13 14 15 19 7 6 197
1000-1100 15 11 9 24 15 16 14 12 13 16 15 8 9 177
1100-1200 18 13 7 24 15 18 14 12 11 19 18 8 8 185
1200-1300 18 13 9 26 13 18 13 8 11 17 14 11 8 179
1300-1400 17 12 11 26 14 19 12 11 8 14 15 11 7 177
1400-1500 15 12 11 24 14 18 12 12 7 14 17 14 6 176
1500-1600 15 13 12 26 13 16 15 14 8 15 18 12 6 183
1600-1700 13 12 11 28 14 15 15 13 10 16 17 9 7 180
1700-1800 13 12 9 31 14 17 15 13 10 11 15 10 6 176
1800-1900 13 12 11 31 14 17 14 13 10 14 16 10 6 181
Peak Cars
(per
Apartment)
0.38
0.36
0.35
0.38
0.436
0.42
0.4
0.39
0.42
0.4
0.42
0.4
1
0.43
0.358
The absolute peak demand at the busiest of the developments was 0.436 cars per apartment at
the Guiseley development. This is a development where car parking permits were provided
for the residents. The other such development was no.7 in the list (Darlington), where the
peak demand for spaces was 0.4.
It has been shown that the owners of two bedroom apartments tend to have a higher car
ownership than those in the smaller apartments. This survey suggests that the two bedroom
apartment owners have an 11% higher car ownership If this is assumed for all the
developments considered in Table 17.1 above, we can assess the peak car parking demand per
bedroom. The calculation of the number of bedrooms and the “one-bedroom equivalents is
shown in Table 17.2, below.
Table 17.2 Car Parking – Peak Demand related to one-bedroom equivalents.
Devt 1 2 3 4 5* 6 7* 8 9 10 11 12 13 Totls
Total Aparts 48 39 34 81 39 48 45 36 33 47 45 34 21 550
One bedroom
Apartments
39 28 25 65 27 34 31 28 25 35 22 24 13 396
Two bedroom
Apartments
9 11 9 16 12 14 14 8 8 12 23 10 8 154
Two
bedrooms x
1.1
9.99 12.2 9.99 17.76 13.32 15.54 15.54 8.88 8.88 13.32 25.53 11.1 8.88 170.93
Peak Cars
Parked
18 14 12 31 17 20 18 14 14 19 19 14 9 197
The table shows that there are a total of 396 one bedroom apartments and 154 two bedroom
apartments. The 154 in then multiplied by 1.11, i.e. the higher car ownership of two bedroom
apartments, to give a “one-bedroom equivalent” of 170.93, say 171. This indicates a total of
“one bedroom apartments and the equivalent” of 567.
The peak parking demand is 197 spaces, as derived in Table 17.1. This gives a peak demand
of 0.35 spaces per one bedroom (including the equivalent).
Cycle Parking
Data included in Fact File 12 shows that the cycle ownership amongst residents is very low, at
0.206 cycles per apartment.
Given the possible use of cycles by the house manager or other staff, some secure cycle
storage should be provided. It is only the house manager that is likely to be on-site for an
extended period and so an appropriate provision of covered and secure cycle parking might be
0.0206 cycles per apartment for residents’ cycles (rounded up to the next whole number) and
say 1 or 2 for members of staff. This may be incorporated into the buggy store, thereby
giving greater flexibility of provision.
Some short–stay cycle parking should also be provided. This need not be covered but should
allow the visitor to secure the cycle, using a cycle loop or similar purpose made facility. The
number of visits by cyclists has been surveyed at most of the sites selected for this study. This
shows the following visits by bicycle:-
Table 17.3 Cycle Visits
Devt 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Totals
Apartments 48 39 34 81 39 48 45 36 33 47 45 495
Max Cycle
Parking
0 1 1
0 0 0 1 1
(twice)
0 2 0 6
Period of
presence of
at least 1
cycle
0 108
mins
12
mins
0 0 0 4
mins
Paper
boy
12
Possibly
paper
boy/girl
0 62
mins
(11
mins
for
2)
0 198
mins
The only time when more than one visitor’s cycle was on the site at any one time was at the
Brackley development. In most cases there were no visits by cycles.
This would suggest that, in normal circumstances only one, short-stay visitor cycle parking
space would be required. However, in order to encourage use of cycles by visitors, a higher
provision of say 2 or ideally 4 such spaces should be provided. This provision should be
appropriate for all normal sized developments, and even up to some 90 or even 100 apartments
Buggy Parking
The survey data on buggy ownership is given in Fact File no.12. This states:-
“Only 1 of the responses from the 97 apartments indicated the ownership of a buggy, although
a further 8 apartment responses indicated a desire to own a buggy. Therefore the actual
buggy ownership was 0.0103 buggies per apartment, although if one includes the possible
demand for buggy ownership, this would be increased to 0.092 buggies per apartment. This is
almost 1 buggy per 10 apartments.”
This would suggest a minimum of 1 buggy space per 10 apartments. However, a higher
provision may encourage the use of these vehicles and may also allow for increased ownership
as the residents in a development tend to age.
MCCARTHY AND STONE CATEGORY II FACT FILE (2008-2011) No. 15
Trip Generation
Surveys have been undertaken in April 2008 and May, June and July 2011 at several
CATEGORY II developments that are well established or where the initially sales period is
fully complete. It should be noted that survey staff were instructed to include in the traffic
data any vehicle parked in the road outside the development, where the person(s) leaving the
car entered the development.
Table 15.1 below shows the resulting traffic generation data:-
Table 15.1 Traffic Generation (Vehicle Movements per 12 hour day – 0700-1900)
Development Date of Survey No of
Apartments
Vehicle Movements
(12 Hr)
Generation
per apartment
Faregrove Court,
Fareham Fri 4 April 2008 48 50 (0) 1.04
Charlwood Court,
Torquay Thurs 3 April 2008 39 78 (0) 2.0
Stevens Court,
Winnersh Wed 2 April 2008 34 67 (0) 1.97
Homelawn House,
Bexhill on Sea Tues 1 April 2008 81 159 (0) 1.96
Devereux Court,
Woodford Green Tues 1 March 2011 21 37 (2) 1.76
Chancellor Court,
Chelmsford Tues 1 March 2011 34 73 (0) 2.14
Hornbeam Crt,
Guisely * Tues 24 May 2011 39 46 (0) 1.18
Camsell Court,
Framwellgate Moor,
Durham
Mon 23 May 2011 48 67 (2) 1.4
Fairweather Crt,
Darlington * Mon 23 May 2011 45 63 (0) 1.4
Browning Court,
Fenham, Newcastle Tues 24 May 2011 36 52 (0) 1.44
Cwrt Beaufort,
Swansea Wed 6 July 2011 33 47 (0) 1.42
Jarvis Court,
Brackley Wed 29 June 2011 47 95 (4) 2.02
AAttkkiinnssoonn CCoouurrtt ,,
CCoosshhaamm,, PPoorrttssmmoouutthh Tues 28 June 2011 46 69 (0) 1.5
Jubilee Court,
Worthing Tues 5 July 2011 60 113 (0) 1.88
Aiden’s View,
Clarkston, Glasgow Mon 1 August 2011 45 76 1.69
Totals 656 1092 (6) 1.66
The bracketed figure is the number of heavy goods vehicles recorded as visiting the
development.
* Parking permits issued
This indicates that the average traffic generation for this form of development is 1.66 vehicle
movements per apartment per 12 hour day. The range of these generation rates is significant,
with the lowest being at Guiseley (1.18) and the highest at Chelmsford (2.14).
It may be of note that the lowest trip rate was at one of the developments where parking on the
site was controlled by parking permits. The other development where permits have been
issued also had a lower than average car ownership. However, at present the number of such
developments that have been surveyed is too small to draw any significant conclusions from
this.
Surveys at two developments (Atkinson Court, Cosham, Portsmouth and Jubilee Court,
Worthing) were undertaken by video recorder over a full 24 hour period. At the Portsmouth
site there were 10 vehicle movements between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. At the Worthing
development there were 4 such vehicle movements. These developments included a total of
106 apartments, giving a night (7 p.m. to 7 a.m.) trip rate of 0.13 vehicle movements per
apartment.
The surveys allow the hourly distribution of trips to and from the development to be
calculated. The results of the daily distribution are shown in Table 15.2, below.
Table 15.2 Hourly Distribution of Vehicle Movements (0700-1900)
Time Period Arrivals% Departures%
0700-0800 2.6 3.1
0800-0900 6.1 5.5
0900-1000 9.8 12.0
1000-1100 8.7 11.9
1100-1200 10.0 8.6
1200-1300 10.2 10.8
1300-1400 10.2 10.0
1400-1500 10.4 8.9
1500-1600 8.5 8.0
1600-1700 10.4 9.9
1700-1800 7.6 4.9
1800-1900 5.4 6.4
Totals 99.9 100
The hourly split for the “overnight” traffic movements, based on the video data for 2
developments, shows the following split.
Table 15.3 Hourly Distribution of Vehicle Movements (1900-0700)
Time Period Arrivals% Departures%
1900-2000 42.8 14.3
2000-2100 28.6 28.6
2100-2200 28.6 57.1
2200-0700 0 0
Totals 100 100
This shows that there is highly unlikely to be any significant level of vehicle movements at
unsocial hours, such as between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. and that the level of movements during the
evening period is likely to be very low.
Table 15.4 below shows the resulting traffic generation data for residents, where it is possible
to identify them. Vehicles that are present in the car park at the start of the survey are
assumed to be residents. It should be noted that not all the surveys allowed this data to be
obtained.
Table 15.4 Residents’ Generation (Vehicle Movements per 12 hour day – 0700-1900)
The resident trip rate at these developments has been found to be 0.45 vehicle movements per
apartment per day. The corresponding visitor/staff generation is some 1.26 vehicle
movements per day. This gives a total generation for these developments of 1.71. This is
slightly higher than the average derived above for a larger number of developments.
However, if we assume the same proportions of residents’ and other trips, and apply these to
the overall average trip rate, we would get 26.3% resident trips and 73.7% visitor and other
trips. The resulting trip rates would then become:-
Resident trip rate:- 0.44 vehicle movements per 12 hour day
Visitor/staff/other trip rate:- 1.22 vehicle movements per 12 hour day
Development Date of Survey No of
Apartments
Vehicle Movements
(12 Hr)
Generation
per apartment
Charlwood Court,
Torquay Thurs 3 April 2008 39 11 0.28
Stevens Court,
Winnersh Wed 2 April 2008 34 18 0.53
Homelawn House,
Bexhill on Sea Tues 1 April 2008 81 49 0.62
Devereux Court,
Woodford Green Tues 1 March 2011 21 7 0.33
Chancellor Court,
Chelmsford Tues 1 March 2011 34 17 0.5
Hornbeam Crt,
Guisely * Tues 24 May 2011 39 23 0.59
Camsell Court,
Framwellgate Moor,
Durham
Mon 23 May 2011 48 21 0.44
Fairweather Crt,
Darlington * Mon 23 May 2011 45 10 0.21
Browning Court,
Fenham, Newcastle Tues 24 May 2011 36 19 0.53
Cwrt Beaufort,
Swansea Wed 6 July 2011 33 9 0.29
Jarvis Court,
Brackley Wed 29 June 2011 47 31 0.67
Aiden’s View,
Clarkston, Glasgow Mon 1 August 2011 45 11 0.24
Totals 502 226 0.45
The surveys also noted the number of pedestrian, cycle, motorcycle, buggy and wheelchair
trips generated. It should be noted, of course, that some of the pedestrian could please going
to or from bus trips.
Table 15.4 Non Vehicle Mode Generation (Movements)
Development Aps Walk Rate Motor
cycle
Rate Cycle Rate Buggy Rate Wheel
Chair
Rate
Faregrove Court,
Fareham 48 106 2.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Charlwood Court,
Torquay 39 138 3.53 1 0.026 1 0.026 0 0 0 0
Stevens Court,
Winnersh 34 22 0.65 0 0 2 0.059 0 0 0 0
Homelawn House,
Bexhill on Sea 81 115 1.42 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.123
Hornbeam Crt,
Guisely * 39 63 1.62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camsell Court,
Framwellgate
Moor, Durham
48 34 0.71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fairweather Crt,
Darlington * 45 71 1.58 0 0 2 0.044 0 0 0 0
Browning Court,
Fenham,
Newcastle
36 51 1.42 0 0 4 0.11 0 0 0 0
Cwrt Beaufort,
Swansea 33 4 0.12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jarvis Court,
Brackley 47 25 0.53 0 0 4 0.09 0 0 0 0
AAttkkiinnssoonn CCoouurrtt ,,
CCoosshhaamm,,
PPoorrttssmmoouutthh
46 65 1.41 0 0 9 0.2 2 0.04 0 0
Jubilee Court,
Worthing 60 104 1.73 0 0 3 0.05 0 0 0 0
Aiden’s View,
Clarkston,
Glasgow
45 43 0.96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals/Average
rates
601 841 1.4 1 0.0017 21 0.035 2 0.003 10 0.017
The average rate of walking movements per apartment are only slightly lower than that of the
motor vehicle, at 1.4 pedestrian movements per apartment per day. It is emphasised that this
is an average, and varies between developments. In addition, the weather of the day of the
survey would be likely to influence these movements. The same comment would apply to
trips made by bicycle, by buggy or in a wheelchair.
Hickings Lane, Stapleford Paul Basham Associates Ltd
Transport Statement 050.0032TS
Appendix E
TRICS 7.2.4 171215 B17.29 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/01/16
Industrial Unit yr 2000 Page 1
Paul Basham Associates Hamble Lane Southampton Licence No: 247601
Calculation Reference: AUDIT-247601-160106-0159
TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:
Land Use : 02 - EMPLOYMENT
Category : C - INDUSTRIAL UNIT
VEHICLES
Selected regions and areas:
02 SOUTH EAST
HF HERTFORDSHIRE 1 days
03 SOUTH WEST
DC DORSET 2 days
06 WEST MIDLANDS
HE HEREFORDSHIRE 1 days
WM WEST MIDLANDS 1 days
Filtering Stage 2 selection:
Parameter: Gross floor area
Actual Range: 1800 to 4600 (units: sqm)
Range Selected by User: 1500 to 5000 (units: sqm)
Public Transport Provision:
Selection by: Include all surveys
Date Range: 04/07/00 to 22/10/13
Selected survey days:
Tuesday 3 days
Thursday 2 days
Selected survey types:
Manual count 5 days
Directional ATC Count 0 days
Selected Locations:
Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 2
Edge of Town 3
Selected Location Sub Categories:
Industrial Zone 4
Commercial Zone 1
TRICS 7.2.4 171215 B17.29 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/01/16
Industrial Unit yr 2000 Page 2
Paul Basham Associates Hamble Lane Southampton Licence No: 247601
LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters
1 DC-02-C-02 NEWSPAPER HQ DORSET
HAMPSHIRE ROAD
CHICKERELL
WEYMOUTH
Edge of Town
Industrial Zone
Total Gross floor area: 3 0 3 5 sqm
2 DC-02-C-05 ELECTRONICS CO. DORSET
HAMPSHIRE ROAD
GRANBY IND. ESTATE
WEYMOUTH
Edge of Town
Industrial Zone
Total Gross floor area: 4 6 0 0 sqm
3 HE-02-C-02 THERMAL PROCESSING HEREFORDSHIRE
COLLEGE ROAD
BURCOTT
HEREFORD
Edge of Town
Commercial Zone
Total Gross floor area: 1 8 8 0 sqm
4 HF-02-C-01 INDUSTRIAL UNIT HERTFORDSHIRE
BRIDGE ROAD EAST
WELWYN GARDEN CITY
Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre)
Industrial Zone
Total Gross floor area: 1 8 0 0 sqm
5 WM-02-C-01 METAL BEARINGS WEST MIDLANDS
FORGE LANE
MINWORTH
SUTTON COLDFIELD
Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre)
Industrial Zone
Total Gross floor area: 4 2 0 0 sqm
TRICS 7.2.4 171215 B17.29 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/01/16
Industrial Unit yr 2000 Page 3
Paul Basham Associates Hamble Lane Southampton Licence No: 247601
TRIP RATE for Land Use 02 - EMPLOYMENT/C - INDUSTRIAL UNIT
VEHICLES
Calculation factor: 100 sqm
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate
00:00 - 00:30
00:30 - 01:00
01:00 - 01:30
01:30 - 02:00
02:00 - 02:30
02:30 - 03:00
03:00 - 03:30
03:30 - 04:00
04:00 - 04:30
04:30 - 05:00
05:00 - 05:30
05:30 - 06:00
06:00 - 06:30
06:30 - 07:00
5 3103 0.122 5 3103 0.019 5 3103 0.14107:00 - 07:30
5 3103 0.451 5 3103 0.045 5 3103 0.49607:30 - 08:00
5 3103 0.406 5 3103 0.077 5 3103 0.48308:00 - 08:30
5 3103 0.490 5 3103 0.161 5 3103 0.65108:30 - 09:00
5 3103 0.213 5 3103 0.058 5 3103 0.27109:00 - 09:30
5 3103 0.097 5 3103 0.058 5 3103 0.15509:30 - 10:00
5 3103 0.161 5 3103 0.148 5 3103 0.30910:00 - 10:30
5 3103 0.129 5 3103 0.122 5 3103 0.25110:30 - 11:00
5 3103 0.155 5 3103 0.148 5 3103 0.30311:00 - 11:30
5 3103 0.116 5 3103 0.135 5 3103 0.25111:30 - 12:00
5 3103 0.142 5 3103 0.174 5 3103 0.31612:00 - 12:30
5 3103 0.187 5 3103 0.342 5 3103 0.52912:30 - 13:00
5 3103 0.309 5 3103 0.187 5 3103 0.49613:00 - 13:30
5 3103 0.251 5 3103 0.097 5 3103 0.34813:30 - 14:00
5 3103 0.122 5 3103 0.122 5 3103 0.24414:00 - 14:30
5 3103 0.090 5 3103 0.064 5 3103 0.15414:30 - 15:00
5 3103 0.148 5 3103 0.142 5 3103 0.29015:00 - 15:30
5 3103 0.142 5 3103 0.180 5 3103 0.32215:30 - 16:00
5 3103 0.103 5 3103 0.303 5 3103 0.40616:00 - 16:30
5 3103 0.103 5 3103 0.503 5 3103 0.60616:30 - 17:00
5 3103 0.045 5 3103 0.419 5 3103 0.46417:00 - 17:30
5 3103 0.026 5 3103 0.290 5 3103 0.31617:30 - 18:00
5 3103 0.032 5 3103 0.142 5 3103 0.17418:00 - 18:30
5 3103 0.039 5 3103 0.058 5 3103 0.09718:30 - 19:00
19:00 - 19:30
19:30 - 20:00
20:00 - 20:30
20:30 - 21:00
21:00 - 21:30
21:30 - 22:00
22:00 - 22:30
22:30 - 23:00
23:00 - 23:30
23:30 - 24:00
Total Rates: 4.079 3.994 8.073
TRICS 7.2.4 171215 B17.29 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/01/16
Industrial Unit yr 2000 Page 4
Paul Basham Associates Hamble Lane Southampton Licence No: 247601
Parameter summary
Trip rate parameter range selected: 1800 - 4600 (units: sqm)
Survey date date range: 04/07/00 - 22/10/13
Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 5
Number of Saturdays: 0
Number of Sundays: 0
Surveys manually removed from selection: 1
TRICS 7.2.4 171215 B17.29 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/01/16
Industrial Unit yr 2000 Page 5
Paul Basham Associates Hamble Lane Southampton Licence No: 247601
TRIP RATE for Land Use 02 - EMPLOYMENT/C - INDUSTRIAL UNIT
OGVS
Calculation factor: 100 sqm
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate
00:00 - 00:30
00:30 - 01:00
01:00 - 01:30
01:30 - 02:00
02:00 - 02:30
02:30 - 03:00
03:00 - 03:30
03:30 - 04:00
04:00 - 04:30
04:30 - 05:00
05:00 - 05:30
05:30 - 06:00
06:00 - 06:30
06:30 - 07:00
5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.00607:00 - 07:30
5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.00007:30 - 08:00
5 3103 0.026 5 3103 0.013 5 3103 0.03908:00 - 08:30
5 3103 0.013 5 3103 0.026 5 3103 0.03908:30 - 09:00
5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.01209:00 - 09:30
5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.01209:30 - 10:00
5 3103 0.013 5 3103 0.013 5 3103 0.02610:00 - 10:30
5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.01210:30 - 11:00
5 3103 0.039 5 3103 0.032 5 3103 0.07111:00 - 11:30
5 3103 0.013 5 3103 0.026 5 3103 0.03911:30 - 12:00
5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.00012:00 - 12:30
5 3103 0.013 5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.01912:30 - 13:00
5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.00613:00 - 13:30
5 3103 0.019 5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.02513:30 - 14:00
5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.01214:00 - 14:30
5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.013 5 3103 0.01314:30 - 15:00
5 3103 0.013 5 3103 0.019 5 3103 0.03215:00 - 15:30
5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.00615:30 - 16:00
5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.01216:00 - 16:30
5 3103 0.013 5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.01316:30 - 17:00
5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.013 5 3103 0.01317:00 - 17:30
5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.00017:30 - 18:00
5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.01218:00 - 18:30
5 3103 0.006 5 3103 0.000 5 3103 0.00618:30 - 19:00
19:00 - 19:30
19:30 - 20:00
20:00 - 20:30
20:30 - 21:00
21:00 - 21:30
21:30 - 22:00
22:00 - 22:30
22:30 - 23:00
23:00 - 23:30
23:30 - 24:00
Total Rates: 0.210 0.215 0.425
TRICS 7.2.4 171215 B17.29 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/01/16
Industrial Unit yr 2000 Page 6
Paul Basham Associates Hamble Lane Southampton Licence No: 247601
Parameter summary
Trip rate parameter range selected: 1800 - 4600 (units: sqm)
Survey date date range: 04/07/00 - 22/10/13
Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 5
Number of Saturdays: 0
Number of Sundays: 0
Surveys manually removed from selection: 1
TRICS 7.2.4 171215 B17.29 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/01/16
Retirement Flats yr 2003 TR Page 1
Paul Basham Associates Hamble Lane Southampton Licence No: 247601
TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:
Land Use : 03 - RESIDENTIAL
Category : N - RETIREMENT FLATS
VEHICLES
Selected regions and areas:
04 EAST ANGLIA
CA CAMBRIDGESHIRE 1 days
07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE
SY SOUTH YORKSHIRE 1 days
09 NORTH
TW TYNE & WEAR 1 days
10 WALES
CF CARDIFF 1 days
VG VALE OF GLAMORGAN 1 days
Filtering Stage 2 selection:
Parameter: Number of dwellings
Actual Range: 28 to 50 (units: )
Range Selected by User: 28 to 76 (units: )
Public Transport Provision:
Selection by: Include all surveys
Date Range: 01/01/03 to 19/12/12
Selected survey days:
Monday 1 days
Wednesday 2 days
Thursday 1 days
Friday 1 days
Selected survey types:
Manual count 5 days
Directional ATC Count 0 days
Selected Locations:
Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 2
Edge of Town 2
Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) 1
Selected Location Sub Categories:
Residential Zone 4
No Sub Category 1
TRICS 7.2.4 171215 B17.29 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/01/16
Retirement Flats yr 2003 TR Page 2
Paul Basham Associates Hamble Lane Southampton Licence No: 247601
LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters
1 CA-03-N-01 RETIREMENT FLATS CAMBRIDGESHIRE
HEDDA DRIVE
HAMPTON HARGATE
PETERBOROUGH
Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre)
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 5 0
2 CF-03-N-02 RETIREMENT FLATS CARDIFF
ASHDOWN CLOSE
ST MELLONS
CARDIFF
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 3 5
3 SY-03-N-01 RETIREMENT FLATS SOUTH YORKSHIRE
MOSS CLOSE
WICKERSLEY
NEAR ROTHERHAM
Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre)
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 2 8
4 TW-03-N-02 RETIREMENT FLATS TYNE & WEAR
BRABOURNE GARDENS
NORTH SHIELDS
Edge of Town
No Sub Category
Total Number of dwellings: 3 6
5 VG-03-N-01 RETIREMENT FLATS VALE OF GLAMORGAN
BRADFORD PLACE
P E N A R T H
Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre)
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 4 6
TRICS 7.2.4 171215 B17.29 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/01/16
Retirement Flats yr 2003 TR Page 3
Paul Basham Associates Hamble Lane Southampton Licence No: 247601
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/N - RETIREMENT FLATS
VEHICLES
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
5 39 0.015 5 39 0.015 5 39 0.03007:00 - 08:00
5 39 0.072 5 39 0.062 5 39 0.13408:00 - 09:00
5 39 0.092 5 39 0.092 5 39 0.18409:00 - 10:00
5 39 0.082 5 39 0.087 5 39 0.16910:00 - 11:00
5 39 0.123 5 39 0.169 5 39 0.29211:00 - 12:00
5 39 0.108 5 39 0.138 5 39 0.24612:00 - 13:00
5 39 0.133 5 39 0.138 5 39 0.27113:00 - 14:00
5 39 0.067 5 39 0.082 5 39 0.14914:00 - 15:00
5 39 0.046 5 39 0.051 5 39 0.09715:00 - 16:00
5 39 0.154 5 39 0.087 5 39 0.24116:00 - 17:00
5 39 0.067 5 39 0.067 5 39 0.13417:00 - 18:00
5 39 0.087 5 39 0.056 5 39 0.14318:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 1.046 1.044 2.090
Parameter summary
Trip rate parameter range selected: 28 - 50 (units: )
Survey date date range: 01/01/03 - 19/12/12
Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 5
Number of Saturdays: 0
Number of Sundays: 0
Surveys manually removed from selection: 1
TRICS 7.2.4 171215 B17.29 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/01/16
Retirement Flats yr 2003 TR Page 4
Paul Basham Associates Hamble Lane Southampton Licence No: 247601
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/N - RETIREMENT FLATS
OGVS
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
5 39 0.000 5 39 0.000 5 39 0.00007:00 - 08:00
5 39 0.000 5 39 0.000 5 39 0.00008:00 - 09:00
5 39 0.015 5 39 0.010 5 39 0.02509:00 - 10:00
5 39 0.005 5 39 0.000 5 39 0.00510:00 - 11:00
5 39 0.010 5 39 0.015 5 39 0.02511:00 - 12:00
5 39 0.000 5 39 0.000 5 39 0.00012:00 - 13:00
5 39 0.000 5 39 0.000 5 39 0.00013:00 - 14:00
5 39 0.005 5 39 0.000 5 39 0.00514:00 - 15:00
5 39 0.000 5 39 0.000 5 39 0.00015:00 - 16:00
5 39 0.000 5 39 0.000 5 39 0.00016:00 - 17:00
5 39 0.000 5 39 0.005 5 39 0.00517:00 - 18:00
5 39 0.000 5 39 0.000 5 39 0.00018:00 - 19:00
1 50 0.000 1 50 0.000 1 50 0.00019:00 - 20:00
1 50 0.000 1 50 0.000 1 50 0.00020:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 0.035 0.030 0.065
Parameter summary
Trip rate parameter range selected: 28 - 50 (units: )
Survey date date range: 01/01/03 - 19/12/12
Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 5
Number of Saturdays: 0
Number of Sundays: 0
Surveys manually removed from selection: 1