trent oatman portfolio

The architecture portfolio of Trent Wilson Oatman from the Graduate School of Architecture Planning and Preservation at Columbia University

Trent Wilson Oatman

Ojective Seeking entry level architect position.

Education Columbia University, New York, NY M Arch May 2013 Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX BS Architecture Dec 2009 Sigma Alpha Epsilon

Experience Salles Schaffer Architecture, New York, NY Summer 2012 Intern Designed interior and exterior elements of firms first stand alone residence in Guilford, Conn. Drafted plans for the combination of two apartments in Soho. Contributed to construction documents for Upper West Side renovation.

Hollwich Kushner, New York, NY Summer 2012

Assembled Wendy, the winning competition entry for MoMA PS1, from construction documents detailed by the design team at HWKN. Columbia Universirty, New York, NY Summer 2011 Fabricator Participated as a member of the Building Renovations Crew. Constructed new MSRED lecture room based on construction documents from SHoP Architects.

Eisenman Architects, New York, NY Summer 2010 Intern Aided design team on competition entry for Holocaust museum in Italy. Worked on schematic design for renovation and expansion of Rutgers Athletic Center.

Eisenman Architects, New York, NY Summer 2009 Intern Assisted design of new university building, in Spain, and surrounding rural site by adapting current plans to expand vision of objective. Built physical models to show updated representations to visiting clients. Constructed site model for Pompei train station to be displayed in local setting. Robert Kelly Architect, Fort Worth, TX Summer 2007 Intern Proposed adaptive reuse plans for neglected buildings in urban center. Corrected red lines on construction documents of family residence.

Educational Travel

Fall 2012

Graduate Studio V, Dubai, UAE and Amman, Jordan Undergraduate Studio V, Seville, Spain and Leuven, Belgium Summer 2008 Skills Rhinoceros Photoshop CS6 Illustrator CS6 AutoCAD Vray 3D Printing CNC Milling Grasshopper Laser Cutting Model Making InDesign CS6

Photography

[email protected]

Spring 2012Graduate Studio VI , Istanbul, Turkey and London, England

Volunteer

Contents

Core Studio One, Christoph Kumpusch Fall 2010Airlab. New York, USA

Advanced Studio Six, Jeffery Inaba Spring 2013

Micro Neighborhood. Brooklyn, USA

Core Studio Three, Charles Eldred Fall 2011Housing. New York, USA

Advanced Studio Four, Kazys Varnelis Spring 2012Terminal. New York, USA

Architectural Technology 4 , Chris Andreacola Fall 2011Inventure Hall of Fame. Akron, USA

Salles Schaffer Architecture, Julie Schaffer Summer 2012Residential. New York, USA

Hollwich Kushner, Adam Hostetler Summer 2012Wendy. Queens, USA

Eisenman Architects, Peter Eisenman Summer 2010Varied. New York, USA

Architectural Photography 5, Sandra McKee & Jason Stone Spring 2012Box Office. The Bronx, USA

Studio VI: Neighborhood

The final studio in the Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation examined the architecture of the neighbor-hood. My site became the area between the Manhattan and Williamsburg bridges, which today largely consists of the Brooklyn Navy Yard. The first move on an urban scale was to extend the Brooklyn Bridge Park northward and slightly inland. This move creates the possibility for a neighborhood to be

organized around green space. The site for my building becomes one of the lots bor-dered on one side by the East River and on the other by the park.

At the building scale an interest developed in creating a new typology that could be catego-rized by the vast, vacant footprint left from the demolition of navy yard in combination with the dense fabric that covers the rest

of the city. What emerged was a pair of buildings that orient views equally inland to the new neigborhood and outward to the river and bridges. Shared residential courtyards, punched out of the roof plane, create a bal-ance between urban and rural living and also challenge the trend that the top floor is the most desired place to live in a building.

Studio led by Jeffrey Inaba.

Contents

Advanced Studio Six, Jeffery Inaba Spring 2013 Micro Neighborhood. Brooklyn, USA

Advanced Studio Five, Mario Gooden Fall 2012 Kunsthalle. Amman, Jordan




Core Studio Two, Karel Klein Spring 2011Library. New York, USA

Architectural Technology, Chris Andreacola Fall 2011Inventure Hall of Fame. Akron, USA

Architectural Photography, Erieta Attali Spring 2011Juxtaposition. New York, USA




Above: Master plan bound by the Manhattan Bridge, East River, Williamsburg Bridge and the Brooklyn Queens Expressway.

The objective for the housing units was to find an equilibrium between penthouse and ground floor units. Creating equality among units when viewed from the outside.

Contents












Above Left: Model elevation photographs.Above Left Center:The creation of a new typology. Showing how one unit can simultaneously have a hi-rise and ground level condition. Above:View from the neighborhood towards the waterfront.

UP

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

GROUND FLOOR PLAN1/16 IN = 1 FT

UPUP

UPUP

RRRR

BARRESTAURANT BAR RESTAURANT

RESTAURANT RESTAURANTBAR BAR

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

UP

UP UP

UPUP

FARMERS MARKET

FARMERS MARKET

UP

UP

Above: Ground floor plan laid out across a 25’ x 25’ grid which is further subdivided in the center to a 12’6” x 12’6” grid.

UP


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

GROUND FLOOR PLAN1/16 IN = 1 FT

UPUP

UPUP

RRRR

BARRESTAURANT BAR RESTAURANT

RESTAURANT RESTAURANTBAR BAR

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

UP

UP UP

UPUP

FARMERS MARKET

FARMERS MARKET

UP

UP

Contents













1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

SEVENTH FLOOR PLAN1/16 IN = 1 FTAbove:

Seventh floor plan showing the relationship of the roof plane to the units as well as the courtyards to the interior spaces.


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

SEVENTH FLOOR PLAN1/16 IN = 1 FT

Contents












Above: Looking East at the two mixed use buildings, juxtaposing the slope of the short side with the more gradual slope of the long side.

Contents












Above: A resident stands on the lawn of his courtyard viewing the scene below.

Studio IV: Terminal

The Port Authority Bus Terminal has been op-erating past capacity for more than a dacade and has been due an aesthetic overhaul for even longer. The project aims to provide greater connectivity to the midown region by creating an underground bus loop composed of six small scale stations from the mouth of the Lincoln Tunnel to 5th avenue and back again. Moving the buses and stations under-ground will erase the largest, most over-

bearing floor plate in all of New York City in New York as well as provide commuters with greater connectivity to the subway lines and office buildings of central Manhattan. Spreading the footprint across the island is also an opportunity to rid the superflous program in the current station as the street scape above the proposed terminal incorpo-rates all the necessities of a commuter.

Studio led by Kazys Varnelis.

PORT AUTHORITY

TIMES SQUARE

GRAND CENTRAL

Disconnectivity Between Transit

Better Connected Future

The Initial proposal is to move Port Author-ity Bus Terminal to the beneath the streets surrounding Bryant Park, in an attempt to establish a greater connection between the 42nd street transportation networks.

Contents












W 37th St W 36th St

W 35th St

W 34th St

W 33rd St W 32nd St

W 48th St W 47th St

W 46th St

W 45th St W 44th St

W 37th St W 36th St

W 35th St

W 34th St

W 33th St

W 32nd St

W 29th St

E 40th St

E 39th St

E 37th St

E 36th St

E 35th St

E 48th St

E 47th St

E 46th St

E 45th St

5th

Av

5th

Av

Mad

ison

Av

Mad

ison

Av

Park

Av M

adiso

n Av

Lexi

ngto

n Av

3rd

Av

9th

Av

2nd

Av

E 51st St

E 50th St

E 49th St

W 51st St

W 50th St

W 49th St

W 52nd St

W 48th St W 47th St

W 46th St

W 45th St

W 39th St W 38th St

W 37th St

W 36th St

W 35th St

W 34th St

W 33th St

W 44th St

W 43rd St

W 42nd St

W 32nd St

9th

Av

10th

Av

W 40th St

W 39th St

W 44th St W 43rd St

W 43rd St

W 38th St

W 39th St

W 38th St

W 40th St

W 42nd St

W 40th St

5th

Av

2016 Subway Map

W 37th St W 36th St

W 35th St

W 34th St

W 33rd St W 32nd St

W 48th St W 47th St

W 46th St

W 45th St W 44th St

W 37th St W 36th St

W 35th St

W 34th St

W 33th St

W 32nd St

W 29th St

E 40th St

E 39th St

E 37th St

E 36th St

E 35th St

E 48th St

E 47th St

E 46th St

E 45th St

5th

Av

5th

Av

Mad

ison

Av

Mad

ison

Av

Park

Av M

adiso

n Av

Lexi

ngto

n Av

3rd

Av

9th

Av

2nd

Av

E 51st St

E 50th St

E 49th St

W 51st St

W 50th St

W 49th St

W 52nd St

W 48th St W 47th St

W 46th St

W 45th St

W 39th St W 38th St

W 37th St

W 36th St

W 35th St

W 34th St

W 33th St

W 44th St

W 43rd St

W 42nd St

W 32nd St

9th

Av

10th

Av

W 40th St

W 39th St

W 44th St W 43rd St

W 43rd St

W 38th St

W 39th St

W 38th St

W 40th St

W 42nd St

W 40th St

5th

Av

Times Sq-GCT Transfer

W 37th St W 36th St

W 35th St

W 34th St

W 33rd St W 32nd St

W 48th St W 47th St

W 46th St

W 45th St W 44th St

W 37th St W 36th St

W 35th St

W 34th St

W 33th St

W 32nd St

W 29th St

E 40th St

E 39th St

E 37th St

E 36th St

E 35th St

E 48th St

E 47th St

E 46th St

E 45th St

5th

Av

5th

Av

Mad

ison

Av

Mad

ison

Av

Park

Av

Park

Av M

adiso

n Av

Lexi

ngto

n Av

3rd

Av

6th

Av

7th

Av

7th

Av

9th

Av

2nd

Av

E 51st St

E 50th St

E 49th St

W 51st St

W 50th St

W 49th St

W 52nd St

W 48th St W 47th St

W 46th St

W 45th St

W 39th St W 38th St

W 37th St

W 36th St

W 35th St

W 34th St

W 33th St

W 44th St

W 43rd St

W 42nd St

W 32nd St

9th

Av

10th

Av

W 40th St

W 39th St

W 41st St

W 43rd St

W 43rd St

W 44th St

7th

Av

W 38th St 8th

Av

W 39th St

Subgrade Bus RoadwayTo Midtown Tunnel

To Lincoln Tunnel

W 36th St W 35th St

W 34th St

W 33rd St W 32nd St

W 48th St W 47th St

W 46th St

W 37th St W 36th St

W 35th St

W 34th St

W 33th St

W 32nd St

W 29th St

E 40th St

E 39th St

E 37th St

E 36th St

E 35th St

E 48th St

E 47th St

E 46th St

E 45th St

5th

Av

5th

Av

Mad

ison

Av

Mad

ison

Av

Park

Av M

adiso

n Av

Lexi

ngto

n Av

3rd

Av

9th

Av

2nd

Av

E 51st St

E 50th St

E 49th St

W 51st St

W 50th St

W 49th St

W 52nd St

W 48th St W 47th St

W 46th St

W 45th St

W 39th St W 38th St

W 37th St

W 36th St

W 35th St

W 34th St

W 33th St

W 44th St

W 43rd St

W 42nd St

W 32nd St

9th

Av

10th

Av

W 40th St

W 39th St

W 44th St

W 43rd St

7th

Av

7th

Av

7th

Av

Park

Av

6th

Av

Connections to Subway

Connection to ACE

Connection to 123 NQR 7

Connection to BDFM 7

Connection to BDFM NQR

Connection to ACE

2016 Midtown Subway Map.

Opening of existing and proposed tunnel network. Allows under-ground access from Grand Central to Penn Station.

Subgrade Bus Roadway consisting of two one-way loops to New Jersey and Queens.

Underground project extents with connections to 13 subway lines.

Expansion of subway network: Connectivity between bus and subway:

Above: Below ground proposalRight: Street level proposal

5th Avenue Departure EntranceBroadway Departure Entrance

5th Avenue Arrival EntranceBroadway Arrival Entrance

37th St

43rd St

37th S

t

7th Av


Kunsthalle. Amman, Jordan

37th St

43rd St

37th S

t

7th Av

New Y ork Public Library

HBO Headquarters

Conde Nast Bank of America

Lord and Taylor

Met Life

Residence Inn

SUNY

Grace Building 500 5th AveChipotle

Rockefeller Foundation

425 5th Ave

HSBC

Bryant Park Corp

Chase Bank

1010 6th Ave

Buildings linked to bus stations via underground connection

Site plan showing expanded Bryant Park and 4 of 6 station entrances

Roadway

Pedestrian Platform

Pedestrian Bridge

Lightwell

Entrance

Bus Parking Spot

7th Avenue

Pedestrian Walkway

Grass Lawn

Access Level

Autonomous Bus

Escalator

Above: Section through Broadway departure stationRight: Access (passenger) level view of station

Contents












Studio III: Housing

The fall semester of second year is devoted to the issue of housing in New York. The site is located on the south side of 125th street between 3rd Avenue and Lexington and called for 400 units ranging in size from one to four bedrooms. The approach to the design was to start at the human scale and work up to the scale of the city. A highly cali-brated bathroom is the nucleus to each unit, which is then surrounded by a simple matrix

of adjacent rooms eliminating all corridors. Four units make a quad and each quad shares a double height outdoor space; in-creasing the relative square footage of each apartment. The base of the housing towers is an extension of the much used sidewalk. It contains a basketball court, swimming pool, preformance space and library. All visible from the street.

Project designed in partnership with Anton Yupangco. Studio led by Charles Eldred.

127th Street Friction

79th Street Efficiency

Above: A major contributor towards the design concept was the difference of street life in Harlem compared with the rest of Manhattan.

Contents












12

2 Bedroom UnitOrganized around highly calibrated bathroom.

4 Unit Quad Organized around shared utility.

2 Quad’sOrganized around extended living room deck.

Duplex Quad’sOrganized around double height extended living room deck.

Floors 1-7Organized around exterior void

Complete BuildingWith roof deck

Contents












Above: 4 unit quad plan

Above right: Unit aggregation strategy

Above: Ground floor strategy (from left to right: performance space, swimming pool, library, basketball court.

Above Right: North Elevation

Right: Section showing the relationship between the sidewalk and sunken court.

Contents












Studio I: Airlab

Core I studio at Columbia University is focused on atmosphere and architectures possibility to alter it. The project, entitled The AirLab, is a work environment for climatolo-gists and houses a theater for the public. The building is located at the intersection of Peck Slip and Front street, located just south of the Brooklyn Bridge. In order to takeadvantage of the views of the surrounding city, which is limited at ground level due to

the above grade FDR highway, my proposal is to construct a building with a minimal footprint that grows dramatically in size as the building rises. With a relatively free site remaining underneath the building and the areas rich history I plan to excavate the site and display the findings in a permanent ex-hibit beneath the building.

Studio led by Christoph Kumpusch.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Massing Strategy[1] Extrude floorplate to maximum allowable height.[2] Reduce volume to appropriate square footage while taking advantage of view.[3] Reconnect with ground for entrance and introduce courtyard for light.[4] Begin dividing facade surfaces to achieve more balanced shape.

[5] Repeat step [4] until satisfied[6] Expand courtyard to interrupt facade.New facade sacle is more appropriate fit among neighborhood buildings.[7] Add walkways and Parapet.

Contents












first floor plan

E

E

ENTRANCE

third floor plan

EQUIPMENT

KITCHEN

RR

RR

THEATER

OPEN TO BELOW

OPEN TO BELOW

REST

REST

REST

REST

REST

RESTE

E

UP

DN

UP

E.GALLERY

W. GALLERY

UP

UP

DN

RR

RR

E

E

DECK

MEETING

LAB

GYM

UP

AIRLOCK

AIRLOCK

E.GALLERY

W. GALLERY

DN

fifth floor plan

Above: plans at level 1, level 3, and level 5eadvantage of the views of the surroundingRight: sections facing northeast and northwest

GYM

MEETING RR

RR

RR

ENTRANCE

RECEPTION

LAB

LAB MEETING

DECK

RR

1

2

3

4

5

6

-1

-2

A

A

THEATERKITCHEN EQUIPMENT

GARAGE

GENERATORSHOP

10’ 20’0’

0’

15’

30’

45’

60’

75’

-12.5’

-25’

longitudinal section

-42.5’

-120’

1

2

3

4

5

6

-1

-2

B

B

0’

15’

30’

45’

60’

75’

-12.5’

-25’

latitudinal section

Contents












Tech IV

Our team was assigned the National Inventors Hall of Fame by Polshek Part-nership which was build in Akron, Ohio in 1995. Provided with the original con-struction documents we were challenged to reproduce the entire building from overall structure, to architectural details, and mechanical systems. In partnership with Rebecca Marriott, Elizabeth Robert-son, Tanya Gershon and Ray Ho.

Course led by Chris Andreacola.

AIR HANDLING UNITS COOLING TOWER / CHILLED WATER LINEScooling towers / chilled water linesair handling units

HEATING, VENTILATION, AND COOLING SYSTEMS

SUPPLY AIR RETURN AIR

supply air return air

heating, ventilation, and cooling systems

Contents












1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

2.

3.

1.

4.

1.

2.3.4.

1.2.

3.4.

5.

6.

Detail A1. concrete structural column2. bird screen3. louver system4. glazing system5. strong-back

Detail B1. formed aluminum coping2. 4”x6” galv. stl. angle3. aluminum louver frame4. louvers5. birdscreen6. concrete

Detail C1. concrete structural column2. insulation3. typ. interior wall material4. metal panel5. glazing system6. strong - back

Detail D1. metal panel and cap2. gravel3. insulation4. flashing5. concrete

5.

Detail D

5.

6.

Detail C

Detail B

Detail Abelow:corner of building with details highlightedopposite:detail of curtain wall and roof connection

x bracing

8” diameter structural streel tube

steel tube and channel

foam supported flexible flashing

intermediary purlins

curved steel w12 x 170 i-beams

sound batt with wire mesh backing

pinned connections

steel connection plates

skylight glazing system

x bracing

8” diameter structural streel tube

steel tube and channel

foam supported flexible flashing

intermediary purlins

curved steel w12 x 170 i-beams

2 x 4 aluminum tube

aluminum bracketinsulated metal panels

Contents












Tech V

Our speculative loft building creates inter-linked commercial spaces for design studios and artisan workshops. Sectionally and horizontally enmeshed loft spaces meet at distinct 25’ x 25’ cubes. These cubes exist at each intersection in order to encourage collaboration among diverse disciplines. To express our architectural intent we chose to construct the building out of cast-in-place concrete. A 25’ x 25’ column grid is used

throughout. The two cores are offset 100’ apart, with a double loaded corridor be-tween, in order to maximize natural light in the offices. Individual single story staircases create private access between floors to each of the double height collaborative spaces. The facade is primarily clad with 10’ wide pre-fabricated ductile panels. The six panel types are 25-45% glazed. The north facade priviledges panel types with more glazing to

maximize daylight while the southern facade uses more opaque types to minimize solar gain. The collaborative cubes are expressed on the exterior by transparent glass pro-scribed by cor-ten steel and extend 4.5’ outward from the slab edge.

Course led by Sandra McKee and Jason Stone.

Contents












Other Design, Michael Rock Spring 2013Diagrams. N/A

N

Site Plan

450’

70’

30’

450’

280’ 30’

SITE PLANSCALE: 1”=32’-0”

0’

18’

32’

46’

60’

74‘

88‘

102’

116’

2.5’

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A2

A2

A1

A1

25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’

SOUTH ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/8” = 1’

ground floor

second floor

third floor

fourth floor

fifth floor

sixth floor

seventh floor

mezzanine

roof

SOUTH ELEVATION1 SCALE: 1”= 8’-0”

Contents













0’

18’

32’

46’

60’

74‘

88‘

102’

116’

2.5’

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A2

A2

A1

A1

25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’

SOUTH ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/8” = 1’

ground floor

second floor

third floor

fourth floor

fifth floor

sixth floor

seventh floor

mezzanine

roof

SOUTH ELEVATION1 SCALE: 1”= 8’-0”

B1

B1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

A2A1

25’ 25’ 25’25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’

25’

20’

20’

FOUNDATION PLAN1 SCALE: 1/16”=1’-0”

A2

A2

A1

A1

B1

UP

UP

B1

LOBBY 4300 SF

ENTRANCE

OFFICE 2500 SFOFFICE 4640 SF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

STORAGE 1125 SF

STORAGE 1125 SF

FREIGHT295 SF

MECH 400 SF

MECH 400 SF

25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’

25’

20’

20’

2.5’

2.5’

2.5’

1

GROUND FLOOR PLAN2 SCALE: 1/16”=1’-0”

B1

B1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

A2A1

25’ 25’ 25’25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’25

’20

’20

’


Contents













RECP.CORRIDOR2365 SF

DNUP

B1

B1

OFFICE2315 SF

OFFICE2515 SF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

DN

OFFICE2100 SF

OFFICE1100 SF

OFFICE1100 SF

OFFICE1650 SF

UPUP

UP

25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’

25’

20’

20’

RE

CP.

425

SF

CONFERENCEROOM615 SF




RECP.

RECP.300 SF

A2

A2

A1

A1

2.5’

2.5’

2.5’

MECH 400 SF

MECH 400 SF

2

FOURTH FLOOR PLAN3 SCALE: 1/16”=1’-0”

RECP.

RECP.

25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’

25’

20’

20’

2.5’

2.5’

2.5’

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

DNDN

DN

DN UP

UP

CONFERENCEROOMBELOW

CONFERENCEROOMBELOW

A2

A2

A1

A1



CORRIDOR2365 SF

OFFICE1450 SF

OFFICE1100 SF

RE

CP.

425

SF

OFFICE1650 SF

OFFICE2315 SF

OFFICE1485 SF

OFFICE2735 SF

RECP.300 SF

B1

B1

MECH 400 SF

MECH 400 SF

FIFTH FLOOR PLAN4 SCALE: 1/16”=1’-0”

B1

B1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

A2A1

25’ 25’ 25’25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’

25’

20’

20’


B1

B1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’

25’

20’

20’

A2

A2

A1

A1

2.5’

2.5’

2.5’

TYPICAL MECHANICAL PLAN - RADIANT FLOOR2SCALE: 1/16”= 1’-0”

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

THEATER3330 SF

GALLERY3875 SF

OPEN TO BELOW

CAFE3075 SF

PRV. DINING525 SF

DN

DN

DNDN UP

A2

A2

A1

A1

B1

B1

DN

B1

25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’

25’

20’

20’

MECH 400 SF

2.5’ 2.5’

2.5’

OPEN TO BELOW

MECH 400 SF

MEZZANINE PLAN6 SCALE: 1”= 8’-0”

Contents













B1

B1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’

25’

20’

20’

A2

A2

A1

A1

2.5’

2.5’

2.5’

TYPICAL MECHANICAL PLAN - LIGHTING/SPRINKLER3 SCALE: 1/16”= 1’-0”

B1

B1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’

25’

20’

20’

A2

A2

A1

A1

2.5’

2.5’

2.5’

REFLECTED CEILING PLAN - VENTILATION DUCTWORK1 SCALE: 1/16”= 1’-0”

COLLABORATIVE DESIGN HOUSEteam TASK - trent oatman allison conley ayaka hales sang wok lee karl bengzon

DESCRIPTION SHEET NO.COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY GSAPPARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGY VSPRING 2012

CRITICS - SANDRA McKEE + JASON STONE

DETAIL DRAWINGS

A4.02

DETAIL AT CHANNEL GLASS (PARAPET)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT CURTAIN WALL (PARAPET)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT DUCTILE PANEL (TYPICAL)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT DUCTILE PANELSCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

FOOTING AT CHANNEL GLASS (SILL)SCALE: 1”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT COR-TEN BOX (HEAD)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT CURTAIN WALL (MIDSPAN)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT COR-TEN BOX (SILL)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT CURTAIN WALL (SILL)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

1 4

7

8

9

2 5

3 6

Contents
















DETAIL DRAWINGS

A4.02

DETAIL AT CHANNEL GLASS (PARAPET)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT CURTAIN WALL (PARAPET)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT DUCTILE PANEL (TYPICAL)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT DUCTILE PANELSCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

FOOTING AT CHANNEL GLASS (SILL)SCALE: 1”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT COR-TEN BOX (HEAD)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT CURTAIN WALL (MIDSPAN)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT COR-TEN BOX (SILL)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

DETAIL AT CURTAIN WALL (SILL)SCALE: 1 1/2”=1’-0”

1 4

7

8

9

2 5

3 6




SCALE: 1”= 1’

SCALE: 1”= 1’ ?

Prefabricated Ductile Panel

Rigid Insulation

Vapor Barrier

Ceramic Enamel-On-Steel Whiteboard

Concrete Slab

Adjustable Gravity Load Anchor

Wind Load Anchor

Creatherm Insulation

Radiant Floor Piping

Insulated Glazing Unit

Thermally-Broken Aluminum Mullion

IN OUT

SCALE: 1”= 3”PREFABRICATED PANEL TYPESSCALE: 1/8” = 1’

30% 30% 35% 40% 45% 0% 25%25%GLAZED AREA:

10’ 5’

14’

PREFABRICATED PANEL ASSEMBLY4

FACADE DETAILS A4.01

TYPICAL FACADE ASSEMBLY, FLOORS 2-61 SCALE: 1”= 1’-0”

PREFABRICATED PANEL TYPES3 SCALE: 1/8”= 1’-0”

PREFABRICATED PANEL JOINT2 SCALE: 1”= 3”

Contents
















SCALE: 1”= 1’

SCALE: 1”= 1’ ?

Prefabricated Ductile Panel

Rigid Insulation

Vapor Barrier

Ceramic Enamel-On-Steel Whiteboard

Concrete Slab

Adjustable Gravity Load Anchor

Wind Load Anchor

Creatherm Insulation

Radiant Floor Piping

Insulated Glazing Unit

Thermally-Broken Aluminum Mullion

IN OUT

SCALE: 1”= 3”PREFABRICATED PANEL TYPESSCALE: 1/8” = 1’

30% 30% 35% 40% 45% 0% 25%25%GLAZED AREA:

10’ 5’

14’

PREFABRICATED PANEL ASSEMBLY4

FACADE DETAILS A4.01

TYPICAL FACADE ASSEMBLY, FLOORS 2-61 SCALE: 1”= 1’-0”

PREFABRICATED PANEL TYPES3 SCALE: 1/8”= 1’-0”

PREFABRICATED PANEL JOINT2 SCALE: 1”= 3”

other experience

Along with a small group of peers, I partici-pated in the construction of Wendy the 2012 Young Architects Program winner which spent 10 weeks in the courtyard of MoMA PS1. The blue fabric that is the skin of Wen-dy was treated with a revolutionary nanofilm to reduce pollutants in the air. Along with this the instillation incorporates a water cannon and fans with misters attacted to provide shade and cooling to the visitors below.

HWKN Wendy:

Wendy reiterates the importance of brand-ing in architecture by giving personality and character to an otherwise static object.

Contents













Above:Site photos during the construction of Wendy at MoMA PS1.

I spent the summer of 2012 interning at a residential frim in Manhattan. Along with apartment renovations the frim was in the process of building its first house from the ground up. My involvement with the house began by designing the foyer staircase which incorporates a bench and a credenza and continued by devising schemes for the split level patio in the backyard.

Salles Schaffer Architecture:

Other office involvement included ordering construction materials and detailing construc-tion documents.

Above: Ground floor plan.1 - Foyer2 - Den3 - Living Room4 - Kitchen5 - Powder Room6 - Guest Room7 - Guest Bath8 - Laundry Room9 - Pool

Contents













Contents













Above:Construction documents and photographs of entry stair and skylight scrim.

In the second summer I spent at Eisenman Architects I worked to produce plans, sec-tions, and working models of the Pinerba Condominium project located in Milan, Italy. More than computer knowledge what was gained in my time at Peter’s office was the ability to use my eye to find solutions to design issues; something that Peter stressed often.

Eisenman Architects:

Other projects worked on include a competi-tion entry for the National Museum of Italian Judaism in Ferarra, Italy, a university building in northern Spain and a proposal for an addi-tion to the Rutgers Athletic Center.


via pinturicchio

via

pao

lo d

iaco

no

via

olin

do

gue

rrin

i

via luigi vanviteli

via giuseppe balza

retti

via giuseppe balza

retti

via

giov

anni

pas

coli

via

plin

io

via

plin

io

via pinturicchio

via attilio deffenu

Above: Physical model and surrounding site. eRight: Rendered view of proposed condominium on top of existing building. Previous page: Site plan.

K

K

K

K

K

B1

B1

B1

B2

B2

B2

B2

B3 ST

L

L

L

L

L

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

Above: Plan of two units on the fifth floor.advantage of the views of the surrounding



the end...

trent oatman portfolio

Documents

new york

ny summer

usa studio

tx summer

belgium summer

peter eisenman summer

usa advanced studio

usaadvanced studio