trehalose 6-phosphate positively regulates fatty acid biosynthesis …€¦ · 24/09/2018 · t6p...
TRANSCRIPT
1
RESEARCH ARTICLE 1
Trehalose 6-Phosphate Positively Regulates Fatty Acid Synthesis by 2
Stabilizing WRINKLED1 3
Zhiyang Zhai1*
, Jantana Keereetaweep1*
, Hui Liu1, Regina Feil
2, John E. Lunn
2, John Shanklin
1# 4
1Dept of Biology, BNL 463, 50 Bell Ave, Upton NY 11973, USA 5
2Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, 6 Germany 7
#Corresponding author: [email protected] 8
*ZZ and JK contributed equally to this work.9
Short Title: Mechanism of T6P-regulated fatty acid biosynthesis 10
One Sentence Summary: Trehalose 6-phosphate binds to the KIN10 subunit of SnRK1 and inhibits it in 11 a GRIK-dependent manner, positively regulating fatty acid synthesis by stabilizing WRINKLED1. 12
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in 13 accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: John 14 Shanklin ([email protected]). 15
16
ABSTRACT 17 WRINKLED1 (WRI1), the transcriptional activator of fatty acid synthesis, was recently identified as a 18 target of KIN10, a catalytic α-subunit of the SUCROSE-NON-FERMENTING-1-RELATED PROTEIN 19 KINASE-1 (SnRK1). We tested the hypothesis that trehalose 6-phosphate (T6P), a signal of cellular 20 sucrose status, can regulate fatty acid synthesis by inhibiting SnRK1. Incubation of Brassica napus 21 suspension cells in medium containing T6P, or overexpression of the Escherichia coli T6P synthase, 22 OtsA, in Nicotiana benthamiana, significantly increased T6P levels, WRI1 levels and FA synthesis rates. 23 T6P directly bound to purified recombinant KIN10 with an equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) of 32 ± 24 6 μM based on microscale thermophoresis. GEMINIVIRUS REP-INTERACTING KINASE1 (GRIK1) 25 bound to KIN10 (Kd 19 ± 3 μM) and activated it by phosphorylation. In the presence of T6P, the GRIK1-26 KIN10 association was weakened by more than threefold (Kd 67.7 ± 9.8 μM) which reduced both the 27 phosphorylation of KIN10 and its activity. T6P-dependent inhibition of SnRK1 activity was reduced in 28 extracts of individual Arabidopsis grik1 and grik2 mutants relative to wild type, while SnRK1 activity in 29 grik1 grik2 extracts was enhanced by T6P. These results indicate that the T6P sensitivity of SnRK1 in 30 vivo is GRIK1/GRIK2-dependent. Based on our findings, we propose a mechanistic model that links 31 sugar signaling and FA homeostasis. 32
33
34
Plant Cell Advance Publication. Published on September 24, 2018, doi:10.1105/tpc.18.00521
2
INTRODUCTION 35
Lipids are primary metabolites in cells, acting as structural components of cell membranes, energy-dense 36
storage compounds and cell signaling molecules. Fatty acids are major components of lipids and 37
triacylglycerols (TAGs) are storage lipids that accumulate mostly in oil bodies in plants (Li-Beisson et al., 38
2013). Imported sugar provides substrates including carbon skeletons in the form of acetyl-CoA, ATP and 39
reductants (NADPH) for de novo fatty acid synthesis in sink organs. Several lines of evidence have 40
identified links between sucrose (Suc) levels and fatty acid synthesis. For example, wrinkled seed (rr), 41
the classical Mendel pea mutant in which a gene encoding a starch-branching enzyme is disrupted by a 42
transposon-like insertion, showed both higher levels of Suc and increased lipid accumulation 43
(Bhattacharyya et al., 1990). A 3-fold increase in Suc and a 30% increase in leaf TAG accumulation are 44
observed in leaves of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) in which starch synthesis is decreased by RNAi-45
mediated suppression of the small subunit of AGPase (ADG1) (Sanjaya et al., 2011). In addition, 46
Arabidopsis exhibits a 4-fold TAG increase in roots when cultured on one-half-strength MS medium 47
supplemented with 5% Suc, compared to medium without Suc (Kelly et al., 2013). To test the influence 48
of endogenous sugar content on FA and TAG accumulation, we generated a high-leaf-sugar mutant by 49
simultaneously restricting sucrose phloem loading and blocking starch synthesis by crossing the suc2 50
(encoding a Suc/H+ symporter that loads Suc into phloem) mutant (Srivastava et al., 2008) and an adg1 51
mutant (Lin et al., 1988). The sugar content (combined glucose (Glc) and Suc) in adg1 suc2 leaves was 52
80-fold higher than that of WT and TAG accumulation increased more than 10-fold with respect to WT to53
1% of dry weight, demonstrating a strong positive relationship between sugar accumulation and TAG 54
accumulation (Zhai et al., 2017b). 55
That sugars play dual roles in providing carbon skeletons and sugar signaling is well established for the 56
synthesis of starch (Nakamura et al., 1991; Harn et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2001; Nagata et al., 2012), 57
fructans (Nagaraj et al., 2001; Noël et al., 2001) and anthocyanins (Tiessen et al., 2002). There is 58
increasing evidence that sugar signaling is also important in regulating lipid synthesis. For example, 59
glucose and fructose are necessary for seedlings ectopically overexpressing WRINKLED 1 (WRI1) to 60
accumulate TAG (Cernac and Benning, 2004). WRI1 is an APETALA2 (AP2) transcriptional factor that 61
induces the expression of more than 20 genes involved in glycolysis and fatty acid synthesis (Cernac and 62
Benning, 2004; Maeo et al., 2009; Ma et al., 2013). WRI1 expression is enhanced by Suc in Arabidopsis 63
leaves (Masaki et al., 2005). Sanjaya et al. (2011) also observed that the expression of WRI1 in seedling 64
of AGP-deficient lines is increased compared to wild type. However, in the Arabidopsis adg1 suc2 65
mutant, WRI1 expression is not significantly different from wild type, but the abundance of the WRI1 66
protein is increased due to its stabilization (Zhai et al., 2017b). Sugar-dependent regulation of WRI1 67
3
expression and WRI1 protein stability implies that sugar signaling is involved in regulating lipid (TAG) 68
synthesis. 69
Previously, we reported that a catalytic -subunit of SnRK1, KIN10, can directly phosphorylate WRI1 70
within its two AP2 DNA-binding domains (Zhai et al., 2017a), close to the previously identified 14-3-3 71
binding sites (Ma et al., 2016), initiating its proteasomal degradation. This finding is consistent with 72
observations from adg1 suc2 that high sugar levels post-translationally stabilize WRI1. In the plant cell, 73
SnRK1 is an important metabolic sensor that is activated when sugars are low, resulting in metabolic 74
reprogramming that leads to a general inhibition of catabolism and stimulation of anabolism (Baena-75
González et al., 2007). The catalytic activity of the heterotrimeric (//) SnRK1 complex resides in its 76
subunits, which in Arabidopsis are encoded by KIN10, KIN11 and SnRK1.3. These subunits are 77
activated by phosphorylation of threonine 175 (T175) (or its equivalent) within their T-loops (Estruch et 78
al., 1992; Hawley et al., 1996; Shen et al., 2009). The degree of T-loop phosphorylation reflects the 79
metabolic status of the cell; under low-energy/sugar or stress conditions it becomes phosphorylated and 80
thereby activated. Conversely, under favorable, i.e., high-energy/sugar conditions, T-loop 81
phosphorylation is reversed, leading to a decrease in KIN10 activity. In plants, GEMINIVIRUS REP-82
INTERACTING KINASE1 (GRIK1) and GRIK2 are responsible for phosphorylating T175 in KIN10 83
(Shen et al., 2009; Glab et al., 2017), whereas protein phosphatases ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE1 84
(ABI1) and PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE TYPE 2CA (PP2CA) mediate its dephosphorylation (Rodrigues 85
et al., 2013). It has also been reported that activated SnRK1 can phosphorylate and moderate the activity 86
of GRIKs, providing a potential feedback control mechanism to regulate SnRK1 activation (Crozet et al., 87
2010). 88
Trehalose 6-phosphate (T6P) acts as a signal of sucrose availability connecting plant growth and 89
development to its metabolic status (Schluepmann et al., 2003; Lunn et al., 2006; Yadav et al., 2014; 90
Figueroa and Lunn, 2016). T6P is synthesized by the action of T6P synthase (TPS) on two activated 91
forms of Glc, UDP-Glc (UDPG) and Glc 6-phosphate (G6P), both of which are central to plant 92
metabolism (Cabib and Leloir, 1958). SnRK1 activity in crude extracts from developing Arabidopsis 93
tissues is inhibited by T6P, and this inhibition depends on unknown protein factor(s) principally 94
expressed in young tissues (Zhang et al., 2009; Martínez-Barajas et al., 2011; Griffiths et al., 2016). T6P 95
levels are quite variable with respect to organism, tissue types, developmental states, and can exhibit 96
dynamic responses to environmental cues. Several reports from Arabidopsis and maize (Zea mays) have 97
estimated T6P to be present in the low (4-47) micromolar range (Martins et al., 2013; Nuccio et al., 98
2015). However, as T6P is probably not distributed homogeneously in the tissues analyzed, these values 99
should be regarded as minimum estimates of the in vivo concentrations of T6P. 100
4
Because WRI1 is a direct target of KIN10 and T6P is a potent inhibitor of SnRK1, we tested the 101
hypothesis that T6P can regulate fatty acid synthesis via inhibition of SnRK1 and subsequent stabilization 102
of WRI1. Data from experiments employing exogenous T6P treatment, or overexpression of TPS to 103
elevate T6P levels, provided support for the hypothesis. Further, we observed direct binding between T6P 104
and purified recombinant KIN10 and quantitated their interaction. To do this we used microscale 105
thermophoresis (MST), a biophysical technique which provides precise equilibrium dissociation constants 106
(Kds) for protein-protein and protein-ligand interactions (Wienken et al., 2010; Baaske et al., 2011). 107
Using both MST and genetic approaches employing grik mutants, we demonstrated that T6P weakens the 108
GRIK-KIN10 association i.e., increases the equilibrium dissociation constant by more than threefold, 109
identifying it as a mediator for T6P-dependent inhibition of SnRK1. 110
111
RESULTS 112
T6P positively regulates fatty acid biosynthesis by stabilizing WRI1 in Brassica napus suspension 113
cells 114
To test the regulatory effect of T6P on fatty acid biosynthesis, a microspore-derived cell suspension 115
culture of Brassica napus L. cv. Jet Neuf (subsequently referred to as B. napus) (Supplemental Fig. 1) 116
was used because it is a well-established model system for developing oilseeds (Shi et al., 2008; Andre et 117
al., 2012). Because T6P does not efficiently penetrate the cell walls of intact plants (Griffiths et al., 2016), 118
we exposed B. napus suspension cells to relatively high levels (100 µM) of T6P. This led to a rise in 119
intracellular T6P levels after 3 h of T6P exposure, compared to cells incubated in the presence of the 120
same concentration of sucrose or sorbitol (Fig. 1A), indicating that under our experimental conditions B. 121
napus suspension cells are able to take up exogenous T6P. 122
A KIN10 kinase activity assay was performed using a sucrose-phosphate synthase (SPS)-derived target 123
peptide containing the KIN10-phosphorylation-target-sequence (Bhalerao et al., 1999). KIN10 activity 124
was 40% lower in T6P-treated cells relative to sucrose-treated cells after 2 d of treatment (Fig. 1B). We 125
next investigated the effects of T6P treatment on WRI1. As shown in Fig. 1C, WRI1 accumulated to 126
approximately 3-fold higher levels in T6P-treated cells relative to either sucrose- or sorbitol-treated 127
controls after 2 d of treatment. Consistent with the observed increase in WRI1, total fatty acid levels 128
increased by more than 30% in T6P-treated cells relative to sucrose- or sorbitol-treated controls after 2 d 129
(Fig. 1D). 130
It was previously reported that high concentrations of sucrose stabilize WRI1 and favor fatty acid 131
synthesis (Zhai et al., 2017b). We found that incubation in medium containing 100 mM sucrose stabilized 132
WRI1 and increased total fatty acid accumulation in B. napus suspension cells to a similar degree as 133
5
incubation with 100 µM T6P (Supplemental Fig. 2), consistent with previous reports that T6P is more 134
potent than sucrose in regulating SnRK1 (Zhang et al., 2009). 135
136
Overexpression of a bacterial trehalose 6-phosphate synthase increases de novo fatty acid 137
biosynthesis in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves 138
An alternative approach to increasing T6P content in plants is by heterologous expression of the 139
Escherichia coli trehalose 6-phosphate synthase (TPS), OtsA which converts UDPG and G6P to T6P 140
(Schluepmann et al., 2003). To test whether T6P positively regulates fatty acid synthesis in plant 141
vegetative tissue, OtsA was transiently expressed in leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana. After 3 d, T6P 142
levels were elevated by 1,000-fold relative to empty vector (EV) controls (Fig. 2A). Consistent with the 143
observation in T6P-treated B. napus cells, KIN10 activity in leaves expressing OtsA was significantly 144
lower than EV controls (Fig. 2B). OtsA-expressing leaves also accumulated significantly higher levels of 145
TAG and total fatty acids than EV controls (Fig. 2C and 2D). To test whether higher TAG accumulation 146
in OtsA-expressing leaves resulted from de novo fatty acid biosynthesis, we performed [1-14C] acetate 147
labeling studies in N. benthamiana leaves. The rate of fatty acid synthesis in leaves expressing OtsA was 148
29% higher than in leaves expressing EV (Fig. 2E). 149
150
T6P specifically binds to Arabidopsis KIN10 and weakens its association with GRIK1 151
Next, we set out to determine how T6P inhibits SnRK1 to further understand the regulation of fatty acid 152
synthesis by T6P. We tested the hypothesis that T6P directly binds to KIN10 and regulates its activity. 153
As a first step, we used microscale thermophoresis (MST) analysis to evaluate whether T6P, sucrose, 154
sucrose-6ʹ-P, sorbitol or trehalose could bind to purified recombinant KIN10. Only T6P showed evidence 155
of binding to KIN10 when each of the sugars were presented at 50 µM (Table 1, Fig. 3, and Supplemental 156
Fig. 3). We also tested the possibility that T6P competes with ATP in binding to KIN10. The binding of 157
T6P with KIN10 was compared for native KIN10 and a previously described KIN10 ATP-binding 158
mutant, K48A (Shen et al., 2009). As expected, KIN10 (K48A) did not bind ATP; however, it retained 159
the ability to bind T6P, suggesting T6P likely binds at a site distinct from the ATP-binding site on KIN10 160
(Table 1). 161
A detailed MST study was performed to quantitate the binding of T6P to KIN10, in which serial dilutions 162
of T6P were titrated against KIN10. The data were used to calculate an equilibrium dissociation constant 163
(Kd) of 32.0 ± 5.6 µM (Fig. 3 and Table 2), demonstrating a direct interaction between T6P and KIN10 164
similar to that determined for ATP (Table 2). The observation that the Kd for ATP was unchanged in the 165
presence of 50 µM T6P shows that ATP and T6P bind at different sites of KIN10 (Table 2). 166
6
In plants, GRIK1 and GRIK2 can bind to KIN10 and phosphorylate it, resulting in its activation (Shen 167
and Hanley-Bowdoin, 2006; Shen et al., 2009), so we tested whether T6P can also bind to purified 168
GRIK1 (Supplemental Fig. 4). MST analysis showed that T6P does not interact directly with GRIK1 169
(Table 2). To investigate whether the inhibition of SnRK1 activity by T6P is related to GRIK1 activation 170
of KIN10, we tested whether the binding of T6P to KIN10 affected the equilibrium dissociation constant 171
between KIN10 and GRIK1. In the absence of T6P, GRIK1 bound to KIN10 with a Kd of 19.6 ± 2.5 µM 172
(Fig. 3 and Table 2), whereas in the presence of 50 µM T6P, the Kd between GRIK1 and KIN10 173
increased significantly (Student’s t-test, P<0.05) by 3.5-fold to 67.7 ± 9.8 µM (Fig. 3 and Table 2). These 174
results demonstrate that binding of T6P to KIN10 significantly weakens the interaction between GRIK1 175
and KIN10. 176
177
T6P decreases KIN10 phosphorylation and suppresses its activity in the presence of GRIK1 178
The results showing T6P weakens the interaction between GRIK1 and KIN10 prompted us to quantitate 179
the effects of T6P on the GRIK1-dependent T-loop phosphorylation of KIN10, which in turn mediates its 180
activation. 32P phosphorylation assays were conducted using purified preparations of GRIK1 and KIN10 181
in the presence or absence of various sugars (Fig. 4). Under the assay conditions, phosphorylation of 182
KIN10 was strictly dependent on GRIK1 (Fig. 4A). The inclusion of T6P strongly suppressed GRIK1-183
dependent phosphorylation of KIN10, while sucrose or sorbitol had no discernable effect relative to the 184
sugar-free control (Fig. 4A). In the absence of KIN10, autophosphorylation of GRIK1 appears to be 185
minimally influenced by the presence or absence of sugars (Fig. 4A). 186
As described above, GRIK-dependent phosphorylation of KIN10 results in its activation. We therefore 187
evaluated KIN10 activity in the presence or absence of sugars using the well-established SPS peptide 188
phosphorylation assay (Fig. 4B, in its linear range (Supplemental Fig. 5)). GRIK1-dependent KIN10 189
phosphorylation of the SPS peptide was significantly suppressed (Student’s t-test, P<0.05) by 190
approximately 50% in the presence of T6P (Fig. 4B). In the absence of GRIK1, KIN10 phosphorylation 191
of SPS peptide was reduced by approximately 5-fold, and did not show the T6P-dependent inhibition 192
observed for KIN10 phosphorylation in the presence of GRIK1. Indeed, we made an unexpected 193
observation that KIN10 phosphorylation of the SPS peptide was stimulated approximately 25% upon the 194
inclusion of T6P (Fig. 4B). 195
196
T6P treatment decreases KIN10 phosphorylation in Brassica napus suspension cells 197
To test the effect of T6P on KIN10 in vivo, B. napus cells were incubated with 100 µM T6P, sucrose or 198
sorbitol for 1 or 2 days. Total proteins were extracted from cells and specific antibodies were used to 199
detect T-loop phosphorylated KIN10 (P-KIN10) (Nukarinen et al., 2016), KIN10 (Rodrigues et al., 2013), 200
7
and GRIK1 (Shen and Hanley-Bowdoin, 2006). As shown in Fig. 5, phosphorylated KIN10 levels were 201
substantially reduced relative to sorbitol-treated cells, while total KIN10 protein levels were quite similar 202
across the treatments. This pattern is consistent with the decreases in GRIK1-dependent KIN10 203
phosphorylation in the presence of T6P observed for in vitro protein phosphorylation assays employing 204
isolated purified enzymes described above (Fig. 4). 205
206
In Arabidopsis, T6P inhibition of SnRK1 is GRIK1- and GRIK2-dependent 207
As described above, T6P inhibits GRIK1-dependent KIN10 activation in assays containing recombinant 208
GRIK1and KIN10. To further explore these interactions, Arabidopsis grik1, grik2 and grik1 grik2 null 209
mutants (Glab et al., 2017) were used to test whether T6P inhibition of SnRK1 is GRIK1- and GRIK2-210
dependent in planta (Supplemental Fig. 6). SnRK1 activity in extracts of 12-d-old seedlings of grik1 211
grik2 was only 26% of wild type (Fig. 6), which is consistent with published findings that the 212
phosphorylated form of KIN10 is undetectable in the grik1 grik2 double mutant (Glab et al., 2017). 213
Inclusion of 100 µM T6P (i.e., approximately 3-fold the Kd) significantly inhibited SnRK1 activity in 214
crude extracts of wild type, grik1 and grik2 by 60%, 24% and 39%, respectively, but no inhibition was 215
observed for extracts of the grik1 grik2 double mutant. Indeed, SnRK1 activity was significantly 216
activated (by approx. 2-fold) in the presence of 100 µM T6P, consistent with the in vitro assays described 217
above employing purified KIN10 in the absence of GRIK1. 218
219
DISCUSSION 220
Accumulated evidence has established a role for sugar signaling in regulating lipid synthesis. The recent 221
discovery that SnRK1, a key metabolic sensor in plants, phosphorylates WRI1 and promotes its 222
proteasomal degradation connects plant metabolic status with fatty acid synthesis (Zhai et al., 2017a). In 223
developing tissues, SnRK1 is reported to be inhibited by T6P (Zhang et al., 2009), a signal of cellular 224
sucrose status (Lunn et al., 2006), by an unknown mechanism that involves undefined protein factor(s). In 225
this work, we showed that T6P positively regulates fatty acid synthesis in B. napus cells and N. 226
benthamiana leaves by incubation in medium supplemented with T6P, and overexpression of a bacterial 227
TPS, OtsA, respectively. Both treatments significantly elevated tissue T6P levels and stabilization of 228
WRI1. These findings are consistent with previous observations that T6P inhibits SnRK1, and that 229
SnRK1 in turn suppresses WRI1 via phosphorylation that predisposes the WRI1 protein to targeted for 230
degradation (Zhai et al., 2017a). 231
That T6P has been postulated to play a global role in sugar signaling and homeostasis (Lunn et al., 2006; 232
Figueroa and Lunn, 2016) led us to ask how T6P was inhibiting SnRK1 in this study. In a surprise 233
finding, we discovered that T6P binds directly to KIN10 and that this binding weakens the interaction 234
8
between KIN10 and GRIK1. We therefore propose a model for T6P-regulated plant fatty acid synthesis in 235
which GRIK is a factor that mediates T6P inhibition of SnRK1 (Fig. 7). According to the model, in cells 236
with low sucrose and T6P levels, GRIK associates with KIN10 and phosphorylates its activation loop. 237
This enhances SnRK1 activity and the phosphorylation of its many targets including WRI1, which 238
predisposes it to proteasomal degradation, thereby downregulating fatty acid synthesis, and reducing 239
cellular demand for energy and reductant. Alternatively, when sugars and T6P are abundant, T6P binds to 240
KIN10, reducing its affinity for GRIK, lowering the likelihood of KIN10 activation loop phosphorylation. 241
SnRK1 activity thus decreases and less WRI1 becomes phosphorylated and degraded, resulting in 242
increased WRI1 accumulation, thereby up-regulating fatty acid synthesis. 243
Several lines of evidence to support this model. 1) T6P feeding to B. napus cells or transient expression of 244
OtsA in N. benthamiana leaves resulted in elevated T6P levels and significantly increased fatty acid 245
content. 2) [1-14C]acetate labeling of N. benthamiana leaves expressing OtsA showed that increased fatty 246
acid and TAG accumulation resulted from higher a higher rates of de novo fatty acid synthesis. 3) 247
Increased WRI1 protein levels were observed in tissues with elevated levels of T6P. 4) T6P bound to 248
KIN10, a catalytic subunit of SnRK1 with a Kd within the published physiological range. 5) There was a 249
3.5-fold reduction in the association between GRIK1 and KIN10 in the presence of physiologically-250
relevant concentrations of T6P. 6) The incubation of B. napus cells in the presence of T6P led to a 251
reduction of T-loop activation of KIN10 and of its activity. 7) The reduction in KIN10 activity in the 252
presence of T6P was strictly GRIK1-dependent in reconstitution experiments employing bacterially-253
expressed and purified KIN10 and GRIK1. 8) Extracts from young Arabidopsis leaves of wild type and 254
grik mutants exhibited GRIK-dependent T6P inhibition of SnRK1 activity, consistent with the purified 255
GRIK1/KIN10 reconstitution experiments. 256
The observed reduction of binding affinity between GRIK1 and KIN10 in the presence of T6P can be 257
attributed to T6P binding to KIN10 because T6P specifically binds to KIN10 but not GRIK1. We initially 258
considered the possibility that T6P inhibited KIN10 activity by competing with its ATP binding site, but 259
rejected the idea because T6P did not change the binding constant for ATP, consistent with previous 260
reports based on assays in crude extracts (Zhang et al., 2009). In principle, the observed T6P-dependent 261
increase in equilibrium dissociation constant for the KIN10 and GRIK1 association could result from a 262
reduction in complex formation or an increase in its propensity to dissociate. How T6P interacts with 263
KIN10 and how that in turn affects the interaction between KIN10 and GRIK1 is presently unknown. It 264
is possible that T6P binds to a domain on KIN10 that overlaps with its GRIK1 interaction interface 265
directly, or alternatively, T6P could bind to a remote site on KIN10 causing a conformational change that 266
allosterically reduces the strength of the GRIK1-KIN10 interaction indirectly. Future structural studies 267
will be required to distinguish between these possibilities. 268
9
The discovery that T6P binds to KIN10 initially led us to hypothesize the simplest scenario, i.e., that T6P 269
binding directly inhibits its catalytic activity. To test this hypothesis, assays were performed to measure 270
the phosphorylation activity of KIN10 in the presence or absence of T6P using the well-established SPS 271
peptide substrate. These experiments employing bacterially-expressed and purified KIN10 yielded the 272
apparently paradoxical result that in the absence of GRIK1, T6P reproducibly activated, rather than 273
repressed, KIN10 activity. Subsequent experiments with extracts of young leaves from the grik1 grik2 274
double mutant corroborated the activation of KIN10 by T6P in the absence of GRIK activity. Thus, 275
KIN10 is subject to two apparently opposing effects with respect to T6P: in the presence of GRIK, T6P 276
binding weakened the GRIK-KIN10 interaction decreasing T-loop phosphorylation and activation of 277
KIN10, whereas in the absence of GRIK, T6P binding resulted in a small enhancement of KIN10 activity. 278
Thus, under conditions favoring the accumulation of GRIK proteins, e.g., developing tissues, source 279
tissues or under some stress condition such as viral infection (Shen and Hanley-Bowdoin, 2006), the 280
GRIK-dependent inhibitory effect would predominate, resulting in net inhibition of SnRK1 activity by 281
T6P. 282
The findings presented herein suggest a plant-specific mechanism in which SnRK1 senses cellular 283
metabolic status changes through T6P. The sensitivity of SnRK1 to T6P and other sugar-phosphates 284
(Glc6P and Glc1P; Nunes et al., 2013), and its insensitivity to AMP (Emanuelle et al., 2015), are 285
consistent with SnRK1 acting as a general metabolic sensor, in contrast to its animal homologue, the 286
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which is primarily a sensor of energy status. Showing how 287
SnRK1 activity is influenced by sucrose status via T6P provides insights into the evolution of the plant-288
specific function of SnRK1 relative to its animal (AMPK) and yeast (SNF1) homologues. The details of 289
WRI1 stabilization by T6P and its consequences for lipid synthesis underscore the complexity of SnRK1 290
regulation, which likely evolved due to its central role in integrating diverse cellular inputs and mediating 291
cellular responses that contribute to metabolic and energy homeostasis (Sheen, 2014). 292
In summary, we recently identified SnRK1 as a regulator of WRI1(Zhai et al., 2017a) and established a 293
key role for sugar beyond simply supplying carbon skeletons for fatty acid synthesis by inhibiting 294
SnRK1-dependent WRI1 phosphorylation, which predisposes it for degradation. The present work adds a 295
new layer of mechanistic detail to this sugar signaling pathway by identifying a role for T6P, a key sugar-296
signaling intermediate. T6P reduces SnRK1 activity by binding to KIN10 and weakening its interaction 297
with GRIK1 (its activating kinase), thus reducing SnRK1 activity, WRI1 phosphorylation and 298
degradation, thereby stimulating fatty acid synthesis. 299
300
301
302
10
METHODS 303
304
Plant Materials and Growth Conditions 305
Arabidopsis (Columbia-0) grik1 (snak2), grik2 (snak1), and grik1 (+/−) grik2 (−/−) sesqui mutants were 306
obtained from Nathalie Glab (Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay, France) (Glab et al., 2017). For 307
experiments with the grik1 grik2 double mutants, double homozygous null individuals grik1(-/-) grik2(-/-) 308
were selected from the progeny of the grik1(+/-) grik2(-/-) sesqui parental line as described in 309
Supplemental Fig. 6. Arabidopsis seeds were surface-sterilized and selected on agar plates containing 310
half-strength Murashige and Skoog salts. After one week, seedlings were transplanted to moist soil (seed 311
BM2 mix, Berger, Saint-Modeste, Canada). All plants (Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana) were 312
grown with a 16h-light/8h-dark photoperiod (combination of cool white fluorescent lamps and 313
incandescent lamps, at a photosynthetic photon flux density of 250 μmol m-2 s-1) with a 23°/19°C 314
day/night, 16h/8h temperature regime and approximately 75% relative humidity. 315
316
Genetic Constructs 317
The OtsA coding regions were amplified by PCR from E. coli genomic DNA using primer pairs listed in 318
Supplemental Table 1. The PCR products were then cloned into the Invitrogen GATEWAYM 319
pDONR/Zeo vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA; www.thermofisher.com) using the BP 320
reaction and sub-cloned (LR reaction) into the plant GATEWAYTM binary vector pGWB414 (Nakagawa 321
et al., 2007). Expression vectors for the recombinant His6-tagged kinase domain of Arabidopsis KIN10, 322
KIN10 (K48A) and KIN10 (T175A) were obtained from Wei Shen (North Carolina State University, US) 323
(Shen et al., 2009). The GRIK1 expression vector for producing recombinant His6-tagged GRIK1 protein 324
was previously described (Zhai et al., 2017a). 325
326
Expression and Purification of Recombinant KIN10 and GRIK1 327
Recombinant KIN10 (including KIN10 (K48A) and KIN10 (T175A)) and GRIK1 proteins with N- 328
terminal His6-tags were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3). Protein purification was performed as described 329
by Shen et al. (2009). Briefly, 1 L of LB medium was inoculated with 10 ml of a saturated growth E. coli 330
culture, incubated at 37°C with shaking at 225 RPM until its optical density at 600 nm reached 0.6, at 331
which time the temperature of the culture was reduced by cooling on ice for 30 min before the addition of 332
isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 0.4 mM. The culture was 333
incubated for a further 16 h at 16°C. Cells were collected by centrifugation at 6000 ×g for 15 min at 4°C 334
and re-suspended in a lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 M NaCl, 10 mM imidazole 335
and 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100. The cells were disrupted by triple passage through an EmulsiFlex-C3 336
11
(Avestin, Canada; www.avestin.com) at 1000 PSI (6894 kPa). The cell lysate was clarified by 337
centrifugation at 15,000 ×g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was applied to a 2 mL Ni-NTA resin 338
column (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany; www.qiagen.com) equilibrated with lysis buffer supplemented. The 339
column was washed twice with five column volumes of lysis buffer and once with wash buffer (20 mM 340
Tris-HCl, pH8.0, 0.5 M NaCl, 30 mM imidazole, 0.1% (v/v) Triton-X100), and then bound proteins were 341
eluted with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 M NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol supplemented with 500 mM 342
imidazole. The eluted protein samples were desalted using an Econo-Pac® 10DG Chromatography 343
Column (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA; www.bio-rad.com) into 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 M NaCl, 50% 344
glycerol, 1 mM DTT. Protein preparations were separated into aliquots and stored at -20°C until use. 345
346
MicroScale Thermophoresis (MST) 347
Sucrose, sucrose-6ʹ-P, trehalose, sorbitol, and ATP were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. T6P (Purity ≥ 348
95%, CAS#:136632-28-5) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Thermophoretic assays were 349
conducted using a Monolith NT.115 apparatus (NanoTemperTechnologies, South San Francisco, CA; 350
nanotempertech.com). Target proteins (KIN10 and GRIK1) were fluorescently labeled according to the 351
protocol for N-hydroxysuccinimide coupling of the dye NT647 (NanoTemper Technologies) to lysine 352
residues. Target protein and dye were incubated on ice for 30 min. Free dye was separated from labeled 353
protein by size-exclusion chromatography using MST buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 354
10 MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, and 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20). For binding tests, 100 nM target protein 355
(fluorescently labeled) was incubated with 50 μM unlabeled ligand for 10 min prior to the measurement. 356
To determine Kds, 100 nM target protein was incubated with a serial dilution of the ligand. Samples of 357
approximately 10 μl were loaded into capillaries and inserted into the MST instrument loading tray 358
(Monolith NT.115). The thermophoresis experiments were carried out using 40% MST power and 80% 359
LED power at 25 °C. Fifty µM T6P was included to test its effect on the associations of KIN10 with ATP 360
or GRIK1. 361
362
Protein Phosphorylation Assay 363
The in vitro protein phosphorylation assay was performed according to Shen et al. (2009). Briefly, a 25-364
µL assay was performed with 1 µg of KIN10 and 1 µg of GRIK1 in Reaction Buffer: 25 mM Tris-HCl, 365
pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM ATP, and 92.5 kBq [γ-32P] ATP (PerkinElmer, Waltham, 366
MA; www.perkinelmer.com) at 30°C for 20 min. The reaction was terminated by addition of 5 µL of 367
6×SDS-poly acrylamide gel electrophoresis loading buffer. A 10-µL aliquot of each assay was separated 368
by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. 32P-labeled proteins were 369
visualized by autoradiography employing a phosphor screen in conjunction with a TyphoonTM FLA 7000 370
12
imager (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Rahway, NJ; www.gelifesciences.com). For phosphorylation 371
assays supplemented with sucrose, T6P or sorbitol, 1 mM of each was added to the reaction mix 372
containing KIN10, and incubated on ice for 5 min before GRIK1 was added to the reaction. 373
374
SnRK1 (KIN10) Activity Assay 375
Plant soluble protein extraction and SnRK1 activity assays were performed according to the methods 376
described (Ananieva et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2009). Briefly, 50 mg (fresh weight) of suspension cells or 377
plant tissues were extracted in 100 µL of ice-cold Homogenization Buffer: 100 mM Tricine-NaOH, pH 378
8.0, 25 mM NaF, 5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 1 mM benzamidine, 1 mM 379
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1×protease inhibitor cocktail (P9599, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MI; 380
www.sigmaaldrich.com), 1× phosphatase inhibitors (PhosStopTM, Roche Life Science, Penzberg, 381
Germany; lifescience.roche.com), 2% (v/v) [or (w/v)] insoluble polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP). The 382
homogenate was centrifuged at 13,000 ×g at 4°C for 15 min before spin-desalting of the supernatant (50 383
µL) (IllustraTMMicroSpinTM G-25 micro columns, GE Healthcare Life Science). Protein concentration 384
was measured with Bradford reagent (B6916, Sigma) using bovine serum albumin as standard. A 25-µL 385
assay was assembled with 10 µg total protein per sample in Kinase Reaction buffer: 50 mM HEPES-386
NaOH, pH7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM SPS peptide (RDHMPRIRSEMQIWSED), 4 mM DTT, 0.5 µM 387
okadaic acid, 0.2 mM ATP, 12.2 kBq [γ-32P] ATP and incubated at 30°C for 5 min. The assay was 388
stopped by blotting 10 µL per reaction on 4-cm2 squares of Whatman P81 Phosphocellulose paper 389
(Whatman, Maidstone, UK; www.gelifesciences.com/whatman), immersed in 1% (v/v) phosphoric acid, 390
then washed with four 800-mL volumes of 1% phosphoric acid, immersed in acetone, dried, and 391
transferred to liquid scintillation vials. Radioactivity associated with phosphorylated SPS peptide was 392
determined by liquid scintillation counting using a Tri-carb (PerkinElmer). 393
For the purified KIN10 activity assay, 0.05 µg KIN10 or 0.05 µg KIN10 and 0.05 µg GRIK1 were 394
included in Kinase Reaction Buffer. For KIN10 kinase activity assays supplemented with sugars, 1 mM 395
of sucrose, T6P or sorbitol, was added to KIN10 and incubated on ice for 5 min before GRIK1was added 396
to the reaction. 397
398
Cell Culture Growth 399
Brassica napus cv Jet Neuf suspension cell cultures were grown in NLN medium (containing 3% sucrose) 400
as previously described (Shi et al., 2008). Prior to experiments suspension cell cultures were maintained 401
in liquid media for 7 days with media being refreshed every 2 days. For sugar treatments, cell cultures 402
were subsequently cultured on NLN solid media (containing 1% (w/v) sucrose and 8 g/L tissue culture 403
grade agar) supplemented with 100 µM of different types of sugars: sucrose, sorbitol, or T6P. Cells were 404
13
collected after 8 hours, 1, 2, and 4 days, by filtration, rinsed three times with water, flash frozen, and 405
stored at 80°C until use. 406
407
408
409
T6P Quantification 410
Water-soluble metabolites were extracted from aliquots (10-20 mg) of frozen tissue powder using 411
chloroform-methanol (Lunn et al., 2006) and evaporated to dryness using a centrifugal vacuum drier. The 412
dried extract was dissolved in 350 µL purified H2O and filtered through MultiScreen PCR-96 Filter Plate 413
membranes (Merck Millipore; www.merckmillipore.com) to remove high molecular weight compounds. 414
T6P, phosphorylated intermediates and organic acids were measured by high performance anion-415
exchange chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry as described by Lunn et al. (Lunn et al., 416
2006), with modifications as described in Figueroa et al. (2016). 417
418
TAG and Total Fatty Acid Quantification 419
Total lipids (TAG plus polar lipids) were isolated from 100 mg of freshly harvested leaf tissue by the 420
addition of 700 µl of methanol:chloroform:formic acid (2:1:0.1, by volume) by vigorous shaking for 30 421
min, after which 1 ml of 1 M KCl, 0.2 M H3PO4 was added. After mixing, the samples were centrifuged 422
at 1,500 ×g (4°C) and total lipids were collected in the lower phase (chloroform). For TAG quantification, 423
60 µl of total lipid were separated by Silica Gel 60 (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA; 424
www.emdmillipore.com) TLC developed with hexane:diethyl ether:acetic acid (70:30:1, by volume) and 425
visualized by spraying with 0.05% (w/v) primuline (in 80% (v/v) acetone). TAG fractions identified 426
under UV light were scraped from the plate and transmethylated to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) by 427
incubation in 1 ml 12% (w/w) boron trichloride in methanol at 85°C for 40 min. For total fatty acid 428
quantification, 10 µl of total lipids were directly transmethylated with boron trichloride-methanol as 429
described above. For both assays, 5 µg heptadecanoic acid (C17:0) was added as internal standard prior to 430
transmethylation. FAMEs were extracted into hexane and dried under a nitrogen stream before being 431
dissolved in 100 µl hexane and analyzed by GC-MS with an Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA; 432
www.agilent.com) 7890A GC System equipped with an Agilent 60m DB23 capillary column (ID 250-433
μm) and a 5975C mass selective detector. 434
435
In vivo [1-14
C] Acetate Labeling 436
Labeling experiments were performed essentially as described by Koo et al. (2004). N. benthamiana 437
leaves were incubated in 25 mM MES-NaOH, pH 5.7 buffer containing 0.01% (w/v) Tween-20 as wetting 438
14
agent under illumination (180 µmol m-2 s-1) at 25°C. Labeling was initiated by the addition of 370 kBq of 439
sodium [1-14C] acetate solution (2.15 GBq/mmol, American Radiolabeled Chemicals, St Louis, MO; 440
www.arcincusa.com). Labeling was terminated by removal of the medium from the leaf, and the sample 441
was washed three times with water. Total lipids were extracted and separated as described above. 442
Radioactivity associated with total lipids was determined by liquid scintillation counting using a Tri-carb 443
instrument (PerkinElmer). 444
445
Agroinfiltration of Nicotiana Benthamiana 446
Transient gene expression in N. benthamiana by agroinfiltration was accomplished using a previously 447
described procedure (Ohad and Yalovsky, 2010). Leaves were harvested 3 days after infiltration with 448
different constructs and analyzed for T6P and lipid contents and for SnRK1 kinase activity and in vivo [1-449
14C] acetate labeling. 450
451
Antibodies and Immunoblotting 452
Anti-WRI1 polyclonal antibodies were described in (Zhai et al., 2017a). Anti-KIN10 (Catalog No. 453
AS10919, Lot No. 1610) and -histone H3 (Catalog No. AS10710’ Lot No. 1411) polyclonal antibodies 454
were purchased from Agrisera, Vännäs, Sweden; www.agrisera.com). Anti-phospho-AMPK alpha-1 455
(Thr172) (Catalog No. PA5-17831, Lot No. TG2607252) was purchased from ThermoFisher. Anti-456
GRIK1 (Catalog No. PHY0844S, Lot No. 4480A5) and GRIK2 (Catalog No. PHY0845S, Lot No. 457
5480A7) were purchased from PhytoAB (Redwood City, CA; www.phytoab.com). All primary 458
antibodies were used at a 1:1000 dilution. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF 459
membrane for immunoblot analysis. Immunoblots of targeted proteins were visualized using HRP-460
conjugated secondary antibodies (Catalog No. AP187P, Millipore) with SuperSignalTM West Femto 461
Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Catalog No. 34095, ThermoFisher). Immunoblot signals were detected 462
and digitalized with Image Quant LAS4000 and quantified with GelAnalyzer2010a. 463
464
Accession Numbers 465
Sequence data from this article can be found in The Arabidopsis Information Resource or UniProtKB 466
under the following accession numbers: KIN10 (At3g01090), GRIK1 (At3g45240), GRIK2 (At5g60550), 467
WRI1 (At3g54320), OtsA (P31677). 468
469
Supplemental Data 470
Supplemental Figure 1. Microspore-derived cell suspension cultures of Brassica napus L. cv. Jet Neuf 471
in liquid culture and plate culture. 472
15
Supplemental Figure 2. Sucrose stabilizes WRI1 and increases fatty acid synthesis in Brassica napus 473
suspension cells, but only if presented at a 1,000-fold higher concentration than T6P. 474
Supplemental Figure 3. Microscale thermophoretic binding tests show a specific association between 475
KIN10 and T6P at a concentration of 50 M. 476
Supplemental Figure 4. Purified recombinant KIN10 and GRIK1 expressed from E. coli. 477
Supplemental Figure 5. Fit of DPM by the amount of purified KIN10 and GRIK1 in a 25-mL reaction. 478
Supplemental Figure 6. The phenotypes of grik mutants. 479
Supplemental Table 1. Oligonucleotide primer sequence pairs. 480
Supplemental File 1. Statistical analysis results for each figure. 481
482
483
Acknowledgements 484
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy 485
Sciences under contract number DE-SC0012704, specifically through the Physical Biosciences program 486
of the Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division. (Z.Z., J.K., H.L., J.S.). T6P analysis 487
was supported by the Max Planck Society (R.F. and J.E.L.). 488
489
Author Contributions: JS, ZZ and JK conceived the study. ZZ, JK, HL, RF and JL performed 490 experiments. ZZ, JK, RF, JL and JS analyzed data. ZZ, JK, JL and JS wrote the manuscript. 491
492
493
16
Table 1. T6P specifically binds KIN10. 494
Ligand
(50 µM)
Target
KIN10 KIN10 (K48A)
ATP + ̶
T6P + +
Sucrose ̶ n.d.
Trehalose ̶ n.d.
Sorbitol ̶ n.d.
Suc-6’-P ̶ n.d.
495
Microscale thermophoresis (MST) was performed to evaluate the interactions between target proteins 496
(KIN10 and KIN10 (K48A)) and potential ligands. +, interaction detected; -, lack of interaction; n.d., not 497
determined. 498
499
Table 2. T6P binding to KIN10 weakens the interaction between GRIK1and KIN10. 500
Target Ligand(s) Kd (µM)
KIN10 ATP 12.8±1.1
KIN10 T6P 32.0±5.6
GRIK1 T6P ―
KIN10 GRIK1 19.5±2.6
KIN10 ATP+T6P (50 µM) 12.9±1.2
KIN10 GRIK1+T6P (50 µM) 67.7±9.8
501
Microscale thermophoresis (MST) was performed to determine the equilibrium dissociation constants 502
(Kd) between KIN10, GRIK1 and T6P. Values represent mean±SD, n=3 independent replicates. Kd 503
values for KIN10 and GRIK1 in the presence of 50 M T6P were significantly different (P<0.002 by 504
Student’s t-test of three independent replicates) from those in the absence of T6P. -, lack of observed 505
interaction between GRIK1 and T6P. 506
507
508
509
510
511
17
REFERENCES 512
513
Ananieva, E.A., Gillaspy, G.E., Ely, A., Burnette, R.N., and Les Erickson, F. (2008). Interaction of the 514 WD40 domain of a myoinositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase with SnRK1 links inositol, sugar, 515 and stress signaling. Plant Physiology 148, 1868-1882. 516
Andre, C., Haslam, R.P., and Shanklin, J. (2012). Feedback regulation of plastidic acetyl-CoA carboxylase 517 by 18: 1-acyl carrier protein in Brassica napus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 518 109, 10107-10112. 519
Baaske, P., Wienken, C., Willemsen, M., Braun, D., and Duhr, S. (2011). Protein-binding assays in 520 biological liquids using microscale thermophoresis. Journal of Biomolecular Techniques: JBT 22, 521 S55. 522
Baena-González, E., Rolland, F., Thevelein, J.M., and Sheen, J. (2007). A central integrator of 523 transcription networks in plant stress and energy signalling. Nature 448, 938-942. 524
Bhalerao, R.P., Salchert, K., Bakó, L., Ökrész, L., Szabados, L., Muranaka, T., Machida, Y., Schell, J., and 525 Koncz, C. (1999). Regulatory interaction of PRL1 WD protein with Arabidopsis SNF1-like protein 526 kinases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96, 5322-5327. 527
Bhattacharyya, M.K., Smith, A.M., Ellis, T.N., Hedley, C., and Martin, C. (1990). The wrinkled-seed 528 character of pea described by Mendel is caused by a transposon-like insertion in a gene 529 encoding starch-branching enzyme. Cell 60, 115-122. 530
Cabib, E., and Leloir, L.F. (1958). The biosynthesis of trehalose phosphate. Journal of Biological 531 Chemistry 231, 259-275. 532
Cernac, A., and Benning, C. (2004). WRINKLED1 encodes an AP2/EREB domain protein involved in the 533 control of storage compound biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 40, 575-585. 534
Crozet, P., Jammes, F., Valot, B., Ambard-Bretteville, F., Nessler, S., Hodges, M., Vidal, J., and Thomas, 535 M. (2010). Cross-phosphorylation between Arabidopsis thaliana sucrose nonfermenting 1-536 related protein kinase 1 (AtSnRK1) and its activating kinase (AtSnAK) determines their catalytic537 activities. Journal of Biological Chemistry 285, 12071-12077.538
Emanuelle, S., Hossain, M.I., Moller, I.E., Pedersen, H.L., Meene, A.M., Doblin, M.S., Koay, A., Oakhill, 539 J.S., Scott, J.W., and Willats, W.G. (2015). SnRK1 from Arabidopsis thaliana is an atypical AMPK.540 The Plant Journal 82, 183-192.541
Estruch, F., Treitel, M.A., Yang, X., and Carlson, M. (1992). N-terminal mutations modulate yeast SNF1 542 protein kinase function. Genetics 132, 639-650. 543
Figueroa, C.M., and Lunn, J.E. (2016). A tale of two sugars: trehalose 6-phosphate and sucrose. Plant 544 Physiology 172, 7-27. 545
Figueroa, C.M., Feil, R., Ishihara, H., Watanabe, M., Kölling, K., Krause, U., Höhne, M., Encke, B., 546 Plaxton, W.C., and Zeeman, S.C. (2016). Trehalose 6–phosphate coordinates organic and amino 547 acid metabolism with carbon availability. The Plant Journal 85, 410-423. 548
Glab, N., Oury, C., Guerinier, T., Domenichini, S., Crozet, P., Thomas, M., Vidal, J., and Hodges, M. 549 (2017). The impact of Arabidopsis thaliana SNF1-related-kinase 1 (SnRK1)-activating kinase 1 550 (SnAK1) and SnAK2 on SnRK1 phosphorylation status: characterization of a SnAK double mutant. 551 The Plant Journal 89, 1031-1041. 552
Griffiths, C.A., Sagar, R., Geng, Y., Primavesi, L.F., Patel, M.K., Passarelli, M.K., Gilmore, I.S., Steven, 553 R.T., Bunch, J., and Paul, M.J. (2016). Chemical intervention in plant sugar signalling increases554 yield and resilience. Nature 540, 574-578.555
Harn, C.H., Bae, J.M., Lee, S.S., Min, S.R., and Liu, J.R. (2000). Presence of multiple cDNAs encoding an 556 isoform of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase large subunit from sweet potato and 557 characterization of expression levels. Plant and Cell Physiology 41, 1235-1242. 558
18
Hawley, S.A., Davison, M., Woods, A., Davies, S.P., Beri, R.K., Carling, D., and Hardie, D.G. (1996). 559 Characterization of the AMP-activated protein kinase kinase from rat liver and identification of 560 threonine 172 as the major site at which it phosphorylates AMP-activated protein kinase. 561 Journal of Biological Chemistry 271, 27879-27887. 562
Kelly, A.A., van Erp, H., Quettier, A.-L., Shaw, E., Menard, G., Kurup, S., and Eastmond, P.J. (2013). The 563 SUGAR-DEPENDENT1 Lipase limits Triacylglycerol accumulation in vegetative tissues of 564 Arabidopsis. Plant physiology 162, 1282-1289. 565
Koo, A.J., Ohlrogge, J.B., and Pollard, M. (2004). On the export of fatty acids from the chloroplast. 566 Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 16101-16110. 567
Li-Beisson, Y., Shorrosh, B., Beisson, F., Andersson, M.X., Arondel, V., Bates, P.D., Baud, S., Bird, D., 568 DeBono, A., and Durrett, T.P. (2013). Acyl-lipid metabolism. The arabidopsis book, e0161. 569
Lin, T.-P., Caspar, T., Somerville, C., and Preiss, J. (1988). Isolation and characterization of a starchless 570 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh lacking ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase activity. Plant 571 Physiology 86, 1131-1135. 572
Lunn, J.E., Feil, R., Hendriks, J.H., Gibon, Y., Morcuende, R., Osuna, D., Scheible, W.-R., Carillo, P., 573 Hajirezaei, M.-R., and Stitt, M. (2006). Sugar-induced increases in trehalose 6-phosphate are 574 correlated with redox activation of ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase and higher rates of starch 575 synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochemical Journal 397, 139-148. 576
Ma, W., Kong, Q., Mantyla, J.J., Yang, Y., Ohlrogge, J.B., and Benning, C. (2016). 14‐3‐3 protein 577 mediates plant seed oil biosynthesis through interaction with AtWRI1. The Plant Journal 88, 228-578 235. 579
Ma, W., Kong, Q., Arondel, V., Kilaru, A., Bates, P.D., Thrower, N.A., Benning, C., and Ohlrogge, J.B. 580 (2013). Wrinkled1, a ubiquitous regulator in oil accumulating tissues from Arabidopsis embryos 581 to oil palm mesocarp. PLoS One 8, e68887. 582
Maeo, K., Tokuda, T., Ayame, A., Mitsui, N., Kawai, T., Tsukagoshi, H., Ishiguro, S., and Nakamura, K. 583
(2009). An AP2‐type transcription factor, WRINKLED1, of Arabidopsis thaliana binds to the 584
AW‐box sequence conserved among proximal upstream regions of genes involved in fatty acid 585 synthesis. The Plant Journal 60, 476-487. 586
Martínez-Barajas, E., Delatte, T., Schluepmann, H., de Jong, G.J., Somsen, G.W., Nunes, C., Primavesi, 587 L.F., Coello, P., Mitchell, R.A., and Paul, M.J. (2011). Wheat grain development is characterized 588 by remarkable trehalose 6-phosphate accumulation pregrain filling: tissue distribution and 589 relationship to SNF1-related protein kinase1 activity. Plant Physiology 156, 373-381. 590
Martins, M.C.M., Hejazi, M., Fettke, J., Steup, M., Feil, R., Krause, U., Arrivault, S., Vosloh, D., 591 Figueroa, C.M., Ivakov, A., Yadav, U.P., Piques, M., Metzner, D., Stitt, M., and Lunn, J.E. (2013). 592 Feedback inhibition of starch degradation in arabidopsis leaves mediated by trehalose 6-593 phosphate. Plant Physiology 163, 1142-1163. 594
Masaki, T., Mitsui, N., Tsukagoshi, H., Nishii, T., Morikami, A., and Nakamura, K. (2005). Activator of 595 Spomin:: LUC1/WRINKLED1 of Arabidopsis thaliana transactivates sugar-inducible promoters. 596 Plant and Cell Physiology 46, 547-556. 597
Nagaraj, V.J., Riedl, R., Boller, T., Wiemken, A., and Meyer, A.D. (2001). Light and sugar regulation of 598 the barley sucrose: fructan 6-fructosyltransferase promoter. Journal of Plant Physiology 158, 599 1601-1607. 600
Nagata, T., Hara, H., Saitou, K., Kobashi, A., Kojima, K., Yuasa, T., and Ueno, O. (2012). Activation of 601 ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase Gene Promoters by a WRKY Transcription Factor, AtWRKY20, in 602 Arabidopsis thaliana L. and Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas Lam.). Plant Production Science 15, 603 10-18. 604
Nakagawa, T., Suzuki, T., Murata, S., Nakamura, S., Hino, T., Maeo, K., Tabata, R., Kawai, T., Tanaka, 605 K., Niwa, Y., Watanabe, Y., Nakamura, K., Kimura, T., and Ishiguro, S. (2007). Improved 606
19
gateway binary vectors: High-performance vectors for creation of fusion constructs in 607 Transgenic analysis of plants. Biosci Biotech Bioch 71, 2095-2100. 608
Nakamura, K., Ohto, M.-a., Yoshida, N., and Nakamura, K. (1991). Sucrose-induced accumulation of β-609 amylase occurs concomitant with the accumulation of starch and sporamin in leaf-petiole 610 cuttings of sweet potato. Plant physiology 96, 902-909. 611
Noël, G., Tognetti, J.A., and Pontis, H.G. (2001). Protein kinase and phosphatase activities are involved 612 in fructan synthesis initiation mediated by sugars. Planta 213, 640-646. 613
Nuccio, M.L., Wu, J., Mowers, R., Zhou, H.P., Meghji, M., Primavesi, L.F., Paul, M.J., Chen, X., Gao, Y., 614 Haque, E., Basu, S.S., and Lagrimini, L.M. (2015). Expression of trehalose-6-phosphate 615 phosphatase in maize ears improves yield in well-watered and drought conditions. Nat 616 Biotechnol 33, 862-869. 617
Nukarinen, E., Nägele, T., Pedrotti, L., Wurzinger, B., Mair, A., Landgraf, R., Börnke, F., Hanson, J., 618 Teige, M., and Baena-Gonzalez, E. (2016). Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals the role of 619 the AMPK plant ortholog SnRK1 as a metabolic master regulator under energy deprivation. 620 Scientific reports 6, 31697. 621
Nunes, C., Primavesi, L.F., Patel, M.K., Martinez-Barajas, E., Powers, S.J., Sagar, R., Fevereiro, P.S., 622 Davis, B.G., and Paul, M.J. (2013). Inhibition of SnRK1 by metabolites: tissue-dependent effects 623 and cooperative inhibition by glucose 1-phosphate in combination with trehalose 6-phosphate. 624 Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 63, 89-98. 625
Ohad, N., and Yalovsky, S. (2010). Utilizing bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) to assay 626 protein–protein interaction in plants. In Plant Developmental Biology (Springer), pp. 347-358. 627
Rodrigues, A., Adamo, M., Crozet, P., Margalha, L., Confraria, A., Martinho, C., Elias, A., Rabissi, A., 628 Lumbreras, V., and González-Guzmán, M. (2013). ABI1 and PP2CA phosphatases are negative 629 regulators of Snf1-related protein kinase1 signaling in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 25, 3871-3884. 630
Sanjaya, Durrett, T.P., Weise, S.E., and Benning, C. (2011). Increasing the energy density of vegetative 631 tissues by diverting carbon from starch to oil biosynthesis in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant 632 Biotechnol J 9, 874-883. 633
Schluepmann, H., Pellny, T., van Dijken, A., Smeekens, S., and Paul, M. (2003). Trehalose 6-phosphate 634 is indispensable for carbohydrate utilization and growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of 635 the National Academy of Sciences 100, 6849-6854. 636
Sheen, J. (2014). Master Regulators in Plant Glucose Signaling Networks. Journal of Plant Biology 57, 67-637 79. 638
Shen, W., and Hanley-Bowdoin, L. (2006). Geminivirus infection up-regulates the expression of two 639 Arabidopsis protein kinases related to yeast SNF1-and mammalian AMPK-activating kinases. 640 Plant Physiology 142, 1642-1655. 641
Shen, W., Reyes, M.I., and Hanley-Bowdoin, L. (2009). Arabidopsis protein kinases GRIK1 and GRIK2 642 specifically activate SnRK1 by phosphorylating its activation loop. Plant Physiology 150, 996-643 1005. 644
Shi, Y., Xu, G., Warrington, T.B., Murdoch, G.K., Kazala, E.C., Snyder, C.L., and Weselake, R.J. (2008). 645 Microspore-derived cell suspension cultures of oilseed rape as a system for studying gene 646 expression. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 92, 131-139. 647
Srivastava, A.C., Ganesan, S., Ismail, I.O., and Ayre, B.G. (2008). Functional characterization of the 648 Arabidopsis AtSUC2 sucrose/H+ symporter by tissue-specific complementation reveals an 649 essential role in phloem loading but not in long-distance transport. Plant physiology 148, 200-650 211. 651
Tiessen, A., Hendriks, J.H., Stitt, M., Branscheid, A., Gibon, Y., Farré, E.M., and Geigenberger, P. (2002). 652 Starch synthesis in potato tubers is regulated by post-translational redox modification of ADP-653
20
glucose pyrophosphorylase a novel regulatory mechanism linking starch synthesis to the sucrose 654 supply. The Plant Cell 14, 2191-2213. 655
Wang, S.-J., Yeh, K.-W., and Tsai, C.-Y. (2001). Regulation of starch granule-bound starch synthase I 656 gene expression by circadian clock and sucrose in the source tissue of sweet potato. Plant 657 Science 161, 635-644. 658
Wienken, C.J., Baaske, P., Rothbauer, U., Braun, D., and Duhr, S. (2010). Protein-binding assays in 659 biological liquids using microscale thermophoresis. Nature communications 1, ncomms1093. 660
Yadav, U.P., Ivakov, A., Feil, R., Duan, G.Y., Walther, D., Giavalisco, P., Piques, M., Carillo, P., 661 Hubberten, H.-M., and Stitt, M. (2014). The sucrose–trehalose 6-phosphate (Tre6P) nexus: 662 specificity and mechanisms of sucrose signalling by Tre6P. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 663 1051-1068. 664
Zhai, Z., Liu, H., and Shanklin, J. (2017a). Phosphorylation of WRINKLED1 by KIN10 results in its 665 proteasomal degradation, providing a link between energy homeostasis and Lipid biosynthesis. 666 The Plant Cell 29, 871-889. 667
Zhai, Z., Liu, H., Xu, C., and Shanklin, J. (2017b). Sugar potentiation of fatty acid and triacylglycerol 668 accumulation. Plant Physiology 175, 696-707. 669
Zhang, Y., Primavesi, L.F., Jhurreea, D., Andralojc, P.J., Mitchell, R.A., Powers, S.J., Schluepmann, H., 670 Delatte, T., Wingler, A., and Paul, M.J. (2009). Inhibition of SNF1-related protein kinase1 activity 671 and regulation of metabolic pathways by trehalose-6-phosphate. Plant Physiology 149, 1860-672 1871. 673
674
675
FIGURE LEGENDS 676
677
Figure 1. The effects of T6P on microspore-derived cell suspension cultures of Brassica napus. (A) T6P 678
contents in B. napus cells cultured on plates supplemented with 100 µM of trehalose 6-phosphate (T6P), 679
sucrose (Suc) or sorbitol (Sor) for 3, 8 hours (h) and 2 days (d). (B) SnRK1 activity in the crude extracts 680
of suspension cells treated for 2 days with sugars as indicated. (C) WRI1 protein levels in (B) are shown 681
by immunoblot with WRI1 specific antibody. Protein loading is shown by histone H3 (H3) from the same 682
sample. A representative immunoblot is shown. The histogram under immunoblots shows relative WRI1 683
protein levels quantified with GelAnalyzer2010 and normalized against corresponding protein levels of 684
histone H3. (D) Total fatty acid at 2-day samples is shown for suspension cells treated with sugars as 685
indicated. In this figure, values represent mean±SD of 3 independent biological replicates. Levels 686
indicated with different letters above histogram bars are significantly different (Student’s t test for all 687
pairs of sugars at the same time point, P<0.05; Supplemental File 1). 688
689
Figure 2. Transient expression of T6P synthase OtsA increases biosynthesis of both TAG and total fatty 690
acid in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. (A) T6P contents in five-week-old N. benthamiana leaves 691
transformed with empty vector (EV) or expressing OtsA for 3 days. Values represent mean±SD of 4 692
independent biological replicates. (B) SnRK1 activity in crude extracts of infiltrated N. benthamiana 693
21
leaves described in (A). TAG (C) and total fatty acids (D) were quantified in the samples described in 694
(A). (E) [1-14C] acetate incorporation into fatty acyl products by strips of N. benthamiana leaves 695
transiently expressing genes as indicated. Values represent mean incorporation ±SD of 5 independent 696
biological replicates after 30 min of labeling. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences from the 697
EV control material (Student’s t test, *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; Supplemental File 1). DPM, disintegrations 698
per minute. 699
700
Figure 3. T6P weakens the interaction between GRIK1 and KIN10. Thermophoretic experiments were 701
performed to determine the equilibrium dissociation constants between KIN10, GRIK1 and T6P (the 702
means of three independent replicates are shown in Table 2). In the thermophoresis experiments, T6P was 703
titrated against KIN10 (A), GRIK1 was titrated against KIN10 in the absence of T6P (B) or in the 704
presence of 50 µM T6P (C). Dissociation curves were fit to the data to calculate the Kd values shown. 705
Data shown are the mean±SD, n=3 independent replicates. 706
707
Figure 4. T6P suppresses KIN10 activation by GRIK1 in vitro. (A) In vitro protein phosphorylation 708
assays were performed using purified recombinant KIN10 and GRIK1. Reactions either contained (+) or 709
did not (-) contain 1 µg of GRIK1, 1 µg of KIN10 or 1 mM of trehalose 6-phosphate (T6P), sucrose (Suc) 710
or sorbitol (Sor), as indicated, in the presence of [γ-32P] ATP. After the reaction, proteins were separated 711
using SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. 32P -labeled proteins were visualized by 712
autoradiography. Inactive KIN10 kinase mutants: KIN10 (T175A) and KIN10 (M48A) were also 713
included as negative controls. A representative autoradiograph is shown. (B) KIN10 activity was 714
determined by measuring the incorporation of 32P from [γ-32P] ATP into the SnRK1-target peptide of 715
sucrose-phosphate synthase (SPS). Kinase activity was quantified for 50 ng of KIN10, or for a mixture of 716
50 ng of KIN10 + 50 ng of GRIK1 or for 50 ng of GRIK1, in the absence (-) or presence of 1 mM T6P or 717
Suc. Values represent mean±SD of 3 independent replicates. Levels indicated with different letters above 718
histogram bars are significantly different (Student’s t test for all pairs of the same proteins, P<0.05; 719
Supplemental File 1). DPM, disintegrations per minute. 720
721
Figure 5. T6P treatment decreases KIN10 phosphorylation in microspore-derived cell suspension cultures 722
of Brassica napus. The levels of phosphorylated KIN10, P-KIN10, KIN10 and GRIK1 were quantified 723
from B. napus cells cultured on plates supplemented with 100 µM of trehalose 6-phosphate (T6P), 724
sucrose (Suc) or sorbitol (Sor) for 1 day (1d) or 2 days (2d) as indicated. A representative immunoblot for 725
each protein is shown. Protein loading is shown by histone H3 from the same sample. 726
727
22
Figure 6. Inhibition of SnRK1 by T6P is GRIK-dependent. SnRK1 activity is quantified by the 728
incorporation of 32P from [γ-32P] ATP into the SPS peptide. Activity was measured in crude extracts from729
12-day-old seedlings of Arabidopsis wild type (WT), grik1 and grik2 single mutants and the grik1grik2730
double mutant in the absence (-) or presence (+) of 100 M T6P. Values represent mean±SD of 3 731
independent biological replicates. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences from the respective 732
control samples lacking T6P for each genotype (Student’s t test, *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; Supplemental File 733
1). 734
735
Figure 7. T6P-regulated plant fatty acid synthesis. High cellular sugar (carbon) is associated with the 736
accumulation of trehalose 6-phosphate (T6P) which binds to KIN10 (small molecule superimposed on 737
KIN10), the catalytic subunit of SnRK1, weakening its affinity for GRIK. This results in decreased 738
phosphorylation of the KIN10 activation loop, thereby reducing the proportion of activated KIN10. 739
Conversely, when the cellular sucrose level is low, levels of T6P decrease and GRIK binds tightly to 740
KIN10, phosphorylating its activation loop and increasing SnRK1 activity. Activated KIN10 741
phosphorylates and inactivates 3-HYDROXY-3-METHYLGLUTARYL COA REDUCTASE 1, 742
NITRATE REDUCTASE, SUCROSE PHOSPHATE SYNTHASE and WRINKLED1 to reduce energy-743
consuming pathways (anabolism) and at the same time, via phosphorylation of other target proteins 744
including several transcription factors, promotes a variety of major catabolic pathways to generate energy. 745
Activated KIN10 can also phosphorylate GRIK and reduce its activity. 746
747
Fig. 1. The effects of T6P on microspore-derived cell suspension cultures of Brassicanapus. (A) T6P contents in B. napus cells cultured on plates supplemented with 100 µMof trehalose 6-phosphate (T6P), sucrose (Suc) or sorbitol (Sor) for 3, 8 hours (h) and 2days (d). (B) SnRK1 activity in the crude extracts of suspension cells treated for 2 dayswith sugars as indicated. (C) WRI1 protein levels in (B) are shown by immunoblot withWRI1 specific antibody. Protein loading is shown by histone H3 (H3) from the samesample. A representative immunoblot is shown. The histogram under immunoblots showsrelative WRI1 protein levels quantified with GelAnalyzer2010 and normalized againstcorresponding protein levels of histone H3. (D) Total fatty acid at 2-day samples is shownfor suspension cells treated with sugars as indicated. In this figure, values representmean±SD of 3 independent biological replicates. Levels indicated with different lettersabove histogram bars are significantly different (Student’s t test for all pairs of sugars atthe same time point, P<0.05).
A
Suc T6P Sor0
5
10
15
20 b
%To
talf
atty
acid
(FW
)
D
T6P
(nm
ole
g-1FW
)
Suc T6P Sor Suc T6P Sor8h 2d
Suc T6P Sor3h
1.5
2.0
2.53.0
1.0
00.5
00.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Suc T6P Sor
B
Rel
ativ
eS
nRK
1ac
tivity
Suc T6P Sor
WRI1
C
H3
MKD
2055
01234
Rel
ativ
epr
otei
nle
vels
ofW
RI1
a a
b
a ab
aa
b
aa b
a a
b
a a
*
0
2.03.04.0
1.0
D
%To
talf
atty
acid
(FW
)
**
0.10.20.30.40.50.6
0
%TA
G(D
W)
C
**
4
8
12
0EV otsA
0
3
4
2
1
T6P
(µm
ole
g-1FW
)
A
*
12345
0
6
DP
M(1
04 )10
0m
gFW
-1
EV otsA
E
*
00.20.50.71.01.2
B
Rel
ativ
eS
nRK
1ac
tivity
Fig. 2. Transient expression of T6P synthase otsAincreases biosynthesis of both TAG and total fatty acidin Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. (A) T6P contents infive-week-old N. benthamiana leaves transformed withempty vector (EV) or expressing otsA for 3 days.Values represent mean±SD of 4 independent biologicalreplicates. (B) SnRK1 activity in crude extracts ofinfiltrated N. benthamiana leaves described in (A). TAG(C) and total fatty (D) were quantified in the samplesdescribed in (A). (E) [1-14C] acetate incorporation intofatty acyl products by strips of N. benthamiana leavestransiently expressing genes as indicated. Valuesrepresent mean incorporation±SD of 5 independentbiological replicates after 30 min of labeling. Asterisksdenote statistically significant differences from the EVcontrol material (Student’s t test, *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01).
EV otsA
EV otsA
EV otsA
EV otsA
852
850
848
846Kd=32.0µM
C
Target=KIN10Ligand=T6P
Kd=19.5µM
Target=KIN10Ligand=GRIK1
Kd=67.7µM
Target=KIN10Ligand=GRIK1Ligand=T6P(50µM)
A
B
844
Fnor
m[0 /
00]
850
845
840
Fnor
m[0 /
00]
832
830
828
826
Fnor
m[0 /
00]
Fig. 3. T6P weakens the interaction between GRIK1 and KIN10. Thermophoreticexperiments to determine the strength of interactions between KIN10, GRIK1 and T6P (themeans of three independent replicates are shown in Table 2). In the thermophoresisexperiments, T6P was titrated against KIN10 (A), GRIK1 was titrated against KIN10 in theabsence of T6P (B) or in the presence of 50 µM T6P (C). Dissociation curves were fitted tothe data for calculation of the Kd values shown. Data shown are the mean±SD, n=3independent repetitions.
Ligand concentration(log[M])
824
-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0
-9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2
-9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2
KIN10 + + + + + – – – –GRIK1 – + + + + + + + +
T6P – – +
pKIN10
pGRIK1
–
KIN10
6
4
1
3
5
2
78
KIN10+GRIK1– T6P Suc – T6P Suc – T6P Suc
Fig. 4. T6P suppresses KIN10 activation by GRIK1 in vitro. (A) In vitro proteinphosphorylation assays were performed using purified recombinant KIN10 and GRIK1.Reactions either contained (+) or did not (–) contain 1 µg of GRIK1, 1 µg of KIN10 or 1mM of trehalose 6-phosphate(T6P), sucrose (Suc) and sorbitol (Sor) as indicated in thepresence of [γ-32P] ATP. After reaction, proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE andtransferred to PVDF membranes. 32P-labeled proteins were visualized by autoradiography.Inactive KIN10 kinase mutants: KIN10 (T175A) and KIN10 (M48A) were also included asnegative controls. A representative autoradiography was shown. (B) KIN10 activity wasdetermined by measuring the incorporation of 32P from [γ-32P] ATP into the SnRK1-targetpeptide of sucrose-phosphate synthase (SPS). Kinase activity was quantified for 50 ng ofKIN10 or for a mixture of 50 ng of KIN10 + 50 ng of GRIK1 or for 50ng of GRIK1, inabsence (–) or presence of 1 mM of T6P or Suc. Values represent mean±SD of 3independent replicates. Levels indicated with different letters above histogram bars aresignificantly different (Student’s t test for all pairs for the same proteins, P<0.05). DPM,disintegrations per minute.
B
A
Phos
phor
ylat
ion
ofSP
Spe
ptid
e(D
PM(1
05 )of
32P)
SucSor
– –+
+
– –– – – – – – –– – – – – – –
++
+T175A
– ––
–
– –M48A
––
GRIK1
ba a
b
aa
aa a
P-KIN10
KIN10
H3
M(KD)
1d 2dSuc T6P Sor Suc T6P Sor
GRIK1
Fig. 5. T6P treatment decreases KIN10 phosphorylation in microspore-derived cellsuspension cultures of Brassica napus. The levels of phosphorylated KIN10, P-KIN10,KIN10 and GRIK1 were quantified from B. napus cells cultured on plates supplementedwith 100 µM of trehalose 6-phosphate (T6P), sucrose (Suc) or sorbitol (Sor) for 1 day (1d)or 2 days (2d) as indicated. A representative immunoblot for each protein is shown.Protein loading is shown by histone H3 from the same sample.
50
50
2015
50
Fig. 6. Inhibition of SnRK1 by T6P is GRIK-dependent. SnRK1 activity isquantified by the incorporation of 32P from [γ-32P] ATP into the SPS peptide.Activity was measured in crude extracts from 12-day old seedlings of Arabidopsiswild type (WT), grik1 and grik2 single mutants and the grik1grik2 double mutant inthe absence (-) or presence (+) of 100 µM T6P. Values represent mean±SD of 3independent biological replicates. Asterisks denote statistically significantdifferences from the respective control samples lacking T6P for each genotype(Student’s t test, *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01).
T6P(100µM)+– +– +– +–
WTgrik1grik2grik1grik2
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
032P
inco
rpor
atio
nin
toS
PS
pept
ide
DP
M(1
04 )m
in-1
µg-1
prot
ein
** ****
*
Fig. 7. T6P-regulated plant fatty acid synthesis.
High cellular sugar (carbon) is associated with the accumulation of trehalose
6-phosphate (T6P) which binds to KIN10 (small molecule superimposed on
KIN10), the catalytic subunit of SnRK1, weakening its affinity for GRIK. This
results in decreased phosphorylation of the KIN10 activation loop, thereby
reducing the proportion of activated KIN10. Conversely, when the cellular
sucrose level is low, levels of T6P decrease and GRIK binds tightly to KIN10,
phosphorylating its activation loop and increasing SnRK1 activity. Activated
KIN10 phosphorylates WRINKLED1 (and other target proteins), resulting its
proteasomal degradation, tuning down fatty acid to reduce carbon (energy)-
consumption. Activated KIN10 can also phosphorylate GRIK and reduce its
activity. E3, ubiquitin-protein ligase. BCCP2, BIOTIN CARBOXYL CARRIER
PROTEIN. KAS1, KETOACYL SYNTHASE. PKP-β1, PLASTIDIAL
PYRUVATE KINASE. AAs, amino acids.
KIN10
GRIK GRIK
KIN10
(Activated)
T
P
T6P
High sugarLow sugar
: Positive: Negative
KIN10 KIN10
WRI1
175T175
T175
T175
P
P
PP
WRI1
P
WRI1
P
E3
Target proteins
AAs
Proteasome
BCCP2,
KAS1,
PKP-β1…
Fatty acid
synthesis
Parsed CitationsAnanieva, E.A., Gillaspy, G.E., Ely, A., Burnette, R.N., and Les Erickson, F. (2008). Interaction of the WD40 domain of a myoinositolpolyphosphate 5-phosphatase with SnRK1 links inositol, sugar, and stress signaling. Plant Physiology 148, 1868-1882.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Andre, C., Haslam, R.P., and Shanklin, J. (2012). Feedback regulation of plastidic acetyl-CoA carboxylase by 18: 1-acyl carrier protein inBrassica napus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 10107-10112.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Baaske, P., Wienken, C., Willemsen, M., Braun, D., and Duhr, S. (2011). Protein-binding assays in biological liquids using microscalethermophoresis. Journal of Biomolecular Techniques: JBT 22, S55.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Baena-González, E., Rolland, F., Thevelein, J.M., and Sheen, J. (2007). A central integrator of transcription networks in plant stress andenergy signalling. Nature 448, 938-942.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bhalerao, R.P., Salchert, K., Bakó, L., Ökrész, L., Szabados, L., Muranaka, T., Machida, Y., Schell, J., and Koncz, C. (1999). Regulatoryinteraction of PRL1 WD protein with Arabidopsis SNF1-like protein kinases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96, 5322-5327.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bhattacharyya, M.K., Smith, A.M., Ellis, T.N., Hedley, C., and Martin, C. (1990). The wrinkled-seed character of pea described by Mendelis caused by a transposon-like insertion in a gene encoding starch-branching enzyme. Cell 60, 115-122.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cabib, E., and Leloir, L.F. (1958). The biosynthesis of trehalose phosphate. Journal of Biological Chemistry 231, 259-275.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cernac, A., and Benning, C. (2004). WRINKLED1 encodes an AP2/EREB domain protein involved in the control of storage compoundbiosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 40, 575-585.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Crozet, P., Jammes, F., Valot, B., Ambard-Bretteville, F., Nessler, S., Hodges, M., Vidal, J., and Thomas, M. (2010). Cross-phosphorylation between Arabidopsis thaliana sucrose nonfermenting 1-related protein kinase 1 (AtSnRK1) and its activating kinase(AtSnAK) determines their catalytic activities. Journal of Biological Chemistry 285, 12071-12077.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Emanuelle, S., Hossain, M.I., Moller, I.E., Pedersen, H.L., Meene, A.M., Doblin, M.S., Koay, A., Oakhill, J.S., Scott, J.W., and Willats, W.G.(2015). SnRK1 from Arabidopsis thaliana is an atypical AMPK. The Plant Journal 82, 183-192.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Estruch, F., Treitel, M.A., Yang, X., and Carlson, M. (1992). N-terminal mutations modulate yeast SNF1 protein kinase function. Genetics132, 639-650.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Figueroa, C.M., and Lunn, J.E. (2016). A tale of two sugars: trehalose 6-phosphate and sucrose. Plant Physiology 172, 7-27.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Figueroa, C.M., Feil, R., Ishihara, H., Watanabe, M., Kölling, K., Krause, U., Höhne, M., Encke, B., Plaxton, W.C., and Zeeman, S.C. (2016).Trehalose 6–phosphate coordinates organic and amino acid metabolism with carbon availability. The Plant Journal 85, 410-423.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Glab, N., Oury, C., Guerinier, T., Domenichini, S., Crozet, P., Thomas, M., Vidal, J., and Hodges, M. (2017). The impact of Arabidopsisthaliana SNF1-related-kinase 1 (SnRK1)-activating kinase 1 (SnAK1) and SnAK2 on SnRK1 phosphorylation status: characterization of aSnAK double mutant. The Plant Journal 89, 1031-1041.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Griffiths, C.A., Sagar, R., Geng, Y., Primavesi, L.F., Patel, M.K., Passarelli, M.K., Gilmore, I.S., Steven, R.T., Bunch, J., and Paul, M.J.
(2016). Chemical intervention in plant sugar signalling increases yield and resilience. Nature 540, 574-578.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Harn, C.H., Bae, J.M., Lee, S.S., Min, S.R., and Liu, J.R. (2000). Presence of multiple cDNAs encoding an isoform of ADP-glucosepyrophosphorylase large subunit from sweet potato and characterization of expression levels. Plant and Cell Physiology 41, 1235-1242.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hawley, S.A., Davison, M., Woods, A., Davies, S.P., Beri, R.K., Carling, D., and Hardie, D.G. (1996). Characterization of the AMP-activated protein kinase kinase from rat liver and identification of threonine 172 as the major site at which it phosphorylates AMP-activated protein kinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271, 27879-27887.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kelly, A.A., van Erp, H., Quettier, A.-L., Shaw, E., Menard, G., Kurup, S., and Eastmond, P.J. (2013). The SUGAR-DEPENDENT1 Lipaselimits Triacylglycerol accumulation in vegetative tissues of Arabidopsis. Plant physiology 162, 1282-1289.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Koo, A.J., Ohlrogge, J.B., and Pollard, M. (2004). On the export of fatty acids from the chloroplast. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279,16101-16110.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li-Beisson, Y., Shorrosh, B., Beisson, F., Andersson, M.X., Arondel, V., Bates, P.D., Baud, S., Bird, D., DeBono, A., and Durrett, T.P.(2013). Acyl-lipid metabolism. The arabidopsis book, e0161.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lin, T.-P., Caspar, T., Somerville, C., and Preiss, J. (1988). Isolation and characterization of a starchless mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana(L.) Heynh lacking ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase activity. Plant Physiology 86, 1131-1135.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lunn, J.E., Feil, R., Hendriks, J.H., Gibon, Y., Morcuende, R., Osuna, D., Scheible, W.-R., Carillo, P., Hajirezaei, M.-R., and Stitt, M.(2006). Sugar-induced increases in trehalose 6-phosphate are correlated with redox activation of ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase andhigher rates of starch synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochemical Journal 397, 139-148.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ma, W., Kong, Q., Mantyla, J.J., Yang, Y., Ohlrogge, J.B., and Benning, C. (2016). 14‐3‐3 protein mediates plant seed oil biosynthesisthrough interaction with AtWRI1. The Plant Journal 88, 228-235.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ma, W., Kong, Q., Arondel, V., Kilaru, A., Bates, P.D., Thrower, N.A., Benning, C., and Ohlrogge, J.B. (2013). Wrinkled1, a ubiquitousregulator in oil accumulating tissues from Arabidopsis embryos to oil palm mesocarp. PLoS One 8, e68887.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Maeo, K., Tokuda, T., Ayame, A., Mitsui, N., Kawai, T., Tsukagoshi, H., Ishiguro, S., and Nakamura, K. (2009). An AP2‐type transcriptionfactor, WRINKLED1, of Arabidopsis thaliana binds to the AW‐box sequence conserved among proximal upstream regions of genesinvolved in fatty acid synthesis. The Plant Journal 60, 476-487.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Martínez-Barajas, E., Delatte, T., Schluepmann, H., de Jong, G.J., Somsen, G.W., Nunes, C., Primavesi, L.F., Coello, P., Mitchell, R.A.,and Paul, M.J. (2011). Wheat grain development is characterized by remarkable trehalose 6-phosphate accumulation pregrain filling:tissue distribution and relationship to SNF1-related protein kinase1 activity. Plant Physiology 156, 373-381.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Martins, M.C.M., Hejazi, M., Fettke, J., Steup, M., Feil, R., Krause, U., Arrivault, S., Vosloh, D., Figueroa, C.M., Ivakov, A., Yadav, U.P.,Piques, M., Metzner, D., Stitt, M., and Lunn, J.E. (2013). Feedback inhibition of starch degradation in arabidopsis leaves mediated bytrehalose 6-phosphate. Plant Physiology 163, 1142-1163.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Masaki, T., Mitsui, N., Tsukagoshi, H., Nishii, T., Morikami, A., and Nakamura, K. (2005). Activator of Spomin:: LUC1/WRINKLED1 ofArabidopsis thaliana transactivates sugar-inducible promoters. Plant and Cell Physiology 46, 547-556.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nagaraj, V.J., Riedl, R., Boller, T., Wiemken, A., and Meyer, A.D. (2001). Light and sugar regulation of the barley sucrose: fructan 6-fructosyltransferase promoter. Journal of Plant Physiology 158, 1601-1607.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nagata, T., Hara, H., Saitou, K., Kobashi, A., Kojima, K., Yuasa, T., and Ueno, O. (2012). Activation of ADP-Glucose PyrophosphorylaseGene Promoters by a WRKY Transcription Factor, AtWRKY20, in Arabidopsis thaliana L. and Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas Lam.).Plant Production Science 15, 10-18.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nakagawa, T., Suzuki, T., Murata, S., Nakamura, S., Hino, T., Maeo, K., Tabata, R., Kawai, T., Tanaka, K., Niwa, Y., Watanabe, Y.,Nakamura, K., Kimura, T., and Ishiguro, S. (2007). Improved gateway binary vectors: High-performance vectors for creation of fusionconstructs in Transgenic analysis of plants. Biosci Biotech Bioch 71, 2095-2100.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nakamura, K., Ohto, M.-a., Yoshida, N., and Nakamura, K. (1991). Sucrose-induced accumulation of β-amylase occurs concomitant withthe accumulation of starch and sporamin in leaf-petiole cuttings of sweet potato. Plant physiology 96, 902-909.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Noël, G., Tognetti, J.A., and Pontis, H.G. (2001). Protein kinase and phosphatase activities are involved in fructan synthesis initiationmediated by sugars. Planta 213, 640-646.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nuccio, M.L., Wu, J., Mowers, R., Zhou, H.P., Meghji, M., Primavesi, L.F., Paul, M.J., Chen, X., Gao, Y., Haque, E., Basu, S.S., andLagrimini, L.M. (2015). Expression of trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase in maize ears improves yield in well-watered and droughtconditions. Nat Biotechnol 33, 862-869.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nukarinen, E., Nägele, T., Pedrotti, L., Wurzinger, B., Mair, A., Landgraf, R., Börnke, F., Hanson, J., Teige, M., and Baena-Gonzalez, E.(2016). Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals the role of the AMPK plant ortholog SnRK1 as a metabolic master regulator underenergy deprivation. Scientific reports 6, 31697.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nunes, C., Primavesi, L.F., Patel, M.K., Martinez-Barajas, E., Powers, S.J., Sagar, R., Fevereiro, P.S., Davis, B.G., and Paul, M.J. (2013).Inhibition of SnRK1 by metabolites: tissue-dependent effects and cooperative inhibition by glucose 1-phosphate in combination withtrehalose 6-phosphate. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 63, 89-98.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ohad, N., and Yalovsky, S. (2010). Utilizing bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) to assay protein–protein interaction inplants. In Plant Developmental Biology (Springer), pp. 347-358.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Rodrigues, A., Adamo, M., Crozet, P., Margalha, L., Confraria, A., Martinho, C., Elias, A., Rabissi, A., Lumbreras, V., and González-Guzmán, M. (2013). ABI1 and PP2CA phosphatases are negative regulators of Snf1-related protein kinase1 signaling in Arabidopsis.The Plant Cell 25, 3871-3884.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sanjaya, Durrett, T.P., Weise, S.E., and Benning, C. (2011). Increasing the energy density of vegetative tissues by diverting carbonfrom starch to oil biosynthesis in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol J 9, 874-883.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Schluepmann, H., Pellny, T., van Dijken, A., Smeekens, S., and Paul, M. (2003). Trehalose 6-phosphate is indispensable forcarbohydrate utilization and growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 6849-6854.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sheen, J. (2014). Master Regulators in Plant Glucose Signaling Networks. Journal of Plant Biology 57, 67-79.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shen, W., and Hanley-Bowdoin, L. (2006). Geminivirus infection up-regulates the expression of two Arabidopsis protein kinases relatedto yeast SNF1-and mammalian AMPK-activating kinases. Plant Physiology 142, 1642-1655.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shen, W., Reyes, M.I., and Hanley-Bowdoin, L. (2009). Arabidopsis protein kinases GRIK1 and GRIK2 specifically activate SnRK1 byphosphorylating its activation loop. Plant Physiology 150, 996-1005.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shi, Y., Xu, G., Warrington, T.B., Murdoch, G.K., Kazala, E.C., Snyder, C.L., and Weselake, R.J. (2008). Microspore-derived cellsuspension cultures of oilseed rape as a system for studying gene expression. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 92, 131-139.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Srivastava, A.C., Ganesan, S., Ismail, I.O., and Ayre, B.G. (2008). Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis AtSUC2 sucrose/H+symporter by tissue-specific complementation reveals an essential role in phloem loading but not in long-distance transport. Plantphysiology 148, 200-211.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tiessen, A., Hendriks, J.H., Stitt, M., Branscheid, A., Gibon, Y., Farré, E.M., and Geigenberger, P. (2002). Starch synthesis in potatotubers is regulated by post-translational redox modification of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase a novel regulatory mechanism linkingstarch synthesis to the sucrose supply. The Plant Cell 14, 2191-2213.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang, S.-J., Yeh, K.-W., and Tsai, C.-Y. (2001). Regulation of starch granule-bound starch synthase I gene expression by circadianclock and sucrose in the source tissue of sweet potato. Plant Science 161, 635-644.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wienken, C.J., Baaske, P., Rothbauer, U., Braun, D., and Duhr, S. (2010). Protein-binding assays in biological liquids using microscalethermophoresis. Nature communications 1, ncomms1093.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yadav, U.P., Ivakov, A., Feil, R., Duan, G.Y., Walther, D., Giavalisco, P., Piques, M., Carillo, P., Hubberten, H.-M., and Stitt, M. (2014). Thesucrose–trehalose 6-phosphate (Tre6P) nexus: specificity and mechanisms of sucrose signalling by Tre6P. Journal of ExperimentalBotany 65, 1051-1068.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhai, Z., Liu, H., and Shanklin, J. (2017a). Phosphorylation of WRINKLED1 by KIN10 results in its proteasomal degradation, providing alink between energy homeostasis and Lipid biosynthesis. The Plant Cell 29, 871-889.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhai, Z., Liu, H., Xu, C., and Shanklin, J. (2017b). Sugar potentiation of fatty acid and triacylglycerol accumulation. Plant Physiology 175,696-707.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang, Y., Primavesi, L.F., Jhurreea, D., Andralojc, P.J., Mitchell, R.A., Powers, S.J., Schluepmann, H., Delatte, T., Wingler, A., and Paul,M.J. (2009). Inhibition of SNF1-related protein kinase1 activity and regulation of metabolic pathways by trehalose-6-phosphate. PlantPhysiology 149, 1860-1871.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DOI 10.1105/tpc.18.00521; originally published online September 24, 2018;Plant Cell
Zhiyang Zhai, Jantana Keereetaweep, Hui Liu, Regina Feil, John E. Lunn and John ShanklinTrehalose 6-phosphate positively regulates fatty acid biosynthesis by stabilizing WRINKLED1
This information is current as of April 10, 2021
Supplemental Data /content/suppl/2018/09/24/tpc.18.00521.DC1.html
Permissions https://www.copyright.com/ccc/openurl.do?sid=pd_hw1532298X&issn=1532298X&WT.mc_id=pd_hw1532298X
eTOCs http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
Sign up for eTOCs at:
CiteTrack Alerts http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
Sign up for CiteTrack Alerts at:
Subscription Information http://www.aspb.org/publications/subscriptions.cfm
is available at:Plant Physiology and The Plant CellSubscription Information for
ADVANCING THE SCIENCE OF PLANT BIOLOGY © American Society of Plant Biologists