tribal rights

2
A Critical Assessment of the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution The Fifth Schedule of the Constitution was enacted to ensure that tribal “people could develop according to the lines of their own genius.” Unlike the Sixth Schedule which provided for greater autonomy by creation of autonomous councils for distinct tribes to preserve their autonomy in relation to customs, social practices and governance, this model of autonomous district councils was not adopted in the Fifth Schedule areas because it was assumed that most of the tribal populations in these areas – which in administrative and sometimes academic parlance unproblematically subsumes a heterogeneous set of ethnic groups including those categorised under the umbrella term Adivasis – had a greater interaction with the general population and were relatively less isolated. The office of the Governor was to play the pivotal role in the Fifth Schedule areas. It was felt that giving the Governor special powers to make laws for the “peace and good government” of the scheduled areas and the power to modify the application of central laws and state laws that were in conflict with the tribal interest would be in the benefit of the tribals. While additional measures such as Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, have been enacted to promote and protect the interests and rights of tribes, there are existing ambiguities in implementing this Act in the Fifth Schedule areas where tribals continue to be marginalised and deprived and has not adequately translated into tribal empowerment as a whole. This paper attempts to broach the

Upload: basildarlongdiengdoh

Post on 16-Jan-2016

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tribal Rights

A Critical Assessment of the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution

The Fifth Schedule of the Constitution was enacted to ensure that tribal “people could de-

velop according to the lines of their own genius.” Unlike the Sixth Schedule which provided

for greater autonomy by creation of autonomous councils for distinct tribes to preserve their

autonomy in relation to customs, social practices and governance, this model of autonomous

district councils was not adopted in the Fifth Schedule areas because it was assumed that

most of the tribal populations in these areas – which in administrative and sometimes aca-

demic parlance unproblematically subsumes a heterogeneous set of ethnic groups including

those categorised under the umbrella term Adivasis – had a greater interaction with the gen-

eral population and were relatively less isolated. The office of the Governor was to play the

pivotal role in the Fifth Schedule areas. It was felt that giving the Governor special powers to

make laws for the “peace and good government” of the scheduled areas and the power to

modify the application of central laws and state laws that were in conflict with the tribal inter-

est would be in the benefit of the tribals. While additional measures such as Panchayat (Ex-

tension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, have been enacted to promote and protect the inter-

ests and rights of tribes, there are existing ambiguities in implementing this Act in the Fifth

Schedule areas where tribals continue to be marginalised and deprived and has not adequately

translated into tribal empowerment as a whole. This paper attempts to broach the lacunae in

these aspects, with particular emphasis on the Fifth Schedule.

Authors’ names:

H. Theresa Darlong. Jawaharlal Nehru University, New DelhiBasil N. Darlong Diengdoh. English and Foreign Languages University, HyderabadS. Elika Assumi. English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad

Address for correspondence:

101 Shabbir Residency, 12-12-165 SitaphalmandiRavindra Nagar, Secunderabad – 500 061Telangana

Email ID and contact:

[email protected] +91 – 87319 21733

[email protected] +91 – 99850 87930